Novel uses of immunohistochemistry in the diagnosis and classification of soft tissue tumors

Update on immunohistochemistry in bone and soft tissue tumors: Cost-effectively replacing molecular testing with immunohistochemistry

Soft tissue tumors form part of a challenging domain in diagnostic pathology owing to their comparative rarity, astonishing histologic diversity, and overlap between entities. Many of these tumors are now known to be defined by highly recurrent, or, in some instances, unique molecular alterations. Insights from gene profiling continue to elucidate the wider molecular landscape of soft tissue tumors; many of these advances have been co-opted by immunohistochemistry (IHC) for diagnostic applications. There now exists a multitude of antibodies serving as surrogate markers of recurrent gene fusions, amplifications, and point mutations, which, in certain settings, can replace the need for more resource and time-intensive cytogenetic and molecular genetic analyses. IHC presents many advantages including rapid turnaround time, cost-effectiveness, and interpretative reproducibility. A sensible application of these immunohistochemical markers complemented by a working knowledge of the molecular pathogenesis of bone and soft tissue tumors permits accurate diagnosis in the majority of cases. In this review, we will outline some of these biomarkers while emphasizing molecular correlates and highlighting interpretative challenges and pitfalls.

A multicentric case study of fibroblastic and myofibroblastic oral spindle cell lesions

Context

Spindle cell lesions comprise a vast plethora of benign and malignant lesions with similar clinical and radiographic features. Their overlapping histopathologic features ensure a diagnostic dilemma.

Aim

The current multicentric study aims to delineate fibroblastic and myofibroblastic oral spindle cell lesions based on cytomorphology and comprehensive immunohistochemical analysis.

Settings and Design

The experimental study was conducted at MS Ramaiah University of Applied Sciences, Bangalore, and All India Institute of Applied Sciences, Delhi.

Methods and Material

A comprehensive histological scoring criteria and panel of immunohistochemical makers (STAT6, CD31, CD34, S100, SMA, vimentin, pan-CK, HHF-35, Ki67, ALK, desmin, HMB-45, SATB2, ERG, EMA and CD99) were employed concurrently for the first time for fibroblastic and myofibroblastic oral spindle cell lesions. The data obtained was tabulated and studied.

Statistical Analysis Used

NA. Results: Using cytological scoring criteria and panel of immunohistochemical makers, the cases analysed and characterized were desmoplastic fibroma, fibrosarcoma, leiomyosarcoma, nodular fasciitis, neurofibroma and epithelioid inflammatory myofibroblastic sarcoma (EIMS).

Conclusions

The diagnostic strategies need to be upgraded for the diagnosis of spindle cell lesions. Emphasis must be placed on cytomorphology, an immunohistochemistry (IHC) panel of markers is imperative for the accurate diagnosis of fibroblastic and myofibroblastic oral spindle cell lesions.

Extraskeletal Ewing sarcoma presenting as an axillary mass with pulmonary metastases

Extraskeletal Ewing sarcoma (EES) is a tumour of rare variant of the Ewing sarcoma family of tumours. This family of tumours can have different features; however, these tumours are categorised on the basis of genetic translocation, specific molecular and immunohistochemical features. EES is seen commonly affecting young adults with poor prognosis and high mortality rates. It can be detected in various locations making its diagnosis more difficult. It can present with varied imaging features, often non-specific. However, imaging plays a vital role in the primary tumour assessment, local staging, preoperative management and surveillance. Management involves surgery with chemotherapy. Long-term prognosis in cases of metastatic disease is very poor. In literature, only three cases of axillary EES have been reported so far. Here, we report the fourth case of large EES originating in the left axillary region in a woman in her 20s. The patient was given neoadjuvant chemotherapy; however, the size of the tumour increased, which was later surgically treated with complete excision of the tumour. Unfortunately, the tumour metastasised to the lung for which the patient was irradiated. Afterwards, the patient presented to the emergency room with respiratory distress for which she was on ventilator support; sadly, the patient died after 1 week.

The Recent Advances in Molecular Diagnosis of Soft Tissue Tumors

Soft tissue tumors are rare mesenchymal tumors with divergent differentiation. The diagnosis of soft tissue tumors is challenging for pathologists owing to the diversity of tumor types and histological overlap among the tumor entities. Present-day understanding of the molecular pathogenesis of soft tissue tumors has rapidly increased with the development of molecular genetic techniques (e.g., next-generation sequencing). Additionally, immunohistochemical markers that serve as surrogate markers for recurrent translocations in soft tissue tumors have been developed. This review aims to provide an update on recently described molecular findings and relevant novel immunohistochemical markers in selected soft tissue tumors.

Immunohistochemical Expression of p16 and CDK4 in Soft Tissue Tumors

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

 The aim of this study was to determine the immunohistochemical expression of p16 (p16^INK4a) and cyclin-dependent kinase 4 (CDK4) and CDK4 markers in various lineages of soft tissue tumors and to evaluate their role in differentiating atypical lipomatous tumors/well-differentiated liposarcomas from benign lipomas.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

A total of 70 cases of both excisional and incisional biopsies of soft tissue tumors were included in this study. Histopathological examination was done by using formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded tissue samples. After that, we performed IHC expressions of p16 and CDK4 markers on the unstained slides of these soft tissue tumors.  Results: Immunohistochemical study showed that positive expressions of p16, CDK4, and combined (p16+CDK4) markers were 51.4%, 10.0%, and 12.9%, respectively in soft tissue tumors. Positive p16 expression was observed among a higher proportion of malignant cases (66.7%) as compared to benign (20.0%) and intermediate (50.0%) cases. This difference was found to be statistically significant (p=0.009). Negative expression of only CDK4 and combined (p16 and CDK4) were observed among a higher proportion of benign as compared to malignant and intermediate cases (90.0% vs. 78.6% & 75.0%, p=0.393 and 65.0% vs. 26.2% & 37.5%, p=0.028, respectively). This difference was not found to be statistically significant. For adipocytic tumors, the majority of malignant and intermediate tumors had positive p16 (7/7; 100%) and CDK4 (6/7; 85.7%) immunohistochemical expression. These differences were found to be statistically significant.

