IDH-mutant gliomas with additional class-defining molecular events

Challenges and limitations of clinical trials in the adolescent and young adult CNS cancer population: A systematic review

Background

The adolescent and young adult (AYA) cancer population, aged 15-39, carries significant morbidity and mortality. Despite growing recognition of unique challenges with this age group, there has been little documentation of unmet needs in their care, trial participation, and quality of life, particularly in those with primary brain tumors.

Methods

A systematic literature review of 4 databases was conducted following Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) standards. Studies included editorials, reviews, and practice guidelines on the challenges and limitations faced by the AYA population. Papers had to address CNS tumors.

Results

Sixty-eight studies met the inclusion criteria. The challenges and limitations in clinical trials in the AYA population were synthesized into 11 categories: molecular heterogeneity, tumor biology, diagnostic delay, access to care, physician factors, patient factors, primary brain tumor (PBT) factors, accrual, limited trials, long term follow up, and trial design. The published papers' recommendations were categorized based on the target of the recommendation: providers, coordination of care, organizations, accrual, and trial design. The AYA cancer population was found to suffer from unique challenges and barriers to care and the construction of trials.

Conclusions

The AYA CNS cancer population suffers from unique challenges and barriers to care and construction of trials that make it critical to acknowledge AYAs as a distinct patient population. In addition, AYAs with primary brain tumors are underrecognized and underreported in current literature. More studies in the AYA primary brain tumor patient population are needed to improve their care and participation in trials.

Astrocytoma (CNS WHO grade 4), IDH-mutant with co-occurrence of BRAF p.V600E mutation, and homozygous loss of CDKN2A

Molecular alterations nowadays play a crucial role in the diagnosis of brain tumors. Some of these alterations are associated with outcome and/or response to treatment, including sequence variants of isocitrate dehydrogenase (IDH) at position p.R132 or p.R172. Such IDH variants have so far been described in histone H3-wildtype primary brain tumors only in adult-type diffuse gliomas and are associated with a better outcome compared to their IDH-wildtype counterpart, the glioblastoma. Moreover, homozygous loss of CDKN2A and/or CDKN2B in IDH-mutant astrocytomas shortens the median overall survival regardless of histological features of malignancy. Such tumors are therefore considered to be aggressive and graded as WHO central nervous system (CNS) grade 4 lesions. The coexistence of an IDH-sequence variation and a BRAF p.V600E alteration has only rarely been described in diffuse astrocytomas. Due to the small number of cases, little is known about such neoplasms in terms of clinical behavior and response to treatment. Herein we describe the first case, to our knowledge, of an astrocytoma (CNS WHO grade 4), IDH-mutant, and BRAF p.V600E-mutant with homozygous deletion of CDKN2A. Pathologists should be aware that such an expression profile does exist even in WHO CNS grade 4 astrocytomas, IDH-mutant, and are encouraged to test for the BRAF p.V600E sequence variant as such an alteration may provide additional treatment options.

Recent application of artificial intelligence on histopathologic image-based prediction of gene mutation in solid cancers

PURPOSE

Evaluation of genetic mutations in cancers is important because distinct mutational profiles help determine individualized drug therapy. However, molecular analyses are not routinely performed in all cancers because they are expensive, time-consuming and not universally available. Artificial intelligence (AI) has shown the potential to determine a wide range of genetic mutations on histologic image analysis. Here, we assessed the status of mutation prediction AI models on histologic images by a systematic review.

METHODS

A literature search using the MEDLINE, Embase and Cochrane databases was conducted in August 2021. The articles were shortlisted by titles and abstracts. After a full-text review, publication trends, study characteristic analysis and comparison of performance metrics were performed.

RESULTS

Twenty-four studies were found mostly from developed countries, and their number is increasing. The major targets were gastrointestinal, genitourinary, gynecological, lung and head and neck cancers. Most studies used the Cancer Genome Atlas, with a few using an in-house dataset. The area under the curve of some of the cancer driver gene mutations in particular organs was satisfactory, such as 0.92 of BRAF in thyroid cancers and 0.79 of EGFR in lung cancers, whereas the average of all gene mutations was 0.64, which is still suboptimal.

