BRAF V600E mutation is a potential therapeutic target for a small subset of synovial sarcoma

An overview of RAF kinases and their inhibitors (2019-2023)

Protein kinases (PKs) including RAF, perform a principal role in regulating countless cellular events such as cell growth, differentiation, and angiogenesis. Overexpression and mutation of RAF kinases are significant contributors to the development and spread of cancer. Therefore, RAF kinase inhibitors show promising outcomes as anti-cancer small molecules by suppressing the expression of RAF protein, blocking RAS/RAF interaction, or inhibiting RAF enzymes. Currently, there are insufficient reports about approving drugs with minimal degree of toxicity. Therefore, it is an urgent need to develop new RAF kinase inhibitors correlated with increased anticancer activity and lower cytotoxicity. This review outlines reported RAF kinase inhibitors for cancer treatment in patents and literature from 2019 to 2023. It highlights the available inhibitors by shedding light on their chemical structures, biochemical profiles, and current status. Additionally, we highlighted the hinge region-binding moiety of the reported compounds by showing the hydrogen bond patterns of representative inhibitors with the hinge region for each class. In recent years, RAF kinase inhibitors have gained considerable attention in cancer research and drug development due to their potential to be studied under clinical trials and their demonstration of various degrees of efficacy and safety profiles across different cancer types. However, addressing challenges related to drug resistance and safety represents a major avenue for the optimization and enhancement of RAF kinase inhibitors. Strategies to overcome such obstacles were discussed such as developing novel pan-RAF inhibitors, RAF dimer inhibitors, and combination treatments.

Rapid but nondurable response of a BRAF exon 15 double-mutated spindle cell sarcoma to a combination of BRAF and MEK inhibitors

INTRODUCTION

BRAF V600E substitution predicts sensitivity of a cancer to BRAF inhibitor therapy. The mutation is rarely found in soft-tissue sarcomas. Here we describe a case of undifferentiated spindle cell sarcoma showing primary insensitivity to standard chemotherapy and pronounced but non-sustained response to BRAF/MEK inhibitors at recurrence.

CASE PRESENTATION

A 13-year-old girl was diagnosed with low-grade spindle cell sarcoma of pelvic localization, BRAF exon 15 double-mutated: c.1799T>A p.V600E and c.1819T>A p.S607T in cis-position. The tumor showed resistance to CWS-based first-line chemotherapy and was treated surgically by radical resection. Seven months after surgery the patient developed metastatic relapse with abdominal carcinomatosis. Combined targeted therapy with BRAF/MEK inhibitors afforded complete response in 1 month and was continued, though complicated by severe side effects (fever, rash) necessitating 1-2 week toxicity breaks. After 4 months from commencement the disease recurred and anti-BRAF/MEK regimen consolidation was unsuccessful. Intensive salvation chemotherapy was ineffective. Empirical immunotherapy afforded a transient partial response giving way to fatal progression with massive, abdominal cocoon-complicated peritoneal carcinomatosis.

CONCLUSION

This is the first report of spindle cell sarcoma BRAF V600E/S607T double-mutated, responding to a combination of B-Raf and MEK inhibitors. Despite the low histological grade and radical surgical treatment of the tumor at primary manifestation, the disease had aggressive clinical course and the response to BRAF/MEK targeted therapy at recurrence was complete but nondurable. Empirical use of pembrolizumab provided no unambiguous evidence on the clinical relevance of immunotherapy in protein kinase -rearranged spindle cell tumors.

The Combined Immunohistochemical Expression of GLI1 and BCOR in Synovial Sarcomas for the Identification of Three Risk Groups and Their Prognostic Outcomes: A Study of 52 Patients

