Management of the valve–bladder syndrome and congenital bladder obstruction: the role of nocturnal bladder drainage

Posterior urethral valves: Role of prenatal diagnosis and long-term management of bladder function; a single center point of view and review of literature

Posterior Urethral Valves (PUV) are the most common cause of lower urinary tract obstruction. More severe forms are detected early in pregnancy (mainly type I), while other forms are usually discovered later in childhood when investigating lower urinary tract symptoms. Bladder dysfunction is common and is associated with urinary incontinence in about 55% (0%-72%). Despite the removal of the obstruction by urethral valve ablation, pathological changes of the urinary tract can occur with progressive bladder dysfunction, which can cause deterioration of the upper urinary tract as well. For this reason, all children with PUV require long-term follow-up, always until puberty, and in many cases life-long. Therefore, management of PUV is not only limited to obstruction relief, but prevention and treatment of bladder dysfunction, based on urodynamic observations, is paramount. During time, urodynamic patterns may change from detrusor overactivity to decreased compliance/small capacity bladder, to myogenic failure (valve bladder). In the past, an aggressive surgical approach was performed in all patients, and valve resection was considered an emergency procedure. With the development of fetal surgery, vesico-amniotic shunting has been performed as well. Due to improvements of prenatal ultrasound, the presence of PUV is usually already suspected during pregnancy, and subsequent treatment should be performed in high-volume centers, with a multidisciplinary, more conservative approach. This is considered to be more effective and safer. Primary valve ablation is performed after clinical stability and is no longer considered an emergency procedure after birth. During childhood, a multidisciplinary approach (pediatric urologist, nephrologist, urotherapist) is recommended as well in all patients, to improve toilet training, using an advanced urotherapy program with medical treatments and urodynamic evaluations. The aim of this paper is to present our single center experience over 30 years.

Impact of surgical intervention on progression to end-stage renal disease in patients with posterior urethral valve

Background

Posterior urethral valve patients present with varied presentations at any age of life and have significant associated morbidity and require long-term follow-up and care.

Methods

This was a single-center ambispective cohort study carried out over a period of 2 years. Patient data regarding the symptoms, investigations, interventions, secondary complications were recorded and were followed up regularly during the study till either normalization of their creatinine level which was maintained up to one-year post-fulguration (non-CKD) or progression to end-stage renal disease (ESRD) requiring renal transplant. Various clinical factors were then compared between these groups.

Results

The age of presentation varies from 6 months antenatal period to a maximum of 34 years. Most common symptom was of lower urinary tract obstruction, followed by recurrent febrile UTI. The interval between disease presentation detection and PU valve fulguration ranged from 6 days to more than 5 years, median duration being 1 month. 85.7% patients had hydroureteronephrosis on initial USG. In VCUG, there was no significant difference found between the presence of reflux and poor renal outcome. Age of presentation greater than 2 years was seen in 52% of patients with CKD compared to only 10% patients in non-CKD group (significant, p value 0.02). Among patients who developed CKD, 60% of patients had PU valve fulguration after one month of disease presentation, while in contrast, among the non-CKD group, 80% of patients had it done within one month of disease presentation. (significant, p value 0.03).

Conclusions

Late age of presentation, delayed fulguration with high initial creatinine, and failure of serum creatinine to return to normal after one-month post-fulguration are important risk factors in the progression of the disease to ESRD. Symptomatic improvement after interventions does not correlate with progression to ESRD. The number of interventions also does not predict progression to ESRD. Interventions should be chosen wisely on case to restore near-normal physiology and delay progression to ESRD.

Comparative outcome analysis of pediatric kidney transplant in posterior urethral valves children with or without pretransplant Mitrofanoff procedure

BACKGROUND

Urinary diversion using catheterizable channel among posterior urethral valve (PUV) patients may help to alleviate the functional concerns of the bladder on the allograft. Herein, we review our series of PUV patients undergoing renal transplants at a single institution to determine outcomes between those with and without pretransplant Mitrofanoff.

METHODS

PUV cases in our transplant database from 2000 to 2017 were identified. Data collected included clinical demographics, presentation of PUV, bladder function, implementation of dialysis and donor type. Post-transplant variables included graft function, and bladder function including incontinence and UTI development. Comparison between with vs without pretransplant Mitrofanoff patient groups was performed using Fisher's exact and t test analysis.