CONCLUSION

AI has the potential to predict gene mutations on histologic images with appropriate caution. Further validation with larger datasets is still required before AI models can be used in clinical practice to predict gene mutations.

Gemistocytic Differentiation in Isocitrate Dehydrogenase Mutant Astrocytomas: A Histopathological and Survival Analysis

Gemistocytic differentiation is a rare histological feature seen in IDH mutant Astrocytomas. The 2021 World Health Organization (WHO) retains the diagnosis of IDH mutant Astrocytoma with its classical histology and tumors with the rare histological pattern of gemistocytic differentiation. Gemistocytic differentiation has historically been associated with a worse prognosis and shorter survival, and this prognostic difference has not been investigated in detail in our population. A population-based retrospective study included 56 patients with IDH mutant Astrocytoma with Gemistocytic differentiation and IDH mutant Astrocytoma diagnosed between 2010 and 2018 in our hospital. Demographic, histopathological, and clinical parameters were compared between the two groups. Gemistocyte percentage, perivascular lymphoid infiltrates, and Ki-67 proliferation index were also analyzed. A Kaplan-Meier analysis was done to analyze any prognostic difference in the overall survival time between the two groups. Patients with an IDH mutant Astrocytoma having gemistocytic differentiation had an average survival period of 2 years, while patients diagnosed with an IDH mutant Astrocytoma had an average survival time of approximately 6 years. There was a statistically significant decrease in survival time (p = 0.005) for patients with tumors with gemistocytic differentiation. The percentage of gemistocytes and the presence of perivascular lymphoid aggregates did not correlate with survival time (p = 0.303 and 0.602, respectively). Tumors with gemistocytic morphology had a higher mean Ki-67 proliferation index (4.4%) than IDH mutant Astrocytoma (2.0%, p = 0.005). Our data suggest that IDH mutant Astrocytoma with Gemistocytic differentiation is an aggressive variant of IDH mutant Astrocytoma associated with a shorter survival time and an overall worse prognosis. This data might be helpful to clinicians in the future management of IDH mutant Astrocytoma with Gesmistocytic differentiation as an aggressive tumor.

Infiltrating gliomas with FGFR alterations: Histologic features, genetic alterations, and potential clinical implications

BACKGROUND

Fibroblast growth factor receptors (FGFRs) are frequently altered in cancers and present a potential therapeutic avenue. However, the type and prevalence of FGFR alterations in infiltrating gliomas (IGs) needs further investigation.

OBJECTIVE

To understand the prevalence/type of FGFR alterations in IGs.

METHODS

We reviewed clinicopathologic and genomic alterations of FGFR-mutant gliomas in a cohort of 387 patients. Tumors were examined by DNA next-generation sequencing for somatic mutations with a panel interrogating 205-genes. For comparison, cBioPortal databases were queried to identify FGFR-altered IGs.

RESULTS

Fourteen patients (3.6%) with FGFR-mutant tumors were identified including 11 glioblastomas, Isocitrate dehydrogenase (IDH) - wildtype (GBM-IDH-WT), 2 oligodendrogliomas, and 1 astrocytoma IDH-mutant. FGFR-altered IGs showed endocrinoid capillaries, microvascular proliferation, necrosis, oligodendroglioma-like cells, fibrin thrombi, microcalcifications, and nodular growth. FGFR3 was the most commonly altered FGFR gene (64.3%). The most common additional mutations in FGFR-altered IGs were TERTp, CDKN2A/B, PTEN, CDK4, MDM2, and TP53. FGFR3 alterations were only observed in GBM-IDH-WT. EGFR alterations were rarely identified in FGFR3-altered gliomas.

CONCLUSIONS

Histologic features correlate with FGFR alterations in IGs. FGFR3-TACC3 fusion and FGFR3 amplification are the most common FGFR alterations in IGs. FGFR alterations are a rare, but potentially viable, therapeutic target in asubset of IGs.

