L1CAM and laminin vascular network: Association with the high-risk replacement histopathologic growth pattern in uveal melanoma liver metastases

Vessel co-option: a unique vascular-immune niche in liver cancer

Tumor vasculature is pivotal in regulating tumor perfusion, immune cell infiltration, metastasis, and invasion. The vascular status of the tumor is intricately linked to its immune landscape and response to immunotherapy. Vessel co-option means that tumor tissue adeptly exploits pre-existing blood vessels in the para-carcinoma region to foster its growth rather than inducing angiogenesis. It emerges as a significant mechanism contributing to anti-angiogenic therapy resistance. Different from angiogenic tumors, vessel co-option presents a distinctive vascular-immune niche characterized by varying states and distribution of immune cells, including T-cells, tumor-associated macrophages, neutrophils, and hepatic stellate cells. This unique composition contributes to an immunosuppressive tumor microenvironment that is crucial in modulating the response to cancer immunotherapy. In this review, we systematically reviewed the evidence and molecular mechanisms of vessel co-option in liver cancer, while also exploring its implications for anti-angiogenic drug resistance and the immune microenvironment, to provide new ideas and clues for screening patients with liver cancer who are effective in immunotherapy.

Immunohistochemical characterisation of the immune landscape in primary uveal melanoma and liver metastases

BACKGROUND

The immune landscape of uveal melanoma liver metastases (UMLM) has not been sufficiently studied.

METHODS

Immune cell infiltrates (ICIs), PD-1 and PD-L1 were characterised in 62 UMLM and 28 primary uveal melanomas (PUM). ICI, PD-1 and PD-L1 were scored as: (1) % tumoral area occupied by tumour-infiltrating lymphocytes or macrophages (TILs, TIMs) and (2) % perTumoral (perT) area. ICIs and other variables including histopathologic growth patterns (HGPs), replacement and desmoplastic, of UMLM were analysed for their prognostic value.

RESULTS

ICIs recognised by haematoxylin-eosin-saffron (HES) and IHC (e.g., T cells (CD3), B cells (CD20). Macrophages (CD68), (CD163), were primarily localised to the perT region in PUM and UMLM and were more conspicuous in UMLM. HES, CD3, CD4, FoxP3, CD8, CD20, PD-1 TILs were scant (<5%). TIMs were more frequent, particularly in UMLM than in PUM. Both CD68+ TIMs and HGPs remained significant on multivariate analysis, influencing overall (OS) and metastasis-specific overall survival (MSOS). CD68 + , CD163+ and CD20+ perT infiltrates in UMLM predicted increased OS and MSOS on univariate analysis.

CONCLUSIONS

TILs and PD-L1 have no predictive value in PUM or UMLM. CD68+ and CD163+TIMs, CD20+ perT lymphocytes, and HGPs are important prognostic factors in UMLMs.

Histopathological growth pattern evolution of tumor in VX2 liver cancer model

The histopathological growth pattern (HGP) is a morphological reflection of interactions between cancer cells and the surrounding tissue, and has been identified with a remarkably predictive value in liver metastases. However, there is still a lack of studies on HGP of primary liver cancer even furtherly on HGP evolution. We employed VX2 tumor-bearing rabbits as the primary liver cancer model of which tumor size and distant metastasis were investigated. HGP assessment and computed tomography scanning was performed in four cohorts of different time points to map the HGP evolution. Additionally, Fibrin deposition and neovascularization were evaluated by Masson staining and immunohistochemical analysis of CD31, hypoxia-inducible factor-1 alpha (HIF1A) and vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF). Tumors displayed exponential growth in the VX2 liver cancer model, but these tumor-bearing animals did not show any visible metastasis until they reached a specific stage of development. Correspondingly, the components of HGPs changed along with the tumor growth. The proportion of desmoplastic HGP (dHGP) decreased initially and then grew, but in contrast, the level of replacement HGP (rHGP) rose from the 7th day, reached a peak at around the 21st day, and then appeared drop. Importantly, the collagen deposition and expression of HIF1A and VEGF correlated with dHGP, while CD31 did not. HGP evolution presents a two-way switch including dHGP to rHGP and rHGP to dHGP, in which the emergence of rHGP may be linked to metastases. HIF1A-VEGF partially participates in the HGP evolution and presumably plays a key role in the formation of dHGP.

LINC02323 facilitates development of lung squamous cell carcinoma by miRNA sponge and RBP dysregulation and links to poor prognosis

BACKGROUND

The poor outcome of patients with lung squamous cell carcinoma (LUSC) highlights the importance of the identification of novel effective prognostic markers and therapeutic targets. Long noncoding RNAs (lncRNAs) have generally been considered to serve important roles in tumorigenesis and the development of various types of cancer, including LUSC.

METHODS

Here, we aimed to investigate the role of LINC02323 in LUSC and its potential mechanisms by performing comprehensive bioinformatic analyses.

RESULTS

LINC02323 was elevated and positively associated with unfavorable prognosis of LUSC patients. LINC02323 exerted oncogenic function by competitively binding to miR-1343-3p and miR-6783-3p, thereby upregulating L1CAM expression. Indeed, we also determined that LINC02323 could interact with the RNA-binding protein DDX3X, which regulates various stages of RNA expression and processing.

CONCLUSION

Taken together, we identified that LINC02323 and its indirect target L1CAM can act as novel biomarkers for determining the prognosis of patients with LUSC and thus deserves further study.

Hematogenous metastasis and tumor dormancy as concepts or dogma? The continuum of vessel co-option and angiotropic extravascular migratory metastasis as an alternative

It has been accepted for many years that tumor cells spread via the circulation to distant sites. The latency period between treatment and tumor recurrence has been attributed to dormant cells in distant organs that emerge and grow as metastatic tumors. These processes are accepted with an incomplete demonstration of their existence. Challenging such a well-established accepted paradigm is not easy as history as shown. An alternative or co-existing mechanism involving tumor cell migration along the outside of the vessels and co-option of the blood vessel has been studied for over 25 years and is presented. Several lines of data support this new mechanism of tumor spread and metastatic growth and is termed angiotropic extravascular migratory metastasis or EVMM. This slow migration along the outside of the vessel wall may explain the latency period between treatment and metastatic tumor growth. The reader is asked to be open to this possible new concept in how tumors spread and grow and the reason for this latency period. A full understanding of how tumors spread and grow is fundamental for the targeting of new therapeutics.