CONCLUSION

Immunohistochemical marker p16 can be used to differentiate between malignant and benign soft tissue tumors. Amongst adipocytic tumors, combination of p16 and CDK4 immunohistochemical expression can be used to differentiate liposarcomas from benign ones.

Primary Dedifferentiated Liposarcoma of the Posterior Mediastinum With a Positive Surgical Margin

Liposarcoma often occurs in the extremities and retroperitoneum. Primary mediastinal liposarcoma is uncommon, and there is no settled opinion regarding adjuvant therapy after surgery. We have recently experienced a relatively rare case of primary dedifferentiated liposarcoma of the posterior mediastinum. The patient was a 76-year-old woman. An abnormal shadow was noted in the posterior mediastinum. Esophageal submucosal tumor and gastrointestinal stromal tumor were suspected; endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration was performed, but a definitive diagnosis could not be obtained. As the tumor tended to slowly grow, surgical resection was performed. Based on histopathological findings, the patient was diagnosed with primary dedifferentiated liposarcoma of the posterior mediastinum. Owing to the presence of a positive surgical margin, postoperative radiotherapy (60 Gy/24 fr/6 w) was administered. No recurrence was observed after three and a half years of follow-up. The prognosis of primary dedifferentiated liposarcoma of the posterior mediastinum with a positive surgical margin is poor, but postoperative radiotherapy may be useful.

The Small Round Cell Sarcomas Complexities and Desmoplastic Presentation

Background

Small round cell sarcomas (SRCSs) account for most solid malignancies in the pediatric age group and are a part of group of malignant tumors characterized by heterogenous clinical presentation and overlapping microscopic features of small, round, primitive cells. In addition to the recently established certain genetically defined subset of undifferentiated round cell sarcomas of soft tissue and bone, this group of sarcomas include desmoplastic small round cell tumor, poorly differentiated synovial sarcoma, alveolar rhabdomyosarcoma, mesenchymal chondrosarcoma, and small cell osteosarcoma. Although, those entities share clinical and cytomorphologic features and cannot be unequivocally classified based on clinical presentation and morphology alone. Most of SRCSs characterizes of particular patterns of protein expression or genetic changes and ancillary tests remain necessary to confirm or rule out a specific diagnosis. Subtle but occasionally distinctive cytologic features narrows the number of differential diagnoses and helps to select appropriate ancillary tests necessary for the final diagnosis. Thus, when adequate fine needle aspiration (FNA) biopsy specimen is combined with ancillary tests, a specific histologic diagnosis can be made in almost all cases. However, due to complex cytologic features of SRCS as well as various quality and diversity of FNA smears, there are cases in that cytologic features which do not entirely match the known diagnostic criteria.

Summary

The aim of this review was to summarize cytomorphologic criteria and to present rare and divergent cytological features of SRCSs. Careful assessment of clinical presentation, cytological features, immunohistochemical patterns, and molecular alternations is necessary for an accurate diagnosis. Knowing of rare and divergent microscopic findings that does not fit with the known cytological criteria will help to avoid misdiagnosis.

Key Messages

The role of FNA biopsies diagnosing soft tissue and bone tumors has been increasing because of the ability of ancillary tests to assist in the diagnosis of specific tumors. SRCSs may be diagnosed accurately in cytology specimens. Access to clinical and radiographic presentation, utility of ancillary tests, understanding complexity of cytological features, and awareness of the rare cytologic findings that differ from that of the established diagnostic criteria are essential to make correct diagnosis.

Retrospective analysis of primary intraosseous malignancies in mandible and maxilla in a population of Taiwanese patients

BACKGROUND/PURPOSE

Due to the rarity and diversity of primary intraosseous malignancies in jawbones, we aimed to evaluate the clinicopathological features and discuss the findings of our collected cases with the literatures.

METHODS

Twenty-nine patients (2000-2020) diagnosed with primary central malignancies of jawbones were selected from the database of Oral Pathology Department in our institution. Clinical features, radiographic appearance, and histopathological diagnosis of the 29 cases were analyzed.

RESULTS

Twenty-nine patients aged between 19 and 84 years (average, 57.4 years) with a male to female ratio of 1.2:1 were included. The most frequent site was the mandibular body and ramus, followed by the posterior maxilla and mandibular symphysis. The most common diagnosis was osteogenic sarcoma (n = 13), followed by odontogenic carcinoma (n = 7), hematologic malignancies (n = 5), salivary gland malignancies (n = 2), and neurogenic sarcomas (n = 2). The most frequent symptoms were swelling, pain, paresthesia of lower lip, and mobile tooth. Radiographically, they usually presented as ill-defined osteolytic to osteoblastic lesions depending on the amount of ossification. Wide excision comprising partial maxillectomy and segmental mandibulectomy were the most common therapeutic methods.

