1
|
Blackman A, Rees AC, Bowers RR, Jones CM, Vaena SG, Clark MA, Carter S, Villamor ED, Evans D, Emanuel AJ, Fullbright G, O’Malley MS, Carpenter RL, Long DT, Spruill LS, Romeo MJ, Orr BC, Helke KL, Delaney JR. MYC is Sufficient to Generate Mid-Life High-Grade Serous Ovarian and Uterine Serous Carcinomas in a p53-R270H Mouse Model. CANCER RESEARCH COMMUNICATIONS 2024; 4:2525-2538. [PMID: 39225558 PMCID: PMC11425777 DOI: 10.1158/2767-9764.crc-24-0144] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/07/2024] [Revised: 07/12/2024] [Accepted: 08/27/2024] [Indexed: 09/04/2024]
Abstract
Genetically engineered mouse models (GEMM) have fundamentally changed how ovarian cancer etiology, early detection, and treatment are understood. MYC, an oncogene, is amongst the most amplified genes in high-grade serous ovarian cancer (HGSOC), but it has not previously been utilized to drive HGSOC GEMMs. We coupled Myc and dominant-negative mutant p53-R270H with a fallopian tube epithelium (FTE)-specific promoter Ovgp1 to generate a new GEMM of HGSOC. Female mice developed lethal cancer at an average of 14.5 months. Histopathologic examination of mice revealed HGSOC characteristics, including nuclear p53 and nuclear MYC in clusters of cells within the FTE and ovarian surface epithelium. Unexpectedly, nuclear p53 and MYC clustered cell expression was also identified in the uterine luminal epithelium, possibly from intraepithelial metastasis from the FTE. Extracted tumor cells exhibited strong loss of heterozygosity at the p53 locus, leaving the mutant allele. Copy-number alterations in these cancer cells were prevalent, disrupting a large fraction of genes. Transcriptome profiles most closely matched human HGSOC and serous endometrial cancer. Taken together, these results demonstrate that the Myc and Trp53-R270H transgenes were able to recapitulate many phenotypic hallmarks of HGSOC through the utilization of strictly human-mimetic genetic hallmarks of HGSOC. This new mouse model enables further exploration of ovarian cancer pathogenesis, particularly in the 50% of HGSOC which lack homology-directed repair mutations. Histologic and transcriptomic findings are consistent with the hypothesis that uterine serous cancer may originate from the FTE. SIGNIFICANCE Mouse models using transgenes which generate spontaneous cancers are essential tools to examine the etiology of human diseases. Here, the first Myc-driven spontaneous model is described as a valid HGSOC model. Surprisingly, aspects of uterine serous carcinoma were also observed in this model.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alexandra Blackman
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, South Carolina.
| | - Amy C. Rees
- Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, South Carolina.
| | - Robert R. Bowers
- Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, South Carolina.
| | - Christian M. Jones
- Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, South Carolina.
| | - Silvia G. Vaena
- Hollings Cancer Center, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, South Carolina.
| | - Madison A. Clark
- Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, South Carolina.
| | - Shelby Carter
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, South Carolina.
| | - Evan D. Villamor
- Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, South Carolina.
| | - Della Evans
- Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, South Carolina.
| | - Anthony J. Emanuel
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, South Carolina.
| | - George Fullbright
- Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, South Carolina.
| | - Matthew S. O’Malley
- Department of Medical Sciences, Indiana University Bloomington, Bloomington, Indiana.
| | - Richard L. Carpenter
- Department of Medical Sciences, Indiana University Bloomington, Bloomington, Indiana.
- Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Indiana University Bloomington, Bloomington, Indiana.
| | - David T. Long
- Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, South Carolina.
| | - Laura S. Spruill
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, South Carolina.
| | - Martin J. Romeo
- Hollings Cancer Center, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, South Carolina.
| | - Brian C. Orr
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, South Carolina.
| | - Kristi L. Helke
- Department of Comparative Medicine, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, South Carolina.
| | - Joe R. Delaney
- Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, South Carolina.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Blackman A, Rees AC, Bowers RR, Jones CM, Vaena SG, Clark MA, Carter S, Villamor ED, Evans D, Emanuel AJ, Fullbright G, Long DT, Spruill L, Romeo MJ, Helke KL, Delaney JR. MYC is sufficient to generate mid-life high-grade serous ovarian and uterine serous carcinomas in a p53-R270H mouse model. BIORXIV : THE PREPRINT SERVER FOR BIOLOGY 2024:2024.01.24.576924. [PMID: 38352443 PMCID: PMC10862747 DOI: 10.1101/2024.01.24.576924] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 03/02/2024]
Abstract
Genetically engineered mouse models (GEMM) have fundamentally changed how ovarian cancer etiology, early detection, and treatment is understood. However, previous GEMMs of high-grade serous ovarian cancer (HGSOC) have had to utilize genetics rarely or never found in human HGSOC to yield ovarian cancer within the lifespan of a mouse. MYC, an oncogene, is amongst the most amplified genes in HGSOC, but it has not previously been utilized to drive HGSOC GEMMs. We coupled Myc and dominant negative mutant p53-R270H with a fallopian tube epithelium-specific promoter Ovgp1 to generate a new GEMM of HGSOC. Female mice developed lethal cancer at an average of 15.1 months. Histopathological examination of mice revealed HGSOC characteristics including nuclear p53 and nuclear MYC in clusters of cells within the fallopian tube epithelium and ovarian surface epithelium. Unexpectedly, nuclear p53 and MYC clustered cell expression was also identified in the uterine luminal epithelium, possibly from intraepithelial metastasis from the fallopian tube epithelium (FTE). Extracted tumor cells exhibited strong loss of heterozygosity at the p53 locus, leaving the mutant allele. Copy number alterations in these cancer cells were prevalent, disrupting a large fraction of genes. Transcriptome profiles most closely matched human HGSOC and serous endometrial cancer. Taken together, these results demonstrate the Myc and Trp53-R270H transgene was able to recapitulate many phenotypic hallmarks of HGSOC through the utilization of strictly human-mimetic genetic hallmarks of HGSOC. This new mouse model enables further exploration of ovarian cancer pathogenesis, particularly in the 50% of HGSOC which lack homology directed repair mutations. Histological and transcriptomic findings are consistent with the hypothesis that uterine serous cancer may originate from the fallopian tube epithelium.
