Correspondence 1: Cancer vaccines: pessimism in check

Therapeutic Cancer Vaccination with Ex Vivo RNA-Transfected Dendritic Cells-An Update

Over the last two decades, dendritic cell (DC) vaccination has been studied extensively as active immunotherapy in cancer treatment and has been proven safe in all clinical trials both with respect to short and long-term side effects. For antigen-loading of dendritic cells (DCs) one method is to introduce mRNA coding for the desired antigens. To target the whole antigenic repertoire of a tumor, even the total tumor mRNA of a macrodissected biopsy sample can be used. To date, reports have been published on a total of 781 patients suffering from different tumor entities and HIV-infection, who have been treated with DCs loaded with mRNA. The majority of those were melanoma patients, followed by HIV-infected patients, but leukemias, brain tumors, prostate cancer, renal cell carcinomas, pancreatic cancers and several others have also been treated. Next to antigen-loading, mRNA-electroporation allows a purposeful manipulation of the DCs’ phenotype and function to enhance their immunogenicity. In this review, we intend to give a comprehensive summary of what has been published regarding clinical testing of ex vivo generated mRNA-transfected DCs, with respect to safety and risk/benefit evaluations, choice of tumor antigens and RNA-source, and the design of better DCs for vaccination by transfection of mRNA-encoded functional proteins.

Correlates of immune and clinical activity of novel cancer vaccines

Cancer vaccines are solely meant to amplify the pool of type 1 cytokine oriented CD4+ and CD8+ T cells that recognize tumor antigen and ultimately foster control and destruction of a growing tumor. They are not designed to deal with all aspects of immune ignorance, exclusion, suppression and escape that are generally in place in patients with cancer and may prevent the T cells to enter the tumor or to exert their effector function. This simple fact prompted for a reappraisal of the many recent trials in which therapeutic cancer vaccines have been examined as monotherapy. In this review, I focus on trials examining therapeutic cancer vaccines at different stages of existing disease. The analysis of vaccine-induced immune responses and clinical activity of therapeutic cancer vaccines revealed four levels of evidence for vaccine efficacy. The lowest levels, reflect the many trials in which the strength of the tumor-reactive T cell response of vaccinated patients is associated with better clinical outcome or change in tumor marker. The highest levels indicate occasional regressions of tumors and metastases after vaccination or reflect a stronger clinical impact of vaccine in a randomized trial. A whole series of trials in which vaccine-induced tumor immunity correlates with the clinical impact of cancer vaccines in premalignant diseases, settings of low tumor burden or tumor regressions in patients with cancer, form an attest to the fact that cancer vaccines work. While the current number of true clinical responders in each cancer trial is too low for firm conclusions on immune correlates of clinical reactivity in cancer, extrapolation of the results from vaccinated patients with pre-cancers suggest a requirement of broad type 1 T cell reactivity.

Validity of combination active specific immunotherapy for colorectal cancer: a meta-analysis of 2993 patients

BACKGROUND AIMS

The aim of this study was to investigate whether active specific immunotherapy (ASI) is able to demonstrate therapeutic efficacy against colorectal cancer.

METHODS

We conducted a systematic review of published papers from MEDLINE, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, EMBASE, the Wanfang Database, the China Science and Technology Periodical Database and China Journal Net. Published data were extracted independently by two authors who used predefined database templates. The effects of ASI were compared with those of surgery alone, and a pooled analysis was performed with the use of the data from random- or fixed-effect models.

RESULTS

Twelve trials matched our inclusion criteria (n = 2993, including 1842 control subjects). The overall analysis showed a significant survival benefit [1-, 2-, 3-, 4-, 5-, 6- and 7-year overall survival (OS), P < 0.05; 10-year OS, P < 0.001] in favor of ASI immunotherapy combined with surgery, but there was not an improvement in the 8- or 9-year OS (P > 0.05). The disease-free survival (DFS) rate was improved after the combination of ASI immunotherapy (2-, 3-, 5- and 10-year DFS, P < 0.05), but no significant improvement was noted for the 1-, 4-, 6-, 7-, 8- or 9-year DFS (P > 0.05). In addition, the disease-specific survival (DSS) was improved at some time points after the combination of ASI immunotherapy and surgery (2-, 3-, 4-, 5- and 6-year DSS, P < 0.05, but not the 1-, 7-, 8- or 9-year DSS, P > 0.05). An improved 2-, 3-, 4-, 5- and 6-year recurrence-free interval (RFI) (P < 0.05) was also observed in patients who received ASI therapy, but this was not observed for the 1-year RFI (P > 0.05). Furthermore, an analysis of the recurrence-free survival (RFS) showed that it was significantly increased in the ASI plus surgery group (1-, 2-, 3-, 4-, 5- and 6-year RFS, P < 0.001). The funnel plots showed that the analyses were relatively reliable and the publication bias was small.

