Distinct subtypes of diffuse large B-cell lymphoma defined by hypermutated genes

Activation-induced cytidine deaminase causes recurrent splicing mutations in diffuse large B-cell lymphoma

Diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) is the most common lymphoma. A major mutagenic process in DLBCL is aberrant somatic hypermutation (aSHM) by activation-induced cytidine deaminase (AID), which occurs preferentially at RCH/TW sequence motifs proximal to transcription start sites. Splice sequences are highly conserved, rich in RCH/TW motifs, and recurrently mutated in DLBCL. Therefore, we hypothesized that aSHM may cause recurrent splicing mutations in DLBCL. In a meta-cohort of > 1,800 DLBCLs, we found that 77.5% of splicing mutations in 29 recurrently mutated genes followed aSHM patterns. In addition, in whole-genome sequencing (WGS) data from 153 DLBCLs, proximal mutations in splice sequences, especially in donors, were significantly enriched in RCH/TW motifs (p < 0.01). We validated this enrichment in two additional DLBCL cohorts (N > 2,000; p < 0.0001) and confirmed its absence in 12 cancer types without aSHM (N > 6,300). Comparing sequencing data from mouse models with and without AID activity showed that the splice donor sequences were the top genomic feature enriched in AID-induced mutations (p < 0.0001). Finally, we observed that most AID-related splice site mutations are clonal within a sample, indicating that aSHM may cause early loss-of-function events in lymphomagenesis. Overall, these findings support that AID causes an overrepresentation of clonal splicing mutations in DLBCL.

Clonal Relationship and Mutation Analysis in Lymphoplasmacytic Lymphoma/Waldenström Macroglobulinemia Associated With Diffuse Large B-cell Lymphoma

Patients with lymphoplasmacytic lymphoma/Waldenström macroglobulinemia (LPL/WM) occasionally develop diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL). This mostly results from LPL/WM transformation, although clonally unrelated DLBCL can also arise. LPL/WM is characterized by activating MYD88L265P (>95%) and CXCR4 mutations (~30%), but the genetic drivers of transformation remain to be identified. Here, in thirteen LPL/WM patients who developed DLBCL, the clonal relationship of LPL and DLBCL together with mutations contributing to transformation were investigated. In 2 LPL/WM patients (15%), high-throughput sequencing of immunoglobulin gene rearrangements showed evidence of >1 clonal B-cell population in LPL tissue biopsies. In the majority of LPL/WM patients, DLBCL presentations were clonally related to the dominant clone in LPL, providing evidence of transformation. However, in 3 patients (23%), DLBCL was clonally unrelated to the major malignant B-cell clone in LPL, of which 2 patients developed de novo DLBCL. In this study cohort, LPL displayed MYD88L265P mutation in 8 out of eleven patients analyzed (73%), while CXCR4 mutations were observed in 6 cases (55%). MYD88WT LPL biopsies present in 3 patients (27%) were characterized by CD79B and TNFAIP3 mutations. Upon transformation, DLBCL acquired novel mutations targeting BTG1, BTG2, CD79B, CARD11, TP53, and PIM1. Together, we demonstrate variable clonal B-cell dynamics in LPL/WM patients developing DLBCL, and the occurrence of clonally unrelated DLBCL in about one-quarter of LPL/WM patients. Moreover, we identified commonly mutated genes upon DLBCL transformation, which together with preserved mutations already present in LPL characterize the mutational landscape of DLBCL occurrences in LPL/WM patients.

Serum Paraprotein Is Associated with Adverse Prognostic Factors and Outcome, across Different Subtypes of Mature B-Cell Malignancies-A Systematic Review

