Prognostic relevance of hMLH1, hMSH2, and BAX protein expression in endometrial carcinoma

The Role of Immunohistochemistry Markers in Endometrial Cancer with Mismatch Repair Deficiency: A Systematic Review

The objective of this systematic review was to summarize our current knowledge of the role of immunohistochemistry (IHC) markers for identifying mismatch repair-deficient (MMRd) tumors in endometrial cancer (EC). Identification of MMRd tumors, which occur in 13% to 30% of all ECs, has become critical for patients with colorectal and endometrial cancer for therapeutic management, clinical decision making, and prognosis. This review was conducted by two authors applying the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines using the following terms: “immunohistochemistry and microsatellite instability endometrial cancer” or “immunohistochemistry and mismatch repair endometrial cancer” or “immunohistochemistry and mismatch repair deficient endometrial cancer”. Among 596 retrieved studies, 161 fulfilled the inclusion criteria. Articles were classified and presented according to their interest for the diagnosis, prognosis, and theragnostics for patients with MMRd EC. We identified 10, 18, and 96 articles using IHC expression of two, three, or four proteins of the MMR system (MLH1, MSH2, MHS6, and PMS2), respectively. MLH1 promoter methylation was analyzed in 57 articles. Thirty-four articles classified MMRd tumors with IHC markers according to their prognosis in terms of recurrence-free survival (RFS), overall survival (OS), stage, grade, and lymph node invasion. Theragnostics were studied in eight articles underlying the important concentration of PD-L1 in MMRd EC. Even though the role of IHC has been challenged, it represents the most common, robust, and cheapest method for diagnosing MMRd tumors in EC and is a valuable tool for exploring novel biotherapies and treatment modalities.

PIpelle Prospective ENDOmetrial carcinoma (PIPENDO) study, pre-operative recognition of high risk endometrial carcinoma: a multicentre prospective cohort study

BACKGROUND

Endometrial carcinoma is the most common gynaecologic malignancy in industrialised countries and the incidence is still rising. Primary treatment is based on preoperative risk classification and consists in most cases of hysterectomy with bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy. In patients with serous and clear cell histology a complete surgical staging is mandatory. However, in routine clinical practice final histology regularly does not correspond with the preoperative histological diagnosis. This results in both over and under treatment.

METHODS/DESIGN

The aim of this multicentre, prospective cohort study is to select a panel of prognostic biomarkers to improve preoperative diagnosis of endometrial carcinoma in order to identify those patients that need extended surgery and/or additional treatment. Additionally, we will determine whether incorporation of cervical cytology and comorbidity could improve this preoperative risk classification. All patients treated for endometrial carcinoma in the participating hospitals from September 2011 till December 2013 are included. Patient characteristics, as well as comorbidity are registered. Patients without preoperative histology, history of hysterectomy and/or endometrial carcinoma or no surgical treatment including hysterectomy are excluded. The preoperative histology and final pathology will be reviewed and compared by expert pathologists. Additional immunohistochemical analysis of IMP3, p53, ER, PR, MLH1, PTEN, beta-catenin, p16, Ki-67, stathmin, ARID1A and L1CAM will be performed. Preoperative histology will be compared with the final pathology results. Follow-up will be at least 24 months to determine risk factors for recurrence and outcome.

DISCUSSION

This study is designed to improve surgical treatment of endometrial carcinoma patients. A total of 432 endometrial carcinoma patients were enrolled between 2011 and 2013. Follow-up will be completed in 2015. Preoperative histology will be evaluated systematically and background endometrium will be classified. This is the first study incorporating immunohistochemistry, cervical cytology and comorbidity to define the optimal panel of prognostic biomarkers that contribute in clinical decision making in the management of endometrial carcinoma.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

Netherlands Trial Register number NTR3503.

Mismatch repair status and clinical outcome in endometrial cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

The association between the deficiency in mismatch repair (MMR) genes and prognosis in women with endometrial cancer is unclear. Here we report a systematic review and meta-analysis exploring this association.

METHODS

We searched literature databases (MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Cochrane) from 1980 until December 2011 to identify studies evaluating the association between MMR status and clinical outcome in endometrial cancer. The main outcome measures were overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS).

RESULTS

Twenty-three studies met the inclusion criteria. The median sample size of studies was 112, 74% were retrospective case-series and 70% performed microsatellite instability (MSI) analysis to evaluate the status of MMR. Only 22% of studies used the panel of five microsatellite markers recommended by the National Cancer Institute. Seven studies used immunohistochemistry to define MMR deficiency, but only two of them determined the expression of all four MMR proteins. Overall, significant associations between MMR and outcome were observed in 32% of studies. There was marked inter-study heterogeneity for estimates of OS and DFS. Pooled analysis did not show any significant association between deficiency in MMR and worse OS (6 studies, hazard ratio [HR] 2.0, p=0.11) or DFS (4 studies, HR ratio 1.31, p=0.66).

