In the grey zone-survival and morbidities of periviable births

Differences in the attitudes towards resuscitation of extremely premature infants between neonatologists and obstetricians: a survey study in China

Objectives

Neonatologists and obstetricians are crucial decision-makers regarding the resuscitation of extremely preterm infants (EPIs). However, there is a scarcity of research regarding the differing perspectives on EPI resuscitation between these medical professionals. We aim to determine the differences and influential factors of their attitudes towards EPIs resuscitation in China.

Methods

This cross-sectional study was conducted in public hospitals of 31 provinces in Chinese mainland from June to July 2021. Influential factors of binary variables and those of ordinal variables were analyzed by modified Poisson regression models and multinomial logistic regression models due to the invalid parallel line assumption of ordinal logistic regression models.

Results

A total of 832 neonatologists and 1,478 obstetricians who were deputy chief physicians or chief physicians participated. Compared with obstetricians, neonatologists delivered a larger proportion of infants of <28-week gestational age (87.74% vs. 84.91%) and were inclined to think it inappropriate to use 28 weeks as the cutoff of gestational age for providing full care to premature infants [63.34% vs. 31.60%, adjusted prevalence ratio = 1.61 (95% CI: 1.46-1.77)], and to suggest smaller cutoffs of gestational age and birth weight for providing EPIs resuscitation. Notably, 46.49% of the neonatologists and 19.01% of the obstetricians believed infants ≤24 weeks' gestation should receive resuscitation.

Conclusions

In China, notable disparities exist in attitudes of neonatologists and obstetricians towards resuscitating EPIs. Strengthening collaboration between these two groups and revising the pertinent guidelines as soon as possible would be instrumental in elevating the resuscitation rate of EPIs.

Ethical Dilemmas in Neonatal Care at the Limit of Viability

Advances in neonatal care have pushed the limit of viability to incrementally lower gestations over the last decades. However, surviving extremely premature neonates are prone to long-term neurodevelopmental handicaps. This makes ethics a crucial dimension of periviable birth management. At 22 weeks, survival ranges from 1 to 15%, and profound disabilities in survivors are common. Consequently, there is no beneficence-based obligation to offer any aggressive perinatal management. At 23 weeks, survival ranges from 8 to 54%, and survival without severe handicap ranges from 7 to 23%. If fetal indication for cesarean delivery appears, the procedure may be offered when neonatal resuscitation is planned. At a gestational age ≥24 weeks, up to 51% neonates are expected to survive the neonatal period. Survival without profound neurologic disability ranges from 12 to 38%. Beneficence-based obligation to intervene is reasonable at these gestations. Nevertheless, autonomy of parents should also be respected, and parental consent should be sought prior to any intervention. Optimal counselling of parents involves harmonized cooperation of obstetric and neonatal care providers. Every fetus/neonate and every pregnant woman are different and have the right to be considered individually when treatment decisions are being made.

Obstetricians' Attitudes Toward the Treatment of Extremely Preterm Infants in China

IMPORTANCE

Extremely preterm infants (EPIs) are at high risk of mortality and disability, and whether obstetricians are active in treating EPIs is directly related to whether EPIs can get an opportunity to enter the neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) for treatment. A greater understanding of the attitudes of obstetricians toward the treatment of EPIs is needed to improve treatment of this population and optimize pediatric health policies and services.

OBJECTIVE

To clarify the attitudes of obstetricians toward the treatment of EPIs in China.

DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS

A cross-sectional, online, questionnaire-based survey was conducted among obstetricians from various provinces and cities in China through the wenjuanxing application (a survey platform) between June and July 2021. The questionnaire included characteristics of the participants, their experiences in delivering EPIs, their attitudes toward EPI resuscitation, and their opinions about the cutoff for providing full care to preterm infants in China. Possible factors associated with their attitudes toward the cutoff for providing full care to preterm infants were analyzed by logistic regression. Data analysis was performed from August 2021 to January 2022.

MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES

The attitudes of obstetricians toward the resuscitation and treatment of EPIs, and the current cutoff for providing full care to premature infants.

RESULTS

A total of 2817 valid questionnaires were recovered from 30 provinces and cities in mainland China. Of the 2817 obstetricians (mean [SD] age, 41.76 [8.50] years) investigated, 156 (5.5%) were male, 2661 (94.5%) were female, 1339 (47.5%) were deputy chief physicians or chief physicians, 1662 (59.0%) were from tertiary hospitals, and 2048 (72.7%) had experience in delivering EPIs. The proportion of obstetricians who supported resuscitation of preterm infants was 19.1% (539 respondents) at a gestational age 24 weeks, 24.1% (679 respondents) at 25 weeks, 54.8% (1543 respondents) at 26 weeks, and 100.0% (2817 respondents) at 27 weeks. A total of 1326 obstetricians (47.1%) reported that it was common or very common for EPIs to be withdrawn from resuscitation and not to be admitted to the NICU for treatment. Regarding the treatment of EPIs with higher possibility of survival, 1621 obstetricians (57.5%) maintained that appropriate information should be communicated but their parents' wishes should be respected. Most obstetricians (2051 respondents [72.8%]) maintained that 28 weeks was the cutoff for providing full care to preterm infants in China; 766 respondents (27.2%) thought of it as inappropriate, suggesting the cutoff should be less than 28 weeks. Logistic regression analysis showed that these differences were significantly associated with the professional titles of the obstetricians, geographical regions, hospital levels and types, whether they had any experience in delivering EPIs, and the total number of EPIs born yearly in their units.

CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE

In this cross-sectional study, most Chinese obstetricians maintained a conservative attitude toward the treatment of EPIs. It was very common for EPIs to be withdrawn from treatment without entering the NICU directly after birth. Most obstetricians maintained that 28 weeks' gestational age should be the cutoff for providing full care to premature infants.

Ethics of care for the micropreemies. Just because we can, should we?

Debates about treatment for the tiniest premature babies focus on three different approaches - universal non-resuscitation, selective resuscitation, and universal resuscitation. Doctors, hospitals, and professional societies differ on which approach is preferable. The debate is evolving as studies show that survival rates for babies born at 22 and 23 weeks of gestation are steadily improving at centers that offer active treatment to these babies. Still, many centers do not offer such treatment or, if they do, actively discourage it. The doctors and centers that discourage treatment have concerns about the chances for survival, neurodevelopmental impairment among survivors, and cost. Centers that offer and encourage treatment cite evidence that many babies born at 22 weeks can survive, that most survivors have good neurodevelopmental outcomes, and that NICU care for tiny babies is cost-effective compared to many common and uncontroversial treatments. The debate touches on many fundamental ethical issues that have been present in neonatology since its inception as a medical specialty.