Loss of expression of YAP1 C-terminus as an ancillary marker for epithelioid hemangioendothelioma variant with YAP1-TFE3 fusion and other YAP1-related vascular neoplasms

Soft Tissue Fine-Needle Aspiration: Current and Future Impact on Patient Care

Soft tissue neoplasms pose many diagnostic challenges on fine-needle aspiration (FNA), owing largely to their rarity, large number of entities, and histologic diversity. Advances in ancillary testing now allow detection of the characteristic immunophenotypes and molecular alterations for many neoplasms and include reliable surrogate immunohistochemical markers for underlying molecular events that are highly efficient in small biopsies. A morphology-based framework is recommended to guide appropriate differentials and judicious selection of ancillary tests for small biopsies. The accurate diagnosis of soft tissue tumors is crucial for patient management and prognostication, with many potential implications in this era of precision medicine.

Immunohistochemical detection of cancer genetic abnormalities

New applications of immunohistochemistry (IHC) expand rapidly due to the development of molecular analyses and an increased understanding of molecular biology. IHC becomes much more important as a screening or even a confirmatory test for molecular changes in cancer. The past decades have witnessed the release of many immunohistochemical markers of the new generation. The novel markers have extensively high specificity and sensitivity for the detection of genetic abnormalities. In addition to diagnostic utility, IHC has been validated to be a practical tool in terms of treatments, especially molecular targeted therapy. In this review, we first describe the common alterations of protein IHC staining in human cancer: overexpression, underexpression, or loss of expression and altered staining pattern. Next, we examine the relationship between staining patterns and genetic aberrations regarding both conventional and novel IHC markers. We also mention current mutant-specific and fusion-specific antibodies and their concordance with molecular techniques. We then describe the basic molecular mechanisms from genetic events to corresponding protein expression patterns (membranous, cytoplasmic, or nuclear patterns). Finally, we shortly discuss the applications of immunohistochemistry in molecular targeted therapy. IHC markers can serve as a complementary or companion diagnostic test to provide valuable information for targeted therapy. Moreover, immunohistochemistry is also crucial as a companion diagnostic test in immunotherapy. The increased number of IHC novel antibodies is broadening its application in anti-cancer therapies.

Mesenchymal tumours of the pleura: review and update

Primary mesenchymal tumours of the pleura are uncommon and can be diagnostically challenging due to their overlapping histopathologic and immunophenotypic features. Herein we discuss selected mesenchymal tumours of the pleura, including solitary fibrous tumour, calcifying fibrous tumour, desmoid fibromatosis, synovial sarcoma, schwannoma, malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumour, inflammatory myofibroblastic tumour, follicular dendritic cell sarcoma, epithelioid hemangioendothelioma, and desmoplastic small round cell tumour. We review their clinicopathologic characteristics, along with an update on the relevant immunohistochemical and molecular features.

Loss of YAP1 C-terminus expression as an ancillary marker for metaplastic thymoma: a potential pitfall in detecting YAP1::MAML2 gene rearrangement

AIMS

Metaplastic thymoma is a rare thymic tumour characterized by Yes Associated Protein 1 (YAP1) and Mastermind Like Transcriptional Coactivator 2 (MAML2) gene fusions resulting from an intrachromosomal inversion of chromosome 11. Immunohistochemistry with an antibody directed against the C-terminus of YAP1 has shown loss of expression in YAP1-rearranged vascular neoplasms, poromas, and porocarcinomas. This study aimed to validate an anti-YAP1 C-terminal antibody as an ancillary immunohistochemical marker for the diagnosis of metaplastic thymoma.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Ten metaplastic thymomas were selected for the current study. Fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH), next-generation sequencing (NGS), and reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) analyses were performed to detect YAP1::MAML2 fusions. We then performed immunohistochemistry to detect YAP1 C-terminus expression in 10 metaplastic thymomas, 50 conventional thymomas (10 each of type A thymoma, type AB thymoma, type B1 thymoma, type B2 thymoma, and type B3 thymoma) and seven thymic carcinomas.

