1
|
Moura GAD, Monteiro PB. Cytotoxic Activity of Antineoplastic Agents on Fertility: A Systematic Review. REVISTA BRASILEIRA DE GINECOLOGIA E OBSTETRÍCIA 2020; 42:759-768. [PMID: 33254272 PMCID: PMC10309244 DOI: 10.1055/s-0040-1713911] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/22/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To analyze the long-term effects of antineoplastic treatments on patient fertility. SELECTION OF STUDIES The studies were selected through the New PubMed, Scielo and Lilacs databases along with references used for the creation of the present work. For the selection of studies, articles published between the periods from January 1, 2015 to April 6, 2020 in the English, Portuguese and Spanish languages were used. As inclusion criteria: cohort studies and studies conducted in vitro. As exclusion criteria: review articles, reported cases, studies that do not address thematic reproduction, studies that do not address the cancer theme, articles that used animals, articles that address the preservation of fertility and articles in duplicate in the bases. DATA COLLECTION The collected data included: age of the patient at the beginning of treatment, type of neoplasm, type of antineoplastic treatment, chemotherapy used, radiotherapy dosage, radiotherapy site, effect of antineoplastic agents on fertility and number of patients in the study. DATA SYNTHESIS Thirty studies were evaluated, antineoplastic chemotherapy agents and radiotherapy modulate serum hormone levels, reduces germ cell quantities and correlated with an increase in sterility rates. The effects mentioned occur in patients in the prepubertal and postpubertal age. CONCLUSION Antineoplastic treatments have cytotoxic effects on the germ cells leading to hormonal modulation, and pubertal status does not interfere with the cytotoxic action of therapies.
Collapse
|
2
|
von Wolff M, Nawroth F. Fertilitätsprotektion bei onkologischen und nichtonkologischen Erkrankungen. GYNAKOLOGISCHE ENDOKRINOLOGIE 2020. [DOI: 10.1007/s10304-020-00322-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
|
3
|
|
4
|
von Wolff M, Germeyer A, Liebenthron J, Korell M, Nawroth F. Practical recommendations for fertility preservation in women by the FertiPROTEKT network. Part II: fertility preservation techniques. Arch Gynecol Obstet 2017; 297:257-267. [PMID: 29181578 PMCID: PMC5762782 DOI: 10.1007/s00404-017-4595-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 59] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/30/2017] [Accepted: 11/10/2017] [Indexed: 12/24/2022]
Abstract
Purpose In addition to guidelines focusing on scientific evidence, practical recommendations on fertility preservation are also needed. Methods A selective literature search was performed based on the clinical and scientific experience of the authors. This article (Part II) focuses on fertility preservation techniques. Part I, also published in this journal, provides information on disease prognosis, disease-specific therapy, and risks for loss of fertility. Results Ovarian stimulation including double stimulation and freezing of oocytes is the best-established therapy providing live birth chances in women < 35 years with high ovarian reserve of around 30–40%. Ovarian tissue freezing is especially useful in young women with good ovarian, if spontaneous conception is favoured and if < 1 week until chemotherapy is provided. Data on success rates are still limited, but this further evolving technique will possibly reach similar success rates as ovarian stimulation. GnRH agonists seem to reduce the risk of premature ovarian failure up to 50%; however, the effect is possibly not long-lasting. Ovarian transposition can easily be combined with freezing of ovarian tissue and is the preferred technique before pelvic radiotherapy. Other techniques, such as in vitro maturation, are limited to women with high ovarian reserve and remain less effective. In addition, procedures such as in vitro growth of follicles, etc. are still experimental. Conclusions Fertility preservation in women provides realistic chances of becoming pregnant. The choice of technique needs to be based on the time required, the woman’s age, its risks and efficacy, and the individual preference of the patient.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michael von Wolff
- Division of Gynaecological Endocrinology and Reproductive Medicine, Medical University of Berne, Berne, Switzerland.
- Division of Gynaecological Endocrinology and Reproductive Medicine, University Women's hospital, Inselspital Bern, Effingerstrasse 102, 3010, Bern, Switzerland.
