Tubal metaplasia of the endometrium with cytologic atypia: analysis of p53, Ki-67, TERT, and long-term follow-up

Morphological and immunohistochemical evaluation in distinguishing post-radiotherapy serous-like endometrial change (PoRSEC) and serous endometrial intraepithelial carcinoma (SEIC)

Uteri from women undergoing chemoradiotherapy (CRT) may show reactive atypia which may mimic serous endometrial intraepithelial carcinoma (SEIC). We aimed to assess the prevalence and morphological/immunohistochemical features of post-radiotherapy serous-like endometrial changes (PoRSEC) in women undergone CRT for locally advanced cervical cancer, with a focus on the differential diagnosis with SEIC. Consecutive patients with locally advanced cervical cancer undergone CRT between 2011 and 2018 were reviewed. Endometrial histological specimens were assessed for the presence of PoRSEC. Twenty-two cases of SEIC were included for comparison. Immunohistochemistry for p53, p16, and Ki67 was performed. Out of 244 reviewed patients, 36 (14.7%) showed PoRSEC. The degree of nuclear atypia was similar between PoRSECs and SEIC. However, a papillary architecture with areas of confluent papillae was only observed in SEIC. SEIC cases showed a high mitotic activity as opposed to PoRSEC cases. The expression of p53 was aberrant in all SEICs but in none of the PoRSECs; however, 13/36 PoRSECs showed p53 positivity in most tumor cells, potentially mimicking a mutation pattern. A block-type p16 expression was observed in all SEICs and in 16/36 PoRSECs. Mean Ki67 expression was 26.9% in SEIC (range 5-70%) and 8.16% in PoRSEC (range 5-35%). While SEIC showed sharp morphological and immunohistochemical demarcation, PoRSEC were more heterogenous and merged imperceptibly with normal endometrium. In conclusion, PoRSEC may mimic SEIC both morphologically and immunohistochemically. However, a papillary architecture with cytological demarcation is typically observed in SEIC but not in PoRSEC.

Diagnostic Challenges during Inflammation and Cancer: Current Biomarkers and Future Perspectives in Navigating through the Minefield of Reactive versus Dysplastic and Cancerous Lesions in the Digestive System

In the setting of pronounced inflammation, changes in the epithelium may overlap with neoplasia, often rendering it impossible to establish a diagnosis with certainty in daily clinical practice. Here, we discuss the underlying molecular mechanisms driving tissue response during persistent inflammatory signaling along with the potential association with cancer in the gastrointestinal tract, pancreas, extrahepatic bile ducts, and liver. We highlight the histopathological challenges encountered in the diagnosis of chronic inflammation in routine practice and pinpoint tissue-based biomarkers that could complement morphology to differentiate reactive from dysplastic or cancerous lesions. We refer to the advantages and limitations of existing biomarkers employing immunohistochemistry and point to promising new markers, including the generation of novel antibodies targeting mutant proteins, miRNAs, and array assays. Advancements in experimental models, including mouse and 3D models, have improved our understanding of tissue response. The integration of digital pathology along with artificial intelligence may also complement routine visual inspections. Navigating through tissue responses in various chronic inflammatory contexts will help us develop novel and reliable biomarkers that will improve diagnostic decisions and ultimately patient treatment.

Endometrioid Squamous Proliferations of the Endometrium Express Alpha-Methylacyl-CoA Racemase (P504s)

Squamous morular metaplasia is closely associated with endometrioid proliferative lesions such as endometrial intraepithelial neoplasia, whereas endometrioid adenocarcinoma may also demonstrate squamous differentiation (morular or nonmorular). Alpha-methylacyl-CoA racemase (AMACR; P504s) is an immunohistochemistry marker expressed in many tumors, including prostate adenocarcinoma, renal cell carcinoma, and in a subset of gynecologic carcinomas, predominantly of clear cell histology. In small biopsy samples, the distinction between cervical high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions (HSILs) involving endocervical glands from endometrioid squamous proliferations can be challenging, given their anatomic vicinity and some degree of morphologic overlap. Following the observation of AMACR positivity by immunohistochemistry within squamous morules in an index case, 35 endometrial samples containing squamous morular metaplasia (25) and nonmorular squamous metaplasia (10), and 32 cases of cervical HSIL involving endocervical glands were stained with AMACR. The endometrial cohort consisted of 2 benign anovulatory endometrium, 7 endometrial polyps, 7 endometrial intraepithelial neoplasia, 4 atypical polypoid adenomyomas, and 15 endometrioid adenocarcinomas. Positive cases were scored as diffuse (≥50%) or focal (<50%). AMACR staining was present in 96.7% of endometrial squamous lesions, including 14 (93.3%) of endometrioid carcinomas, and in all cases of endometrial intraepithelial neoplasia, endometrial polyps, atypical polypoid adenomyomas, and anovulatory endometrium with squamous morular metaplasia or nonmorular squamous metaplasia. In comparison, only 2 cases (5.8%) of cervical HSIL demonstrated positivity for AMACR. In conclusion, AMACR can reliably differentiate the cervical versus endometrial origin of squamous lesions in small biopsy specimens.

