Optimum therapeutic approaches for lupus nephritis: what therapy and for whom?

Beyond pan-B-cell-directed therapy - new avenues and insights into the pathogenesis of SLE

New insights into the mechanisms of autoimmune diseases have been obtained not only from preclinical studies, but also from clinical trials of pan-B-cell-directed therapy. Overall, the results of these clinical trials suggest that more-specific approaches focusing on pathogenic B-cell functions, and perhaps sparing or even enhancing regulatory B-cell activity, might be attractive alternatives. Importantly, pathogenic B-cell subpopulations function within a network of cellular interactions, many of which might require additional interventions to restore immunologic balance and suppress autoimmune disease. Thus, approaches that simultaneously target innate immune cells as well as multiple nodes of T-cell and B-cell interactions might hold the promise of improved therapeutic efficacy. Interfering with B-cell intracellular signalling pathways, altering their intracellular metabolic pathways and perturbing transcription factors are additional options. This Review critically analyses these approaches, examines the role of cytokines and other functions of B-lineage cells separate from antibody secretion, and provides insights into the potential next generation of therapies targeting B-lineage cells.

Association between -1486 T>C and +1174 G>A single nucleotide polymorphisms in TLR9 gene and severity of lupus nephritis

Signaling through Toll-like receptor-9 (TLR9), a mediator of innate immune responses, could have a role in the pathogenesis of systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE). Some studies have shown an association between polymorphisms in the TLR9 gene and disease manifestations. We investigated whether two single nucleotide polymorphisms (-1486 T>C and +1174 G>A) in the TLR9 gene are associated with the risk of renal involvement in SLE. DNA samples from 112 SLE patients (62 with lupus nephritis) and 100 healthy controls were obtained. TLR9 polymorphisms (-1486 T>C and +1174 G>A) were analyzed by polymerase chain reaction–restriction fragment length polymorphism. Genotype and allelic frequencies were compared between lupus patients and healthy controls. Clinical and laboratory manifestations and activity scores on renal biopsy of patients with lupus nephritis were compared between various genotypes. There was no difference in the frequency of genotype or allele distribution at either of the two loci between lupus patients and controls and in lupus patients with or without nephritis. Patients with CC/CT genotype at the -1486 position had higher serum creatinine (P = 0.03) and Austin activity scores (P = 0.015). Patients with AA/AG genotype at +1174 position showed higher serum creatinine (P = 0.04), proteinuria (P = 0.011), anti-dsDNA titers (P < 0.001) and Austin activity scores (P = 0.003) than the GG genotype. Variations at the -1486 and +1174 positions of TLR9 gene are not associated with increased risk of SLE or that of kidney involvement in North Indians. CC/CT genotypes at -1486 and AA/AG at +1174 positions are associated with more severe kidney disease at presentation.

Mycophenolate mofetil or tacrolimus compared with intravenous cyclophosphamide in the induction treatment for active lupus nephritis

BACKGROUND

Although the use of aggressive immunosuppression has improved both patient and renal survival of patients with lupus nephritis (LN), the optimal treatment of LN remains challenging. The objective of this study is to assess the efficacy and safety of mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) and tacrolimus compared with intravenous cyclophosphamide (IVC) as induction therapies for active lupus nephritis (ALN).

METHODS

In this open-label, 24-week prospective study, 60 patients with biopsy-proven ALN (Classes III, IV, V or combination) were randomly assigned to receive MMF, tacrolimus or IVC in combination with corticosteroids. The remission of proteinuria, systemic lupus erythematosus disease active index and adverse events were compared.

RESULTS

The response rates at 24 weeks were 70% (14/20) in the MMF group, 75% (15/20) in the tacrolimus group and 60% (12/20) in the IVC group (P>0.05). The complete remission rates were also similar in the three groups (40, 45 and 30%, respectively; P>0.05). There were more cases of infection in the IVC group (8/20) and the MMF group (8/20) than the tacrolimus group (3/20) and more hyperglycemia in the tacrolimus group (5/20) than the other two groups (2 or 3/20), but the results were not statistically significant among the three groups. Proteinuria decreased and serum albumin increased more quickly in the patients treated with tacrolimus (P=0.0051 and P=0.048).

CONCLUSIONS

This pilot study suggests that both MMF and tacrolimus are possible alternatives to IVC as induction therapies for ALN in Chinese patients. Tacrolimus possibly results in a faster resolution of proteinuria and hypoalbuminemia. Further studies are necessary to determine the optimal dosage and duration of the therapies.

