Efficacy and safety of isatuximab plus bortezomib, lenalidomide, and dexamethasone in patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma ineligible/with no immediate intent for autologous stem cell transplantation

Multiple Myeloma: Improved Outcomes Resulting from a Rapidly Expanding Number of Therapeutic Options

Multiple myeloma (MM) is a bone-marrow-based cancer of plasma cells. Over the last 2 decades, marked treatment advances have led to improvements in the overall survival (OS) of patients with this disease. Key developments include the use of chemotherapy, immunomodulatory drugs, proteasome inhibitors, and monoclonal antibodies. MM remains incurable, with outcomes influenced by many factors, including age, sex, genetics, and treatment response. This review summarizes recent studies regarding monitoring and treatment of MM, emphasizing the efficacy of new therapies, the impact of maintenance treatments, and approaches for managing relapsed or refractory MM. The role of specific drug classes used to treat MM, including immunomodulatory drugs, proteasome inhibitors, monoclonal antibodies, and newer treatments such as chimeric antigen receptor T-cell therapies and bispecific antibodies are discussed. Combination therapies have significantly improved outcomes. Maintenance therapies, particularly with lenalidomide, have been effective in extending OS but lead to an increased risk of secondary cancers. Venetoclax, selinexor, and ruxolitinib have shown potential as new therapeutic options for patients with relapsed or refractory MM. Immune-based treatments, such as chimeric antigen receptor T-cell therapy and bispecific antibodies, mark a major advancement for heavily pretreated patients, although challenges remain related to cost, availability, and side effects. The treatment landscape for patients with MM has seen significant progress, with current therapies providing a longer OS and better quality of life. Future research should focus on optimizing these strategies, personalizing therapies, and exploring new therapeutic targets.

The impact of multiple myeloma drugs treatments on autologous stem cell transplantation in the era of new drugs

Autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) is the standard treatment recommended by the National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) for newly diagnosed multiple myeloma (MM) patients who are eligible for transplantation. This procedure follows response achieved through induction therapy. The key to the success of ASCT lies in the quantity and quality of hematopoietic stem cells collected after mobilization. Studies have shown a positive correlation between the number of hematopoietic stem cells collected and the engraftment time of absolute neutrophil count (ANC) and platelet count (PLT). However, the advent of novel therapeutic agents that have significantly improved the survival of MM patients has also impacted hematopoietic stem cell mobilization, potentially delaying hematopoietic recovery, a process referred to as hematopoietic remodeling. In this paper, we will retrospectively analyze and summarise the research progress related to the effects of previous chemotherapeutic agents on hematopoietic stem cell mobilization and hematopoietic remodeling, to further improve the prognosis and quality of survival of MM patients who are eligible for transplantation.

MRD-driven phase 2 study of daratumumab, carfilzomib, lenalidomide, and dexamethasone in newly diagnosed multiple myeloma

ABSTRACT

In newly diagnosed multiple myeloma (NDMM), measurable residual disease (MRD) status is prognostically important, but its role in treatment decisions remains unclear. In a phase 2 trial, we assessed daratumumab, carfilzomib, lenalidomide, and dexamethasone (Dara-KRd) induction followed by a next-generation sequencing-based MRD-adapted strategy. The primary outcome was complete response (CR) and stringent CR (≥CR) after induction. Flow cytometry was used to profile T cells. Among 39 patients, 21 (54%) achieved ≥CR after induction (P = .375), with MRD-negative rates of 59% (10-5) and 41% (10-6). Patients who were MRD-negative (n = 24, group A) received lenalidomide maintenance, showing sustained MRD negativity in 14 of 18 (77.8%) for ≥12 cycles. MRD-positive transplant-eligible patients (n = 8, group B) underwent autologous stem cell transplantation, with 62.5% converting to MRD-negative at 10-5 (37.5% at 10-6) posttransplant. MRD-positive, transplant-ineligible patients (n = 4, group C) received KRd consolidation. Best MRD-negative rates improved to 77% (10-5) and 72% (10-6). No new safety concerns were identified for Dara-KRd. With a median follow-up of 30.1 months, 3, 2, and 1 patient(s) in groups A, B, and C, respectively, have progressed or died. We observed that Dara-KRd strongly activated memory T cells, which was associated with an MRD-negative state post induction. Although the primary outcome was not met, Dara-KRd induction in NDMM achieved high ≥CR and MRD-negative rates without new safety concerns. The post induction MRD-adapted strategy deepened responses in MRD-positive patients and maintained durable MRD control in MRD-negative patients. This trial was registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov as #NCT04113018.

