Asymptomatic mitral regurgitation: does surgery save lives?

Degenerative Mitral Valve Repair Restores Life Expectancy

BACKGROUND

Mitral valve repair (MVr) for severe, degenerative mitral regurgitation is the gold standard, because medical management carries poor prognosis. However, despite clear benefit of MVr, many eligible patients are untreated. This study investigated whether MVr restores patients to normal life expectancy, at any age of operation, by comparing long-term survival of patients after MVr with the life expectancy of the general United States population.

METHODS

This retrospective study investigated 1011 patients with degenerative mitral regurgitation who underwent isolated MVr between 2003 and 2017. Parametric distribution analysis was applied to long-term post-MVr mortality data, and Weibull probability plots provided the best-fit distribution by Anderson-Darling Goodness-of-Fit testing. Confidence intervals of the estimated distribution were used to compare additional life expectancy after MVr to the general US population across multiple decades of life. Patients after MVr were categorized by age into decade (range, 20-89 years).

RESULTS

The life expectancy of patients after MVr matched the life expectancy of the general US population at any age between 40 and 89 years. Lower-bound one-sided 95% confidence intervals for additional life expectancy were not appreciably different from corresponding median additional life expectancy of the general population. There were few deaths in the 20- to 39-year-old group, limiting predictability, but survival also appeared normative.

CONCLUSIONS

These findings suggest that degenerative MVr restores anticipated life expectancy to that of the general population, regardless of age. Although our findings underscore the importance of repair for degenerative mitral disease, larger studies with longer term follow-up are needed to reinforce this finding, particularly for younger patients.

Should pre-operative left atrial volume receive more consideration in patients with degenerative mitral valve disease undergoing mitral valve surgery?

BACKGROUND

Severe primary mitral regurgitation (MR) carries a significant incidence of mortality and morbidity. Though a number of prognostic factors have been identified, the best timing for mitral valve repair is still debated. We assessed the role of Left Atrial Volume Indexed (LAVI) as predictor of adverse events after mitral valve surgery.

METHODS

134 patients with severe MR were studied with a follow-up of 42±16months. Endpoints were Post-Operative Atrial Fibrillation (POAF), atrial and ventricular remodeling (LARR/LVRR) and correlation with outcome. POAF was defined as AF occurring within 2weeks and late AF (LAF) more than 2weeks after surgery. LARR was defined as LAVI reduction ≥15% and LVRR as any reduction of ventricular mass after surgery.

RESULTS

Forty-one patients experienced POAF, 26 had LAF. Pre-operative LAVI was an independent risk factor for POAF (OR 1.03, CI [1.00-1.06], p=0.01), LAF (OR 1.03, CI [1.00-1.06], p=0.02), LARR and LVRR (OR 1.04, CI [1.01-1.07], p=0.002, respectively). LARR was found in 75 patients, while LVRR in 111. Patients with heart remodeling had less incidence of LAF and cardiac adverse events, better diastolic function and improved their NYHA class after surgery.

CONCLUSIONS

LAVI should be given more weight into decision making for patients with MR as it predicts POAF and LAF and reverse atrial and ventricular remodeling, both associated to long-term outcome.

Review of mitral valve insufficiency: repair or replacement

Mitral valve (MV) dysfunction is the second-most common clinically significant form of valvular defect in adults. MV regurgitation occurs with the increasing frequency of degenerative changes of the aging process. Moreover, other causes of clinically significant MV regurgitation include cardiac ischemia, infective endocarditis and rhematic disease more frequently in less developed countries. Recent evidence suggests that the best outcomes after repair of severe degenerative mitral regurgitation (MR) are achieved in asymptomatic or minimally symptomatic patients, who are selected for surgery soon after diagnosis on the basis of echocardiography. This review will focus on the surgical management of mitral insufficiency according to its aetiology today and will give insight to some of the perspectives that lay in the future.

Surgical timing of degenerative mitral regurgitation: what to consider

Severe primary mitral regurgitation (MR) is a progressive condition which engenders significant mortality and morbidity if left untreated. The optimal timing of surgery in patients with MR of degenerative origin continues to be debated, especially for those who are asymptomatic. Apart from symptoms, current authoritative guidelines recommend intervention when there is incipient left ventricular dysfunction, pulmonary hypertension or new onset atrial fibrillation. This review focuses on the asymptomatic subject with severe MR, and examines contemporary clinical decision-making and management strategies, including the 2012 European guidelines on valvular heart disease. We discuss the rationale for risk stratifying the asymptomatic individual, and highlight current and novel diagnostic tools that may have a useful role, with an emphasis on echocardiographic imaging.

Degenerative mitral valve regurgitation: best practice revolution

Degenerative mitral valve disease often leads to leaflet prolapse due to chordal elongation or rupture, and resulting in mitral valve regurgitation. Guideline referral for surgical intervention centres primarily on symptoms and ventricular dysfunction. The recommended treatment for degenerative mitral valve disease is mitral valve reconstruction, as opposed to valve replacement with a bioprosthetic or mechanical valve, because valve repair is associated with improved event free survival. Recent studies have documented a significant number of patients are not referred in a timely fashion according to established guidelines, and when they are subjected to surgery, an alarming number of patients continue to undergo mitral valve replacement. The debate around appropriate timing of intervention for asymptomatic severe mitral valve regurgitation has put additional emphasis on targeted surgeon referral and the need to ensure a very high rate of mitral valve repair, particularly in the non-elderly population. Current clinical practice remains suboptimal for many patients, and this review explores the need for a ‘best practice revolution’ in the field of degenerative mitral valve regurgitation.