Identifying IGH disease clones for MRD monitoring in childhood B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia using RNA-Seq

The Evolving Landscape of Flowcytometric Minimal Residual Disease Monitoring in B-Cell Precursor Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia

Detection of minimal residual disease (MRD) is a major independent prognostic marker in the clinical management of pediatric and adult B-cell precursor Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia (BCP-ALL), and risk stratification nowadays heavily relies on MRD diagnostics. MRD can be detected using flow cytometry based on aberrant expression of markers (antigens) during malignant B-cell maturation. Recent advances highlight the significance of novel markers (e.g., CD58, CD81, CD304, CD73, CD66c, and CD123), improving MRD identification. Second and next-generation flow cytometry, such as the EuroFlow consortium's eight-color protocol, can achieve sensitivities down to 10-5 (comparable with the PCR-based method) if sufficient cells are acquired. The introduction of targeted therapies (especially those targeting CD19, such as blinatumomab or CAR-T19) introduces several challenges for flow cytometric MRD analysis, such as the occurrence of CD19-negative relapses. Therefore, innovative flow cytometry panels, including alternative B-cell markers (e.g., CD22 and CD24), have been designed. (Semi-)automated MRD assessment, employing machine learning algorithms and clustering tools, shows promise but does not yet allow robust and sensitive automated analysis of MRD. Future directions involve integrating artificial intelligence, further automation, and exploring multicolor spectral flow cytometry to standardize MRD assessment and enhance diagnostic and prognostic robustness of MRD diagnostics in BCP-ALL.

Current assessment and management of measurable residual disease in patients with acute lymphoblastic leukemia in the setting of CAR-T-cell therapy

ABSTRACT

Chimeric antigen receptor (CAR)-modified T-cell therapy has achieved remarkable success in the treatment of acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL). Measurable/minimal residual disease (MRD) monitoring plays a significant role in the prognostication and management of patients undergoing CAR-T-cell therapy. Common MRD detection methods include flow cytometry (FCM), polymerase chain reaction (PCR), and next-generation sequencing (NGS), and each method has advantages and limitations. It has been well documented that MRD positivity predicts a poor prognosis and even disease relapse. Thus, how to perform prognostic evaluations, stratify risk based on MRD status, and apply MRD monitoring to guide individual therapeutic decisions have important implications in clinical practice. This review assesses the common and novel MRD assessment methods. In addition, we emphasize the critical role of MRD as a prognostic biomarker and summarize the latest studies regarding MRD-directed combination therapy with CAR-T-cell therapy and allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT), as well as other therapeutic strategies to improve treatment effect. Furthermore, this review discusses current challenges and strategies for MRD detection in the setting of disease relapse after targeted therapy.

Minimal residual disease detection by next-generation sequencing of different immunoglobulin gene rearrangements in pediatric B-ALL

While the prognostic role of immunoglobulin heavy chain locus (IGH) rearrangement in minimal residual disease (MRD) in pediatric B-acute lymphoblastic leukemia (B-ALL) has been reported, the contribution of light chain loci (IGK/IGL) remains elusive. This study is to evaluate the prognosis of IGH and IGK/IGL rearrangement-based MRD detected by next-generation sequencing in B-ALL at the end of induction (EOI) and end of consolidation (EOC). IGK/IGL rearrangements identify 5.5% of patients without trackable IGH clones. Concordance rates for IGH and IGK/IGL are 79.9% (cutoff 0.01%) at EOI and 81.0% (cutoff 0.0001%) at EOC, respectively. Patients with NGS-MRD < 0.01% at EOI or <0.0001% at EOC present excellent outcome, with 3-year event-free survival rates higher than 95%. IGH-MRD is prognostic at EOI/EOC, while IGK-MRD at EOI/EOC and IGL-MRD at EOI are not. At EOI, NGS identifies 26.2% of higher risk patients whose MRD < 0.01% by flow cytometry. However, analyzing IGK/IGL along with IGH fails to identify additional higher risk patients both at EOI and at EOC. In conclusion, IGH is crucial for MRD monitoring while IGK and IGL have relatively limited value.