Synovial sarcoma (SS) is a rare soft-tissue tumor characterized by a monomorphic blue spindle cell histology and variable epithelial differentiation. Morphologically, SSs may be confused with other sarcomas. Systemic treatment is more effective for patients with high-risk SSs, patients with advanced disease, and younger patients. However, further studies are required to find new prognostic biomarkers. Herein, we describe the morphological, molecular, and clinical findings, using a wide immunohistochemical panel, of a series of SS cases. We studied 52 cases confirmed as SSs by morphological diagnosis and/or molecular studies. Clinical data (gender, age, tumor size, tumor location, resection margins, adjuvant treatment, recurrences, metastasis, and survival) were also retrieved for each patient. All the available H&E slides were examined by four pathologists. Three tissue microarrays (TMAs) were constructed for each of the tumors, and a wide immunohistochemical panel was performed. For time-to-event variables, survival analysis was performed using Kaplan-Meier curves and log-rank testing, or Cox regression. Statistical significance was considered at p < 0.05. The mean age of our patients was 40.33, and the median was 40.5 years. We found a predominance of males versus females (1.7:1). The most frequent morphological subtype was monophasic. TRPS1, SS18-SSX, and SSX-C-terminus were positive in 96% of cases. GLI1 expression was strong in six and focal (cytoplasmic) in twenty patients. Moreover, BCOR was expressed in more than half of SSs. Positive expression of both proteins, BCOR and GLI1, was correlated with a worse prognosis. Multivariate analysis was also performed, but only BCOR expression appeared to be significant. The combination of GLI1 and BCOR antibodies can be used to group SSs into three risk groups (low, intermediate, and high risk). We hypothesize that these findings could identify which patients would benefit from receiving adjuvant treatment and which would not. Moreover, these markers could represent therapeutic targets in advanced stages. However, further, larger series of SSs and molecular studies are necessary to corroborate our present findings.

Metabolic Lipids in Melanoma Enable Rapid Determination of Actionable BRAF-V600E Mutation with Picosecond Infrared Laser Mass Spectrometry in 10 s

Rapid molecular profiling of biological tissues with picosecond infrared laser mass spectrometry (PIRL-MS) has enabled the detection of clinically important histologic types and molecular subtypes of human cancers in as little as 10 s of data collection and analysis time. Utilizing an engineered cell line model of actionable BRAF-V600E mutation, we observed statistically significant differences in 10 s PIRL-MS molecular profiles between BRAF-V600E and BRAF-wt cells. Multivariate statistical analyses revealed a list of mass-to-charge (m/z) values most significantly responsible for the identification of BRAF-V600E mutation status in this engineered cell line that provided a highly controlled testbed for this observation. These metabolites predicted BRAF-V600E expression in human melanoma cell lines with greater than 98% accuracy. Through chromatography and tandem mass spectrometry analysis of cell line extracts, a 30-member "metabolite array" was characterized for determination of BRAF-V600E expression levels in subcutaneous melanoma xenografts with an average sensitivity and specificity of 95.6% with 10 s PIRL-MS analysis. This proof-of-principle work warrants a future large-scale study to identify a metabolite array for 10 s determination of actionable BRAF-V600E mutation in human tissue to guide patient care.

Undifferentiated and Dedifferentiated Metastatic Melanomas Masquerading as Soft Tissue Sarcomas: Mutational Signature Analysis and Immunotherapy Response

The distinction between undifferentiated melanoma (UM) or dedifferentiated melanoma (DM) from undifferentiated or unclassifiable sarcoma can be difficult and requires the careful correlation of clinical, pathologic, and genomic findings. In this study, we examined the utility of mutational signatures to identify patients with UM/DM with particular attention as to whether this distinction matters for treatment because the survival of patients with metastatic melanoma has dramatically improved with immunologic therapy, whereas durable responses are less frequent in sarcomas. We identified 19 cases of UM/DM that were initially reported as unclassified or undifferentiated malignant neoplasm or sarcoma and submitted for targeted next-generation sequencing analysis. These cases were confirmed as UM/DM by harboring melanoma driver mutations, UV signature, and high tumor mutation burden. One case of DM showed melanoma in situ. Meanwhile, 18 cases represented metastatic UM/DM. Eleven patients had a prior history of melanoma. Thirteen of 19 (68%) of the tumors were immunohistochemically completely negative for 4 melanocytic markers (S100, SOX10, HMB45, and MELAN-A). All cases harbored a dominant UV signature. Frequent driver mutations involved BRAF (26%), NRAS (32%), and NF1 (42%). In contrast, the control cohort of undifferentiated pleomorphic sarcomas (UPS) of deep soft tissue exhibited a dominant aging signature in 46.6% (7/15) without evidence of UV signature. The median tumor mutation burden for DM/UM vs UPS was 31.5 vs 7.0 mutations/Mb (P < .001). A favorable response to immune checkpoint inhibitor therapy was observed in 66.6% (12/18) of patients with UM/DM. Eight patients exhibited a complete response and were alive with no evidence of disease at the last follow-up (median 45.5 months). Our findings support the usefulness of the UV signature in discriminating DM/UM vs UPS. Furthermore, we present evidence suggesting that patients with DM/UM and UV signatures can benefit from immune checkpoint inhibitor therapy.

