Solid pseudopapillary neoplasms of the pancreas are associated with FLI-1 expression, but not with EWS/FLI-1 translocation

Twenty-one years of experience with resected solid pseudopapillary neoplasm: a retrospective single-institutional cohort study

BACKGROUND

Although the incidence of solid pseudopapillary neoplasm (SPN) is <2% of the incidence of pancreatic tumor, the prevalence seems to be increasing. SPNs are mostly benign. However, they also show malignant features. This study aimed to identify the clinical outcomes of patients who underwent surgery for SPN at a single center.

METHODS

Data on 217 patients with SPN who underwent surgery in Samsung Medical Center between 2000 and 2020 were retrospectively analyzed.

RESULTS

Herein, the mean age of the 217 patients was 40.0 ± 12.6 years, with a female predominance (80.6%). Most patients had no comorbidity. The mean tumor size was 4.4 ± 3.1 cm. The tumor was located at the pancreatic head in 36 patients (16.6%), the body of the pancreas in 69 patients (31.8%), and the pancreatic tail in 96 patients (44.2%). Of note, 35 patients (16.1%) underwent pancreaticoduodenectomies, 148 patients (68.2%) had distal pancreatectomies, and the other patients had subtotal /total pancreatectomy (9.7%) or enucleation/mass excision (6.0%). No patient had lymph node (LN) metastasis. Moreover, 6 patients (2.8%) had a recurrence in the liver or regional LNs. The 5-year recurrence-free survival rate was 96.8%. The only factor affecting recurrence was tumor size (P = .007).

CONCLUSION

Because SPN predominates in relatively young women, patients often hesitate to undergo surgery. Nevertheless, as size is the prognostic factor, early resection is recommended for a better prognosis in the case of surgically feasible, young age, and healthy patients.

Clinicopathological factors associated with recurrence in patients undergoing resection of pancreatic solid pseudopapillary neoplasm

PURPOSE

Solid pseudopapillary neoplasm (SPN) is an uncommon pathology with a low-grade malignancy. Surgery is the milestone treatment. Nevertheless, despite appropriate management, some patients present recurrence. Risk factors associated with recurrence are unclear. The objective was to identify the clinicopathological factors associated with recurrence in patients with SPN treated with pancreatic resection.

METHODS

Medical records of patients treated with pancreatic resection during 2006-2020 were evaluated. Patients with histological diagnosis of SPN were included. Survival analysis was performed to identify the clinicopathological factors related to recurrence.

RESULTS

Seventy-four patients were diagnosed with SPN; 70 (94.6%) patients were female, and the median age was 20 years old. The median tumor diameter was 7.9 cm. Multivisceral resection was performed in 9 (12.2%) patients. Four (5.4%) patients presented lymph node metastasis.R0 resection was achieved in all cases. Six (8%) patients presented recurrence and the liver was the most frequent recurrence site (n = 5).After a median follow-up of 40.2 months, 9 (12%) patients died. Five (6.8%) patients died of disease progression. The 1-3- and 5-year overall survival (OS) was 97.1%, 90.2% and 79.9%, respectively. The 1-3-and-5-year recurrence-free survival (RFS) was 98.4%, 89.9% and 87%, respectively. In the univariate Cox-regression analysis, age ≥ 28 years(HR = 8.61, 95% CI 1.1-73.8),tumor diameter ≥ 10 cm(HR = 9.3, 95% CI 1.12-79.6),invasion of adjacent organs (HR = 7.45, 95% CI 1.5-36.9), lymph node metastasis (pN +) (HR = 16.8, 95% CI 2.96-94.9) and, AJCC Stage III (HR = 10.1, 95% CI 1.2-90.9) were identified as predictors for recurrence.

CONCLUSIONS

SPN is more frequently diagnosed in young women with a good overall prognosis after an R0 surgical resection even with disease recurrence. Age ≥ 28 years, larger tumors ≥ 10 cm, invasion of adjacent organs, lymph node metastasis(pN +) and, AJCC Stage III were predictors factors of recurrence in resected SPN.

Clinical update on the management of pseudopapillary tumor of pancreas

Solid pseudopapillary neoplasm (SPN) is a rare tumor with malignant potential which is generally located in the tail of pancreas. The prevalence of SPN has increased with widespread use of cross sectional imaging. SPN is often misdiagnosed due to nonspecific clinical presentation and accurate diagnosis is essential for optimal management. Endoscopic ultrasound-FNA with immunohistochemistry can help in preoperative diagnosis. Surgery is the treatment of choice and a successful R0 resection is curative. Overall, SPN has a good prognosis. This review article focuses on pathogenesis, diagnosis and management of SPN.

