Successful implementation of an intracranial hemorrhage (ICH) bundle in reducing severe ICH: a quality improvement project

Quality Improvement Interventions to Prevent Intraventricular Hemorrhage: A Systematic Review

OBJECTIVES

Quality improvement may reduce the incidence and severity of intraventricular hemorrhage in preterm infants. We evaluated quality improvement interventions (QIIs) that sought to prevent or reduce the severity of intraventricular hemorrhage.

METHODS

PubMed, CINAHL, Embase, and citations of selected articles were searched. QIIs that had reducing incidence or severity of intraventricular hemorrhage in preterm infants as the primary outcome. Paired reviewers independently extracted data from selected studies.

RESULTS

Eighteen quality improvement interventions involving 5906 infants were included. Clinical interventions in antenatal care, the delivery room, and the NICU were used in the QIIs. Four of 10 QIIs reporting data on intraventricular hemorrhage (IVH) and 9 of 14 QIIs reporting data on severe IVH saw improvements. The median Quality Improvement Minimum Quality Criteria Set score was 11 of 16. Clinical intervention heterogeneity and incomplete information on quality improvement methods challenged the identification of the main reason for the observed changes. Publication bias may result in the inclusion of more favorable findings.

CONCLUSIONS

QIIs demonstrated reductions in the incidence and severity of intraventricular hemorrhage in preterm infants in some but not all settings. Which specific interventions and quality improvement methods were responsible for those reductions and why they were successful in some settings but not others are not clear. This systematic review can assist teams in identifying potentially better practices for reducing IVH, but improvements in reporting and assessing QIIs are needed if systematic reviews are to realize their potential for guiding evidence-based practice.

The Feasibility and Impact of a Postresuscitation Care Protocol in the Well Baby Nursery

OBJECTIVE

The objective of this study is to determine if a postresuscitation care (PRC) protocol in the well baby nursery (WBN) would improve identification of infants requiring neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) admission.

STUDY DESIGN

This is a retrospective and prospective cohort study of a PRC protocol in 765 WBN admissions after delivery room (DR) resuscitation with continuous positive airway pressure and/or positive pressure ventilation.

RESULTS

After protocol initiation, NICU transfers during the birth hospitalization increased significantly (11.17 vs. 16.08%, p < 0.05). There was no difference in incidence of NICU transfer (5.99 vs. 7.29%, pre-PRC vs. PRC, p = 0.47) during the first 4 hours of life during protocol administration. Respiratory distress was the most common indication for NICU transfer in both cohorts (7.90 vs. 11.81%, p = 0.09, pre-PRC vs. PRC). Noninvasive positive pressure and/or high-flow nasal cannula (5.72 vs. 9.55%, p = 0.06, pre-PRC vs. PRC) were routinely administered in the NICU to transferred infants.

CONCLUSION

After apparent recovery from DR resuscitation, WBN admissions experience significant risk of complications requiring NICU transfer, supporting Neonatal Resuscitation Program recommendation for enhanced monitoring. In our study, we demonstrated the feasibility of standardized PRC protocol in the WBN. NICU transfers increased after initiation of a PRC protocol; however, further studies are needed to confirm possible benefits of this PRC protocol in improving identification of infants requiring a higher level of care.

KEY POINTS

· A PRC protocol in WBN is feasible and associated with increased NICU transfer.. · Despite initial apparent recovery, delayed presentation of respiratory distress is a frequent morbidity.. · Increased surveillance as recommended by Neonatal Resuscitation Program is indicated in this population..

Quality improvement in the golden hour for premature infants: a scoping review

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE

Evidence-based research has shown that golden hour quality improvement (QI) measures can improve the quality of care and reduce serious complications of premature infants. Herein, we sought to review golden hour QI studies to evaluate the impact on the outcome of preterm infants.

METHODS

A comprehensive literature search was conducted in PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, and SinoMed databases from inception to April 03, 2023. Only studies describing QI interventions in the golden hour of preterm infants were included. Outcomes were summarized and qualitative synthesis was performed.

RESULTS

Ten studies were eligible for inclusion. All studies were from single centers, of which nine were conducted in the USA and one in Israel. Seven were pre-post comparative studies and three were observational studies. Most included studies were of medium quality (80%). The most common primary outcome was admission temperatures and glucose. Five studies (n = 2308) reported improvements in the admission temperature and three studies (n = 2052) reported improvements in hypoglycemia after QI. Four studies (n = 907) showed that the incidence of bronchopulmonary dysplasia (BPD) was lower in preterm infants after QI: 106/408 (26.0%) vs. 122/424(29.5%) [OR = 0.68, 95% CI 0.48-0.97, p = 0.04].

