Therapy Insight: drugs for gastrointestinal disorders in pregnant women

News in pharmacology for the main medical pathologies of gestation

Obstetric diseases represent a highly complex medical challenge, especially regarding its clinical approach. The use of pharmacological agents during pregnancy is one of the main therapeutic alternatives in this group of patients; however, there is a general lack of knowledge about its use, efficacy, and possible adverse effects that may occur in routine clinical practice, even among medical professionals themselves. The high percentage of pregnant women who undergo drugs at some point during pregnancy, together with the developments that have occurred in recent years in the field of pharmacology, show the need for a detailed analysis that shows the existing current knowledge and helps in the clinical decision making. In this sense, the aim of this work is to conduct a review of the available scientific literature on the novelties in pharmacology for the main medical pathologies of pregnancy. Thus, the role of this field in analgesia, antibiotic therapy, digestive, respiratory, urological, psychiatric and neurological pathologies will be detailed, evaluating the indications, precautions and considerations that must be taken into account for its use.

Review of the Safety Profiles of Laxatives in Pregnant Women

Chronic constipation is one of the most common complaints seen in the gastroenterology clinic and is particularly prevalent in women. Women who become pregnant may suffer from existing constipation or develop constipation de novo. A thorough understanding of the safety of laxative therapies during pregnancy and the postpartum period is essential to successfully treating these women. Current understanding of the safety of both over the counter and prescription laxatives has not been adequately evaluated. In this article we provide an updated and comprehensive review of the safety profiles of laxatives that are currently used for the treatment of chronic constipation to aid the clinician in risk-benefit discussions with women who are currently or planning to become pregnant.

Gastrointestinal Diseases in Pregnancy: Nausea, Vomiting, Hyperemesis Gravidarum, Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease, Constipation, and Diarrhea

Many disorders of the gastrointestinal tract are common in pregnancy. Elevated levels of progesterone may lead to alterations in gastrointestinal motility which could contribute to nausea, vomiting, and/or GERD. Pregnancy-induced diarrhea may be due to elevated levels prostaglandins. This article reviews the normal physiologic and structural changes associated with pregnancy that could contribute to many of the common gastrointestinal complaints in pregnant patients. Additionally, the appropriate clinical and laboratory evaluations, other pathologic conditions that should be included in the differential, as well as the nonpharmacologic and pharmacologic therapies for each of these conditions is discussed.

Is a multispecies probiotic mixture effective in constipation during pregnancy? 'A pilot study'

BACKGROUND

Constipation during pregnancy is a common problem. Nowadays only few effective interventions are published preventing or treating constipation during pregnancy. However, their use is limited due to side-effects. This uncontrolled intervention study was performed to determine if a mixture of probiotics in the treatment of constipation during pregnancy is effective.

METHODS

Women aged ≥ 18 years with functional constipation were included at the Obstetrical outpatient clinic and midwife practices. Patients received during four weeks a daily dose of Ecologic®Relief (Bifidobacterium bifidum W23, Bifidobacterium lactis W52, Bifidobacterium longum W108, Lactobacillus casei W79, Lactobacillus plantarum W62 and Lactobacillus rhamnosus W71 (total 4*10⁹ CFU)). For all analyses, the non-parametric paired Wilcoxon test was used. Primary outcome measure was change in defecation frequency. Secondary outcome measures were stool consistency, sensation of incomplete evacuation, sensation of anorectal obstruction, manual manoeuvres to facilitate defecation, abdominal pain, adverse effects, presence of reflux episodes and intake of Bisacodyl.

RESULTS

20 women were included. Defecation frequency significantly increased from 3.1 at baseline to 6.7 in week four (p < 0.01). Compared to baseline, a significant decrease in 1) sensation of anorectal obstruction from 90.0% to 45.0% (p < 0.01), 2) sensation of incomplete evacuation from 90.0% to 40.0% (p < 0.01), 3) straining during defecation from 100% to 65% (p = 0.01), 4) episodes of abdominal pain from 60% to 20% (p = 0.01) and 5) the presence of reflux episodes from 60% to 20% in week four (p = 0.01) was found. Other secondary outcomes did not decrease significantly. No side effects were reported.