CONCLUSION

There is no definitive evidence of a significant association between MMR status and detrimental survival in endometrial cancer.

Significance of mismatch repair genes hMLH1 and hMSH2 expression in gastric cancer

AIM: To investigate the role of mismatch repair genes human mutL homolog 1 (hMLH1) and human mutL homolog 2 (hMSH2) in the carcinogenesis of gastric cancer.

METHODS: A total of 40 gastric cancer patients who underwent surgical resection at our hospital were included in the study, of which 33 were pathologically diagnosed as adenocarcinoma, and 7 as mucinous adenocarcinoma. All the patients did not underwent preoperative chemotherapy or immunotherapy. The gastric cancer specimens, matched cancer-adjacent tissue specimens, and 20 chronic gastritis mucosa specimens (10 diagnosed as chronic superficial gastritis by gastroscopic biopsy, and 10 as chronic atrophic gastritis) were collected. The expression of hMLH1 and hMSH2 proteins in these specimens was detected by Western blot.

RESULTS: The positive rate of hMSH2 expression in cancer tissue was significantly higher than those in cancer-adjacent tissue and gastritis mucosa tissue (0.28 ± 0.10 vs 0.23 ± 0.07 and 0.11 ± 0.10, respectively; both P < 0.01). The positive rate of hMLH1 expression in cancer tissue was significantly lower than those in cancer-adjacent tissue and gastritis mucosa tissue (0.22 ± 0.06 vs 0.28 ± 0.07, 0.26 ± 0.06, both P < 0.01). The positive rates of hMLH1 and hMSH2 expression were not correlated with various clinicopathological parameters in gastric cancer.

CONCLUSION: High hMSH2 expression and low hMLH1 expression may be potential markers for prediction of the development of gastric cancer.

Loss of hMLH1 expression is associated with less aggressive clinicopathological features in sporadic endometrioid endometrial adenocarcinoma

AIM

To assess the incidence and clinicopathological significance of microsatellite instability (MSI) and the protein expression of hMLH1 and hMSH2 in sporadic endometrioid endometrial adenocarcinoma (SEEA).

METHODS

A total of 50 patients with pure endometrioid sporadic endometrial adenocarcinoma were enrolled in the study. MSI analysis was done using five polymorphic markers (BAT26, D5S346, BAT25, D17S250, D2S123) and the protein expression of the hMLH1 and hMSH2 genes was determined by immunohistochemical staining. MSI was detected in 24% (12/50) of SEEA cases.

RESULTS

There was a significant correlation between MSI status and loss of hMLH1, hMSH2 expression, respectively. No significant association was found between MSI status and clinicopathological parameters, including age, grade, stage, depth of myometrial invasion, lymph-vascular space invasion (LVI), lymph node involvement or peritoneal cytology. However, significant correlations were found between loss of hMLH1 and a lower histological grade and the absence of LVI in patients with SEEA.

CONCLUSIONS

According to these results, MSI and a loss of protein expression of hMLH1 and hMSH2 may be associated with the pathogenesis of SEEA. In addition, hMLH1 immunostaining might have a role as a prognostic parameter. Further research using a large number of cases is needed to confirm our observations.

Defective mismatch repair and the development of recurrent endometrial carcinoma

OBJECTIVE

To investigate whether defective DNA mismatch repair (MMR) defines a subgroup at risk for recurrence in sporadic endometrial carcinoma patients.

METHODS

Primary tumors from 44 patients with recurrent stage I endometrial carcinoma were compared after matching, with tumors of 44 patients being free of recurrence for minimal 3 years. Paraffin-embedded primary tumors (n = 88) and recurrent tumors (n = 32) were subjected to immunohistochemical analysis for hMSH2 and hMLH1 expression. Subsequently, a staining index (SI = 0-9) was calculated based on staining intensity and quantity. DNA was extracted from paraffin-embedded tissues, and promoter methylation of hMLH1 was determined by nested methylation-specific PCR (MSP). Microsatellite instability (MSI) was assessed by BAT-26 or BAT-25.

RESULTS

Low hMSH2 expression was observed in 2% of primary tumors of control patients without recurrence, 14% of primary tumors of patients with recurrence, and 0% of recurrent tumors. Low hMLH1 expression was observed in 32%, 19%, and 22%, respectively. hMLH1 gene promoter methylation was detected in 50%, 47%, and 32%, and MSI was found in 16%, 14%, and 30%, respectively. No significant differences were found between primary tumors of patients with and without recurrence with respect to hMSH2 and hMLH1 expression, hMLH1 promoter methylation, and MSI. When primary and recurrent tumors were compared, there was an increased correlation of hMLH1 methylation with low hMLH1 expression and MSI in recurrent tumors.

