Topographical distribution of allelic loss in individual lung adenocarcinomas with lymph node metastases

Pathologists' staging of multiple foci of lung cancer: poor concordance in absence of dramatic histologic or molecular differences

OBJECTIVES

A long-standing problem in lung cancer pathology has been to determine whether two anatomically distinct foci of lung carcinoma are independent primaries or intrapulmonary metastases. While several proposals exist with respect to this problem, it is not known how pathologists use these proposals in actual practice.

METHODS

We performed a voluntary survey of the Pulmonary Pathology Society, a self-selected group of pathologists with a specialty interest in pulmonary pathology, to determine their opinion on staging various specific scenarios of multiple foci of lung cancer.

RESULTS

We found that there was a great deal of disagreement and uncertainty in the approach to these scenarios unless there were also unambiguous molecular markers or a dramatic difference in histology.

CONCLUSIONS

Pathologists have a high degree of uncertainty and disagreement on staging multiple lung carcinomas. An improved pathologic method is required to distinguish separate primary tumors from intrapulmonary metastases. Until that is available, improved nomenclature is needed to convey the intrinsic uncertainty of the situation.

Approach to the ground-glass nodule

The detection of ground-glass opacity (GGO) is increasingly common. Sufficient data have been accumulated to formulate recommendations for observation, intervention, and treatment modalities. However, an understanding of many nuances and uncertainties in the available data is needed to avoid making management errors. This article discusses the range of possible entities, risk factors and characteristics that help make a presumptive clinical diagnosis, how often and for how long these should be followed when and how a biopsy should be done, how these lesions should be treated, and how multifocal GGOs should be approached.

Comparative Mutational Analysis of Pulmonary Scar Epithelium, Bronchioloalveolar Carcinomas, and Invasive Well-Differentiated Pulmonary Adenocarcinomas

Discrimination of invasive well-differentiated adenocarcinoma (IAD) from reactive bronchioloalveolar epithelium entrapped in pulmonary scars (PSE) may be difficult on routine histology, especially on small biopsies. Ancillary studies to help in this regard are desirable. Whereas IADs have been shown to harbor cumulative mutational damage of tumor suppressor genes, little is known about molecular changes in PSEs. In this study, we compared cumulative loss of heterozygosity (LOH) of tumor suppressor genes in PSEs (N = 12), bronchioloalveolar carcinomas (BACs, N = 15) and stage 1 IADs (N = 7). Unstained serial sections were microdissected to obtain lesional and normal tissue DNA. PCR was performed for up to 16 polymorphic markers. An allelic ratio of < 0.5 or >2.0 was designated as LOH. Fractional allelic loss (FAL) was calculated for each case as the number of markers with LOH divided by the total number of informative markers. Mean percentage of informative markers was 76.8%. PSEs showed significantly lower mean FAL compared with BACs and IADs (3.0% vs. 20.4% and 28.5%, respectively; P < 0.003). Only 1 case of PSE showed LOH of one marker in two different areas, whereas the majority of allelic losses in the neoplasms were present in two or more microdissected foci. Our study shows that PSEs harbor LOH of tumor suppressor genes at relatively low rates and in a random distribution compared with BACs and IADs, which show consistent allelic losses, and high FALs. These molecular differences may serve as an adjunct to histology in challenging glandular lesions of the lung.