CARM1 inhibition reduces histone acetyltransferase activity causing synthetic lethality in CREBBP/EP300-mutated lymphomas

Arginine methylation and respiratory disease

Arginine methylation, a vital post-translational modification, plays a pivotal role in numerous cellular functions such as signal transduction, DNA damage response and repair, regulation of gene transcription, mRNA splicing, and protein interactions. Central to this modification is the role of protein arginine methyltransferases (PRMTs), which have been increasingly recognized for their involvement in the pathogenesis of various respiratory diseases. This review begins with an exploration of the biochemical underpinnings of arginine methylation, shedding light on the intricate molecular regulatory mechanisms governed by PRMTs. It then delves into the impact of arginine methylation and the dysregulation of arginine methyltransferases in diverse pulmonary disorders. Concluding with a focus on the therapeutic potential and recent advancements in PRMT inhibitors, this article aims to offer novel perspectives and therapeutic avenues for the management and treatment of respiratory diseases.

The emerging role of CARM1 in cancer

Coactivator-associated arginine methyltransferase 1 (CARM1), pivotal for catalyzing arginine methylation of histone and non-histone proteins, plays a crucial role in developing various cancers. CARM1 was initially recognized as a transcriptional coregulator by orchestrating chromatin remodeling, transcription regulation, mRNA splicing and stability. This diverse functionality contributes to the recruitment of transcription factors that foster malignancies. Going beyond its established involvement in transcriptional control, CARM1-mediated methylation influences a spectrum of biological processes, including the cell cycle, metabolism, autophagy, redox homeostasis, and inflammation. By manipulating these physiological functions, CARM1 becomes essential in critical processes such as tumorigenesis, metastasis, and therapeutic resistance. Consequently, it emerges as a viable target for therapeutic intervention and a possible biomarker for medication response in specific cancer types. This review provides a comprehensive exploration of the various physiological functions of CARM1 in the context of cancer. Furthermore, we discuss potential CARM1-targeting pharmaceutical interventions for cancer therapy.

Blocking CXCR4-CARM1-YAP axis overcomes osteosarcoma doxorubicin resistance by suppressing aerobic glycolysis

Osteosarcoma, recognized for its aggressiveness and resistance to chemotherapy, notably doxorubicin, poses significant treatment challenges. This comprehensive study investigated the CXCR4-CARM1-YAP signaling axis and its pivotal function in controlling aerobic glycolysis, which plays a crucial role in doxorubicin resistance. Detailed analysis of Dox-resistant 143b/MG63-DoxR cells has uncovered the overexpression of CXCR4. Utilizing a combination of molecular biology techniques including gene silencing, aerobic glycolysis assays such as Seahorse experiments, RNA sequencing, and immunofluorescence staining. The study provides insight into the mechanistic pathways involved. Results demonstrated that disrupting CXCR4 expression sensitizes cells to doxorubicin-induced apoptosis and alters glycolytic activity. Further RNA sequencing revealed that CARM1 modulated this effect through its influence on glycolysis, with immunofluorescence of clinical samples confirming the overexpression of CXCR4 and CARM1 in drug-resistant tumors. Chromatin immunoprecipitation studies further highlighted the role of CARM1, showing it to be regulated by methylation at the H3R17 site, which in turn affected YAP expression. Crucially, in vivo experiments illustrated that CARM1 overexpression could counteract the tumor growth suppression that resulted from CXCR4 inhibition. These insights revealed the intricate mechanisms at play in osteosarcoma resistance to doxorubicin and pointed toward potential new therapeutic strategies that could target this metabolic and signaling network to overcome drug resistance and improve patient outcomes.

CARM1 phosphorylation at S595 by p38γ MAPK drives ROS-mediated cellular senescence

CARM1 is predominantly localized in the nucleus and plays a pivotal role in maintaining mitochondrial homeostasis by regulating gene expression. It suppresses mitochondrial biogenesis by downregulating PGC-1α and TFAM expression, while promoting mitochondrial fission through increased DNM1L expression. Under oxidative stress, CARM1 translocates to the cytoplasm, where it directly methylates DRP1 and accelerates mitochondrial fission, enhancing reactive oxygen species (ROS) production. Cytoplasmic localization of CARM1 is facilitated by its phosphorylation at S595 by ROS-activated p38γ MAPK, creating a positive feedback loop. Consequently, cytoplasmic CARM1 contributes to cellular senescence by altering mitochondrial dynamics and increasing ROS levels. This observation was supported by the increased cytoplasmic CARM1 levels and disrupted mitochondrial dynamics in the transformed 10T1/2 cells. Moreover, CARM1 inhibitors not only inhibit the proliferation of cancer cells but also induce apoptotic death in senescent cells. These findings highlight the potential of CARM1 inhibitors, particularly those targeting cytoplasmic functions, as novel strategies for eliminating cancer and senescent cells.