LEF1, TFE3, and AR are putative diagnostic markers of solid pseudopapillary neoplasms

The diagnosis of solid pseudopapillary neoplasms (SPNs) is challenging because some SPNs share many similar morphological and immunohistochemical features with other pancreatic neoplasms. In this study, we investigated potential diagnostic markers of SPN.

Based on the SPN-specific upregulated genes from a previous DNA microarray and proteome study, we selected six immunohistochemical markers [beta-catenin, androgen receptor (AR), lymphoid enhancer-binding factor 1 (LEF1), transcription factor for immunoglobulin heavy-chain enhancer 3 (TFE3), fused in sarcoma (FUS), and WNT inhibitory factor 1 (WIF-1)]. We also evaluated the Ki-67 proliferative index to investigate its associations with prognosis. To validate these markers, we studied 91 SPNs as well as 51 pancreatic ductal carcinomas (PDC) and 48 neuroendocrine tumors (NET) as controls.

We found frequent and diffuse nuclear expressions of β-catenin (98.9%), AR (81.3%), LEF1 (93.4%), TFE3 (74.7%), FUS (84.6%), and cytoplasmic expression of WIF-1 (96.7%) in SPNs. In contrast, PDCs and NETs showed no expression. (P < 0.001). When beta-catenin, LEF1, and TFE3 staining were combined, the sensitivity and specificity were 100% and 91.9%, respectively. Four (4.4%) SPNs showed distant metastasis and these tumors were associated with a relatively high Ki-67 proliferative index (≥ 5%; P = 0.013).

We identified LEF1, TFE3, and AR as putative diagnostic markers of SPN, auxiliary to β-catenin. Incorporated into an immunohistochemical panel, these markers could be beneficial to distinguish SPN from PDC and NET. In addition, we suggest that the Ki-67 proliferative index can be a predictive marker of metastasis in SPNs.

BCL9L expression in pancreatic neoplasia with a focus on SPN: a possible explanation for the enigma of the benign neoplasia

BACKGROUND

Solid pseudopapillary neoplasms of the pancreas (SPN) are rare tumors affecting mainly women. They show an activating mutation in CTNNB1, the gene for β-catenin, and consequently an overactivation of the Wnt/β-catenin pathway. This signaling pathway is implied in the pathogenesis of various aggressive tumors, including pancreatic adenocarcinomas (PDAC). Despite this, SPN are characterized by an unusually benign clinical course. Attempts to explain this lack of malignancy have led to the discovery of an aberrant expression of the transcription factor FLI1 in SPN.

METHODS

In 42 primary pancreatic tumors the RNA-expression of the FLI1 targets DKK1, INPP5D, IGFBP3 and additionally two members of the Wnt/β-catenin pathway, namely BCL9 and BCL9L, was investigated using quantitative real time PCR. Expression of these genes was evaluated in SPN (n = 18), PDAC (n = 12) and the less aggressive intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasm IPMN (n = 12) and compared to normal pancreatic tissue. Potential differences between the tumor entities were evaluated using students t-test.

RESULTS

The results demonstrated a differential RNA-expression of BCL9L with a lack of expression in SPN (p < 0.001), RNA levels similar to normal tissue in IPMN and increased expression in PDAC (p < 0.04). Further, overexpression of the cyclin D1 inhibitor INPP5D in IPMN (p < 0.0001) was found. PDAC, on the other hand, showed the highest expression of IGFBP3 (p < 0.00001) with the gene still being significantly overexpressed in IPMN (p < 0.001). Nevertheless the difference in expression was significant between PDAC and IPMN (p < 0.05) and IGFBP3 RNA levels were significantly higher in PDAC and IPMN than in SPN (p < 0.0001 and p < 0.02, resp.).

CONCLUSIONS

This study demonstrates a significantly decreased expression of the β-catenin stabilizing gene BCL9L in SPN as a first clue to the possible reasons for the astonishingly benign behavior of this entity. In contrast, high expression of the gene was detected in PDAC supporting the connection between BCL9L expression and tumor malignancy in pancreas neoplasias. IPMN, accordingly, showed intermediate expression of BCL9L, but instead demonstrated a high expression of the cyclin D1 inhibitor INPP5D, possibly contributing to the better prognosis of this neoplasia compared to PDAC.

