Treatment of higher risk acute lymphoblastic leukemia in young people (CCG-1961), long-term follow-up: a report from the Children's Oncology Group

Refining risk prediction in pediatric acute lymphoblastic leukemia through DNA methylation profiling

Acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) is the most prevalent cancer in children, and despite considerable progress in treatment outcomes, relapses still pose significant risks of mortality and long-term complications. To address this challenge, we employed a supervised machine learning technique, specifically random survival forests, to predict the risk of relapse and mortality using array-based DNA methylation data from a cohort of 763 pediatric ALL patients treated in Nordic countries. The relapse risk predictor (RRP) was constructed based on 16 CpG sites, demonstrating c-indexes of 0.667 and 0.677 in the training and test sets, respectively. The mortality risk predictor (MRP), comprising 53 CpG sites, exhibited c-indexes of 0.751 and 0.754 in the training and test sets, respectively. To validate the prognostic value of the predictors, we further analyzed two independent cohorts of Canadian (n = 42) and Nordic (n = 384) ALL patients. The external validation confirmed our findings, with the RRP achieving a c-index of 0.667 in the Canadian cohort, and the RRP and MRP achieving c-indexes of 0.529 and 0.621, respectively, in an independent Nordic cohort. The precision of the RRP and MRP models improved when incorporating traditional risk group data, underscoring the potential for synergistic integration of clinical prognostic factors. The MRP model also enabled the definition of a risk group with high rates of relapse and mortality. Our results demonstrate the potential of DNA methylation as a prognostic factor and a tool to refine risk stratification in pediatric ALL. This may lead to personalized treatment strategies based on epigenetic profiling.

Chemotherapy-related symptoms in children with leukemia: application of latent profile analysis and network analysis

PURPOSE

Children with leukemia may experience a range of chemotherapy-related symptoms. Identifying subgroups and their distinct characteristics of symptoms may improve symptom management. We aimed to identify subgroups and their distinct characteristics of chemotherapy-related symptoms in children with leukemia.

METHODS

A cross-sectional survey was conducted among 500 children with leukemia, who completed questionnaires that assessed their demographic and clinical characteristics, as well as the Memorial Symptom Assessment Scale. Latent profile analysis was conducted to identify subgroups of symptoms. Additionally, multiple regression analysis and network analysis were utilized to reveal the characteristics of each subgroup.

RESULTS

Four subgroups were identified: "Profile 1: low symptom burden subgroup" (26.2%), "Profile 2: moderate symptom burden subgroup in transitional period" (14.8%), "Profile 3: moderate psychological symptom burden subgroup" (35.6%), and "Profile 4: high symptom burden subgroup" (23.4%). Multiple logistic regression analysis indicated that lower primary caregiver's education level, lower family monthly income, self-paid medical expenses, induction remission period, and consolidation enhancement period were associated with more severe symptoms of subgroups. Network analysis further revealed that nausea was the core symptom in Profiles 1 and 2, while the core symptom in Profile 3 was "I don't look like myself." Additionally, worrying was the core symptom in Profile 4.

CONCLUSION

There exists heterogeneity in chemotherapy-related symptoms. Four subgroups and their corresponding characteristics of children with varying symptom severity were identified. Identifying these subgroups will facilitate personalized care, maximize intervention effectiveness, and alleviate symptom burden.

Central nervous system status is prognostic in T-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia: a Children's Oncology Group report