Targeting AURKA to induce synthetic lethality in CREBBP-deficient B-cell malignancies via attenuation of MYC expression

Loss-of-function mutations in CREBBP, which encodes for a histone acetyltransferase, occur frequently in B-cell malignancies, highlighting CREBBP deficiency as an attractive therapeutic target. Using established isogenic cell models, we demonstrated that CREBBP-deficient cells are selectively vulnerable to AURKA inhibition. Mechanistically, we found that co-targeting CREBBP and AURKA suppressed MYC transcriptionally and post-translationally to induce replication stress and apoptosis. Inhibition of AURKA dramatically decreased MYC protein level in CREBBP-deficient cells, implying a dependency on AURKA to sustain MYC stability. Furthermore, in vivo studies showed that pharmacological inhibition of AURKA was efficacious in delaying tumor progression in CREBBP-deficient cells and was synergistic with CREBBP inhibitors in CREBBP-proficient cells. Our study sheds light on a novel synthetic lethal interaction between CREBBP and AURKA, indicating that targeting AURKA represents a potential therapeutic strategy for high-risk B-cell malignancies harboring CREBBP inactivating mutations.

NEAT1 repression by MED12 creates chemosensitivity in p53 wild-type breast cancer cells

Breast cancer is often treated with chemotherapy. However, the development of chemoresistance results in treatment failure. Long non-coding RNA nuclear paraspeckle assembly transcript 1 (NEAT1) has been shown to contribute to chemoresistance in breast cancer cells. In studying the transcriptional regulation of NEAT1 using multi-omics approaches, we showed that NEAT1 is up-regulated by 5-fluorouracil in breast cancer cells with wild-type cellular tumor antigen p53 but not in mutant-p53-expressing breast cancer cells. The regulation of NEAT1 involves mediator complex subunit 12 (MED12)-mediated repression of histone acetylation marks at the promoter region of NEAT1. Knockdown of MED12 but not coactivator-associated arginine methyltransferase 1 (CARM1) induced histone acetylation at the NEAT1 promoter, leading to elevated NEAT1 mRNAs, resulting in a chemoresistant phenotype. The MED12-dependent regulation of NEAT1 differs between wild-type and mutant p53-expressing cells. MED12 depletion led to increased expression of NEAT1 in a wild-type p53 cell line, but decreased expression in a mutant p53 cell line. Chemoresistance caused by MED12 depletion can be partially rescued by NEAT1 knockdown in p53 wild-type cells. Collectively, our study reveals a novel mechanism of chemoresistance dependent on MED12 transcriptional regulation of NEAT1 in p53 wild-type breast cancer cells.

Androgen receptor cofactors: A potential role in understanding prostate cancer

Prostate cancer (PCa) is witnessing a concerning rise in incidence annually, with the androgen receptor (AR) emerging as a pivotal contributor to its growth and progression. Mounting evidence underscores the AR's ability to recruit cofactors, influencing downstream gene transcription and thereby fueling the proliferation and metastasis of PCa cells. Although, clinical strategies involving AR antagonists provide some relief, managing castration resistant prostate cancer (CRPC) remains a formidable challenge. Thus, the need of the hour lies in unearthing new drugs or therapeutic targets to effectively combat PCa. This review encapsulates the pivotal roles played by coactivators and corepressors of AR, notably androgen receptor-associated protein (ARA) and steroid receptor Coactivators (SRC) in PCa. Our data unveils how these cofactors intricately modulate histone modifications, cell cycling, SUMOylation, and apoptosis through their interactions with AR. Among the array of cofactors scrutinised, such as ARA70β, ARA24, ARA160, ARA55, ARA54, PIAS1, PIAS3, SRC1, SRC2, SRC3, PCAF, p300/CBP, MED1, and CARM1, several exhibit upregulation in PCa. Conversely, other cofactors like ARA70α, PIASy, and NCoR/SMRT demonstrate downregulation. This duality underscores the complexity of AR cofactor dynamics in PCa. Based on our findings, we propose that manipulating cofactor regulation to modulate AR function holds promise as a novel therapeutic avenue against advanced PCa. This paradigm shift offers renewed hope in the quest for effective treatments in the face of CRPC's formidable challenges.