Pancreatic analogue solid pseudopapillary neoplasm arising in the paratesticular location. The first case report

We describe the first pancreatic analogue of solid pseudopapillary neoplasm arising in paratesticular location. It was a tumor arising in 32-year-old man adhering closely to the testis. The tumor had several morphologic components. The greatest was represented by signet ring cells which gradually changed into solid, non-signet ring cell areas, often being mixed together. It also formed distinct trabeculae and pseudopapillae frequently adhering to cystic areas of the tumor. Immunohistochemically, the tumor had an identical profile to its pancreatic counterpart. The tumor cells reacted diffusely with S100 protein, β-catenin, cyclin D1, Fli-1, vimentin, CD10, galectin-3, and neuron-specific enolase and focally with synaptophysin. CD56 and E-cadherin reacted only in those parts of the tumor, which formed pseudopapillae. Cytokeratin antibody AE1-AE3 was strongly positive in the areas of trabecular formation of the tumor. The mutational analysis of exon 3 of the CTNNB1 gene confirmed mutation in this exon.

Diagnosis and molecular aspects of solid-pseudopapillary neoplasms of the pancreas

Solid-pseudopapillary neoplasm of the pancreas (SPN) is an uncommon low-grade malignant neoplasm occurring mostly in young women. In addition to its distinctive pathological appearance of pseudopapillae with poorly cohesive neoplastic cells, rare variants exist raising the differential diagnosis especially with neuroendocrine neoplasms. The overall prognosis for patients with SPNs is excellent after surgical resection. Nevertheless, 10% of cases may have malignant behavior characterized by tumor recurrence and/or metastasis. Despite numerous studies, the histogenesis of this neoplasm remains unclear. Distinctive molecular alterations such as the presence of CTNNB1 mutations are observed in nearly all cases, while mutations classically observed in ductal adenocarcinoma, such as KRAS, TP53, and SMAD4, are not observed in SPNs, reinforcing its distinct nature compared to all other pancreatic neoplasms. Recent transcriptional studies have shown that activation of the Wnt/beta-catenin pathway in these tumors is associated with the upregulation of genes belonging to Notch, Hedgehog, and androgen receptor signaling pathways.

Cercariform cells: another cytologic feature distinguishing solid pseudopapillary neoplasms from pancreatic endocrine neoplasms and acinar cell carcinomas in endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspirates

BACKGROUND

Solid pseudopapillary neoplasm (SPPN) is a rare tumor of unknown origin that occurs predominantly in the body or tail of the pancreas in young women. The authors recently identified cercariform (Greek: tailed) cells, similar to those described in urothelial carcinomas, as a consistent cytologic feature in ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration (EUS-FNA) samples from SPPNs. The objective of the current multi-institutional study was to define the value of these cells in the differential diagnosis of SPPN with other neoplasms characterized cytologically by the presence of monotonous, uniform cells in pancreatic aspirates: pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (Pan-NETs) and acinar cell carcinomas (ACCs).

METHODS

The files of 4 academic hospitals were searched for SPPNs, Pan-NETs, and ACCs that were diagnosed by EUS-FNA. The slides were reviewed, and several cytologic features were recorded semiquantitatively to identify discriminating features between SPPNs, Pan-NETs, and ACCs.

RESULTS

From the analysis of 18 SPPNs, 4 ACCs, and 20 Pan-NETs, the following cytologic features were identified as common to all 3 neoplasms: single cells and rosettes/acinar cell groups, round-to-plasmacytoid cells, pale-to-granular cytoplasm, fine vacuoles, and binucleated cells. Papillary structures, cercariform cells, large cytoplasmic vacuoles, reniform nuclei, hyaline globules/magenta-colored material, and degenerative features (cholesterol crystals, calcifications, foam cells, or giant cells) were significantly more common in SPPNs. Prominent nuclear grooves were encountered in only 4 of 18 SPPNs.

CONCLUSIONS

The current results indicated that the presence of cercariform cells is another useful clue for the cytologic diagnosis of SPPN in challenging cases.

Solid pseudopapillary neoplasm of the pancreas

Solid pseudopapillary neoplasms (SPNs) are rare entities accounting for between 0.13 and 2.7 per cent of pancreatic tumours. This neoplasm has a predilection for females under the age of 35. The authors report this case of a SPN incidentally discovered when a 59-year-old female underwent a chest x-ray to investigate a wheeze. A subsequent CT abdomen revealed a 10 cm well-circumscribed mass adjacent to the tail of the pancreas. This mass was successfully resected. Immunohistochemical markers established the diagnosis of a SPN. The wheeze associated with the presentation of this case was unrelated to the tumour which was an incidental finding. These neoplasms are largely asymptomatic and indolent reaching a large size before detection. Diagnosis is confirmed on histology and in this case surgical resection was curative and there was no metastasis at presentation.

