Distinct molecular cues ensure a robust microtubule-dependent nuclear positioning in the Drosophila oocyte

The Importance of the Position of the Nucleus in Drosophila Oocyte Development

Oogenesis is a developmental process leading to the formation of an oocyte, a haploid gamete, which upon fertilisation and sperm entry allows the male and the female pronuclei to fuse and give rise to a zygote. In addition to forming a haploid gamete, oogenesis builds up a store of proteins, mRNAs, and organelles in the oocyte needed for the development of the future embryo. In several species, such as Drosophila, the polarity axes determinants of the future embryo must be asymmetrically distributed prior to fertilisation. In the Drosophila oocyte, the correct positioning of the nucleus is essential for establishing the dorsoventral polarity axis of the future embryo and allowing the meiotic spindles to be positioned in close vicinity to the unique sperm entry point into the oocyte.

Polarity and axis formation in the Drosophila female germ line

By the time a Drosophila egg is laid, both major body axes have already been defined and it contains all the nutrients needed to develop into a free-living larva in 24 h. By contrast, it takes almost a week to make an egg from a female germline stem cell, during the complex process of oogenesis. This review will discuss key symmetry-breaking steps in Drosophila oogenesis that lead to the polarisation of both body axes: the asymmetric divisions of the germline stem cells; the selection of the oocyte from the 16-cell germline cyst; the positioning of the oocyte at the posterior of the cyst; Gurken signalling from the oocyte to polarise the anterior-posterior axis of the somatic follicle cell epithelium around the developing germline cyst; the signalling back from the posterior follicle cells to polarise the anterior-posterior axis of the oocyte; and the migration of the oocyte nucleus that specifies the dorsal-ventral axis. Since each event creates the preconditions for the next, I will focus on the mechanisms that drive these symmetry-breaking steps, how they are linked and the outstanding questions that remain to be answered.

A Diaphanous and Enabled-dependent asymmetric actin cable array repositions nuclei during Drosophila oogenesis

Cells reposition their nuclei for diverse specialized functions through a wide variety of cytoskeletal mechanisms. During Drosophila oogenesis, 15 nurse cells connected by ring canals to each other and the oocyte contract, ‘dumping’ their cytoplasm into the oocyte. Prior to dumping, actin cables initiate from the nurse cell cortex and elongate toward their nuclei, pushing them away from ring canals to prevent obstruction. How the cable arrays reposition nuclei is unknown. We found that these arrays are asymmetric, with regional differences in actin cable growth rate dependent on the differential localization of the actin assembly factors Enabled and Diaphanous. Enabled mislocalization produces a uniform growth rate. In oocyte-contacting nurse cells with asymmetric cable arrays, nuclei move away from ring canals. With uniform arrays, these nuclei move toward the adjacent ring canal instead. This correlated with ring canal nuclear blockage and incomplete dumping. Our data suggest that nuclear repositioning relies on the regulated cortical localization of Diaphanous and Enabled to produce actin cable arrays with asymmetric growth that push nuclei away from ring canals, enabling successful oogenesis.

Microtubule disassembly by caspases is an important rate-limiting step of cell extrusion

The expulsion of dying epithelial cells requires well-orchestrated remodelling steps to maintain tissue sealing. This process, named cell extrusion, has been mostly analysed through the study of actomyosin regulation. Yet, the mechanistic relationship between caspase activation and cell extrusion is still poorly understood. Using the Drosophila pupal notum, a single layer epithelium where extrusions are caspase-dependent, we showed that the initiation of cell extrusion and apical constriction are surprisingly not associated with the modulation of actomyosin concentration and dynamics. Instead, cell apical constriction is initiated by the disassembly of a medio-apical mesh of microtubules which is driven by effector caspases. Importantly, the depletion of microtubules is sufficient to bypass the requirement of caspases for cell extrusion, while microtubule stabilisation strongly impairs cell extrusion. This study shows that microtubules disassembly by caspases is a key rate-limiting step of extrusion, and outlines a more general function of microtubules in epithelial cell shape stabilisation.

Using the Drosophila pupal notum, the authors demonstrate that the disassembly of microtubules by effector caspases initiate cell extrusion independently of actomyosin regulation, thus providing insights into how caspases orchestrate dying epithelial cell expulsion.

Polarity Events in the Drosophila melanogaster Oocyte

Cell polarity is a pre-requirement for many fundamental processes in animal cells, such as asymmetric cell division, axon specification, morphogenesis and epithelial tissue formation. For all these different processes, polarization is established by the same set of proteins, called partitioning defective (Par) proteins. During development in Drosophila melanogaster, decision making on the cellular and organism level is achieved with temporally controlled cell polarization events. The initial polarization of Par proteins occurs as early as in the germline cyst, when one of the 16 cells becomes the oocyte. Another marked event occurs when the anterior–posterior axis of the future organism is defined by Par redistribution in the oocyte, requiring external signaling from somatic cells. Here, we review the current literature on cell polarity events that constitute the oogenesis from the stem cell to the mature egg.