Promising role of protein arginine methyltransferases in overcoming anti-cancer drug resistance

Drug resistance remains a major challenge in cancer treatment, necessitating the development of novel strategies to overcome it. Protein arginine methyltransferases (PRMTs) are enzymes responsible for epigenetic arginine methylation, which regulates various biological and pathological processes, as a result, they are attractive therapeutic targets for overcoming anti-cancer drug resistance. The ongoing development of small molecules targeting PRMTs has resulted in the generation of chemical probes for modulating most PRMTs and facilitated clinical treatment for the most advanced oncology targets, including PRMT1 and PRMT5. In this review, we summarize various mechanisms underlying protein arginine methylation and the roles of specific PRMTs in driving cancer drug resistance. Furthermore, we highlight the potential clinical implications of PRMT inhibitors in decreasing cancer drug resistance. PRMTs promote the formation and maintenance of drug-tolerant cells via several mechanisms, including altered drug efflux transporters, autophagy, DNA damage repair, cancer stem cell-related function, epithelial-mesenchymal transition, and disordered tumor microenvironment. Multiple preclinical and ongoing clinical trials have demonstrated that PRMT inhibitors, particularly PRMT5 inhibitors, can sensitize cancer cells to various anti-cancer drugs, including chemotherapeutic, targeted therapeutic, and immunotherapeutic agents. Combining PRMT inhibitors with existing anti-cancer strategies will be a promising approach for overcoming anti-cancer drug resistance. Furthermore, enhanced knowledge of the complex functions of arginine methylation and PRMTs in drug resistance will guide the future development of PRMT inhibitors and may help identify new clinical indications.

Coactivator-associated arginine methyltransferase 1: A versatile player in cell differentiation and development

Protein arginine methylation is a common post-translational modification involved in the regulation of various cellular functions. Coactivator-associated arginine methyltransferase 1 (CARM1) is a protein arginine methyltransferase that asymmetrically dimethylates histone H3 and non-histone proteins to regulate gene transcription. CARM1 has been found to play important roles in cell differentiation and development, cell cycle progression, autophagy, metabolism, pre-mRNA splicing and transportation, and DNA replication. In this review, we describe the molecular characteristics of CARM1 and summarize its roles in the regulation of cell differentiation and development in mammals.

Histone regulator KAT2A acts as a potential biomarker related to tumor microenvironment and prognosis of diffuse large B cell lymphoma

BACKGROUND

Recent studies have indicated that epigenetic alterations contribute significantly to lymphoma pathogenesis. A type of epigenetic regulation known as histone acetylation plays a crucial role in transcriptional regulation in eukaryotic cells. Specifically, a significant effect of histone acetylation modifications on the abnormal progression and microenvironment of diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) has been observed.

METHODS

To provide insight into the significance of histone acetylation-related genes, we developed a HAscore model for analyzing histone acetylation patterns in DLBCL samples. Furthermore, KAT2A, a regulator of histone acetylation, was knocked down in DLBCL cell lines to investigate its role in proliferation, cell cycle, and apoptosis.

RESULTS

The HAscore model has been demonstrated to provide insight into the significance of these patterns, showing that patients with a low HAscore have distinct tumor immune microenvironments and poorer prognoses. Besides, KAT2A was identified as a potential biomarker related to immune infiltration and malignant pathways in DLBCL.

CONCLUSION

According to these findings, it is evident that the histone acetylation pattern score model is helpful in describing the immune status of DLBCL and that KAT2A may be used as a biomarker for its treatment.

CARM1 arginine methyltransferase as a therapeutic target for cancer

Coactivator-associated arginine methyltransferase 1 (CARM1) is an arginine methyltransferase that posttranslationally modifies proteins that regulate multiple levels of RNA production and processing. Its substrates include histones, transcription factors, coregulators of transcription, and splicing factors. CARM1 is overexpressed in many different cancer types, and often promotes transcription factor programs that are co-opted as drivers of the transformed cell state, a process known as transcription factor addiction. Targeting these oncogenic transcription factor pathways is difficult but could be addressed by removing the activity of the key coactivators on which they rely. CARM1 is ubiquitously expressed, and its KO is less detrimental in embryonic development than deletion of the arginine methyltransferases protein arginine methyltransferase 1 and protein arginine methyltransferase 5, suggesting that therapeutic targeting of CARM1 may be well tolerated. Here, we will summarize the normal in vivo functions of CARM1 that have been gleaned from mouse studies, expand on the transcriptional pathways that are regulated by CARM1, and finally highlight recent studies that have identified oncogenic properties of CARM1 in different biological settings. This review is meant to kindle an interest in the development of human drug therapies targeting CARM1, as there are currently no CARM1 inhibitors available for use in clinical trials.

