Chronic viral hepatitis in kidney transplantation

Post-Transplant Glomerulonephritis: Challenges and Solutions

Glomeruli can be damaged in several conditions after kidney transplantation, with a potential impact on the graft function and survival. Primary glomerulonephritis, a group of glomerular immunological damage that results in variable histological patterns and clinical phenotypes, can occur in kidney transplant recipients as a recurrent or de novo condition. Specific immunologic conditions associated with kidney transplantation, such as acute rejection episodes, can act as an additional trigger after transplantation, impacting the incidence of these glomerulopathies. The post-transplant GN recurrence ranges from 3% to 15%, varying according to the GN subtype and post-transplant time, mainly occurring after 3-5 years of kidney transplantation. Advances in the knowledge of glomerulonephritis pathophysiology have provided new approaches to pre-transplant risk evaluation and post-transplant monitoring. Glomeruli can be affected by several systemic viral infections, such as human immunodeficiency virus (HIV), hepatitis C virus (HCV), hepatitis B virus (HBV), severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-COV-2), cytomegalovirus (CMV), and BK virus. The diagnosis of these infections, as well as the identification of possible complications associated with them, are important to minimize the negative impacts of these conditions on kidney transplant recipients' outcomes.

Comparative Survival Analysis of Dialysis and Renal Transplantation in HBV-Infected End-Stage Renal Disease Patients

BACKGROUND

The potential risks and benefits of kidney transplantation in patients with end-stage renal disease (ESRD) infected with hepatitis B virus (HBV) have been a subject of debate. This study aimed to provide real-world data on the relative risks of death and clinical outcomes associated with kidney transplantation in this context.

METHODS

We conducted a longitudinal cohort study using the National Health Insurance Research Database from 1997 to 2013, extracting cohorts of patients who are HBV-infected ESRD. The main outcome measure was overall survival, whereas the secondary measure was the relative risk of death and survival benefit through propensity-score matching (1:1).

RESULTS

Of the 4895 patients who are HBV-infected with ESRD, 172 renal transplant recipients were enrolled for analysis. There was a numeric trend towards higher overall survival rates in renal transplant recipients, although this was not statistically significant (P = .057). A significant survival benefit was observed in the renal transplant group if the follow-up was longer than one year (P = 0.007). The relative risks of death among renal transplant recipients were initially higher at 2.0 times that of patients on chronic dialysis, presenting in a hyperbolic pattern with equal risks at 462 days. The likelihood of survival became equal until 1649 days.

CONCLUSIONS

Our study suggests that kidney transplantation may be a viable option for patients who are HBV-infected with ESRD, given the significant improvement in quality of life and reduction of death risks observed four to five years after successful transplantation. This real-world data can help clinicians make informed decisions regarding the management of ESRD in patients who are HBV-infected.

Rituximab and hepatitis B reactivation in HBsAg-negative/ anti-HBc-positive kidney transplant recipients

Background

Hepatitis B virus (HBV) reactivation is a well-known complication of immunosuppressive therapy. Although rituximab is increasingly used for desensitization of ABO-incompatible or positive crossmatch kidney transplantation, the risk of HBV reactivation in hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg)-negative/hepatitis B core antibody (anti-HBc)-positive kidney transplant patients receiving rituximab desensitization remains undetermined.

Methods

We analysed 172 resolved HBV patients who underwent living donor kidney transplantation between 2008 and 2014. Patients were divided into rituximab ( n  =  49) or control ( n  =  123) groups. All patients were observed for HBV reactivation, which was defined as the reappearance of hepatitis B surface antigen or HBV DNA.

Results

During the follow-up period (median, 58 months; range, 4-95 months), five patients (10.2%) in the rituximab group and two patients (1.6%) in the control group experienced HBV reactivation (P   =   0.003). In the rituximab group, two patients experienced HBV-related severe hepatitis, and one patient died due to hepatic failure. The median time from rituximab desensitization to HBV reactivation was 11 months (range, 5-22 months). By contrast, no patients in the control group experienced severe hepatitis. The status of hepatitis B surface antibody was similar between groups. Rituximab desensitization [hazard ratio (HR), 9.18; 95% confidence interval (CI), 1.74-48.86; P   =   0.009] and hepatitis B surface antibody status (HR, 4.74; 95% CI, 1.05-21.23, P =   0.04) were significant risk factors for HBV reactivation.