CONCLUSIONS

Our study showed that the golden hour QI bundle can improve the short-term and long-term outcomes for extremely preterm infants. There was considerable heterogeneity and deficiencies in the included studies, and the variation in impact on outcomes suggests the need to use standardized and validated measures. Future studies are needed to develop locally appropriate, high-quality, and replicable QI projects.

Variations in care of neonates during therapeutic hypothermia: call for care practice bundle implementation

BACKGROUND

Therapeutic hypothermia (TH) is the gold-standard treatment for moderate and severe neonatal encephalopathy (NE). Care during TH has implications for long-term outcomes. Outcome variability exists among neonatal intensive care units (NICUs) in Canada, but care variations are not understood well. This study examines variations in care practices for neonates with NE treated with TH in NICUs across Canada.

METHODS

A non-anonymous, web-based questionnaire was emailed to tertiary NICUs in Canada providing TH for NE to assess care practices during the first days of life and neurodevelopmental follow-up.

RESULTS

Ninety-two percent (24/26) responded. Centres followed national guidelines regarding the use of the modified Sarnat score to assess the initial severity of NE, the need to initiate TH within the first 6 h of birth, and the importance of follow-up. However, other practices varied, including ventilation mode, definition/treatment of hypotension, routine echocardiography, use of sedation, use of electroencephalogram (EEG), MRI timing, placental analysis, and follow-up duration.

CONCLUSIONS

NICUs across Canada follow available national guidelines, but variations exist in practices for managing NE during TH. Development and implementation of a consensus-based care bundle for neonates during TH may reduce practice variability and improve outcomes.

IMPACT

This survey describes the current HIE care practices and variation among tertiary centres in Canada. Variations exist in the care of neonates with NE treated with TH in NICUs across Canada. This paper Identifies areas of variation that are not discussed in detail in the national guidelines and will help to set up quality improvement initiatives. Elucidating the variation in care practices calls for the creation and implementation of a national, consensus-based care bundle, with the objective to improve the outcomes of these critically ill neonates.

Impact of quality improvement outreach education on the incidence of acute brain injury in transported neonates born premature

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate impact of a quality improvement (QI) outreach education on incidence of acute brain injury in transported premature neonates.

STUDY DESIGN

Neonates born at &lt;33 weeks gestation outside the tertiary center were included. The QI intervention was a combination of neuroprotection care bundle, in-person visits, and communication system improvement. Descriptive and regression (adjusting for Gestational Age, Birth Weight, Gender, and antenatal steroids, Mode of delivery, Apgars at 5 minutes, Prophylactic indomethacin, PDA, and Inotropes use) analyses were performed. The primary outcome was a composite of death and/or severe brain injury on cranial ultrasound using a validated classification.

RESULTS

181 neonates studied (93 before and 88 after). The rate and adjusted odds of death and/or severe brain injury reduced significantly post intervention (30% vs 15%) and (AOR 0.36, 95%CI, 0.15-0.85, P = 0.02) respectively.

CONCLUSION

Implementation of outreach education targeting neuroprotection can reduce acute brain injury in transported premature neonates.

Charge Nurses Taking Charge, Challenging the Culture of Culture-Negative Sepsis, and Preventing Central-Line Infections to Reduce NICU Antibiotic Usage

OBJECTIVE

We aimed to reduce our monthly antibiotic usage rate (AUR, days of treatment per 1,000 patient-days) in the neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) from a baseline of 330 (July 2015-April 2016) to 200 by December 2018.

STUDY DESIGN

We identified three key drivers as follows: (1) engaging NICU charge nurses, (2) challenging the culture of culture-negative sepsis, and (3) reducing central-line associated bloodstream infections (CLABSI). Our main outcome was AUR. The percentage of culture-negative sepsis that was treated with antibiotics for >48 hours and CLABSI was our process measure. We used hospital cost/duration of hospitalization and mortality as our balancing measures.

RESULTS

After testing several plan-do-study-act (PDSA) cycles, we saw a modest reduction in AUR from 330 in the year 2016 to 297 in the year 2017. However, we did not find a special-cause variation in AUR via statistical process control (SPC) analysis (u'-chart). Thereafter, we focused our efforts to reduce CLABSI in January 2018. As a result, our mean AUR fell to 217 by December 2018. Our continued efforts resulted in a sustained reduction in AUR beyond the goal period. Importantly, cost of hospitalization and mortality did not increase during the improvement period.

