1
|
Salwender H, Weinhold N, Benner A, Miah K, Merz M, Haenel M, Jehn C, Mai E, Menis E, Blau I, Scheid C, Hose D, Seckinger A, Luntz S, Besemer B, Munder M, Brossart P, Glass B, Lindemann HW, Weisel K, Hanoun C, Schnitzler P, Klemm S, Goldschmidt H, Raab M, Elmaagacli A. Cytomegalovirus immunoglobulin serology prevalence in patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma treated within the GMMG-MM5 phase III trial. Hematology 2024; 29:2320006. [PMID: 38407192 DOI: 10.1080/16078454.2024.2320006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/14/2023] [Accepted: 02/07/2024] [Indexed: 02/27/2024] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVES The seroprevalence of antibodies against Cytomegalovirus (CMV) is an established poor prognostic factor for patients receiving an allogeneic stem cell transplantation. However, the impact of CMV serology on outcome after autologous stem cell transplantation remains unknown. METHODS Here, we analyzed the CMV immunoglobulin (Ig) serology of 446 newly-diagnosed multiple myeloma (MM) patients of the GMMG-MM5 phase III trial with a median follow-up of 58 months. RESULTS CMV IgG and IgM positivity was seen in 51% and 6% of the patients, respectively. In multivariate analysis CMV IgG and CMV IgM serology show an age-depending effect for PFS. We identified positive CMV IgG/positive CMV IgM serology as an age-depending beneficial factor on PFS. DISCUSSION Younger patients with a positive CMV IgG/positive CMV IgM serology experienced a favorable effect on PFS, whereas a positive CMV IgG/positive CMV IgM serology at older age has a disadvantageous effect on PFS.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hans Salwender
- Department of Oncology and Hematology, Asklepios Hospital Hamburg Altona, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Niels Weinhold
- Department of Oncology and Hematology, Medizinische Klinik Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Axel Benner
- Division of Biostatistics, German Cancer Research Center, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Kaya Miah
- Division of Biostatistics, German Cancer Research Center, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Maximilian Merz
- Department of Hematology and Cell Therapy, University Hospital Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany
| | - Mathias Haenel
- Department of Oncology and Hematology, Klinikum Chemnitz, Chemnitz, Germany
| | - Christian Jehn
- Department of Hematology/Oncology and Stem Cell Transplantation, AK St. Georg, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Elias Mai
- Department of Oncology and Hematology, Medizinische Klinik Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Ekaterina Menis
- Department of Oncology and Hematology, Medizinische Klinik Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Igor Blau
- Department of Oncology and Hematology, Charité Universitätsmedizin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Christof Scheid
- Department of Oncology and Hematology, University Hospital Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - Dirk Hose
- Laboratory of Hematology and Immunology & Labor für Myelomforschung, Vrije Universiteit Brussel (VUB), Jette, Belgium
| | - Anja Seckinger
- Laboratory of Hematology and Immunology & Labor für Myelomforschung, Vrije Universiteit Brussel (VUB), Jette, Belgium
| | - Steffen Luntz
- Department of Oncology and Hematology, Coordination Centre for Clinical Trials (KKS), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Britta Besemer
- Department of Oncology and Hematology, University Hospital Tubingen, Tubingen, Germany
| | - Markus Munder
- Department of Oncology and Hematology, University Medical Center Mainz, Mainz, Germany
| | - Peter Brossart
- Department of Oncology and Hematology, University Hospital Bonn, Bonn, Germany
| | - Bertram Glass
- Department of Oncology and Hematology, Helios Hospital Berlin Buch, Buch, Germany
| | | | - Katja Weisel
- Department of Oncology and Hematology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Christine Hanoun
- Department of Oncology and Hematology, University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany
| | - Paul Schnitzler
- Zentrum für Infektiologie, Virologie Universitätsklinikum Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Sarah Klemm
- Zentrum für Infektiologie, Virologie Universitätsklinikum Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Hartmut Goldschmidt
- Department of Oncology and Hematology, Medizinische Klinik Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
- Department of Oncology and Hematology, National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Marc Raab
- Department of Oncology and Hematology, Medizinische Klinik Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Ahmet Elmaagacli
- Department of Hematology/Oncology and Stem Cell Transplantation, AK St. Georg, Hamburg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Sachpekidis C, Enqvist O, Ulén J, Kopp-Schneider A, Pan L, Mai EK, Hajiyianni M, Merz M, Raab MS, Jauch A, Goldschmidt H, Edenbrandt L, Dimitrakopoulou-Strauss A. Artificial intelligence-based, volumetric assessment of the bone marrow metabolic activity in [ 18F]FDG PET/CT predicts survival in multiple myeloma. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 2024; 51:2293-2307. [PMID: 38456971 PMCID: PMC11178614 DOI: 10.1007/s00259-024-06668-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/18/2023] [Accepted: 02/25/2024] [Indexed: 03/09/2024]
Abstract
PURPOSE Multiple myeloma (MM) is a highly heterogeneous disease with wide variations in patient outcome. [18F]FDG PET/CT can provide prognostic information in MM, but it is hampered by issues regarding standardization of scan interpretation. Our group has recently demonstrated the feasibility of automated, volumetric assessment of bone marrow (BM) metabolic activity on PET/CT using a novel artificial intelligence (AI)-based tool. Accordingly, the aim of the current study is to investigate the prognostic role of whole-body calculations of BM metabolism in patients with newly diagnosed MM using this AI tool. MATERIALS AND METHODS Forty-four, previously untreated MM patients underwent whole-body [18F]FDG PET/CT. Automated PET/CT image segmentation and volumetric quantification of BM metabolism were based on an initial CT-based segmentation of the skeleton, its transfer to the standardized uptake value (SUV) PET images, subsequent application of different SUV thresholds, and refinement of the resulting regions using postprocessing. In the present analysis, ten different uptake thresholds (AI approaches), based on reference organs or absolute SUV values, were applied for definition of pathological tracer uptake and subsequent calculation of the whole-body metabolic tumor volume (MTV) and total lesion glycolysis (TLG). Correlation analysis was performed between the automated PET values and histopathological results of the BM as well as patients' progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis was used to investigate the discrimination performance of MTV and TLG for prediction of 2-year PFS. The prognostic performance of the new Italian Myeloma criteria for PET Use (IMPeTUs) was also investigated. RESULTS Median follow-up [95% CI] of the patient cohort was 110 months [105-123 months]. AI-based BM segmentation and calculation of MTV and TLG were feasible in all patients. A significant, positive, moderate correlation was observed between the automated quantitative whole-body PET/CT parameters, MTV and TLG, and BM plasma cell infiltration for all ten [18F]FDG uptake thresholds. With regard to PFS, univariable analysis for both MTV and TLG predicted patient outcome reasonably well for all AI approaches. Adjusting for cytogenetic abnormalities and BM plasma cell infiltration rate, multivariable analysis also showed prognostic significance for high MTV, which defined pathological [18F]FDG uptake in the BM via the liver. In terms of OS, univariable and multivariable analysis showed that whole-body MTV, again mainly using liver uptake as reference, was significantly associated with shorter survival. In line with these findings, ROC curve analysis showed that MTV and TLG, assessed using liver-based cut-offs, could predict 2-year PFS rates. The application of IMPeTUs showed that the number of focal hypermetabolic BM lesions and extramedullary disease had an adverse effect on PFS. CONCLUSIONS The AI-based, whole-body calculations of BM metabolism via the parameters MTV and TLG not only correlate with the degree of BM plasma cell infiltration, but also predict patient survival in MM. In particular, the parameter MTV, using the liver uptake as reference for BM segmentation, provides solid prognostic information for disease progression. In addition to highlighting the prognostic significance of automated, global volumetric estimation of metabolic tumor burden, these data open up new perspectives towards solving the complex problem of interpreting PET scans in MM with a simple, fast, and robust method that is not affected by operator-dependent interventions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Christos Sachpekidis
- Clinical Cooperation Unit Nuclear Medicine, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Im Neuenheimer Feld 280, 69210, Heidelberg, Germany.
| | - Olof Enqvist
- Eigenvision AB, Malmö, Sweden
- Department of Electrical Engineering, Chalmers University of Technology, Gothenburg, Sweden
| | | | | | - Leyun Pan
- Clinical Cooperation Unit Nuclear Medicine, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Im Neuenheimer Feld 280, 69210, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Elias K Mai
- Department of Internal Medicine V, University Hospital Heidelberg and National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Marina Hajiyianni
- Department of Internal Medicine V, University Hospital Heidelberg and National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Maximilian Merz
- Department of Hematology and Cell Therapy, University of Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany
| | - Marc S Raab
- Department of Internal Medicine V, University Hospital Heidelberg and National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Anna Jauch
- Institute of Human Genetics, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Hartmut Goldschmidt
- Department of Internal Medicine V, University Hospital Heidelberg and National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Lars Edenbrandt
- Department of Clinical Physiology, Region Västra Götaland, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Gothenburg, Sweden
- Department of Molecular and Clinical Medicine, Institute of Medicine, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden
| | - Antonia Dimitrakopoulou-Strauss
- Clinical Cooperation Unit Nuclear Medicine, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Im Neuenheimer Feld 280, 69210, Heidelberg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Hwang A, Hayden P, Pawlyn C, McLornan D, Garderet L. The role of maintenance therapy following autologous stem cell transplantation in newly diagnosed multiple myeloma: Considerations on behalf of the Chronic Malignancies Working Party of the EBMT. Br J Haematol 2024; 204:1159-1175. [PMID: 38390784 DOI: 10.1111/bjh.19353] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/01/2023] [Revised: 01/22/2024] [Accepted: 02/12/2024] [Indexed: 02/24/2024]
Abstract
Recent treatment advancements in multiple myeloma have led to significant improvements in patient outcomes. Maintenance therapy following autologous haematopoietic stem cell transplantation (AHCT) is now standard of care and has been demonstrated to prolong and deepen treatment responses. Currently, lenalidomide remains the single agent that has been approved for maintenance post-AHCT in Europe and the USA which, if tolerated, is continued until disease progression. The treatment landscape is rapidly expanding however, and the optimal personalised maintenance approach for a patient is becoming more complex. Treatment outcomes for patients with high-risk disease remain poor and choice of maintenance in this population also remains unclear. This review article evaluates up-to-date literature regarding established maintenance approaches. It further analyses ongoing studies exploring maintenance regimens using combination and novel agents, approaches to maintenance in patients with cytogenetic high-risk disease and minimal residual disease response-adapted strategies that reflect the current evolving treatment paradigm.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Angela Hwang
- Department of Haematology, University College London Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Patrick Hayden
- Department of Haematology, St James's Hospital, Dublin, Ireland
| | | | - Donal McLornan
- Department of Haematology, University College London Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Laurent Garderet
- Département d'Hématologie, Hôpital Pitié Salpêtrière, AP-HP, Paris, France
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Mai EK, Hielscher T, Bertsch U, Salwender HJ, Zweegman S, Raab MS, Munder M, Pantani L, Mancuso K, Brossart P, Beksac M, Blau IW, Dürig J, Besemer B, Fenk R, Reimer P, van der Holt B, Hänel M, von Metzler I, Graeven U, Müller-Tidow C, Boccadoro M, Scheid C, Dimopoulos MA, Hillengass J, Weisel KC, Cavo M, Sonneveld P, Goldschmidt H. Predictors of early morbidity and mortality in newly diagnosed multiple myeloma: data from five randomized, controlled, phase III trials in 3700 patients. Leukemia 2024; 38:640-647. [PMID: 38062124 PMCID: PMC10912032 DOI: 10.1038/s41375-023-02105-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/28/2023] [Revised: 11/16/2023] [Accepted: 11/24/2023] [Indexed: 01/10/2024]
Abstract
Early morbidity and mortality affect patient outcomes in multiple myeloma. Thus, we dissected the incidence and causes of morbidity/mortality during induction therapy (IT) for newly diagnosed multiple myeloma (NDMM), and developed/validated a predictive risk score. We evaluated 3700 transplant-eligible NDMM patients treated in 2005-2020 with novel agent-based triplet/quadruplet IT. Primary endpoints were severe infections, death, or a combination of both. Patients were divided in a training (n = 1333) and three validation cohorts (n = 2367). During IT, 11.8%, 1.8%, and 12.5% of patients in the training cohort experienced severe infections, death, or both, respectively. Four major, baseline risk factors for severe infection/death were identified: low platelet count (<150/nL), ISS III, higher WHO performance status (>1), and age (>60 years). A risk score (1 risk factor=1 point) stratified patients in low (39.5%; 0 points), intermediate (41.9%; 1 point), and high (18.6%; ≥2 points) risk. The risk for severe infection/death increased from 7.7% vs. 11.5% vs. 23.3% in the low- vs. intermediate- vs. high-risk groups (p < 0.001). The risk score was independently validated in three trials incorporating quadruplet IT with an anti-CD38 antibody. Our analyses established a robust and easy-to-use score to identify NDMM patients at risk of severe infection/death, covering the latest quadruplet induction therapies. Trial registrations: HOVON-65/GMMG-HD4: EudraCT No. 2004-000944-26. GMMG-MM5: EudraCT No. 2010-019173-16. GMMG-HD6: NCT02495922. EMN02/HOVON-95: NCT01208766. GMMG-HD7: NCT03617731.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Elias K Mai
- Department of Internal Medicine V, University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany.