CONCLUSION

Despite the rarity of primary central malignancies in jawbones, the clinical features may mimic infectious process or benign lesions. Detailed history-taking, clinical and imaging examination and awareness of the patient's signs and symptoms combining with the histopathological inspection are important for early diagnosis and improved prognosis. The current data contributes a useful basis for clinical investigation regarding intraosseous malignancies occurring in the jawbones.

Mesenchymal Tumors of the Mediastinum: An Update on Diagnostic Approach

Mesenchymal tumors of the mediastinum are a heterogenous group of rare tumors with divergent lineages. Mediastinal mesenchymal tumors are diagnostically challenging due to their diversity and morphologic overlap with nonmesenchymal lesions arising in the mediastinum. Accurate histologic diagnosis is critical for appropriate patient management and prognostication. Many mediastinal mesenchymal tumors affect distinct age groups or occur at specific mediastinal compartments. Neurogenic tumors, liposarcoma, solitary fibrous tumor, and synovial sarcoma are common mesenchymal tumors in the mediastinum. Herein, we provide an update on the diagnostic approach to mediastinal mesenchymal tumors and a review of the histologic features and differential diagnosis of common benign and malignant mesenchymal tumors of the mediastinum.

Cytology of Undifferentiated Round-Cell Sarcomas of Bone and Soft Tissue: Ewing Sarcoma or Not Ewing Sarcoma , That Is the Question

BACKGROUND

Undifferentiated round-cell sarcomas (URCSs) of soft tissue and bone are a group of clinically heterogeneous tumors. Diagnosis of these malignancies is based mainly on recurrent genetic alterations. The most common and the best known representative of this group is Ewing sarcoma (ES) which is characterized by gene fusions including EWSR1 or FUS and ETS transcription factors family. Other newly described entities are CIC-rearranged sarcoma, sarcoma with BCOR genetic alterations, and round-cell sarcoma with EWSR1-non-ETS fusions. All these novel tumors are known as Ewing-like sarcomas.

SUMMARY

It is believed that morphologic features of ES and Ewing-like sarcomas vary only slightly or even that cytomorphology is not relevant. But differences are usually obvious, and some cytologic findings, such as spindle cells, connective tissue fragments, or myxoid stroma, are typical for Ewing-like sarcomas but not for ES. Each of these entities is also characterized by different immunoprofiles. The aim of this review was to summarize cytomorphologic and immunohistochemical features of URCS and compare them with other small round-cell tumors. Key Messages: Cytology can be successfully used in URCS diagnosis as a complementary tool for core-needle biopsy or even alone in selected cases, especially in recurrent and metastatic tumors. Knowing the morphologic and immunohistochemical differences between URCS is essential to provide appropriate ancillary studies and make a definitive diagnosis.

Mediastinal neuroblastoma, ganglioneuroblastoma, and ganglioneuroma: Pathology review and diagnostic approach

Neuroblastic tumors are a group of tumors of the sympathetic ganglia and adrenal medulla that derive from primordial neural crest cells. These tumors include neuroblastoma, intermixed ganglioneuroblastoma, nodular ganglioneuroblastoma, and ganglioneuroma. Neuroblastomas are the most common extracranial solid tumor arising in childhood and may occur in different anatomic sites. Neuroblastic tumors are common mesenchymal tumors of the mediastinum. Herein, we describe advances in our understanding of neuroblastic tumor biology. Pathologists should be aware of diagnostic challenges associated with these tumors to ensure correct histologic diagnosis and appropriate clinical management. We describe updated mediastinal neuroblastic tumor pathology, focusing on morphological, immunohistochemical, and molecular features and differential diagnoses.

Ewing Sarcoma-Diagnosis, Treatment, Clinical Challenges and Future Perspectives

Ewing sarcoma, a highly aggressive bone and soft-tissue cancer, is considered a prime example of the paradigms of a translocation-positive sarcoma: a genetically rather simple disease with a specific and neomorphic-potential therapeutic target, whose oncogenic role was irrefutably defined decades ago. This is a disease that by definition has micrometastatic disease at diagnosis and a dismal prognosis for patients with macrometastatic or recurrent disease. International collaborations have defined the current standard of care in prospective studies, delivering multiple cycles of systemic therapy combined with local treatment; both are associated with significant morbidity that may result in strong psychological and physical burden for survivors. Nevertheless, the combination of non-directed chemotherapeutics and ever-evolving local modalities nowadays achieve a realistic chance of cure for the majority of patients with Ewing sarcoma. In this review, we focus on the current standard of diagnosis and treatment while attempting to answer some of the most pressing questions in clinical practice. In addition, this review provides scientific answers to clinical phenomena and occasionally defines the resulting translational studies needed to overcome the hurdle of treatment-associated morbidities and, most importantly, non-survival.

Molecular Approaches to Diagnosis in Ewing Sarcoma: Fluorescence In Situ Hybridization (FISH)

The differential diagnosis of small round cell tumors (SRCT) crucially relies on the synoptic evaluation of morphology, immunohistochemical patterns, and molecular features. Though the implementation of broad RNA sequencing in diagnostic molecular pathology routines has substantially changed the standards of molecular affirmation of diagnoses, fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) on formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded (FFPE) tissue sections is still an elementary tool to provide a rapid molecular corroboration of diagnoses, essentially required for therapeutic decisions. We discuss here the major FISH approaches currently employed in diagnostic molecular pathology, addressing classic Ewing sarcoma and differential diagnoses among SRCT which cannot sufficiently be ruled out by immunohistochemistry. This chapter will approach technical issues but particularly strategies and pitfalls in the interpretation of FISH patterns.