CONCLUSION

Our sequential quality improvement (QI) efforts led to a reduction in AUR. We implemented processes to establish a robust antibiotic stewardship program that included antibiotic time-outs led by NICU charge nurses and a focus on preventing CLABSI that were sustained beyond the QI period.

KEY POINTS

· This is a quality improvement project to reduce antibiotic usage in NICU.. · Charge nurses should take charge to reduce infections in NICU.. · Central line infections should be reduced to decrease antibiotic usage..

Reduction of Severe Intraventricular Hemorrhage in Preterm Infants: A Quality Improvement Project

OBJECTIVES

The aim of this quality improvement project was to reduce the rate of severe intraventricular hemorrhage (sIVH) by 50% within 3 years for extremely preterm infants born at a children's teaching hospital.

METHODS

A multidisciplinary team developed key drivers for the development of intraventricular hemorrhage in preterm infants. Targeted interventions included the development of potentially better practice guidelines, promoting early noninvasive ventilation, consistent use of rescue antenatal betamethasone, and risk-based indomethacin prophylaxis. The outcome measure was the rate of sIVH. Process measures included the rate of intubation within 24 hours and receipt of rescue betamethasone and risk-based indomethacin prophylaxis. Common markers of morbidity were balancing measures. Data were collected from a quarterly chart review and analyzed with statistical process control charts. The preintervention period was from January 2012 to March 2016, implementation period was from April 2016 to December 2018, and sustainment period was through June 2020.

RESULTS

During the study period, there were 268 inborn neonates born at <28 weeks' gestation or <1000 g (127 preintervention and 141 postintervention). The rate of sIVH decreased from 14% to 1.2%, with sustained improvement over 2 and a half years. Mortality also decreased by 50% during the same time period. This was associated with adherence to process measures and no change in balancing measures.

CONCLUSIONS

A multipronged quality improvement approach to intraventricular hemorrhage prevention, including evidence-based practice guidelines, consistent receipt of rescue betamethasone and indomethacin prophylaxis, and decreasing early intubation was associated with a sustained reduction in sIVH in extremely preterm infants.

Intracranial Hemorrhage and 2-Year Neurodevelopmental Outcomes in Infants Born Extremely Preterm

OBJECTIVES

To determine the incidence, timing, progression, and risk factors for intracranial hemorrhage (ICH) in infants 24^0/7 to 27^6/7 weeks of gestational age and to characterize the association between ICH and death or neurodevelopmental impairment (NDI) at 2 years of corrected age.

STUDY DESIGN

Infants enrolled in the Preterm Erythropoietin Neuroprotection Trial had serial cranial ultrasound scans performed on day 1, day 7-9, and 36 weeks of postmenstrual age to evaluate ICH. Potential risk factors for development of ICH were examined. Outcomes included death or severe NDI as well as Bayley Scales of Infant and Toddler Development, 3rd Edition, at 2 years of corrected age.

RESULTS

ICH was identified in 38% (n = 339) of 883 enrolled infants. Multiple gestation and cesarean delivery reduced the risk of any ICH on day 1. Risk factors for development of bilateral Grade 2, Grade 3, or Grade 4 ICH at day 7-9 included any ICH at day 1; 2 or more doses of prenatal steroids decreased risk. Bilateral Grade 2, Grade 3, or Grade 4 ICH at 36 weeks were associated with previous ICH at day 7-9. Bilateral Grade 2, any Grade 3, and any Grade 4 ICH at 7-9 days or 36 weeks of postmenstrual age were associated with increased risk of death or severe NDI and lower Bayley Scales of Infant and Toddler Development, 3rd Edition, scores.

CONCLUSIONS

Risk factors for ICH varied by timing of bleed. Bilateral and increasing grade of ICH were associated with death or NDI in infants born extremely preterm.

Impact of a “Brain Protection Bundle” in Reducing Severe Intraventricular Hemorrhage in Preterm Infants <30 Weeks GA: A Retrospective Single Centre Study

Background: despite advances in perinatal care, periventricular/intraventricular hemorrhage (IVH) continues to remain high in neonatal intensive care units (NICUs) worldwide. Studies have demonstrated the benefits of implementing interventions during the antenatal period, stabilization after birth (golden hour management) and postnatally in the first 72 h to reduce the incidence of IVH. Objective: to compare the incidence of severe intraventricular hemorrhage (IVH ≥ Grade III) before and after implementation of a “brain protection bundle” in preterm infants <30 weeks GA. Study design: a pre- and post-implementation retrospective cohort study to compare the incidence of severe IVH following execution of a “brain protection bundle for the first 72 h from 2015 to 2018. Demographics, management practices at birth and in the NICU, cranial ultrasound results and short-term morbidities were compared. Results: a total of 189 and 215 infants were included in the pre- and post-implementation phase, respectively. No difference in the incidence of severe IVH (6.9% vs. 9.8%, p = 0.37) was observed on the first cranial scan performed after 72 h of age. Conclusion: the implementation of a “brain protection bundle” was not effective in reducing the incidence of severe IVH within the first 72 h of life in our centre.