| | - Thomas Hielscher
- Division of Biostatistics, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Uta Bertsch
- Department of Internal Medicine V, University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
- National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT) Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Hans J Salwender
- Tumorzentrum Asklepios Hamburg, AK Altona and AK St. Georg, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Sonja Zweegman
- Department of Hematology, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | - Marc S Raab
- Department of Internal Medicine V, University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Markus Munder
- Department of Internal Medicine III, University Medical Center Mainz, Mainz, Germany
| | - Lucia Pantani
- IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna, Istituto di Ematologia "Seràgnoli", Dipartimento di Medicina Specialistica, Diagnostica e Sperimentale, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna, Università di Bologna, Bologna, Italy
| | - Katia Mancuso
- IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna, Istituto di Ematologia "Seràgnoli", Dipartimento di Medicina Specialistica, Diagnostica e Sperimentale, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna, Università di Bologna, Bologna, Italy
| | - Peter Brossart
- Department of Internal Medicine III, University Hospital Bonn, Bonn, Germany
| | - Meral Beksac
- Department of Hematology, Ankara University School of Medicine, Ankara, Turkey
| | - Igor W Blau
- Medical Clinic, Charité University Medicine Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Jan Dürig
- Department of Hematology, University Clinic Essen, Essen, Germany
| | - Britta Besemer
- Department of Hematology, Oncology and Immunology, University Hospital Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany
| | - Roland Fenk
- Department of Hematology, Oncology and Clinical Immunology, University Hospital Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany
| | - Peter Reimer
- Klinik für Hämatologie, Evangelische Kliniken Essen Mitte, Evangelisches Krankenhaus Essen-Werden, Essen, Germany
| | - Bronno van der Holt
- HOVON Data Center, Department of Hematology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, Netherlands
| | - Mathias Hänel
- Department of Internal Medicine III, Klinikum Chemnitz, Chemnitz, Germany
| | - Ivana von Metzler
- Medical Clinic II, University Hospital Frankfurt am Main, Frankfurt am Main, Germany
| | - Ullrich Graeven
- Department of Internal Medicine I, Hospital Maria Hilf GmbH, Mönchengladbach, Germany
| | - Carsten Müller-Tidow
- Department of Internal Medicine V, University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Mario Boccadoro
- Myeloma Unit, Division of Hematology, University of Torino, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Città della Salute e della Scienza di Torino, Turin, Italy
| | - Christof Scheid
- Department of Internal Medicine I, University Hospital Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - Meletios A Dimopoulos
- Department of Clinical Therapeutics, School of Medicine, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece
| | | | - Katja C Weisel
- Department of Oncology, Hematology and Bone Marrow Transplantation with Section of Pneumology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Michele Cavo
- IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna, Istituto di Ematologia "Seràgnoli", Dipartimento di Medicina Specialistica, Diagnostica e Sperimentale, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna, Università di Bologna, Bologna, Italy
| | - Pieter Sonneveld
- Department of Hematology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, Netherlands
| | - Hartmut Goldschmidt
- Department of Internal Medicine V, University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
- National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT) Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Emde-Rajaratnam M, Beck S, Benes V, Salwender H, Bertsch U, Scheid C, Hänel M, Weisel K, Hielscher T, Raab MS, Goldschmidt H, Jauch A, Maes K, De Bruyne E, Menu E, De Veirman K, Moreaux J, Vanderkerken K, Seckinger A, Hose D. RNA-sequencing based first choice of treatment and determination of risk in multiple myeloma. Front Immunol 2023; 14:1286700. [PMID: 38035078 PMCID: PMC10684778 DOI: 10.3389/fimmu.2023.1286700] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/31/2023] [Accepted: 10/30/2023] [Indexed: 12/02/2023] Open
Abstract
Background Immunotherapeutic targets in multiple myeloma (MM) have variable expression height and are partly expressed in subfractions of patients only. With increasing numbers of available compounds, strategies for appropriate choice of targets (combinations) are warranted. Simultaneously, risk assessment is advisable as patient's life expectancy varies between months and decades. Methods We first assess feasibility of RNA-sequencing in a multicenter trial (GMMG-MM5, n=604 patients). Next, we use a clinical routine cohort of untreated symptomatic myeloma patients undergoing autologous stem cell transplantation (n=535, median follow-up (FU) 64 months) to perform RNA-sequencing, gene expression profiling (GEP), and iFISH by ten-probe panel on CD138-purified malignant plasma cells. We subsequently compare target expression to plasma cell precursors, MGUS (n=59), asymptomatic (n=142) and relapsed (n=69) myeloma patients, myeloma cell lines (n=26), and between longitudinal samples (MM vs. relapsed MM). Data are validated using the independent MMRF CoMMpass-cohort (n=767, FU 31 months). Results RNA-sequencing is feasible in 90.8% of patients (GMMG-MM5). Actionable immune-oncological targets (n=19) can be divided in those expressed in all normal and >99% of MM-patients (CD38, SLAMF7, BCMA, GPRC5D, FCRH5, TACI, CD74, CD44, CD37, CD79B), those with expression loss in subfractions of MM-patients (BAFF-R [81.3%], CD19 [57.9%], CD20 [82.8%], CD22 [28.4%]), aberrantly expressed in MM (NY-ESO1/2 [12%], MUC1 [12.7%], CD30 [4.9%], mutated BRAF V600E/K [2.1%]), and resistance-conveying target-mutations e.g., against part but not all BCMA-directed treatments. Risk is assessable regarding proliferation, translated GEP- (UAMS70-, SKY92-, RS-score) and de novo (LfM-HRS) defined risk scores. LfM-HRS delineates three groups of 40%, 38%, and 22% of patients with 5-year and 12-year survival rates of 84% (49%), 67% (18%), and 32% (0%). R-ISS and RNA-sequencing identify partially overlapping patient populations, with R-ISS missing, e.g., 30% (22/72) of highly proliferative myeloma. Conclusion RNA-sequencing based assessment of risk and targets for first choice treatment is possible in clinical routine.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Martina Emde-Rajaratnam
- Department of Hematology and Immunology, Myeloma Center Brussels & Labor für Myelomforschung, Vrije Universiteit Brussel (VUB), Jette, Belgium
| | - Susanne Beck
- Department of Hematology and Immunology, Myeloma Center Brussels & Labor für Myelomforschung, Vrije Universiteit Brussel (VUB), Jette, Belgium
- Universitätsklinikum Heidelberg, Molekularpathologisches Zentrum, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Vladimir Benes
- Europäisches Laboratorium für Molekularbiologie, GeneCore, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Hans Salwender
- Asklepios Tumorzentrum Hamburg, AK Altona and St. Georg, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Uta Bertsch
- Universitätsklinikum Heidelberg, Medizinische Klinik V, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Christoph Scheid
- Department I of Internal Medicine, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - Mathias Hänel
- Department of Internal Medicine III, Klinikum Chemnitz GmbH, Chemnitz, Germany
| | - Katja Weisel
- Department of Oncology, Hematology and Bone Marrow Transplantation with Section of Pneumology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Thomas Hielscher
- Deutsches Krebsforschungszentrum, Abteilung für Biostatistik, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Marc S. Raab
- Universitätsklinikum Heidelberg, Medizinische Klinik V, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Hartmut Goldschmidt
- Universitätsklinikum Heidelberg, Medizinische Klinik V, Heidelberg, Germany
- Nationales Centrum für Tumorerkrankungen, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Anna Jauch
- Universität Heidelberg, Institut für Humangenetik, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Ken Maes
- Department of Hematology and Immunology, Myeloma Center Brussels & Labor für Myelomforschung, Vrije Universiteit Brussel (VUB), Jette, Belgium
| | - Elke De Bruyne
- Department of Hematology and Immunology, Myeloma Center Brussels & Labor für Myelomforschung, Vrije Universiteit Brussel (VUB), Jette, Belgium
| | - Eline Menu
- Department of Hematology and Immunology, Myeloma Center Brussels & Labor für Myelomforschung, Vrije Universiteit Brussel (VUB), Jette, Belgium
| | - Kim De Veirman
- Department of Hematology and Immunology, Myeloma Center Brussels & Labor für Myelomforschung, Vrije Universiteit Brussel (VUB), Jette, Belgium
| | - Jérôme Moreaux
- Institute of Human Genetics, UMR 9002 CNRS-UM, Montpellier, France
| | - Karin Vanderkerken
- Department of Hematology and Immunology, Myeloma Center Brussels & Labor für Myelomforschung, Vrije Universiteit Brussel (VUB), Jette, Belgium
| | - Anja Seckinger
- Department of Hematology and Immunology, Myeloma Center Brussels & Labor für Myelomforschung, Vrije Universiteit Brussel (VUB), Jette, Belgium
| | - Dirk Hose
- Department of Hematology and Immunology, Myeloma Center Brussels & Labor für Myelomforschung, Vrije Universiteit Brussel (VUB), Jette, Belgium
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Fazio M, Del Fabro V, Parrinello NL, Allegra A, Markovic U, Botta C, Accardi F, Vincelli ID, Leotta S, Elia F, Esposito B, Garibaldi B, Sapuppo G, Orofino A, Romano A, Palumbo GA, Di Raimondo F, Conticello C. Multiple Myeloma in 2023 Ways: From Trials to Real Life. Curr Oncol 2023; 30:9710-9733. [PMID: 37999125 PMCID: PMC10670159 DOI: 10.3390/curroncol30110705] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/30/2023] [Revised: 10/27/2023] [Accepted: 11/01/2023] [Indexed: 11/25/2023] Open
Abstract
Multiple myeloma is a chronic hematologic malignancy that obstinately tends to relapse. Basic research has made giant strides in better characterizing the molecular mechanisms of the disease. The results have led to the manufacturing of new, revolutionary drugs which have been widely tested in clinical trials. These drugs have been approved and are now part of the therapeutic armamentarium. As a consequence, it is essential to combine what we know from clinical trials with real-world data in order to improve therapeutic strategies. Starting with this premise, our review aims to describe the currently employed regimens in multiple myeloma and compare clinical trials with real-life experiences. We also intend to put a spotlight on promising therapies such as T-cell engagers and chimeric antigen receptor T-cells (CAR-T) which are proving to be effective in changing the course of advanced-stage disease.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Manlio Fazio
- Post-Graduation School of Haematology, University of Catania, A.O.U. ‘Policlinico-San Marco’, 95123 Catania, Italy; (M.F.); (B.E.); (B.G.); (G.S.); (A.O.); (F.D.R.)
| | - Vittorio Del Fabro
- Division of Haematology and BMT, A.O.U. ‘Policlinico-San Marco’, 95123 Catania, Italy; (V.D.F.); (N.L.P.); (U.M.); (S.L.); (F.E.)
| | - Nunziatina Laura Parrinello
- Division of Haematology and BMT, A.O.U. ‘Policlinico-San Marco’, 95123 Catania, Italy; (V.D.F.); (N.L.P.); (U.M.); (S.L.); (F.E.)
| | - Alessandro Allegra
- Division of Haematology, Department of Human Pathology in Adulthood and Childhood “Gaetano Barresi”, University of Messina, 98125 Messina, Italy;
| | - Uroš Markovic
- Division of Haematology and BMT, A.O.U. ‘Policlinico-San Marco’, 95123 Catania, Italy; (V.D.F.); (N.L.P.); (U.M.); (S.L.); (F.E.)
| | - Cirino Botta
- Department of Health Promotion, Mother and Child Care, Internal Medicine and Medical Specialties “G. D’Alessandro”, University of Palermo, 90127 Palermo, Italy;
| | - Fabrizio Accardi
- Department of Hematology I, Azienda Ospedaliera Ospedali Riuniti Villa Sofia-Cervello, 90146 Palermo, Italy;
| | - Iolanda Donatella Vincelli
- Haematology Unit, Haemato-Oncology and Radiotherapy Department, Grande Ospedale Metropolitano “Bianchi-Melacrino-Morelli”, 89124 Reggio Calabria, Italy;
| | - Salvatore Leotta
- Division of Haematology and BMT, A.O.U. ‘Policlinico-San Marco’, 95123 Catania, Italy; (V.D.F.); (N.L.P.); (U.M.); (S.L.); (F.E.)
| | - Federica Elia
- Division of Haematology and BMT, A.O.U. ‘Policlinico-San Marco’, 95123 Catania, Italy; (V.D.F.); (N.L.P.); (U.M.); (S.L.); (F.E.)
| | - Benedetta Esposito
- Post-Graduation School of Haematology, University of Catania, A.O.U. ‘Policlinico-San Marco’, 95123 Catania, Italy; (M.F.); (B.E.); (B.G.); (G.S.); (A.O.); (F.D.R.)
| | - Bruno Garibaldi
- Post-Graduation School of Haematology, University of Catania, A.O.U. ‘Policlinico-San Marco’, 95123 Catania, Italy; (M.F.); (B.E.); (B.G.); (G.S.); (A.O.); (F.D.R.)
| | - Gabriele Sapuppo
- Post-Graduation School of Haematology, University of Catania, A.O.U. ‘Policlinico-San Marco’, 95123 Catania, Italy; (M.F.); (B.E.); (B.G.); (G.S.); (A.O.); (F.D.R.)
| | - Alessandra Orofino
- Post-Graduation School of Haematology, University of Catania, A.O.U. ‘Policlinico-San Marco’, 95123 Catania, Italy; (M.F.); (B.E.); (B.G.); (G.S.); (A.O.); (F.D.R.)
| | - Alessandra Romano
- Dipartimento di Specialità Medico-Chirurgiche, CHIRMED, Sezione di Ematologia, Università degli Studi di Catania, 95131 Catania, Italy;
| | - Giuseppe A. Palumbo
- Dipartimento di Scienze Mediche, Chirurgiche e Tecnologie Avanzate “G.F.Ingrassia”, University of Catania, 95131 Catania, Italy;
| | - Francesco Di Raimondo
- Post-Graduation School of Haematology, University of Catania, A.O.U. ‘Policlinico-San Marco’, 95123 Catania, Italy; (M.F.); (B.E.); (B.G.); (G.S.); (A.O.); (F.D.R.)
- Division of Haematology and BMT, A.O.U. ‘Policlinico-San Marco’, 95123 Catania, Italy; (V.D.F.); (N.L.P.); (U.M.); (S.L.); (F.E.)
- Dipartimento di Specialità Medico-Chirurgiche, CHIRMED, Sezione di Ematologia, Università degli Studi di Catania, 95131 Catania, Italy;
| | - Concetta Conticello
- Division of Haematology and BMT, A.O.U. ‘Policlinico-San Marco’, 95123 Catania, Italy; (V.D.F.); (N.L.P.); (U.M.); (S.L.); (F.E.)
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Najjar M, McCarron J, Cliff ERS, Berger K, Steensma DP, Al Hadidi S, Chakraborty R, Goodman A, Anto E, Greene T, Sborov D, Mohyuddin GR. Adverse Event Reporting in Randomized Clinical Trials for Multiple Myeloma. JAMA Netw Open 2023; 6:e2342195. [PMID: 37948080 PMCID: PMC10638643 DOI: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2023.42195] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/27/2023] [Accepted: 09/28/2023] [Indexed: 11/12/2023] Open
Abstract
Importance Cancer treatment can result in burdensome toxic effects that profoundly affect patient quality of life. In seeking to emphasize the efficacy of tested treatments, clinical trial reports may use subjective or minimizing terms to describe adverse events (AEs). Objective To evaluate patterns of AE reporting in multiple myeloma (MM) randomized clinical trials (RCTs) published between 2015 and early 2023. Design, Setting, and Participants For this cohort study, the PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials databases were searched to assess the prevalence of minimizing terms in MM RCTs published between January 1, 2015, and March 1, 2023. Minimizing terms were defined as subjective terms used to favorably describe the safety profile of the intervention. The terms searched included convenient, manageable, acceptable, expected, well-tolerated, tolerable, favorable, and safe. Final data analysis was performed on July 21, 2023. Main Outcomes and Measures The primary outcome was the occurrence of at least 1 minimizing term in an article. Univariate logistic regression analyses were performed to evaluate the association between the presence of at least 1 minimizing term and the actual incidence of grade 3 or 4 AEs, serious AEs, or grade 5 AEs. Results Of the 65 RCTs included, 56 (86%) used minimizing terms when describing treatment-emergent AEs. The most frequently used minimizing terms were well-tolerated or tolerable in 29 trials (45%), manageable in 18 (28%), and acceptable in 16 (25%). Grade 3 or 4 AE rate in the examined RCTs ranged from 23% to 94%, with a median of 75% (IQR, 59%-82%). A univariate regression analysis demonstrated no association between the use of minimizing terms and grade 3 or 4 AE rates (odds ratio [OR], 1.35 [95% CI, 0.88-2.10] per 10% AE rate increase; P = .17) or grade 5 AE rates (OR, 3.16 [95% CI, 0.27-12.7] per 10% AE rate increase; P = .45). Conclusions and Relevance These findings suggest that trial investigators and sponsors regularly use minimizing terms to describe toxic effects in MM trials, and use of this terminology may not reflect actual AE rates in these studies. Instead of using these terms, trial investigators should highlight event rates and patient-reported outcomes, to allow clinicians and patients to better evaluate the true tolerability of AEs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mimi Najjar
- Department of Oncology, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland
| | - John McCarron
- Division of Hematology and Hematological Malignancies, Huntsman Cancer Institute, University of Utah, Salt Lake City
| | - Edward R. Scheffer Cliff
- Program on Regulation, Therapeutics, and Law, Division of Pharmacoepidemiology and Pharmacoeconomics, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| | | | | | - Samer Al Hadidi
- Myeloma Center, Winthrop P. Rockefeller Cancer Institute, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Little Rock
| | - Rajshekhar Chakraborty
- Herbert Irving Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, New York
| | - Aaron Goodman
- Division of Hematology, University of California, San Diego
| | - Eric Anto
- Division of Biostatistics, Department of Population Health Sciences, University of Utah, Salt Lake City
| | - Tom Greene
- Division of Biostatistics, Department of Population Health Sciences, University of Utah, Salt Lake City
| | - Douglas Sborov
- Division of Hematology and Hematological Malignancies, Huntsman Cancer Institute, University of Utah, Salt Lake City
| | - Ghulam Rehman Mohyuddin
- Division of Hematology and Hematological Malignancies, Huntsman Cancer Institute, University of Utah, Salt Lake City
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Nørgaard JN, Abildgaard N, Lysén A, Tsykunova G, Vangsted AJ, João C, Remen N, Nielsen LK, Osnes L, Stokke C, Connelly JP, Revheim MER, Schjesvold F. Intensifying treatment in PET-positive multiple myeloma patients after upfront autologous stem cell transplantation. Leukemia 2023; 37:2107-2114. [PMID: 37568010 DOI: 10.1038/s41375-023-01998-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/02/2023] [Revised: 07/26/2023] [Accepted: 08/04/2023] [Indexed: 08/13/2023]
Abstract
18F-Fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET) positivity after first-line treatment with autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) in multiple myeloma is strongly correlated with reduced progression-free and overall survival. However, PET-positive patients who achieve PET negativity after treatment seem to have comparable outcomes to patients who were PET negative at diagnosis. Hence, giving PET-positive patients additional treatment may improve their outcome. In this phase II study, we screened first-line patients with very good partial response (VGPR) or better after ASCT with PET. PET-positive patients received four 28-day cycles of carfilzomib-lenalidomide-dexamethasone (KRd). Flow cytometry-based minimal residual disease (MRD) analysis was performed before and after treatment for correlation with PET. Overall, 159 patients were screened with PET. A total of 53 patients (33%) were PET positive and 57% of PET-positive patients were MRD negative, demonstrating that these response assessments are complementary. KRd consolidation converted 33% of PET-positive patients into PET negativity. MRD-negative patients were more likely to convert than MRD-positive patients. In summary, PET after ASCT detected residual disease in a substantial proportion of patients in VGPR or better, even in patients who were MRD negative, and KRd consolidation treatment changed PET status in 33% of patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jakob Nordberg Nørgaard
- Oslo Myeloma Center, Department of Hematology, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway.