SATB2 is not a reliable diagnostic marker for distinguishing between oral osteosarcoma and fibro-osseous lesions of the jaws

OBJECTIVE

Special AT-rich binding protein 2 (SATB2) is an immunohistochemical marker for osteoblast differentiation. Our aim was to investigate SATB2 expression in oral osteosarcoma and other bone-producing oral tumors/reactive lesions to evaluate its usefulness as a diagnostic marker.

STUDY DESIGN

A total of 74 intraosseous and soft tissue bone-producing surgical samples and 10 samples of reactive bone tissue were stained with SATB2, including osteosarcoma/chondrosarcoma (n = 16), fibro-osseous lesions (n = 42), central giant cell granuloma (n = 6), osteoblastoma (n = 1), and gingival lesions (n = 9). Nuclear labeling of the stromal spindle cells and intensity of staining was scored and analyzed.

RESULTS

The intraosseous (n = 65/65) and soft tissue samples (n = 9/9) diffusely expressed SATB2. The strongest expression was observed in juvenile aggressive ossifying fibroma (n = 2/2). Weak SATB2 expression was observed in the stromal spindle cells adjacent to reactive bone tissue (periosteal bone reaction).

CONCLUSIONS

Our results indicate that SATB2 is not a reliable diagnostic marker for oral osteosarcoma but has practical use in detecting cells with osteoblast differentiation in histologic samples with scant bone production or in differentiating between a periosteal bone reaction and neoplastic bone induced by the tumor mesenchymal cells. Targeting SATB2 as an alternative therapy in oral osteosarcoma, fibro-osseous lesions, and central giant cell granuloma should be further investigated.

Diagnostic Differences in Expert Second-Opinion Consultation Cases at a Tertiary Sarcoma Center

Soft tissue tumors are diagnostically challenging, and it is recommended that these are reported or reviewed by specialist soft tissue pathologists. We present our experience with second-opinion (consultation) cases in a specialist tertiary sarcoma center. The aim of this study was to determine areas of diagnostic difficulty in soft tissue pathology. We assessed 581 second-opinion cases which were reviewed by two experienced pathologists in a period of one year. There was 62% concordance between the original and the second-opinion diagnosis, with diagnostic discrepancy in 38%. The largest group of soft tissue neoplasms received for second opinion was fibroblastic/myofibroblastic tumors, and most major diagnostic problems were encountered in adipocytic and so-called “fibrohistiocytic” tumors. Major diagnostic errors impacting management were found in 148 cases (25%). Morphologic assessment of tumors, judicious use of molecular techniques, newer immunostains and their interpretation, along with importance of knowledge of rarer entities were found to be most useful in avoiding errors.

Retroperitoneal Sarcomas: An Update on the Diagnostic Pathology Approach

Retroperitoneal sarcomas are a heterogenous group of rare tumors arising in the retroperitoneum. Retroperitoneal sarcomas comprise approximately 10% of all soft tissue sarcomas. Though any soft tissue sarcoma histologic types may arise in the retroperitoneal space, liposarcoma (especially well-differentiated and dedifferentiated types) and leiomyosarcoma do so most commonly. Retroperitoneal sarcomas are diagnostically challenging, owing to their diversity and morphological overlap with other tumors arising in the retroperitoneum. An accurate diagnosis is necessary for correct management and prognostication. Herein, we provide an update on the diagnostic approach to retroperitoneal sarcomas and review their key histologic findings and differential diagnoses.

NAP1L1: A Novel Human Colorectal Cancer Biomarker Derived From Animal Models of Apc Inactivation

Introduction

Colorectal cancer (CRC) is the second leading cause of cancer death worldwide and most deaths result from metastases. We have analyzed animal models in which Apc, a gene that is frequently mutated during the early stages of colorectal carcinogenesis, was inactivated and human samples to try to identify novel potential biomarkers for CRC.

Materials and Methods

We initially compared the proteomic and transcriptomic profiles of the small intestinal epithelium of transgenic mice in which Apc and/or Myc had been inactivated. We then studied the mRNA and immunohistochemical expression of one protein that we identified to show altered expression following Apc inactivation, nucleosome assembly protein 1–like 1 (NAP1L1) in human CRC samples and performed a prognostic correlation between biomarker expression and survival in CRC patients.

Results

Nap1l1 mRNA expression was increased in mouse small intestine following Apc deletion in a Myc dependant manner and was also increased in human CRC samples. Immunohistochemical NAP1L1 expression was decreased in human CRC samples relative to matched adjacent normal colonic tissue. In a separate cohort of 75 CRC patients, we found a strong correlation between NAP1L1 nuclear expression and overall survival in those patients who had stage III and IV cancers.

Conclusion

NAP1L1 expression is increased in the mouse small intestine following Apc inactivation and its expression is also altered in human CRC. Immunohistochemical NAP1L1 nuclear expression correlated with overall survival in a cohort of CRC patients. Further studies are now required to clarify the role of this protein in CRC.