To determine the prognostic significance of central nervous system (CNS) leukemic involvement in newly diagnosed T-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia (T-ALL), outcomes on consecutive, phase 3 Children's Oncology Group clinical trials were examined. AALL0434 and AALL1231 tested efficacy of novel agents within augmented-Berlin-Frankfurt-Münster (aBFM) therapy. In addition to testing study-specific chemotherapy through randomization, the AALL0434 regimen delivered cranial radiation therapy (CRT) to most participants (90.8%), whereas AALL1231 intensified chemotherapy to eliminate CRT in 88.2% of participants. In an analysis of 2164 patients with T-ALL (AALL0434, 1550; AALL1231, 614), 1564 had CNS-1 (72.3%), 441 CNS-2 (20.4%), and 159 CNS-3 (7.3%). The 4-year event-free-survival (EFS) was similar for CNS-1 (85.1% ± 1.0%) and CNS-2 (83.2% ± 2.0%), but lower for CNS-3 (71.8% ± 4.0%; P = .0004). Patients with CNS-1 and CNS-2 had similar 4-year overall survival (OS) (90.1% ± 0.8% and 90.5% ± 1.5%, respectively), with OS for CNS-3 being 82.7% ± 3.4% (P = .005). Despite therapeutic differences, outcomes for CNS-1 and CNS-2 were similar regardless of CRT, intensified corticosteroids, or novel agents. Except for significantly superior outcomes with nelarabine on AALL0434 (4-year disease-free survival, 93.1% ± 5.2%), EFS/OS was inferior with CNS-3 status, all of whom received CRT. Combined analyses of >2000 patients with T-ALL identified that CNS-1 and CNS-2 status at diagnosis had similar outcomes. Unlike B-ALL, CNS-2 status in T-ALL does not impact outcome with aBFM therapy, without additional intrathecal therapy, with or without CRT. Although nelarabine improved outcomes for those with CNS-3 status, novel approaches are needed. These trials were registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov as #NCT00408005 (AALL0434) and #NCT02112916 (AALL1231).

Outcomes of Childhood Noninfant Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia With 11q23/KMT2A Rearrangements in a Modern Therapy Era: A Retrospective International Study

PURPOSE

We aimed to study prognostic factors and efficacy of allogeneic hematopoietic stem-cell transplantation (allo-HSCT) in first remission of patients with noninfant childhood acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) with 11q23/KMT2A rearrangements treated with chemotherapy regimens between 1995 and 2010.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Data were retrospectively retrieved from 629 patients with 11q23/KMT2A-rearranged ALL from 17 members of the Ponte-di-Legno Childhood ALL Working Group. Clinical and biologic characteristics, early response assessed by minimal residual disease at the end of induction (EOI) therapy, and allo-HSCT were analyzed for their impact on outcomes.

RESULTS

A specific 11q23/KMT2A translocation partner gene was identified in 84.3% of patients, with the most frequent translocations being t(4;11)(q21;q23) (n = 273; 51.5%), t(11;19)(q23;p13.3) (n = 106; 20.0%), t(9;11)(p21_22;q23) (n = 76; 14.3%), t(6;11)(q27;q23) (n = 20; 3.8%), and t(10;11)(p12;q23) (n = 14; 2.6%); 41 patients (7.7%) had less frequently identified translocation partner genes. Patient characteristics and early response varied among subgroups, indicating large biologic heterogeneity and diversity in therapy sensitivity among 11q23/KMT2A-rearranged ALL. The EOI remission rate was 93.2%, and the 5-year event-free survival (EFS) for the entire cohort was 69.1% ± 1.9%, with a range from 41.7% ± 17.3% for patients with t(9;11)-positive T-ALL (n = 9) and 64.8% ± 3.0% for patients with t(4;11)-positive B-ALL (n = 266) to 91.2% ± 4.9% for patients with t(11;19)-positive T-ALL (n = 34). Low EOI minimal residual disease was associated with favorable EFS, and induction failure was particularly predictive of nonresponse to further therapy and relapse and poor EFS. In addition, EFS was not improved by allo-HSCT compared with chemotherapy only in patients with both t(4;11)-positive B-ALL (n = 64 v 51; P = .10) and 11q23/KMT2A-rearranged T-ALL (n = 16 v 10; P = .69).

CONCLUSION

Compared with historical data, prognosis of patients with noninfant 11q23/KMT2A-rearranged ALL has improved, but allo-HSCT failed to affect outcome. Targeted therapies are needed to reduce relapse and treatment-related mortality rates.

Time to Cure for Childhood and Young Adult Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia Is Independent of Early Risk Factors: Long-Term Follow-Up of the UKALL2003 Trial

PURPOSE

The aim of the randomized trial, UKALL2003, was to adjust treatment intensity on the basis of minimal residual disease (MRD) stratification for children and young adults with acute lymphoblastic leukemia. We analyzed the 10-year randomized outcomes and the time for patients to be considered cured (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT00222612).

