Aurora kinases dawn as cancer drug targets

Why Great Mitotic Inhibitors Make Poor Cancer Drugs

Chemotherapy is central to oncology, perceived to operate only on prolific cancerous tissue. Yet, many non-neoplastic tissues are more prolific compared with typical tumors. Chemotherapies achieve sufficient therapeutic windows to exert antineoplastic activity because they are prodrugs that are bioactivated in cancer-specific environments. The advent of precision medicine has obscured this concept, favoring the development of high-potency kinase inhibitors. Inhibitors of essential mitotic kinases exemplify this paradigm shift, but intolerable on-target toxicities in more prolific normal tissues have led to repeated failures in the clinic. Proliferation rates alone cannot be used to achieve cancer specificity. Here, we discuss integrating the cancer specificity of prodrugs from classical chemotherapeutics and the potency of mitotic kinase inhibitors to generate a class of high-precision cancer therapeutics.

Novel Prognostic Factors Associated with Cell Cycle Control in Sporadic Medullary Thyroid Cancer Patients

BACKGROUND

Medullary thyroid cancer (MTC) is a rare neuroendocrine-derived malignancy. It is represented by sporadic and familiar forms, and both can have RET oncogene mutations. Numerous markers can be used to define MTC; however, none is generally approved for predicting the outcome of sporadic MTC.

AIM

The aim of this work was to analyze PTTG1/securin and Aurora kinase A expressions in MTC patients, both at the gene and protein levels, and to define their prognostic role in MTC assessing their association with lab and clinical parameters.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Seventy-one sporadic MTC human samples were analyzed for RET mutations and by qPCR for PTTG1 and AURKA (Aurora kinase A) expression. Ki-67 levels and western blot reactivity for PTTG1 and Aurora kinase A were also determined in a selected cohort of patients.

RESULTS

RET somatic mutations were found in 48% of the patients (34/71). PTTG1 expression was statistically different among the groups with or without regional lymph node metastasis (p < 0.0001) and advanced stage disease (p < 0.01). PTTG1 and AURKA expressions were statistically higher than those of controls (p = 0.01 and p < 0.002, respectively). PTTG1 expression and Ki-67 levels were statistically different among the groups with remitted or persistent disease (p < 0.05 and p < 0.01, respectively). We found a significant correlation between the expressions of AURKA and PTTG1 (p < 0.0002, r = 0.5298) and between the expressions of PTTG1 and Ki-67 (p = 0.01). Ki-67 levels were statistically different among the groups with or without metastatic lymph nodes (p = 0.01) or distant metastases (p = 0.003).

CONCLUSION

The presence of an altered expression of PTTG1 and AURKA is a negative prognostic factor associated with a more aggressive course of disease, such as an advanced stage or disease persistence. It emerges as a cell cycle process mediated by the 2 factors, in addition to the RET pathway, which can be altered in MTC patients.

Non-centrosomal TPX2-Dependent Regulation of the Aurora A Kinase: Functional Implications for Healthy and Pathological Cell Division

Aurora A has been extensively characterized as a centrosomal kinase with essential functions during cell division including centrosome maturation and separation and spindle assembly. However, Aurora A localization is not restricted to the centrosomes and compelling evidence support the existence of specific mechanisms of activation and functions for non-centrosomal Aurora A in the dividing cell. It has been now well established that spindle assembly involves an acentrosomal RanGTP-dependent pathway that triggers microtubule assembly and organization in the proximity of the chromosomes whether centrosomes are present or not. The mechanism involves the regulation of a number of NLS-containing proteins, generically called SAFS (Spindle Assembly Factors) that exert their functions upon release from karyopherins by RanGTP. One of them, the nuclear protein TPX2 interacts with and activates Aurora A upon release from importins by RanGTP. This basic mechanism triggers the activation of Aurora A in the proximity of the chromosomes potentially translating the RanGTP signaling gradient centered on the chromosome into an Aurora A phosphorylation network. Here, we will review our current knowledge on the RanGTP-dependent TPX2 activation of Aurora A away from centrosomes: from the mechanism of activation and its functional consequences on the kinase stability and regulation to its roles in spindle assembly and cell division. We will then focus on the substrates of the TPX2-activated Aurora A having a role in microtubule nucleation, stabilization, and organization. Finally, we will briefly discuss the implications of the use of Aurora A inhibitors in anti-tumor therapies in the light of its functional interaction with TPX2.