Clinical Utility of Circulating Tumor DNA in Advanced Rare Cancers

Purpose

Patients with advanced/relapsed rare cancers have few treatment options. Analysis of circulating tumor DNA in plasma may identify actionable genomic biomarkers using a non-invasive approach.

Patients and Methods

Rare cancer patients underwent prospective plasma-based NGS testing. Tissue NGS to test concordance was also conducted. Plasma DNA alterations were assessed for incidence, functional impact, therapeutic implications, correlation to survival, and comparison with tissue NGS.

Results

Ninety-eight patients were analyzed. Diseases included soft-tissue sarcoma, ovarian carcinoma, and others. Mean turn-around-time for results was 9.5 days. Seventy-six patients had detectable gene alterations in plasma, with a median of 2.8 alterations/patient. Sixty patients had a likely pathogenic alteration. Five received matched-therapy based on plasma NGS results. Two developed known resistance mutations while on targeted therapy. Patients with an alteration having VAF ≥5% had a significantly shorter survival compared to those of lower VAF. Tissue NGS results from eleven of 22 patients showed complete or partial concordance with plasma NGS.

Conclusion

Plasma NGS testing is less invasive and capable of identifying alterations in advanced rare cancers in a clinically meaningful timeframe. It should be further studied as a prospective enrollment assay in interventional studies for patients with rare advanced stage cancers.

Clinical Registration

[https://www.umin.ac.jp/ctr/index-j.htm], identifier UMIN000034394.

Upregulation of ERK-EGR1-heparanase axis by HDAC inhibitors provides targets for rational therapeutic intervention in synovial sarcoma

BACKGROUND

Synovial sarcoma (SS) is an aggressive soft tissue tumor with limited therapeutic options in advanced stage. SS18-SSX fusion oncogenes, which are the hallmarks of SS, cause epigenetic rewiring involving histone deacetylases (HDACs). Promising preclinical studies supporting HDAC targeting for SS treatment were not reflected in clinical trials with HDAC inhibitor (HDACi) monotherapies. We investigated pathways implicated in SS cell response to HDACi to identify vulnerabilities exploitable in combination treatments and improve the therapeutic efficacy of HDACi-based regimens.

METHODS

Antiproliferative and proapoptotic effects of the HDACi SAHA and FK228 were examined in SS cell lines in parallel with biochemical and molecular analyses to bring out cytoprotective pathways. Treatments combining HDACi with drugs targeting HDACi-activated prosurvival pathways were tested in functional assays in vitro and in a SS orthotopic xenograft model. Molecular mechanisms underlying synergisms were investigated in SS cells through pharmacological and gene silencing approaches and validated by qRT-PCR and Western blotting.

RESULTS

SS cell response to HDACi was consistently characterized by activation of a cytoprotective and auto-sustaining axis involving ERKs, EGR1, and the β-endoglycosidase heparanase, a well recognized pleiotropic player in tumorigenesis and disease progression. HDAC inhibition was shown to upregulate heparanase by inducing expression of the positive regulator EGR1 and by hampering negative regulation by p53 through its acetylation. Interception of HDACi-induced ERK-EGR1-heparanase pathway by cell co-treatment with a MEK inhibitor (trametinib) or a heparanase inhibitor (SST0001/roneparstat) enhanced antiproliferative and pro-apoptotic effects. HDAC and heparanase inhibitors had opposite effects on histone acetylation and nuclear heparanase levels. The combination of SAHA with SST0001 prevented the upregulation of ERK-EGR1-heparanase induced by the HDACi and promoted caspase-dependent cell death. In vivo, the combined treatment with SAHA and SST0001 potentiated the antitumor efficacy against the CME-1 orthotopic SS model as compared to single agent administration.

CONCLUSIONS

The present study provides preclinical rationale and mechanistic insights into drug combinatory strategies based on the use of ERK pathway and heparanase inhibitors to improve the efficacy of HDACi-based antitumor therapies in SS. The involvement of classes of agents already clinically available, or under clinical evaluation, indicates the transferability potential of the proposed approaches.