RESULTS

All 10 cases showed narrow split signals with a distance of nearly two signal diameters and sometimes had false-negative results in YAP1 and MAML2 break-apart FISH (BA-FISH). Abnormal colocalized signals of the YAP1::MAML2 fusion were observed in all 10 cases using fusion FISH (F-FISH) assays. Eight of 10 cases with adequate nucleic acids were successfully sequenced and all showed YAP1::MAML2 fusions; in two cases the fusions were detected by both DNA and RNA sequencing and in six cases by RNA sequencing only. YAP1::MAML2 fusion transcripts were identified in four cases by RT-PCR. Metaplastic thymoma showed loss of YAP1 C-terminus expression in all 10 (100%) cases. All other thymic neoplasms showed retained YAP1 C-terminus expression.

CONCLUSION

YAP1 C-terminus immunohistochemistry is a highly sensitive and specific ancillary marker that distinguishes metaplastic thymoma from its mimics. BA-FISH assays could not effectively detect YAP1::MAML2 fusions due to the proximity of the two genes. Loss of YAP1 C-terminus expression is a reliable surrogate for the detection of YAP1::MAML2 fusions in metaplastic thymoma.

Primary hepatic epithelioid hemangioendothelioma masquerading as metastases: A rare case report

Epithelioid hemangioendothelioma (EHE) of the liver is an extremely rare malignant tumor of vascular origin, representing less than 1 % of all vascular tumors. Nearly 260 cases have been reported in English literature. Radiologically it is seen as multifocal lesions. It can be seen at different sites like lungs, bones, lymph nodes, breasts, and soft tissue. Often it is misdiagnosed with metastases, cholangiocarcinoma, or angiosarcoma. No definite treatment protocol is available due to its rarity, however, these malignancies are treated by radical resection of the tumor or liver transplant and/or chemotherapy. Here we present a primary hepatic epithelioid hemangioendothelioma (HEHE) which was mimicking metastases in a 42-year-old male who was treated with chemotherapy and radiotherapy. Sadly the patient expired after 1 year of complete course of treatment. Imaging features can help to improve the diagnostic accuracy of this tumor.

A Matched Molecular and Clinical Analysis of the Epithelioid Haemangioendothelioma Cohort in the Stafford Fox Rare Cancer Program and Contextual Literature Review

BACKGROUND

Epithelioid haemangioendothelioma (EHE) is an ultra-rare malignant vascular tumour with a prevalence of 1 per 1,000,000. It is typically molecularly characterised by a WWTR1::CAMTA1 gene fusion in approximately 90% of cases, or a YAP1::TFE3 gene fusion in approximately 10% of cases. EHE cases are typically refractory to therapies, and no anticancer agents are reimbursed for EHE in Australia.

METHODS

We report a cohort of nine EHE cases with comprehensive histologic and molecular profiling from the Walter and Eliza Hall Institute of Medical Research Stafford Fox Rare Cancer Program (WEHI-SFRCP) collated via nation-wide referral to the Australian Rare Cancer (ARC) Portal. The diagnoses of EHE were confirmed by histopathological and immunohistochemical (IHC) examination. Molecular profiling was performed using the TruSight Oncology 500 assay, the TruSight RNA fusion panel, whole genome sequencing (WGS), or whole exome sequencing (WES).

RESULTS

Molecular analysis of RNA, DNA or both was possible in seven of nine cases. The WWTR1::CAMTA1 fusion was identified in five cases. The YAP1::TFE3 fusion was identified in one case, demonstrating unique morphology compared to cases with the more common WWTR1::CAMTA1 fusion. All tumours expressed typical endothelial markers CD31, ERG, and CD34 and were negative for pan-cytokeratin. Cases with a WWTR1::CAMTA1 fusion displayed high expression of CAMTA1 and the single case with a YAP1::TFE3 fusion displayed high expression of TFE3. Survival was highly variable and unrelated to molecular profile.

CONCLUSIONS

This cohort of EHE cases provides molecular and histopathological characterisation and matching clinical information that emphasises the molecular patterns and variable clinical outcomes and adds to our knowledge of this ultra-rare cancer. Such information from multiple studies will advance our understanding, potentially improving treatment options.