Collapse
|
3
|
Rodriquez M, Felix AS, Brett MA, Samimi G, Duggan MA. Associations Between Intraluminal Tumor Cell Involvement in Serially Examined Fallopian Tubes and Endometrial Carcinoma Characteristics and Outcomes. Int J Gynecol Pathol 2022; 41:520-529. [PMID: 34380972 PMCID: PMC8831668 DOI: 10.1097/pgp.0000000000000819] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
Abstract
Approximately 12% of routinely examined fallopian tubes of endometrial carcinoma (EC) cases have intraluminal tumor cells (ILTCs). ILTC associations with EC characteristics and outcomes are understudied, and unknown in serially examined and embedded tubal fimbriae. Glass slides of serially examined and embedded tubal fimbriae for 371 EC cases were independently reviewed by 2 pathologists who recorded ILTC presence and characterized them as mucosal if involved and floating if not. Disagreements were reviewed by a third pathologist, and agreement between any 2 determined final ILTC status. Clinico-pathologic associations and ILTC presence were tested for significance ( P <0.05) by univariable analysis, and stage and histotype determinants were included in a multivariable analysis. The Kaplan-Meier estimates and log-rank tests compared overall and EC-specific survival, and Cox proportional regression estimated hazard ratios. ILTCs were present in 56 (15.1%) cases: 30 mucosal and 26 floating. FIGO stage 3/4, lymph-vascular space invasion, deep myometrial invasion, nonendometrioid histotype, and adjunctive chemotherapy were significantly associated with ILTC presence, and only stage was significant in the multivariable analysis. Overall, 61 women died: 30 of whom died of EC. ILTCs were nonsignificantly associated with higher overall and EC-specific mortality and mucosal ILTCs had the highest hazard ratios (1.64 and 1.89, respectively). Serially examined and embedded tubal fimbriae have a higher prevalence of ILTCs than routinely examined tubes, and high FIGO stage is an independent determinant. A prognostic effect was not found, but the higher trending hazard ratios suggest additional study is needed to determine whether ILTCs and in particular mucosal ILTCs adversely affect prognosis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Monica Rodriquez
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada
| | - Ashley S. Felix
- Division of Epidemiology, the Ohio State University College of Public Health, Columbus, Ohio, USA
| | - Mary Anne Brett
- Department of Pathology, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
| | - Goli Samimi
- Division of Cancer Prevention, Breast and Gynecologic Cancer Research Group, National Cancer Institute, Rockville, Maryland, USA
| | - Máire A. Duggan
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Zhang C, Zheng W. High-grade endometrial carcinomas: Morphologic spectrum and molecular classification. Semin Diagn Pathol 2021; 39:176-186. [PMID: 34852949 DOI: 10.1053/j.semdp.2021.11.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/13/2021] [Accepted: 11/18/2021] [Indexed: 11/11/2022]
Abstract
High-grade endometrial carcinoma (HGEC) is a heterogeneous group of tumors with various morphologic, genetic, and clinical characteristics. Morphologically, HGEC includes high-grade endometrioid carcinoma, serous carcinoma, clear cell carcinoma, undifferentiated/dedifferentiated carcinoma, and carcinosarcoma. The morphologic classification has been used for prognostication and treatment decisions. However, patient management based on morphologic classification is limited by suboptimal interobserver reproducibility, variable clinical outcomes observed within the same histotype, and frequent discordant histotyping/grading between biopsy and hysterectomy specimens. Recent studies from The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) Research Network established four distinct molecular subtypes: POLE-ultramutated, microsatellite unstable, copy number high, and copy number low groups. Compared to histotyping, the TCGA molecular classification appears superior in risk stratification. The best prognosis is seen in the POLE-ultramutated group and the worst in copy number high group, while the prognosis in the microsatellite unstable and copy number low groups is in between. The TCGA subtyping is more reproducible and shows a better concordance between endometrial biopsy and resection specimens. It has now become apparent that the molecular classification can supplement histotyping in patient management. This article provides an overview of the pathologic diagnosis/differential diagnosis of HGEC and the TCGA classification of endometrial cancers, with the clinical significance and applications of TCGA classification briefly discussed when appropriate.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Cunxian Zhang
- Department of Pathology, Kent Hospital, 455 Toll Gate Road, Warwick, Rhode Island 02886, United States of America; Department of Pathology, Women & Infants Hospital of Rhode Island, 101 Dudley Street, Providence, Rhode Island 02905, United States of America; Department of Pathology, Warren Alpert Medical School, Brown University, Providence, Rhode Island 02912, United States of America.