Efficacy and safety of anti-CD38 monoclonal antibodies-based therapy versus standard therapy in newly diagnosed multiple myeloma patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Background

Anti-CD38 monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) have significantly changed the multiple myeloma treatment landscape. This meta-analysis compared the efficacy and safety of anti-CD38 mAb-based therapy versus standard therapy in newly diagnosed multiple myeloma (NDMM) patients.

Methods

We performed a comprehensive literature search on PubMed, the Cochrane Database, and ClinicalTrials.gov. The primary outcomes were progression-free survival (PFS) and minimal residual disease (MRD) status. Dichotomous outcomes were pooled using risk ratio (RR) along with the 95% confidence interval (CI) in RevMan 5.4. Subgroup analysis and meta-regression analysis were performed. The RoB 2.0 tool was used to assess the risk of bias.

Results

Our meta-analysis included 11 randomized controlled trials. There were 5270 patients; 3040 TEs and 2230 TIEs. Anti-CD38 mAbs significantly improved MRD negativity (RR 1.94, 95% CI: 1.59-2.37; p < 0.00001) and PFS (RR 0.51, 95% CI: 0.45-0.58; p < 0.00001). Subgroup analyses revealed better outcomes for both the TE (MRD: RR 1.52, 95% CI: 1.37-1.68; PFS: RR 0.43, 95% CI: 0.34-0.54) and TIE (MRD: RR 3.49, 95% CI: 2.65-4.61; PFS: RR 0.55, 95% CI: 0.47-0.64) populations. Meta-regression revealed that Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) score 0 significantly influenced MRD status (β = -0.015, p < 0.05), whereas ECOG scores 1 and 2 lacked statistical significance. Subgroup analysis revealed that PFS was significantly different between standard (RR 0.47) and high (RR 0.81) cytogenetic risk groups.

Conclusion

In NDMM patients, anti-CD38 mAb-based therapy significantly improved MRD status, and PFS compared with standard therapy alone, in both TE and TIE patients, suggesting a favorable benefit-risk profile.

Optimizing individualized therapy decision-making in multiple myeloma (MM): integration and impact of the Revised Myeloma Comorbidity Index in the MM-tumor board

Multiple Myeloma (MM) is a hematological disease predominantly affecting elderly patients. The complexity of current treatment necessitates individualized approaches. Therein, functional assessment (FA) tools, such as the Revised Comorbidity Index (R-MCI) at our University- and Comprehensive Cancer Center Freiburg, play a crucial role. This study aimed to determine (a) the implementation of the R-MCI in our MM-tumor board (MM-TB), (b) its impact on treatment guidance at baseline and (c) potential changes during follow-up. This exploratory study investigated R-MCI coverage and distribution in a cohort of patients with multiple TB presentations. Among them, a follow-up patient cohort undergoing subsequent MM-therapy was analyzed to determine treatment adjustments and changes in patients' condition measured by R-MCI alterations. During our 3-year assessment period, 565 patients were presented in our MM-TB, totaling 1256 TB-presentations. In the multiple TB presentation cohort, the median number of TB presentations was 3 (range: 2-12). R-MCI scores within the MM-TB were available in 94%, whereas in 6%, the R-MCI had not been integrated. Among these, potential failure to identify the need for treatment modifications was determined. In the follow-up cohort, patient characteristics were typical for referral/university centers. Dose reductions were performed in 55% and were more prevalent among patients with ≥ 4 vs. lesser TB presentations. Most patients (55%) showed a fitness stabilization or improvement via follow-up R-MCI. R-MCI integration in MM-TB exceeded > 90%, indicating its successful integration for treatment support. Our results underscore its value in guiding therapy decisions, providing a comprehensive assessment beyond age considerations.

Characteristics and outcomes of therapy-related acute leukemia following autologous transplant (Auto-HCT) for multiple myeloma

With a prolonging duration of survivorship, patients with multiple myeloma (MM) who receive high-dose chemotherapy and autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (auto-HCT) have an increased risk of secondary malignancy, most concerning acute leukemia. We retrospectively reviewed the records of all patients with MM who underwent auto-HCT between January 1, 2010, and January 1, 2023, who later developed therapy-related acute leukemia (t-AL). Of 1770 patients with MM who underwent auto-HCT, 18 (1.01%) developed t-AL at a mean interval of 60.0 ± 41.3 months after auto-HCT. The patients with t-AL consisted of 9 (50%) with B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia (B-ALL), 8 (44.4%) with acute myeloid leukemia (AML), and 1 (5.6%) with acute promyelocytic leukemia (APML). All patients had received an alkylating agent as part of induction, and the majority received lenalidomide as maintenance therapy. Genetic abnormalities of t-AL were consistent with prior reports. Median overall survival from diagnosis of t-AL was 19.5 months. In patients with t-AL who entered CR, long term survival was common. Further research on predisposing conditions to developing t-AL in patients with MM undergoing auto-HCT is warranted.