Recent advances in the development of Aurora kinases inhibitors in hematological malignancies

Over the last two decades, since the discovery of Drosophila mutants in 1995, much effort has been made to understand Aurora kinase biology. Three mammalian subtypes have been identified thus far which include the Aurora A, B and C kinases. These regulatory proteins specifically work at the cytoskeleton and chromosomal structures between the kinetochores and have vital functions in the early phases of the mitotic cell cycle. Today, there are multiple phase I and phase II clinical trials as well as numerous preclinical studies taking place looking at Aurora kinase inhibitors in both hematologic and solid malignancies. This review focuses on the preclinical and clinical development of Aurora kinase inhibitors in hematological malignancy and discusses their therapeutic potential.

Synthesis and investigation of new Hesperadin analogues antitumor effects on HeLa cells

Hesperadin is one of the indolinones that was designed against the ATP-binding site of Aurora kinase. This molecule inhibits Aurora B kinase by phosphorylation of histone H3. In this study, new derivatives of Hesperadin containing an amide group in their structures were synthesized through sequential Ugi/palladium-catalyzed approach and in vitro antitumor activity of new compounds were evaluated by cell proliferation assay. The results show that compounds 6f, 6i, 6l, and 6o were dose-dependently inhibited in different concentrations, and IC50 values were between 35 and 43 nM. It seems that lipophilic substitution on the indolinone core with the ability to form additional hydrogen bond might lead to increased stability of structure and activity of new Hesperadin analogues.

Targeting cell cycle kinases and kinesins in anticancer drug development

The cell cycle is regulated by kinases such as the cyclin-dependent kinases (CDKs) and non-CDKs, which include Aurora and polo-like kinases, as well as checkpoint proteins. Mitotic kinesins are involved in the establishment of the mitotic spindle formation and function, and also play a role in cell cycle control. The disruption of the cell cycle is a hallmark of malignancy. Genetic or epigenetic events result in the upregulation of these kinases and mitotic kinesins in a myriad of tumour types, suggesting that their inhibition could result in preferential targeting of malignant cells. Such findings make the development of these inhibitors a rational and attractive new area for cancer therapeutics. Although challenges of potency and non-specificity have hampered their progress through the clinic, several novel compounds are presently in various phases of clinical trial evaluation.

Vincristine potentiates the anti-proliferative effect of an aurora kinase inhibitor, VE-465, in myeloid leukemia cells

Aurora kinases play an essential role in the regulation of mitosis. The kinases are overexpressed in a variety of cancer cells and are involved in tumorgenesis. Although aurora kinase inhibitors are potential agents for treatment of leukemia, the establishment of efficacious combination therapies is an attractive approach for making good use of these agents. In this study, we examined the effects of a specific aurora kinase inhibitor, VE-465, in combination with various conventional anti-leukemia agents, including doxorubicin, daunorubicin, idarubicin, mitoxantron, cytosine arabinoside, vincristine and etoposide, on acute myeloid leukemia cell lines (HL60, U937, THP-1 and KY821), chronic myeloid leukemia cell lines (KCL22, K562 and KU812) and primary leukemia cells. We found that a combination of VE-465 and vincristine had a synergistic/additive inhibitory effect on the growth of leukemia cells. VE-465 initially increased G2/M-phase cells, followed by induction of sub-G1 cells. Vincristine enhanced this effect of VE-465. The combination of VE-465 and vincristine increased the levels of cleaved caspase 3, cleaved caspase 7, cleaved caspase 9, cleaved PARP and Phospho-Chk2, suggesting that the combination caused Chk2-mediated activation of the G2/M checkpoint, resulting in sequential induction of apoptosis. Interestingly, the combination markedly decreased the level of Phospho-ERK1/2, suggesting that the combination alters a network of cellular signaling pathways. In contrast, combinations of VE-465 and other agents showed no synergistic inhibitory effect but rather had an antagonistic effect. In conclusion, our results indicate the utility of the combination of VE-465 and vincristine as a potential therapy for myeloid leukemia.