Small Molecule Inhibitors as Therapeutic Agents Targeting Oncogenic Fusion Proteins: Current Status and Clinical

Oncogenic fusion proteins, arising from chromosomal rearrangements, have emerged as prominent drivers of tumorigenesis and crucial therapeutic targets in cancer research. In recent years, the potential of small molecular inhibitors in selectively targeting fusion proteins has exhibited significant prospects, offering a novel approach to combat malignancies harboring these aberrant molecular entities. This review provides a comprehensive overview of the current state of small molecular inhibitors as therapeutic agents for oncogenic fusion proteins. We discuss the rationale for targeting fusion proteins, elucidate the mechanism of action of inhibitors, assess the challenges associated with their utilization, and provide a summary of the clinical progress achieved thus far. The objective is to provide the medicinal community with current and pertinent information and to expedite the drug discovery programs in this area.

Benign and low-grade superficial endothelial cell neoplasms in the molecular era

Vascular tumors are the most common mesenchymal neoplasms of the skin and subcutis, and they encompass a heterogeneous group with diverse clinical, histological, and molecular features, as well as biological behavior. Over the past two decades, molecular studies have enabled the identification of pathogenic recurrent genetic alterations that can be used as additional data points to support the correct classification of these lesions. The purpose of this review is to summarize the available data related to superficially located benign and low-grade vascular neoplasms and to highlight recent molecular advances with the role of surrogate immunohistochemistry to target pathogenic proteins as diagnostic biomarkers.

Malignant undifferentiated epithelioid neoplasms with MAML2 rearrangements: A clinicopathologic study of seven cases demonstrating a heterogenous entity

Among mesenchymal tumors, MAML2 gene rearrangements have been described in a subset of composite hemangioendothelioma and myxoinflammatory fibroblastic sarcoma (MIFS). However, we have recently encountered MAML2-related fusions in a group of seven undifferentiated malignant epithelioid neoplasms that do not fit well to any established pathologic entities. The patients included five males and two female, aged 41-71 years old (median 65 years). The tumors involved the deep soft tissue of extremities (hip, knee, arm, hand), abdominal wall, and the retroperitoneum. Microscopically, the tumors consisted of solid sheets of atypical epithelioid to histiocytoid cells with abundant cytoplasm. Prominent mitotic activity and necrosis were present in 4 cases. In 3 cases, the cells displayed hyperchromatic nuclei or conspicuous macronucleoli, and were admixed with background histiocytoid cells and a lymphoplasmacytic infiltrate. By immunohistochemistry (IHC), the neoplastic cells had a nonspecific phenotype. On targeted RNA sequencing, MAML2 was the 3' partner and fused to YAP1 (4 cases), ARHGAP42 (2 cases), and ENDOD1 (1 case). Two cases with YAP1::MAML2 harbored concurrent RAF kinase fusions (RBMS3::RAF1 and AGK::BRAF, respectively). In 2 cases with targeted DNA sequencing, mutations in TP53, RB1 and PTEN were detected in 1 case, and PDGFRB mutations, CCNE1 amplifications and CDKN2A/2B deletion were detected in another case, which showed strong and diffuse PDGFRB expression by IHC. Of the 4 cases with detailed clinical history (median follow-up period 8 months), three developed distant metastatic disease (one of which died of disease); one case remained free of disease 3 years following surgical excision. In conclusion, we describe a heterogeneous series of MAML2-rearranged undifferentiated malignant epithelioid neoplasms, a subset of which may overlap with a recently described MIFS variant with YAP1::MAML2 fusions, further expanding the clinicopathologic spectrum of mesenchymal neoplasms with recurrent MAML2 gene rearrangements.

Hepatic epithelioid hemangioendothelioma a case report and literature review

INTRODUCTION

Hepatic epithelioid hemangioendothelioma (HEHE) is a rare disease with a high probability of being misdiagnosed.