Nuclear positioning during development: Pushing, pulling and flowing

The positioning of the nucleus, the central organelle of the cell, is an active and regulated process crucially linked to cell cycle, differentiation, migration, and polarity. Alterations in positioning have been correlated with cell and tissue function deficiency and genetic or chemical manipulation of nuclear position is embryonic lethal. Nuclear positioning is a precursor for symmetric or asymmetric cell division which is accompanied by fate determination of the daughter cells. Nuclear positioning also plays a key role during early embryonic developmental stages in insects, such as Drosophila, where hundreds of nuclei divide without cytokinesis and are distributed within the large syncytial embryo at roughly regular spacing. While the cytoskeletal elements and the linker proteins to the nucleus are fairly well characterised, including some of the force generating elements driving nuclear movement, there is considerable uncertainty about the biophysical mechanism of nuclear positioning, while the field is debating different force models. In this review, we highlight the current body of knowledge, discuss cell context dependent models of nuclear positioning, and outline open questions.

GFP-Tagged Protein Detection by Electron Microscopy Using a GBP-APEX Tool in Drosophila

In cell biology, detection of protein subcellular localizations is often achieved by optical microscopy techniques and more rarely by electron microscopy (EM) despite the greater resolution offered by EM. One of the possible reasons was that protein detection by EM required specific antibodies whereas this need could be circumvented by using fluorescently-tagged proteins in optical microscopy approaches. Recently, the description of a genetically encodable EM tag, the engineered ascorbate peroxidase (APEX), whose activity can be monitored by electron-dense DAB precipitates, has widened the possibilities of specific protein detection in EM. However, this technique still requires the generation of new molecular constructions. Thus, we decided to develop a versatile method that would take advantage of the numerous GFP-tagged proteins already existing and create a tool combining a nanobody anti-GFP (GBP) with APEX. This GBP-APEX tool allows a simple and efficient detection of any GFP fusion proteins without the needs of specific antibodies nor the generation of additional constructions. We have shown the feasibility and efficiency of this method to detect various proteins in Drosophila ovarian follicles such as nuclear proteins, proteins associated with endocytic vesicles, plasma membranes or nuclear envelopes. Lastly, we expressed this tool in Drosophila with the UAS/GAL4 system that enables spatiotemporal control of the protein detection.

The careful control of Polo kinase by APC/C-Ube2C ensures the intercellular transport of germline centrosomes during Drosophila oogenesis

A feature of metazoan reproduction is the elimination of maternal centrosomes from the oocyte. In animals that form syncytial cysts during oogenesis, including Drosophila and human, all centrosomes within the cyst migrate to the oocyte where they are subsequently degenerated. The importance and the underlying mechanism of this event remain unclear. Here, we show that, during early Drosophila oogenesis, control of the Anaphase Promoting Complex/Cyclosome (APC/C), the ubiquitin ligase complex essential for cell cycle control, ensures proper transport of centrosomes into the oocyte through the regulation of Polo/Plk1 kinase, a critical regulator of the integrity and activity of the centrosome. We show that novel mutations in the APC/C-specific E2, Vihar/Ube2c, that affect its inhibitory regulation on APC/C cause precocious Polo degradation and impedes centrosome transport, through destabilization of centrosomes. The failure of centrosome migration correlates with weakened microtubule polarization in the cyst and allows ectopic microtubule nucleation in nurse cells, leading to the loss of oocyte identity. These results suggest a role for centrosome migration in oocyte fate maintenance through the concentration and confinement of microtubule nucleation activity into the oocyte. Considering the conserved roles of APC/C and Polo throughout the animal kingdom, our findings may be translated into other animals.

Signaling between somatic follicle cells and the germline patterns the egg and embryo of Drosophila

In Drosophila, specification of the embryonic body axes requires signaling between the germline and the somatic follicle cells. These signaling events are necessary to properly localize embryonic patterning determinants in the egg or eggshell during oogenesis. There are three maternal patterning systems that specify the anterior-posterior axis, and one that establishes the dorsal-ventral axis. We will first review oogenesis, focusing on the establishment of the oocyte and nurse cells and patterning of the follicle cells into different subpopulations. We then describe how two coordinated signaling events between the oocyte and follicle cells establish polarity of the oocyte and localize the anterior determinant bicoid, the posterior determinant oskar, and Gurken/epidermal growth factor (EGF), which breaks symmetry to initiate dorsal-ventral axis establishment. Next, we review how dorsal-ventral asymmetry of the follicle cells is transmitted to the embryo. This process also involves Gurken-EGF receptor (EGFR) signaling between the oocyte and follicle cells, leading to ventrally-restricted expression of the sulfotransferase Pipe. These events promote the ventral processing of Spaetzle, a ligand for Toll, which ultimately sets up the embryonic dorsal-ventral axis. We then describe the activation of the terminal patterning system by specialized polar follicle cells. Finally, we present open questions regarding soma-germline signaling during Drosophila oogenesis required for cell identity and embryonic axis formation.