FET(EWSR1)-TFCP2 Rhabdomyosarcoma: An Additional Example of this Aggressive Variant with Predilection for the Gnathic Bones

An example of a mandibular rhabdomyosarcoma in a 15-year-old male is described featuring EWSR1-TFCP2 fusion with homolateral lymph node metastasis and apparent metastasis to the thoracic vertebra T7. This type of rhabdomyosarcoma has preference for the craniofacial skeleton. Histologically, the tumor was composed of spindle and epithelioid cells characterized by nuclear pleomorphism, cytologic atypia and brisk mitotic activity. Immunohistochemically, it featured diffuse positive nuclear staining MYOD1, only focal staining for myogenin and patchy cytoplasmic staining for desmin. Tumor cells were positive for keratins and nuclear staining for SATB2 was also observed. Interestingly, tumor cells were diffusely positive for calponin. Currently, the patient is under chemotherapy treatment.

Aggressive Intraosseous Myofibroma of the Maxilla: Report of a Rare Case and Literature Review

Myofibroma (MF) is a benign mesenchymal myofibroblast-derived tumor, which occurs most frequently in children, and rarely affects the maxilla. We reported a case of an aggressive intraosseous lesion found in the maxilla of a 9-year-old female child. Intraorally, the swelling extended from tooth 12 to 16, causing displacement of teeth 13, 14, and 15. Computed tomography revealed a large osteolytic lesion causing thinning and cortical erosion. Microscopically, the lesion showed a proliferation of spindle-shaped cells, with elongated nuclei and eosinophilic cytoplasm, arranged in interlaced fascicles. The immunohistochemical analysis revealed cytoplasmic positivity for α-SMA and HHF-35, and negativity for desmin, laminin, S-100, β-catenin, and CD34. Ki-67 was positive in 8% of tumor cells. The diagnosis was MF. Herein, we describe an additional case of central MF arising in the maxilla, including clinical, imaging, microscopical, and immunohistochemical features, as well as a review of the literature.

Use of Fluorescence In Situ Hybridization (FISH) in Diagnosis and Tailored Therapies in Solid Tumors

Fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) is a standard technique used in routine diagnostics of genetic aberrations. Thanks to simple FISH procedure is possible to recognize tumor-specific abnormality. Its applications are limited to designed probe type. Gene rearrangements e.g., ALK, ROS1 reflecting numerous translocational partners, deletions of critical regions e.g., 1p and 19q, gene fusions e.g., COL1A1-PDGFB, genomic imbalances e.g., 6p, 6q, 11q and amplifications e.g., HER2 are targets in personalized oncology. Confirmation of genetic marker is frequently a direct indication to start specific, targeted treatment. In other cases, detected aberration helps pathologists to better distinguish soft tissue sarcomas, or to state a final diagnosis. Our main goal is to show that applying FISH to formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded tissue sample (FFPE) enables assessing genomic status in the population of cells deriving from a primary tumor or metastasis. Although many more sophisticated techniques are available, like Real-Time PCR or new generation sequencing, FISH remains a commonly used method in many genetic laboratories.

Case Report: Primary Ewing Sarcoma of the Penis With Multiple Metastases

Background: Ewing sarcoma is the second most common malignant bone tumor in children, but it rarely originates from extra-skeletal sites. The commonly involved sites of soft tissue include paravertebral spaces, lower extremities, the pelvis, head, and neck, while primary extra-skeletal Ewing sarcoma (EES) located in the genitals is extremely rare. Case Presentation: We report a young patient who presented to our hospital with a painful erection of the penis and limited motion of the left hip. Magnetic resonance imaging showed a hyperintense mass with invasion of adjacent tissue in the penis and a heterogeneously high signal lesion in the left proximal femur. ¹⁸F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron-emission tomography detected widespread metastatic lesions in the bilateral lung and multiple skeletons. An incisional biopsy of the penis was performed; the histopathological findings and EWS gene translocation identified by molecular analysis confirmed the diagnosis of Ewing sarcoma. Subsequently, the punch-biopsy specimen from the left femur showed undifferentiated small round cells, a finding consistent with the microscopic presence of Ewing sarcoma metastasis. However, after the first course of multiagent chemotherapy, the penile mass did not obtain stabilization but instead grew progressively with surface ulceration and multidrug resistant bacteria infection. Despite receiving antibiotics and maximal supportive therapy, the patient died from sepsis and lung metastasis complications in the intensive care unit 2 months later. Conclusion: This case indicates that although EES as a subtype of Ewing sarcoma is rare, it can occur virtually in any soft tissue site, even in the genitals. Therefore, clinicians need to distinguish this entity from other soft tissue sarcomas with rapid progression since early diagnosis and timely treatment of EES are pivotal for a favorable prognosis.

[2018 Consensus statement by the Spanish Society of Pathology and the Spanish Society of Medical Oncology on the diagnosis and treatment of cancer of unknown primary]

Cancer of unknown primary is defined as a heterogeneous group of tumours that present with metastasis, and in which attempts to identify the original site have failed. They differ from other primary tumours in their biological features and how they spread, which means they can be considered a separate entity. There are several hypotheses regarding their origin, but the most plausible explanation for their aggressiveness and chemoresistance seems to involve chromosomal instability. Depending on the type of study done, cancer of unknown primary can account for 2-9% of all cancer patients, mostly 60-75 years old. This article reviews the main clinical, pathological and molecular studies conducted to analyse and determine the origin of cancer of unknown primary. The main strategies for patient management and treatment, by both clinicians and pathologists, are also addressed.

