Rheumatoid arthritis: citrullination alters the inflammatory properties of chemokines in inflammatory arthritis

Immunotherapy for Melanoma: The Significance of Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors for the Treatment of Advanced Melanoma

Therapeutic options for treating advanced melanoma have progressed rapidly in recent decades. Until 6 years ago, the regimen for treating advanced melanoma consisted mainly of cytotoxic agents such as dacarbazine and type I interferons. Since 2014, anti-programmed cell death 1 (PD1) antibodies have been recognized as anchor drugs for treating advanced melanoma, with or without additional combination drugs such as ipilimumab, but the efficacies of these immunotherapies are not fully satisfactory. In this review, we describe the development of the currently available anti-PD1 Abs-based immunotherapies for advanced melanoma, focusing on their efficacy and immune-related adverse events (AEs), as well as clinical trials still ongoing for the future treatment of advanced melanoma.

Circulating biomarkers of response to immunotherapy and immune-related adverse events

INTRODUCTION

Immune checkpoint blockade has revolutionized cancer treatment. However, response rates vary, and these treatments have a high rate of immune-related side effects, which can be limiting. Thus, tests to predict who will respond and who may experience side effects are of critical importance toward realizing the ultimate goal of precision oncology.

AREAS COVERED

We review several of the most recent advances in circulating biomarkers that have been reported to be useful in predicting response and immune-related adverse events (irAE) to checkpoint blockade immunotherapies (CBI). We focus on high-quality studies published within the last few years. We highlight significant findings, identify areas for improvement, and provide recommendations on how these biomarkers may be translated into clinical utility.

EXPERT OPINION

As newer immunotherapies are developed, there is a pressing need to identify circulating biomarkers that can help predict responses and side effects. Current studies are mostly small-scale and retrospective; there is a need for larger-scale and prospective studies to help validate several of the biomarkers detailed here. As oncology focuses more on precision-based approaches, it is likely that a combination of biomarkers, including circulating ones as detailed here, will have critical utility in guiding clinical decisions.

Serum soluble CD163 and proinflammatory chemokines may be biomarkers of the onset of adverse events in dabrafenib plus trametinib combination therapy for advanced melanoma

Various adverse events (AEs) have been reported to occur at a high rate in patients treated with dabrafenib plus trametinib (D + T) combination therapy. Among such AEs, the incidence of pyrexia was highest among the series of AEs in patients treated with D + T combination therapy. Although little is known about the mechanisms of pyrexia caused by D + T combination therapy, a recent report suggested that sCD163, as well as interferon-inducible chemokines (CXCL9, CXCL10, CXCL11), might correlate with pyrexia caused by encorafenib plus binimetinib combination therapy. In addition to these soluble factors, CXCL5 is a biomarker for predicting immune-related AEs in melanoma patients treated with nivolumab. From the above findings, we hypothesized that these soluble factors might also correlate with the onset of AEs in D + T combination therapy. The serum levels of sCD163 were increased in patients with pyrexia in parallel with their severity, whereas the serum levels of CXCL5 were increased in patients without pyrexia. Moreover, increased levels of CXCL9, CXCL10, and CXCL11 were prominent in patients with AEs over G2 levels. As these chemokines recruit Th1, Th17, and activated CD8+ T cells, increased serum levels of these chemokines might correlate with the positive feedback of inflammatory reactions related to AEs.

Association of Baseline Serum Levels of CXCL5 With the Efficacy of Nivolumab in Advanced Melanoma

Anti-programmed cell death protein 1 (PD1) antibodies are in wide use for the treatment of various cancers. PD1 antibody-based immunotherapy, co-administration of nivolumab and ipilimumab, is one of the optimal immunotherapies, especially in advanced melanoma with high tumor mutation burden. Since this combined therapy leads to a high frequency of serious immune-related adverse events (irAEs) in patients with advanced melanoma, biomarkers are needed to evaluate nivolumab efficacy to avoid serious irAEs caused by ipilimumab. This study analyzed baseline serum levels of CXCL5, CXCL10, and CCL22 in 46 cases of advanced cutaneous melanoma treated with nivolumab. Baseline serum levels of CXCL5 were significantly higher in responders than in non-responders. In contrast, there were no significant differences in baseline serum levels of CXCL10 and CCL22 between responders and non-responders. These results suggest that baseline serum levels of CXCL5 may be useful as a biomarker for identifying patients with advanced cutaneous melanoma most likely to benefit from anti-melanoma immunotherapy.

Serum levels of soluble CD163 and CXCL5 may be predictive markers for immune-related adverse events in patients with advanced melanoma treated with nivolumab: a pilot study

Antibodies against PD-1, such as nivolumab and pembrolizumab, are widely used in the treatment of various cancers including advanced melanoma. The anti-PD-1 Ab significantly prolongs survival in patients with metastatic melanoma, and its administration in combination with local or systemic therapy may also lead to improved outcomes. Although anti-PD-1 Ab-based combined therapy might be effective for the treatment of advanced melanoma, the associated risk of irAEs is an important consideration. Therefore, being able to predict irAEs is of great interest to oncologists. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the value of using serum levels of sCD163 and CXCL5 to predict irAEs in patients with advanced melanoma who were administered nivolumab. To this end, we analyzed these serum levels in 46 cases of advanced melanoma treated with nivolumab. In addition, the tumor stroma was evaluated by immunohistochemistry and immunofluorescence. We measured the serum levels of sCD163 and CXCL5 on day 0 (immediately before nivolumab administration) and day 42. The serum absolute levels of sCD163 were significantly increased in patients who developed AEs (p = 0.0018). Although there was no significant difference in serum levels of CXCL5, the absolute value of CXCL5 could at least be a supportive marker for the increased absolute levels of serum sCD163. This study suggests that sCD163 and CXCL5 may serve as possible prognostic biomarkers for irAEs in patients with advanced melanoma treated with nivolumab.

Phase I study of nivolumab combined with IFN-β for patients with advanced melanoma

The efficacy of nivolumab is greater than that of other anti-melanoma drugs, so nivolumab-based combined therapies that enhance anti-tumor immune responses in patients with metastatic melanoma are of great interest to dermato-oncologists. As we have previously reported, IFN-β enhances the anti-tumor immune response of anti-PD-1 antibodies against B16F10 melanoma in vivo. To explore the potential of this property of IFN-β as part of a combination therapy for the treatment of metastatic melanoma patients, we performed a phase 1 trial, using a traditional rule-based 3 + 3 design, on patients with advanced melanoma. The nivolumab dose was fixed at 2 mg/kg, every 3 weeks. IFN-β was administered to three groups at doses of 1 million, 2 million, and 3 million units, respectively. Dose-limiting toxicities were defined as any grade 3-5 adverse events occurring between day 0 and day 42 that might possibly be related to nivolumab and IFN-β. Of the nine patients who received this combined therapy, none experienced dose-limiting toxicities, and all completed the treatment phase of the study. Patient follow-up continued for 6 months following the final treatment. There were two complete responses (22%) and one partial response (11%), all of which occurred in patients who had received monthly IFN-β immediately prior to the study. In this study, we determined the safe dose of IFN-β, when combined with nivolumab, to be 3 million units. To determine the efficacy of this combination therapy, further phase II trials are required.