- Institute of Clinical Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.
- KG Jebsen Center for B cell malignancies, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.
| | - Niels Abildgaard
- Department of Hematology, Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark
- Department of Clinical Research, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark
| | - Anna Lysén
- Oslo Myeloma Center, Department of Hematology, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
- KG Jebsen Center for B cell malignancies, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
| | - Galina Tsykunova
- Division of Hematology, Haukeland University Hospital, Bergen, Norway
| | | | - Cristina João
- Department of Hematology, Champalimaud Centre for the Unknown, Lisboa, Portugal
- Nova Medical School, Universidade Nova de Lisboa, Lisbon, Portugal
| | - Nora Remen
- Oslo Myeloma Center, Department of Hematology, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
| | - Lene Kongsgaard Nielsen
- Quality of Life Research Center, Department of Haematology, Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark
- Department of Hematology, Gødstrup Hospital, Herning, Denmark
- OPEN, Open Patient data Explorative Network, Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark
| | - Liv Osnes
- Department of Immunology, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
| | - Caroline Stokke
- Division for Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
- Department of Physics, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
| | - James P Connelly
- Division for Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
| | - Mona-Elisabeth R Revheim
- Institute of Clinical Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
- Division for Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
- The Intervention Centre, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
| | - Fredrik Schjesvold
- Oslo Myeloma Center, Department of Hematology, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
- KG Jebsen Center for B cell malignancies, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Costa BA, Mouhieddine TH, Ortiz RJ, Richter J. Revisiting the Role of Alkylating Agents in Multiple Myeloma: Up-to-Date Evidence and Future Perspectives. Crit Rev Oncol Hematol 2023; 187:104040. [PMID: 37244325 DOI: 10.1016/j.critrevonc.2023.104040] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/16/2023] [Revised: 05/15/2023] [Accepted: 05/23/2023] [Indexed: 05/29/2023] Open
Abstract
From the 1960s to the early 2000s, alkylating agents (e.g., melphalan, cyclophosphamide, and bendamustine) remained a key component of standard therapy for newly-diagnosed or relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma (MM). Later on, their associated toxicities (including second primary malignancies) and the unprecedented efficacy of novel therapies have led clinicians to increasingly consider alkylator-free approaches. Meanwhile, new alkylating agents (e.g., melflufen) and new applications of old alkylators (e.g., lymphodepletion before chimeric antigen receptor T-cell [CAR-T] therapy) have emerged in recent years. Given the expanding use of antigen-directed modalities (e.g., monoclonal antibodies, bispecific antibodies, and CAR-T therapy), this review explores the current and future role of alkylating agents in different treatment settings (e.g., induction, consolidation, stem cell mobilization, pre-transplant conditioning, salvage, bridging, and lymphodepleting chemotherapy) to ellucidate the role of alkylator-based regimens in modern-day MM management.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Bruno Almeida Costa
- Department of Medicine, Mount Sinai Morningside and West, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA
| | - Tarek H Mouhieddine
- Division of Hematology and Medical Oncology, Tisch Cancer Institute, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA
| | - Ricardo J Ortiz
- Department of Medicine, Mount Sinai Morningside and West, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA
| | - Joshua Richter
- Division of Hematology and Medical Oncology, Tisch Cancer Institute, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Panopoulou A, Cairns DA, Holroyd A, Nichols I, Cray N, Pawlyn C, Cook G, Drayson M, Boyd K, Davies FE, Jenner M, Morgan GJ, Owen R, Houlston R, Jackson G, Kaiser MF. Optimizing the value of lenalidomide maintenance by extended genetic profiling: an analysis of 556 patients in the Myeloma XI trial. Blood 2023; 141:1666-1674. [PMID: 36564045 PMCID: PMC10113174 DOI: 10.1182/blood.2022018339] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/06/2022] [Revised: 11/29/2022] [Accepted: 12/04/2022] [Indexed: 12/25/2022] Open
Abstract
Prediction of individual patient benefit from lenalidomide (Len) maintenance after autologous stem cell transplant (ASCT) remains challenging. Here, we investigated extended molecular profiling for outcome prediction in patients in the National Cancer Research Institute Myeloma XI (MyXI) trial. Patients in the MyXI trial randomized to Len maintenance or observation after ASCT were genetically profiled for t(4;14), t(14;16), t(14;20), del(1p), gain(1q), and del(17p) and co-occurrence of risk markers was computed. Progression-free survival (PFS), subsequent progression (PFS2), and overall survival (OS) were calculated from maintenance randomization, and groups were compared using Cox proportional hazards regression. Of 556 patients, 17% with double-hit multiple myeloma (MM) (≥2 risk markers), 32% with single-hit (1 risk marker), and 51% without risk markers were analyzed. Single-hit MM derived the highest PFS benefit from Len maintenance, specifically, isolated del(1p), del(17p), and t(4;14), with ∼40-fold, 10-fold, and sevenfold reduced risk of progression or death (PFS), respectively, compared with observation. This benefit translated into improved PFS2 and OS for this group of patients compared with observation; median PFS was 10.9 vs 57.3 months for observation vs Len maintenance. Patients with isolated gain(1q) derived no benefit, and double-hit MM limited benefit (regardless or risk lesions involved) from Len maintenance. Extended genetic profiling identifies patients deriving exceptional benefit from Len maintenance and should be considered for newly diagnosed patients to support management discussions along their treatment pathway. This trial was registered at www.isrctn.com/ISRCTN49407852 as # ISRCTN49407852.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Aikaterini Panopoulou
- Division of Genetics and Epidemiology, Institute of Cancer Research, London, United Kingdom
- Department of Haematology, Royal Marsden Hospital, London, United Kingdom
| | - David A. Cairns
- Leeds Cancer Research UK Clinical Trials Unit, Leeds Institute of Clinical Trials Research, Leeds, United Kingdom
| | - Amy Holroyd
- Division of Genetics and Epidemiology, Institute of Cancer Research, London, United Kingdom
| | - Isabel Nichols
- Division of Genetics and Epidemiology, Institute of Cancer Research, London, United Kingdom
| | - Nikita Cray
- Division of Genetics and Epidemiology, Institute of Cancer Research, London, United Kingdom
| | - Charlotte Pawlyn
- Department of Haematology, Royal Marsden Hospital, London, United Kingdom
- Division of Cancer Therapeutics, Institute of Cancer Research, London, United Kingdom
| | - Gordon Cook
- Leeds Cancer Research UK Clinical Trials Unit, Leeds Institute of Clinical Trials Research, Leeds, United Kingdom
| | - Mark Drayson
- Institute of Immunology and Immunotherapy, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, United Kingdom
| | - Kevin Boyd
- Division of Genetics and Epidemiology, Institute of Cancer Research, London, United Kingdom
- Department of Haematology, Royal Marsden Hospital, London, United Kingdom
| | | | - Matthew Jenner
- Department of Haematology, University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust, Southampton, United Kingdom
| | | | - Roger Owen
- Haematological Malignancy Diagnostic Service, St James’s University Hospital, Leeds, United Kingdom
| | - Richard Houlston
- Division of Genetics and Epidemiology, Institute of Cancer Research, London, United Kingdom
| | - Graham Jackson
- Department of Haematology, University of Newcastle, Newcastle Upon Tyne, United Kingdom
| | - Martin F. Kaiser
- Division of Genetics and Epidemiology, Institute of Cancer Research, London, United Kingdom
- Department of Haematology, Royal Marsden Hospital, London, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Implications and prognostic impact of mass spectrometry in patients with newly-diagnosed multiple myeloma. Blood Cancer J 2023; 13:1. [PMID: 36599831 DOI: 10.1038/s41408-022-00772-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 13.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/14/2022] [Revised: 12/08/2022] [Accepted: 12/12/2022] [Indexed: 01/06/2023] Open
Abstract
Mass spectrometry (MS) is a promising tool for monitoring monoclonal protein in plasma cell dyscrasias. We included 480 transplant-eligible newly-diagnosed multiple myeloma (MM) patients from the GMMG-MM5 trial (EudraCT No. 2010-019173-16) and performed a retrospective MS analysis at baseline (480 patients) and at the pre-defined, consecutive time points after induction (444 patients), prior to maintenance (305 patients) and after one year of maintenance (227 patients). We found that MS negativity was significantly associated with improved progression-free survival (PFS) even in patients with complete response (CR) at all investigated follow-up time points. The prognostic impact was independent of established risk factors, such as the revised International Staging System. Combining MS and baseline cytogenetics improved the prediction of outcome: MS-positive patients with high-risk cytogenetics had a dismal PFS of 1.9 years (95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.6-2.3 years) from the start of maintenance. Testing the value of sequential MS prior to and after one year of maintenance, patients converting from MS positivity to negativity had an excellent PFS (median not reached) while patients converting from MS negativity to positivity progressed early (median 0.6 years, 95% CI: 0.3-not reached). Among patients with sustained MS positivity, the baseline high-risk cytogenetic status had a significant impact and defined a group with poor PFS. Combining minimal residual disease (MRD) in the bone marrow and MS allowed the identification of double negative patients with a favorable PFS (median 3.33 years, 95% CI: 3.08-not reached) and no overall survival events. Our study provides strong evidence that MS is superior to conventional response monitoring, highlighting the potential of MS to become a new standard. Our data indicate that MS should be performed sequentially and combined with baseline disease features and MRD to improve its clinical value.Clinical Trials Register: EudraCT No. 2010-019173-16.
Collapse
|
12
|
Costello CL. Newly diagnosed multiple myeloma: making sense of the menu. HEMATOLOGY. AMERICAN SOCIETY OF HEMATOLOGY. EDUCATION PROGRAM 2022; 2022:539-550. [PMID: 36485145 PMCID: PMC9820388 DOI: 10.1182/hematology.2022000404] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/17/2023]
Abstract
The development of new drugs and subsequent novel combinations for the treatment of newly diagnosed multiple myeloma (NDMM) has resulted in a plethora of treatment options that can make the choice of initial induction therapy a challenge. A greater understanding of both patient- and disease-specific factors can provide a personalized approach to help design a treatment course. Historically, the choice of an induction regimen has been tethered to an initial impression of transplant eligibility at the time of diagnosis. As more effective and better-tolerated induction regimens have emerged, there has been increasing overlap in the induction strategies used for all patients with NDMM, which increasingly provide the ultimate goal of deep and durable remissions. The current treatment options and strategies for the management of NDMM are evaluated using the best available data to provide a rationale for these decisions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Caitlin L. Costello
- Correspondence Caitlin L. Costello, UCSD, 3855 Health Sciences Drive, MC 0960, La Jolla, CA 92093, USA; e-mail:
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Wang SY, Holzhey T, Heyn S, Zehrfeld T, Fricke S, Hoffmann FA, Becker C, Braunert L, Edelmann T, Paulenz I, Hitzschke M, Flade F, Schwarzer A, Fenchel K, Franke GN, Vucinic V, Jentzsch M, Schwind S, Hell S, Backhaus D, Lange T, Niederwieser D, Scholz M, Platzbecker U, Pönisch W. Impact of the changing landscape of induction therapy prior to autologous stem cell transplantation in 540 newly diagnosed myeloma patients: a retrospective real-world study. J Cancer Res Clin Oncol 2022:10.1007/s00432-022-04184-x. [DOI: 10.1007/s00432-022-04184-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/04/2022] [Accepted: 07/01/2022] [Indexed: 10/15/2022]
Abstract
Abstract
Introduction
Autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) is the standard treatment for younger patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma (MM). However, due to restrictive exclusion criteria, more than half of eligible patients are usually excluded from transplant studies.
Methods
This retrospective monocentric analysis included 540 patients with MM who received an ASCT between 1996 and 2019.
Results
Up to 2005, induction therapy consisted mainly of conventional chemotherapies, e.g. vincristine/doxorubicin/dexamethasone (VAD). In the following years, the triple-combinations based on bortezomib coupled with doxorubicin/dexamethasone (PAD), melphalan/prednisolone (VMP), cyclophposphamide/dexamethasone (VCD) or bendamustine/prednisolone (BPV) became the most popular treatment options. A progressive improvement in PFS was observed in patients treated with the two current induction therapies BPV (47 months) or VCD (54 months) compared to VAD (35 months, p < 0.03), PAD (39 months, p < 0.01 and VMP (36 months, p < 0.01). However, there was no significant difference in median OS (VAD 78, PAD 74, VMP 72, BPV 80 months and VCD not reached). In our analysis, we also included 139 patients who do fulfill at least one of the exclusion criteria for most phase 3 transplant studies (POEMS/amyloidosis/plasma cell leukemia, eGFR < 40 mL/min, severe cardiac dysfunction or poor general condition). Outcome for these patients was not significantly inferior compared to patients who met the inclusion criteria for most of the transplant studies with PFS of 36 vs 41 months (p = 0.78) and OS of 78 vs 79 months (p = 0.34).