Impact of short-term, pharmacological CARM1 inhibition on skeletal muscle mass, function, and atrophy in mice

Coactivator-associated arginine methyltransferase 1 (CARM1) catalyzes the methylation of arginine residues on target proteins critical for health and disease. The purpose of this study was to characterize the effects of short-term, pharmacological CARM1 inhibition on skeletal muscle size, function, and atrophy. Adult mice (n = 10 or 11/sex) were treated with either a CARM1 inhibitor (150 mg/kg EZM2302; EZM) or vehicle (Veh) via oral gavage for 11-13 days and muscle mass, function, and exercise capacity were assessed. In addition, we investigated the effect of CARM1 suppression on unilateral hindlimb denervation (DEN)-induced muscle atrophy (n = 8/sex). We report that CARM1 inhibition caused significant reductions in the asymmetric dimethylation of known CARM1 substrates but no change in CARM1 protein or mRNA content in skeletal muscle. Reduced CARM1 activity did not affect body or muscle mass, however, we observed a decrease in exercise capacity and muscular endurance in male mice. CARM1 methyltransferase activity increased in the muscle of Veh-treated mice following 7 days of DEN, and this response was blunted in EZM-dosed mice. Skeletal muscle mass and myofiber cross-sectional area were significantly reduced in DEN compared with contralateral, non-DEN limbs to a similar degree in both treatment groups. Furthermore, skeletal muscle atrophy and autophagy gene expression programs were elevated in response to DEN independent of CARM1 suppression. Collectively, these results suggest that short-term, pharmacological CARM1 inhibition in adult animals affects muscle performance in a sex-specific manner but does not impact the maintenance and remodeling of skeletal muscle mass during conditions of neurogenic muscle atrophy.NEW & NOTEWORTHY Short-term pharmacological inhibition of coactivator-associated arginine methyltransferase 1 (CARM1) was effective at significantly reducing CARM1 methyltransferase function in skeletal muscle. CARM1 inhibition did not impact muscle mass, but exercise capacity was impaired, particularly in male mice, whereas morphological and molecular signatures of denervation-induced muscle atrophy were largely maintained in animals administered the inhibitor. Altogether, the role of CARM1 in neuromuscular biology remains complex and requires further investigation of its therapeutic potential in muscle-wasting conditions.

The Role of CREBBP/EP300 and Its Therapeutic Implications in Hematological Malignancies

Disordered histone acetylation has emerged as a key mechanism in promoting hematological malignancies. CREB-binding protein (CREBBP) and E1A-binding protein P300 (EP300) are two key acetyltransferases and transcriptional cofactors that regulate gene expression by regulating the acetylation levels of histone proteins and non-histone proteins. CREBBP/EP300 dysregulation and CREBBP/EP300-containing complexes are critical for the initiation, progression, and chemoresistance of hematological malignancies. CREBBP/EP300 also participate in tumor immune responses by regulating the differentiation and function of multiple immune cells. Currently, CREBBP/EP300 are attractive targets for drug development and are increasingly used as favorable tools in preclinical studies of hematological malignancies. In this review, we summarize the role of CREBBP/EP300 in normal hematopoiesis and highlight the pathogenic mechanisms of CREBBP/EP300 in hematological malignancies. Moreover, the research basis and potential future therapeutic implications of related inhibitors were also discussed from several aspects. This review represents an in-depth insight into the physiological and pathological significance of CREBBP/EP300 in hematology.

Combined Reverse-Transcriptase Multiplex Ligation-Dependent Probe Amplification and Next-Generation Sequencing Analyses to Assign Unclassified BCL2-/BCL6- Nonrearranged Small B-Cell Lymphoid Neoplasms as Follicular or Nodal Marginal Zone Lymphoma