Aurora kinases are expressed in medullary thyroid carcinoma (MTC) and their inhibition suppresses in vitro growth and tumorigenicity of the MTC derived cell line TT

Background

The Aurora kinase family members, Aurora-A, -B and -C, are involved in the regulation of mitosis, and alterations in their expression are associated with cell malignant transformation. To date no information on the expression of these proteins in medullary thyroid carcinoma (MTC) are available. We here investigated the expression of the Aurora kinases in human MTC tissues and their potential use as therapeutic targets.

Methods

The expression of the Aurora kinases in 26 MTC tissues at different TNM stages was analyzed at the mRNA level by quantitative RT-PCR. We then evaluated the effects of the Aurora kinase inhibitor MK-0457 on the MTC derived TT cell line proliferation, apoptosis, soft agar colony formation, cell cycle and ploidy.

Results

The results showed the absence of correlation between tumor tissue levels of any Aurora kinase and tumor stage indicating the lack of prognostic value for these proteins. Treatment with MK-0457 inhibited TT cell proliferation in a time- and dose-dependent manner with IC₅₀ = 49.8 ± 6.6 nM, as well as Aurora kinases phosphorylation of substrates relevant to the mitotic progression. Time-lapse experiments demonstrated that MK-0457-treated cells entered mitosis but were unable to complete it. Cytofluorimetric analysis confirmed that MK-0457 induced accumulation of cells with ≥ 4N DNA content without inducing apoptosis. Finally, MK-0457 prevented the capability of the TT cells to form colonies in soft agar.

Conclusions

We demonstrate that Aurora kinases inhibition hampered growth and tumorigenicity of TT cells, suggesting its potential therapeutic value for MTC treatment.

Nuclear overexpression of mitotic regulatory proteins in biliary tract cancer: correlation with clinicopathologic features and patient survival

Mitosis dysregulation is common in cancers. This study explored the nuclear expression patterns and prognostic significance of mitotic regulatory proteins, including Aurora kinases, survivin, and p53, in biliary tract cancer (BTC). Archival tumor samples from 161 BTC patients who underwent surgery were tested for the expression of Aurora-A, Aurora-B, survivin, and p53 by immunohistochemistry. The potential endogeneity among the clinicopathologic variables and survival outcome was assessed by a generalized simultaneous equations model. Nuclear overexpression of Aurora-A, Aurora-B, survivin, and p53 was found in 79 (49.1%), 45 (28.0%), 55 (34.2%), and 55 (34.2%) patients, respectively. Intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma, compared with the other two subtypes, had significantly higher proportions of nuclear overexpression of Aurora-B and survivin (37.8% and 47.3%, respectively). Simultaneous overexpression of Aurora-A and Aurora-B was correlated with that of p53. Overexpression of Aurora-B was also correlated with that of survivin and tumor grade. Our data indicate that simultaneous overexpression of Aurora-A and Aurora-B, suggesting dysregulated mitosis is associated with worse survival in patients with BTC. Independent prognostic factors for poor overall survival included simultaneous overexpression of Aurora-A and Aurora-B (hazard ratio, 1.997; 95% confidence interval, 1.239-3.219; P = 0.0045) and tumor grade (hazard ratio, 2.117; 95% confidence interval, 1.339-3.348; P = 0.0013) assessed by a multivariate analysis stratified by American Joint Committee on Cancer stage and p53 overexpression. Endogeneity testing suggested that nuclear overexpression of p53 and tumor type may influence patient survival through their interactions with Aurora-A/Aurora-B expression and tumor grade.