| | - Wenxin Zheng
- Department of Pathology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Harold C. Simmons Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, 5323 Harry Hines Blvd, Dallas, TX 75390, United States of America
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Han J, Kim HS. Abdominopelvic Metastasis of Endometrial Serous Carcinoma Initially Misdiagnosed as Early-Stage Low-Grade Endometrioid Carcinoma: The Importance of Recognizing Minimal Uterine Serous Carcinoma. Case Rep Oncol 2020; 13:1537-1544. [PMID: 33564295 PMCID: PMC7841739 DOI: 10.1159/000511701] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/11/2020] [Accepted: 09/20/2020] [Indexed: 11/24/2022] Open
Abstract
Minimal uterine serous carcinomas (MUSCs) include serous carcinomas with invasion confined to the endometrium (superficial serous carcinoma) and those without stromal invasion (serous endometrial intraepithelial carcinoma). Although these tumors are confined to the endometrium proper, they have highly metastatic potential for disseminating to extra-uterine sites. We report here a case of MUSC that was initially misdiagnosed as early-stage low-grade endometrioid carcinoma but later metastasized to the abdominopelvic peritoneum. The patient was a 61-year-old woman who was diagnosed with grade 1 endometrioid carcinoma of the endometrium and underwent total hysterectomy. Because the tumor was confined to the endometrium (International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics stage IA), no further treatment was performed. However, several metastatic tumor masses were detected in the vaginal stump and abdominopelvic peritoneum 7 years after the surgery. Histologically, the metastatic tumor tissues showed high-grade carcinoma. A review of previous hysterectomy slides showed multiple separate foci of atypical glandular proliferation measuring up to 0.8 cm in the greatest dimension and consisting of markedly atypical cells involving the surface and atrophic glands. The tumor showed a predominantly glandular architecture without evident papillary growth or stromal invasion. However, it had large, pleomorphic nuclei showing a high nuclear-to-cytoplasmic ratio, conspicuous eosinophilic nucleoli, and numerous mitotic figures. Characteristically, the tumor showed marked nuclear atypia immediately appreciated at low magnification in the background of well-formed glandular structures, indicating a significant discordance between nuclear and architectural features. On immunostaining, both the uterine and metastatic tumor tissues exhibited diffuse and strong p16 expression and mutant pattern of p53 expression, confirming the diagnosis of serous carcinoma. In summary, the case findings support that failure to preoperatively recognize high-risk endometrial carcinoma is associated with worse outcomes. Complete surgical staging and accurate pathological diagnosis are critical for patients with serous carcinoma even at the early clinical stage.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jiheun Han
- Department of Pathology and Translational Genomics, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Hyun-Soo Kim
- Department of Pathology and Translational Genomics, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Celik B, Bulut T, Yalcin AD. Tissue HE4 Expression Discriminates the Ovarian Serous Carcinoma but Not the Uterine Serous Carcinoma Patients. A New Adjunct to the Origin of the Tumor Site. Pathol Oncol Res 2020; 26:1145-1151. [PMID: 31165997 DOI: 10.1007/s12253-019-00675-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/11/2019] [Accepted: 05/23/2019] [Indexed: 02/05/2023]
Abstract
Both uterine serous carcinoma (USC) and ovarian serous carcinoma (OSC) are presented at advanced stage at the first admittion and dissseminated disease makes the anatomical site of the tumor origin imposible. CA125 and p53 are reliable markers that are useful for differentiating both uterine serous and ovarian serous carcinoma from their most common subtypes (endometrioid type carcinoma of ovary and uterus) but so far there is no histopathologic marker that differentiates USC from OSC. On the other hand, Trastuzumab (Herceptin) increases progression-free survival among USC patients, but not OSC patients and makes the histopathologically assigning the origin of the tumor important. So, the aim of this study was to evaluate the immunohistopathological discriminative value of the human epididymis secretory protein 4 (HE4) between OSC and USC patients. Patients with a diagnosis of OSC and UTC were enrolled. HE4 expression was evaluated by immunohistochemistry. The results were compared between groups. Of the tumor tissues studied, HE4 immunostaining was seen in the majority of ovarian serous carcinoma cases (89.65%), while endomatrial serous carcinoma cases were devoid of HE4 immunostaining. HE4 immunostaining was seen in 39.1% uterin serous carcinoma cases and this difference was statistically significant (p = 0.001). Our study demonstrated for the first time the potential of HE4 expression to predict the anatomical site of tumor origin. HE4 is a novel tumor marker that differentiates USC from OSC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Betul Celik
- Pathology Department, Health Science University, Antalya Hospital, Antalya, Turkey.
- Department of Pathology, Training Hospital, Varlik Mah, 07100, Antalya, Turkey.
| | - Tangul Bulut
- Pathology Department, Health Science University, Antalya Hospital, Antalya, Turkey
| | - Arzu Didem Yalcin
- Immunology Unit, Health Science University, Antalya Hospital, Antalya, Turkey
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Seidman JD, Krishnan J. High-grade Pelvic Serous Carcinoma Within the Fallopian Tube Lumen: Real or Artifact? Int J Gynecol Pathol 2019; 39:460-467. [PMID: 31789680 DOI: 10.1097/pgp.0000000000000649] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
Abstract
Tumor cells are occasionally observed in the lumen in histologic sections of the fallopian tube from women with gynecologic cancer. There is some evidence that this finding may be important in endometrial cancer, but its significance is unknown in women with extrauterine pelvic serous carcinomas (tubo-ovarian high-grade serous carcinoma). Fallopian tube sections from 213 women with extrauterine pelvic serous carcinoma were reviewed, and luminal tumor cells were correlated with clinical and pathologic features. Intraluminal tumor cells were found in 84 patients (39%). The presence or absence of luminal tumor cells correlated significantly with serous tubal intraepithelial carcinoma (52% and 33%, respectively, P=0.004), tubal lymphatic invasion (32% and 12%, respectively, P=0.0002), and number of tube sections reviewed (6.6 and 4.9 for lumen-positive and lumen-negative cases, respectively, P=0.0056). There was no correlation with the presence of ascites, peritoneal cytopathologic findings, lymph node metastases, or FIGO stage. In the setting of pelvic serous carcinoma, a substantial portion of fallopian tube tissue is often distorted, fibrotic, and difficult to identify. Since the identification of luminal tumor cells, serous tubal intraepithelial carcinoma and tubal lymphatic invasion all depend on identification of fallopian tube tissue, these correlates with luminal tumor cells could be a result of a higher likelihood of their observation when tubal tissue can be more readily identified and may not necessarily reflect a biologically important phenomenon. It remains unclear whether and in what proportion this finding reflects an artifact of specimen handling.
Collapse
|
8
|
Abstract
Although ovarian serous carcinoma is a well-studied human gynecologic malignancy, this high-grade tumor remains fatal. The main purpose of this review is to summarize the accumulated evidence on serous malignant tumors and to clarify the unresolved issues. We discuss the 8 dichotomies of serous carcinoma: high grade versus low grade, ovarian versus extraovarian primary, extrauterine versus uterine primary, sporadic versus hereditary, orthodox versus alternative histology, p53 overexpression versus complete absence of immunophenotype, TP53-mutated versus intact precursor, and therapy responsive versus refractory. In addition, we summarize the molecular classification of high-grade serous carcinoma. This review would lead readers to rapid and parallel developments in understanding high-grade serous carcinoma.