| | - A Germeyer
- Department of Gynaecological Endocrinology and Fertility Disorders, Medical University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - J Liebenthron
- Department of Gynaecological Endocrinology and Reproductive Medicine, Medical University of Bonn, Bonn, Germany
| | - M Korell
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Johanna Etienne Hospital of Neuss, Neuss, Germany
| | - F Nawroth
- Centre for Infertility, Prenatal Medicine, Endocrinology and Osteology, Amedes Hamburg, Hamburg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Kim SY, Kim SK, Lee JR, Woodruff TK. Toward precision medicine for preserving fertility in cancer patients: existing and emerging fertility preservation options for women. J Gynecol Oncol 2016; 27:e22. [PMID: 26768785 PMCID: PMC4717227 DOI: 10.3802/jgo.2016.27.e22] [Citation(s) in RCA: 83] [Impact Index Per Article: 10.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/18/2023] Open
Abstract
As the number of young cancer survivors increases, quality of life after cancer treatment is becoming an ever more important consideration. According to a report from the American Cancer Society, approximately 810,170 women were diagnosed with cancer in 2015 in the United States. Among female cancer survivors, 1 in 250 are of reproductive age. Anticancer therapies can result in infertility or sterility and can have long-term negative effects on bone health, cardiovascular health as a result of reproductive endocrine function. Fertility preservation has been identified by many young patients diagnosed with cancer as second only to survival in terms of importance. The development of fertility preservation technologies aims to help patients diagnosed with cancer to preserve or protect their fertility prior to exposure to chemo- or radiation therapy, thus improving their chances of having a family and enhancing their quality of life as a cancer survivor. Currently, sperm, egg, and embryo banking are standard of care for preserving fertility for reproductive-age cancer patients; ovarian tissue cryopreservation is still considered experimental. Adoption and surrogate may also need to be considered. All patients should receive information about the fertility risks associated with their cancer treatment and the fertility preservation options available in a timely manner, whether or not they decide to ultimately pursue fertility preservation. Because of the ever expanding number of options for treating cancer and preserving fertility, there is now an opportunity to take a precision medicine approach to informing patients about the fertility risks associated with their cancer treatment and the fertility preservation options that are available to them.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- So-Youn Kim
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL, USA.
| | - Seul Ki Kim
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seongnam, Korea.,Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Jung Ryeol Lee
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seongnam, Korea.,Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Teresa K Woodruff
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL, USA
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Woodruff TK. Oncofertility: a grand collaboration between reproductive medicine and oncology. Reproduction 2015; 150:S1-10. [PMID: 26130814 PMCID: PMC4710491 DOI: 10.1530/rep-15-0163] [Citation(s) in RCA: 69] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/09/2015] [Accepted: 06/29/2015] [Indexed: 01/01/2023]
Abstract
In 2007, I was asked by the University of Calgary to participate in a symposium called 'Pushing the Boundaries--Advances that Will Change the World in 20 Years'. My topic was oncofertility, a word I had just coined to describe the intersection of two disciplines--oncology and fertility--and I was thrilled to share my passion for this new field and help young women with cancer protect their future reproductive health. Fertility preservation in the cancer setting lacked a concerted effort to bridge the disciplines in an organized manner. In early 2015, I was delighted to deliver a presentation for the Society for Reproduction and Fertility titled 'Sex in Three Cities', where I gave an update on the oncofertility movement, a remarkable cross-disciplinary, global collaboration created to address the fertility preservation needs of young cancer patients. During my tour of the UK, I was impressed by the interest among the society and its members to engage colleagues outside the discipline as well as the public in a dialogue about cutting-edge reproductive science. In this invited review, I will describe the work of the Oncofertility Consortium to provide fertility preservation options in the cancer setting and accelerate the acceptance of this critical topic on a global scale. I hope that one day this word and field it created will change the world for women who had been left out of the equation for far too long.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Teresa K Woodruff
- The Thomas J Watkins Professor of Obstetrics and GynecologyDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, 303 E Superior Street, Lurie 10-250, Chicago, Illinois 60611, USA
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Thomin A, Torre A, Daraï É, Chabbert-Buffet N. [Role of GnRH agonists in preserving female fertility]. ACTA ACUST UNITED AC 2013; 43:267-74. [PMID: 24321862 DOI: 10.1016/j.jgyn.2013.11.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/11/2013] [Revised: 10/30/2013] [Accepted: 11/06/2013] [Indexed: 11/18/2022]
Abstract
The impact of cancer treatment on ovarian function and fertility has been known since the 70s. Preservation of fertility is now an important focus of care for patients of reproductive age with cancer. The beneficial role of GnRH agonists in fertility preservation is controversial since the early 2000s. Recent randomized studies come to overturn this role. The POEMS multicenter randomized trial with long-term follow-up is ongoing and will provide results that could help clarify the current uncertain indication of these compounds in this context.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- A Thomin
- Service de gynécologie obstétrique, médecine de la reproduction, hôpital Tenon, AP-HP, 4, rue de la Chine, 75020 Paris, France.