Conclusions
Our real-world data in unselected pts also stress the substantial value of ASCT during the first-line treatment of younger MM pts.
Collapse
|
14
|
D'Agostino M, Cairns DA, Lahuerta JJ, Wester R, Bertsch U, Waage A, Zamagni E, Mateos MV, Dall'Olio D, van de Donk NWCJ, Jackson G, Rocchi S, Salwender H, Bladé Creixenti J, van der Holt B, Castellani G, Bonello F, Capra A, Mai EK, Dürig J, Gay F, Zweegman S, Cavo M, Kaiser MF, Goldschmidt H, Hernández Rivas JM, Larocca A, Cook G, San-Miguel JF, Boccadoro M, Sonneveld P. Second Revision of the International Staging System (R2-ISS) for Overall Survival in Multiple Myeloma: A European Myeloma Network (EMN) Report Within the HARMONY Project. J Clin Oncol 2022; 40:3406-3418. [PMID: 35605179 DOI: 10.1200/jco.21.02614] [Citation(s) in RCA: 131] [Impact Index Per Article: 65.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/20/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE Patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma (NDMM) show heterogeneous outcomes, and approximately 60% of them are at intermediate-risk according to the Revised International Staging system (R-ISS), the standard-of-care risk stratification model. Moreover, chromosome 1q gain/amplification (1q+) recently proved to be a poor prognostic factor. In this study, we revised the R-ISS by analyzing the additive value of each single risk feature, including 1q+. PATIENTS AND METHODS The European Myeloma Network, within the HARMONY project, collected individual data from 10,843 patients with NDMM enrolled in 16 clinical trials. An additive scoring system on the basis of top features predicting progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) was developed and validated. RESULTS In the training set (N = 7,072), at a median follow-up of 75 months, ISS, del(17p), lactate dehydrogenase, t(4;14), and 1q+ had the highest impact on PFS and OS. These variables were all simultaneously present in 2,226 patients. A value was assigned to each risk feature according to their OS impact (ISS-III 1.5, ISS-II 1, del(17p) 1, high lactate dehydrogenase 1, and 1q+ 0.5 points). Patients were stratified into four risk groups according to the total additive score: low (Second Revision of the International Staging System [R2-ISS]-I, 19.2%, 0 points), low-intermediate (II, 30.8%, 0.5-1 points), intermediate-high (III, 41.2%, 1.5-2.5 points), high (IV, 8.8%, 3-5 points). Median OS was not reached versus 109.2 versus 68.5 versus 37.9 months, and median PFS was 68 versus 45.5 versus 30.2 versus 19.9 months, respectively. The score was validated in an independent validation set (N = 3,771, of whom 1,214 were with complete data to calculate R2-ISS) maintaining its prognostic value. CONCLUSION The R2-ISS is a simple prognostic staging system allowing a better stratification of patients with intermediate-risk NDMM. The additive nature of this score fosters its future implementation with new prognostic variables.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mattia D'Agostino
- SSD Clinical Trial in Oncoematologia e Mieloma Multiplo, Division of Hematology, University of Torino, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Città della Salute e della Scienza di Torino, Torino, Italy
| | - David A Cairns
- Leeds Cancer Research UK Clinical Trials Unit, Leeds Institute of Clinical Trials Research, University of Leeds, Leeds, United Kingdom
| | - Juan José Lahuerta
- Instituto de Investigación del Hospital Universitario 12 de Octubre, Madrid, Spain
| | - Ruth Wester
- Department of Hematology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Uta Bertsch
- University Hospital Heidelberg, Internal Medicine V and National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Anders Waage
- Institute of Clinical and Molecular Medicine, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Trondheim, Norway
| | - Elena Zamagni
- IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna, Istituto di Ematologia "Seràgnoli," Bologna, Italy.,Dipartimento di Medicina Specialistica, Diagnostica e Sperimentale, Università di Bologna, Bologna, Italy
| | - María-Victoria Mateos
- Complejo Asistencial Universitario de Salamanca/IBSAL/CIC/Ciberonc, Salamanca, Spain
| | - Daniele Dall'Olio
- Dipartimento di Fisica e Astronomia, Università di Bologna, Bologna, Italy
| | - Niels W C J van de Donk
- Department of Hematology, Amsterdam UMC, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Graham Jackson
- University of Newcastle upon Tyne, Newcastle upon Tyne, United Kingdom
| | - Serena Rocchi
- IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna, Istituto di Ematologia "Seràgnoli," Bologna, Italy.,Dipartimento di Medicina Specialistica, Diagnostica e Sperimentale, Università di Bologna, Bologna, Italy
| | - Hans Salwender
- Asklepios Tumorzentrum Hamburg, AK Altona and AK St Georg, Hamburg, Germany
| | | | - Bronno van der Holt
- HOVON Data Center, Department of Hematology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Gastone Castellani
- Dipartimento di Medicina Specialistica, Diagnostica e Sperimentale, Università di Bologna, Bologna, Italy
| | - Francesca Bonello
- SSD Clinical Trial in Oncoematologia e Mieloma Multiplo, Division of Hematology, University of Torino, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Città della Salute e della Scienza di Torino, Torino, Italy
| | - Andrea Capra
- SSD Clinical Trial in Oncoematologia e Mieloma Multiplo, Division of Hematology, University of Torino, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Città della Salute e della Scienza di Torino, Torino, Italy
| | - Elias K Mai
- University Hospital Heidelberg, Internal Medicine V and National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Jan Dürig
- Department of Hematology, University Clinic Essen, Essen, Germany
| | - Francesca Gay
- SSD Clinical Trial in Oncoematologia e Mieloma Multiplo, Division of Hematology, University of Torino, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Città della Salute e della Scienza di Torino, Torino, Italy
| | - Sonja Zweegman
- Department of Hematology, Amsterdam UMC, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Michele Cavo
- IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna, Istituto di Ematologia "Seràgnoli," Bologna, Italy.,Dipartimento di Medicina Specialistica, Diagnostica e Sperimentale, Università di Bologna, Bologna, Italy
| | - Martin F Kaiser
- The Institute of Cancer Research, London, United Kingdom and The Royal Marsden Hospital, London, United Kingdom
| | - Hartmut Goldschmidt
- University Hospital Heidelberg, Internal Medicine V and National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Jesús María Hernández Rivas
- Department of Medicine, University of Salamanca, Institute of Biomedical Research of Salamanca (IBSAL), University of Salamanca-Cancer Research Center of Salamanca (IBMCC, USAL-CSIG). Hematology Department, Hospital Universitario de Salamanca (CAUSA/IBSAL), Salamanca, Spain
| | - Alessandra Larocca
- SSD Clinical Trial in Oncoematologia e Mieloma Multiplo, Division of Hematology, University of Torino, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Città della Salute e della Scienza di Torino, Torino, Italy
| | - Gordon Cook
- Leeds Cancer Research UK Clinical Trials Unit, Leeds Institute of Clinical Trials Research, University of Leeds, Leeds, United Kingdom
| | - Jesús F San-Miguel
- Clínica Universidad de Navarra, CIMA, IDISNA, CIBER-ONC (CB16/12/00369), Pamplona, Spain
| | - Mario Boccadoro
- SSD Clinical Trial in Oncoematologia e Mieloma Multiplo, Division of Hematology, University of Torino, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Città della Salute e della Scienza di Torino, Torino, Italy
| | - Pieter Sonneveld
- Department of Hematology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Gupta RK, Gupta A, Hillengass J, Holstein SA, Suman VJ, Taneja A, McCarthy PL. A review of the current status of lenalidomide maintenance therapy in multiple myeloma in 2022. Expert Rev Anticancer Ther 2022; 22:457-469. [PMID: 35503516 DOI: 10.1080/14737140.2022.2069564] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/08/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Recent advances in the diagnosis and management of multiple myeloma (MM) have improved patient outcomes. This progress in our understanding of MM has resulted in continuous suppressive therapy concepts, including induction, high dose chemotherapy with autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT), consolidation, and maintenance therapy. The foundation of maintenance therapy has been with lenalidomide. Other novel immunomodulatory drugs (IMiDs), proteasome inhibitors (PIs), and targeted monoclonal antibodies have also contributed to this evolution. AREAS COVERED This review summarizes the outcomes from phase II/III trials with long-term lenalidomide maintenance therapy alone or in combination with other agents in post-ASCT and non-transplant settings for newly diagnosed patients with MM. We review recent data considering a combination with newer medications and ongoing trials. We also review the optimal duration, MRD negativity rate, and safety and tolerability aspects of lenalidomide maintenance therapy. This review aims to present the current and emerging clinical evidence that supports using lenalidomide as a backbone for maintenance therapy in patients with MM. EXPERT OPINION There is increasing evidence to support lenalidomide as the backbone of combination therapy in the maintenance setting.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ravi Kumar Gupta
- Department of Internal Medicine, Larkin Community Hospital, South Miami, Florida, USA
| | - Ashish Gupta
- Department of Medicine, Roswell Park Comprehensive Cancer Center, Buffalo, NY, USA
| | - Jens Hillengass
- Department of Medicine, Roswell Park Comprehensive Cancer Center, Buffalo, NY, USA
| | - Sarah A Holstein
- Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Oncology and Hematology, University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, NE, USA
| | - Vera J Suman
- Department of Health Sciences, Division of Quantitative Health Sciences, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | - Alankrita Taneja
- Department of Medicine, Roswell Park Comprehensive Cancer Center, Buffalo, NY, USA
| | - Philip L McCarthy
- Department of Medicine, Roswell Park Comprehensive Cancer Center, Buffalo, NY, USA
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Re: Arcuri and Americo "Treatment of relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma in the bortezomib and lenalidomide era: a systematic review and network meta-analysis". Ann Hematol 2022; 101:1599-1601. [PMID: 35179641 PMCID: PMC9203368 DOI: 10.1007/s00277-022-04792-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/29/2021] [Accepted: 02/07/2022] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
|
17
|
Morè S, Corvatta L, Manieri VM, Saraceni F, Scortechini I, Mancini G, Fiorentini A, Olivieri A, Offidani M. Autologous Stem Cell Transplantation in Multiple Myeloma: Where Are We and Where Do We Want to Go? Cells 2022; 11:606. [PMID: 35203257 PMCID: PMC8870632 DOI: 10.3390/cells11040606] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/18/2022] [Revised: 02/04/2022] [Accepted: 02/07/2022] [Indexed: 12/22/2022] Open
Abstract
The introduction of high-dose therapy in the 1990s as well as the development of drugs such as thalidomide, lenalidomide, and bortezomib in the 2000s led to an impressive improvement in outcome of patients with multiple myeloma (MM) eligible for autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT). Clinical trials conducted in the first ten years of the twenty-first century established as standard therapy for these patients a therapeutic approach including induction, single or double ASCT, consolidation, and maintenance therapy. More recently, incorporating second-generation proteasome inhibitors carfilzomib and monoclonal antibody daratumumab into each phase of treatment significantly improved the efficacy of ASCT in terms of measurable residual disease (MRD) negativity, Progression Free Survival (PFS), and Overall Survival (OS). The availability of techniques such as multiparameter flow cytometry (MFC) and next-generation sequencing (NGS) for MRD assessment allowed the design of MRD-based response-adjusted trials that will define, in particular, the role of consolidation and maintenance therapies. In this review, we will provide an overview of the most recent evidence and the future prospects of ASCT in MM patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sonia Morè
- Clinica di Ematologia, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Ospedali Riuniti di Ancona, 60126 Torrette, Italy; (S.M.); (V.M.M.); (F.S.); (I.S.); (G.M.); (A.F.); (A.O.)
| | - Laura Corvatta
- U.O.C. Medicina, Ospedale Engles Profili, 60044 Fabriano, Italy;
| | - Valentina Maria Manieri
- Clinica di Ematologia, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Ospedali Riuniti di Ancona, 60126 Torrette, Italy; (S.M.); (V.M.M.); (F.S.); (I.S.); (G.M.); (A.F.); (A.O.)
| | - Francesco Saraceni
- Clinica di Ematologia, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Ospedali Riuniti di Ancona, 60126 Torrette, Italy; (S.M.); (V.M.M.); (F.S.); (I.S.); (G.M.); (A.F.); (A.O.)
| | - Ilaria Scortechini
- Clinica di Ematologia, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Ospedali Riuniti di Ancona, 60126 Torrette, Italy; (S.M.); (V.M.M.); (F.S.); (I.S.); (G.M.); (A.F.); (A.O.)
| | - Giorgia Mancini
- Clinica di Ematologia, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Ospedali Riuniti di Ancona, 60126 Torrette, Italy; (S.M.); (V.M.M.); (F.S.); (I.S.); (G.M.); (A.F.); (A.O.)
| | - Alessandro Fiorentini
- Clinica di Ematologia, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Ospedali Riuniti di Ancona, 60126 Torrette, Italy; (S.M.); (V.M.M.); (F.S.); (I.S.); (G.M.); (A.F.); (A.O.)
| | - Attilio Olivieri
- Clinica di Ematologia, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Ospedali Riuniti di Ancona, 60126 Torrette, Italy; (S.M.); (V.M.M.); (F.S.); (I.S.); (G.M.); (A.F.); (A.O.)
| | - Massimo Offidani
- Clinica di Ematologia, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Ospedali Riuniti di Ancona, 60126 Torrette, Italy; (S.M.); (V.M.M.); (F.S.); (I.S.); (G.M.); (A.F.); (A.O.)
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Yan ZL, Wang YW, Chang YJ. Cellular Immunotherapies for Multiple Myeloma: Current Status, Challenges, and Future Directions. Oncol Ther 2022; 10:85-103. [PMID: 35103936 PMCID: PMC9098731 DOI: 10.1007/s40487-022-00186-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/04/2021] [Accepted: 01/20/2022] [Indexed: 11/25/2022] Open
Abstract
Multiple myeloma (MM) remains incurable due to relapse, although the use of proteasome inhibitors, immunomodulatory drugs, CD38-targeting antibodies, and autologous stem cell transplantation (auto-SCT) significantly improve the clinical outcomes of patients with newly diagnosed MM. In recent years, the introduction of chimeric antigen receptor T-cell (CAR T-cell) therapy has brought hope to patients with refractory and relapsed MM. The graft-versus-myeloma effect of allogeneic SCT provides the possibility for curing a subset of MM patients. In this review, we summarize the recent advances and challenges of cellular immunotherapies for MM, focusing on auto-SCT, allogeneic SCT, and CAR T-cell approaches. We also discuss future directions, and propose a specific algorithm for cellular therapies for MM and probability of minimal residual disease-directed therapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Zhi-Ling Yan
- Deparment of Hematology, The Affiliated Hospital of Xuzhou Medical University, Xuzhou, China
| | - Yue-Wen Wang
- Peking University People's Hospital & Peking University Institute of Hematology, No 11 Xizhimen South Street, Beijing, 100044, China
- National Clinical Research Center for Hematologic Disease, Beijing, China
- Beijing Key Laboratory of Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation, Beijing, China
- Collaborative Innovation Center of Hematology, Peking University, Beijing, People's Republic of China
| | - Ying-Jun Chang
- Peking University People's Hospital & Peking University Institute of Hematology, No 11 Xizhimen South Street, Beijing, 100044, China.