CONCLUSIONS

The combination of ASI immunotherapy and surgery was superior in prolonging the overall survival time and enhancing the recurrence-free survival rate compared with surgery alone.

Reflections upon human cancer immune responsiveness to T cell-based therapy

Immune-mediated rejection of human cancer is a relatively rare but well-documented phenomenon. Its rate of occurrence progressively increases from the occasional observation of spontaneous regressions to the high rate of complete remissions observed in response to effective treatments. For two decades, our group has focused its interest in understanding this phenomenon by studying humans following an inductive approach. Sticking to a sequential logic, we dissected the phenomenon by studying to the best of our capability both peripheral and tumor samples and reached the conclusion that immune-mediated cancer rejection is a facet of autoimmunity where the target tissue is the cancer itself. As we are currently defining the strategy to effectively identify the mechanisms leading in individual patients to rejection of their own tumors, we considered useful to summarize the thought process that guided us to our own interpretation of the mechanisms of immune responsiveness.

Clinical outcomes of active specific immunotherapy in advanced colorectal cancer and suspected minimal residual colorectal cancer: a meta-analysis and system review

BACKGROUND

To evaluate the objective clinical outcomes of active specific immunotherapy (ASI) in advanced colorectal cancer (advanced CRC) and suspected minimal residual colorectal cancer (suspected minimal residual CRC).

METHODS

A search was conducted on Medline and Pub Med from January 1998 to January 2010 for original studies on ASI in colorectal cancer (CRC). All articles included in this study were assessed with the application of predetermined selection criteria and were divided into two groups: ASI in advanced CRC and ASI in suspected minimal residual CRC. For ASI in suspected minimal residual CRC, a meta-analysis was executed with results regarding the overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS). Regarding ASI in advanced colorectal cancer, a system review was performed with clinical outcomes.

RESULTS

1375 colorectal carcinoma patients with minimal residual disease have been enrolled in Meta-analysis. A significantly improved OS and DFS was noted for suspected minimal residual CRC patients utilizing ASI (For OS: HR = 0.76, P = 0.007; For DFS: HR = 0.76, P = 0.03). For ASI in stage II suspected minimal residual CRC, OS approached significance when compared with control (HR = 0.71, P = 0.09); however, the difference in DFS of ASI for the stage II suspected minimal residual CRC reached statistical significance (HR = 0.66, P = 0.02). For ASI in stage III suspected minimal residual CRC compared with control, The difference in both OS and DFS achieved statistical significance (For OS: HR = 0.76, P = 0.02; For DFS: HR = 0.81, P = 0.03). 656 advanced colorectal patients have been evaluated on ASI in advanced CRC. Eleven for CRs and PRs was reported, corresponding to an overall response rate of 1.68%. No serious adverse events have been observed in 2031 patients.

CONCLUSIONS

It is unlikely that ASI will provide a standard complementary therapeutic approach for advanced CRC in the near future. However, the clinical responses to ASI in patients with suspected minimal residual CRC have been encouraging, and it has become clear that immunotherapy works best in situations of patients with suspected minimal residual CRC.

Analysis of vaccine-induced T cells in humans with cancer

Over the past several years, progress in the field of tumor immunology has lead to advances in active immunotherapy and vaccination as a means ofeliciting tumor-specific immune responses to mediate tumor regression and clearance. Developing vaccines targeted against cancer became an important focus as a therapy following the success of viral vaccines in preventing infection and disease. In humans with cancer, similar to viral infections, the host immune system is capable of recognizing antigens expressed on tumor cells. This similarity allows the immunological framework of the viral vaccine to be adapted to the cancer setting in hopes of enhancing human T-cell reactivity against tumor. It is generally believed that a requirement for tumor destruction to occur is the induction of sufficient levels of immune cells with high avidity for recognition of tumor antigens. Moreover, the cells must be targeted to the tumor site and be capable of infiltrating tumor stroma.2 Several tumor-associated antigens (TAA) have been identified in the melanoma model which has allowed for immunization trials to evaluate therapeutic potential of tumor-specific T-cell induction. Some clinical trials reported limited success ofT-cell mediated tumor rejection, reportingpartial or complete regression in 10 to 30% of patients. Although tumor regression was not observed following active immunization in vivo, ex vivo assays evaluating TAA-specific T cells demonstrated tumor recognition and subsequent T-cell activation suggesting that tumor-specific T-cell induction indeed occurs but alone is not adequate to induce tumor regression. Recently, the usefulness and success of active-specific immunization (ASI) against TAAs as a means ofeliciting a tumor-specific immune response leading to tumor regression and clearance has been a topic of debate and discussion.