CASE PRESENTATION

We present a case of a 38-year-old female patient found with HEHE by physical examination. The tumor was removed by surgery successfully, but then had recurrence after the operation.

CLINICAL DISCUSSION

We review the current literature on HEHE; its prevalence, diagnosis and treatment. And our opinion is that using fluorescent laparoscopy for HEHE may has an advantage in visualizing tumors, but there is still high possibility of false positives. It is recommended to use it correctly during operation.

CONCLUSION

The clinical presentation, laboratory and imaging index for HEHE were lacking in specificity. Therefore, diagnosis still depends mainly on pathology results, in which the most effective treatment is surgery. Besides, the fluorescent nodule which is not shown on images need to be analyzed carefully in order to avoid damage to normal tissue.

Molecular testing of soft tissue tumors

BACKGROUND

The diagnosis of soft tissue tumors is challenging, especially when the evaluable material procured is limited. As a result, diagnostic ancillary testing is frequently needed. Moreover, there is a trend in soft tissue pathology toward increasing use of molecular results for tumor classification and prognostication. Hence, diagnosing newer tumor entities such as CIC-rearranged sarcoma explicitly requires molecular testing. Molecular testing can be accomplished by in situ hybridization, polymerase chain reaction, as well as next generation sequencing, and more recently such testing can even be accomplished leveraging an immunohistochemical proxy.

CONCLUSION

This review evaluates the role of different molecular tests in characterizing soft tissue tumors belonging to various cytomorphologic categories that have been sampled by small biopsy and cytologic techniques.

Epithelioid Vascular Lesions: The Differential Diagnosis and Approach in Cytology and Small Biopsies

Vascular neoplasms are rare tumors with a multitude of clinical presentations and behavior, which make accurate identification and subclassification challenging on limited small biopsies. Within the spectrum of these lesions, the ones with epithelioid morphology, such as epithelioid hemangioendothelioma and epithelioid angiosarcoma, are particularly challenging given the morphologic overlap with nonvascular lesions and the limited cells due to hemodilution on sampling. Herein, we review the differential diagnosis of epithelioid vascular neoplasms, with a focus on the cytomorphology, differential diagnoses, and ancillary studies that pathologists should be aware of when evaluating small biopsies and aspirates, including novel translocations, and associated monoclonal immunohistochemistry antibodies, that can help in the diagnosis of some of these tumors. Awareness of these morphologic and ancillary study findings in these rare tumors will hopefully allow pathologists to recognize and render-specific diagnoses on limited samples of these challenging lesions.

Update from the 5th Edition of the World Health Organization Classification of Head and Neck Tumors: Soft Tissue Tumors

The fifth (5th) edition of the World Health Organization (WHO) Classification of Head and Neck Tumors introduces a new chapter dedicated to soft tissue neoplasms commonly affecting the head and neck. While the diversity, rarity, and wide anatomic range of soft tissue tumors precludes a discussion of all entities that may be found in the head and neck, the addition of this new chapter to the head and neck "blue book" aims to provide a more comprehensive and uniform reference text, including updated diagnostic criteria, of mesenchymal tumor types frequently (or exclusively) arising at head and neck sites. Since publication of the previous edition in 2017, there have been numerous advances in our understanding of the pathogenesis of many soft tissue tumors which have facilitated refinements in tumor classification, identification of novel entities, development of diagnostic markers, and improved prognostication. This review will provide a focused discussion of the soft tissue tumors included in the 5th edition WHO Head and Neck classification, with an emphasis on updates.

