Rheumatoid arthritis: Forward and reverse inheritance - the yin and the yang

Pregnancy loss and the risk of rheumatoid arthritis in Chinese women: findings from the China Kadoorie biobank

Considering the female preponderance of rheumatoid arthritis (RA), and disease onset typically after the reproductive years, pregnancy and childbirth may play a role in the aetiology of the disease. Adverse outcomes of pregnancy have been found to precede the diagnosis of autoimmune diseases, including RA, but the evidence is scant and inconsistent. Therefore, we investigate whether pregnancy loss is associated with the risk of RA in Chinese women. Data from the China Kadoorie Biobank, conducted by the University of Oxford and the Chinese Centre for Disease Control and Prevention, of 299,629 Chinese women who had been pregnant were used. Multivariable logistic regression and stratified analyses were employed to analyse the association between types of pregnancy loss with the risk of RA. Pregnancy loss was significantly associated with increased risk of RA (OR 1.12, 95% CI 1.06–1.18), specifically, spontaneous (OR 1.11, 95% CI 1.03–1.20) and induced abortions (OR 1.11, 95% CI 1.06–1.17). There was no significant association between stillbirth and the risk of RA (OR 1.07, 95% CI 0.97–1.18). The risk of developing RA increases with the number of pregnancy losses: one loss confers an OR of 1.09 (95% CI 1.03–1.16), two an OR of 1.13 (95% CI 1.05–1.20), three or more an OR of 1.19 (95% CI 1.10–1.28) and OR of 1.06 (95% CI 1.03–1.08) for each additional. Spontaneous and induced abortions are associated with an increased risk of RA in Chinese women.

Nonendocrine mechanisms of sex bias in rheumatic diseases

Rheumatic diseases affect a wide range of individuals of all ages, but the most common diseases occur more frequently in women than in men, at ratios of up to ten women to one man. Despite a growing number of studies on sex bias in rheumatic diseases, sex-specific health care is limited and sex specificity is not systematically integrated into treatment regimens. Women and men differ in three major biological points: the number of X chromosomes per cell, the type and quantities of sex hormones present and the ability to be pregnant, all of which have immunological consequences. Could a greater understanding of these differences lead to a new era of personalized sex-specific medicine? This Review focuses on the main genetic and epigenetic mechanisms that have been put forward to explain sex bias in rheumatic diseases, including X chromosome inactivation, sex chromosome aneuploidy and microchimerism. The influence of sex hormones is not discussed in detail in this Review, as it has been well described elsewhere. Understanding the sex-specific factors that contribute to the initiation and progression of rheumatic diseases will enable progress to be made in the diagnosis, treatment and management of all patients with these conditions.

Immunogenicity of a rheumatoid arthritis protective sequence when acquired through microchimerism

HLA class II genes provide the strongest genetic contribution to rheumatoid arthritis (RA). HLA-DRB1 alleles encoding the sequence DERAA are RA-protective. Paradoxically, RA risk is increased in women with DERAA⁺ children born prior to onset. We developed a sensitive qPCR assay specific for DERAA, and found 53% of DERAA^-/- women with RA had microchimerism (Mc; pregnancy-derived allogeneic cells) carrying DERAA (DERAA-Mc) vs. 6% of healthy women. DERAA-Mc quantities correlated with an RA-risk genetic background including DERAA-binding HLA-DQ alleles, early RA onset, and aspects of RA severity. CD4⁺ T cells showed stronger response against DERAA⁺ vs. DERAA^- allogeneic cell lines in vitro, in line with an immunogenic role of allogeneic DERAA. Results indicate a model where DERAA-Mc activates DERAA-directed T cells that are naturally present in DERAA^-/- individuals and can have cross-reactivity against joint antigens. Moreover, we provide an explanation for the enigmatic observation that the same HLA sequence differentially affects RA risk through Mendelian inheritance vs. microchimeric cell acquisition.