Ductus arteriosus outcome with focus on the initially patent but hemodynamically insignificant ductus in preterm neonates

Sex Differences in Patent Ductus Arteriosus Incidence and Response to Pharmacological Treatment in Preterm Infants: A Systematic Review, Meta-Analysis and Meta-Regression

A widely accepted concept in perinatal medicine is that boys are more susceptible than girls to complications of prematurity. However, whether this ‘male disadvantage of prematurity’ also involves persistent patent ductus arteriosus (PDA) has been scarcely investigated. Our aim was to conduct a systematic review and meta-analysis on studies addressing sex differences in the risk of developing PDA among preterm infants. We also investigated whether the response to pharmacological treatment of PDA differs between boys and girls. PubMed/Medline and Embase databases were searched. The random-effects male/female risk ratio (RR) and 95% confidence interval (CI) were calculated. We included 146 studies (357,781 infants). Meta-analysis could not demonstrate sex differences in risk of developing any PDA (37 studies, RR 1.03, 95% CI 0.97 to 1.08), hemodynamically significant PDA (81 studies, RR 1.00, 95% CI 0.97 to 1.02), or in the rate of response to pharmacological treatment (45 studies, RR 1.01, 95% CI 0.98 to 1.04). Subgroup analysis and meta-regression showed that the absence of sex differences was maintained over the years and in different geographic settings. In conclusion, both the incidence of PDA in preterm infants and the response rate to pharmacological treatment of PDA are not different between preterm boys and girls.

Ratio of arterial blood pressures at borders of window surrounding systolic peak indicates patent ductus arteriosus in preterm infants

OBJECTIVE

Presence of a patent ductus arteriosus (PDA) in neonates is assessed by echocardiography. Echocardiographic assessment has disadvantages, primarily its discontinuous nature. We hypothesize that the continuously measured ratio of arterial blood pressures (ABP) at the borders of a window surrounding the systolic peak ratio discriminates non-PDA from PDA patients.

APPROACH

Preterm infants (gestational age <32 weeks) with and without PDA were included. Patients were divided into controls (n = 8) and PDA patients (n = 22), the latter with a subset of patients with closed PDA after three doses Ibuprofen (n = 10). For each patient, a six-hour ABP segment from 12 AM to 6 AM on the day of echocardiographic assessment patency or closure of the DA was selected. The mean ratio of the ABP values a samples before and p samples after the systolic peak (R _ABP) was calculated for each segment. If R _ABP < 1, the patient was predicted to have a PDA. The a and p with the least misclassifications were selected (-64 and +104 ms).

MAIN RESULTS

R _ABP was significantly lower in PDA patients (median 0.95, IQR 0.06) compared to controls (median 1.05, IQR 0.10; p = 0.0024). R _ABP correctly predicted 19 out of 22 patients (86.4%) and six out of eight controls (75%). R _ABP increased after closure in nine out of 10 patients (median 1.01, IQR 0.04; p = 0. 0182).

SIGNIFICANCE

R _ABP may discriminate preterm PDA patients from non-PDA patients and can be calculated continuously from clinical data measured during standard of care.