Clinical applications of a peptide-based vaccine for glioblastoma

Glioblastoma multiforme is a malignant, relentless brain cancer with no known cure, and standard therapies leave significant room for the development of better, more effective treatments. Immunotherapy is a promising approach to the treatment of solid tumors that directs the patient's own immune system to destroy tumor cells. The most successful immunologically based cancer therapy to date involves the passive administration of monoclonal antibodies, but significant antitumor responses have also been generated with active vaccination strategies and cell-transfer therapies. This article summarizes the important components of the immune system, discusses the specific difficulty of immunologic privilege in the central nervous system, and reviews treatment approaches that are being attempted, with an emphasis on active immunotherapy using peptide vaccines.

EGFRvIII-targeted vaccination therapy of malignant glioma

Given the highly infiltrative growth pattern of malignant glioma and the lack of specificity associated with currently available treatment regimens, alternative strategies designed to eradicate cancer cells while limiting collateral toxicity in normal tissues remain a high priority. To this end, the development of specific immunotherapies against targeted neoplastic cells represents a promising approach. The epidermal growth factor receptor class III variant (EGFRvIII), a constitutively activated mutant of the wild-type tyrosine kinase, is present in a substantial proportion of malignant gliomas and other human cancers, yet completely absent from normal tissues. This receptor variant consists of an in-frame deletion, the translation of which produces an extracellular junction with a novel glycine residue, flanked by amino acid sequences that are not typically adjacent in the normal protein. In this review, both preclinical and early clinical development of a peptide vaccine directed against this portion of the EGFRvIII antigenic domain are recapitulated. Following vaccination, our group has demonstrated potent, redirected cellular and humoral immunity against cancer cells expressing the mutant receptor without significant toxicity. Additionally, the corresponding therapeutic outcomes observed in these studies lend credence to the potential role of peptide-based vaccination strategies among emerging antitumor immunotherapies in patients with malignant glioma.

Progress and challenges in the vaccine-based treatment of head and neck cancers

Head and neck (HN) cancer represents one of the most challenging diseases because the mortality remains high despite advances in early diagnosis and treatment. Although vaccine-based approaches for the treatment of advanced squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck have achieved limited clinical success, advances in cancer immunology provide a strong foundation and powerful new tools to guide current attempts to develop effective cancer vaccines. This article reviews what has to be rather what has been done in the field for the development of future vaccines in HN tumours.

Anaplastic lymphoma kinase: an oncogene for tumor vaccination

The immune system contributes both to the maintenance of cancer in an equilibrium state and to the elimination of tumor cells. Specific antitumor vaccination could increase the intensity or modulate the quality of this immune response against transformed cells. Antitumor vaccination strategies rely upon the identification of one or multiple antigens that can serve to stimulate the immune system. This review will focus particularly on cancer vaccination strategies based on the use of DNA molecules and on the search for antigens that are required for the growth of tumor cells and that cannot be easily down-regulated by the cancer cells (oncoantigens). In addition, we will summarize some results on clinical trials that are currently exploiting selected antigens against tumors and on the recently identified anaplastic lymphoma kinase as a potential oncoantigen for selected types of human cancers.

Lectin of Concanavalin A as an anti-hepatoma therapeutic agent

Liver cancer is the predominant cause of cancer mortality in males of Southern China and Taiwan. The current therapy is not satisfactory, and more effective treatments are needed. In the search for new therapies for liver tumor, we found that Concanavalin A (Con A), a lectin from Jack bean seeds, can have a potent anti-hepatoma effect. Con A after binding to the mannose moiety on the cell membrane glycoprotein is internalized preferentially to the mitochondria. An autophagy is triggered which leads to cell death. Con A as a T cell mitogen subsequently activates the immune response in the liver and results in the eradication of the tumor in a murine in situ hepatoma model. The liver tumor nodule formation is inhibited by the CD8⁺ T cells, and a tumor antigen-specific immune memory is established during the hepatic inflammation. The dual properties (autophagic cytotoxicity and immunomodulation) via the specific carbohydrate binding let Con A exert a potent anti-hepatoma therapeutic effect. The novel mechanism of the Con A anti-hepatoma effect is discussed. The prototype of Con with an anti-hepatoma activity gives support to the search for other natural lectins as anti-cancer compounds.

Therapeutics targeting tumor immune escape: towards the development of new generation anticancer vaccines

Despite the evidence that immune effectors can play a significant role in controlling tumor growth under natural conditions or in response to therapeutic manipulation, it is clear that malignant cells evade immune surveillance in most cases. Considering that anticancer vaccination has reached a plateau of results and currently no vaccination regimen is indicated as a standard anticancer therapy, the dissection of the molecular events underlying tumor immune escape is the necessary condition to make anticancer vaccines a therapeutic weapon effective enough to be implemented in the routine clinical setting. Recent years have witnessed significant advances in our understanding of the molecular mechanisms underlying tumor immune escape. These mechanistic insights are fostering the development of rationally designed therapeutics aimed at reverting the immunosuppressive circuits that undermine an effective antitumor immune response. In this review, the best characterized mechanisms that allow cancer cells to evade immune surveillance are overviewed and the most debated controversies constellating this complex field are highlighted. In addition, the latest therapeutic strategies devised to overcome tumor immune escape are described, with special regard to those entering clinical phase investigation.