Conclusions

Rituximab desensitization for incompatible kidney transplantation significantly increased the risk of HBV reactivation in HBsAg-negative/anti-HBc-positive patients. Therefore, close monitoring of HBV DNA is required in these patients.

Ledipasvir/sofosbuvir is effective and well tolerated in postkidney transplant patients with chronic hepatitis C virus

Patients with end-stage renal diseases on hemodialysis have a high prevalence of hepatitis C infection (HCV). In most patients, treatment for HCV is delayed until postrenal transplant. We assessed the effectiveness and tolerance of ledipasvir/sofosbuvir (LDV/SOF) in 32 postkidney transplant patients infected with HCV. The group was composed predominantly of treatment-naïve (75%) African American (68.75%) males (75%) infected with genotype 1a (62.5%). Most patients received a deceased donor kidney graft (78.1%). A 96% sustained viral response (SVR) was reported (27/28 patients). One patient relapsed. One patient with baseline graft dysfunction developed borderline rejection. No graft loss was reported. Six HIV-coinfected patients were included in our analysis. Five of these patients achieved SVR 12. There were four deaths, and one of the deaths was in the HIV group. None of the deaths were attributed to therapy. Coinfected patients tolerated therapy well with no serious adverse events. Serum creatinine remained stable at baseline, end of therapy, and last follow-up, (1.351±.50 mg/dL; 1.406±.63 mg/dL; 1.290±.39 mg/dL, respectively). In postkidney transplant patients with HCV infection with or without coinfection with HIV, a combination of LDV/SOF was well tolerated and effective.

Pretransplant Hepatitis B Viral Infection Increases Risk of Death After Kidney Transplantation: A Multicenter Cohort Study in Korea

Clinical outcomes in kidney transplant recipients (KTRs) with hepatitis B virus (HBV) have not been thoroughly evaluated. Here, we investigated recent posttransplant clinical outcomes of KTRs with HBV and compared them with KTRs with hepatitis C virus (HCV) and seronegative KTRs.Of 3855 KTRs from April 1999 to December 2011, we enrolled 3482 KTRs who had viral hepatitis serology data; the patients were followed up for 89.1 ± 54.1 months. The numbers of recipients with HBV and HCV were 160 (4.6%) and 55 (1.6%), respectively. We analyzed the clinical outcomes, including overall mortality and graft failure, among patients who had undergone kidney transplantation.Patients with HBV showed poorer survival (P = 0.019; adjusted hazard ratio [HR] = 2.370; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.155-4.865) than KTRs without HBV. However, the graft survival of patients with chronic hepatitis B did not differ from that of patients without HBV. Hepatic complications were the primary causes of mortality of KTRs with HBV. Mortality significantly correlated with a higher grade of inflammation (P = 0.002) and with the use of lamivudine or adefovir antiviral treatment (P = 0.016). HBV-positive KTRs treated with the new-generation antiviral agent entecavir showed improved patient survival compared with KTRs receiving lamivudine (log-rank P = 0.050). HCV did not affect patient survival; however, it increased the incidence of graft failure (P = 0.010; adjusted HR = 2.899; 95% CI: 1.289-6.519). KTRs with HCV had an increased incidence of acute rejection (log-rank P = 0.005, crude HR = 2.144; 95% CI: 1.341-3.426; P = 0.001).KTRs with chronic hepatitis B may exhibit poor survival due to post-transplantation hepatic complications. Pretransplant histological liver evaluations and adequate antiviral management with potent nucleoside/nucleotide analogues are needed to improve the survival of KTRs with chronic hepatitis B even when liver function is within the normal range.