Immunohistochemical features of the gastrointestinal tract tumors

Gastrointestinal tract tumors include a wide variety of vastly different tumors and on a whole are one of the most common malignancies in western countries. These tumors often present at late stages as distant metastases which are then biopsied and may be difficult to differentiate without the aid of immunohistochemical stains. With the exception of pancreatic and biliary tumors where there are no distinct immunohistochemical patterns, most gastrointestinal tumors can be differentiated by their unique immunohistochemical profile. As the size of biopsies decrease, the role of immunohistochemical stains will become even more important in determining the origin and differentiation of gastrointestinal tract tumors.

Exocrine Pancreatic Neoplasms of Nonductal Origin: Acinar Cell Carcinoma, Pancreatoblastoma, and Solid-Pseudopapillary Neoplasm

This review describes the clinicopathologic characteristics, differential diagnosis, and biologic behavior of exocrine pancreatic tumors of predominantly nonductal differentiation: acinar cell carcinoma, pancreatoblastoma, and solid-pseudopapillary neoplasm. Patients usually present with a well-demarcated, large, soft, solitary mass with expansile, rather than infiltrative, growth pattern. Cystic change is common. Histologically, the tumors usually reveal at least a focal solid, cellular appearance composed of uniform, monomorphic epithelial cells. However, each type has characteristic clinicopathological features. The immunohistochemical labeling profile of pancreatoblastoma parallels the multiple lines of differentiation. These tumors are capable of producing metastases; however, their behavior is different among the types and even in the same type. Therefore, establishment of a grading system that can predict the outcome would be helpful.

Pancreatic cysts: pathologic classification, differential diagnosis, and clinical implications

CONTEXT

Cystic lesions of the pancreas are being recognized with increasing frequency and have become a more common finding in clinical practice because of the widespread use of advanced imaging modalities and the sharp drop in the mortality rate of pancreatic surgery. Consequently, in the past 2 decades, the nature of many cystic tumors in this organ has been better characterized, and significant developments have taken place in the classification and in our understanding of pancreatic cystic lesions.

OBJECTIVE

To provide an overview of the current concepts in classification, differential diagnosis, and clinical/biologic behavior of pancreatic cystic tumors.

DATA SOURCES

The authors' personal experience, based on institutional and consultation materials, combined with an analysis of the literature.

CONCLUSIONS

In contrast to solid tumors, most of which are invasive ductal adenocarcinomas with dismal prognosis, cystic lesions of the pancreas are often either benign or low-grade indolent neoplasia. However, those that are mucinous, namely, intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasms and mucinous cystic neoplasms, constitute an important category because they have well-established malignant potential, representing an adenoma-carcinoma sequence. Those that are nonmucinous such as serous tumors, congenital cysts, lymphoepithelial cysts, and squamoid cyst of pancreatic ducts have no malignant potential. Only rare nonmucinous cystic tumors that occur as a result of degenerative/necrotic changes in otherwise solid neoplasia, such as cystic ductal adenocarcinomas, cystic pancreatic endocrine neoplasia, and solid-pseudopapillary neoplasm, are also malignant and have variable degrees of aggressiveness.

Array comparative genomic hybridization analysis of solid pseudopapillary neoplasms of the pancreas

Solid pseudopapillary neoplasms of the pancreas are low-grade malignancies, but their biological behavior cannot be stratified solely on the basis of histopathologic criteria. Aside from mutations in beta-catenin and lack of genetic changes common to pancreatic ductal adenocarcinomas, little is known about the chromosomal alterations in solid pseudopapillary neoplasms. We applied array comparative genomic hybridization to a series of 12 patients. The average age was 31 years (range 12-52 years) with 10 female and 2 male patients. The average tumor size was 7.3 cm (range 2-24 cm) with five lesions greater than 5 cm. All cases had 'bland' cytology without significant pleomorphism or high nuclear grade, but seven cases demonstrated at least one of these potentially aggressive histopathologic features: size >5 cm, tumor necrosis, lymphovascular invasion, perineural invasion and peripancreatic invasion. Clinically, one lesion demonstrated aggressive behavior. By array comparative genomic hybridization, chromosomal losses and/or gains were identified in eight cases; five cases had multiple (five or more) alterations. The most common alterations were gains at 13q, 17q, 1q and 8q. Six of the seven cases with at least one aggressive feature had genetic alterations, while only two cases without adverse features had genetic alterations (P=0.024). The single clinically aggressive tumor exhibited seven chromosomal gains and four aggressive histopathologic features. Our study demonstrates that genetic alterations detected by array comparative genomic hybridization are common in solid pseudopapillary neoplasms of the pancreas. Additional study and longer follow-up are needed to determine if these genetic abnormalities could help predict clinical behavior in these neoplasms.