NGS better discriminates true MRD positivity for the risk stratification of childhood ALL treated on an MRD-based protocol

We compared minimal/measurable residual disease (MRD) levels evaluated by routinely used real-time quantitative polymerase chain reaction (qPCR) patient-specific assays and by next-generation sequencing (NGS) approach in 780 immunoglobulin (IG) and T-cell receptor (TR) markers in 432 children with B-cell precursor acute lymphoblastic leukemia treated on the AIEOP-BFM ALL 2009 protocol. Our aim was to compare the MRD-based risk stratification at the end of induction. The results were concordant in 639 of 780 (81.9%) of these markers; 37 of 780 (4.7%) markers were detected only by NGS. In 104 of 780 (13.3%) markers positive only by qPCR, a large fraction (23/104; 22.1%) was detected also by NGS, however, owing to the presence of identical IG/TR rearrangements in unrelated samples, we classified those as nonspecific/false-positive. Risk group stratification based on the MRD results by qPCR and NGS at the end of induction was concordant in 76% of the patients; 19% of the patients would be assigned to a lower risk group by NGS, largely owing to the elimination of false-positive qPCR results, and 5% of patients would be assigned to a higher risk group by NGS. NGS MRD is highly concordant with qPCR while providing more specific results and can be an alternative in the front line of MRD evaluation in forthcoming MRD-based protocols.

Oncogenic lesions and molecular subtypes in adults with B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia

B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia (B-ALL), a genetically heterogeneous disease, is classified into different molecular subtypes that are defined by recurrent gene rearrangements, gross chromosomal abnormalities, or specific gene mutations. Cells with these genetic alterations acquire a leukemia-initiating ability and show unique expression profiles. The distribution of B-ALL molecular subtypes is greatly dependent on age, which also affects treatment responsiveness and long-term survival, partly accounting for the inferior outcome in adolescents and young adults (AYA) and (older) adults with B-ALL. Recent advances in sequencing technology, especially RNA sequencing and the application of these technologies in large B-ALL cohorts have uncovered B-ALL molecular subtypes prevalent in AYA and adults. These new insights supply more precise estimations of prognoses and targeted therapies informed by sequencing results, as well as a deeper understanding of the genetic basis of AYA/adult B-ALL. This article provides an account of these technological advances and an overview of the recent major findings of B-ALL molecular subtypes in adults.

Digital PCR for Minimal Residual Disease Quantitation Using Immunoglobulin/T-Cell Receptor Gene Rearrangements in Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia: A Proposed Analytic Algorithm

In minimal residual disease (MRD), where there are exceedingly low target copy numbers, digital PCR (dPCR) can improve MRD quantitation. However, standards for dPCR MRD interpretation in acute lymphoblastic leukemia are lacking. Here, for immunoglobulin/T-cell receptor-based MRD, we propose an objective, statistics-based analytic algorithm. In 161 postinduction samples from 79 children with acute lymphoblastic leukemia, MRD was performed by dPCR and real-time quantitative PCR (qPCR) using the same markers and primer-probe sets. The dPCR raw data were analyzed by using an automated algorithm. dPCR and qPCR results were highly concordant (P < 0.0001): 98% (50 of 51) of qPCR positive were positive by dPCR, whereas 95% (61 of 64) of qPCR negative results were also negative by dPCR. For MRD quantitation, both qPCR and dPCR were tightly correlated (R² = 0.94). Using more DNA (1 μg × 7 versus 630 ng × 3), dPCR improved sensitivity of MRD quantitation by one log₁₀ (median MRD positive cutoff 1.6 × 10^-5). With dPCR, 83% (29 of 35) of positive-not-quantifiable results by qPCR could be assigned positive/negative MRD status. Seven replicates of tested samples and negative controls were optimal. Compared with qPCR, dPCR could improve MRD sensitivity by one log₁₀. We proposed an automatable, statistics-based algorithm that minimized interoperator variance for dPCR MRD.

Immunoglobulin/T-Cell Receptor Gene Rearrangement Analysis Using RNA-Seq

Identification of immunoglobulin (IG) and T-cell receptor (TR) gene rearrangements in acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) patients at initial presentation are crucial for monitoring of minimal residual disease (MRD) during subsequent follow-up and thereby for appropriate risk-group stratification. Here we describe how RNA-Seq data can be generated and subsequently analyzed with ARResT/Interrogate to identify possible MRD markers. In addition to the procedures, possible pitfalls will be discussed. Similar strategies can be employed for other lymphoid malignancies, such as lymphoma and myeloma.