Spontaneous and treatment-induced cancer rejection in humans

BACKGROUND

Experimental observations suggest that human cancer cells actively interact with normal host cells and this cross-talk results, in most instances, in an increased potential of cancer cells to survive. On the other hand, it is also well documented that on rare occasions tumors can be dramatically destroyed by the host's immune response.

OBJECTIVE

In this review, we argue that understanding the mechanisms that bring about the immune response and lead to cancer destruction is of paramount importance for the design of future rational therapies.

METHODS

Here we summarize the present understanding of the phenomenology leading to cancer regression in humans and propose novel strategies for a more efficient study of human cancer under natural conditions and during therapy.

CONCLUSION

The understanding of tumor/host interactions within the tumor microenvironment is a key component of the study of tumor immunology in humans, much can be learned by a dynamic study of such interactions at time points related to the natural history of the disease or its response to therapy. Such understanding will eventually lead to novel and more effective therapies.

Immunotherapy for gastrointestinal cancer: current status and strategies for improving efficacy

BACKGROUND

Despite improvement in conventional strategies for treating gastrointestinal (GI) carcinoma, large numbers of patients still suffer from incurable or progressive disease.

OBJECTIVE

Here we consider the prospects for circumventing limitations and maximising the efficacy of different immunotherapies.

METHODS

We summarise different cancer vaccines and targeted drugs and highlight the scientific rationale of using immunotherapy for targeting GI cancers, in addition to the potential strategies for improving immunotherapeutic efficacy.

RESULTS/CONCLUSION

Many cancer vaccines and antibody-directed therapies have been tested in early phase clinical trials and demonstrated proof of concept and safety. As yet few have been properly evaluated for clinical efficacy; although adoptive transfer of tumour-associated-antigen-specific T cells has shown dramatic clinical responses in some patients. The recognition of a role for T regulatory cells in limiting anti-tumour immunity has provided momentum for developing strategies to over-ride such immunoinhibitory effects. There is some evidence that conventional therapies may work by influencing these negative factors and allowing expression of immune control mechanisms. An important developing area for clinical evaluation is the testing of combined conventional and immunotherapeutic modalities which may provide for synergy; thereby circumventing the limitations of individualised treatments and generating additional clinical benefits.

Therapeutic cancer vaccines

Therapeutic cancer vaccines target the cellular arm of the immune system to initiate a cytotoxic T-lymphocyte response against tumor-associated antigens. Immunotherapy offers one of the few therapeutic options that reproducibly leads to a subset of patients with long-term remissions (seemingly cures) of widely metastatic disease. Therapeutic cancer vaccines tested in clinical trials have included inactivated tumor cells administered in immunological adjuvants or after genetic modification to increase their immunogenicity. Other forms are heat shock protein vaccines and anti-ganglioside antibodies. Tumor-associated antigenic peptides have been fully characterized for some cancers. Finally, strategies to directly expand antitumor T lymphocytes and adoptively transfer them to patients with cancer have been developed and shown to induce objective tumor regressions.

The CIMT-monitoring panel: a two-step approach to harmonize the enumeration of antigen-specific CD8+ T lymphocytes by structural and functional assays

The interpretation of the results obtained from immunomonitoring of clinical trials is a difficult task due to the variety of methods and protocols available to detect vaccine-specific T-cell responses. This heterogeneity as well as the lack of standards has led to significant scepticism towards published results. In February 2005, a working group was therefore founded under the aegis of the Association for Immunotherapy of Cancer ("CIMT") in order to compare techniques and protocols applied for the enumeration of antigen-specific T-cell responses. Here we present the results from two consecutive phases of an international inter-laboratory testing project referred to as the "CIMT monitoring panel". A total of 13 centers from six European countries participated in the study in which pre-tested PBMC samples, synthetic peptides and PE-conjugated HLA-tetramers were prepared centrally and distributed to participants. All were asked to determine the number of antigen-specific T-cells in each sample using tetramer staining and one functional assay. The results of the first testing round revealed that the total number of cells analyzed was the most important determinant for the sensitive detection of antigen-specific CD8(+) T-cells by tetramer staining. Analysis by ELISPOT was influenced by a combination of cell number and a resting phase after thawing of peripheral blood mononuclear cells. Therefore, the experiments were repeated in a second phase but now the participants were asked to change their protocols according to the new guidelines distilled from the results of the first phase. The recommendations improved the number of antigen-specific T-cell responses that were detected and decreased the variability between the laboratories. We conclude that a two-step approach in inter-laboratory testing allows the identification of distinct variables that influence the sensitivity of different T-cell assays and to formally show that a defined correction to the protocols successfully increases the sensitivity and reduces the inter-center variability. Such "two-step" inter-laboratory projects could define rational bases for accepted international guidelines and thereby lead to the harmonization of the techniques used for immune monitoring.