The presence of a serum paraprotein (PP) is usually associated with plasma-cell dyscrasias, Waldenstrom Macroglobulinemia/lymphoplasmacytic lymphoma, and cryoglobulinemia. However, PP is also often reported in other high- and low-grade B-cell malignancies. As these reports are sparse and heterogeneous, an overall view on this topic is lacking, Therefore, we carried out a complete literature review to detail the characteristics, and highlight differences and similarities among lymphoma entities associated with PP. In these settings, IgM and IgG are the prevalent PP subtypes, and their serum concentration is often low or even undetectable without immunofixation. The relevance of paraproteinemia and its prevalence, as well as the impact of IgG vs. IgM PP, seems to differ within B-NHL subtypes and CLL. Nonetheless, paraproteinemia is almost always associated with advanced disease, as well as with immunophenotypic, genetic, and clinical features, impacting prognosis. In fact, PP is reported as an independent prognostic marker of poor outcome. All the above call for implementing clinical practice, with the assessment of paraproteinemia, in patients' work-up. Indeed, more studies are needed to shed light on the biological mechanism causing more aggressive disease. Furthermore, the significance of paraproteinemia, in the era of targeted therapies, should be assessed in prospective trials.

Blood has never been thicker: Cell-free DNA fragmentomics in the liquid biopsy toolbox of B-cell lymphomas

Liquid biopsies utilizing plasma circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) are anticipated to revolutionize decision-making in cancer care. In the field of lymphomas, ctDNA-based blood tests represent the forefront of clinically applicable tools to harness decades of genomic research for disease profiling, quantification, and detection. More recently, the discovery of nonrandom fragmentation patterns in cell-free DNA (cfDNA) has opened another avenue of liquid biopsy research beyond mutational interrogation of ctDNA. Through examination of structural features, nucleotide content, and genomic distribution of massive numbers of plasma cfDNA molecules, the study of fragmentomics aims at identifying new tools that augment existing ctDNA-based analyses and discover new ways to profile cancer from blood tests. Indeed, the characterization of aberrant lymphoma ctDNA fragment patterns and harnessing them with powerful machine-learning techniques are expected to unleash the potential of nonmutant molecules for liquid biopsy purposes. In this article, we review cfDNA fragmentomics as an emerging approach in the ctDNA research of B-cell lymphomas. We summarize the biology behind the formation of cfDNA fragment patterns and discuss the preanalytical and technical limitations faced with current methodologies. Then we go through the advances in the field of lymphomas and envision what other noninvasive tools based on fragment characteristics could be explored. Last, we place fragmentomics as one of the facets of ctDNA analyses in emerging multiview and multiomics liquid biopsies. We pay attention to the unknowns in the field of cfDNA fragmentation biology that warrant further mechanistic investigation to provide rational background for the development of these precision oncology tools and understanding of their limitations.

Application of next-generation sequencing in diffuse large B-cell lymphoma

Diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) is the most common subtype of invasive non-Hodgkin lymphoma. There is great heterogeneity in its molecular biological characteristics, clinical manifestations and prognosis. The use of rituximab has greatly improved the cure rate of DLBCL, but there are still 30% of patients with poor prognosis. In the era of precision medicine, the significance of molecular biology and genetic factors on the diagnosis, treatment and prognosis of patients has been found. Among these, next-generation sequencing technology plays an important role. This paper reviews the research progress of next-generation sequencing technology in the classification, diagnosis, prognosis and molecular targeted therapy of DLBCL.

Molecular subclusters of follicular lymphoma: a report from the United Kingdom's Haematological Malignancy Research Network

Follicular lymphoma (FL) is morphologically and clinically diverse, with mutations in epigenetic regulators alongside t(14;18) identified as disease-initiating events. Identification of additional mutational entities confirms this cancer's heterogeneity, but whether mutational data can be resolved into mechanistically distinct subsets remains an open question. Targeted sequencing was applied to an unselected population-based FL cohort (n = 548) with full clinical follow-up (n = 538), which included 96 diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) transformations. We investigated whether molecular subclusters of FL can be identified and whether mutational data provide predictive information relating to transformation. DNA extracted from FL samples was sequenced with a 293-gene panel representing genes frequently mutated in DLBCL and FL. Three clusters were resolved using mutational data alone, independent of translocation status: FL_aSHM, with high burden of aberrant somatic hypermutation (aSHM) targets; FL_STAT6, with high STAT6 & CREBBP mutation and low aSHM; and FL_Com, with the absence of features of other subtypes and enriched KMT2D mutation. Analysis of mutation signatures demonstrated differential enrichment of predicted mutation signatures between subgroups and a dominant preference in the FL_aSHM subgroup for G(C>T)T and G(C>T)C transitions consistent with previously defined aSHM-like patterns. Of transformed cases with paired samples, 17 of 26 had evidence of branching evolution. Poorer overall survival (OS) in the aSHM group (P = .04) was associated with older age; however, overall tumor genetics provided limited information to predict individual patient risk. Our approach identifies 3 molecular subclusters of FL linked to differences in underlying mechanistic pathways. These clusters, which may be further resolved by the inclusion of translocation status and wider mutation profiles, have implications for understanding pathogenesis as well as improving treatment strategies in the future.