Primary Intranodal Epithelioid Hemangioendothelioma with Molecular Confirmation

Epithelioid hemangioendothelioma (EHE) is a rare low-grade malignant vascular tumor with indolent biology, characterized by reciprocal t(1;3)(p36.6;q25) with resultant WWTR1::CAMTA1 gene fusion in the vast majority of cases, regardless of anatomic location. Only a small subset, exhibiting well formed vasoformative features will contain YAP1::TFE3 gene fusion. Primary intranodal EHE is exquisitely rare. We report a case in a 54-year-old male with persistent left groin mass with discomfort for nine months. A CT of the abdomen and pelvis showed a minimally enlarged left inguinal lymph node measuring 2.8 cm with no other masses or lymphadenopathy. PET/CT and MRI imaging of the abdomen showed no evidence of disease elsewhere. Sections showed an epithelioid vasoformative neoplasm, centrally necrotic and involving a lymph node. The cells were arranged in anastomosing cords with intracytoplasmic lumens, resembling "signet ring cells". By immunohistochemistry, the tumor cells were positive for vimentin, CD31, CD34, ERG and CAMTA1; and negative for AE1/3, CAM 5.2, KRT7, KRT20, desmin, actin, HMB-45 and S-100. Ki-67 proliferation index was estimated at <1%. Molecular studies including next generation sequencing (NGS) revealed the presence of WWTR1::CAMTA1 gene fusion, and fluorescence in situ hybridization for CAMTA1 (1p36.23) and WWTR1 (3p25.1) showed fusion signals, diagnostic of EHE. We highlight a rare occurrence of EHE in a lymph node exhibiting morphologic mimicry with metastatic carcinoma.

Diagnosis of soft tissue tumors using immunohistochemistry as a surrogate for recurrent fusion oncoproteins

Soft tissue neoplasms encompass a broad spectrum of clinicopathologic manifestations. In a subset of soft tissue tumors, spanning a wide range of clinical behavior from indolent to highly aggressive, recurrent genetic translocations yield oncogenic fusion proteins that drive neoplastic growth. Beyond functioning as primary mechanisms of tumorigenesis, recurrent translocations represent key diagnostic features insofar as the presence of a particular oncogenic gene fusion generally points to specific tumor entities. In addition to more direct methods for identifying recurrent translocations, such as conventional cytogenetics or fluorescence in situ hybridization, immunohistochemistry for a component of the fusion oncoprotein increasingly is being used as a surrogate marker, exploiting the tendency of these fusion components to be distinctively overexpressed by translocation-bearing tumor cells. Diagnostic immunohistochemistry can also be used to identify the characteristic gene expression changes that occur downstream of oncogenic fusions. Here, we review the use of immunohistochemistry to detect surrogate markers of recurrent translocations in soft tissue tumors, focusing on the practical applications and limitations of this diagnostic approach.

The genetics of vascular tumours: an update

Recent molecular advances have shed significant light on the classification of vascular tumours. Except for haemangiomas, vascular lesions remain difficult to diagnose, owing to their rarity and overlapping clinical, radiographic and histological features across malignancies. In particular, challenges still remain in the differential diagnosis of epithelioid vascular tumours, including epithelioid haemangioma and epithelioid haemangioendothelioma at the benign/low-grade end of the spectrum, and epithelioid angiosarcoma at the high-grade end. Historically, the classification of vascular tumours has been heavily dependent on the clinical setting and histological features, as traditional immunohistochemical markers across the group have often been non-discriminatory. The increased application of next-generation sequencing in clinical practice, in particular targeted RNA sequencing (such as Archer, Illumina), has led to numerous novel discoveries, mainly recurrent gene fusions (e.g. those involving FOS, FOSB, YAP1, and WWTR1), which have resulted in refined tumour classification and improved diagnostic reproducibility for vascular tumours. However, other molecular alterations besides fusions have been discovered in vascular tumours, including somatic mutations (e.g. involving GNA family and IDH genes) in a variety of haemangiomas, as well as copy number alterations in high-grade angiosarcomas (e.g. MYC amplifications). Moreover, the translation of these novel molecular abnormalities into diagnostic ancillary markers, either fluorescence in-situ hybridisation probes or surrogate immunohistochemical markers (FOSB, CAMTA1, YAP1, and MYC), has been remarkable. This review will focus on the latest molecular discoveries covering both benign and malignant vascular tumours, and will provide practical diagnostic algorithms, highlighting frequently encountered pitfalls and challenges in the diagnosis of vascular lesions.

A YAP1::TFE3 cutaneous low-grade fibromyxoid neoplasm: A novel entity!