Nonmalignant diseases and treatments associated with primary ovarian failure: an expanded role for fertility preservation

Cancer treatments can be detrimental to fertility; recent literature has focused on the efforts of fertility preservation for this patient population. It should be recognized, however, that several nonmalignant medical conditions and therapeutic interventions could be similarly hazardous to fertility. Some of these nonmalignant diseases and their treatments that can adversely impact the reproductive axis are gastrointestinal diseases, rheumatologic disorders, nonmalignant hematologic conditions, neurologic disorders, renal disorders, gynecologic conditions, and metabolic diseases. Their negative effects on reproductive function are only now being appreciated and include impaired ovarian function, endocrine function, or sexual function and inability to carry a pregnancy to term. Complications and comorbidities associated with certain diseases may limit the success of established fertility preservation options. Recent advances in fertility preservation techniques may provide these patients with new options for childbearing. Here, we review several fertility-threatening conditions and treatments, describe current established and experimental fertility preservation options, and present three initiatives that may help minimize the adverse reproductive effects of these medical conditions and treatments by raising awareness of the issues and options: (1) increase awareness among practitioners about the reproductive consequences of specific diseases and treatments, (2) facilitate referral of patients to fertility-sparing or restorative programs, and (3) provide patient education about the risk of infertility at the time of diagnosis before initiation of treatment.

Saikosaponins: a potential treatment option for systemic lupus erythematosus

While the exact cause of systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) is still unknown, modern medicine has a number of effective treatments for this complex disorder. Corticosteroid hormones help reduce inflammation, antimalarial treatments address flare-ups and immunosuppressive medications work to keep the immune system in check. All these therapies are well tolerated, but accompany an increased risk of infection and nephrotoxicity. Recently, several studies showed that a number of natural and herbal products may also help some SLE patients deal with the debilitating symptoms. In this brief report, we proposed a traditional Chinese medicinal herb--Saikosaponins, and discussed its potential as a treatment option for SLE.

Mycophenolate mofetil is as efficacious as, but safer than, cyclophosphamide in the treatment of proliferative lupus nephritis: a meta-analysis and meta-regression

OBJECTIVE

Since mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) has emerged as an immunosuppressant for treating proliferative lupus nephritis, the role of cyclophosphamide (CYC)-containing regimens is being challenged. Efficacy data from randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and previous meta-analyses comparing these two agents for treating lupus nephritis have been inconsistent as they were heterogeneous in design and of small sample size. An updated meta-analysis is therefore required.

METHODS

Publications in the English literature were searched with the keywords 'mycophenoate', 'mycophenolic', 'lupus nephritis', 'nephritis' and 'glomerulonephritis' for RCTs in electronic databases. Primary outcome was relative risk (RR) of renal remission at 6 months. Secondary outcome included RRs of mortality, development of end-stage renal failure (ESRF) and side effects. Meta-regression was performed to identify factors explaining the heterogeneity of the effect sizes.

RESULTS

Ten eligible RCTs involving 847 patients were included. MMF offers similar efficacy in inducing renal remission as CYC (RR 1.052; 95% CI 0.950, 1.166) and the risks of death (RR 0.709; 95% CI 0.373, 1.347) and ESRF (RR 0.453; 95% CI 0.183, 1.121) were comparable. Significantly fewer patients receiving MMF developed amenorrhoea (RR 0.212; 95% CI 0.094, 0.479) and leucopenia (RR 0.473; 95% CI 0.269, 0.832) while the risks of herpes infection and pneumonia tended to be lower and that of diarrhoea appeared higher in the MMF groups. Meta-regression revealed that the non-white and non-Asian ethnicities contributed significantly to the heterogeneity of the effect sizes of renal remission.

CONCLUSION

MMF offers similar efficacy in renal remission and survival as CYC. MMF appears safer than CYC in the treatment of proliferative lupus nephritis.

Why can't we find a new treatment for SLE?

No new therapy for systemic lupus erythematosus has been approved. In the last decade, the development of several novel compounds has been pursued for lupus, but so far nothing has been proven to be effective. This review discusses some of the reasons why it may be so difficult to demonstrate that a novel therapy is effective for this disease. These include the complexity of the disease itself; the lack of reliable outcome measures; our limited understanding of the pathogenesis of the disease; the propensity of lupus patients to have bad outcomes and to react to medicines in unusual ways; the heterogeneity of the patient population; the unpredictable course of disease in individual patients; and the lack of reliable biomarkers. Although some of the tested targeted compounds that are apparently based on strong preclinical and mechanistic data may indeed not be effective therapies for SLE, it is hard not to believe that among the various specific agents now being tested that at least some of them should downregulate the abnormal immunoregulation characteristic of SLE, and thus be clinically effective. We need to be persistent and imaginative in identifying these effective agents and proving their efficacy so that they may be widely used in our lupus populations.