Evidence-based review of genomic aberrations in diffuse large B cell lymphoma, not otherwise specified (DLBCL, NOS): Report from the cancer genomics consortium lymphoma working group

Diffuse large B cell lymphoma, not otherwise specified (DLBCL, NOS) is the most common type of non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL). The 2016 World Health Organization (WHO) classification defined DLBCL, NOS and its subtypes based on clinical findings, morphology, immunophenotype, and genetics. However, even within the WHO subtypes, it is clear that additional clinical and genetic heterogeneity exists. Significant efforts have been focused on utilizing advanced genomic technologies to further subclassify DLBCL, NOS into clinically relevant subtypes. These efforts have led to the implementation of novel algorithms to support optimal risk-oriented therapy and improvement in the overall survival of DLBCL patients. We gathered an international group of experts to review the current literature on DLBCL, NOS, with respect to genomic aberrations and the role they may play in the diagnosis, prognosis and therapeutic decisions. We comprehensively surveyed clinical laboratory directors/professionals about their genetic testing practices for DLBCL, NOS. The survey results indicated that a variety of diagnostic approaches were being utilized and that there was an overwhelming interest in further standardization of routine genetic testing along with the incorporation of new genetic testing modalities to help guide a precision medicine approach. Additionally, we present a comprehensive literature summary on the most clinically relevant genomic aberrations in DLBCL, NOS. Based upon the survey results and literature review, we propose a standardized, tiered testing approach which will help laboratories optimize genomic testing in order to provide the maximum information to guide patient care.

Clinical implications of circulating tumor DNA in predicting the outcome of diffuse large B cell lymphoma patients receiving first-line therapy

BACKGROUND

Circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) has been proven to be a promising tumor-specific biomarker in solid tumors, but its clinical utility in risk stratification and early prediction of relapse for diffuse large B cell lymphoma (DLBCL) has not been well explored.

METHODS

Here, using a lymphoma-specific sequencing panel, we assessed the prognostic and predictive utilities of ctDNA measurements before, during, and after first-line therapy in 73 Chinese DLBCL patients.

RESULTS

The pretreatment ctDNA level serving as an independent prognostic factor for both progression-free survival (PFS, adjusted HR 2.47; p = 0.004) and overall survival (OS, adjusted HR 2.49; p = 0.011) was confirmed in our cohort. Furthermore, the patients classified as molecular responders who presented a larger decrease in ctDNA levels after the initial two treatment cycles had more favorable PFS (unreached vs. 6.25 months; HR 5.348; p = 0.0015) and OS (unreached vs. 25.87; HR 4.0; p = 0.028) than non-responders. In addition, interim ctDNA clearance may be an alternative noninvasive method of positron emission tomography and computed tomography (PET-CT) for predicting better PFS (HR 3.65; p = 0.0033) and OS (HR 3.536; p = 0.016). We also demonstrated that posttreatment ctDNA was a sensitive indicator for detecting minimal residual disease (MRD) in patients with a high risk of recurrence (HR 6.471; p = 0.014), who were otherwise claimed to achieve radiographic CR (complete remission).

CONCLUSIONS

CtDNA is a promising noninvasive tool for prognosis prediction, response assessment, and early relapse prediction of first-line treatment in DLBCL patients.

Mutation profiling of circulating tumor DNA identifies distinct mutation patterns in non-Hodgkin lymphoma

OBJECTIVE

Circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) is emerging as a versatile biomarker for noninvasive genotyping and response monitoring in specific B-cell lymphomas; however, few studies have been conducted to explore ctDNA-based mutation profiling across non-Hodgkin lymphomas (NHLs) and genomic changes after initiation of chemotherapy.