Collapse
|
9
|
Stewart CJR, Crum CP, McCluggage WG, Park KJ, Rutgers JK, Oliva E, Malpica A, Parkash V, Matias-Guiu X, Ronnett BM. Guidelines to Aid in the Distinction of Endometrial and Endocervical Carcinomas, and the Distinction of Independent Primary Carcinomas of the Endometrium and Adnexa From Metastatic Spread Between These and Other Sites. Int J Gynecol Pathol 2019; 38 Suppl 1:S75-S92. [PMID: 30550485 PMCID: PMC6296834 DOI: 10.1097/pgp.0000000000000553] [Citation(s) in RCA: 43] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
In most cases of suspected endometrial neoplasia tumor origin can be correctly assigned according to a combination of clinical, radiologic, and pathologic features, even when the latter are based upon the examination of relatively small biopsy samples. However there are well-recognized exceptions to this rule which continue to create diagnostic difficulty, and sometimes difficulties persist even after the detailed examination of resection specimens. Among the most common problems encountered in practice are the distinction of primary endometrial and primary endocervical adenocarcinomas, and the determination of tumor origin when there is synchronous, multifocal involvement of gynecologic tract sites, for example the endometrium and the ovary. However, accurate diagnosis in these cases is important because this has significant staging, management and prognostic implications. In this review we discuss the value and limitations of key morphologic, immunophenotypic and molecular findings in these diagnostic scenarios.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Colin J R Stewart
- Department of Histopathology, King Edward Memorial Hospital and School for Women's and Infants' Health, University of Western Australia, Perth, Western Australia, Australia (C.J.R.S.) Department of Pathology, Brigham and Women's Hospital (C.P.C.) Department of Pathology, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School (E.O.), Boston, Massachusetts Department of Pathology, Belfast Health and Social Care Trust, Belfast, Northern Ireland, UK (W.G.M.) Department of Pathology, Memorial-Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York (K.J.P.) Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, California (J.K.R.) Department of Pathology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas (A.M.) Department of Pathology, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut (V.P.) Pathological Oncology Group and Pathology Department, Hospital Arnau de Vilanova, Lleida, Spain (X.M.-G.) Departments of Pathology and Gynecology and Obstetrics, The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland (B.M.R.)
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
10
|
Ogane N, Hori SI, Yano M, Katoh T, Kamoshida S, Kato H, Kameda Y, Yasuda M. Preponderance of endometrial carcinoma in elderly patients. Mol Clin Oncol 2018; 9:269-273. [PMID: 30155248 PMCID: PMC6109667 DOI: 10.3892/mco.2018.1680] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/08/2018] [Accepted: 07/16/2018] [Indexed: 11/05/2022] Open
Abstract
Elderly patients with endometrial carcinoma (EMC) are considered to have a poor clinical outcome. The present study included 79 patients aged ≥70 years with EMC stage I or II according to the International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics classification, and it was conducted to analyse the clinicopathological significance of histological type (I or II), depth of myometrial invasion (<1/2 or ≥1/2), lymphovascular invasion (+ or -) and immunohistochemical profile. The aim of these analyses was to determine whether these factors may adversely affect the patient outcome and the underlying mechanisms. The immunohistochemical markers used were estrogen receptor (ER), Ki-67 and p53. The expression of these markers was evaluated as high (+) or low (-). Accordingly, the patients were divided into groups as follows: 54 cases type I vs. 25 cases type II; 48 cases with myometrial invasion <1/2 vs. 31 cases without myometrial invasion ≥1/2; 63 cases with lymphovascular invasion vs. 16 cases without lymphovascular invasion; 57 cases with ER (+) vs. 22 cases with ER (-); 24 cases with Ki-67 (+) vs. 55 cases with Ki-67 (-); and 29 cases with p53 (+) vs. 50 cases with p53 (-). In conclusion, close attention must be paid to elderly patients with EMC due to the tumor's intrinsic aggressiveness, which may include the ER (-) and p53 (+) pattern as an independent poor prognostic factor.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Naoki Ogane
- Department of Pathology, Kanagawa Prefectural Ashigarakami Hospital, Matsuda, Kanagawa 258-0003, Japan
| | - Shin-Ichi Hori
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Seto Hospital, Tokorozawa, Saitama 359-1128, Japan
| | - Mitsutake Yano
- Department of Pathology, Saitama Medical University International Medical Center, Hidaka, Saitama 350-1298, Japan
| | - Tomomi Katoh
- Department of Pathology, Saitama Medical University International Medical Center, Hidaka, Saitama 350-1298, Japan
| | - Shingo Kamoshida
- Laboratory of Pathology, Department of Medical Biophysics, Kobe University Graduate School of Health Sciences, Kobe, Hyogo 654-0142, Japan
| | - Hisamori Kato
- Department of Gynecology, Kanagawa Cancer Center, Yokohama, Kanagawa 241-8515, Japan
| | - Yoichi Kameda
- Department of Pathology, Kanagawa Prefectural Ashigarakami Hospital, Matsuda, Kanagawa 258-0003, Japan
| | - Masanori Yasuda
- Department of Pathology, Saitama Medical University International Medical Center, Hidaka, Saitama 350-1298, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
High-grade serous carcinoma with discordant p53 signature: report of a case with new insight regarding high-grade serous carcinogenesis. Diagn Pathol 2018; 13:24. [PMID: 29703236 PMCID: PMC5923005 DOI: 10.1186/s13000-018-0702-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/09/2018] [Accepted: 04/18/2018] [Indexed: 12/12/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Although p53 signature, benign-appearing epithelial cells with p53 diffuse expression, is frequently found in the fallopian tubes, the clinical and pathological significance of this lesion in the case of high-grade serous carcinoma (HGSC) patients still remains unclear. Case presentation A 56-year-old woman was referred to the gynecologist on account of abdominal distention. Since radiological and serological workup suggested that her illness was due to advanced ovarian cancer (FIGO Stage IVB), she received neoadjuvant chemotherapy, and the clinical evaluation of the chemotherapeutic response was a partial response. She underwent total hysterectomy with bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy, omentectomy, and intra-pelvic and para-aortic lymphadenectomy. Histologically, the cancer cells showed high-grade nuclear atypia and spread into the bilateral ovaries, omentum, uterine serosa, and left fallopian tube. The cancer cells showed complete absence of p53 but overexpressed p16, whereas some of benign-appearing tubal epithelial cells overexpressed p53 but lacked p16 expression. The results of direct sequence analysis revealed that the ovarian cancer contains a 1 bp deletion in exon 8 of TP53. Finally, the histological diagnosis of HGSC with discordant p53 signature was made. Interestingly, nuclear expression of γ-H2AX, a well-known marker of DNA damage, was not only observed in both p53 aberrantly-expressing lesions but also the benign-appearing tubal epithelium without p53 overexpression. After the histological confirmation, she received adjuvant chemotherapy and has been in disease-free condition without any detectable tumor for 5 months. Conclusion Recent evidence suggests that p53 signature is the putative precursor of p53 overexpression-type HGSC. Because the putative precursors of the other p53 immunophenotypical HGSC are not proposed, we presume γ-H2AX-expressing cells without p53 overexpression may be a potent candidate of null-type TP53-mutated tubal cells, which are named “γ-H2AX responsive foci.”
