Neuroinflammation in fibromyalgia and CRPS: top-down or bottom-up?

The vicious cycle of chronic endometriosis and depression-an immunological and physiological perspective

Endometriosis is a chronic, estrogen-dependent, proinflammatory disease that can cause various dysfunctions. The main clinical manifestations of endometriosis include chronic pelvic pain and impaired fertility. The disease is characterized by a spectrum of dysfunctions spanning hormonal signaling, inflammation, immune dysregulation, angiogenesis, neurogenic inflammation, epigenetic alterations, and tissue remodeling. Dysregulated hormonal signaling, particularly involving estrogen and progesterone, drives abnormal growth and survival of endometrial-like tissue outside the uterus. Chronic inflammation, marked by immune cell infiltration and inflammatory mediator secretion, perpetuates tissue damage and pain. Altered immune function, impaired ectopic tissue clearance, and dysregulated cytokine production contribute to immune dysregulation. Enhanced angiogenesis promotes lesion growth and survival. Epigenetic modifications influence gene expression patterns, e.g., HSD11B1 gene, affecting disease pathogenesis. Endometriosis related changes and infertility lead to depression in diagnosed women. Depression changes lifestyle and induces physiological and immunological changes. A higher rate of depression and anxiety has been reported in women diagnosed with endometriosis, unleashing physiological, clinical and immune imbalances which further accelerate chronic endometriosis or vice versa. Thus, both endometriosis and depression are concomitantly part of a vicious cycle that enhance disease complications. A multidimensional treatment strategy is needed which can cater for both endometrial disease and depression and anxiety disorders.

Prevalence and Risk Factors of Central Sensitization in Women with Endometriosis

STUDY OBJECTIVE

To assess prevalence of central sensitization (CS) and its association with demographic and clinical factors in patients with endometriosis.

DESIGN

Single-center, observational, cross-sectional study.

SETTING

Tertiary center.

PATIENTS

Consecutive patients with endometriosis referred to the center from January 15, 2022, to April 30, 2022.

INTERVENTIONS

For each enrolled patient, demographic and clinical data were collected, and the presence of CS was measured using the CS Inventory questionnaire (score ≥40).

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

Primary study outcome was CS prevalence, and secondary study outcomes were the associations between demographic and clinical factors and CS. The 95% confidence intervals for CS prevalence were obtained with Bayesian-derived Jeffreys method, and the associations between CS and demographic and clinical factors were evaluated with the chi-square test and Fisher's exact test, where appropriate. The variables significantly associated with CS were then included in a multivariable logistic regression model. The significance level was set at .05 for all analyses. During the study period, 285 eligible women were enrolled. CS prevalence was 41.4% (95% confidence interval, 35.8-47.2). At univariable analysis, infertility, moderate to severe pain symptoms (except for dyschezia), altered bowel movements, posterolateral parametrium involvement, hormonal therapy failure (HTF), and most of central sensitivity syndromes were significantly associated with CS occurrence. Multivariable analysis only confirmed the significant association of CS with moderate to severe chronic pelvic pain, posterolateral parametrium involvement, HTF, migraine or tension-type headache, irritable bowel syndrome, and anxiety or panic attacks.

CONCLUSION

CS has a high prevalence in patients with endometriosis, especially in those with moderate to severe chronic pelvic pain, posterolateral parametrium involvement, HTF, and 3 central sensitivity syndromes (i.e. migraine or tension-type headache, irritable bowel syndrome, anxiety or panic attacks). Given the association with HTF, identifying CS through CS Inventory might be useful to counsel the patient and to choose multimodal treatment.

Nociplastic pain: towards an understanding of prevalent pain conditions

Nociplastic pain is the semantic term suggested by the international community of pain researchers to describe a third category of pain that is mechanistically distinct from nociceptive pain, which is caused by ongoing inflammation and damage of tissues, and neuropathic pain, which is caused by nerve damage. The mechanisms that underlie this type of pain are not entirely understood, but it is thought that augmented CNS pain and sensory processing and altered pain modulation play prominent roles. The symptoms observed in nociplastic pain include multifocal pain that is more widespread or intense, or both, than would be expected given the amount of identifiable tissue or nerve damage, as well as other CNS-derived symptoms, such as fatigue, sleep, memory, and mood problems. This type of pain can occur in isolation, as often occurs in conditions such as fibromyalgia or tension-type headache, or as part of a mixed-pain state in combination with ongoing nociceptive or neuropathic pain, as might occur in chronic low back pain. It is important to recognise this type of pain, since it will respond to different therapies than nociceptive pain, with a decreased responsiveness to peripherally directed therapies such as anti-inflammatory drugs and opioids, surgery, or injections.

Melatonin Plus Folic Acid Treatment Ameliorates Reserpine-Induced Fibromyalgia: An Evaluation of Pain, Oxidative Stress, and Inflammation

Background: Fibromyalgia is a chronic condition characterized by increased sensory perception of pain, neuropathic/neurodegenerative modifications, oxidative, and nitrosative stress. An appropriate therapy is hard to find, and the currently used treatments are able to target only one of these aspects. Methods: The aim of this study is to investigate the beneficial effects of melatonin plus folic acid administration in a rat model of reserpine-induced fibromyalgia. Sprague–Dawley male rats were injected with 1 mg/kg of reserpine for three consecutive days and later administered with melatonin, folic acid, or both for twenty-one days. Results: Administration of reserpine led to a significant decrease in the nociceptive threshold as well as a significant increase in depressive-like symptoms. These behavioral changes were accompanied by increased oxidative and nitrosative stress. Lipid peroxidation was significantly increased, as well as nitrotyrosine and PARP expression, while superoxide dismutase, nonprotein thiols, and catalase were significantly decreased. Endogenously produced oxidants species are responsible for mast cell infiltration, increased expression pro-inflammatory mediators, and microglia activation. Conclusion: Melatonin plus acid folic administration is able to ameliorate the behavioral defects, oxidative and nitrosative stress, mast cell infiltration, inflammatory mediators overexpression, and microglia activation induced by reserpine injection with more efficacy than their separate administration.

Ambroxol for the treatment of fibromyalgia: science or fiction?

Fibromyalgia appears to present in subgroups with regard to biological pain induction, with primarily inflammatory, neuropathic/neurodegenerative, sympathetic, oxidative, nitrosative, or muscular factors and/or central sensitization. Recent research has also discussed glial activation or interrupted dopaminergic neurotransmission, as well as increased skin mast cells and mitochondrial dysfunction. Therapy is difficult, and the treatment options used so far mostly just have the potential to address only one of these aspects. As ambroxol addresses all of them in a single substance and furthermore also reduces visceral hypersensitivity, in fibromyalgia existing as irritable bowel syndrome or chronic bladder pain, it should be systematically investigated for this purpose. Encouraged by first clinical observations of two working groups using topical or oral ambroxol for fibromyalgia treatments, the present paper outlines the scientific argument for this approach by looking at each of the aforementioned aspects of this complex disease and summarizes putative modes of action of ambroxol. Nevertheless, at this point the evidence basis for ambroxol is not strong enough for clinical recommendation.