Cerebral metastases—a therapeutic update

18F-DOPA PET/CT in brain tumors: impact on multidisciplinary brain tumor board decisions

PURPOSE

This study aimed to assess the therapeutic impact and diagnostic accuracy of ¹⁸F-DOPA PET/CT in patients with glioblastoma or brain metastases.

METHODS

Patients with histologically proven glioblastoma or brain metastases were prospectively included in this monocentric clinical trial (IMOTEP). Patients were included either due to a clinical suspicion of relapse or to assess residual tumor infiltration after treatment. Multimodality brain MRI and ¹⁸F-DOPA PET were performed. Patients' data were discussed during a Multidisciplinary Neuro-oncology Tumor Board (MNTB) meeting. The discussion was first based on clinical and MRI data, and an initial diagnosis and treatment plan were proposed. Secondly, a new discussion was conducted based on the overall imaging results, including ¹⁸F-DOPA PET. A second diagnosis and therapeutic plan were proposed. A retrospective and definitive diagnosis was obtained after a 3-month follow-up and considered as the reference standard.

RESULTS

One hundred six cases were prospectively investigated by the MNTB. All patients with brain metastases (N = 41) had a clinical suspicion of recurrence. The addition of ¹⁸F-DOPA PET data changed the diagnosis and treatment plan in 39.0% and 17.1% of patients' cases, respectively. Concerning patients with a suspicion of recurrent glioblastoma (N = 12), the implementation of ¹⁸F-DOPA PET changed the diagnosis and treatment plan in 33.3% of cases. In patients evaluated to assess residual glioblastoma infiltration after treatment (N = 53), ¹⁸F-DOPA PET data had a lower impact with only 5.7% (3/53) of diagnostic changes and 3.8% (2/53) of therapeutic plan changes. The definitive reference diagnosis was available in 98/106 patients. For patients with tumor recurrence suspicion, the adjunction of ¹⁸F-DOPA PET increased the Younden's index from 0.44 to 0.53 in brain metastases and from 0.2 to 1.0 in glioblastoma, reflecting an increase in diagnostic accuracy.

CONCLUSION

¹⁸F-DOPA PET has a significant impact on the management of patients with a suspicion of brain tumor recurrence, either glioblastoma or brain metastases, but a low impact when used to evaluate the residual glioblastoma infiltration after a first-line radio-chemotherapy or second-line bevacizumab.

(18)F-FDOPA PET for differentiating recurrent or progressive brain metastatic tumors from late or delayed radiation injury after radiation treatment

Brain metastases are frequently treated with radiation. It is critical to distinguish recurrent or progressive brain metastases (RPBM) from late or delayed radiation injury (LDRI). The purpose of this study was to examine the diagnostic accuracy as well as the prognostic power of 6-(18)F-fluoro-l-dopa ((18)F-FDOPA) PET for differentiating RPBM from LDRI.

METHODS

Thirty-two patients who had 83 previously irradiated brain metastases and who underwent (18)F-FDOPA PET because of an MR imaging-based suggestion of RPBM were studied retrospectively. PET studies were analyzed semiquantitatively (lesion-to-striatum and lesion-to-normal brain tissue ratios based on both maximum and mean standardized uptake values) and visually (4-point scale). The diagnostic accuracy of PET was verified by histopathologic analysis (n = 9) or clinical follow-up (n = 74) on a lesion-by-lesion basis. Receiver operating characteristic curve analysis was used to identify the best diagnostic indices. The power of (18)F-FDOPA PET to predict disease progression was evaluated with the Kaplan-Meier and Cox regression methods.

RESULTS

The best overall accuracy was achieved by visual scoring, with which a score of 2 or more (lesion uptake greater than or equal to striatum uptake) resulted in a sensitivity of 81.3% and a specificity of 84.3%. Semiquantitative (18)F-FDOPA PET uptake indices based on lesion-to-normal brain tissue ratios were significantly higher for RPBM than for LDRI. Among the various predictors tested, (18)F-FDOPA PET was the strongest predictor of tumor progression (hazard ratio, 6.26; P < 0.001), and the lesion-to-normal brain tissue ratio or visual score was the best discriminator. The mean time to progression was 4.6 times longer for lesions with negative (18)F-FDOPA PET results than for lesions with positive (18)F-FDOPA PET results (76.5 vs. 16.7 mo; P < 0.001). (18)F-FDOPA PET findings tended to predict overall survival.

CONCLUSION

Metabolic imaging with (18)F-FDOPA PET was useful for differentiating RPBM from LDRI. Semiquantitative indices, particularly lesion-to-normal uptake ratios, could be used. A visual score comparing tumor (18)F-FDOPA uptake and striatum (18)F-FDOPA uptake provided the highest sensitivity and specificity and was predictive of disease progression.

Chemotherapy and cerebral metastases: misperception or reality?

Cerebral metastases remain a common complication among patients with cancer. Surgery and radiotherapy remain the principal therapeutic interventions. In contrast, the benefit of chemotherapy has long been viewed with skepticism. Nonetheless, as survival in cancer patients improves and the incidence of cerebral metastases increases, so does the demand for effective therapies. It is now recognized that the blood-brain barrier within metastases is permeable and thus allows entry of otherwise excluded drugs. Limited data have suggested that cerebral metastases have modest sensitivity to chemotherapy. Furthermore, novel agents and delivery strategies have been developed to facilitate central nervous system penetration. Nonetheless, data are limited by methodological flaws, including heterogeneous inclusion criteria, small sample sizes, lack of randomization, and inconsistencies in defined end points and response assessment criteria. Well-designed clinical trials are needed to address the effect of chemotherapy. Acceptable control arms must be established to measure the effect of chemotherapies. Standardized response criteria and disease-specific studies are essential.