Cystic neoplasms of the exocrine pancreas

The increasing use of radiological imaging has led to greater detection of small and asymptomatic cystic lesions of the pancreas. Most are resectable, but not all are neoplastic. This review provides an update on the histopathology, immunohistochemistry, molecular biology, pathogenesis and management of cystic neoplasms of the exocrine pancreas. These include the serous, the mucinous cystic, the intraductal papillary mucinous and the solid pseudopapillary neoplasms. Recently reported variants are described and very rare cystic variants of other pancreatic epithelial and mesenchymal neoplasms are briefly mentioned.

Solid pseudopapillary neoplasms of the pancreas show an interruption of the Wnt-signaling pathway and express gene products of 11q

Solid pseudopapillary neoplasms of the pancreas almost consistently show a beta-catenin mutation activating the Wnt-signaling pathway, resulting in overexpression of cyclin D1, but not in overt malignancy of this tumor. Besides cyclin D1, a set of markers (ie FLI-1, CD56 and progesterone receptor), whose genes map to chromosome 11q, are frequently expressed in solid pseudopapillary neoplasms. Chromosome 11q is a region that is also often affected in pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors. This immunohistochemical study was undertaken to gain insights into the downstream regulation of the Wnt-signaling pathway and the significance of overexpressed gene products belonging to chromosome 11q for the tumorigenesis in solid pseudopapillary neoplasms. Fourteen solid pseudopapillary neoplasms were analyzed for the expression of cyclin-dependent kinase inhibitors p21, p27, p16 and hyperphosphorylated retinoblastoma (pRb) proteins. In an extended series of 93 solid pseudopapillary neoplasms, beta-catenin, cyclin D1, FLI-1 and CD56 expression was examined and compared with that in 22 pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors. Solid pseudopapillary neoplasms (98%) showed aberrant expression of beta-catenin with a concomitant cyclin D1 expression in 69% of the cases, but no expression of pRb (0%) was found. p27 and p21 were expressed in 100% (14/14) and 86% (12/14) of the cases, but only 2/14 (14%) were positive for p16. FLI-1 was expressed in 63% of solid pseudopapillary neoplasms, but only in 1/22 pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (5%), cyclin D1 expression was present in 14% of the latter. We conclude that in solid pseudopapillary neoplasms the activated Wnt-signaling pathway is disrupted, and that p21 and p27 are contributing to this fact by blocking of the hyperphosphorylation of the Rb protein, thus causing the very low proliferation rate characterizing the solid pseudopapillary neoplasms. The accumulation of high expression of proteins whose genes are located on chromosome 11q is characteristic of solid pseudopapillary neoplasms, but not of pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors.

Loss of cell-adhesion molecule complexes in solid pseudopapillary tumor of pancreas

Solid pseudopapillary tumor of pancreas (SPT) is a rare neoplasm that occurs most often in young females with the two distinct features, the 'solid-cystic' gross appearance, and the 'solid-pseudopapillary' microscopic pattern. It has been reported that almost all SPT tumors contain a mutation in the beta-catenin gene; however, the histogenetic origin of this tumor remains largely a mystery. E-cadherin is a cell adhesion molecule that links to catenins to form cell adhesion junctions, which is associated with the cytoskeleton formation. In this study, we examined the expression of E-cadherin and beta-catenin from SPT in an attempt to determine the molecular basis for the unusual morphology of this tumor. Nine cases of SPT were retrieved from Surgical Pathologic Archives of three institutions, including one male and eight females. H&E slides of each case were reviewed to confirm the diagnosis. The beta-catenin gene was sequenced in one case. E-cadherin and beta-catenin immunostains, were performed on all nine cases. Sequencing analysis on one case showed a point mutation of the beta-catenin gene, confirming previous findings that almost all SPT tumors contain mutation in the beta-catenin gene. Immunostains showed that, in both solid and pseudopapillary areas, all the tumor cells lost expression of E-cadherin, and beta-catenin nuclear expression was observed in all cases. Our findings suggest that loss of cytoplasmic beta-catenin protein in the cell adhesion complex due to beta-catenin gene mutation, results in instability of the complex, loss of E-cadherin in cell membrane, and eventually dissociation of the tumor cells to form the pseudopapillary pattern.