Ewing sarcoma

Ewing sarcoma is the second most frequent bone tumour of childhood and adolescence that can also arise in soft tissue. Ewing sarcoma is a highly aggressive cancer, with a survival of 70-80% for patients with standard-risk and localized disease and ~30% for those with metastatic disease. Treatment comprises local surgery, radiotherapy and polychemotherapy, which are associated with acute and chronic adverse effects that may compromise quality of life in survivors. Histologically, Ewing sarcomas are composed of small round cells expressing high levels of CD99. Genetically, they are characterized by balanced chromosomal translocations in which a member of the FET gene family is fused with an ETS transcription factor, with the most common fusion being EWSR1-FLI1 (85% of cases). Ewing sarcoma breakpoint region 1 protein (EWSR1)-Friend leukaemia integration 1 transcription factor (FLI1) is a tumour-specific chimeric transcription factor (EWSR1-FLI1) with neomorphic effects that massively rewires the transcriptome. Additionally, EWSR1-FLI1 reprogrammes the epigenome by inducing de novo enhancers at GGAA microsatellites and by altering the state of gene regulatory elements, creating a unique epigenetic signature. Additional mutations at diagnosis are rare and mainly involve STAG2, TP53 and CDKN2A deletions. Emerging studies on the molecular mechanisms of Ewing sarcoma hold promise for improvements in early detection, disease monitoring, lower treatment-related toxicity, overall survival and quality of life.

The pathology of soft tissue sarcomas

Soft tissue sarcomas represent a heterogeneous group of rare malignancies exhibiting mesenchymal differentiation with an overall incidence of around 5/100,000/year. Rarity and morphologic heterogeneity significantly affect diagnostic accuracy; therefore, expertise can be achieved only through access to large number of cases. Soft tissue sarcomas are currently classified on the basis of the 2013 WHO classification of soft tissue tumors that integrate conventional morphology with immunohistochemistry and molecular genetics. The morphologic diagnosis of sarcoma relies on the evaluation as well as the integration of four main features: the shape of the neoplastic cells; the pattern of growth; the quality of the background; the architecture of the vascular network. Immunohistochemical characterization plays a key role in the diagnostic workup of soft tissue sarcomas. The majority of classic differentiation markers tend to show good sensitivity, however, associated with rather limited specificity, making interpretation in context with morphology mandatory. Molecular genetics is increasingly used for diagnostic purposes to distinguish specific subtypes of sarcomas, to support diagnosis in non-canonical clinical presentations and also to distinguish true sarcomas from benign mimickers. With many exceptions, histologic typing does not provide sufficient information for predicting the clinical course of the disease and, therefore, grading systems based on histological parameters were introduced to provide a more accurate estimation of the degree of malignancy of tumors. The three-tiered system devised by the French Federation of Cancer Centers Sarcoma Group (FNCLCC) systems is widely adopted; however, several limitations exist that have led to the development of prognostic nomograms that incorporate the specific histotype as one of the relevant parameters.

2018 consensus statement by the Spanish Society of Pathology and the Spanish Society of Medical Oncology on the diagnosis and treatment of cancer of unknown primary

Cancer of unknown primary (CUP) is defined as a heterogeneous group of tumours that present with metastasis, and in which attempts to identify the original site have failed. They differ from other primary tumours in their biological features and how they spread, which means that they can be considered a separate entity. There are several hypotheses regarding their origin, but the most plausible explanation for their aggressiveness and chemoresistance seems to involve chromosomal instability. Depending on the type of study done, CUP can account for 2–9% of all cancer patients, mostly 60–75 years old. This article reviews the main clinical, pathological, and molecular studies conducted to analyse and determine the origin of CUP. The main strategies for patient management and treatment, by both clinicians and pathologists, are also addressed.

Soft Tissue Tumor Immunohistochemistry Update: Illustrative Examples of Diagnostic Pearls to Avoid Pitfalls

CONTEXT

- Current 2013 World Health Organization classification of tumors of soft tissue arranges these tumors into 12 groups according to their histogenesis. Tumor behavior is classified as benign, intermediate (locally aggressive), intermediate (rarely metastasizing), and malignant. In our practice, a general approach to reaching a definitive diagnosis of soft tissue tumors is to first evaluate clinicoradiologic, histomorphologic, and cytomorphologic features of the tumor to generate some pertinent differential diagnoses. These include the potential line of histogenesis and whether the tumor is benign or malignant, and low or high grade. Although molecular/genetic testing is increasingly finding its applications in characterizing soft tissue tumors, currently immunohistochemistry still not only plays an indispensable role in defining tumor histogenesis, but also serves as a surrogate for underlining molecular/genetic alterations. Objective- To provide an overview focusing on the current concepts in the classification and diagnosis of soft tissue tumors, incorporating immunohistochemistry. This article uses examples to discuss how to use the traditional and new immunohistochemical markers for the diagnosis of soft tissue tumors. Practical diagnostic pearls, summary tables, and figures are used to show how to avoid diagnostic pitfalls.

DATA SOURCES

- Data were obtained from pertinent peer-reviewed English-language literature and the authors' first-hand experience as bone and soft tissue pathologists.

CONCLUSIONS

- -The ultimate goal for a pathologist is to render a specific diagnosis that provides diagnostic, prognostic, and therapeutic information to guide patient care. Immunohistochemistry is integral to the diagnosis and management of soft tissue tumors.

Ewing Sarcoma, an Update on Molecular Pathology with Therapeutic Implications

Ewing sarcoma is a developmental tumor characterized by balanced chromosomal translocations and formation of new fusion genes. Despite the large amount of knowledge regarding the molecular aspects obtained in the last few years, many questions still remain. This article focuses on research on the molecular pathology and possible developments in targeted therapies in this malignancy and discusses some related bottlenecks, as well as the possible role of pathologists, the availability of samples, the lack of appropriate animal models, and the resources needed to carry out preclinical and clinical research.