Cancer vaccines: a promising cancer therapy against all odds

Vaccination as an approach to control cancer growth and recurrence, also known as active-specific immunotherapy (ASI), has been successful at inducing immune responses, even in patients with advanced or metastatic disease. Clinical responses, as determined by the criteria set for chemotherapy and radiation, have been much more difficult to assess. In general, the effectiveness of ASI in advanced disease is expected to be limited. The lack of toxicity in thousands of vaccinated patients with many different tumor types, and clearly observed, albeit rare, efficacy, support the use of ASI in early disease following resection of the primary tumor or removal of precancerous lesions. This setting will permit a much more rational assessment of the long-term efficacy of ASI, as well as its toxicity. Given that ASI relies on a healthy immune system to be effective, it is also predicted to be more successful when it is employed prior to the use of standard chemotherapy. At the very least, it should be given primary consideration in situations where the role of cytotoxic chemotherapy is equivocal and patients are in need of a nontoxic alternative.

Recent developments in renal cell cancer immunotherapy

Various immunotherapeutic approaches for the treatment of renal cell carcinoma (RCC) have been developed for > 90 years. Existing immunotherapeutic strategies against RCC include: systemic administration of cytokines; therapeutic vaccines based on tumor cells or dendritic cells; monoclonal antibodies; and adoptive immunotherapy (T cell transfer or allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation). However, the overall efficacy of immunotherapy for advanced RCC remains moderate. With the advent of molecularly targeted biological therapies that turned out to be significantly effective in the treatment of metastatic RCC, to many oncologists immunotherapy may seem to be moving into the periphery of RCC treatment strategies. However, for the last 2 years there has been significant progress made in immunotherapeutic approaches for the treatment of RCC. Immunotherapy still remains the only systemic therapeutic strategy that is believed to potentially cure RCC patients. The development of active and passive specific immunotherapeutic approaches, along with the possibility to 'switch off' particular immunosuppressive mechanisms (e.g., elimination of regulatory T cells, blockage of cytotoxic T lymphocyte antigen-4 signaling), have paved the way for future trials of new immunotherapies of RCC. However, the new studies will have to enroll optimally selected patients (nephrectomized, with non-massive metastases and good performance status) and will use tumor response criteria that are specifically optimized for clinical trials of immunotherapy.

Concanavalin A induces autophagy in hepatoma cells and has a therapeutic effect in a murine in situ hepatoma model

Concanavalin A (ConA), a lectin with mannose specificity that can induce acute hepatic inflammation, was tested for its therapeutic effect against hepatoma. ConA is cytotoxic or inhibitory to hepatoma cells, which is mediated by the autophagic pathway through mitochondria. Once it was bound to cell membrane glycoproteins, the ConA was internalized and preferentially localized onto the mitochondria. The mitochondria membrane permeability changed, and an autophagic pathway including LC3-II generation, double-layer vesicle, BNIP3 induction, and acidic vesicular organelle formation was induced. Either 3-MA or siRNA for BNIP3 and LC3, but neither beclin-1 nor ATG 5, partially inhibited the ConA-induced cell death. In addition to the autophagy induction, ConA is known to be a T cell mitogen. Using an in situ hepatoma model, ConA can exert an anti-hepatoma therapeutic effect, inhibiting tumor nodule formation in the liver and prolonging survival.

CONCLUSION

ConA can be considered as an anti-hepatoma agent therapeutically because of its autophagic induction and immunomodulating activity. This dual function of ConA provides a novel mechanism for the biological effect of lectin.

A pilot study with a therapeutic vaccine based on hydroxyapatite ceramic particles and self-antigens in cancer patients