RESULTS

Overall, 22 cases were analyzed. The majority (77%) had a prenatal diagnosis of PUV, and 23% had a symptomatic presentation. Pretransplant Mitrofanoffs were performed in 40.9% of cases. The overall age at transplant was 10 ± 5 years. Five percent experienced post-transplant incontinence and 23% UTIs. No difference between groups was noted in variables including age at transplant, the timing of PUV diagnosis. Mitrofanoff group patients had more symptomatic febrile UTIs than those without Mitrofanoff (67% vs 15%; P = .03); however, there was no difference in post-transplant UTI development. Furthermore, the Mitrofanoff group seems to have later onset of dialysis or need for transplant (age at the start of dialysis 36 ± 56 vs 156 ± 25 months, P < .001).

CONCLUSION

Our study suggests that patients with early PUV diagnoses who develop symptomatic UTI may benefit from early creation of a Mitrofanoff cathetherizable channel, which is associated with delayed ESRD progression and need for dialysis.

Consensus on the Management of Posterior Urethral Valves from Antenatal Period to Puberty

The need for successful management of posterior urethral valves always captivates the minds of pediatric surgeons. Its success, however, depends on several factors ranging from prenatal preservation of upper tracts to postoperative pharmacological compliance. Regardless of measures available, some cases do not respond and progress to end stage. The management depends on several issues ranging from age and severity at presentation to long-term follow-up and prevention of secondary renal damage and managing valve bladder syndrome. This article is based on a consensus to the set of questionnaires, prepared by research section of Indian Association of Paediatric Surgeons and discussed by experienced pediatric surgeons based in different institutions in the country. Standard operating procedures for conducting a voiding cystourethrogram and cystoscopy were formulated. Age-wise contrast dosage was calculated for ready reference. Current evidence from literature was also reviewed and included to complete the topic.

Pre-transplant management of valve bladder: a critical literature review

OBJECTIVE

Indications, timing and problems related to augmentation cystoplasty (AC), in the context of posterior urethral valves (PUV) and renal transplantation (RT) are ill defined. Associated bladder dysfunction (BD) is not a stable condition and may cause the loss of the renal graft. Polyuria, accentuates BD and seems to improve after RT. The objective of this research is to critically review the available literature, aiming to rationalize the treatment of PUV with BD in the context of end stage renal disease (ESRD).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A thorough literature review was performed. Pertinent papers were, critically analyzed and classified according to the level of evidence.

RESULTS

Data relating to PUV, RT and AC showed low levels of evidence. Results of RT in PUV cases with adequate management of BD were comparable to those suffering from other causes of ESRD. Bladder function can recover spontaneously after urinary undiversion. There were no established criteria to indicate AC in the context of ESRD and PUV or to define the ideal protocol to treat associated vesicoureteral reflux (VUR). Urinary tract infections (UTIs) were more frequent in transplanted PUV patients; this is possibly related to the inadequate control of BD, especially after AC. AC is feasible after RT with outcomes comparable to preemptive ones.

CONCLUSION

AC increases the risk of UTI after RT. Preemptive AC should be constructed only if the risks associated with increased bladder pressures exceed those associated with AC. Adequate management of BD is essential to improve bladder function and to minimize UTIs. AC is feasible after RT, with complication rates similar to the ones performed beforehand. Since a considerable number of PUV patients with high-pressure bladders eventually develop myogenic failure, it seems logical to postponing AC in this population, as long as they are under close surveillance.

Vesicoureteral reflux--the role of bladder and bowel dysfunction

Vesicoureteral reflux (VUR) is a significant risk factor for clinical pyelonephritis and renal scarring. In 2010, the American Urological Association (AUA) reported that bladder and bowel dysfunction (BBD), which is common in patients with VUR, increases the risk of breakthrough UTI in children receiving antibiotic prophylaxis, reduces the success rate for endoscopic injection therapy, and increases the risk of postoperative UTI, irrespective of the surgical success rate for VUR. Accordingly, physicians are strongly recommended to investigate BBD in their patients with VUR. Symptoms and signs of BBD include urinary frequency and urgency, prolonged voiding intervals, daytime wetting, perineal and penile pain, holding manoeuvres (posturing to prevent wetting), constipation, and encopresis. Primary assessment tools include the Pediatric Symptom Checklist, urinalysis, urine culture, bladder diary, measurement of the postvoid residual urine volume, Dysfunctional Voiding Symptom Score, uroflow with electromyography, and Bristol Stool Form Score. The Rome III criteria can also be used for diagnostic assessment of bowel function. Treatment of BBD should be individualized, directed at symptomatic and objective improvement, and can include behavioural modification, biofeedback, selective use of anticholinergics and α-blockers, and bowel management.