Cutaneous fibromyxoid neoplasms (CFMN) comprise a vast category of benign and malignant tumors that include, but are not limited to, low-grade fibromyxoid sarcoma, myxofibrosarcoma, myxoid dermatofibrosarcoma protuberans, myxoid solitary fibrous tumor, and myxoid neurofibroma with differing implications for treatment and prognosis. Herein, a case of CFMN arising as a painless, slow-growing, flesh-colored forearm mass in a 53-year-old female is presented. The neoplasm comprised of copious myxoid material with banal spindle cells, exhibiting mild hyperchromasia, dissecting the dermal collagen table. Focal perivascular accentuation of spindle cells was identified in the absence of vasoformative features. Immunohistochemically, lesional cells were strongly and diffusely positive for CD34 and multifocally for Factor XIIIa and epithelial membrane antigen while negative for CD31, ERG, FLI-1, D2-40, smooth muscle actin, Desmin, S100, HMB-45, STAT6, MUC4, and keratins. RNA- and DNA-sequencing identified a YAP1::TFE3 fusion transcript that were subsequently corroborated by fluorescence in situ hybridization and immunohistochemistry for TFE3 (Xp11.23) locus rearrangement and strong, diffuse TFE3 immunoreactivity, respectively. To date, the YAP1::TFE3 fusion has only been identified in a subset of epithelioid hemangioendotheliomas and clear cell stromal tumors of the lung. This is the first report of a CFMN featuring a YAP1::TFE3 fusion (YAP1 Exon 1 and TFE3 Exon 4). The morphologic findings are unlike those previously described for epithelioid hemangioendothelioma and suggest that this neoplasm may represent a yet unclassified or novel CFMN entity. Although the patient is 1-year status postsurgical excision with no evidence of clinical recurrence, the clinical behavior of this novel entity remains to be fully characterized.

YAP1-TFE3-fused hemangioendothelioma: a multi-institutional clinicopathologic study of 24 genetically-confirmed cases

YAP1-TFE3-fused hemangioendothelioma is an extremely rare malignant vascular tumor. We present the largest multi-institutional clinicopathologic study of YAP1-TFE3-fused hemangioendothelioma to date. The 24 cases of YAP1-TFE3-fused hemangioendothelioma showed a female predominance (17 female, 7 male) across a wide age range (20-78 years old, median 44). Tumors were most commonly located in soft tissue (50%), followed by bone (29%), lung (13%), and liver (8%), ranging from 3 to 115 mm in size (median 40 mm). About two-thirds presented with multifocal disease, including 7 cases with distant organ metastasis. Histopathologically, we describe three dominant architectural patterns: solid sheets of coalescing nests, pseudoalveolar and (pseudo)vasoformative pattern, and discohesive strands and clusters of cells set in a myxoid to myxohyaline stroma. These patterns were present in variable proportions across different tumors and often coexisted within the same tumor. The dominant cytomorphology (88%) was large epithelioid cells with abundant, glassy eosinophilic to vacuolated cytoplasm, prominent nucleoli and well-demarcated cell borders. Multinucleated or binucleated cells, prominent admixed erythrocytic and lymphocytic infiltrates, and intratumoral fat were frequently present. Immunohistochemically, ERG, CD31, and TFE3 were consistently expressed, while expression of CD34 (83%) and cytokeratin AE1/AE3 (20%) was variable. CAMTA1 was negative in all but one case. All cases were confirmed by molecular testing to harbor YAP1-TFE3 gene fusions: majority with YAP1 exon 1 fused to TFE3 exon 4 (88%), or less commonly, TFE3 exon 6 (12%). Most patients (88%) were treated with primary surgical resection. Over a follow-up period of 4-360 months (median 36 months) in 17 cases, 35% of patients remained alive without disease, and 47% survived many years with stable, albeit multifocal and/or metastatic disease. Five-year progression-free survival probability was 88%. We propose categorizing YAP1-TFE3-fused hemangioendothelioma as a distinct disease entity given its unique clinical and histopathologic characteristics in comparison to conventional epithelioid hemangioendothelioma.