METHODS

A targeted sequencing of 362 genes was performed to detect the mutation profiles in paired blood and tissue samples from 42 NHL patients. Genomic alterations were explored in 11 diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) patients using paired blood samples collected pre- and post-R-CHOP chemotherapy.

RESULTS

The frequencies of PIM1, MYD88, MYC, ZNF292, JAK, and MAF mutations were higher in aggressive than in indolent B-cell lymphoma and NK/T subtypes. Tumor mutation burden in blood samples was higher in aggressive than in indolent B-cell lymphomas and higher in patients who progressed than in those who responded to treatments. Our data also revealed significant enhance of concordance index through integrating mutated genes that were significantly associated with prognosis into International Prognostic Index-based prognostic model. Moreover, acquisition of mutations such as PCLO_p.L1220Tfs*3 was associated with resistance to R-CHOP in DLBCL patients.

CONCLUSIONS

Our findings illustrated distinct mutation patterns across various NHL subtypes and suggested the association of genomic alterations in ctDNA with treatment outcomes.

Molecular features encoded in the ctDNA reveal heterogeneity and predict outcome in high-risk aggressive B-cell lymphoma

Inadequate molecular and clinical stratification of the patients with high-risk diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) is a clinical challenge hampering the establishment of personalized therapeutic options. We studied the translational significance of liquid biopsy in a uniformly treated trial cohort. Pretreatment circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) revealed hidden clinical and biological heterogeneity, and high ctDNA burden determined increased risk of relapse and death independently of conventional risk factors. Genomic dissection of pretreatment ctDNA revealed translationally relevant phenotypic, molecular, and prognostic information that extended beyond diagnostic tissue biopsies. During therapy, chemorefractory lymphomas exhibited diverging ctDNA kinetics, whereas end-of-therapy negativity for minimal residual disease characterized cured patients and resolved clinical enigmas, including false residual PET positivity. Furthermore, we discovered fragmentation disparities in the cell-free DNA that characterize lymphoma-derived ctDNA and, as a proof-of-concept for their clinical application, utilized machine learning to show that end-of-therapy fragmentation patterns predict outcome. Altogether, we have discovered novel molecular determinants in the liquid biopsy that can non-invasively guide treatment decisions.

Molecular profiling in diffuse large B-cell lymphoma: why so many types of subtypes?

The term diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) includes a heterogeneous collection of biologically distinct tumours. This heterogeneity currently presents a barrier to the successful deployment of novel, biologically targeted therapies. Molecular profiling studies have recently proposed new molecular classification systems. These have the potential to resolve the biological heterogeneity of DLBCL into manageable subgroups of tumours that rely on shared oncogenic programmes. In many cases these biological programmes straddle the boundaries of our existing systems for classifying B-cell lymphomas. Here we review the findings from these major molecular profiling studies with a specific focus on those that propose new genetic subgroups of DLBCL. We highlight the areas of consensus and discordance between these studies and discuss the implications for current clinical practice and for clinical trials. Finally, we address the outstanding challenges and solutions to the introduction of genomic subtyping and precision medicine in DLBCL.

Prognostic molecular biomarkers in diffuse large B-cell lymphoma in the rituximab era and their therapeutic implications

Diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) represents a group of tumors characterized by substantial heterogeneity in terms of their pathological and biological features, a causal factor of their varied clinical outcome. This variation has persisted despite the implementation of rituximab in treatment regimens over the last 20 years. In this context, prognostic biomarkers are of great importance in order to identify high-risk patients that might benefit from treatment intensification or the introduction of novel therapeutic agents. Herein, we review current knowledge on specific immunohistochemical or genetic biomarkers that might be useful in clinical practice. Gene-expression profiling is a tool of special consideration in this effort, as it has enriched our understanding of DLBCL biology and has allowed for the classification of DLBCL by cell-of-origin as well as by more elaborate molecular signatures based on distinct gene-expression profiles. These subgroups might outperform individual biomarkers in terms of prognostication; however, their use in clinical practice is still limited. Moreover, the underappreciated role of the tumor microenvironment in DLBCL prognosis is discussed in terms of prognostic gene-expression signatures, as well as in terms of individual biomarkers of prognostic significance. Finally, the efficacy of novel therapeutic agents for the treatment of DLBCL patients are discussed and an evidence-based therapeutic approach by specific genetic subgroup is suggested.