STAT6 Reliably Distinguishes Solitary Fibrous Tumors from Myofibromas

Solitary fibrous tumors (SFT) and myofibromas (MF) historically have belonged to the same morphologic spectrum and have been lumped together under the nonspecific umbrella term, "hemangiopericytoma" along with other pericytic/myoid tumors. While current evidence shows clear distinction between the two entities, they frequently remain in the same histopathologic differential diagnosis. This diagnostic dilemma especially is common for smaller incisional biopsies from the oral cavity. STAT6 immunohistochemistry (IHC) recently was established as a reliable method to detect solitary fibrous tumor; however, the literature is sparse regarding STAT6 reactivity in MFs. The authors report ten new cases of oral solitary fibrous tumor, discuss histopathologic similarities and differences between the two tumors, and list respective STAT6 IHC expressivity. After IRB approval, 10 cases diagnosed as SFT and 24 cases of MF were collected from the University of Florida Oral and Maxillofacial Pathology Biopsy Service between the years 1994 and 2016. The original hematoxylin and eosin slides and related IHC were reviewed. IHC with STAT6 antibody was performed on all 34 samples, and the findings were analyzed. All cases were from the oral cavity or perioral regions. 10/10 SFTs expressed STAT6 nuclear reactivity, while no cases of MF showed nuclear expression of STAT6. STAT6 is a dependable marker to differentiate SFTs from MFs.

The spectrum of EWSR1-rearranged neoplasms at a tertiary sarcoma centre; assessing 772 tumour specimens and the value of current ancillary molecular diagnostic modalities

Background:

EWSR1 rearrangements were first identified in Ewing sarcoma, but the spectrum of EWSR1-rearranged neoplasms now includes many soft tissue tumour subtypes including desmoplastic small round cell tumour (DSRCT), myxoid liposarcoma (MLPS), extraskeletal myxoid chondrosarcoma (EMC), angiomatoid fibrous histiocytoma (AFH), clear cell sarcoma (CCS) and myoepithelial neoplasms. We analysed the spectrum of EWSR1-rearranged soft tissue neoplasms at our tertiary sarcoma centre, by assessing ancillary molecular diagnostic modalities identifying EWSR1-rearranged tumours and reviewing the results in light of our current knowledge of these and other Ewing sarcoma-like neoplasms.

Methods:

We retrospectively analysed all specimens tested for EWSR1 rearrangements by fluorescence in situ hybridisation (FISH) and/or reverse transcription–PCR (RT–PCR) over a 7-year period.

Results:

There was a total of 772 specimens. FISH was performed more often than RT–PCR (n=753, 97.5% vs n=445, 57.6%). In total, 210 (27.9%) specimens were FISH-positive for EWSR1 rearrangement compared to 111 (14.4%) that showed EWSR1 fusion transcripts with RT–PCR. Failure rates for FISH and RT–PCR were 2.5% and 18.0%. Of 109 round cell tumours with pathology consistent with Ewing sarcoma, 15 (13.8 %) cases were FISH-positive without an identifiable EWSR1 fusion transcript, 4 (3.7%) were FISH-negative but RT–PCR positive and 4 (3.7%) were negative for both. FISH positivity for DSRCT, MLPS, EMC, AFH and CCS was 86.3%, 4.3%, 58.5%, 60.0% and 87.9%, respectively. A positive FISH result led to diagnostic change in 40 (19.0%) EWSR1-rearranged cases. 13 FISH-positive cases remained unclassifiable.

Conclusions:

FISH is more sensitive for identifying EWSR1 rearrangements than RT–PCR. However, there can be significant morphologic and immunohistochemical overlap between groups of EWSR1-rearranged neoplasms, with important prognostic and therapeutic implications. FISH and RT–PCR should be used as complementary modalities in diagnosing EWSR1-rearranged neoplasms, but as tumour groups harbouring EWSR1 rearrangements are increasingly characterised and because given translocations involving EWSR1 and its partner genes are not always specific for tumour types, it is critical that these are evaluated by specialist soft tissue surgical pathologists noting the morphologic and immunohistochemical context. As RT–PCR using commercial primers is limited to only the most prevalent EWSR1 fusion transcripts, the incorporation of high-throughput sequencing technologies into the standard diagnostic repertoire to assess for multiple molecular abnormalities of soft tissue tumours in parallel (including detection of newly characterised Ewing sarcoma-like tumours) might be the most effective and efficient means of ancillary diagnosis in future.

Gross examination and reporting of soft tissue tumours: evaluation of compliance with the UK Royal College of Pathologists soft tissue sarcoma dataset

Aims

Soft tissue tumours are a heterogeneous group of neoplasms that can arise at almost every anatomical site. As they often show similar clinical and radiological findings, histology is the definitive diagnostic method and it is crucial that the surgical pathology report contains accurate, useful information for management and prognostication. The soft tissue sarcoma minimum dataset produced by the Royal College of Pathologists in the UK outlines a structure for handling and reporting soft tissue tumours, including the core data required, and aiding pathologists in forming a consistent reporting approach.

Methods

We assessed the information in surgical pathology reports for soft tissue lesions at a tertiary soft tissue centre, in 1 year prior to the development of this dataset, and 1 year after its release, to audit the comparative adequacy of macroscopic and microscopic information provided, and to assess for differences in reporting since the advent of routine ancillary molecular diagnostic testing.