Elucidating minimal residual disease of paediatric B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukaemia by single-cell analysis

Minimal residual disease that persists after chemotherapy is the most valuable prognostic marker for haematological malignancies and solid cancers. Unfortunately, our understanding of the resistance elicited in minimal residual disease is limited due to the rarity and heterogeneity of the residual cells. Here we generated 161,986 single-cell transcriptomes to analyse the dynamic changes of B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukaemia (B-ALL) at diagnosis, residual and relapse by combining single-cell RNA sequencing and B-cell-receptor sequencing. In contrast to those at diagnosis, the leukaemic cells at relapse tended to shift to poorly differentiated states, whereas the changes in the residual cells were more complicated. Differential analyses highlighted the activation of the hypoxia pathway in residual cells, resistant clones and B-ALL with MLL rearrangement. Both in vitro and in vivo models demonstrated that inhibition of the hypoxia pathway sensitized leukaemic cells to chemotherapy. This single-cell analysis of minimal residual disease opens up an avenue for the identification of potent treatment opportunities for B-ALL.

Distinct clinical characteristics of DUX4- and PAX5-altered childhood B-lymphoblastic leukemia

Despite poor end-of-induction MRD, DUX4 B-ALL has excellent outcome.

PAX5alt B-ALL with IKZF1 codeletion is associated with poor outcome, which can be improved by treatment intensification.

Among the recently described subtypes in childhood B-lymphoblastic leukemia (B-ALL) were DUX4- and PAX5-altered (PAX5alt). By using whole transcriptome RNA sequencing in 377 children with B-ALL from the Malaysia-Singapore ALL 2003 (MS2003) and Malaysia-Singapore ALL 2010 (MS2010) studies, we found that, after hyperdiploid and ETV6-RUNX1, the third and fourth most common subtypes were DUX4 (n = 51; 14%) and PAX5alt (n = 36; 10%). DUX4 also formed the largest genetic subtype among patients with poor day-33 minimal residual disease (MRD; n = 12 of 44). But despite the poor MRD, outcome of DUX4 B-ALL was excellent (5-year cumulative risk of relapse [CIR], 8.9%; 95% confidence interval [CI], 2.8%-19.5% and 5-year overall survival, 97.8%; 95% CI, 85.3%-99.7%). In MS2003, 21% of patients with DUX4 B-ALL had poor peripheral blood response to prednisolone at day 8, higher than other subtypes (8%; P = .03). In MS2010, with vincristine at day 1, no day-8 poor peripheral blood response was observed in the DUX4 subtype (P = .03). The PAX5alt group had an intermediate risk of relapse (5-year CIR, 18.1%) but when IKZF1 was not deleted, outcome was excellent with no relapse among 23 patients. Compared with MS2003, outcome of PAX5alt B-ALL with IKZF1 codeletion was improved by treatment intensification in MS2010 (5-year CIR, 80.0% vs 0%; P = .05). In conclusion, despite its poor initial response, DUX4 B-ALL had a favorable overall outcome, and the prognosis of PAX5alt was strongly dependent on IKZF1 codeletion.

Practical Considerations for Using RNA Sequencing in Management of B-Cell Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia: Malaysia-Singapore Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia-Sequencing 2020 Implementation Strategy