Increased risk of hepatic complications in kidney transplantation with chronic virus hepatitis infection: A nationwide population-based cohort study

Data regarding the risk of various liver diseases among different hepatitis viruses in kidney transplantation have not yet been identified.We selected individuals with kidney transplantation (ICD-9-CM V420 or 996.81) from 2000–2009 from the catastrophic illness registry of National Health Insurance Research Database (NHIRD)as the study cohort. The two end-points in the study included overall death, and post-transplant occurrence of hepatic disease. After adjustment for other risk factors, the risk of mortality was increased in patients with HBV infection (N = 352) and with HCV infection (N = 275) compared to those with neither HBV nor HCV infection (N = 3485). In addition,renal transplant recipients with HBV alone,HCV alone, and both with HBV and HCVinfectionrespectively had an approximately 10-fold hazard ratio (HR) = 9.84, 95% confidence interval (CI): 4.61–21.0, 4-fold increased risk (HR = 4.40, 95% CI: 1.85–10.5)and 5-fold increased risk (HR = 4.63, 95% CI: 1.06–20.2)of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC)compared to those with neither HBV nor HCV infection. Our findings showed a significant risk of de novo liver disease in recipients with hepatitis virus infection. Based on our findings, we reinforce the importance and impact of hepatitis virus in renal transplantation.

HLA-DRB1 and susceptibility to kidney allograft rejection in Southern Iranian patients

Kidney transplantation is the best treatment option for the patients with end-stage renal disease. Viral infections and genetic factors such as HLA-II antigens may affect the kidney transplant outcome. The compatibility of HLA-DRB1 molecules in the survival of kidney transplant is important. Also, the correlation between these molecules and viral infections is significant. The current study investigates the allele frequency of HLA-DRB1 in 41 recipient kidney transplant and 203 normal healthy controls by polymerase chain reaction using sequence specific primers. Moreover the relation between HLA-DRB1 allelic groups and hepatitis B, hepatitis C and cytomegalovirus viral infections was also studied. However statistical analysis of the allele frequencies didn't show any significant association between HLA-DRB1 allelic group distributions or sharing and susceptibility to acute kidney transplant rejection (P > 0.05). Comparing the allele frequencies between HLA-DRB1*14 and DRB1*04 allelic showed a significant difference in controls and patients (P = 0.03 and P = 0.05 respectively). The results of the present study also showed a significant association between possession of HLA-DRB1*07 allele in kidney transplant recipients and hepatitis C virus infection (P = 0.009). In conclusion however the results of the present study did not showed relation between HLA-DRB1 allele's frequencies or sharing and kidney transplantation outcome, the results indicated that HLA-DRB1 alleles may susceptible individuals to renal disease or play a role in susceptibility to viral infection in kidney transplant patients.

The Physiology of Brain Death and Organ Donor Management

Brain death is associated with complex physiologic changes that may impact the management of the potential organ donor. Medical management is critical to actualizing the individual or family’s intent to donate and maximizing the benefit of that intent. This interval of care in the PICU begins with brain death and consent to donation and culminates with surgical organ procurement. During this phase, risks for hemodynamic instability and compromise of end organ function are high. The brain dead organ donor is in a distinct and challenging pathophysiologic condition that culminates in multifactorial shock. The potential benefits of aggressive medical management of the organ donor may include increased number of donors providing transplantable organs and increased number of organs transplanted per donor. This may improve graft function, graft survival, and patient survival in those transplanted. In this chapter, pathophysiologic changes occurring after brain death are reviewed. General and organ specific donor management strategies and logistic considerations are discussed. There is a significant opportunity for enhancing donor multi-organ function and improving organ utilization with appropriate PICU management.

Comparison of clinical outcomes in hepatitis B virus-positive kidney transplant recipients with or without pretransplantation antiviral therapy

BACKGROUND

Antiviral agents have improved the outcomes of hepatitis B virus (HBV)-positive kidney transplant recipients (KTRs). Preemptive therapy has been the main approach to forestall HBV reactivation. We sought to compare prophylactic and preemptive approaches.

METHODS

We divided the 69 HBV-positive KTRs into treatment and historical control groups, according to the time of starting pretransplantation antiviral therapy. The treatment group was further divided into prophylactic and preemptive therapy groups.

RESULTS

The treatment group showed a significant improvement in 10-year graft (82% vs 34%) and patient (91% vs 57%) survivals. Among the historical control group, the main causes of graft failure were patient deaths (68%), which were mostly caused by liver diseases. In contrast, there was no liver-related death in the treatment group. In addition, there was no difference in graft or patient survival between the prophylactic and preemptive groups, but the incidence of HBV reactivation was lower in the prophylactic group. Antiviral therapy was an independent factor for the improved patient survival (P = .005).