Distinguishing between follicular lymphoma (FL) and nodal marginal zone lymphoma (NMZL) can be difficult when morphologic and phenotypic features are unusual and characteristic cytogenetic rearrangements are absent. We evaluated the diagnostic contribution of ancillary techniques-including fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH)-detected 1p36 deletion; reverse-transcriptase, multiplex, ligation-dependent probe amplification (RT-MLPA); and next-generation sequencing (NGS)-for tumors that remain unclassified according to standard criteria. After review, 50 CD5-negative small B-cell lymphoid neoplasms without BCL2 and BCL6 FISH rearrangements were diagnosed as FLs (n = 27), NMZLs (n = 5), or unclassified (n = 18) based on the 2016 World Health Organization Classification of Tumours of Haematopoietic and Lymphoid Tissues. FISH helped identify the 1p36 deletion in 3 FLs and 1 unclassified tumor. Most classified FLs had an RT-MLPA germinal center B-cell (GCB) signature (93%) or were noncontributive (7%). Classified NMZLs had an RT-MLPA activated B-cell signature (20%), had an unassigned signature (40%), or were noncontributive (40%). Among unclassified tumors, the RT-MLPA GCB signature was associated with mutations most commonly found in FLs (CREBBP, EZH2, STAT6, and/or TNFRSF14) (90%). An RT-MLPA-detected GCB signature and/or NGS-detected gene mutations were considered as FL identifiers for 13 tumors. An activated B-cell signature or NOTCH2 mutation supported NMZL diagnosis in 3 tumors. Combining the RT-MLPA and NGS findings successfully discriminated 89% of unclassified tumors in favor of one or the other diagnosis. NGS-detected mutations may be of therapeutic interest. Herein, we detected 3 EZH2 and 8 CREBBP mutations that might be eligible for targeted therapies.

The NFIB/CARM1 partnership is a driver in preclinical models of small cell lung cancer

The coactivator associated arginine methyltransferase (CARM1) promotes transcription, as its name implies. It does so by modifying histones and chromatin bound proteins. We identified nuclear factor I B (NFIB) as a CARM1 substrate and show that this transcription factor utilizes CARM1 as a coactivator. Biochemical studies reveal that tripartite motif 29 (TRIM29) is an effector molecule for methylated NFIB. Importantly, NFIB harbors both oncogenic and metastatic activities, and is often overexpressed in small cell lung cancer (SCLC). Here, we explore the possibility that CARM1 methylation of NFIB is important for its transforming activity. Using a SCLC mouse model, we show that both CARM1 and the CARM1 methylation site on NFIB are critical for the rapid onset of SCLC. Furthermore, CARM1 and methylated NFIB are responsible for maintaining similar open chromatin states in tumors. Together, these findings suggest that CARM1 might be a therapeutic target for SCLC.

Impact of Histone Modifications and Their Therapeutic Targeting in Hematological Malignancies

Hematologic malignancies are a large and heterogeneous group of neoplasms characterized by complex pathogenetic mechanisms. The abnormal regulation of epigenetic mechanisms and specifically, histone modifications, has been demonstrated to play a central role in hematological cancer pathogenesis and progression. A variety of epigenetic enzymes that affect the state of histones have been detected as deregulated, being either over- or underexpressed, which induces changes in chromatin compaction and, subsequently, affects gene expression. Recent advances in the field of epigenetics have revealed novel therapeutic targets, with many epigenetic drugs being investigated in clinical trials. The present review focuses on the biological impact of histone modifications in the pathogenesis of hematologic malignancies, describing a wide range of therapeutic agents that have been discovered to target these alterations and are currently under investigation in clinical trials.

Protein Arginine Methyltransferases as Therapeutic Targets in Hematological Malignancies

Arginine methylation is a common post-translational modification affecting protein activity and the transcription of target genes when methylation occurs on histone tails. There are nine protein arginine methyltransferases (PRMTs) in mammals, divided into subgroups depending on the methylation they form on a molecule of arginine. During the formation and maturation of the different types of blood cells, PRMTs play a central role by controlling cell differentiation at the transcriptional level. PRMT enzymatic activity is necessary for many cellular processes in hematological malignancies, such as the activation of cell cycle and proliferation, inhibition of apoptosis, DNA repair processes, RNA splicing, and transcription by methylating histone tails' arginine. Chemical tools have been developed to inhibit the activity of PRMTs and have been tested in several models of hematological malignancies, including primary samples from patients, xenografts into immunodeficient mice, mouse models, and human cell lines. They show a significant effect by reducing cell viability and increasing the overall survival of mice. PRMT5 inhibitors have a strong therapeutic potential, as phase I clinical trials in hematological malignancies that use these molecules show promising results, thus, underlining PRMT inhibitors as useful therapeutic tools for cancer treatment in the future.