Collapse
|
12
|
Falconer H, Yin L, Altman D. Association between tubal ligation and endometrial cancer risk: A Swedish population-based cohort study. Int J Cancer 2018; 143:16-21. [DOI: 10.1002/ijc.31287] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/29/2017] [Revised: 12/19/2017] [Accepted: 01/09/2018] [Indexed: 12/31/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Henrik Falconer
- Department of Medical Epidemiology and Biostatistics; Karolinska Institutet; Stockholm Sweden
- Department of Women's and Children's Health; Karolinska Institutet; Stockholm Sweden
- Division of Obstetrics and Gynecology; Karolinska University Hospital; Stockholm Sweden
| | - Li Yin
- Department of Medical Epidemiology and Biostatistics; Karolinska Institutet; Stockholm Sweden
| | - Daniel Altman
- Department of Clinical Sciences; Karolinska Institutet Danderyd Hospital, Karolinska Institutet; Stockholm Sweden
- Department of Statistics and Quantitative Methods; University of Milano-Bicocca; Milan Italy
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Does a p53 "Wild-type" Immunophenotype Exclude a Diagnosis of Endometrial Serous Carcinoma? Adv Anat Pathol 2018; 25:61-70. [PMID: 28945609 DOI: 10.1097/pap.0000000000000171] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/08/2023]
Abstract
An aberrant p53 immunophenotype may be identified in several histotypes of endometrial carcinoma, and is accordingly recognized to lack diagnostic specificity in and of itself. However, based on the high frequency with which p53 aberrations have historically been identified in endometrial serous carcinoma, a mutation-type immunophenotype is considered to be highly sensitive for the histotype. Using an illustrative case study and a review of the literature, we explore a relatively routine diagnostic question: whether the negative predictive value of a wild-type p53 immunophenotype for serous carcinoma is absolute, that is, whether a p53-wild type immunophenotype is absolutely incompatible with a diagnosis of serous carcinoma. The case is an advanced stage endometrial carcinoma that was reproducibly classified by pathologists from 3 institutions as serous carcinoma based on its morphologic features. By immunohistochemistry, the tumor was p53-wild type (DO-7 clone), diffusely positive for p16 (block positivity), and showed retained expression of PTEN, MSH2, MSH6, MLH1, and PMS2. Next generation sequencing showed that there indeed was an underlying mutation in TP53 (D393fs*78, R213*). The tumor was microsatellite stable, had a low mutational burden (4 mutations per MB), and displayed no mutations in the exonuclease domain of DNA polymerase epsilon (POLE) gene. Other genomic alterations included RB1 mutation (R46fs*19), amplifications in MYST3 and CRKL, and ARID1A deletion (splice site 5125-94_5138del108). A review of the recent literature identified 5 studies in which a total of 259 cases of serous carcinoma were whole-exome sequenced. The average TP53 mutational rate in endometrial serous carcinoma was only 75% (range, 60 to 88). A total of 12 (33%) of 36 immunohistochemical studies reported a p53-aberrant rate of <80% in endometrial serous carcinoma. We discuss in detail several potential explanations that may underlie the scenario of serous carcinoma-like morphology combined with p53-wild-type immunophenotype, including analytic limitations, a nonserous histotype displaying morphologic mimicry of serous carcinoma, and true biological phenomena (including the possibility of a TP53-independent pathway of endometrial serous carcinogenesis). Ultimately, our central thematic question is provisionally answered in the negative. At present, the available data would not support a categorical conclusion that a p53 alteration is a necessary and obligate component in the genesis and/or diagnosis of endometrial serous carcinoma. On the basis of their collective experience, the authors proffer some recommendations on the use of p53 immunohistochemistry in the histotyping of endometrial carcinomas.
Collapse
|
14
|
Casey L, Köbel M, Ganesan R, Tam S, Prasad R, Böhm S, Lockley M, Jeyarajah AJ, Brockbank E, Faruqi A, Gilks CB, Singh N. A comparison of p53 and WT1 immunohistochemical expression patterns in tubo-ovarian high-grade serous carcinoma before and after neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Histopathology 2017; 71:736-742. [PMID: 28570008 DOI: 10.1111/his.13272] [Citation(s) in RCA: 22] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/01/2017] [Revised: 05/28/2017] [Accepted: 05/30/2017] [Indexed: 01/19/2023]
Abstract
AIMS The treatment of patients with tubo-ovarian high-grade serous carcinoma (HGSC) is increasingly based on diagnosis on small biopsy samples, and the first surgical sample is often taken post-chemotherapy. p53 and WT1 are important diagnostic markers for HGSC. The effect of neoadjuvant chemotherapy on p53 and WT1 expression has not been widely studied. We aimed to compare p53 and WT1 expression in paired pre-chemotherapy and post-chemotherapy samples of HGSC. METHODS AND RESULTS Immunohistochemistry (IHC) was carried out for p53 and WT1 on paired omental HGSC samples pre-chemotherapy and post-chemotherapy. p53 IHC was recorded as normal (wild-type) or abnormal (mutation-type), and was further classified as overexpression, complete absence, or cytoplasmic. WT1 IHC was classified as positive or negative. A subset of cases were further assessed for the extent of nuclear immunoreactivity of WT1 by use of the H-score. Fifty-seven paired samples were stained with p53. Fifty-six of 57 (98%) cases showed mutation-type p53 staining. Pre-chemotherapy and post-chemotherapy IHC results were concordant in 55 of 57 (96%) cases. For WT1, pre-chemotherapy and post-chemotherapy IHC results were concordant in 56 of 58 (97%) cases. In 23 paired WT1 cases, the mean post-treatment H-score decreased from 227 [range 20-298, standard deviation (SD) 64] to 151 (range 0-288, SD 78) (P = 0.0008). CONCLUSIONS Immunohistochemical expression of p53 (abnormal/mutation-type pattern) and WT1 in HGSC is almost universal and is largely concordant before and after chemotherapy. This finding underscores the reliability of these diagnostic markers in small samples and in surgical samples following neoadjuvant chemotherapy, with very few exceptions. A novel finding was the significant diminution in intensity of WT1 staining following chemotherapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Laura Casey
- Department of Cellular Pathology, Barts Health NHS Trust, London, UK
| | - Martin Köbel
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada
| | - Raji Ganesan
- Department of Cellular Pathology, Birmingham Women's Hospital, Birmingham, UK