WHO 2021 and beyond: new types, molecular markers and tools for brain tumor classification

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

The fifth edition of the WHO classification of central nervous system tumors was published in 2021. It implemented major advances in the current diagnostic practice such as DNA methylation profiling. The review addresses how our understanding of the diversity of brain tumors has recently much improved through omics analysis and derived molecular biomarkers.

RECENT FINDINGS

Latest impactful studies identifying new diagnostic or prognostic biomarkers in frequent tumors and describing new rare tumor types are summarized about adult and pediatric gliomas, rare neuroepithelial tumors, ependymomas, medulloblastomas and meningiomas. Some controversies are debated. The role of methylation classes and surrogate immunohistochemical markers is highlighted.

SUMMARY

New diagnostic criteria and better definitions of tumor types aim at improving the management of brain tumor patients and at better evaluating new treatments in clinical trials. The rapidly evolving field of brain tumor classification opens exciting perspectives and many challenges to integrate clinical, radiological, histological and molecular information into a framework relevant for care and research.

Early Postoperative Treatment versus Initial Observation in CNS WHO Grade 2 and 3 Oligodendroglioma: Clinical Outcomes and DNA Methylation Patterns

PURPOSE

The treatment of oligodendroglioma consists of tumor resection and radiochemotherapy. The timing of radiochemotherapy remains unclear, and predictive biomarkers are limited.

EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN

Adult patients diagnosed with isocitrate dehydrogenase (IDH)-mutated, 1p/19q-codeleted CNS WHO grade 2 and 3 oligodendroglioma at the Medical University of Vienna and the Kepler University Hospital Linz (Austria) in 1992 to 2019 were included. Progression-free (PFS) and overall survival (OS) between early postoperative treatment and initial observation were compared using propensity score-weighted Cox regression models. DNA methylation analysis of tumor tissue was performed using Illumina MethylationEPIC 850k microarrays.

RESULTS

One hundred thirty-one out of 201 (65.2%) patients with CNS WHO grade 2 and 70 of 201 (34.8%) with grade 3 oligodendroglioma were identified. Eighty-three of 201 (41.3%) patients underwent early postoperative treatment, of whom 56 of 83 (67.5%) received radiochemotherapy, 15 of 84 (18.1%) radiotherapy (RT) only and 12 of 83 (14.5%) chemotherapy only. Temozolomide-based treatment was administered to 64 of 68 (94.1%) patients, whereas RT + procarbazine, lomustine (CCNU), and vincristine (PCV) were applied in 2 of 69 (3.5%) patients. Early treatment was not associated with PFS [adjusted hazard ratio (HR) 0.74; 95% CI, 0.33-1.65, P = 0.459] or OS (adjusted HR: 2.07; 95% CI, 0.52-8.21, P = 0.302) improvement. Unsupervised clustering analysis of DNA methylation profiles from patients receiving early treatment revealed two methylation clusters correlating with PFS, whereas no association of clustering with O6-methylguanine methyltransferase (MGMT) promoter methylation, CNS WHO grade, extent of resection, and treating center could be observed.

CONCLUSIONS

In this retrospective study, early postoperative treatment was not associated with improved PFS/OS in oligodendroglioma. The potentially predictive value of whole-genome methylation profiling should be validated in prospective trials.

Molecular testing for adolescent and young adult central nervous system tumors: A Canadian guideline

The 2021 World Health Organization (WHO) classification of CNS tumors incorporates molecular signatures with histology and has highlighted differences across pediatric vs adult-type CNS tumors. However, adolescent and young adults (AYA; aged 15–39), can suffer from tumors across this spectrum and is a recognized orphan population that requires multidisciplinary, specialized care, and often through a transition phase. To advocate for a uniform testing strategy in AYAs, pediatric and adult specialists from neuro-oncology, radiation oncology, neuropathology, and neurosurgery helped develop this review and testing framework through the Canadian AYA Neuro-Oncology Consortium. We propose a comprehensive approach to molecular testing in this unique population, based on the recent tumor classification and within the clinical framework of the provincial health care systems in Canada.