Comprehensive Characterization of Cachexia-Inducing Factors in Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma Reveals a Molecular Subtype and a Prognosis-Related Signature

Background

Cachexia is defined as an involuntary decrease in body weight, which can increase the risk of death in cancer patients and reduce the quality of life. Cachexia-inducing factors (CIFs) have been reported in colorectal cancer and pancreatic adenocarcinoma, but their value in diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) requires further genetic research.

Methods

We used gene expression data from Gene Expression Omnibus to evaluate the expression landscape of 25 known CIFs in DLBCL patients and compared them with normal lymphoma tissues from two cohorts [GSE56315 (n = 88) and GSE12195 (n = 136)]. The mutational status of CIFs were also evaluated in The Cancer Genome Atlas database. Based on the expression profiles of 25 CIFs, a single exploratory dataset which was merged by the datasets of GSE10846 (n = 420) and GSE31312 (n = 498) were divided into two molecular subtypes by using the method of consensus clustering. Immune microenvironment between different subtypes were assessed via single-sample gene set enrichment analysis and the CIBERSORT algorithm. The treatment response of commonly used chemotherapeutic drugs was predicted and gene set variation analysis was utilized to reveal the divergence in activated pathways for distinct subtypes. A risk signature was derived by univariate Cox regression and LASSO regression in the merged dataset (n = 882), and two independent cohorts [GSE87371 (n = 221) and GSE32918 (n = 244)] were used for validation, respectively.

Results

Clustering analysis with CIFs further divided the cases into two molecular subtypes (cluster A and cluster B) associated with distinct prognosis, immunological landscape, chemosensitivity, and biological process. A risk-prognostic signature based on CCL2, CSF2, IL15, IL17A, IL4, TGFA, and TNFSF10 for DLBCL was developed, and significant differences in overall survival analysis were found between the low- and high-risk groups in the training dataset and another two independent validation datasets. Multivariate regression showed that the risk signature was an independently prognostic factor in contrast to other clinical characteristics.

Conclusion

This study demonstrated that CIFs further contribute to the observed heterogeneity of DLBCL, and molecular classification and a risk signature based on CIFs are both promising tools for prognostic stratification, which may provide important clues for precision medicine and tumor-targeted therapy.

Genomic characterisation of diffuse large B-cell lymphoma

Diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) is a genomically heterogenous disease comprised of many subtypes that display significantly different clinical outcomes, in the context of treatment with conventional immunochemotherapy. Poor clinical outcomes in some subtypes, and imperfect identification of high risk individuals in otherwise low risk subgroups, demonstrate there is room for improvement in the subclassification and risk stratification of DLBCL. In addition, more comprehensive profiling may lead to improved molecular testing guided treatment selection. Existing characterisation and risk stratification strategies, such as division of DLBCL into activated B-cell (ABC) and germinal centre B-cell (GCB) subtypes, although prognostically useful, may oversimplify the underlying biology and have proven to be less useful in improving therapy selection. Several groups have proposed more predictive molecular testing based prognostic models with potentially more relevance to therapy choice. These alternative approaches use more resource intensive comprehensive genomic profiling strategies which present practical challenges to implement in diagnostic laboratories. The addition of genomic testing to the subclassification of DLBCL shows promise, but laboratories must identify testing strategies relevant to clinical practice. A consensus on optimal molecular profiling techniques is yet to be achieved. In this article we review various next generation sequencing-based analytical techniques and molecular classification models proposed recently. Emerging therapeutics where molecular profiling may guide patient selection are also reviewed. The potential utility of genomic testing in DLBCL is discussed, in addition to practical considerations when considering introducing genomics into the diagnostic laboratory.