| | - Simone Tam
- Department of Cellular Pathology, Barts Health NHS Trust, London, UK
| | - Rajeev Prasad
- Department of Cellular Pathology, Queen's Hospital, Romford, UK
| | - Steffen Böhm
- Barts Cancer Institute, Queen Mary University of London, London, UK
| | - Michelle Lockley
- Barts Cancer Institute, Queen Mary University of London, London, UK
| | - Arjun J Jeyarajah
- Department of Gynaecological Oncology, Barts Health NHS Trust, London, UK
| | - Eleanor Brockbank
- Department of Gynaecological Oncology, Barts Health NHS Trust, London, UK
| | - Asma Faruqi
- Department of Cellular Pathology, Barts Health NHS Trust, London, UK
| | - C Blake Gilks
- Department of Anatomic Pathology, Vancouver General Hospital, Vancouver, BC, Canada
| | - Naveena Singh
- Department of Cellular Pathology, Barts Health NHS Trust, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Prior Tubal Ligation Might Influence Metastatic Spread of Nonendometrioid Endometrial Carcinoma. Int J Gynecol Cancer 2017; 26:1092-7. [PMID: 27104940 PMCID: PMC4920272 DOI: 10.1097/igc.0000000000000727] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/25/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE The exfoliation of endometrial carcinoma might intraperitoneally spread through the fallopian tube. We analyzed the influence of prior tubal ligation (TL) in endometrial carcinoma to evaluate whether it can prevent the process and improve patients' survival. METHODS A total of 562 patients with a diagnosis of endometrial carcinoma at the Peking University People's Hospital between July 1995 and June 2012 were enrolled in this study. The patients were divided into 2 groups based on the presence or absence of prior TL. International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics stage distributions, recurrence rates, survival status, and histopathological findings were compared between the 2 groups. Kaplan-Meier estimates and log-rank tests were used to compare the survival status based on TL in the overall population and stratified by histopathological subtypes and International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics stages. Cox models analysis was used to estimate the hazard ratios and 95% confidence intervals for associations between TL and carcinoma-specific mortality. All statistical tests were 2-sided. RESULTS Of the 562 patients, 482 (85.7%) had a diagnosis of endometrioid and 80 patients (14.2%) with nonendometrioid carcinoma. Tubal ligation was associated with negative peritoneal cytology in the total population (P = 0.015) and in patients with endometrioid carcinomas (P = 0.02) but not help to reduce carcinoma-specific mortality (P = 0.095 and P = 0.277, respectively). In the nonendometrioid group, TL was not only associated with negative peritoneal cytology (P = 0.004) but also with lower stage (P < 0.001) and lower recurrence rate(P < 0.005), resulting in improved prognosis (P = 0.022). In Cox models analysis adjusted for covariates, TL was inversely associated with lower endometrial carcinoma-specific mortality (hazard ratio, 0.47; 95% confidence interval, 0.14-2.6). CONCLUSION Tubal ligation was associated with lower positive peritoneal cytology, stages, and recurrence rate, and improved prognosis among patients with nonendometrioid carcinoma. Tubal ligation might influence metastatic spread of nonendometrioid endometrial carcinoma. It could also help to reduce positive peritoneal cytology among patients with endometrioid carcinoma, but lacked prognostic significance.
Collapse
|
16
|
Incidental Serous Tubal Intraepithelial Carcinoma and Non-Neoplastic Conditions of the Fallopian Tubes in Grossly Normal Adnexa: A Clinicopathologic Study of 388 Completely Embedded Cases. Int J Gynecol Pathol 2017; 35:423-9. [PMID: 26630221 DOI: 10.1097/pgp.0000000000000267] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
Abstract
Serous tubal intraepithelial carcinoma (STIC), the putative precursor of the majority of extrauterine high-grade serous carcinomas, has been reported in both high-risk women (those with a germline BRCA mutation, a personal history of breast carcinoma, and/or family history of breast or ovarian carcinoma) and average risk women from the general population. We reviewed grossly normal adnexal specimens from 388 consecutive, unselected women undergoing surgery, including those with germline BRCA mutation (37 patients), personal history of breast cancer or family history of breast/ovarian cancer (74 patients), endometrial cancer (175 patients), and a variety of other conditions (102 patients). Among 111 high-risk cases and 277 non-high-risk cases, 3 STICs were identified (0.8%), all in non-high-risk women (high risk vs. non-high risk: P=not significant). STIC was found in 2 women with nonserous endometrial carcinoma and 1 with complex atypical endometrial hyperplasia. Salpingoliths (mucosal calcifications), found in 9% of high-risk cases, and fimbrial adenofibromas in 9.9% of high-risk cases, were significantly more common in high-risk as compared with non-high-risk women (1.8% and 2.5%, respectively; P<0.007). Mucinous metaplasia was found in 3.1%, salpingitis isthmica nodosa in 3.4%, hemosiderin or pseudoxanthoma cells in 4.9%, and fibrous luminal nodules in 4.1%. None of these latter features differed significantly in the high-risk versus non-high-risk groups. These findings suggest a possible association between STIC and endometrial hyperplasia and carcinoma, and clarify the frequency of non-neoplastic tubal findings in grossly normal fallopian tubes.
Collapse
|
17
|
Müllerian intra-abdominal carcinomatosis in hereditary breast ovarian cancer syndrome: implications for risk-reducing surgery. Fam Cancer 2017; 15:371-84. [PMID: 26875157 DOI: 10.1007/s10689-016-9878-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/14/2022]
Abstract
More than 40 years ago Lynch et al. described several multigenerational breast cancer family pedigrees which demonstrated autosomal dominant inheritance of a trait(s) that increased risks for both breast and ovarian cancers. Mutation carriers in at least 90 % of these hereditary breast ovarian cancer (HBOC) syndrome families have been linked to cancer-associated mutations in the genes BRCA1 and BRCA2. This review focuses on the contributions of Lynch, colleagues and collaborators and pertinent literature, toward defining the HBOC syndrome, the cancer risks that the inherited adverse mutations convey, the gynecologic tissues and organs from which the malignancy may arise to disseminate throughout the pelvic and abdominal organs and peritoneum and how this information can be used to reduce the risk and morbidities of intra-abdominal carcinomatosis in effected individuals.