| | - A Torre
- Service de gynécologie obstétrique, médecine de la reproduction, centre hospitalier intercommunal Poissy, 78300 Saint-Germain-en-Laye, France
| | - É Daraï
- Service de gynécologie obstétrique, médecine de la reproduction, hôpital Tenon, AP-HP, 4, rue de la Chine, 75020 Paris, France
| | - N Chabbert-Buffet
- Service de gynécologie obstétrique, médecine de la reproduction, hôpital Tenon, AP-HP, 4, rue de la Chine, 75020 Paris, France
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Tsai YC, Tzeng CR, Wang CW, Hsu MI, Tan SJ, Chen CH. Antiapoptotic agent sphingosine-1-phosphate protects vitrified murine ovarian grafts. Reprod Sci 2013; 21:236-43. [PMID: 23793475 DOI: 10.1177/1933719113493515] [Citation(s) in RCA: 23] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/06/2023]
Abstract
Significant follicle loss from frozen ovarian grafts is unavoidable. The authors evaluated the protective effects of the antiapoptotic agent sphingosine-1-phosphate (S1P) on vitrified ovarian grafts. Three-week-old sexually immature female FVB mice were divided into 4 groups, fresh, control without S1P, 0.5 mmol/L S1P, and 2 mmol/L S1P. The ovaries were pretreated with S1P for 1 hour and then cryopreserved by modified vitrification. The frozen-thawed ovaries were autotransplanted under the back muscles of mice for 10 days. Expression of apoptosis-related genes encoding caspase 3 and c-Myc was analyzed in the vitrified ovaries and 10 days after transplantation using real-time quantitative polymerase chain reaction. To quantify the ovarian reserve, anti-Müllerian hormone (AMH) levels and follicles were measured in the 10-day vitrified ovarian grafts. Caspase 3 and c-Myc messenger RNA did not differ significantly in the 4 groups after vitrification but was significantly upregulated in the control group after transplantation. The AMH levels and primordial follicle pool were significantly higher in the S1P-treated groups than in the control group but lower than that in the fresh group. The S1P protects vitrified ovarian grafts from ischemic reperfusion injury rather than from vitrification-associated process.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yung-Chieh Tsai
- 1Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Chi-Mei Medical Center, Tainan, Taiwan
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
9
|
Kerr JB, Hutt KJ, Michalak EM, Cook M, Vandenberg CJ, Liew SH, Bouillet P, Mills A, Scott CL, Findlay JK, Strasser A. DNA damage-induced primordial follicle oocyte apoptosis and loss of fertility require TAp63-mediated induction of Puma and Noxa. Mol Cell 2012; 48:343-52. [PMID: 23000175 DOI: 10.1016/j.molcel.2012.08.017] [Citation(s) in RCA: 194] [Impact Index Per Article: 16.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/13/2012] [Revised: 05/14/2012] [Accepted: 08/14/2012] [Indexed: 12/23/2022]
Abstract
Trp63, a transcription factor related to the tumor suppressor p53, is activated by diverse stimuli and can initiate a range of cellular responses. TAp63 is the predominant Trp53 family member in primordial follicle oocyte nuclei and is essential for their apoptosis triggered by DNA damage in vivo. After γ-irradiation, induction of the proapoptotic BH3-only members Puma and Noxa was observed in primordial follicle oocytes from WT and Trp53(-/-) mice but not in those from TAp63-deficient mice. Primordial follicle oocytes from mice lacking Puma or both Puma and Noxa were protected from γ-irradiation-induced apoptosis and, remarkably, could produce healthy offspring. Hence, PUMA and NOXA are critical for DNA damage-induced, TAp63-mediated primordial follicle oocyte apoptosis. Thus, blockade of PUMA may protect fertility during cancer therapy and prevent premature menopause, improving women's health.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jeffrey B Kerr
- Department of Anatomy and Developmental Biology, Monash University, Clayton, Victoria 3168, Australia
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
10
|
Grynberg M, Poulain M, Sebag-Peyrelevade S, le Parco S, Fanchin R, Frydman N. Ovarian tissue and follicle transplantation as an option for fertility preservation. Fertil Steril 2012; 97:1260-8. [PMID: 22656306 DOI: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2012.04.042] [Citation(s) in RCA: 65] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/29/2012] [Revised: 04/26/2012] [Accepted: 04/26/2012] [Indexed: 01/02/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To review and summarize data from the scientific literature on ovarian tissue and follicle transplantation as an option for fertility preservation. DESIGN Review of pertinent literature. SETTING University hospital. PATIENT(S) Women having undergone ovarian tissue transplantation. INTERVENTION(S) None. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S) Review of the literature. RESULT(S) Over the last decade, the field of ovarian transplantation and cryopreservation has significantly progressed, becoming applicable in humans. Indeed, fresh and frozen cortical ovarian tissue transplantations have been successfully reported worldwide, resulting in around 28 healthy babies. Although ovarian-tissue harvesting seems to be safe, the risk of reimplantation of cancer from ovarian cortical transplants cannot be estimated at this time. As a consequence, auto-transplantation of ovarian tissue in women having suffered from systemic hematological malignancies is not recommended. In these situations, reimplantation of isolated ovarian follicles might represent an interesting option in the future. CONCLUSION(S) Although the clinical experience is limited, the robust results obtained open new perspectives for the management of premature ovarian failure resulting or not from gonadotoxic treatments.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michael Grynberg
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology and Reproductive Medicine, Hôpital Antoine Béclère, Clamart, France.
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
11
|
Kupka M, Dittrich R, Nawroth F, von Wolff M. Fertilitätsprotektion bei Frauen. GYNAKOLOGISCHE ENDOKRINOLOGIE 2012. [DOI: 10.1007/s10304-011-0456-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/28/2022]
|