Isatuximab, Bortezomib, Lenalidomide, and Dexamethasone for Multiple Myeloma

BACKGROUND

Bortezomib, lenalidomide, and dexamethasone (VRd) is a preferred first-line treatment option for patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma. Whether the addition of the anti-CD38 monoclonal antibody isatuximab to the VRd regimen would reduce the risk of disease progression or death among patients ineligible to undergo transplantation is unclear.

METHODS

In an international, open-label, phase 3 trial, we randomly assigned, in a 3:2 ratio, patients 18 to 80 years of age with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma who were ineligible to undergo transplantation to receive either isatuximab plus VRd or VRd alone. The primary efficacy end point was progression-free survival. Key secondary end points included a complete response or better and minimal residual disease (MRD)-negative status in patients with a complete response.

RESULTS

A total of 446 patients underwent randomization. At a median follow-up of 59.7 months, the estimated progression-free survival at 60 months was 63.2% in the isatuximab-VRd group, as compared with 45.2% in the VRd group (hazard ratio for disease progression or death, 0.60; 98.5% confidence interval, 0.41 to 0.88; P<0.001). The percentage of patients with a complete response or better was significantly higher in the isatuximab-VRd group than in the VRd group (74.7% vs. 64.1%, P = 0.01), as was the percentage of patients with MRD-negative status and a complete response (55.5% vs. 40.9%, P = 0.003). No new safety signals were observed with the isatuximab-VRd regimen. The incidence of serious adverse events during treatment and the incidence of adverse events leading to discontinuation were similar in the two groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Isatuximab-VRd was more effective than VRd as initial therapy in patients 18 to 80 years of age with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma who were ineligible to undergo transplantation. (Funded by Sanofi and a Cancer Center Support Grant; IMROZ ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT03319667.).

Isatuximab for Stem Cell Transplant-Ineligible Multiple Myeloma: An Editorial

The recent approval of isatuximab in combination with bortezomib, lenalidomide, and dexamethasone (Isa-VRd) marks a significant advancement in the treatment of stem cell transplant-ineligible multiple myeloma (MM) patients. MM, the second most common hematological malignancy globally, poses substantial challenges, especially for patients who are unable to undergo autologous stem cell transplantation due to advanced age or comorbidities. Isatuximab, a CD38-targeting monoclonal antibody, has demonstrated promising efficacy in the pivotal trial, which reported a 40% reduction in disease progression or death for patients treated with Isa-VRd compared to bortezomib-lenalidomide-dexamethasone alone. The trial also showed higher rates of complete response and minimal residual disease (MRD)-negative status in the Isa-VRd group without introducing new safety concerns. These findings suggest that isatuximab's integration into first-line therapy could substantially improve long-term outcomes for this underserved patient population. Clinicians are encouraged to adopt regular MRD monitoring and provide comprehensive patient education on potential side effects to optimize treatment adherence. Further research on isatuximab's use in combination with other emerging therapies may continue to expand therapeutic possibilities, offering hope for more effective management of MM.

Recent Developments in Convenience of Administration of the Anti-CD38 Antibody Isatuximab: Subcutaneous Delivery and Fast Intravenous Infusion in Patients With Multiple Myeloma

Isatuximab-based combinations are among the accepted standard-of-care regimens for early-line treatment of patients with relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM), based on the results of the Phase 3 ICARIA-MM and IKEMA trials. Further study findings have shown benefit with Isa-based combinations in patients with newly diagnosed MM, as reported from the randomized GMMG-HD7 and CONCEPT trials. Isa is currently approved in various countries for intravenous (IV) administration in patients with RRMM. A more convenient route of administration, such as subcutaneous (SC) injection, and faster IV infusion may substantially increase convenience of treatment. In this review, we outline evidence emerging from clinical trials that shows increasing clinical applicability of Isa across the MM therapeutic spectrum. We then review recent study results demonstrating that new treatment modalities, either SC Isa administration via an on-body delivery system (OBDS) or fast, 30-minute, fixed-volume IV infusion, are safe and effective, and enhance convenience of treatment with Isa for MM patients and healthcare providers. In the recently reported Phase 1b study, the safety profile and efficacy of Isa administered SC plus pomalidomide-dexamethasone were comparable to those observed with Isa administered IV plus pomalidomide-dexamethasone in the control arm and in the ICARIA-MM trial. Analysis of patient-reported outcomes indicated patient confidence in SC Isa administration and satisfaction with treatment delivery by OBDS. These findings point to SC administration as the preferred route for future treatment with Isa-based combinations, as well as to the use of fast, 30-minute IV infusions in settings where SC administration of Isa might not be available.