METHODS

A total of 3,113 patients were analyzed including 1,054 patients who underwent random assignment (521 MRD low-risk and 533 MRD high-risk patients). Time to cure was defined as the point at which the chance of relapse was < 1%. The median follow-up time was 10.98 (interquartile range, 9.19-13.02) years, and survival rates are quoted at 10 years.

RESULTS

In the low-risk group, the event-free survival was 91.7% (95% CI, 87.4 to 94.6) with one course of delayed intensification versus 93.7% (95% CI, 89.9 to 96.1) with two delayed intensifications (adjusted hazard ratio, 0.73; 95% CI, 0.38 to 1.40; P = .3). In the high-risk group, the event-free survival was 82.1% (95% CI, 76.9 to 86.2) with standard therapy versus 87.1% (95% CI, 82.4 to 90.6) with augmented therapy (adjusted hazard ratio, 0.68; 95% CI, 0.44 to 1.06; P = .09). Cytogenetic high-risk patients treated on augmented therapy had a lower relapse risk (22.1%; 95% CI, 15.1 to 31.6) versus standard therapy (52.4%; 95% CI, 28.9 to 80.1; P = .016). The initial risk of relapse differed significantly by sex, age, MRD, and genetics, but the risk of relapse for all subgroups quickly coalesced at around 6 years after diagnosis.

CONCLUSION

Long-term outcomes of the UKALL2003 trial confirm that low-risk patients can safely de-escalate therapy, while intensified therapy benefits patients with high-risk cytogenetics. Regardless of prognosis, the time to cure is similar across risk groups. This will facilitate communication to patients and families who pose the question "When am I/is my child cured?"

The current treatment approach to adolescents and young adults with acute lymphoblastic leukemia (AYA-ALL): challenges and considerations

INTRODUCTION

AYA-ALL differs from pediatric ALL in terms of clinical, biological, psychosocial factors and access to care and has an inferior outcome. It is now being recognized that pediatric-inspired protocols are superior to adult protocols for this cohort, but given the lack of randomized trials, several questions remain unanswered.

AREAS COVERED

In this review, we discuss how AYA-ALL is different from the pediatric ALL population, compare AYA ALL with ALL in middle and older age adults, review the studies that have enrolled the AYA cohort, summarize risk-stratified and response-adapted approaches, describe the biological subtypes, and review the novel agents/approaches under evaluation.

EXPERT OPINION

AYA-ALL is a complex and challenging disease that needs multidisciplinary and focused care. Well-designed clinical trials that focus on this cohort are needed to further improve the outcomes.

Hypogammaglobulinemia in Adolescents and Young Adults with Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia

Hypogammaglobulinemia is a poorly described complication of chemotherapy in adolescents and young adults (AYAs, 15-39 years) with acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL). The majority of AYAs treated on a Berlin-Frankfurt-Munster-based ALL regimen experienced hypogammaglobulinemia (65.0% [13/20]). Febrile neutropenia episodes (throughout the treatment course) and infectious events during maintenance occurred more frequently in hypogammaglobulinemic patients compared with patients with normal immunoglobulin G levels (n = 7) (median 1.0 vs. 0.0, p = 0.02; 7.0 vs. 3.0, p = 0.02, respectively). Hypogammaglobulinemia did not impact overall or event-free survival. Further studies are needed to elucidate the etiology of hypogammaglobulinemia and to establish criteria for immunoglobulin replacement in these patients.

Pediatric-inspired protocols in adult acute lymphoblastic leukemia: are the results bearing fruit?

Observational findings demonstrating improved survival for younger adults following pediatric, as opposed to adult, acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) regimens have been translated into international, prospective multicenter clinical trials testing the pediatric regimen in young adult ALL. The results of these studies confirm the feasibility of delivering the pediatric regimen in the adult oncology setting and establish the superiority of this approach relative to historical adult cooperative group regimen results. Specific toxicities, including thrombosis, hepatotoxicity, and osteonecrosis, are more prevalent in adults receiving the pediatric regimen relative to young children. Persistent minimal residual disease (MRD) is a strong prognostic indicator in adults receiving the pediatric regimen; sensitive, high-quality MRD evaluation should be performed in all patients receiving these therapies. Incorporation of targeted agents, particularly in the frontline and MRD+ setting, will usher in the next era of the pediatric regimen in adult ALL.