Systematic Review of Epigenetic Therapies for Treatment of IDH-mutant Glioma

BACKGROUND

Isocitrate dehydrogenase (IDH) mutations are present in 70% of World Health Organization grade II and III gliomas. IDH mutation induces accumulation of the oncometabolite 2-hydroxyglutarate. Therefore, therapies targeting reversal of epigenetic dysregulation in gliomas have been suggested. However, the utility of epigenetic treatments in gliomas remains unclear. Here, we present the first clinical systematic review of epigenetic therapies in treatment of IDH-mutant gliomas and highlight their safety and efficacy.

METHODS

We conducted a systematic search of electronic databases from 2000 to January 2021 following PRISMA guidelines. Articles were screened to include clinical usage of epigenetic therapies in case reports, prospective case series, or clinical trials. Primary and secondary outcomes included safety/tolerability of epigenetic therapies and progression-free survival/overall survival, respectively.

RESULTS

A total of 133 patients across 8 clinical studies were included in our analysis. IDH inhibitors appear to have the best safety profile, with an overall grade 3/grade 4 adverse event rate of 9%. Response rates to IDH-mutant inhibitors were highest in nonenhancing gliomas (stable disease achieved in 55% of patients). In contrast, histone deacetylase inhibitors demonstrate a lower safety profile with single-study adverse events as high as 28%.

CONCLUSION

IDH inhibitors appear promising given their benign toxicity profile and ease of monitoring. Histone deacetylase inhibitors appear to have a narrow therapeutic index, as lower concentrations do not appear effective, while increased doses can produce severe immunosuppressive effects. Preliminary data suggest that epigenetic therapies are generally well tolerated and may control disease in certain patient groups, such as those with nonenhancing lesions.

Frequent FGFR1 hotspot alterations in driver-unknown low-grade glioma and mixed neuronal-glial tumors

Purpose

Low-grade gliomas (LGG) and mixed neuronal-glial tumors (MNGT) show frequent MAPK pathway alterations. Oncogenic fibroblast growth factor receptor 1 (FGFR1) tyrosinase kinase domain has been reported in brain tumors of various histologies. We sought to determine the frequency of FGFR1 hotspot mutations N546 and K656 in driver-unknown LGG/MNGT and examined FGFR1 immunohistochemistry as a potential tool to detect those alterations.

Methods

We analyzed 476 LGG/MNGT tumors for KIAA-1549-BRAF fusion, IDH1/2, TERT promotor, NF1, H3F3A and the remaining cases for FGFR1 mutation frequency and correlated FGFR1 immunohistochemistry in 106 cases.

Results

368 of 476 LGG/MNGT tumors contained non-FGFR1 alterations. We identified 9 FGFR1 p.N546K and 4 FGFR1 p.K656E mutations among the 108 remaining driver-unknown samples. Five tumors were classified as dysembryoplastic neuroepithelial tumor (DNT), 4 as pilocytic astrocytoma (PA) and 3 as rosette-forming glioneuronal tumor (RGNT). FGFR1 mutations were associated with oligodendroglia-like cells, but not with age or tumor location. FGFR1 immunohistochemical expression was observed in 92 cases. FGFR1 immunoreactivity score was higher in PA and DNT compared to diffuse astrocytoma, but no correlation between FGFR1 mutation in tumors and FGFR1 expression level was observed.

Conclusion

FGFR1 hotspot mutations are the fifth most prevailing alteration in LGG/MNGT. Performing FGFR1 sequencing analysis in driver-unknown low-grade brain tumors could yield up to 12% FGFR1 N546/K656 mutant cases.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s00432-021-03906-x.

Immunohistochemical surrogates for molecular alterations for the classification and grading of gliomas

Recent advances in molecular diagnostics have led to a better understanding of glioma tumorigenesis, prognosis, and treatment. Therefore, the 2016 WHO Classification of Tumours of the Central Nervous System and more recent literature recommends the incorporation of molecular results in the pathology report. The methods for molecular testing vary among institutions; however, most practicing pathologists utilize a range of immunohistochemical surrogates for molecular alterations in the evaluation of gliomas. This manuscript reviews the clinical aspects and pitfalls of the immunohistochemical stains with diagnostic, prognostic and therapeutic implications in gliomas.