We describe an approach to produce an autologous therapeutic antitumor vaccine using hydroxyapatite (HA) for vaccinating cancer patients. The novel approach involved (1) the purification of part of the self-tumor antigens/ adjuvants using column chromatography with HA, (2) the employ of HA as a medium to attract antigen-presenting cells (APCs) to the vaccination site, and (3) the use of HA as a vector to present in vivo the tumor antigens and adjuvants to the patient's APCs. The vaccine was prepared using and combining HA particles, with at least 3 heat shock proteins (gp96 was one of them possibly with chaperoned proteins/peptides as shown in the slot blots) and with proteins from the cell membrane system (including Hsp70, Hsp27, and membrane proteins). The timing of HA degradation was tested in rats; the HA particles administered under the skin attracted macrophages and were degraded into smaller particles, and they were totally phagocytized within 1 week. In patients (n = 20), the vaccine was then administered weekly and showed very low toxicity, causing minor and tolerable local inflammation (erythema, papule, or local pain); only 1 patient who received a larger dose presented hot flashes, and there were no systemic manifestations of toxicity or autoimmune diseases attributed to the vaccine. Our study suggests that this therapeutic vaccine has shown some efficacy producing a positive response in certain patients. Stable disease was noted in 25% of the patients (renal carcinoma, breast carcinoma, and astrocytoma), and a partial response was noted in 15% of the patients (breast carcinoma and astrocytoma). The most encouraging results were seen in patients with recurrent disease; 4 patients in these conditions (20%) are disease free following the vaccine administration. However, we do not want to overstate the clinical efficacy in this small number of patients. The therapeutic vaccine tested in our study is working by activating the T-cell response as was shown in the comparative histological and immunohistochemical study performed in the pre- and postvaccine biopsy taken from a patient with inflammatory breast carcinoma. However, we cannot ruled out that the vaccine could also be producing an antibody(ies)-mediated response. In conclusion, this therapeutic vaccine based on HA ceramic particles and self-antigens can be safely administered and is showing some encouraging clinical results in cancer patients.

Clinical results of vaccine therapy for cancer: learning from history for improving the future

Active, specific immunotherapy for cancer holds the potential of providing an approach for treating cancers, which have not been controlled by conventional therapy, with very little or no associated toxicity. Despite advances in the understanding of the immunological basis of cancer vaccine therapy as well as technological progress, clinical effectiveness of this therapy has often been frustratingly unpredictable. Hundreds of preclinical and clinical studies have been performed addressing issues related to the generation of a therapeutic immune response against tumors and exploring a diverse array of antigens, immunological adjuvants, and delivery systems for vaccinating patients against cancer. In this chapter, we have summarized a number of clinical trials performed in various cancers with focus on the clinical outcome of vaccination therapy. We have also attempted to draw objective inferences from the published data that may influence the clinical effectiveness of vaccination approaches against cancer. Collectively the data indicate that vaccine therapy is safe, and no significant autoimmune reactions are observed even on long term follow-up. The design of clinical trials have not yet been optimized, but meaningful clinical effects have been seen in B-cell malignancies, lung, prostate, colorectal cancer, and melanoma. It is also obvious that patients with limited disease or in the adjuvant settings have benefited most from this targeted therapy approach. It is imperative that future studies focus on exploring the relationship between immune and clinical responses to establish whether immune monitoring could be a reliable surrogate marker for evaluating the clinical efficacy of cancer vaccines.

Peptide-based vaccination for colorectal cancer

Recently, the number of patients with colorectal cancer has been increasing. Although most patients with early colorectal cancer have a good prognosis, in the case of recurrent or metastatic disease, the prognosis is poor and most patients will ultimately die of cancer. Furthermore, the conventional treatment, such as chemotherapy or radiation therapy, occasionally can not be continued due to reasons of toxicity and/or poor response. Therefore, novel therapeutic optional approaches based on immunotherapy are being explored at present. This review describes and sums up the principles and the longstanding problems of peptide vaccine therapy, and demonstrates the results of clinical trials with colorectal cancer peptide vaccine therapy, including the authors' personal appraisal. In conclusion, the future prospects of peptide vaccine therapy are described.

Clinical and immunologic responses to active specific cancer vaccines in human colorectal cancer

Colorectal cancer is a common malignant disease, which, despite some progress, still requires improved therapeutic options. Several clinical studies have used active specific immunotherapy (i.e., vaccination) in colorectal cancer. However, the literature still lacks a comprehensive meta-analysis of this approach in advanced colorectal cancer. We did a systematic review with a meta-analysis of clinical studies to evaluate the objective clinical and immunologic response to active specific immunotherapy in patients with colorectal cancer. We conducted a search of Medline and the Web of Science, manually reviewed the literature, and consulted with experts. Criteria for including studies were colorectal cancer patients, active specific immunotherapy to induce a response directed against cancer or cancer antigens, an evaluable tumor burden (i.e., advanced or metastatic colorectal cancer), and precise classification of the patient, disease, and response. Response rates were assessed according to WHO criteria. Primary end points were the objective clinical response rate and the rate of immunologic responses. The secondary end point was the distribution of immune and clinical responses in relation to the route of vaccination and the type of vaccine. Thirty-two phase I/II studies reporting on 527 patients with advanced or metastatic colorectal cancer met all inclusion criteria. Pooled analysis showed an overall response rate (complete response + partial response) of 0.9% for advanced/metastatic colorectal cancer patients who underwent active specific immunization with a broad variety of substances (e.g., autologous tumor cells, peptide vaccine, dendritic cells, idiotypic antibody, and virus-based vaccine). Humoral immune responses were reported in 59%, and cellular ones were reported in 44% of the cases. Mixed or minor responses and disease stabilization are described in 1.9% and 8.3% of colorectal cancer patients, respectively. Pooled results of clinical trials reveal a very weak clinical response rate of <1% for active specific immunization procedures currently available for advanced colorectal cancer. Immune response induction is described in approximately half the patients.

