Zhang AJ, Xu L, Li WL, Ma SY, Niu ZY, Wang Q. Significance of DNA ploidy analysis and carcinoembryonic antigen assay for differential diagnosis between benign and malignant ascites.
Shijie Huaren Xiaohua Zazhi 2009;
17:724-728. [DOI:
10.11569/wcjd.v17.i7.724]
[Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
AIM: To investigate the differential diagnostic significance of DNA ploidy analysis and serum, ascetic carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA), ascites/serum CEA ratios assay in malignant (PHC and non-PHC malignancy) and benign ascites.
METHODS: Flow cytometry (FCM) was used for DNA ploidy analysis and enzyme linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) for CEA assay in 56 malignant (31 PHC and 25 non-PHC) ascites. As a control, 50 nonmalignant ascites were evaluated at the same time. If the serum or ascitic CEA value >5 μg/L, and the ascites/serum CEA ratios >1, then the CEA assay was defined as positive. If an aneuploidy was detected, the result of the DNA ploidy analysis was defined as positive.
RESULTS: The sensitivity and specificity of ascitic CEA, ascites/serum CEA ratios>1 and aneuploidy in differential diagnosis of PHC ascites and non-PHC with malignant ascites or with benign ascites were 35.48%, 84% and 72%, 84%; 35.48%, 98% and 72%, 98%; 70.97%, 86% and 71.43%, 86%, respectively. The sensitivity and specificity of the combination assay of aneuploidy and ascites/serum CEA ratios >1 in differential diagnosis of PHC ascites and non-PHC with malignant ascites or with benign ascites were 93.55%, 100%; 92%, 100%, respectively.
CONCLUSION: Our study confirmed the differential diagnostic value between benign and malignant ascites of the combination assay of ascites/serum CEA ratios assay and the DNA ploidy analysis.
Collapse