- National Clinical Research Center for Hematologic Disease, Beijing, China.
- Beijing Key Laboratory of Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation, Beijing, China.
- Collaborative Innovation Center of Hematology, Peking University, Beijing, People's Republic of China.
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Ghandili S, Weisel KC, Bokemeyer C, Leypoldt LB. Current Treatment Approaches to Newly Diagnosed Multiple Myeloma. Oncol Res Treat 2021; 44:690-699. [PMID: 34784608 DOI: 10.1159/000520504] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/09/2021] [Accepted: 10/26/2021] [Indexed: 11/19/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Multiple myeloma is a so far incurable malignant plasma cell disorder. During the past 2 decades, treatment paradigms substantially changed when novel drugs were introduced initially in treatment of relapsed disease and subsequently also in first-line treatment. SUMMARY Up to now, first-line treatment differs between patients initially classified as transplant eligible and those who are considered as nontransplant eligible. Transplant-eligible patients receive a primary proteasome inhibitor (PI)-based induction which is being combined with an immunomodulating agent and a CD38-directed monoclonal antibody followed by high-dose melphalan therapy and autologous stem cell transplantation with subsequent maintenance treatment with lenalidomide. Patients who are considered as nontransplant eligible receive upfront treatment preferentially with a continuous combination treatment either with a CD38-directed monoclonal antibody in combination with the immunomodulating agent lenalidomide or a lenalidomide-PI combination followed by lenalidomide maintenance. Key Messages: Primary goal of the initiated treatment is to induce a rapid and deep remission which ideally leads to an eradication of the residual plasma cell clone in sense of a minimal residual disease negativity. Achievement of long-term remission with limited toxicity despite continuous treatment strategies and maintenance or improvement of life-quality is key. Despite successful treatment options, specific difficult-to-treat subgroups, especially patients with high-risk myeloma remain with inferior prognosis and a clear unmet need for novel therapeutic strategies. Future concepts will evaluate cellular treatments and other innovative immunotherapies in first-line treatment in curative intention.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Susanne Ghandili
- Department of Hematology, Oncology and Bone Marrow Transplantation with Section of Pneumology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Katja C Weisel
- Department of Hematology, Oncology and Bone Marrow Transplantation with Section of Pneumology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Carsten Bokemeyer
- Department of Hematology, Oncology and Bone Marrow Transplantation with Section of Pneumology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Lisa Beatrice Leypoldt
- Department of Hematology, Oncology and Bone Marrow Transplantation with Section of Pneumology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
MCT1 is a Predictive Marker for Lenalidomide Maintenance Therapy in Multiple Myeloma. Blood Adv 2021; 6:515-520. [PMID: 34768284 PMCID: PMC8791591 DOI: 10.1182/bloodadvances.2021005532] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/15/2021] [Accepted: 10/22/2021] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Abstract
High gene expression levels of MCT1 are associated with reduced PFS and OS in MM with lenalidomide-based maintenance therapy. Overexpression of MCT1 impairs efficacy of lenalidomide in human myeloma cells in vitro and in vivo.
Biomarkers that predict response to lenalidomide maintenance therapy in patients with multiple myeloma (MM) have remained elusive. We have shown that immunomodulatory drugs (IMiDs) exert anti-MM activity via destabilization of MCT1 and CD147. In this study, cell samples of 654 patients with MM who received lenalidomide (n = 455), thalidomide (n = 98), or bortezomib (n = 101) maintenance were assessed by gene expression profiling and RNA sequencing, followed by correlation of MCT1 and CD147 expression with data for progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). Patients with high expression levels of MCT1 showed significantly reduced PFS (31.9 months vs 48.2 months in MCT1high vs MCT1low; P = .03) and OS (75.9 months vs not reached [NR] in MCT1high vs MCT1low; P = .001) in cases with lenalidomide maintenance, whereas MCT1 expression had no significant impact on PFS or OS in cases with bortezomib maintenance. We validated the predictive role of MCT1 for IMiD-based maintenance in an independent cohort of patients who received thalidomide (OS, 83.6 months vs NR in MCT1high vs MCT1low; P = .03). Functional validation showed that MCT1 overexpression in human MM cell lines significantly reduced the efficacy of lenalidomide, whereas no change was observed with bortezomib treatment, either in vitro or in a MM xenograft model. Our findings have established MCT1 expression as a predictive marker for response to lenalidomide-based maintenance in patients with MM.
Collapse
|
21
|
Sonneveld P, Dimopoulos MA, Beksac M, van der Holt B, Aquino S, Ludwig H, Zweegman S, Zander T, Zamagni E, Wester R, Hajek R, Pantani L, Dozza L, Gay F, Cafro A, De Rosa L, Morelli A, Gregersen H, Gulbrandsen N, Cornelisse P, Troia R, Oliva S, van de Velden V, Wu K, Ypma PF, Bos G, Levin MD, Pour L, Driessen C, Broijl A, Croockewit A, Minnema MC, Waage A, Hveding C, van de Donk NWCJ, Offidani M, Palumbo GA, Spencer A, Boccadoro M, Cavo M. Consolidation and Maintenance in Newly Diagnosed Multiple Myeloma. J Clin Oncol 2021; 39:3613-3622. [PMID: 34520219 DOI: 10.1200/jco.21.01045] [Citation(s) in RCA: 22] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE To address the role of consolidation treatment for newly diagnosed, transplant eligible patients with multiple myeloma in a controlled clinical trial. PATIENTS AND METHODS The EMN02/HOVON95 trial compared consolidation treatment with two cycles of bortezomib, lenalidomide, and dexamethasone (VRD) or no consolidation after induction and intensification therapy, followed by continuous lenalidomide maintenance. Primary study end point was progression-free survival (PFS). RESULTS Eight hundred seventy-eight eligible patients were randomly assigned to receive VRD consolidation (451 patients) or no consolidation (427 patients). At a median follow-up of 74.8 months, median PFS with adjustment for pretreatment was prolonged in patients randomly assigned to VRD consolidation (59.3 v 42.9 months, hazard ratio [HR] = 0.81; 95% CI, 0.68 to 0.96; P = .016). The PFS benefit was observed across most predefined subgroups, including revised International Staging System (ISS) stage, cytogenetics, and prior treatment. Revised ISS3 stage (HR, 2.00; 95% CI, 1.41 to 2.86) and ampl1q (HR, 1.67; 95% CI, 1.37 to 2.04) were significant adverse prognostic factors. The median duration of maintenance was 33 months (interquartile range 13-86 months). Response ≥ complete response (CR) after consolidation versus no consolidation before start of maintenance was 34% versus 18%, respectively (P < .001). Response ≥ CR on protocol including maintenance was 59% with consolidation and 46% without (P < .001). Minimal residual disease analysis by flow cytometry in a subgroup of 226 patients with CR or stringent complete response or very good partial response before start of maintenance demonstrated a 74% minimal residual disease-negativity rate in VRD-treated patients. Toxicity from VRD was acceptable and manageable. CONCLUSION Consolidation treatment with VRD followed by lenalidomide maintenance improves PFS and depth of response in newly diagnosed patients with multiple myeloma as compared to maintenance alone.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Pieter Sonneveld
- Department of Hematology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Meletios A Dimopoulos
- Department of Clinical Therapeutics, School of Medicine, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece
| | - Meral Beksac
- Department of Hematology, Ankara University School of Medicine, Ankara, Turkey
| | - Bronno van der Holt
- Department of Hematology, HOVON Data Center, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Sara Aquino
- IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria San Martino, IST Instituto Nazionale per la Ricerca sul Cancro, Genova, Italy
| | - Heinz Ludwig
- Wilhelminen Cancer Research Institute, c/o Wilhelminenspital, Vienna, Austria
| | - Sonja Zweegman
- Department of Hematology, Amsterdam UMC, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Thilo Zander
- Medical Oncology, Luzerner Kantonshospital, Luzern, Switzerland
| | - Elena Zamagni
- IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna Istituto di Ematologia "Seràgnoli" and Dipartimento di Medicina Specialistica, Diagnostica e Sperimentale Università di Bologna, Bologna, Italy
| | - Ruth Wester
- Department of Hematology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Roman Hajek
- University Hospital Ostrava, Ostrava, Czech Republic
| | - Lucia Pantani
- IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna, Istituto di Ematologia "Seràgnoli," Bologna, Italy
| | - Luca Dozza
- Department of Experimental, Diagnostic and Experimental Medicine, Seràgnoli Institute of Hematology, Bologna University School of Medicine, S. Orsola Malpighi Hospital, Bologna, Italy
| | - Francesca Gay
- Myeloma Unit, Division of Hematology, University of Torino, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Città della Salute e della Scienza, Torino, Italy
| | | | | | - Annamaria Morelli
- Department of Hematology, Transfusion Medicine and Biotechnology Santo Spirito, Civic Hospital, Pescara, Italy
| | - Henrik Gregersen
- Department of Haematology, Aalborg University Hospital, Aalborg, Denmark
| | - Nina Gulbrandsen
- Department of Hematology, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
| | - Petra Cornelisse
- HOVON Data Center, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Rosella Troia
- Myeloma Unit, Division of Hematology, University of Torino, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Città della Salute e della Scienza, Torino, Italy
| | - Stefania Oliva
- Myeloma Unit, Division of Hematology, University of Torino, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Città della Salute e della Scienza, Torino, Italy
| | | | - KaLung Wu
- Department of Hematology, ZNA Stuivenberg, Antwerp, Belgium
| | - Paula F Ypma
- Department of Hematology, Haga Ziekenhuis, The Hague, the Netherlands
| | - Gerard Bos
- Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, the Netherlands
| | | | - Luca Pour
- University Hospital Brno, Brno, Czech Republic
| | - Christoph Driessen
- Department of Oncology/Hematology, Kantonsspital, St Gallen, Switzerland
| | - Annemiek Broijl
- Department of Hematology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Alexandra Croockewit
- Department of Hematology, Radboud University Medical Centre, Nijmegen, the Netherlands
| | - Monique C Minnema
- Department of Hematology, University Medical Centre Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - Anders Waage
- Department of Hematology, St Olav Hospital, Trondheim, Norway
| | | | - Niels W C J van de Donk
- Department of Hematology, Amsterdam UMC, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Massimo Offidani
- Clinica di Ematologia, AOU Ospedali Riuniti di Ancona, Ancona, Italy
| | - Giuseppe A Palumbo
- Department of Scienze Mediche Chirurgiche e Tecnologie Avanzate "G.F. Ingrassia," University of Catania, Catania, Italy
| | - Andrew Spencer
- Department of Haematology, Alfred Hospital-Monash University, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Mario Boccadoro
- Myeloma Unit, Division of Hematology, University of Torino, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Città della Salute e della Scienza, Torino, Italy
| | - Michele Cavo
- IRCCS S.Orsola-Malpighi, Istituto di Ematologia "Seràgnoli," Dipartimento di Medicina Specialistica, Diagnostica e Sperimentale, Università degli Studi di Bologna, Bologna, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Sachpekidis C, Merz M, Raab MS, Bertsch U, Weru V, Kopp-Schneider A, Jauch A, Goldschmidt H, Dimitrakopoulou-Strauss A. The prognostic significance of [ 18F]FDG PET/CT in multiple myeloma according to novel interpretation criteria (IMPeTUs). EJNMMI Res 2021; 11:100. [PMID: 34628525 PMCID: PMC8502185 DOI: 10.1186/s13550-021-00846-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/13/2021] [Accepted: 09/23/2021] [Indexed: 12/26/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE [18F]FDG PET/CT is the elective imaging modality for treatment monitoring in multiple myeloma (MM). However, MM is a heterogeneous disease from an imaging point of view, raising challenges in interpretation of PET/CT. We herein investigated the prognostic role of the novel Italian Myeloma criteria for PET Use (IMPeTUs) in MM patients undergoing high-dose chemotherapy (HDT) followed by autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT). METHODS Forty-seven patients with newly diagnosed MM underwent [18F]FDG PET/CT before commencement of treatment (baseline PET/CT). Thirty-four of them (72.3%) were also examined after completion of ASCT (follow-up PET/CT). PET/CT analysis was based on the IMPeTUs criteria, which take into consideration-among others-the metabolic state of the bone marrow based on the 5-point Deauville score (DS), the number and metabolic state of focal [18F]FDG-avid lesions, as well as the presence of paramedullary disease (PMD) and extramedullary disease (EMD). We analyzed whether parameters from IMPeTUs correlate with clinically relevant parameters and patients' outcome, as assessed by progression-free survival (PFS). RESULTS Median follow-up from baseline and follow-up PET/CT were 85.1 months and 76.7 months, respectively. The number of focal, [18F]FDG-avid lesions significantly correlated with the bone marrow infiltration rate and the R-ISS stage, while the presence of PMD was associated with LDH. After univariate survival analysis, the number of focal, [18F]FDG-avid lesions both before and after therapy as well as the presence of PMD and EMD before therapy adversely affected PFS. Multivariate survival analysis for baseline parameters confirmed that the number of focal, [18F]FDG-avid lesions and the presence of EMD are associated with adverse prognosis, irrespective of the ISS stage and/or the presence of high-risk cytogenetic abnormalities. The 5-point DS of [18F]FDG uptake in reference bone marrow and focal lesions showed a significant decrease as response to treatment, but it did not affect PFS. CONCLUSION Several parameters utilized in IMPeTUs predict PFS in MM patients, suggesting the potentially significant role of the new criteria in patient stratification and response assessment. Additional studies are warranted for the further evaluation of IMPeTUs in the direction of establishment of robust cut-off values with a prognostic significance in the disease.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Christos Sachpekidis
- Clinical Cooperation Unit Nuclear Medicine, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Im Neuenheimer Feld 280, 69210, Heidelberg, Germany.
| | - Maximilian Merz
- Department of Hematology and Cell Therapy, University of Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany.,Department of Internal Medicine V, University Hospital Heidelberg and National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Marc-Steffen Raab
- Department of Internal Medicine V, University Hospital Heidelberg and National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), Heidelberg, Germany.,Clinical Cooperation Unit Molecular Hematology/Oncology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Uta Bertsch
- Department of Internal Medicine V, University Hospital Heidelberg and National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Vivienn Weru
- Division of Biostatistics, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| | | | - Anna Jauch
- Institute of Human Genetics, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Hartmut Goldschmidt
- Department of Internal Medicine V, University Hospital Heidelberg and National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Antonia Dimitrakopoulou-Strauss
- Clinical Cooperation Unit Nuclear Medicine, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Im Neuenheimer Feld 280, 69210, Heidelberg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Long-term follow-up of subcutaneous versus intravenous bortezomib during induction therapy for newly diagnosed multiple myeloma treated within the GMMG-MM5 Phase III Trial. Leukemia 2021; 35:3007-3011. [PMID: 34031532 DOI: 10.1038/s41375-021-01298-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/01/2021] [Revised: 04/23/2021] [Accepted: 05/11/2021] [Indexed: 02/06/2023]
|
24
|
Weinhold N, Salwender HJ, Cairns DA, Raab MS, Waldron G, Blau IW, Bertsch U, Hielscher T, Morgan GJ, Jauch A, Davies FE, Hänel M, Cook G, Scheid C, Houlston R, Goldschmidt H, Jackson G, Kaiser MF. Chromosome 1q21 abnormalities refine outcome prediction in patients with multiple myeloma - a meta-analysis of 2,596 trial patients. Haematologica 2021; 106:2754-2758. [PMID: 34092058 PMCID: PMC8485656 DOI: 10.3324/haematol.2021.278888] [Citation(s) in RCA: 45] [Impact Index Per Article: 15.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/10/2020] [Accepted: 05/21/2021] [Indexed: 11/09/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Niels Weinhold
- Department of Internal Medicine V, University Clinic Heidelberg, Heidelberg.
| | - Hans J Salwender
- Asklepios Tumorzentrum Hamburg, AK Altona and AK St. Georg, Hamburg
| | - David A Cairns
- Clinical Trials Research Unit, Leeds Institute of Clinical Trials Research, Leeds
| | - Marc S Raab
- Department of Internal Medicine V, University Clinic Heidelberg, Heidelberg
| | - George Waldron
- Division of Genetics and Epidemiology, The Institute of Cancer Research, London
| | - Igor W Blau
- Medical Clinic, Charité University Medicine Berlin, Berlin
| | - Uta Bertsch
- Department of Internal Medicine V, University Clinic Heidelberg, Heidelberg
| | - Thomas Hielscher
- Division of Biostatistics, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ) Heidelberg, Heidelberg
| | | | - Anna Jauch
- Institute of Human Genetics, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg
| | | | - Mathias Hänel
- Department of Internal Medicine III, Klinikum Chemnitz, Chemnitz
| | - Gordon Cook
- Leeds Institute of Cancer and Pathology, University of Leeds, Leeds
| | - Christoph Scheid
- Department I of Internal Medicine and Center of Integrated Oncology Cologne Bonn, University of Cologne, Cologne
| | - Richard Houlston
- Division of Genetics and Epidemiology, The Institute of Cancer Research, London
| | - Hartmut Goldschmidt
- Department of Internal Medicine V, University Clinic Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany; National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), University Clinic Heidelberg, Heidelberg
| | - Graham Jackson
- Department of Haematology, University of Newcastle, Newcastle Upon Tyne
| | - Martin F Kaiser
- Division of Genetics and Epidemiology, The Institute of Cancer Research, London, United Kingdom; Department of Haematology, The Royal Marsden Hospital, London.