Immunotherapy and immunoprevention of cancer: where do we stand?

Although evolution has shaped the immune system to control microbial invasions, this does not necessarily mean that the immune system can not be triggered to eliminate tumour cells. The exploitation of the terrific potential of the immune system to recognise cell alterations and to selectively destroy large populations of neoplastic cells is a possibility made even more attractive by the advances in our understanding of the immune mechanisms and our ability to manipulate them. This review summarises the state of the different immunotherapy strategies available or in development today, and examines the future developments that hold out the promise of an effective control of cancer growth.

Culture of melanoma cells in 3-dimensional architectures results in impaired immunorecognition by cytotoxic T lymphocytes specific for Melan-A/MART-1 tumor-associated antigen

OBJECTIVE

To assess the effects of the culture of melanoma cells in 3-dimensional (3D) architectures on their immunorecognition by cytotoxic T lymphocytes (CTLs) specific for tumor-associated antigens.

SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA

Growth in 3D architectures has been shown to promote the resistance of cancers to treatment with drugs, cytokines, or irradiation, thereby potentially playing an important role in tumor expansion. We investigated the effects of 3D culture on the recognition of melanoma cells by antigen-specific HLA class I-restricted CTLs.

METHODS

Culture of HBL melanoma cells expressing Melan-A/Mart-1 tumor-associated antigen and HLA-A0201 on poly-2-hydroxyethyl methacrylate (polyHEMA)-coated plates resulted in the generation of aggregates of 400- to 500-microm diameters containing on average 30,000 cells and characterized by slower proliferation, as compared with monolayer (2-dimensional) cultures. HLA-A0201 restricted Melan-A/Mart-127-35-specific CTL clones were used to evaluate tumor cell immunorecognition measured as specific IFN-gamma production. Comparative gene and protein expression in 2D and 3D cultures was studied by real-time PCR and flow cytometry, respectively. Overall differences in gene expression profiles between 2D and 3D cultures were evaluated by high-density oligonucleotide array hybridization.

RESULTS

HLA-A0201 restricted Melan-A/Mart-127-35 specific CTL clones produced high amounts of IFN-gamma upon short-term (4-24 hours) coincubation with HBL cells cultured in 2D but not in 3D, thus suggesting altered antigen recognition. Indeed, Melan-A/Mart-1 expression, at both gene and protein levels, was significantly decreased in 3D as compared with 2D cultures. Concomitantly, a parallel decrease of HLA class I molecule expression was also observed. Differential gene profiling studies on HBL cells showed an increased expression of genes encoding molecules involved in intercellular adhesion, such as junctional adhesion molecule 2 and cadherin-like 1 (>20- and 8-fold up-regulated, respectively) in 3D as compared with 2D cultures.

CONCLUSIONS

Taken together, our data suggest that mere growth of melanoma cells in 3D architectures, in the absence of immunoselective pressure, may result in defective recognition by tumor-associated antigen-specific CTL.

HLA-restricted specific tumor cytolysis by autologous T-lymphocytes infiltrating metastatic bone malignant fibrous histiocytoma of lymph node

Malignant fibrous histiocytoma (MFH) of the bone is a high-grade sarcoma characterized histologically by the composition of fibroblasts and pleomorphic cells with a prominent storiform pattern. Despite institution of multi-modality treatments, the prognosis for patients with this tumor remains unsatisfactory. In the present study, towards the goal of developing active immunotherapy for those affected, we established four cell lines from a 53-year-old woman who suffered from MFH of the humerus with lymph node metastases. MFH2003 and MFH2003-B7.1 were the primary lesion-derived cell line and its B7.1-transfectant, respectively. B2003-EBV and TIL2003 were a B cell line established from peripheral blood lymphocytes and a T cell line established from tumor-invaded lymph nodes, respectively. MFH2003 cells could be maintained over a period of 1 year in vitro, and could be xenotransplanted into nude mice. The phenotype of cells analyzed by immunostaining was similar to the original tumor. TIL2003 cells were all CD8+ and specifically recognized MFH2003 cells and MFH2003-B7.1 cells, but not B2003-EBV cells. An anti-HLA-class I monoclonal antibody completely blocked the anti-MFH2003 response of TILs2003. These findings indicate the existence of an anti-MFH specific immune response in the microenvironment of metastatic lymph nodes. The present autologous cell lines provide the basis for identification of novel tumor-associated antigens and may be helpful in the establishment of immunotherapy for patients with MFH of the bone.