Microtubule minus-end regulation at a glance

Microtubules are cytoskeletal filaments essential for numerous aspects of cell physiology. They are polarized polymeric tubes with a fast growing plus end and a slow growing minus end. In this Cell Science at a Glance article and the accompanying poster, we review the current knowledge on the dynamics and organization of microtubule minus ends. Several factors, including the γ-tubulin ring complex, CAMSAP/Patronin, ASPM/Asp, SPIRAL2 (in plants) and the KANSL complex recognize microtubule minus ends and regulate their nucleation, stability and interactions with partners, such as microtubule severing enzymes, microtubule depolymerases and protein scaffolds. Together with minus-end-directed motors, these microtubule minus-end targeting proteins (-TIPs) also control the formation of microtubule-organizing centers, such as centrosomes and spindle poles, and mediate microtubule attachment to cellular membrane structures, including the cell cortex, Golgi complex and the cell nucleus. Structural and functional studies are starting to reveal the molecular mechanisms by which dynamic -TIP networks control microtubule minus ends.

Centrosomal and Non-Centrosomal Microtubule-Organizing Centers (MTOCs) in Drosophila melanogaster

The centrosome is the best-understood microtubule-organizing center (MTOC) and is essential in particular cell types and at specific stages during Drosophila development. The centrosome is not required zygotically for mitosis or to achieve full animal development. Nevertheless, centrosomes are essential maternally during cleavage cycles in the early embryo, for male meiotic divisions, for efficient division of epithelial cells in the imaginal wing disc, and for cilium/flagellum assembly in sensory neurons and spermatozoa. Importantly, asymmetric and polarized division of stem cells is regulated by centrosomes and by the asymmetric regulation of their microtubule (MT) assembly activity. More recently, the components and functions of a variety of non-centrosomal microtubule-organizing centers (ncMTOCs) have begun to be elucidated. Throughout Drosophila development, a wide variety of unique ncMTOCs form in epithelial and non-epithelial cell types at an assortment of subcellular locations. Some of these cell types also utilize the centrosomal MTOC, while others rely exclusively on ncMTOCs. The impressive variety of ncMTOCs being discovered provides novel insight into the diverse functions of MTOCs in cells and tissues. This review highlights our current knowledge of the composition, assembly, and functional roles of centrosomal and non-centrosomal MTOCs in Drosophila.

Cytoskeletal control of nuclear migration in neurons and non-neuronal cells

Cell migration is a complex molecular event that requires translocation of a large, stiff nucleus, oftentimes through interstitial pores of submicron size in tissues. Remarkable progress in the past decade has uncovered an ever-increasing array of diverse nuclear dynamics and underlying cytoskeletal control in various cell models. In many cases, the microtubule motors dynein and kinesin directly interact with the nucleus via the LINC complex and steer directional nuclear movement, while actomyosin contractility and its global flow exert forces to deform and move the nucleus. In this review, I focus on the synergistic interplay of the cytoskeletal motors and spatiotemporal sites of force transmission in various nuclear migration models, with a special focus on neuronal migration in the vertebrate brain.

Nucleus positioning within Drosophila egg chamber

Both types of Drosophila egg chamber germ cells, i.e. oocyte and nurse cells, have to control their nucleus positions in order to produce a viable gamete. Interestingly, while actin microfilaments are crucial to position the nuclei in nurse cells, these are the microtubules that are important for oocyte nucleus to migrate and adopt the correct position. In this review, we discuss the mechanisms underlying these positioning processes in the two cell types with respect to the organization and dynamics of the actin and microtubule skeleton. In the nurse cells it is essential to keep firmly the nuclei in a central position to prevent them from obstructing the ring canals when the cytoplasmic content of the cells is dumped into the oocyte cells toward the end of oogenesis. This is achieved by the assembly of thick filopodia-like actin cables anchored to the plasma membrane, which grow inwardly and eventually encase tightly the nuclei in a cage-like structure. In the oocyte, the migration at an early stage of oogenesis of the nucleus from a posterior location to an anchorage site at an asymmetric anterior position, is an essential step in the setting up of the dorsoventral polarity axis of the future embryo. This process is controlled by an interplay between MT networks that just start to be untangled. Although both mechanisms have evolved to fulfill cell-type specific cell processes in the context of fly oogenesis, interesting parallels can be drawn with other nuclear positioning mechanisms in the mouse oocyte and the developing muscle respectively.