Update on the management of lupus nephritis: let the treatment fit the patient

The introduction of new therapeutic modalities, such as biologic agents, for the treatment of lupus nephritis has re-energized research into this disorder, enabling investigators to formulate evidence-based recommendations. Thus, it is now widely accepted that the management of lupus nephritis involves a period of intensive induction therapy, followed by a longer period of less-intensive maintenance therapy. Risk stratification, based on histologic, demographic, clinical and laboratory characteristics, allows the identification of patients at high risk of renal dysfunction, for whom aggressive therapy is likely to be the most beneficial. New studies and meta-analyses comparing mycophenolate mofetil with cyclophosphamide have confirmed the efficacy of the former for induction and maintenance therapy--particularly induction therapy, owing to its favorable toxicity profile; however, claims of efficacy superior to that of cyclophosphamide require additional documentation. Nonetheless, an increasing number of physicians use mycophenolate mofetil as induction therapy for most cases of proliferative lupus nephritis, while reserving cyclophosphamide for the most severe cases. No evidence yet indicates that mycophenolate mofetil is better than azathioprine for the maintenance of remission. For patients who relapse or who are unable to be treated with these agents, rituximab seems to offer some benefit with an acceptable toxicity profile. This article summarizes the advances in the management of lupus nephritis since our 2005 Review.

Pharmacotherapy of lupus nephritis: time for a consensus?

BACKGROUND

The optimal therapy for lupus nephritis has been the subject of considerable debate.

OBJECTIVE

To provide evidence- and expert-based recommendations.

METHODS

To review the literature and the European League Against Rheumatism recommendations.

RESULTS

Risk stratification based on histological, demographical, clinical and laboratory characteristics allows the identification of patients at high risk for loss of renal function, and thus more likely to benefit from more aggressive therapy. Achieving remission within the first months of treatment, irrespective of the agent used, correlates with good long-term renal outcomes; maintenance of remission can be achieved with less toxic therapies. Aggressive management of atherosclerosis risk factors and renoprotective therapy for those patients with chronic renal disease improve long-term survival and prognosis.

Successful rituximab-CHOP treatment of systemic lupus erythematosus associated with diffuse large B-cell non-Hodgkin lymphoma

The authors discuss the case of a 76-year-old female patient who has been suffering from subacute cutaneous lupus erythematosus since 1983. In 1999 she was diagnosed with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) based on her symptoms of malar rash, polyarthritis, leukopenia, autoimmune hemolytic anemia and positive anti-DNA antibody test. For this she received methylprednisolone and cyclophosphamide. After 3 years of remission, symptoms of cutaneous vasculitis appeared in 2004, which transitionally responded to treatment with azathioprin and methylprednisolone. Her cutaneous symptoms, however, progressed quickly along with generalized lymphadenopathy, splenomegaly and thrombocytopenia. Immunohistological evaluation of the lymph node biopsy showed diffuse large B-cell lymphoma. She developed complete remission after treatment with six-cycle R-CHOP (rituximab, and reduced doses of cyclophosphamide, vincristin, adriablastin, methylprednisolone). SLE became inactive and her symptoms of vasculitis resolved. The authors are bringing attention to one of the possible late complications of systemic lupus, and also underscoring that treatment with rituximab (+CHOP) was beneficial not only for the lymphoma but the SLE as well.

[Renal manifestations in rheumatic diseases]

Inflammatory rheumatic diseases other than systemic vasculitides and systemic lupus erythematosus are frequently associated with renal abnormalities, which are clinically less apparent due to the subtle course and the often only moderate impairment of renal function. These abnormalities include vascular, glomerular and tubulointerstitial changes. Renal manifestations in the course of rheumatoid arthritis influence the prognosis of the disease. Renal involvement due to AA amyloidosis following long-standing inflammatory joint disease can lead slowly, over years, to end-stage renal disease. A scleroderma renal crisis in the course of systemic sclerosis can potentially result in end-stage renal disease within days. The differential diagnosis of renal abnormalities in a rheumatic patient should include drug induced renal impairment as well as infection.