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Klein EM, Tichy D, Salwender HJ, Mai EK, Duerig J, Weisel KC, Benner A, Bertsch U, Akhavanpoor M, Besemer B, Munder M, Lindemann HW, Hose D, Seckinger A, Luntz S, Jauch A, Elmaagacli A, Fuhrmann S, Brossart P, Goerner M, Bernhard H, Raab MS, Blau IW, Haenel M, Scheid C, Goldschmidt H. Prognostic Impact of Serum Free Light Chain Ratio Normalization in Patients with Multiple Myeloma Treated within the GMMG-MM5 Trial. Cancers (Basel) 2021; 13:cancers13194856. [PMID: 34638344 PMCID: PMC8507729 DOI: 10.3390/cancers13194856] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/31/2021] [Revised: 09/19/2021] [Accepted: 09/22/2021] [Indexed: 11/16/2022] Open
Abstract
Simple Summary For multiple myeloma (MM) patients with measurable disease, there is no recommendation to monitor serum free light chains during therapy. However, this could provide important information in terms of prognosis. We investigated the prognostic impact of serum free light chain ratio (FLCr) normalization in 590 patients with secretory MM during first-line treatment within the German-Speaking Myeloma Multicenter Group MM5 trial. We are able to show that there is an increasing percentage of patients who achieve FLCr normalization during therapy. Importantly, we demonstrate that FLCr normalization at any time before the start of maintenance is significantly associated with prolonged progression-free and overall survival in multivariable time-dependent Cox regression analyses. This suggests that FLCr normalization during therapy is an important and simple way to assess prognostic factor in MM and supports the serial measurement of serum free light chains during therapy, even in patients with secretory MM. Abstract We investigated the prognostic impact of time-dependent serum free light chain ratio (FLCr) normalization in 590 patients with secretory multiple myeloma (MM) during first-line treatment within the German-Speaking Myeloma Multicenter Group MM5 trial. Serum free light chains (sFLC) were assessed by the Freelite test at baseline, after induction, mobilization, autologous blood stem cell transplantation, consolidation and every three months during maintenance or follow up within two years after the start of maintenance. The proportion of patients with a normal or normalized FLCr increased from 3.6% at baseline to 23.2% after induction and 64.7% after consolidation. The achievement of FLCr normalization at any one time before the start of maintenance was associated with significantly prolonged progression-free survival (PFS) (p < 0.01, hazard ratio (HR) = 0.61, 95% confidence interval (95% CI) = 0.47–0.79) and overall survival (OS) (p = 0.02, HR = 0.67, 95% CI = 0.48–0.93) in multivariable time-dependent Cox regression analyses. Furthermore, reaching immune reconstitution, defined as the normalization of uninvolved immunoglobulins, before maintenance was associated with superior PFS (p = 0.04, HR = 0.77, 95% CI = 0.60–0.99) and OS (p = 0.01, HR = 0.59, 95% CI = 0.41–0.86). We conclude that FLCr normalization during therapy is an important favorable prognostic factor in MM. Therefore, we recommend serial measurements of sFLC during therapy until achieving FLCr normalization, even in patients with secretory MM.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Eva-Maria Klein
- Department of Medicine V, Hematology, Oncology and Rheumatology, University of Heidelberg, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany; (E.K.M.); (U.B.); (M.A.); (D.H.); (A.S.); (M.S.R.); (H.G.)
- Department of Internal Medicine 5, Klinikum Nuremberg, Paracelsus Medical University, 90419 Nuremberg, Germany
- Correspondence: ; Tel.: +49-911-398-114957
| | - Diana Tichy
- Division of Biostatistics, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), 69120 Heidelberg, Germany; (D.T.); (A.B.)
| | - Hans J. Salwender
- Asklepios Tumorzentrum Hamburg, AK Altona and AK St. Georg, 22763 Hamburg, Germany;
| | - Elias K. Mai
- Department of Medicine V, Hematology, Oncology and Rheumatology, University of Heidelberg, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany; (E.K.M.); (U.B.); (M.A.); (D.H.); (A.S.); (M.S.R.); (H.G.)
| | - Jan Duerig
- Department of Hematology, University Clinic Essen, 45147 Essen, Germany;
| | - Katja C. Weisel
- Department of Oncology, Hematology and Bone Marrow Transplantation with Section of Pneumology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, 20246 Hamburg, Germany;
| | - Axel Benner
- Division of Biostatistics, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), 69120 Heidelberg, Germany; (D.T.); (A.B.)
| | - Uta Bertsch
- Department of Medicine V, Hematology, Oncology and Rheumatology, University of Heidelberg, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany; (E.K.M.); (U.B.); (M.A.); (D.H.); (A.S.); (M.S.R.); (H.G.)
- National Center for Tumor Diseases, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Mabast Akhavanpoor
- Department of Medicine V, Hematology, Oncology and Rheumatology, University of Heidelberg, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany; (E.K.M.); (U.B.); (M.A.); (D.H.); (A.S.); (M.S.R.); (H.G.)
| | - Britta Besemer
- Department of Hematology, Oncology and Immunology, University Hospital Tübingen, 72076 Tübingen, Germany;
| | - Markus Munder
- Department of Internal Medicine III, University Medical Center Mainz, 55131 Mainz, Germany;
| | - Hans-Walter Lindemann
- Department of Hematology and Oncology, Katholisches Krankenhaus Hagen, 58097 Hagen, Germany;
| | - Dirk Hose
- Department of Medicine V, Hematology, Oncology and Rheumatology, University of Heidelberg, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany; (E.K.M.); (U.B.); (M.A.); (D.H.); (A.S.); (M.S.R.); (H.G.)
| | - Anja Seckinger
- Department of Medicine V, Hematology, Oncology and Rheumatology, University of Heidelberg, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany; (E.K.M.); (U.B.); (M.A.); (D.H.); (A.S.); (M.S.R.); (H.G.)
| | - Steffen Luntz
- Coordination Centre for Clinical Trials (KKS) Heidelberg, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany;
| | - Anna Jauch
- Institute of Human Genetics, University of Heidelberg, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany;
| | - Ahmet Elmaagacli
- Department of Hematology and Oncology, Asklepios Hospital Hamburg St. Georg, 20099 Hamburg, Germany;
| | - Stephan Fuhrmann
- Department of Hematology and Oncology, Helios Hospital Berlin Buch, 13125 Berlin, Germany;
| | - Peter Brossart
- Department of Internal Medicine, Oncology, Hematology, Immuno-Oncology and Rheumatology/Clinical Immunology, University Hospital Bonn, 53127 Bonn, Germany;
| | - Martin Goerner
- Department of Hematology, Oncology and Palliative Care, Klinikum Bielefeld, 33604 Bielefeld, Germany;
| | - Helga Bernhard
- Internal Medicine V, Klinikum Darmstadt, 64283 Darmstadt, Germany;
| | - Marc S. Raab
- Department of Medicine V, Hematology, Oncology and Rheumatology, University of Heidelberg, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany; (E.K.M.); (U.B.); (M.A.); (D.H.); (A.S.); (M.S.R.); (H.G.)
| | - Igor W. Blau
- Medical Clinic, Charité University Medicine Berlin, 13353 Berlin, Germany;
| | - Mathias Haenel
- Department of Internal Medicine III, Klinikum Chemnitz, 09116 Chemnitz, Germany;
| | - Christof Scheid
- Department of Internal Medicine I, University Hospital Cologne, 50937 Cologne, Germany;
| | - Hartmut Goldschmidt
- Department of Medicine V, Hematology, Oncology and Rheumatology, University of Heidelberg, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany; (E.K.M.); (U.B.); (M.A.); (D.H.); (A.S.); (M.S.R.); (H.G.)
- National Center for Tumor Diseases, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
| | | |
Collapse
|
26
|
Maintenance Strategies for Myeloma: Is Bigger Always Better? Cancer J 2021; 27:231-238. [PMID: 34549912 DOI: 10.1097/ppo.0000000000000524] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
Abstract
ABSTRACT Over the last decade, several very important prospective randomized controlled trials have confirmed the significant survival benefit conferred by maintenance therapies. Owing to these developments, the role of continued maintenance in the optimal management strategies of newly diagnosed myeloma patients (both transplant-eligible and transplant-ineligible) has been strongly cemented. In dealing with an incurable disease such as myeloma, whether to offer maintenance is no longer as relevant a question as it was before, but which antimyeloma agent or agents to use, as maintenance remains more pertinent today. More importantly, a personalized risk-stratified maintenance approach for an individual patient to yield the best benefit for that specific patient is yet to be uniformly adapted. In this article, we review the available and evolving clinical data leading to our current-day practices, and we make an effort to describe what lies ahead.
Collapse
|
27
|
Jones JR, Pawlyn C, Jackson GH. Safety of lenalidomide for maintenance treatment of patients with multiple myeloma following autologous stem cell transplantation. Expert Opin Drug Saf 2021; 20:1137-1145. [PMID: 34184970 DOI: 10.1080/14740338.2021.1945578] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/21/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Myeloma is the second most common hematological cancer, with 5800 cases per year diagnosed in the UK. Despite improved treatment it is still considered non-curable, although the median survival has increased from 3 to 8 years over the past 20 years. Treatment involves the use of induction therapy and consolidation with autologous stem cell transplant (ASCT) in patients deemed fit enough. Further attempts to improve outcomes include the use of maintenance therapy. AREAS COVERED This review details all trials in which lenalidomide has been used as maintenance following ASCT. PubMed searches included randomized control trials, observational cohort, reviews, and meta-analysis. EXPERT OPINION Lenalidomide is a well-tolerated, oral agent that is associated with increased overall and progression free survival when used as maintenance following ASCT. Its use in this setting is FDA and EMA approved and is standard of care in Europe and North America. The early link between lenalidomide and second hematological cancers appears to be associated with use in combination with melphalan. There is an increase in non-melanoma skin cancers and solid tumors in the elderly but this has minimal impact on mortality. Lenalidomide use as part of combination maintenance is underway and may further improve outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- John R Jones
- Brighton and Sussex Medical School, Brighton, UK.,Department of Haematology, Eastbourne District General Hospital, Eastbourne, UK.,Department of Haematology, King's College Hospital, London, UK
| | - Charlotte Pawlyn
- The Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK.,Royal Marsden Hospital, London, UK
| | | |
Collapse
|
28
|
Oliva S, Bruinink DHO, Rihova L, D'Agostino M, Pantani L, Capra A, van der Holt B, Troia R, Petrucci MT, Villanova T, Vsianska P, Jugooa R, Brandt-Hagens C, Gilestro M, Offidani M, Ribolla R, Galli M, Hajek R, Gay F, Cavo M, Omedé P, van der Velden VHJ, Boccadoro M, Sonneveld P. Minimal residual disease assessment by multiparameter flow cytometry in transplant-eligible myeloma in the EMN02/HOVON 95 MM trial. Blood Cancer J 2021; 11:106. [PMID: 34083504 PMCID: PMC8175611 DOI: 10.1038/s41408-021-00498-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 30] [Impact Index Per Article: 10.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/16/2021] [Revised: 03/25/2021] [Accepted: 04/12/2021] [Indexed: 12/19/2022] Open
Abstract
Minimal residual disease (MRD) by multiparameter flow cytometry (MFC) is the most effective tool to define a deep response in multiple myeloma (MM). We conducted an MRD correlative study of the EMN02/HO95 MM phase III trial in newly diagnosed MM patients achieving a suspected complete response before maintenance and every 6 months during maintenance. Patients received high-dose melphalan (HDM) versus bortezomib-melphalan-prednisone (VMP) intensification, followed by bortezomib-lenalidomide-dexamethasone (VRd) versus no consolidation, and lenalidomide maintenance. Bone marrow (BM) samples were processed in three European laboratories, applying EuroFlow-based MFC protocols (eight colors, two tubes) with 10-4-10-5 sensitivity. At enrollment in the MRD correlative study, 76% (244/321) of patients were MRD-negative. In the intention-to-treat analysis, after a median follow-up of 75 months, 5-year progression-free survival was 66% in MRD-negative versus 31% in MRD-positive patients (HR 0.39; p < 0.001), 5-year overall survival was 86% versus 69%, respectively (HR 0.41; p < 0.001). MRD negativity was associated with reduced risk of progression or death in all subgroups, including ISS-III (HR 0.37) and high-risk fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) patients (HR 0.38;). In the 1-year maintenance MRD population, 42% of MRD-positive patients at pre-maintenance became MRD-negative after lenalidomide exposure. In conclusion, MRD by MFC is a strong prognostic factor. Lenalidomide maintenance further improved MRD-negativity rate.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Stefania Oliva
- Myeloma Unit, Division of Hematology, University of Torino, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Città della Salute e della Scienza di Torino, Torino, Italy.