Circulating RNA biomarkers in diffuse large B-cell lymphoma: a systematic review

Diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) is the most common histological subtype of non-Hodgkin's lymphomas (NHL). DLBCL is an aggressive malignancy that displays a great heterogeneity in terms of morphology, genetics and biological behavior. While a sustained complete remission is obtained in the majority of patients with standard immunochemotherapy, patients with refractory of relapsed disease after first-line treatment have a poor prognosis. This patient group represents an important unmet need in lymphoma treatment. In recent years, improved understanding of the underlying molecular pathogenesis had led to new classification and prognostication tools, including the development of cell-free biomarkers in liquid biopsies. Although the majority of studies have focused on the use of cell-free fragments of DNA (cfDNA), there has been an increased interest in circulating-free coding and non-coding RNA, including messenger RNA (mRNA), microRNA (miRNA), long non-coding RNA (lncRNA) and circular RNA (circRNA), as well as RNA encapsulated in extracellular vesicles or tumor-educated platelets (TEPs). We performed a systematic search in PubMed to identify articles that evaluated circulating RNA as diagnostic, subtype, treatment response or prognostic biomarkers in a human DLBCL population. A total of 35 articles met the inclusion criteria. The aim of this systematic review is to present the current understanding of circulating RNA molecules as biomarker in DLBCL and to discuss their future potential.

Biomarkers and novel therapeutic approaches for diffuse large B-cell lymphoma in the era of precision medicine

Despite the great efforts for better treatment options for diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) (most common form of non-Hodgkin lymphoma, NHL) to treat and prevent relapse, it continues to be a challenge. Here, we present an overview of DLBCL and address the diagnostic assays and molecular techniques used in its diagnosis, role of biomarkers in detection, treatment of early and advanced stage DLBCL, and novel drug regimens. We discuss the significant biomarkers that have emerged as essential tools for stratifying patients according to risk factors and for providing insights into the use of more targeted and individualized therapeutics. We discuss techniques such as gene expression studies, including next-generation sequencing, which have enabled a more understanding of the complex pathogenesis of DLBCL and have helped determine molecular targets for novel therapeutic agents. We examine current treatment approaches, outline the findings of completed clinical trials, and provide updates for ongoing clinical trials. We highlight clinical trials relevant to the significant fraction of DLBCL patients who present with complex cases marked by high relapse rates. Supported by an increased understanding of targetable pathways in DLBCL, clinical trials involving specialized combination therapies are bringing us within reach the promise of an effective cure to DLBCL using precision medicine. Optimization of therapy remains a crucial objective, with the end goal being a balance between high survival rates through targeted and personalized treatment while reducing adverse effects in DLBCL patients of all subsets.

Oncogenic Mutations of MYD88 and CD79B in Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma and Implications for Clinical Practice

Diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) is the most common non-Hodgkin's lymphoma in adults. Despite the recognition of transcriptional subtypes with distinct functional characteristics, patient outcomes have not been substantially altered since the advent of chemoimmunotherapy (CIT) twenty years ago. Recently, a few pivotal studies added to the disease heterogeneity by describing several activating mutations, which have been associated with disease presentation, B-cell function and behavior, and final outcome. DLBCL arises from antigen exposed B-cells, with the B-cell receptor (BCR) playing a central role. BCR-activity related mutations, such as CD79B and MYD88, are responsible for chronic activation of the BCR in a substantial subset of patients. These mutations, often coexisting in the same patient, have been found in a substantial subset of patients with immune-privileged (IP) sites DLBCLs, and are drivers of lymphoma development conferring tissue-specific homing properties. Both mutations have been associated with disease behavior, including tumor response either to CIT or to BCR-targeted therapy. The recognition of CD79B and MYD88 mutations will contribute to the heterogeneity of the disease, both in recognizing the BCR as a potential therapeutic target and in providing genetic tools for personalized treatment.

Molecular Complexity of Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma: Can It Be a Roadmap for Precision Medicine?

Diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) is the most common non-Hodgkin lymphoma; it features extreme molecular heterogeneity regardless of the classical cell-of-origin (COO) classification. Despite this, the standard therapeutic approach is still immunochemotherapy (rituximab plus cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, and prednisone-R-CHOP), which allows a 60% overall survival (OS) rate, but up to 40% of patients experience relapse or refractory (R/R) disease. With the purpose of searching for new clinical parameters and biomarkers helping to make a better DLBCL patient characterization and stratification, in the last years a series of large discovery genomic and transcriptomic studies has been conducted, generating a wealth of information that needs to be put in order. We reviewed these researches, trying ultimately to understand if there are bases offering a roadmap toward personalized and precision medicine also for DLBCL.