CONCLUSIONS

Pretransplantation antiviral therapy is essential to improve clinical outcomes. Prophylactic may be better than preemptive antiviral therapy to decrease HBV reactivation.

Expression of the full-length HCV core subgenome from HCV gentoype-1a and genotype-3a and evaluation of the antigenicity of translational products

BACKGROUND

Hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection is a major public health problem in India. Detection of HCV and its genotypes by simple and economic assays is a prime requirement in the planning of antiviral treatments for patients infected with this virus. Although commercial assays are available for the detection of both HCV RNA and genotypes, efforts aimed at the development of simple and economical systems for these measurements are still going on.

AIM

The present study was designed to clone and express the HCV CORE gene from HCV genotype-1a and genotype-3a and use the peptides to develop immunoassays for the detection of genotype-specific antibodies in sera samples.

METHODS

One hundred and thirty-five serum samples from patients with liver and renal diseases were screened for HCV RNA by real-time PCR, followed by HCV genotyping in RNA-positive sera by restriction fragment length polymorphism, sequencing, and phylogenetic analysis. The HCV CORE gene was amplified from sera carrying HCV genotype-1a and genotype-3a and cloned and expressed in the pET19b vector. The translational products were used to develop a western blot assay for the detection of genotype-specific anti-HCV antibodies.

RESULTS

The HCV CORE gene, from both genotypes, was cloned and expressed successfully, with production of a 26 kDa recombinant protein in either case. Using peptides in a western blot assay, 101 sera samples were tested for the anti-HCV CORE antibody. Each peptide showed a reaction with anti-HCV total antibody without showing any genotype-specific binding. This indicates that individual peptides obtained from different genotypes do not have a genotype-specific epitope to bind with antibodies.

CONCLUSION

Cloning and expression of the HCV CORE gene from genotype-1a and genotype-3a was successful. However, the peptides formed did not show genotype-specific binding with anti-HCV.

Treatment of hepatitis B in patients with chronic kidney disease

Although the prevalence of chronic hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection in patients with chronic kidney disease remains low in developed countries, clinicians should be aware of the rationale for treatment in this setting. This patient population presents particular features and various complicating conditions requiring special treatment strategies. Interferon, the standard treatment for HBV infection, has been poorly tolerated by patients with chronic kidney disease, has presented relatively low efficacy, and has posed renal transplant recipients under the risk of acute rejection. The advent of effective nucleos(t)ide analogs (NAs) has offered the opportunity to minimize the consequences of HBV infection in HBV-positive patients with chronic kidney disease. Combination with immunosuppressive agents might be considered in cases of rapid renal function deterioration and/or severe proteinuria. Among the newer NAs, entecavir may be preferred, because of its high potency, high genetic barrier to resistance, and favorable renal safety profile. However, entecavir presented low efficacy in case of lamivudine or telbivudine resistance, and thus tenofovir may be a better option in that setting. All HBsAg-positive candidates should be treated with NAs before renal transplantation in order to maintain undetectable HBV DNA, reduce liver fibrosis, and prevent hepatic decompensation after renal transplantation. This review summarizes updated issues related to treatment of chronic HBV infection in all categories of population with chronic kidney disease (those exhibiting HBV-associated glomerular disease, those treated with hemodialysis, as well as renal transplant candidates, donors, and recipients).

Hepatitis C and renal transplantation

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

The purpose of this review is to describe the new insights of hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection and renal transplantation.

RECENT FINDINGS

HCV is its most frequent cause of liver disease after transplantation. In the long run, HCV infection can lead to cirrhosis, hepatocarcinoma and death in some patients. As interferon is generally contraindicated after transplantation, the best way to treat patients is before transplantation. Long-term patient and graft survival rates are lower in HCV-positive patients than in HCV-negative graft recipients. HCV infection is an independent risk factor for death and graft loss. Mortality is higher, mainly as a result of cardiovascular complications, liver disease and infections but is lower than in HCV-positive patients on the transplant waiting list. New-onset diabetes after transplantation (NODAT), and HCV-related glomerulonephritis, together with chronic rejection and notably transplant glomerulopathy can contribute to graft failure. Despite this factor, transplantation is the best option for the HCV-positive patient on dialysis. Renal transplantation with kidneys from donors with positive anti-HCV antibodies into HCV RNA-positive recipients seems to be safe in the long term.