CONCLUSIONS

Ecologic®Relief is effective in the treatment of constipation during pregnancy. A randomised placebo controlled trial is required to confirm these data.

Peptic ulcer disease with related drug treatment in pregnant women and congenital abnormalities in their offspring

Peptic ulcer disease (PUD) is a common disease which can also occur in pregnant women. However, the possible association of PUD and related drug treatments in pregnant women with the risk of structural birth defects (i.e. congenital abnormalities [CA]) in their offspring has not been estimated in controlled population-based epidemiological studies. Thus, the prevalence of PUD in pregnant women who later delivered babies (cases) with different CA and in pregnant women who delivered newborns without CA (controls) was compared in the Hungarian Case-Control Surveillance of Congenital Abnormalities. Controls were matched to cases. Of 22,843 cases with congenital abnormalities, 182 (0.80%) had mothers with reported/recorded PUD, while of 38,151 controls, 261 (0.68%) were born to mothers with reported/recorded PUD. However, PUD(?) based on maternal information and/or unspecified diagnostic criteria, and PUD(!) based on endoscopic diagnosis showed different variables of mothers and newborn infants. Thus, finally, 20 case mothers and 58 control mothers with PUD(!) and related drugs were evaluated in detail. There was no higher risk for total CA group in the offspring of mothers with PUD during pregnancy (adjusted OR with 95% CI: 0.6, 0.3-0.9). Specific CA groups in cases were also assessed versus controls, but specified CA had no higher risk in the offspring of pregnant women with PUD and related drug treatments. In conclusion, a higher rate of CA was not found in the offspring of mothers with PUD.

No association between severe constipation with related drug treatment in pregnant women and congenital abnormalities in their offspring: A population-based case-control study

Constipation is a common pathological condition in pregnant women; nevertheless, its possible association with structural birth defects (i.e. congenital abnormalities [CA]) in their offspring has not been studied in controlled epidemiological studies. We evaluated the possible association between severe constipation with laxative treatment in pregnant women and congenital abnormalities in their offspring. The dataset of the population-based Hungarian Case-Control Surveillance System of Congenital Abnormalities (HCCSCA) 1980-1996 contained 22 843 cases with CA and 38 151 matched controls without CA. Only pregnant women with prospectively and medically recorded constipation were included in the study and 13 CA groups were compared in cases and all their matched controls. A total of 78 (0.34%) cases had mothers with severe constipation and treatment during pregnancy compared to 144 (0.38%) controls (adjusted OR with 95% CI = 1.0, 0.7-1.3). Specified groups of CA were also assessed versus controls, but a higher occurrence of pregnant women with severe constipation and related treatment was not found in any CA group. Among laxative drugs, senna has no teratogenic potential; thus, if severe constipation requires laxative drug treatment in pregnant women, senna is not contraindicated. A higher rate of CA was not found in the offspring of pregnant women with severe constipation and related senna treatment.

[Cholera and pregnancy: epidemiological, clinical, and evolutionary aspects]

OBJECTIVES

This descriptive study had for objective to describe the epidemiological, clinical, therapeutic, and evolutionary aspects of the association cholera and pregnancy during the cholera epidemic in Senegal in 2004 and 2005.

MATERIAL AND METHOD

We analyzed the files of pregnant women admitted in the infectious diseases department of the Fann national University Hospital for suspicion of cholera, from October 11, 2004 to December 31, 2005.

RESULTS

Fifty-two pregnant women were hospitalized and accounted for 1.76% of the patients admitted for cholera in the department. They were an average of 24+/-4.9 years of age and came from the Dakar suburbs in 60% of cases. The source of contagion was food and/or water in 70% of cases. These patients contracted the disease during the summer term of the pregnancy in 31% of cases. Clinically, they presented with a typical choleriform syndrome in 90% of cases, emesis in 100% of cases, and severe dehydration in 27% of cases. The coproculture for 14 women was positive for Vibrio cholerae in 12 cases. For treatment, these patients benefited from intravenous rehydration in 75% of cases and antibiotherapy with doxycyclin 300 mg in unidose. The following complications were noted: 6 abortions, 2 premature childbirths, and a maternal death.

CONCLUSION

The association cholera and pregnancy presents high risks for the fetus and for the mother, requiring a fast and adequate management.