Despite the immense genetic heterogeneity of B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL), RNA sequencing (RNA-Seq) could comprehensively interrogate its genetic drivers, assigning a specific molecular subtype in >90% of patients. However, study groups have only started to use RNA-Seq. For broader clinical use, technical, quality control, and appropriate performance validation are needed. We describe the development and validation of an RNA-Seq workflow for subtype classification, TPMT/NUDT15/TP53 variant discovery, and IGH disease clone identification for Malaysia-Singapore ALL sequencing (ALL-Seq) 2020. We validated this workflow in 377 patients in our preceding Malaysia-Singapore ALL-Seq 2003/Malaysia-Singapore ALL-Seq 2010 studies and proposed the quality control measures for RNA quality, library size, sequencing, and data analysis using the International Organization for Standardization 15189 quality and competence standard for medical laboratories. Compared with conventional methods, we achieved >95% accuracy in oncogene fusion identification, digital karyotyping, and TPMT and NUDT15 variant discovery. We found seven pathogenic TP53 mutations, confirmed with Sanger sequencing, which conferred a poorer outcome. Applying this workflow prospectively to the first 21 patients in Malaysia-Singapore ALL-Seq 2020, we identified the genetic drivers and IGH disease clones in >90% of patients with concordant TPMT, NUDT15, and TP53 variants using PCR-based methods. The median turnaround time was 12 days, which was clinically actionable. In conclusion, RNA-Seq workflow could be used clinically in management of B-cell ALL patients.

Comparison of Two Quantitative PCR-Based Assays for Detection of Minimal Residual Disease in B-Precursor Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia Harboring Three Major Fusion Transcripts

Two quantitative PCR (qPCR)-based methods, for clonal Ig or T-cell receptor gene (Ig/TCR) rearrangements and for fusion transcripts, are widely used for the measurement of minimal residual disease (MRD) in patients with B-precursor acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL). MRD of bone marrow samples from 165 patients carrying the three major fusion transcripts, including 74 BCR-ABL1, 54 ETV6-RUNX1, and 37 TCF3-PBX1, was analyzed by using the two qPCR-based methods. The coefficient correlation of both methods was good for TCF3-PBX1 (R² = 0.8088) and BCR-ABL1 (R² = 0.8094) ALL and moderate for ETV6-RUNX1 (R² = 0.5972). The concordance was perfect for TCF3-PBX1 ALL (97.2%), substantially concordant for ETV6-RUNX1 ALL (87.1%), and only moderate for BCR-ABL1 ALL (70.6%). The discordant MRD, positive for only one method with a difference greater than one log, was found in 4 of 93 samples (4.3%) with ETV6-RUNX1, 31 of 245 samples (12.7%) with BCR-ABL1, and 0 of TCF3-PBX1 ALL. None of the eight nontransplanted patients with BCR-ABL1-MRD (+)/Ig/TCR-MRD (-) with a median follow-up time of 73.5 months had hematologic relapses. Our study showed an excellent MRD concordance between the two qPCR-based methods in TCF3-PBX1 ALL, whereas qPCR for Ig/TCR is more reliable in BCR-ABL1 ALL.

Minimal Residual Disease in Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia: Current Practice and Future Directions

Simple Summary

Acute lymphoblastic leukemia minimal residual disease (MRD) refers to the presence of residual leukemia cells following the achievement of complete remission, but below the limit of detection using conventional morphologic assessment. Up to two thirds of children may have MRD detectable after induction therapy depending on the biological subtype and method of detection. Patients with detectable MRD have an increased likelihood of relapse. A rapid reduction of MRD reveals leukemia sensitivity to therapy and under this premise, MRD has emerged as the strongest independent predictor of individual patient outcome and is crucial for risk stratification. However, it is a poor surrogate for treatment effect on long term outcome at the trial level, with impending need of randomized trials to prove efficacy of MRD-adapted interventions.

Abstract

Acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) is the most common pediatric cancer and advances in its clinical and laboratory biology have grown exponentially over the last few decades. Treatment outcome has improved steadily with over 90% of patients surviving 5 years from initial diagnosis. This success can be attributed in part to the development of a risk stratification approach to identify those subsets of patients with an outstanding outcome that might qualify for a reduction in therapy associated with fewer short and long term side effects. Likewise, recognition of patients with an inferior prognosis allows for augmentation of therapy, which has been shown to improve outcome. Among the clinical and biological variables known to impact prognosis, the kinetics of the reduction in tumor burden during initial therapy has emerged as the most important prognostic variable. Specifically, various methods have been used to detect minimal residual disease (MRD) with flow cytometric and molecular detection of antigen receptor gene rearrangements being the most common. However, many questions remain as to the optimal timing of these assays, their sensitivity, integration with other variables and role in treatment allocation of various ALL subgroups. Importantly, the emergence of next generation sequencing assays is likely to broaden the use of these assays to track disease evolution. This review will discuss the biological basis for utilizing MRD in risk assessment, the technical approaches and limitations of MRD detection and its emerging applications.