LYL1 facilitates AETFC assembly and gene activation by recruiting CARM1 in t(8;21) AML

Transcription factors (TFs) play critical roles in hematopoiesis, and their aberrant expression can lead to various types of leukemia. The t(8;21) leukemogenic fusion protein AML1-ETO (AE) is the most common fusion protein in acute myeloid leukemia and can enhance hematopoietic stem cell renewal while blocking differentiation. A key question in understanding AE-mediated leukemia is what determines the choice of AE to activate self-renewal genes or repress differentiation genes. Toward the resolution of this problem, we earlier showed that AE resides in the stable AETFC complex and that its components colocalize on up- or down-regulated target genes and are essential for leukemogenesis. In the current study, using biochemical and genomic approaches, we show that AE-containing complexes are heterogeneous, and that assembly of the larger AETFC (containing AE, CBFβ, HEB, E2A, LYL1, LMO2, and LDB1) requires LYL1. Furthermore, we provide strong evidence that the LYL1-containing AETFC preferentially binds to active enhancers and promotes AE-dependent gene activation. Moreover, we show that coactivator CARM1 interacts with AETFC and facilitates gene activation by AETFC. Collectively, this study describes a role of oncoprotein LYL1 in AETFC assembly and gene activation by recruiting CARM1 to chromatin for AML cell survival.

Turning Nonselective Inhibitors of Type I Protein Arginine Methyltransferases into Potent and Selective Inhibitors of Protein Arginine Methyltransferase 4 through a Deconstruction-Reconstruction and Fragment-Growing Approach

Protein arginine methyltransferases (PRMTs) are important therapeutic targets, playing a crucial role in the regulation of many cellular processes and being linked to many diseases. Yet, there is still much to be understood regarding their functions and the biological pathways in which they are involved, as well as on the structural requirements that could drive the development of selective modulators of PRMT activity. Here we report a deconstruction–reconstruction approach that, starting from a series of type I PRMT inhibitors previously identified by us, allowed for the identification of potent and selective inhibitors of PRMT4, which regardless of the low cell permeability show an evident reduction of arginine methylation levels in MCF7 cells and a marked reduction of proliferation. We also report crystal structures with various PRMTs supporting the observed specificity and selectivity.

CARM1 promotes gastric cancer progression by regulating TFE3 mediated autophagy enhancement through the cytoplasmic AMPK-mTOR and nuclear AMPK-CARM1-TFE3 signaling pathways

BACKGROUND

The role of CARM1 in tumors is inconsistent. It acts as an oncogene in most cancers but it inhibits the progression of liver and pancreatic cancers. CARM1 has recently been reported to regulate autophagy, but this function is also context-dependent. However, the effect of CARM1 on gastric cancer (GC) has not been studied. We aimed to explore whether CARM1 was involved in the progression of GC by regulating autophagy.

METHODS

The clinical values of CARM1 and autophagy in GC were evaluated by immunohistochemistry and qRT-PCR. Transmission electron microscopy, immunofluorescence and western blotting were employed to identify autophagy. The role of CARM1 in GC was investigated by CCK-8, colony formation and flow cytometry assays in vitro and a xenograft model in vivo. Immunoprecipitation assays were performed to determine the interaction of CARM1 and TFE3.

RESULTS

CARM1 was upregulated in clinical GC tissues and cell lines, and higher CARM1 expression predicted worse prognosis. CARM1 enhanced GC cell proliferation, facilitated G1-S transition and inhibited ER stress-induced apoptosis by regulating autophagy. Importantly, treatment with a CARM1 inhibitor rescued the tumor-promoting effects of CARM1 both in vitro and in vivo. Furthermore, we demonstrated that CARM1 promoted TFE3 nuclear translocation to induce autophagy through the cytoplasmic AMPK-mTOR and nuclear AMPK-CARM1-TFE3 signaling pathways.

CONCLUSION

CARM1 promoted GC cell proliferation, accelerated G1-S transition and reduced ER stress-induced apoptosis by regulating autophagy. Mechanistically, CARM1 triggered autophagy by facilitating TFE3 nuclear translocation through the AMPK-mTOR and AMPK-CARM1-TFE3 signaling pathways.

Systematic pan-cancer landscape identifies CARM1 as a potential prognostic and immunological biomarker

BACKGROUND

Belonging to the protein arginine methyltransferase (PRMT) family, the enzyme encoded by coactivator associated arginine methyltransferase 1 (CARM1) catalyzes the methylation of protein arginine residues, especially acts on histones and other chromatin related proteins, which is essential in regulating gene expression. Beyond its well-established involvement in the regulation of transcription, recent studies have revealed a novel role of CARM1 in tumorigenesis and development, but there is still a lack of systematic understanding of CARM1 in human cancers. An integrated analysis of CARM1 in pan-cancer may contribute to further explore its prognostic value and potential immunological function in tumor therapy.