| | - Davine Hofste Op Bruinink
- Department of Hematology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
- Laboratory Medical Immunology, Department of Immunology, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Lucie Rihova
- Department of Clinical Hematology, University Hospital Brno, Brno, Czech Republic
| | - Mattia D'Agostino
- Myeloma Unit, Division of Hematology, University of Torino, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Città della Salute e della Scienza di Torino, Torino, Italy
| | - Lucia Pantani
- Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna, Seràgnoli Institute of Hematology, Department of Experimental, Diagnostic and Specialty Medicine, Bologna University School of Medicine, S Orsola Malpighi Hospital, Bologna, Italy
| | - Andrea Capra
- Myeloma Unit, Division of Hematology, University of Torino, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Città della Salute e della Scienza di Torino, Torino, Italy
| | - Bronno van der Holt
- HOVON Data Center, Department of Hematology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Rossella Troia
- Myeloma Unit, Division of Hematology, University of Torino, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Città della Salute e della Scienza di Torino, Torino, Italy
| | - Maria Teresa Petrucci
- Hematology, Department of Translational and Precision Medicine, Azienda Ospedaliera Policlinico Umberto I, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy
| | - Tania Villanova
- Myeloma Unit, Division of Hematology, University of Torino, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Città della Salute e della Scienza di Torino, Torino, Italy
| | - Pavla Vsianska
- Department of Clinical Hematology, University Hospital Brno, Brno, Czech Republic
| | - Romana Jugooa
- Department of Immunology, Laboratory Medical Immunology, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Claudia Brandt-Hagens
- Department of Immunology, Laboratory Medical Immunology, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Milena Gilestro
- Myeloma Unit, Division of Hematology, University of Torino, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Città della Salute e della Scienza di Torino, Torino, Italy
| | - Massimo Offidani
- Clinica di Ematologia, Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria Ospedali Riuniti Umberto I-G.M. Lancisi-G. Salesi di Ancona, Ancona, Italy
| | - Rossella Ribolla
- Division of Hematology, ASST Spedali Civili di Brescia, Brescia, Italy
| | - Monica Galli
- Dipartimento di Oncologia ed Ematologia, ASST Papa Giovanni XXIII, Bergamo, Italy
| | - Roman Hajek
- Department of Haematooncology, University Hospital Ostrava, Ostrava, Czech Republic
- Faculty of Medicine, University of Ostrava, Ostrava, Czech Republic
| | - Francesca Gay
- Myeloma Unit, Division of Hematology, University of Torino, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Città della Salute e della Scienza di Torino, Torino, Italy
| | - Michele Cavo
- Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna, Seràgnoli Institute of Hematology, Department of Experimental, Diagnostic and Specialty Medicine, Bologna University School of Medicine, S Orsola Malpighi Hospital, Bologna, Italy
| | - Paola Omedé
- Myeloma Unit, Division of Hematology, University of Torino, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Città della Salute e della Scienza di Torino, Torino, Italy
| | - Vincent H J van der Velden
- Department of Immunology, Laboratory Medical Immunology, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Mario Boccadoro
- Myeloma Unit, Division of Hematology, University of Torino, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Città della Salute e della Scienza di Torino, Torino, Italy
| | - Pieter Sonneveld
- Department of Hematology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
Ozaki S, Handa H, Koiso H, Saitoh T, Sunami K, Ishida T, Suzuki K, Narita T, Iida S, Nakamura Y, Suzuki K, Nishimura N, Murakami H, Shimizu K. Propensity-score matched analysis of the efficacy of maintenance/continuous therapy in newly diagnosed patients with multiple myeloma: a multicenter retrospective collaborative study of the Japanese Society of Myeloma. J Cancer Res Clin Oncol 2021; 148:191-203. [PMID: 34080068 DOI: 10.1007/s00432-021-03668-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/06/2021] [Accepted: 05/17/2021] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Maintenance ± consolidation or continuous therapy is considered a standard of care for both transplant-eligible and -ineligible patients with multiple myeloma (MM). However, long-term benefits of such therapy have not yet been clarified in the context of clinical practice. PURPOSE To clarify the efficacy of maintenance/continuous approach, we retrospectively analyzed the cohort data of newly diagnosed MM patients by propensity-score matching based on age, gender, revised International Staging System (R-ISS) stage, and implementation of transplantation to reduce the bias due to confounding variables. FINDINGS Among 720 patients, 161 were identified for each of the maintenance and no maintenance groups. Maintenance/continuous therapy employed immunomodulatory drugs (n = 83), proteasome inhibitors (n = 48), combination of both (n = 29), or dexamethasone alone (n = 1). Progression-free survival (PFS) was significantly prolonged in the maintenance group compared with the no maintenance group (median 37.7 and 21.9 months, p = 0.0002, respectively). Prolongation of PFS was observed in both transplanted and non-transplanted patients (p = 0.017 and p = 0.0008, respectively), with standard risk (p < 0.00001), R-ISS stage I (p = 0.037) and stage II (p = 0.00094), and those without obtaining complete response (p = 0.0018). There was no significant benefit in overall survival (OS), but it tended to be better in the maintenance group in non-transplanted patients. Regarding the treatment pattern, the substitution or addition of drugs different from the induction therapy and the combination with immunomodulatory drugs and proteasome inhibitors appeared to be more beneficial for PFS but not OS. CONCLUSION These results support the benefit of current maintenance/continuous approach in routine clinical practice in the management of MM.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shuji Ozaki
- Department of Hematology, Tokushima Prefectural Central Hospital, 1-10-3 Kuramoto, Tokushima, 770-8539, Japan.
| | - Hiroshi Handa
- Department of Hematology, Gunma University Graduate School of Medicine, Gunma, Japan
| | - Hiromi Koiso
- Infection Control and Prevention Center, Gunma University Hospital, Gunma, Japan
| | - Takayuki Saitoh
- Department of Laboratory Sciences, Gunma University Graduate School of Health Sciences, Gunma, Japan
| | - Kazutaka Sunami
- Department of Hematology, National Hospital Organization Okayama Medical Center, Okayama, Japan
| | - Tadao Ishida
- Department of Hematology, Japanese Red Cross Medical Center, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Kenshi Suzuki
- Department of Hematology, Japanese Red Cross Medical Center, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Tomoko Narita
- Department of Hematology and Oncology, Nagoya City University Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Nagoya, Japan
| | - Shinsuke Iida
- Department of Hematology and Oncology, Nagoya City University Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Nagoya, Japan
| | - Yuichi Nakamura
- Department of Hematology, Saitama Medical University Hospital, Saitama, Japan
| | - Kazuhito Suzuki
- Department of Clinical Oncology/Hematology, The Jikei University Kashiwa Hospital, Kashiwa, Japan
| | - Noriko Nishimura
- Division of Hematology Oncology, Cancer Institute Hospital of the Japanese Society for Cancer Research, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Hirokazu Murakami
- Faculty of Medical Technology and Clinical Engineering, Gunma University of Health and Welfare, Gunma, Japan
| | - Kazuyuki Shimizu
- Department of Hematology/Oncology, Higashi Nagoya National Hospital, Nagoya, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
30
|
Future Directions in Maintenance Therapy in Multiple Myeloma. J Clin Med 2021; 10:jcm10112261. [PMID: 34073689 PMCID: PMC8197068 DOI: 10.3390/jcm10112261] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/01/2021] [Revised: 05/17/2021] [Accepted: 05/20/2021] [Indexed: 12/23/2022] Open
Abstract
Autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) has been a backbone of therapy for newly diagnosed patients with multiple myeloma eligible for high-dose therapy for decades. Survival outcomes have continued to improve over time, in part because of the incorporation of highly effective induction regimens prior to ASCT as well as post-ASCT maintenance therapy. Randomized phase III clinical trials have helped establish lenalidomide maintenance as a standard of care. However, as nearly all patients will eventually experience disease relapse, there continues to be significant interest in developing novel maintenance strategies to improve upon lenalidomide maintenance. In this review, we summarize the available evidence for the use of immunomodulatory drugs, proteasome inhibitors, and monoclonal antibodies as post-ASCT maintenance therapies as well as discuss future directions and unanswered questions in the field.
Collapse
|
31
|
Cost-Effectiveness of Post-Autotransplant Lenalidomide in Persons with Multiple Myeloma. Mediterr J Hematol Infect Dis 2021; 13:e2021034. [PMID: 34007422 PMCID: PMC8114895 DOI: 10.4084/mjhid.2021.034] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/20/2021] [Accepted: 04/12/2021] [Indexed: 11/08/2022] Open
Abstract
Considerable data indicate post-transplant lenalidomide prolongs progression-free survival and probably survival after an autotransplant for multiple myeloma (MM). However, optimal therapy duration is unknown, controversial and differs in the EU and US. We compared outcomes and cost-effectiveness of 3 post-transplant lenalidomide strategies in EU and US settings: (1) none; (2) until failure; and (3) 2-year fixed duration. We used a Markov decision model, which included six health states and informed by published data. The model estimated the lenalidomide strategy given to failure achieved 1.06 quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) at costs per QALY gained of €29,232 in the EU and $133,401 in the US settings. Two-year fixed-duration lenalidomide averted €7,286 per QALY gained in the EU setting and saved 0.84 QALYs at $60,835 per QALY gained in the US setting. These highly divergent costs per QALY in the EU and US settings resulted from significant differences in post-transplant lenalidomide costs and 2nd-line therapies driven by whether post-transplant failure was on or off-lenalidomide. In Monte Carlo simulation analyses which allowed us to account for the variability of inputs, 2-year fixedduration lenalidomide remained the preferred strategy for improving healthcare sustainability in the EU and US settings.
Collapse
|
32
|
Vaxman I, Gertz MA. Measurable residual disease in multiple myeloma and light chain amyloidosis: more than meets the eye. Leuk Lymphoma 2021; 62:1544-1553. [PMID: 33508994 DOI: 10.1080/10428194.2021.1873320] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/19/2022]
Abstract
The emergence of highly effective multiple myeloma (MM) treatments may bring cure within reach and highlights the need for highly sensitive measurable residual disease (MRD) techniques to replace conventional response assessments. MRD is being incorporated as an endpoint in an increasing number of studies and had been repeatedly shown to be both a predictive marker of response to treatment and a prognostic marker for future relapse. However, those results should be cautiously interpreted due to non-uniform reporting and the need for longer follow up to assess for sustained MRD negativity. This review aims to critically analyze the key MRD aspects including the current evidence supporting the use of MRD in clinical practice and the pitfalls of the various methods used to assess MRD. The utility of MRD for light chain (AL) amyloidosis will also be discussed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Iuliana Vaxman
- Division of Hematology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.,Institute of Hematology, Davidoff Cancer Center, Rabin Medical Center, Petah-Tikvah, Israel.,Sackler Faculty of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel
| | - Morie A Gertz
- Division of Hematology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| |
Collapse
|
33
|
Lenalidomide versus bortezomib maintenance after frontline autologous stem cell transplantation for multiple myeloma. Blood Cancer J 2021; 11:1. [PMID: 33414374 PMCID: PMC7791127 DOI: 10.1038/s41408-020-00390-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 20] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/16/2020] [Revised: 10/29/2020] [Accepted: 11/10/2020] [Indexed: 12/22/2022] Open
Abstract
Lenalidomide (LEN) maintenance (MT) post autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) is standard of care in newly diagnosed multiple myeloma (MM) but has not been compared to other agents in clinical trials. We retrospectively compared bortezomib (BTZ; n = 138) or LEN (n = 183) MT from two subsequent GMMG phase III trials. All patients received three cycles of BTZ-based triplet induction and post-ASCT MT. BTZ MT (1.3 mg/m2 i.v.) was administered every 2 weeks for 2 years. LEN MT included two consolidation cycles (25 mg p.o., days 1–21 of 28 day cycles) followed by 10–15 mg/day for 2 years. The BTZ cohort more frequently received tandem ASCT (91% vs. 33%) due to different tandem ASCT strategies. In the LEN and BTZ cohort, 43% and 46% of patients completed 2 years of MT as intended (p = 0.57). Progression-free survival (PFS; HR = 0.83, p = 0.18) and overall survival (OS; HR = 0.70, p = 0.15) did not differ significantly with LEN vs. BTZ MT. Patients with <nCR after first ASCT were assigned tandem ASCT in both trials. In patients with <nCR and tandem ASCT (LEN: n = 54 vs. BTZ: n = 84), LEN MT significantly improved PFS (HR = 0.61, p = 0.04) but not OS (HR = 0.46, p = 0.09). In conclusion, the significant PFS benefit after eliminating the impact of different tandem ASCT rates supports the current standard of LEN MT after ASCT.
Collapse
|
34
|
Acute Liver Rejection in a Multiple Myeloma Patient Treated with Lenalidomide. Case Rep Transplant 2020; 2020:8894922. [PMID: 33381347 PMCID: PMC7749773 DOI: 10.1155/2020/8894922] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/23/2020] [Revised: 12/02/2020] [Accepted: 12/05/2020] [Indexed: 01/13/2023] Open
Abstract
Herein we present a patient that underwent a liver transplant due to primary biliary cholangitis (PBC) and after 9 years developed multiple myeloma. Following the cessation of mycophenolate mofetil and 2 weeks after lenalidomide treatment was started, the patient experienced acute cellular rejection. The patient recovered after treatment with corticosteroids, resumption of mycophenolate mofetil, and cessation of lenalidomide. Lenalidomide-associated allograft rejection has been reported in other organs. However, this is the first case report of liver rejection induced by lenalidomide.
Collapse
|
35
|
Risk and Response-Adapted Treatment in Multiple Myeloma. Cancers (Basel) 2020; 12:cancers12123497. [PMID: 33255368 PMCID: PMC7760158 DOI: 10.3390/cancers12123497] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/30/2020] [Revised: 11/19/2020] [Accepted: 11/22/2020] [Indexed: 12/28/2022] Open
Abstract
Simple Summary Therapeutic strategies in multiple myeloma have been adapted only to age and comorbidities for a long time. Given the currently available therapeutic and technologic arsenal, the time may have come to refine this adaptation. First, high-risk patients should benefit from the most intensive and efficient combinations from diagnosis. Here, we review these different strategies and how to define and identify high-risk myeloma patients in current clinical practice. In addition, the advent of technologies detecting minimal residual disease gives us this opportunity to define the quality of response to treatment with an unpreceded sensitivity and adapt treatment accordingly. Finally, even if molecular targeting is still nascent in myeloma, some molecular features are interesting to detect at relapse to determine optimal salvage treatments. Abstract Myeloma therapeutic strategies have been adapted to patients’ age and comorbidities for a long time. However, although cytogenetics and clinical presentations (plasmablastic cytology; extramedullary disease) are major prognostic factors, until recently, all patients received the same treatment whatever their initial risk. No strong evidence allows us to use a personalized treatment according to one cytogenetic abnormality in newly diagnosed myeloma. Retrospective studies showed a benefit of a double autologous transplant in high-risk cytogenetics according to the International Myeloma Working Group definition (t(4;14), t(14;16) or del(17p)). Moreover, this definition has to be updated since other independent abnormalities, namely gain 1q, del(1p32), and trisomies 5 or 21, as well as TP53 mutations, are also prognostic. Another very strong predictive tool is the response to treatment assessed by the evaluation of minimal residual disease (MRD). We are convinced that the time has come to use it to adapt the strategy to a dynamic risk. Many trials are ongoing to answer many questions: when and how should we adapt the therapy, its intensity and duration. Nevertheless, we also have to take into account the clinical outcome for one patient, especially adverse events affecting his or her quality of life and his or her preferences for continuous/fixed duration treatment.