Endometrial Metaplastic/Reactive Changes Coexistent with Endometrial Hyperplasia and Carcinoma: A Morphological and Immunohistochemical Study

The aim of this study was to assess the relationship between endometrial metaplastic/reactive changes (EMRCs) and endometrial neoplastic lesions. Twenty cases of “simple” (without architecture complexity) EMRCs coexistent with endometrial malignant/premalignant lesions, twenty cases of neoplasia-unassociated EMRCs, and eight cases of complex metaplastic lesions were assessed by immunohistochemistry. EMRCs coexisted with endometrioid carcinoma (n = 12), atypical endometrial hyperplasia (n = 3), serous carcinoma (n = 2), and clear cell carcinoma (n = 3). Neoplasia-associated EMRCs showed a mean Ki67 labeling index of 12.6% (range 0–30%); with nuclear atypia in 16/20 (80%) cases; diffuse p16 expression in 15/20 (75%) cases; and heterogeneous ER, PR, and vimentin expression. Compared to the associated neoplasia, EMRCs showed a lower Ki67 expression (p < 0.001) and higher p16 expression (p < 0.001). No EMRC case showed mitotic activity, PTEN loss, MMR deficiency, nuclear β-catenin, p53-mutant pattern, Napsin A, or AMACR expression. No significant differences were found between neoplasia-associated and neoplasia-unassociated EMRCs. Complex metaplastic lesions showed a lower Ki67 expression than EMRCs (p = 0.044) and PTEN loss in 5/8 cases, even in the absence of nuclear atypia. In conclusion, neoplasia-associated simple EMRCs may show evident atypia and a worrisome immunophenotype, but no data support their involvement in endometrial carcinogenesis. Architectural complexity appears as a crucial factor to identify precancerous lesions.

Clear cell endometrial carcinoma precursors: presentation of two cases and diagnostic issues

BACKGROUND

The precursors of clear cell endometrial carcinoma (CC-EC) are still undefined. Here, we deal with the diagnostic issues related to CC-EC precursors by presenting a morphological, immunophenotypical and molecular study of two representative cases and discussing the relevant literature.

CASE PRESENTATION

Our and previous cases suggest that clear cell endometrial intraepithelial carcinoma (CC-EIC) is a real entity, which may be distinguished from metaplastic/reactive changes and from its serous counterpart. CC-EIC appears associated with atrophic polyps and may be diagnosed based on morphological and immunophenotypical features of CC-EC in the absence of invasive disease. We described a p53-mutant putative precursor characterized by high-grade nuclei in the absence of other distinctive features. Two putative low-grade precursors resembled atypical tubal metaplasia and endometrial intraepithelial neoplasia, although immunohistochemistry could not support their relationship with CC-EC.

CONCLUSIONS

In conclusion, pathologists should be aware of the existence of CC-EIC, since its correct diagnosis may be crucial for a correct patient management. Although several putative earlier precursors have been described, they does not show univocal features that allow their recognition in the common practice. Further studies are necessary in this field.

Rectal endometriosis mimicking primary rectal adenocarcinoma

Endometriosis is a benign entity defined as the presence of endometrium tissue outside of uterine cavity. It is a common disease involving peritoneum, pelvic organs, gastrointestinal tract, and so on. Diagnosis based on cytology specimen can be challenge when we encounter increased cytological atypia in the glandular epithelium, with abundant inflammatory cells and debris in the background. We presented a case of deep rectal endometriosis mimicking rectal adenocarcinoma on cytology specimen and on MRI imaging studies. The combination of endometrial glands, cellular Mullerian stroma, hemorrhage, and hemosiderin-laden macrophages are the characteristic features on cytologic specimens.