RESULTS

Based on systematic analysis of data in multiple databases, we firstly verified that CARM1 is highly expressed in most tumors compared with corresponding normal tissues, and is bound up with poor prognosis in some tumors. Subsequently, relevance between CARM1 expression level and tumor immune microenvironment is analyzed from the perspectives of tumor mutation burden, microsatellite instability, mismatch repair genes, methyltransferases genes, immune checkpoint genes and immune cells infiltration, indicating a potential relationship between CARM1 expression and tumor microenvironment. A gene enrichment analysis followed shortly, which implied that the role of CARM1 in tumor pathogenesis may be related to transcriptional imbalance and viral carcinogenesis.

CONCLUSIONS

Our first comprehensive bioinformatics analysis provides a broad molecular perspective on the role of CARM1 in various tumors, highlights its value in clinical prognosis and potential association with tumor immune microenvironment, which may furnish an immune based antitumor strategy to provide a reference for more accurate and personalized immunotherapy in the future.

Histone Modifications and Their Targeting in Lymphoid Malignancies

In a wide range of lymphoid neoplasms, the process of malignant transformation is associated with somatic mutations in B cells that affect the epigenetic machinery. Consequential alterations in histone modifications contribute to disease-specific changes in the transcriptional program. Affected genes commonly play important roles in cell cycle regulation, apoptosis-inducing signal transduction, and DNA damage response, thus facilitating the emergence of malignant traits that impair immune surveillance and favor the emergence of different B-cell lymphoma subtypes. In the last two decades, the field has made a major effort to develop therapies that target these epigenetic alterations. In this review, we discuss which epigenetic alterations occur in B-cell non-Hodgkin lymphoma. Furthermore, we aim to present in a close to comprehensive manner the current state-of-the-art in the preclinical and clinical development of epigenetic drugs. We focus on therapeutic strategies interfering with histone methylation and acetylation as these are most advanced in being deployed from the bench-to-bedside and have the greatest potential to improve the prognosis of lymphoma patients.

The Oncogenic Role and Immune Infiltration for CARM1 Identified by Pancancer Analysis

Chromatin-modifying enzymes, especially protein arginine methyltransferases (PRMTs), have been identified as candidate targets for cancer. Cellular or animal-based evidence has suggested an association between coactivator-linked arginine methyltransferase 1 (CARM1) and cancer progression. However, the relationship between CARM1 and patient prognosis and immune infiltration in pancancer patients is unknown. On the basis of the GEO and TCGA databases, we first investigated the possible oncogenic functions of CARM1 in thirty-three tumor types. CARM1 expression was elevated in many types of tumors. In addition, there was a significant association between CARM1 expression and the survival rate of tumor patients. Uterine corpus endometrial carcinoma (UCES) samples had the highest CARM1 mutation frequency of all cancer types. In head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSC) and lung squamous cell carcinoma (LUSC), CARM1 expression was associated with the level of CD8+ T cell infiltration, and cancer-associated fibroblast infiltration was also observed in other tumors including kidney renal papillary cell carcinoma (KIRC) and prostate adenocarcinoma (PRAD). CARM1 was involved in immune modulation and played an important role in the tumor microenvironment (TME). Furthermore, activities associated with RNA transport and its metabolism were included in the possible mechanisms of CARM1. Herein, our first pancancer research explores the oncogenic role of CARM1 in various tumors. CARM1 is associated with immune infiltrates and can be employed as a predictive biomarker in pancancer.

CREBBP cooperates with the cell cycle machinery to attenuate chidamide sensitivity in relapsed/refractory diffuse large B-cell lymphoma

Diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) exhibits frequent inactivating mutations of the histone acetyltransferase CREBBP, highlighting the attractiveness of targeting CREBBP deficiency as a therapeutic strategy. In this study, we demonstrate that chidamide, a novel histone deacetylase (HDAC) inhibitor, is effective in treating a subgroup of relapsed/refractory DLBCL patients, achieving an overall response rate (ORR) of 25.0% and a complete response (CR) rate of 15.0%. However, the clinical response to chidamide remains poor, as most patients exhibit resistance, hampering the clinical utility of the drug. Functional in vitro and in vivo studies have shown that CREBBP loss of function is correlated with chidamide sensitivity, which is associated with modulation of the cell cycle machinery. A combinatorial drug screening of 130 kinase inhibitors targeting cell cycle regulators identified AURKA inhibitors, which inhibit the G2/M transition during the cell cycle, as top candidates that synergistically enhanced the antitumor effects of chidamide in CREBBP-proficient DLBCL cells. Our study demonstrates that CREBBP inactivation can serve as a potential biomarker to predict chidamide sensitivity, while combination of an AURKA inhibitor and chidamide is a novel therapeutic strategy for the treatment of relapsed/refractory DLBCL.