A support vector machine classifier for recognizing mitotic subphases using high-content screening data

High-content screening studies of mitotic checkpoints are important for identifying cancer targets and developing novel cancer-specific therapies. A crucial step in such a study is to determine the stage of cell cycle. Due to the overwhelming number of cells assayed in a high-content screening experiment and the multiple factors that need to be taken into consideration for accurate determination of mitotic subphases, an automated classifier is necessary. In this article, the authors describe in detail a support vector machine (SVM) classifier that they have implemented to recognize various mitotic subphases. In contrast to previous studies to recognize subcellular patterns, they used only low-resolution cell images and a few parameters that can be calculated inexpensively with off-the-shelf image-processing software. The performance of the SVM was evaluated with a cross-validation method and was shown to be comparable to that of a human expert.

Phospho-regulation of human protein kinase Aurora-A: analysis using anti-phospho-Thr288 monoclonal antibodies

Mammalian Aurora-A is related to a serine/threonine protein kinase that was originally identified by its close homology with Saccharomyces cerevisiae Ipl1p and Drosophila melanogaster aurora that are key regulators in the orchestration of mitotic events. The protein level of Aurora-A, its peak kinase activity during mitosis, and its activation have been attributed to phosphorylation. Here we show that this enzyme is an arginine-directed kinase and define its substrate specificity. We also found that Thr288 within the activation loop is a critical residue for activating phosphorylation events in vitro and that it is spatiotemporally restricted to a brief window at mitosis on duplicated centrosomes and on spindle microtubules proximal to the poles in vivo. Immunodepletion assays indicated that an upstream kinase(s) of Aurora-A might exist in mammalian cells in addition to autophosphorylation. Furthermore, human activated Aurora-A forms complexes with the negative regulator protein serine/threonine phosphatase type 1 (PP1) that was negatively phosphorylated on Thr320. Interestingly, phospho-specific Aurora-A monoclonal antibodies restrain Aurora-A kinase activity in vitro, providing further therapeutic avenues to explore.

Aurora kinases, aneuploidy and cancer, a coincidence or a real link?

As Aurora kinases are overexpressed in a large number of cancers, and ectopic expression of Aurora generates polyploid cells containing multiple centrosomes, it has been tempting to suggest that Aurora overexpression provokes genetic instability underlying the tumorigenesis. However, examination of the evidence suggests a more complex relationship. Overexpression of Aurora-A readily transforms rat-1 and NIH3T3 cells, but not primary cells, whereas overexpression of Aurora-B induces metastasis after implantation of tumors in nude mice. Why do polyploid cells containing abnormal centrosome numbers induced by Aurora not get eliminated at cell-cycle checkpoints? Does this phenotype determine the origin of cancer or does it only promote tumor progression? Would drugs against Aurora family members be of any help for cancer treatment? These and related questions are addressed in this review (which is part of the Chromosome Segregation and Aneuploidy series).

Aurora kinases: shining lights on the therapeutic horizon?

The Aurora kinases have been implicated in tumorigenesis and are important regulators of diverse cell cycle events, ranging from the entry into mitosis, centrosome function, mitotic spindle formation, chromosome biorientation and segregation, and cytokinesis. The recent identification of novel binding partners and key downstream effectors, together with new small-molecule inhibitors that display efficacy against tumours, heralds an upsurge of interest in these critical kinases. This review details new developments in the field and analyses the potential of Aurora kinases as anticancer targets.