SUMMARY

Renal transplantation is the therapy of choice for dialysis patients with HCV infection. To improve the results, a careful follow-up in the outpatient clinic for early detection of HCV-related complications is mandatory.

A study on the biochemical and the morphological changes in the liver in renal transplant recipients with an evidence of the HBV and the HCV infections

CONTEXT

Renal transplantation is the definitive treatment in renal failure patients. Liver disease is a known problem in renal transplant recipients. They may be consequent to immunosuppression, drug toxicity, altered immune response to viruses and hemodialysis.

AIMS

The aim of this study was to analyze and correlate the biochemical parameters and histopathology of liver biopsy among renal transplant recipients with both HBV and HCV infection and to correlate them.

SETTING

The study group had thirty cases. Enrolment criteria included coinfection with HBV and HCV ; elevated liver enzymes and recipient of renal allograft. There was acontrol group of ten patients who were HBC and HCV positive but had not undergone renal transplant.

MATERIAL & METHODS

Liver function tests including alkaline phosphatase, SGOT, SGPT and serum bilirubin levels were donet. Percutaneous liver biopsies were carried out using Menghini's needle.. Stains done included hematoxylin and eosin (H & E), vanGieson, reticulin and Perl's stain. Histopathological grading was performed using Metavir scoring system. Immunohistochemistry (IHC) was done where required for ground glass hepatocytes. Correlation of SGOT, SGPT and Alkaline phosphatase of the study group and the controls was carried out with the grading.

STATISTICAL ANALYSIS

Statistical tests done included paired "t" test at 5% and test of probability.

RESULTS

There was no statistically significant correlation between the controls and the transplanted patients. It was concluded that serum enzyme levels could be used to predict histological grade in the control group but not in the transplant recipients (p>0.05).

Virus-drug interactions--molecular insight into immunosuppression and HCV

Liver transplantation is an effective treatment for end-stage liver disease that is attributable to chronic HCV infection. However, long-term outcomes are compromised by universal virological recurrence in the graft. Reinfection that occurs after transplantation has increased resistance to current interferon-based antiviral therapy and often leads to accelerated development of cirrhosis. Important risk factors for severe HCV recurrence are linked to immunosuppression. Owing to the lack of good randomized, controlled trials, the optimal choice of immunosuppressants is still debated. By contrast, much progress has been made in the understanding of HCV biology and the antiviral action of interferons. These new insights have greatly expanded our knowledge of the molecular interplay between HCV and immunosuppressive drugs. In this article, we explore the effect of different immunosuppressants on the complex cellular events involved in HCV infection and interferon signalling. Potential implications for clinical practice and future drug development are discussed.

The novel immunosuppressive protein kinase C inhibitor sotrastaurin has no pro-viral effects on the replication cycle of hepatitis B or C virus

The pan-protein kinase C (PKC) inhibitor sotrastaurin (AEB071) is a novel immunosuppressant currently in phase II trials for immunosuppression after solid organ transplantation. Besides T-cell activation, PKC affects numerous cellular processes that are potentially important for the replication of hepatitis B virus (HBV) and hepatitis C virus (HCV), major blood-borne pathogens prevalent in solid organ transplant recipients. This study uses state of the art virological assays to assess the direct, non-immune mediated effects of sotrastaurin on HBV and HCV. Most importantly, sotrastaurin had no pro-viral effect on either HBV or HCV. In the presence of high concentrations of sotrastaurin, well above those used clinically and close to levels where cytotoxic effects become detectable, there was a reduction of HCV and HBV replication. This reduction is very likely due to cytotoxic and/or anti-proliferative effects rather than direct anti-viral activity of the drug. Replication cycle stages other than genome replication such as viral cell entry and spread of HCV infection directly between adjacent cells was clearly unaffected by sotrastaurin. These data support the evaluation of sotrastaurin in HBV and/or HCV infected transplant recipients.