Perspective: sensitive detection of residual lymphoproliferative disease by NGS and clonal rearrangements-how low can you go?

Malignant lymphoproliferative disorders collectively constitute a large fraction of the hematological cancers, ranging from indolent to highly aggressive neoplasms. Being a diagnostically important hallmark, clonal gene rearrangements of the immunoglobulins enable the detection of residual disease in the clinical course of patients down to a minute fraction of malignant cells. The introduction of next-generation sequencing (NGS) has provided unprecedented assay specificity, with a sensitivity matching that of polymerase chain reaction-based measurable residual disease (MRD) detection down to the 10^-6 level. Although reaching 10^-6 to 10^-7 is theoretically feasible, employing a sufficient amount of DNA and sequencing coverage is placed in the perspective of the practical challenges when relying on clinical samples in contrast to controlled serial dilutions. As we discuss, the randomness of subsampling must be taken into account to accommodate the sensitivity threshold-in terms of both the required number of cells and sequencing coverage. As a substantial part of the reviewed studies do not state the depth of coverage or even amount of DNA in some cases, we call for increased transparency to enable critical assessment of the MRD assays for clinical implementation and feasibility.

Emerging molecular subtypes and therapeutic targets in B-cell precursor acute lymphoblastic leukemia

B-cell precursor acute lymphoblastic leukemia (BCP-ALL) is characterized by genetic alterations with high heterogeneity. Precise subtypes with distinct genomic and/or gene expression patterns have been recently revealed using high-throughput sequencing technology. Most of these profiles are associated with recurrent non-overlapping rearrangements or hotspot point mutations that are analogous to the established subtypes, such as DUX4 rearrangements, MEF2D rearrangements, ZNF384/ZNF362 rearrangements, NUTM1 rearrangements, BCL2/MYC and/or BCL6 rearrangements, ETV6-RUNX1-like gene expression, PAX5alt (diverse PAX5 alterations, including rearrangements, intragenic amplifications, or mutations), and hotspot mutations PAX5 (p.Pro80Arg) with biallelic PAX5 alterations, IKZF1 (p.Asn159Tyr), and ZEB2 (p.His1038Arg). These molecular subtypes could be classified by gene expression patterns with RNA-seq technology. Refined molecular classification greatly improved the treatment strategy. Multiagent therapy regimens, including target inhibitors (e.g., imatinib), immunomodulators, monoclonal antibodies, and chimeric antigen receptor T-cell (CAR-T) therapy, are transforming the clinical practice from chemotherapy drugs to personalized medicine in the field of risk-directed disease management. We provide an update on our knowledge of emerging molecular subtypes and therapeutic targets in BCP-ALL.

Measurable residual disease of acute lymphoblastic leukemia in allograft settings: how to evaluate and intervene

INTRODUCTION

Allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT) remains a curable strategy for acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL), especially for adult cases. However, leukemia relapse after allograft restricts the improvement of transplant outcomes. Measurable residual disease (MRD) has been the strongest predictor for relapse after allo-HSCT, allowing MRD-directed preemptive therapy.

AREAS COVERED

This manuscript summarizes the detection of MRD in patients with ALL who undergo allo-HSCT, focusing the effects of positive pre-HSCT MRD and post-HSCT MRD on outcomes as well as MRD-directed interventions.

EXPERT OPINION

Except for MFC and RQ-PCR, other strategies, such as next-generation sequencing and RNAseq, have been developed for MRD determination. Negative effects of positive MRD peri-transplantation on outcomes of ALL patients were observed both in human leukocyte antigen (HLA)-matched sibling donor transplantation and in alternative donor transplantation. Advances have been made in determining the need for transplant according to MRD evaluation after induction or consolidation therapy. A number of approaches, including CAR-T-cell therapy, antibodies (blinatumomab, etc), targeted therapy (imatinib, etc), transplant donor selection, as well as donor lymphocyte infusion and interferon-α, have been successfully used or are promising for peri-transplantation MRD interventions. This progress could lead to the significant improvement of transplant outcomes for ALL patients.