Effect of CYP3A5*3 genetic variant on the metabolism of direct-acting antivirals in vitro: a different effect on asunaprevir versus daclatasvir and beclabuvir

Influence of Piperine and Omeprazole on The Regional Absorption of Daclatasvir from Rabbit Intestine

The study assessed the site dependent intestinal absorption of daclatasvir and investigated the effects of piperine and omeprazole on such absorption utilizing in situ rabbit intestinal perfusion technique. The intestinal absorption of daclatasvir was assessed in four segments: duodenum, jejunum, ileum, and colon. The effect of co-perfusion with omeprazole was monitored through the tested anatomical sites. The effect of piperine, a P-glycoprotein (P-gp) inhibitor on daclatasvir absorption from jejunum and ileum was tested. The results showed that daclatasvir was incompletely absorbed from the rabbit small and large intestine. The absorptive clearance per unit length (PeA/L) was site dependent and was ranked as colon > duodenum > jejunum > ileum. This rank is the opposite of the rank of P-gp intestinal content suggesting possible influence for P-gp. Co-perfusion with omeprazole increased PeA/L and this was evidenced also with reduced the L95% of daclatasvir from both small and large intestinal segments. Significant enhancement in daclatasvir absorption through jejunum and ileum was shown in presence of piperine. Daclatasvir showed site dependent intestinal absorption in a manner suggesting its affection by P-gp efflux. This effect was inhibited by piperine. Co-administration of daclatasvir with omeprazole can enhance intestinal absorption a phenomenon which requires extension to human pharmacokinetic investigation. This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.

Effect of the Most Relevant CYP3A4 and CYP3A5 Polymorphisms on the Pharmacokinetic Parameters of 10 CYP3A Substrates

Several cytochrome P450 (CYP) CYP3A polymorphisms were associated with reduced enzyme function. We aimed to evaluate the influence of these alleles on the pharmacokinetic parameters (PK) of several CYP3A substrates. We included 251 healthy volunteers who received a single dose of ambrisentan, atorvastatin, imatinib, aripiprazole, fentanyl, amlodipine, donepezil, olanzapine, fesoterodine, or quetiapine. The volunteers were genotyped for CYP3A4 and CYP3A5 polymorphisms by qPCR. To compare the PK across studies, measurements were corrected by the mean of each parameter for every drug and were logarithmically transformed. Neither CYP3A phenotype nor individual CYP3A4 or CYP3A5 polymorphisms were significantly associated with differences in PK. However, regarding the substrates that are exclusively metabolized by CYP3A, we observed a higher normalized AUC (p = 0.099) and a tendency of lower normalized Cl (p = 0.069) in CYP3A4 mutated allele carriers what was associated with diminished drug metabolism capacity. CYP3A4 polymorphisms did not show a pronounced influence on PK of the analysed drugs. If so, their impact could be detectable in a very small percentage of subjects. Although there are few subjects carrying CYP3A4 double mutations, the effect in those might be relevant, especially due to the majority of subjects lacking the CYP3A5 enzyme. In heterozygous subjects, the consequence might be less noticeable due to the high inducible potential of the CYP3A4 enzyme.