Results and conclusions

We found that while essential information was always included in reports, more specific details contributing to better quality reports such as more detailed macroscopic descriptions and a higher proportion of clinical summaries with radiological correlation were included in 2011 than 2006, despite increasing workload. Specimen handling, particularly of core biopsies, was also improved, reflecting the increasing need to conserve the maximum amount of patient material for molecular investigations.

Gene fusions in soft tissue tumors: Recurrent and overlapping pathogenetic themes

Gene fusions have been described in approximately one-third of soft tissue tumors (STT); of the 142 different fusions that have been reported, more than half are recurrent in the same histologic subtype. These gene fusions constitute pivotal driver mutations, and detailed studies of their cellular effects have provided important knowledge about pathogenetic mechanisms in STT. Furthermore, most fusions are strongly associated with a particular histotype, serving as ideal molecular diagnostic markers. In recent years, it has also become apparent that some chimeric proteins, directly or indirectly, constitute excellent treatment targets, making the detection of gene fusions in STT ever more important. Indeed, pharmacological treatment of STT displaying fusions that activate protein kinases, such as ALK and ROS1, or growth factors, such as PDGFB, is already in clinical use. However, the vast majority (52/78) of recurrent gene fusions create structurally altered and/or deregulated transcription factors, and a small but growing subset develops through rearranged chromatin regulators. The present review provides an overview of the spectrum of currently recognized gene fusions in STT, and, on the basis of the protein class involved, the mechanisms by which they exert their oncogenic effect are discussed.

Evaluation of Molecular and Immunohistochemical Adjunct Modalities in the Diagnosis of Soft Tissue Neoplasms

The accurate diagnosis of soft tissue neoplasms has crucial therapeutic and prognostic importance. There is frequent morphologic overlap between entities, and ancillary modalities are used in the vast majority of diagnoses. Immunohistochemistry is rapid and inexpensive, and in addition to the older markers that mainly detected cytoplasmic proteins, antibodies can indirectly detect tumor-specific genetic and molecular abnormalities. The use of molecular diagnostic techniques is now widespread, with molecular services often integrated into routine histopathology laboratories; as their cost and turnaround times begin to parallel those for immunohistochemistry, we compared the usefulness of ancillary immunohistochemistry, molecular genetic, and molecular cytogenetic techniques in the diagnosis of soft tissue lesions. We evaluated the number and contribution of immunohistochemical tests and panels and of ancillary molecular techniques in the primary histopathologic diagnosis of 150 soft tissue lesions. Ninety of 150 cases required either only one immunohistochemical panel or minimal immunohistochemistry for diagnosis, while 39/150 required 2 to 4 panels. In 5/150, ancillary molecular tests alone (without immunohistochemistry) were diagnostically sufficient. The majority of cases required one immunohistochemical panel for diagnosis, with a smaller proportion requiring a second, and a minority requiring a third or fourth (which mainly comprised neoplasms for which the final diagnosis was uncertain). Certain neoplasms required both extensive immunohistochemistry and ancillary molecular testing, despite which the final diagnosis was inconclusive. Ancillary molecular techniques now make a significant contribution to soft tissue tumor diagnosis, being required in over one third (52/150) of cases, and were useful in confirming or excluding tumors that were not possible to conclusively diagnose with histology and immunohistochemistry. Only a small proportion of soft tissue neoplasms (16/150; all benign) did not require immunohistochemistry or ancillary molecular methods, with morphology alone being sufficient for diagnosis.

Cytopathologic features of epithelioid inflammatory myofibroblastic sarcoma with correlation of histopathology, immunohistochemistry, and molecular cytogenetic analysis

BACKGROUND

Epithelioid inflammatory myofibroblastic sarcoma (E-IMS) is a recently established rare variant of inflammatory myofibroblastic tumor. It is characterized by a distinctive constellation of clinical, pathological, and molecular features, including a nearly exclusive intraabdominal location, strong male predilection, aggressive clinical course, predominance of epithelioid tumor cells, and Ran-binding protein 2 (RANBP2)-anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK) fusion in the majority of cases. To the authors' knowledge, the cytologic features of E-IMS have not been described to date.

METHODS

Cases of E-IMS that had corresponding cytology were searched. Six cytology samples (1 fine-needle aspiration sample, 2 imprint samples, and 3 effusion fluids) containing tumor cells were identified in 5 patients with E-IMS.

RESULTS

The cytomorphology included large monotonous epithelioid cells arranged in loose aggregates or singly, with admixed myxoid stroma, and an inflammatory background rich in neutrophils. The tumor cells had a large, round, eccentric nucleus with vesicular chromatin, prominent nucleoli, and moderate amounts of pale cytoplasm. Delicate thin-walled branching vessels traversing tumor aggregates was a prominent feature in a fine-needle aspiration sample. Immunohistochemically, ALK was positive in all 5 tumors, with a nuclear membranous staining pattern noted in 3 cases and a cytoplasmic pattern observed in the other 2 cases. ALK rearrangement was confirmed in all 5 tumors by molecular genetic studies.

CONCLUSIONS

The cytologic features of E-IMS recapitulate its histologic characteristics. E-IMS merits inclusion in the differential diagnosis of any intraabdominal, large epithelioid cell neoplasm. Confirmation of ALK rearrangement is advisable because patients may benefit from targeted therapies.