Ciliated Carcinoma of the Endometrium

We report a case of ciliated carcinoma of the endometrium in a 55-yr-old woman with stromal hyperthecosis of the ovaries. The patient presented with postmenopausal uterine bleeding and an endometrial curetting revealed an atypical epithelial proliferation that met the criteria for endometrioid adenocarcinoma notwithstanding an abundance of ciliated cells. Cilia were present not only within typical endometrioid glands but also within microacini of quasi-solid areas as well as inside intracytoplasmic vacuoles. The subsequent hysterectomy specimen demonstrated a well-differentiated adenocarcinoma of the endometrium with a predominance of neoplastic glands lined by ciliated epithelial cells, thus confirming the initial suspicion for ciliated carcinoma. Since the first description of ciliated adenocarcinoma of the endometrium in 1983, only a handful of additional cases have been reported in the literature. We review the spectrum of histologic presentations of this endometrial neoplasm and elaborate on its distinction from cilia-bearing mimickers and its histogenesis.

Could Obesity be a Triggering Factor for Endometrial Tubal Metaplasia to be a Precancerous Lesion?

BACKGROUND & AIMS

Endometrial tubal metaplasia (ETM) is mostly described in conjunction with unopposed estrogen levels, and its association with endometrial hyperplasia and endometrial carcinoma (EC) is striking. Obesity is a risk factor for endometrial hyperplasia and EC development. The aim of this study is to investigate the impact of BMI and serum estradiol level on expression of PAX-2, H-TERT, P16, Ki-67, and P53 in studied ETM in reference to benign endometrium and EC.

METHODS

The study was conducted on the following groups: group (1) consists of 57 cases that had endometrial biopsies with histologically demonstrable ETM (typical or atypical) and all were subjected to serum estradiol levelling and body mass index (BMI) evaluation; group (2) had adjacent benign endometrial tissue as control; group (3) consists of 52 cases of conventional endometrial carcinoma and 16 serous carcinoma paraffin blocks which were collected and reevaluated. All included groups were immunostained for PAX-2, H-TERT, p16, ki67, and p53.

RESULTS

The relation between BMI and serum estradiol level in group 1 and PAX-2, H-TERT, P16, and p53 was statistically significant, while their relation with atypia and ki67 expression was insignificant. Twenty-three ETM cases (40.4%) out of group 1 were all (100%) obese, 87% had high serum estradiol level, and 73.9% were postmenopausal and had a similar immunohistochemical profile as EC cases (group 3).

CONCLUSIONS

The presence of ETM regardless of the histologic atypia in obese postmenopausal patients with high serum estradiol level is an alarming sign. This implies that ETM might not be as benign as generally accepted, as under certain clinical conditions, it may turn into a potential premalignant lesion.

[Precursor lesions of endometrial carcinoma]

The 2014 WHO classification distinguishes between endometrial hyperplasia without atypia (EH) and atypical endometrial hyperplasia/endometrioid intraepithelial neoplasia (AEH/EIN). AEH/EIN is characterized by crowded glands with cytologically atypical epithelium separated by little intervening stroma. Cellular atypia is characterized by nuclear enlargement and rounding, pleomorphism, loss of polarity, and presence of nucleoli. The diagnosis of atypia is facilitated by comparison with areas of adjacent normal and non-atypical glands, respectively. AEH/EIN is often associated with squamous but also secretory and mucinous metaplasia. Loss of PTEN and/or PAX2 immunoreactivity occurs in up to two thirds of AEH/EIN. In contrast, invasive low-grade endometrioid carcinoma shows confluent growth with loss of stroma and formation of labyrinth-like or cribriform structures. Differential diagnosis includes different forms of metaplasias, papillary proliferations, and hyperplastic polyps. Epithelial metaplasia may be present in various benign endometrial lesions as well as in endometrioid adenocarcinoma. AEH/EIN may also occur in endometrial polyps. Progestin therapy of AEH/EIN has low level of evidence but frequently leads to complete regression. Serous intraepithelial carcinoma (SEIC) is characterized by high-grade cellular atypia and polymorphism, detachment of cells, a mutant immunoreactive pattern for the P53 and an increased Ki67 labeling index. Although designated as precursor of serous carcinoma of the endometrium, biologically it is considered a non-invasive serous carcinoma since it may already be associated with massive extrauterine spread.

Benign and Premalignant Lesions of the Endometrium

In this review, we highlight the benign and premalignant lesions of the endometrium that the pathologist may encounter in daily practice. We begin by detailing our current understanding of excess estrogen in the progression of endometrial neoplasia. We outline the currently accepted terminology to be used when evaluating proliferative endometrial lesions, while highlighting their key features. Attention is then turned to the molecular underpinnings of neoplastic progression and how this can be exploited with immunohistochemical stains when appropriate. Finally, we discuss types of metaplasia and their associations, including so-called papillary proliferations of the endometrium.