Mechanism of Aurora B activation by INCENP and inhibition by hesperadin

Aurora family serine/threonine kinases control mitotic progression, and their deregulation is implicated in tumorigenesis. Aurora A and Aurora B, the best-characterized members of mammalian Aurora kinases, are approximately 60% identical but bind to unrelated activating subunits. The structure of the complex of Aurora A with the TPX2 activator has been reported previously. Here, we report the crystal structure of Aurora B in complex with the IN-box segment of the inner centromere protein (INCENP) activator and with the small molecule inhibitor Hesperadin. The Aurora B:INCENP complex is remarkably different from the Aurora A:TPX2 complex. INCENP forms a crown around the small lobe of Aurora B and induces the active conformation of the T loop allosterically. The structure represents an intermediate state of activation of Aurora B in which the Aurora B C-terminal segment stabilizes an open conformation of the catalytic cleft, and a critical ion pair in the kinase active site is impaired. Phosphorylation of two serines in the carboxyl terminus of INCENP generates the fully active kinase.

Overexpression of Aurora-A contributes to malignant development of human esophageal squamous cell carcinoma

PURPOSE

Aurora-A/STK15/BTAK, a centrosome-associated oncogenic protein, is implicated in the control of mitosis. Overexpression of Aurora-A has been shown to result in chromosomal aberration and genomic instability. Multiple lines of evidence indicate that Aurora-A induces cell malignant transformation. In the current study, we are interested in investigating the expression of Aurora-A in human esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) and characterizing the association of Aurora-A with ESCCmalignant progression.

EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN

Aurora-A protein expression was examined in 84 ESCC tissues and 81 paired normal adjacent tissues by either immunohistochemistry or Western blot analysis. In addition, a gene-knockdown small interfering RNA technique was used in ESCC cells to investigate whether Aurora-A contributes to the ability of a tumor to grow invasively.

RESULTS

The amount of Aurora-A protein in ESCC was considerably higher than that in normal adjacent tissues. Overexpression of Aurora-A was observed in 57 of 84 (67.5%) ESCC samples. In contrast, <2% of normal adjacent tissue displayed high expression of Aurora-A. Interestingly, overexpression of Aurora-A seemed to correlate with the invasive malignancy of ESCC. Disruption of endogenous Aurora-A using small interfering RNA technique substantially suppressed cell migrating ability.

CONCLUSION

The findings presented in this report show that Aurora-A expression is elevated in human esophageal squamous cell carcinoma and is possibly associated with tumor invasion, indicating that overexpression of Aurora-A may contribute to ESCC occurrence and progression.

Characterization of gene expression in mucinous cystic neoplasms of the pancreas using oligonucleotide microarrays

Mucinous cystic neoplasms (MCNs) of the pancreas are uncommon neoplasms usually located in the body or tail of the pancreas and usually in females (>90% of cases). Clinically, they are often misdiagnosed as non-neoplastic pseudocysts leading to failed opportunities for curative resection. To better understand the biology of MCNs and to identify markers of the disease, we performed global gene expression profiling of MCNs using oligonucleotide microarrays. Using laser capture microdissection applied to frozen sections, RNA was extracted from the neoplastic epithelium of MCNs, from the adjacent 'ovarian-type' stroma of MCNs, from histologically normal pancreatic ductal epithelium, from pancreatic acinar tissue and from fibrous stroma in pancreata affected by chronic pancreatitis. Each RNA sample was subjected to two rounds of linear amplification followed by hybridization with U133A gene chips (Affymetrix). The expression patterns of selected genes were confirmed by quantitative RT-PCR and by immunohistochemistry using tissue microarrays containing 19 resected MCNs. A total of 114 known genes were overexpressed in the neoplastic epithelium compared to normal pancreatic ductal epithelium (>3-fold) including S100P, PSCA, c-myc, STK6/STK15, cathepsin E and pepsinogen C. Activation of the Notch pathway in the epithelial component of MCNs was evident by the demonstration of overexpression of Jagged1 and the downstream Notch pathway member Hes1. In the 'ovarian-type' stroma, several genes involved in estrogen metabolism were overexpressed including STAR and ESR1 genes. Some of the genes identified as overexpressed in these neoplasms may be useful as markers that can distinguish MCNs from non-neoplastic pancreatic cystic lesions.