Collapse
|
18
|
Uterine Serous Carcinomas Frequently Metastasize to the Fallopian Tube and Can Mimic Serous Tubal Intraepithelial Carcinoma. Am J Surg Pathol 2017; 41:161-170. [DOI: 10.1097/pas.0000000000000757] [Citation(s) in RCA: 51] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/27/2022]
|
19
|
Soslow RA. Practical issues related to uterine pathology: staging, frozen section, artifacts, and Lynch syndrome. Mod Pathol 2016; 29 Suppl 1:S59-77. [PMID: 26715174 PMCID: PMC4821462 DOI: 10.1038/modpathol.2015.127] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/16/2015] [Revised: 09/18/2015] [Accepted: 09/26/2015] [Indexed: 12/30/2022]
Abstract
This review covers three areas in endometrial tumor pathology: International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) staging, the use of frozen section, and Lynch syndrome. The section on FIGO staging will emphasize problems that practicing pathologists often confront, such as measuring the depth of myometrial invasion, assessing for the presence of cervical stromal invasion, detecting low-volume lymph node metastases, and recognizing synchronous endometrial and ovarian tumors and artifacts. The frozen section portion of this review will focus on the performance characteristics of intraoperative examination of the uterus to determine tumor grade and depth of myometrial invasion, including suggestions for alternative methods. The last portion of this review will provide an overview of Lynch syndrome and a discussion of the rationale and methods of screening for Lynch syndrome.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Robert A. Soslow
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, Department of Pathology, 1275 York Avenue, New York, NY 10065, Tel. 212-639-5905
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Felix AS, Brinton LA, McMeekin DS, Creasman WT, Mutch D, Cohn DE, Walker JL, Moore RG, Downs LS, Soslow RA, Zaino R, Sherman ME. Relationships of Tubal Ligation to Endometrial Carcinoma Stage and Mortality in the NRG Oncology/ Gynecologic Oncology Group 210 Trial. J Natl Cancer Inst 2015; 107:djv158. [PMID: 26089540 DOI: 10.1093/jnci/djv158] [Citation(s) in RCA: 26] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/18/2014] [Accepted: 05/12/2015] [Indexed: 01/02/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Stage is a critical determinant of treatment among endometrial carcinoma patients; understanding patterns of tumor spread may suggest approaches to improve staging. Specifically, the importance of exfoliation of endometrial carcinoma cells through the fallopian tubes into the peritoneum is ill defined. We assessed the hypothesis that tubal ligation (TL), which should impede transtubal passage of cells, is associated with lower endometrial carcinoma stage at presentation and, consequently, lower mortality. METHODS The NRG Oncology/Gynecologic Oncology Group (GOG) 210 Trial included 4489 endometrial carcinoma patients who completed a risk factor questionnaire that included TL history. Pathology data were derived from clinical reports and central review. We used logistic regression to estimate odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for associations between TL with stage and peritoneal metastasis, overall and by tumor subtype. Cox regression was used to estimate hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals for TL and mortality. All statistical tests were two-sided. RESULTS Compared with stage I, TL was inversely associated with stage III (OR = 0.63, 95% CI = 0.52 to 0.78) and stage IV carcinomas (OR = 0.14, 95% CI = 0.08 to 0.24) overall and among individual tumor subtypes. TL was inversely related to peritoneal metastasis overall (OR = 0.39, 95% CI = 0.22 to 0.68) and among serous carcinomas (OR = 0.28, 95% CI = 0.11 to 0.68). In multivariable models unadjusted for stage, TL was associated with lower endometrial carcinoma-specific mortality (HR = 0.74, 95% CI = 0.61 to 0.91); however, adjustment for stage eliminated the survival advantage. Similar relationships with all-cause mortality were observed. CONCLUSIONS TL is associated with lower stage and mortality among women with aggressive endometrial carcinomas, suggesting transtubal spread is clinically important. Future studies should evaluate whether detection of intraluminal tumor cells is prognostically relevant.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ashley S Felix
- : Hormonal and Reproductive Epidemiology Branch, Division of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics (ASF, LAB) and Cancer Prevention Fellowship Program, Division of Cancer Prevention (ASF), National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD; Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Oklahoma, Oklahoma City, OK (SM, JLW); Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC (WTC); Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO (DM); Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Ohio State University College of Medicine, Columbus, OH (DEC); Women and Infants Hospital/Brown University, Providence, RI (RGM); University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN (LSD); Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY (RAS); Anatomic Pathology, Penn State Milton S. Hersey Medical Center, Hershey, PA (RZ); Breast and Gynecologic Cancer Research Group, Division of Cancer Prevention, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD (MES).