Collapse
|
36
|
Moreau P, Hebraud B, Facon T, Leleu X, Hulin C, Hashim M, Hu Y, Caillot D, Benboubker L, Zweegman S, Merz M, Weisel K, Salwender H, Mai EK, Goldschmidt H, Bertsch U, Vanquickelberghe V, Kampfenkel T, Boer CD, Krotneva S, Proskorovsky I, He J, Lam A, Lee C, Cote S, Sonneveld P. Front-line daratumumab-VTd versus standard-of-care in ASCT-eligible multiple myeloma: matching-adjusted indirect comparison. Immunotherapy 2020; 13:143-154. [PMID: 33228440 DOI: 10.2217/imt-2020-0266] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/21/2022] Open
Abstract
Aim: To compare daratumumab plus standard-of-care (SoC; bortezomib/thalidomide/dexamethasone [VTd]) and VTd alone with other SoC for transplant-eligible newly diagnosed multiple myeloma. Patients & methods: We conducted an unanchored matching-adjusted indirect comparison of progression-free and overall survival (PFS/OS) with D-VTd/VTd versus bortezomib/lenalidomide/dexamethasone (VRd), bortezomib/cyclophosphamide/dexamethasone (VCd) and bortezomib/dexamethasone (Vd). Results: After matching adjustment, significant improvements in PFS were estimated for D-VTd versus VRd (hazard ratio [HR]: 0.47 [95% CI: 0.33-0.69]), VCd (HR: 0.35 [95% CI: 0.21-0.58]) and Vd (HR: 0.42 [95% CI: 0.28-0.63]). OS was significantly longer with D-VTd versus VRd (HR: 0.31 [95% CI: 0.16-0.57]), VCd (HR: 0.35 [95% CI: 0.14-0.86]) and Vd (HR: 0.38 [95% CI: 0.18-0.77]). No significant PFS/OS differences were seen for VTd versus other SoC. Conclusion: This analysis supports front-line daratumumab for transplant-eligible newly diagnosed multiple myeloma.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Philippe Moreau
- Service d'Hématologie Clinique, University Hospital Hôtel-Dieu, Nantes 44000, France
| | - Benjamin Hebraud
- Institut Universitaire du Cancer-Oncopole & Centre de Recherches en Cancerologie de Toulouse, Toulouse 31100, France
| | - Thierry Facon
- University of Lille, CHU Lille, Service des Maladies du Sang, Lille 59000, France
| | - Xavier Leleu
- CHU Poitiers - Hôpital la Milétrie, Poitiers 86021, France
| | - Cyrille Hulin
- Department of Hematology, Hospital Haut Leveque, University Hospital Bordeaux, Bordeaux 33600, France
| | | | - Yannan Hu
- Ingress Health, Rotterdam, 3012 NJ, The Netherlands
| | - Denis Caillot
- Hôpital Du Bocage, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Dijon, Dijon 21000, France
| | - Lofti Benboubker
- Hôpital de Bretonneau, Centre Hospitalier Régional Universitaire de Tours, Tours 37000, France
| | - Sonja Zweegman
- Department of Hematology, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam 1182 DB, The Netherlands
| | - Maximilian Merz
- University Hospital Heidelberg, Internal Medicine V & National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), Heidelberg 69120, Germany
| | - Katja Weisel
- University Medical Center of Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg 20251, Germany
| | - Hans Salwender
- Asklepios Tumorzentrum Hamburg, AK Altona & AK St. Georg, Hamburg 20099, Germany
| | - Elias K Mai
- Department of Internal Medicine V, University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg 69120, Germany
| | - Hartmut Goldschmidt
- University Hospital Heidelberg, Internal Medicine V & National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), Heidelberg 69120, Germany
| | - Uta Bertsch
- University Hospital Heidelberg, Internal Medicine V & National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), Heidelberg 69120, Germany
| | | | | | - Carla de Boer
- Janssen Research & Development, LLC, Leiden 2333, The Netherlands
| | | | | | - Jianming He
- Janssen Global Services, Raritan, NJ 08869, USA
| | - Annette Lam
- Janssen Global Services, Raritan, NJ 08869, USA
| | | | - Sarah Cote
- Janssen Global Services, Raritan, NJ 08869, USA
| | - Pieter Sonneveld
- Erasmus University Medical Center Cancer Institute, Rotterdam 3015 GD, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
37
|
Fenk R, Giagounidis A, Goldschmidt H, Heinsch M, Rummel M, Kroger N, Boquoi A, Lopez D, Gerrlich C, Baier J, Liesenjohann S, Hauck K, Savickaite I, Mai EK, Aul C, Strapatsas J, Dienst A, Kondakci M, Haas R, Kobbe G. Efficacy and Tolerability of High- versus Low-dose Lenalidomide Maintenance Therapy of Multiple Myeloma after Autologous Blood Stem Cell Transplantation. Clin Cancer Res 2020; 26:5879-5886. [PMID: 32817078 DOI: 10.1158/1078-0432.ccr-20-0841] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/04/2020] [Revised: 05/28/2020] [Accepted: 08/14/2020] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE For multiple myeloma, high-dose chemotherapy and autologous blood stem-cell transplantation (ASCT) followed by lenalidomide maintenance (LenMT) at 10-15 mg/day is considered standard of care. However, dose reductions due to side effects are common and median LenMT doses achieved over time may remain lower. Dose response during LenMT has never been investigated. PATIENTS AND METHODS In a multicenter, randomized, open-label trial, patients with multiple myeloma after ASCT and high-dose lenalidomide consolidation therapy (CT) at 25 mg/day were randomized to receive LenMT at either 25 or 5 mg/day. Primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS). RESULTS Ninety-four patients (median age, 58 years) were randomized to either arm, with 22% having International Staging System (ISS) stage 3 and 22% being in complete remission (CR). After median follow-up of 46.7 months, median doses of 14.5 and 5 mg/day were achieved in the two arms; 53% of dose reductions occurring during CT. In the high- and the low-dose arm, median PFS was 44.8 and 33.0 months (HR, 0.65; 95% CI, 0.44-0.97; P = 0.032), 36% and 23% of patients had stringent CR as best response (P = 0.08), and 4-year OS was 79% and 67% (P = 0.16), respectively. Hematologic toxicity, grade ≥3 neutropenia, and infections were initially more common with LenMT 25 mg, but decreased after dose adjustments. SPM incidence and quality-of-life (QoL) scores in both arms were similar. CONCLUSIONS LenMT dose correlated with efficacy and toxicity. High rates of dose reductions during CT argue against a high starting dose. However, continuous up- and down-titration for each patient to the current maximum tolerated dose is prudent.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Roland Fenk
- University Hospital Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany.
| | | | - Hartmut Goldschmidt
- University Hospital Heidelberg and National Center for Tumor Diseases Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | | | | | | | | | - David Lopez
- University Hospital Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany
| | | | - Julia Baier
- University Hospital Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany
| | | | | | | | - Elias K Mai
- University Hospital Heidelberg and National Center for Tumor Diseases Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Carlo Aul
- Helios St. Johannis Hospital Duisburg, Duisburg, Germany
| | | | | | | | - Rainer Haas
- University Hospital Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany
| | - Guido Kobbe
- University Hospital Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
38
|
Merz M, Dechow T, Scheytt M, Schmidt C, Hackanson B, Knop S. The clinical management of lenalidomide-based therapy in patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma. Ann Hematol 2020; 99:1709-1725. [PMID: 32296915 PMCID: PMC7340649 DOI: 10.1007/s00277-020-04023-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/31/2019] [Accepted: 04/04/2020] [Indexed: 02/06/2023]
Abstract
Lenalidomide is an integral, yet evolving, part of current treatment pathways for both transplant-eligible and transplant-ineligible patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma (NDMM). It is approved in combination with dexamethasone as first-line therapy for transplant-ineligible patients with NDMM, and as maintenance treatment following autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT). Although strong clinical trial evidence has supported the integration of lenalidomide into current treatment paradigms for NDMM, applying those paradigms to individual patients and determining which patients are most likely to benefit from lenalidomide treatment are more complex. In this paper, we utilize the available clinical trial evidence to provide recommendations for patient selection and lenalidomide dosing in both the first-line setting in patients ineligible for ASCT and the maintenance setting in patients who have undergone ASCT. In addition, we provide guidance on management of those adverse events that are most commonly associated with lenalidomide treatment, and consider the optimal selection and sequencing of next-line agents following long-term frontline or maintenance treatment with lenalidomide.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Maximilian Merz
- Department of Internal Medicine V, Multiple Myeloma Division, Heidelberg University Medical Center, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Tobias Dechow
- Private Oncology Practice Ravensburg, Ravensburg, Germany
| | - Mithun Scheytt
- Department of Internal Medicine II, Hematology and Medical Oncology Division, Würzburg University Medical Center, Würzburg, Germany
| | - Christian Schmidt
- Grosshadern University Hospital, Department of Internal Medicine III, University Hospital of Ludwig Maximilians University, Munich, Germany
| | - Bjoern Hackanson
- Department of Internal Medicine II and ICCA, Augsburg University Hospital, Augsburg, Germany
| | - Stefan Knop
- Department of Internal Medicine II, Hematology and Medical Oncology Division, Würzburg University Medical Center, Würzburg, Germany.
| |
Collapse
|
39
|
Mai EK, Miah K, Bertsch U, Dürig J, Scheid C, Weisel KC, Kunz C, Munder M, Lindemann HW, Merz M, Hose D, Jauch A, Seckinger A, Luntz S, Sauer S, Fuhrmann S, Brossart P, Elmaagacli A, Goerner M, Bernhard H, Hoffmann M, Raab MS, Blau IW, Hänel M, Benner A, Salwender HJ, Goldschmidt H. Bortezomib-based induction, high-dose melphalan and lenalidomide maintenance in myeloma up to 70 years of age. Leukemia 2020; 35:809-822. [PMID: 32684633 PMCID: PMC8318883 DOI: 10.1038/s41375-020-0976-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/29/2020] [Revised: 06/29/2020] [Accepted: 07/06/2020] [Indexed: 01/03/2023]
Abstract
Intensive upfront therapy in newly-diagnosed multiple myeloma (MM) including induction therapy (IT), high-dose melphalan (MEL200), and autologous blood stem cell transplantation (ASCT) followed by consolidation and/or maintenance is mostly restricted to patients up to 65 years of age. Prospective phase III trial data in the era of novel agents for patients up to 70 years of age are not available. The GMMG-MM5 trial included 601 patients between 18 and 70 years of age, divided in three groups for the present analysis: ≤60 years (S1, n = 353), 61–65 years (S2, n = 107) and 66–70 years (S3, n = 141). Treatment consisted of a bortezomib-containing IT, MEL200/ASCT, consolidation, and maintenance with lenalidomide. Adherence to treatment was similar among patients of the three age groups. Overall toxicity during all treatment phases was increased in S2 and S3 compared to S1 (any adverse event/any serious adverse event: S1:81.7/41.8% vs. S2:90.7/56.5% vs. S3:87.2/68.1%, p = 0.05/<0.001). With respect to progression-free survival (log-rank p = 0.73), overall survival (log-rank p = 0.54) as well as time-to-progression (Gray’s p = 0.83) and non-relapse mortality (Gray’s p = 0.25), no differences were found between the three age groups. Our results imply that an intensive upfront therapy with a bortezomib-containing IT, MEL200/ASCT, lenalidomide consolidation, and maintenance should be applied to transplant-eligible MM patients up to 70 years of age.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Elias K Mai
- Department of Internal Medicine V, University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany.,National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT) Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Kaya Miah
- Division of Biostatistics, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Uta Bertsch
- Department of Internal Medicine V, University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany.,National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT) Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Jan Dürig
- Department of Hematology, University Clinic Essen, Essen, Germany
| | - Christof Scheid
- Department of Internal Medicine I, University Hospital Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - Katja C Weisel
- Department of Oncology, Hematology and Bone Marrow Transplantation with Section of Pneumology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.,Department of Hematology, Oncology and Immunology, University Hospital Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany
| | - Christina Kunz
- Division of Biostatistics, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany.,Institute of Child Nutrition, Max Rubner Institute, Federal Research Institute of Nutrition and Food, Karlsruhe, Germany
| | - Markus Munder
- Department of Internal Medicine III, University Medical Center Mainz, Mainz, Germany
| | - Hans-Walter Lindemann
- Department of Hematology and Oncology, Katholisches Krankenhaus Hagen, Hagen, Germany
| | - Maximilian Merz
- Department of Internal Medicine V, University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Dirk Hose
- Department of Internal Medicine V, University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Anna Jauch
- Institute of Human Genetics, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Anja Seckinger
- Department of Internal Medicine V, University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Steffen Luntz
- Coordination Centre for Clinical Trials, University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Sandra Sauer
- Department of Internal Medicine V, University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Stephan Fuhrmann
- Department of Hematology and Oncology, Helios Hospital Berlin Buch, Berlin, Germany
| | | | - Ahmet Elmaagacli
- Department of Hematology and Oncology, Asklepios Hospital Hamburg St. Georg, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Martin Goerner
- Department of Hematology, Oncology and Palliative Care, Klinikum Bielefeld, Bielefeld, Germany
| | - Helga Bernhard
- Department of Internal Medicine V, Klinikum Darmstadt, Darmstadt, Germany
| | - Martin Hoffmann
- Medical Clinic A, Klinikum Ludwigshafen, Ludwigshafen, Germany
| | - Marc S Raab
- Department of Internal Medicine V, University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Igor W Blau
- Medical Clinic, Charité University Medicine Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Mathias Hänel
- Department of Internal Medicine III, Klinikum Chemnitz, Chemnitz, Germany
| | - Axel Benner
- Division of Biostatistics, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Hans J Salwender
- Department of Hematology and Oncology, Asklepios Hospital Hamburg Altona, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Hartmut Goldschmidt
- Department of Internal Medicine V, University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany. .,National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT) Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany.
| | | |
Collapse
|
40
|
Maclachlan K, Diamond B, Maura F, Hillengass J, Turesson I, Landgren CO, Kazandjian D. Second malignancies in multiple myeloma; emerging patterns and future directions. Best Pract Res Clin Haematol 2020; 33:101144. [PMID: 32139010 PMCID: PMC7544243 DOI: 10.1016/j.beha.2020.101144] [Citation(s) in RCA: 29] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/30/2019] [Accepted: 01/09/2020] [Indexed: 12/20/2022]
Abstract
The changing landscape of treatment options for multiple myeloma has led to a higher proportion of patients achieving deep, long-lasting responses to therapy. With the associated improvement in overall survival, the development of subsequent second malignancies has become of increased significance. The risk of second malignancy after multiple myeloma is affected by a combination of patient-, disease- and therapy-related risk factors. This review discusses recent data refining our knowledge of these contributing factors, including current treatment modalities which increase risk (i.e. high-dose melphalan with autologous stem cell transplant and lenalidomide maintenance therapy). We highlight emerging data towards individualized risk- and response-adapted treatment strategies and discuss key areas requiring future research.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kylee Maclachlan
- Myeloma Service, Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA.
| | - Benjamin Diamond
- Myeloma Service, Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Francesco Maura
- Myeloma Service, Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Jens Hillengass
- Section of Multiple Myeloma, Department of Medicine, Roswell Park Comprehensive Cancer Center, Buffalo, NY, USA
| | - Ingemar Turesson
- Department of Hematology, Skane University Hospital, Malmo, Sweden
| | - C Ola Landgren
- Myeloma Service, Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Dickran Kazandjian
- Multiple Myeloma Program, Center for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA
| |
Collapse
|