CONCLUSION

MSI, hMLH1 promoter methylation, and the expression of hMLH1 and hMSH2 are not predictive for the development of recurrent stage I endometrial carcinoma. In the progression of tumor, "de novo" hMLH1 methylation rarely occurs, instead there is further derailment of the MMR pathway in affected tumors.

Microsatellite instability and expression of hMLH1 and hMSH2 proteins in ovarian endometrioid cancer

Microsatellite instability and loss of heterozygosity has been implicated in ovarian carcinogenesis. The reported frequency of microsatellite instability in human ovarian cancer varies significantly owing to the use of heterogeneous tumor histotypes and various microsatellite markers in different laboratories. In this study, we determined the frequency of microsatellite instability in 74 ovarian endometrioid carcinomas using four microsatellite markers (BAT25, BAT26, D5S346, D17S250), and examined hMLH1 and hMSH2 protein expression. In all, 20% of the tumors were microsatellite instability high (two or more markers showing instability) and 12% were microsatellite instability low (one marker showed instability). Loss of hMLH1 and/or hMSH2 expression was found in nine of 15 microsatellite instability-high tumors. The microsatellite instability-high phenotype tended to occur more frequently in low-grade tumors (P=0.053), but did not correlate with clinical stage. Totally, 38% of cases also displayed loss of heterozygosity at D17S250; this loss of heterozygosity was associated with high clinical stage (P=0.097). Our results indicate that both microsatellite and loss of heterozygosity at D17S250 are involved in the development of ovarian endometrioid carcinoma.

The significance of immunohistochemistry in the diagnosis and therapy of neoplasms

This review article details the diagnostical significance of immunohistochemistry, which has developed during the last quarter of the century. Certainly, the advancement of monoclonal antibody technology has been of great significance in assuring the place of immunohistochemistry in the modern accurate microscopic diagnosis of human neoplasms, as a method of choice in histopathology. The fact still remains that in order to properly assess any immunohistochemical reactivity used for differential diagnostic purposes, the target cells have to be identified as neoplastically transformed cells by routine histopathological techniques. Selected groups of target molecules of great significance in cancer biology are discussed. The discovery of neoplasm-associated antigens has not only made the more accurate diagnosis of human cancer feasible but has also shed light on the extensive immunophenotypical heterogeneity of even the most closely linked human malignancies. The identification of disseminated neoplastically transformed cells by immunohistochemistry has allowed for a clearer picture of cancer invasion and metastasis, as well as the evolution of the tumour cell associated immunophenotype towards increased malignancy. Some possibilities of neoplasm-associated antigen targeted, receptor-directed immunotherapy are discussed and reviewed in this manuscript. Future antineoplastic therapeutical approaches should see the inclusion of a variety of immunotherapies, in the form of an individualised 'cocktail' specific for the particular immunophenotypical pattern associated with each individual patient's neoplastic disease.

Microsatellite instability, loss of heterozygosity, and loss of hMLH1 and hMSH2 protein expression in endometrial carcinoma

Microsatellite instability (MSI) due to replication errors occurs frequently in hereditary tumors. Association with functional inactivation of the mismatch repair (MMR) genes and lack of protein expression has been described. In endometrial carcinoma (EC), the prevalence and clinical significance of these phenomena are not well known. Therefore, DNA samples from 89 EC and 5 metachronous tumors were analyzed with polymerase chain reaction, using 5 microsatellite markers and a DNA sequencer for amplicon detection. The results were correlated with immunohistochemistry of hMLH1 and hMSH2. MSI at >or=2 loci (MSI-H) was detected in 10/89 EC (11%); 1 of 10 showed loss of both hMLH1 and hMSH2, and 5 of 10 showed loss of hMLH1 (P < 0.0001). MSI-H was observed frequently in tumors with mucinous differentiation (P = 0.048), >10% of solid-cribriform pattern (P = 0.037), International Federation of Obstetrics and Gynecology (FIGO) stage III to IV (4 of 13; P = 0.016), and necrosis >5% (P = 0.07). Loss of heterozygosity (LOH) in >or=1 loci was found in 17 of 156 (11%). Survival (Kaplan-Meier) was longer for patients with endometrioid tumors with predominant glandular pattern, <5% necrosis, low FIGO stage and grade, superficial myometrial infiltration, no lymph-vascular invasion (LVI), and loss of hMLH1 expression (all P <or= 0.04). Cox analysis showed independent value for stage, grade, histologic type and pattern, LVI, and hMLH1 expression (all P < 0.05). Age, MSI status, LOH, peritumoral inflammatory reaction, hMSH2, and development of metachronous tumors did not influence survival. In conclusion, MSI phenotype was observed in a small subset of mainly advanced-stage EC, frequently showing mucinous differentiation, areas of solid-cribriform pattern, and necrosis. It is often associated with loss of hMLH1 expression, which may be a prognostic marker, but only rarely with defects of hMSH2.