Recent developments in therapeutic cancer vaccines

Therapeutic cancer vaccines are being developed with the intention of treating existing tumors or preventing tumor recurrence. While the results of clinical trials, predominantly in the metastatic setting have been sobering, the central hypothesis of active immunotherapy i.e. that the human immune system can be activated to recognize and destroy tumor cells, remains a viable one. We believe that a fundamental shift in how clinical trials are performed, and what concepts they test is required to make meaningful strides towards future clinical use of cancer vaccines. First, we must reappraise whether the metastatic setting is the appropriate arena to test these agents. Second, we must arrive at a consensus on the most important biologic endpoints and rapidly test vaccines for their ability to achieve these endpoints. Third, we need to expend more effort on understanding how to manipulate the immune system beyond the initial stimulation provided by a vaccine. Fourth, in order to permit comparison of results across different studies, it would be helpful to narrow down the large number of vaccine platforms. We will discuss the current state of development of cancer vaccines and the relevance for future clinical use of these agents to treat and prevent cancers.

Gene profiling of immune responses against tumors

Clinical trials of tumor-antigen-specific immunization have clearly shown that immune-mediated tumor rejection requires more than simple T cell-target cell interactions. In vivo generation of tumor-specific T cells is one of a series of steps necessary for the induction of clinically relevant immune responses. In recent years, high-throughput functional genomics exposed the complexity of tumor immune biology, which underlies the kaleidoscopic array of variables associated with cancer instability and immunogenetic variability in humans. In the quest to understand immune rejection, hypothesis-driven approaches have failed to take into account the intricacy of human pathology by relying mostly on hypotheses derived from experimental models rather than direct clinical observation. Future investigations should reframe scientific thinking when applied to humans, utilizing descriptive tools to generate novel hypotheses relevant to human disease.

Prime-boost vaccination with plasmid and adenovirus gene vaccines control HER2/neu+ metastatic breast cancer in mice

INTRODUCTION

Once metastasis has occurred, the possibility of completely curing breast cancer is unlikely, particularly for the 30 to 40% of cancers overexpressing the gene for HER2/neu. A vaccine targeting p185, the protein product of the HER2/neu gene, could have therapeutic application by controlling the growth and metastasis of highly aggressive HER2/neu+ cells. The purpose of this study was to determine the effectiveness of two gene vaccines targeting HER2/neu in preventive and therapeutic tumor models.

METHODS

The mouse breast cancer cell line A2L2, which expresses the gene for rat HER2/neu and hence p185, was injected into the mammary fat pad of mice as a model of solid tumor growth or was injected intravenously as a model of lung metastasis. SINCP-neu, a plasmid containing Sindbis virus genes and the gene for rat HER2/neu, and Adeno-neu, an E1,E2a-deleted adenovirus also containing the gene for rat HER2/neu, were tested as preventive and therapeutic vaccines.

RESULTS

Vaccination with SINCP-neu or Adeno-neu before tumor challenge with A2L2 cells significantly inhibited the growth of the cells injected into the mammary fat or intravenously. Vaccination 2 days after tumor challenge with either vaccine was ineffective in both tumor models. However, therapeutic vaccination in a prime-boost protocol with SINCP-neu followed by Adeno-neu significantly prolonged the overall survival rate of mice injected intravenously with the tumor cells. Naive mice vaccinated using the same prime-boost protocol demonstrated a strong serum immunoglobulin G response and p185-specific cellular immunity, as shown by the results of ELISPOT (enzyme-linked immunospot) analysis for IFNgamma.

CONCLUSION

We report herein that vaccination of mice with a plasmid gene vaccine and an adenovirus gene vaccine, each containing the gene for HER2/neu, prevented growth of a HER2/neu-expressing breast cancer cell line injected into the mammary fat pad or intravenously. Sequential administration of the vaccines in a prime-boost protocol was therapeutically effective when tumor cells were injected intravenously before the vaccination. The vaccines induced high levels of both cellular and humoral immunity as determined by in vitro assessment. These findings indicate that clinical evaluation of these vaccines, particularly when used sequentially in a prime-boost protocol, is justified.

A balanced review of the status T cell-based therapy against cancer

A recent commentary stirred intense controversy over the status of anti-cancer immunotherapy. The commentary suggested moving beyond current anti-cancer vaccines since active-specific immunization failed to match expectations toward a more aggressive approach involving the adoptive transfer of in vitro expanded tumor antigen-specific T cells. Although the same authors clarified their position in response to others' rebuttal more discussion needs to be devoted to the current status of T cell-based anti-cancer therapy. The accompanying publications review the status of adoptive transfer of cancer vaccines on one hand and active-specific immunization on the other. Hopefully, reading these articles will offer a balanced view of the current status of antigen-specific ant-cancer therapies and suggest future strategies to foster unified efforts to complement either approach with the other according to specific biological principles.