Proposing a care practice bundle for neonatal encephalopathy during therapeutic hypothermia

Neonates with neonatal encephalopathy (NE) often present with multi-organ dysfunction that requires multidisciplinary specialized management. Care of the neonate with NE is thus complex with interaction between the brain and various organ systems. Illness severity during the first days of birth, and not only during the initial hypoxia-ischemia event, is a significant predictor of adverse outcomes in neonates with NE treated with therapeutic hypothermia (TH). We thus propose a care practice bundle dedicated to support the injured neonatal brain that is based on the current best evidence for each organ system. The impact of using such bundle on outcomes in NE remains to be demonstrated.

Precision Medicine in Neonates: A Tailored Approach to Neonatal Brain Injury

Despite advances in neonatal care to prevent neonatal brain injury and neurodevelopmental impairment, predicting long-term outcome in neonates at risk for brain injury remains difficult. Early prognosis is currently based on cranial ultrasound (CUS), MRI, EEG, NIRS, and/or general movements assessed at specific ages, and predicting outcome in an individual (precision medicine) is not yet possible. New algorithms based on large databases and machine learning applied to clinical, neuromonitoring, and neuroimaging data and genetic analysis and assays measuring multiple biomarkers (omics) can fulfill the needs of modern neonatology. A synergy of all these techniques and the use of automatic quantitative analysis might give clinicians the possibility to provide patient-targeted decision-making for individualized diagnosis, therapy, and outcome prediction. This review will first focus on common neonatal neurological diseases, associated risk factors, and most common treatments. After that, we will discuss how precision medicine and machine learning (ML) approaches could change the future of prediction and prognosis in this field.

The development of neonatal neurointensive care

Brain injury remains one of the major unsolved problems in neonatal care, with survivors at high risk of lifelong neurodisability. It is unlikely that a single intervention can ameliorate neonatal brain injury, given the complex interaction between pathological processes, developmental trajectory, genetic susceptibility, and environmental influences. However, a coordinated, interdisciplinary approach to understand the root cause enables early detection, and diagnosis with enhanced clinical care offering the best chance of improving outcomes and facilitate new lines of neuroprotective treatments. Adult neurointensive care has existed as a speciality in its own right for over 20 years; however, it is only recently that large prospective studies have demonstrated the benefit of this model of care. The 'Neuro-intensive Care Nursery' model originated at the University of California San Francisco in 2008, and since then a growing number of units worldwide have adopted this approach. As well as providing consistent coordinated care for infants from a multidisciplinary team, it provides opportunities for specialist education and training in neonatal neurology, neuromonitoring, neuroimaging and nursing. This review outlines the origins of brain-oriented care of the neonate and the development of the Neuro-NICU (neonatal intensive care unit) and discusses some of the challenges and opportunities in expanding this model of care.

The neurointensive nursery: concept, development, and insights gained

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

With the advent of therapeutic hypothermia for treatment of hypoxic ischemic encephalopathy, and improvements in neuroimaging and bedside neuromonitoring, a new era of neonatal brain-focused care has emerged in recent years. We describe the development of the first neurointensive care nursery (NICN) as a model for comanagement of neonates with identified neurologic risk factors by a multidisciplinary team constituted of neurologists, neonatologists, specialized nurses, and others with the goal of optimizing management, preventing secondary injury and maximizing long-term outcomes.

RECENT FINDINGS

Optimizing brain metabolic environment and perfusion and preventing secondary brain injury are key to neurocritical care. This includes close management of temperature, blood pressure, oxygenation, carbon dioxide, and glucose levels. Early developmental interventions and involvement of physical and occupational therapy provide additional assessment information. Finally, long-term follow-up is essential for any neurocritical care program.

SUMMARY

The NICN model aims to optimize evidence-based care of infants at risk for neurologic injury. Results from ongoing hypothermia and neuroprotective trials are likely to yield additional treatments. New technologies, such as functional MRI, continuous neurophysiological assessment, and whole genomic approaches to rapid diagnosis may further enhance clinical protocols and neonatal precision medicine. Importantly, advances in neurocritical care improve our ability to provide comprehensive information when counseling families. Long-term follow-up data will determine if the NICN/Neuro-NICU provides enduring benefit to infants at risk for neurologic injury.