WDR5 promotes the tumorigenesis of oral squamous cell carcinoma via CARM1/β-catenin axis

Oral squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC) is a malignancy all over the world. WD repeat domain 5 (WDR5) is involved in cancer progression. In addition, it was reported that WDR5 is upregulated in head and neck cancer, while its role in OSCC is unknown. First, the expression of WDR5 in oral cancer tissues and cells was examined by qRT-PCR, IHF and western blot. CCK-8 assay was performed to test the cell viability. Cell migration was assessed by transwell assay. Knocking down WDR5 or CARM1 in oral cancer cells to detect its function on cancer growth, WDR5 and CARM1 were significantly upregulated in OSCC. Silencing WDR5 suppressed OSCC cell viability and migration. CARM1 level in OSCC cells was significantly inhibited by WDR5 downregulation, and CARM1 elevation could rescue the effect of WDR5 knockdown on tumorigenesis of OSCC. Moreover, silencing of WDR5 notably inactivated β-catenin signaling pathway, while this phenomenon was restored by CARM1 overexpression. Silencing of WDR5 attenuated the tumorigenesis of OSCC via CARM1/β-catenin axis. Thus, WDR5 might be a target for OSCC treatment.

Gene Signature Associated With Bromodomain Genes Predicts the Prognosis of Kidney Renal Clear Cell Carcinoma

Bromodomain (BRD) proteins exhibit a variety of activities, such as histone modification, transcription factor recruitment, chromatin remodeling, and mediator or enhancer complex assembly, that affect transcription initiation and elongation. These proteins also participate in epigenetic regulation. Although specific epigenetic regulation plays an important role in the occurrence and development of cancer, the characteristics of the BRD family in renal clear cell carcinoma (KIRC) have not been determined. In this study, we investigated the expression of BRD family genes in KIRC at the transcriptome level and examined the relationship of the expression of these genes with patient overall survival. mRNA levels of tumor tissues and adjacent tissues were extracted from The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) database. Seven BRD genes (KAT2A, KAT2B, SP140, BRD9, BRPF3, SMARCA2, and EP300) were searched by using LASSO Cox regression and the model with prognostic risk integration. The patients were divided into two groups: high risk and low risk. The combined analysis of these seven BRD genes showed a significant association with the high-risk groups and lower overall survival (OS). This analysis demonstrated that total survival could be predicted well in the low-risk group according to the time-dependent receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve. The prognosis was determined to be consistent with that obtained using an independent dataset from TCGA. The relevant biological functions were identified using Gene Set Enrichment Analysis (GSEA). In summary, this study provides an optimized survival prediction model and promising data resources for further research investigating the role of the expression of BRD genes in KIRC.

Protein arginine methyltransferases: promising targets for cancer therapy

Protein methylation, a post-translational modification (PTM), is observed in a wide variety of cell types from prokaryotes to eukaryotes. With recent and rapid advancements in epigenetic research, the importance of protein methylation has been highlighted. The methylation of histone proteins that contributes to the epigenetic histone code is not only dynamic but is also finely controlled by histone methyltransferases and demethylases, which are essential for the transcriptional regulation of genes. In addition, many nonhistone proteins are methylated, and these modifications govern a variety of cellular functions, including RNA processing, translation, signal transduction, DNA damage response, and the cell cycle. Recently, the importance of protein arginine methylation, especially in cell cycle regulation and DNA repair processes, has been noted. Since the dysregulation of protein arginine methylation is closely associated with cancer development, protein arginine methyltransferases (PRMTs) have garnered significant interest as novel targets for anticancer drug development. Indeed, several PRMT inhibitors are in phase 1/2 clinical trials. In this review, we discuss the biological functions of PRMTs in cancer and the current development status of PRMT inhibitors in cancer therapy.

CARM1/PRMT4: Making Its Mark beyond Its Function as a Transcriptional Coactivator

Coactivator-associated arginine methyltransferase 1 (CARM1), identified 20 years ago as a coregulator of transcription, is an enzyme that catalyzes arginine methylation of proteins. Beyond its well-established involvement in the regulation of transcription, the physiological functions of CARM1 are still poorly understood. However, recent studies have revealed novel roles of CARM1 in autophagy, metabolism, paraspeckles, and early development. In addition, CARM1 is emerging as an attractive therapeutic target and a drug response biomarker for certain types of cancer. Here, we provide a comprehensive overview of the structure of CARM1 and its post-translational modifications, its various functions, apart from transcriptional coactivation, and its involvement in cancer.