| | - Louise A Brinton
- : Hormonal and Reproductive Epidemiology Branch, Division of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics (ASF, LAB) and Cancer Prevention Fellowship Program, Division of Cancer Prevention (ASF), National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD; Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Oklahoma, Oklahoma City, OK (SM, JLW); Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC (WTC); Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO (DM); Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Ohio State University College of Medicine, Columbus, OH (DEC); Women and Infants Hospital/Brown University, Providence, RI (RGM); University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN (LSD); Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY (RAS); Anatomic Pathology, Penn State Milton S. Hersey Medical Center, Hershey, PA (RZ); Breast and Gynecologic Cancer Research Group, Division of Cancer Prevention, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD (MES)
| | - D Scott McMeekin
- : Hormonal and Reproductive Epidemiology Branch, Division of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics (ASF, LAB) and Cancer Prevention Fellowship Program, Division of Cancer Prevention (ASF), National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD; Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Oklahoma, Oklahoma City, OK (SM, JLW); Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC (WTC); Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO (DM); Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Ohio State University College of Medicine, Columbus, OH (DEC); Women and Infants Hospital/Brown University, Providence, RI (RGM); University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN (LSD); Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY (RAS); Anatomic Pathology, Penn State Milton S. Hersey Medical Center, Hershey, PA (RZ); Breast and Gynecologic Cancer Research Group, Division of Cancer Prevention, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD (MES)
| | - William T Creasman
- : Hormonal and Reproductive Epidemiology Branch, Division of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics (ASF, LAB) and Cancer Prevention Fellowship Program, Division of Cancer Prevention (ASF), National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD; Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Oklahoma, Oklahoma City, OK (SM, JLW); Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC (WTC); Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO (DM); Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Ohio State University College of Medicine, Columbus, OH (DEC); Women and Infants Hospital/Brown University, Providence, RI (RGM); University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN (LSD); Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY (RAS); Anatomic Pathology, Penn State Milton S. Hersey Medical Center, Hershey, PA (RZ); Breast and Gynecologic Cancer Research Group, Division of Cancer Prevention, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD (MES)
| | - David Mutch
- : Hormonal and Reproductive Epidemiology Branch, Division of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics (ASF, LAB) and Cancer Prevention Fellowship Program, Division of Cancer Prevention (ASF), National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD; Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Oklahoma, Oklahoma City, OK (SM, JLW); Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC (WTC); Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO (DM); Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Ohio State University College of Medicine, Columbus, OH (DEC); Women and Infants Hospital/Brown University, Providence, RI (RGM); University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN (LSD); Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY (RAS); Anatomic Pathology, Penn State Milton S. Hersey Medical Center, Hershey, PA (RZ); Breast and Gynecologic Cancer Research Group, Division of Cancer Prevention, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD (MES)
| | - David E Cohn
- : Hormonal and Reproductive Epidemiology Branch, Division of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics (ASF, LAB) and Cancer Prevention Fellowship Program, Division of Cancer Prevention (ASF), National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD; Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Oklahoma, Oklahoma City, OK (SM, JLW); Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC (WTC); Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO (DM); Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Ohio State University College of Medicine, Columbus, OH (DEC); Women and Infants Hospital/Brown University, Providence, RI (RGM); University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN (LSD); Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY (RAS); Anatomic Pathology, Penn State Milton S. Hersey Medical Center, Hershey, PA (RZ); Breast and Gynecologic Cancer Research Group, Division of Cancer Prevention, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD (MES)
| | - Joan L Walker
- : Hormonal and Reproductive Epidemiology Branch, Division of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics (ASF, LAB) and Cancer Prevention Fellowship Program, Division of Cancer Prevention (ASF), National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD; Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Oklahoma, Oklahoma City, OK (SM, JLW); Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC (WTC); Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO (DM); Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Ohio State University College of Medicine, Columbus, OH (DEC); Women and Infants Hospital/Brown University, Providence, RI (RGM); University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN (LSD); Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY (RAS); Anatomic Pathology, Penn State Milton S. Hersey Medical Center, Hershey, PA (RZ); Breast and Gynecologic Cancer Research Group, Division of Cancer Prevention, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD (MES)
| | - Richard G Moore
- : Hormonal and Reproductive Epidemiology Branch, Division of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics (ASF, LAB) and Cancer Prevention Fellowship Program, Division of Cancer Prevention (ASF), National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD; Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Oklahoma, Oklahoma City, OK (SM, JLW); Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC (WTC); Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO (DM); Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Ohio State University College of Medicine, Columbus, OH (DEC); Women and Infants Hospital/Brown University, Providence, RI (RGM); University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN (LSD); Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY (RAS); Anatomic Pathology, Penn State Milton S. Hersey Medical Center, Hershey, PA (RZ); Breast and Gynecologic Cancer Research Group, Division of Cancer Prevention, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD (MES)
| | - Levi S Downs
- : Hormonal and Reproductive Epidemiology Branch, Division of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics (ASF, LAB) and Cancer Prevention Fellowship Program, Division of Cancer Prevention (ASF), National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD; Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Oklahoma, Oklahoma City, OK (SM, JLW); Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC (WTC); Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO (DM); Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Ohio State University College of Medicine, Columbus, OH (DEC); Women and Infants Hospital/Brown University, Providence, RI (RGM); University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN (LSD); Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY (RAS); Anatomic Pathology, Penn State Milton S. Hersey Medical Center, Hershey, PA (RZ); Breast and Gynecologic Cancer Research Group, Division of Cancer Prevention, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD (MES)
| | - Robert A Soslow
- : Hormonal and Reproductive Epidemiology Branch, Division of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics (ASF, LAB) and Cancer Prevention Fellowship Program, Division of Cancer Prevention (ASF), National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD; Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Oklahoma, Oklahoma City, OK (SM, JLW); Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC (WTC); Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO (DM); Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Ohio State University College of Medicine, Columbus, OH (DEC); Women and Infants Hospital/Brown University, Providence, RI (RGM); University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN (LSD); Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY (RAS); Anatomic Pathology, Penn State Milton S. Hersey Medical Center, Hershey, PA (RZ); Breast and Gynecologic Cancer Research Group, Division of Cancer Prevention, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD (MES)
| | - Richard Zaino
- : Hormonal and Reproductive Epidemiology Branch, Division of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics (ASF, LAB) and Cancer Prevention Fellowship Program, Division of Cancer Prevention (ASF), National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD; Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Oklahoma, Oklahoma City, OK (SM, JLW); Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC (WTC); Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO (DM); Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Ohio State University College of Medicine, Columbus, OH (DEC); Women and Infants Hospital/Brown University, Providence, RI (RGM); University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN (LSD); Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY (RAS); Anatomic Pathology, Penn State Milton S. Hersey Medical Center, Hershey, PA (RZ); Breast and Gynecologic Cancer Research Group, Division of Cancer Prevention, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD (MES)
| | - Mark E Sherman
- : Hormonal and Reproductive Epidemiology Branch, Division of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics (ASF, LAB) and Cancer Prevention Fellowship Program, Division of Cancer Prevention (ASF), National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD; Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Oklahoma, Oklahoma City, OK (SM, JLW); Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC (WTC); Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO (DM); Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Ohio State University College of Medicine, Columbus, OH (DEC); Women and Infants Hospital/Brown University, Providence, RI (RGM); University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN (LSD); Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY (RAS); Anatomic Pathology, Penn State Milton S. Hersey Medical Center, Hershey, PA (RZ); Breast and Gynecologic Cancer Research Group, Division of Cancer Prevention, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD (MES)
| |
Collapse
|