Correlating SS18-SSX immunohistochemistry (IHC) with SS18 fluorescent in situ hybridization (FISH) in synovial sarcomas: a study of 36 cases

The recently introduced, highly sensitive and specific SS18-SSX immunohistochemistry (IHC) is an attractive alternative to SS18 fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) testing in synovial sarcoma (SS). However, little is known about how SS18-SSX IHC correlates with SS18 FISH. We correlated the SS18 FISH results of SS from 36 patients with SS18-SSX IHC. Twenty-six tumours had a classic break-apart FISH pattern (1 fused, 1 red and 1 green signal) and all stained positive for the IHC. Ten had an atypical (non-classic) FISH pattern of which 5 stained positive for the IHC. Four of these (including two with novel atypical SS18 FISH patterns) were confirmed to harbour the SS18-SSX fusion on targeted RNA sequencing, while one had classic features of a biphasic SS. The remaining 5 tumours stained negative for the IHC. One had a TPM3-NTRK1 fusion, and one had no fusion, while the remaining three had insufficient tissue/RNA for sequencing. The sensitivity of the IHC was 91% (after excluding the 2 cases with confirmed absence of SS18-SSX fusion). Twenty histologic mimics of SS also stained negative for the IHC (100% specificity). Our study shows that the SS18-SSX IHC is more specific than SS18 FISH in diagnosing SS, especially in cases with atypical FISH patterns. It correlates well with RNA sequencing result and has the potential to replace SS18 FISH testing. A positive IHC result supports the diagnosis of SS, while a tumour with atypical FISH pattern and negative IHC result should undergo further molecular testing.

Translating Molecular Profiling of Soft Tissue Sarcomas into Daily Clinical Practice

Soft tissue sarcomas are a group of rare mesenchymal tumors with more than 70 subtypes described. Treatment of these subtypes in an advanced setting is mainly according to a one-size-fits-all strategy indicating a high unmet need of new and more targeted therapeutic options in order to optimize survival. The introduction of advanced molecular techniques in cancer has led to better diagnostics and identification of new therapeutic targets, leading to more personalized treatment and improved prognosis for several cancer types. In sarcoma, a likewise evolution is seen, albeit at a slower pace. This manuscript describes how in the past years advanced molecular profiling in soft tissue sarcomas was able to identify specific and often pathognomonic aberrations, deferring standard sarcoma treatment in favor of more targeted treatment from an oncologist’s point of view.

Sarcoma treatment in the era of molecular medicine

Sarcomas are heterogeneous and clinically challenging soft tissue and bone cancers. Although constituting only 1% of all human malignancies, sarcomas represent the second most common type of solid tumors in children and adolescents and comprise an important group of secondary malignancies. More than 100 histological subtypes have been characterized to date, and many more are being discovered due to molecular profiling. Owing to their mostly aggressive biological behavior, relative rarity, and occurrence at virtually every anatomical site, many sarcoma subtypes are in particular difficult-to-treat categories. Current multimodal treatment concepts combine surgery, polychemotherapy (with/without local hyperthermia), irradiation, immunotherapy, and/or targeted therapeutics. Recent scientific advancements have enabled a more precise molecular characterization of sarcoma subtypes and revealed novel therapeutic targets and prognostic/predictive biomarkers. This review aims at providing a comprehensive overview of the latest advances in the molecular biology of sarcomas and their effects on clinical oncology; it is meant for a broad readership ranging from novices to experts in the field of sarcoma.

A case report of metastatic giant sarcomatoid melanoma with BRAF V600E mutation: a complete response to targeted therapy

Sarcomatoid melanoma is an extremely rare pattern of malignant melanoma, and only few cases have been described throughout the literature. We herein report a case of a patient with newly diagnosed, metastatic giant sarcomatoid melanoma of the arm. The patient underwent surgical removal of the huge mass, and NGS sequencing demonstrated BRAF V600E mutation.

In view of histological, immunohistochemical and molecular findings, a combined BRAF/MEK inhibitor (BRAF/MEK-i) therapy was prescribed as first line treatment. A complete response (over one year) to targeted therapy was obtained, and no adverse events have been reported. The patient maintained a full range of shoulder and elbow movements, and she is able to live independently and resume her daily activities. We therefore recommend that all patients with undifferentiated melanomas, sarcomatoid cutaneous malignancies or other mesenchymal tumours, should undergo BRAFV600E mutation testing.