Characteristics of isatuximab-derived interference in serum protein electrophoresis and immunofixation, and an absence of sustained in vivo interference due to belantamab mafodotin and denosumab

OBJECTIVES

Some therapeutic monoclonal antibodies, like daratumumab and elotuzumab, produce interfering monoclonal bands on serum protein electrophoresis (SPEP) and immunofixation electrophoresis (IFE). Whether other common therapeutic antibodies also produce interference has not been systematically evaluated.

DESIGN AND METHODS

SPEP/IFE from patients receiving isatuximab (48 patients), belantamab mafodotin (BM; 41), and denosumab (41) were retrospectively reviewed for therapeutic antibody interference. Cases exhibiting isatuximab interference were quantified and the maximum duration of isatuximab effect was evaluated. To characterize band position, neat human serum was spiked with BM or denosumab at supratherapeutic concentrations. Band migration patterns were compared on SPEP and IFE, with band position expressed relative to other constant protein fractions.

RESULTS

Isatuximab-induced IFE interference was common (81.3 % of evaluated patients) with a maximum observed duration of 8 weeks. 10.4 % of isatuximab patients had IgG kappa monoclonal gammopathies that co-migrated with the drug; this subset could benefit from HYDRASHIFT 2/4 isatuximab testing. 8.3 % of IFE cases were negative for an isatuximab band but showed large, endogenous M-spikes migrating elsewhere. All patients in this group expired within 1 year of this finding. We hypothesize that an inability to detect isatuximab in this setting corresponds to a large residual myeloma burden that reduces isatuximab serum concentration. This observation may serve as a negative prognostic factor. Spiking studies demonstrated that BM and denosumab produce interference in vitro, but sustained interference was not observed in >40 treated patients.

CONCLUSIONS

Therapeutic antibody interference in patients receiving isatuximab is common, and can persist for at least 8 weeks after administration. >10 % of patients receiving isatuximab may benefit from HYDRASHIFT testing post-therapy. In contrast, BM and denosumab fail to produce sustained interference in treated patients.

A sensitive high-resolution mass spectrometry method for quantifying intact M-protein light chains in patients with multiple myeloma

To determine the disease status and the response to treatment for patients with multiple myeloma, measuring serum M-protein levels is a widely used alternative to invasive punctures to count malignant plasma cells in the bone marrow. However, the quantification of this monoclonal antibody, which varies from patient to patient, poses significant analytical challenges. This paper describes a sensitive and specific mass spectrometry assay that addresses two objectives: to overcome the potential interference of biotherapeutics in the measurement of M-proteins, and to determine the depth of response to treatment by assessing minimal residual disease. After immunocapture of immunoglobulins and free light chains in serum, heavy and light chains were dissociated by chemical reduction and separated by liquid chromatography. M-proteins were analyzed by high-resolution mass spectrometry using a method combining a full MS scan for isotyping and identification and a targeted single ion monitoring scan for quantification. This method was able to discriminate M-protein from the therapeutic antibody in all patient samples analyzed and allowed quantification of M-protein with a LLOQ of 2.0 to 3.5 µg/ml in 5 out of 6 patients. This methodology appears to be promising for assessing minimal residual disease with sufficient sensitivity, specificity, and throughput.

Role of daratumumab in the frontline management of multiple myeloma: a narrative review

INTRODUCTION

The prevalence of multiple myeloma (MM) has gradually increased over the last few decades in India due to growing population, better disease awareness, and improved diagnostic procedures. Despite such advances, MM remains an incurable and relapsing disease due to its heterogeneity and genomic instability. With the inclusion of monoclonal antibodies, especially daratumumab in the frontline regimen, the management landscape of MM has improved significantly resulting in better disease control and patient outcomes.

AREAS COVERED

This review aims to provide an in-depth summary of efficacy and safety of frontline daratumumab therapy in treatment of MM including patients with high-risk cytogenetic profile.

EXPERT OPINION

Based on the review of literature, daratumumab in frontline therapy has demonstrated improved efficacy in terms of reduction in disease progression or death, and superior minimal residual disease (MRD)-negativity rates with an acceptable safety profile in patients with newly diagnosed MM (NDMM) including patients with high-risk cytogenetic profile. Daratumumab alone or in combination with other drugs has shown similar clinical outcomes in patients with relapsed/refractory MM. Hence, daratumumab can be used upfront in patients with MM.