Molecular features of primary hepatic undifferentiated carcinoma

Genomic Analysis in the Categorization of Poorly Differentiated Primary Liver Carcinomas

A subset of primary liver carcinomas (PLCs) cannot be classified as hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) or intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (iCCA) based on morphology and immunohistochemistry (IHC). This includes tumors with morphology suggestive of HCC but lacking hepatocellular marker expression, tumors with ambiguous morphology characterized by co-expression of hepatocellular and cholangiocytic markers, and undifferentiated pleomorphic carcinomas with no discernible line of differentiation on morphology or IHC. This study examines the role of genomic analysis in the categorization of these tumors. Genomic analysis was performed on 16 PLCs that could not be definitely classified as HCC or iCCA based on morphology and IHC using a capture-based next-generation sequencing assay (n=15) or single gene mutational analysis (n=1). Genomic alterations in TERT promoter were seen in 9/16 cases (56%) and strongly favored HCC. Genomic alterations favoring iCCA were seen in 5/16 cases (31%) and included mutations in IDH1 , PBRM1 , BAP1 , and ERBB2 , as well as FGFR2 fusion. Genomic changes were helpful in classifying 14/16 (87%) PLCs. Though not specific, these genomic alterations can provide valuable diagnostic clues in selected morphologically and immunohistochemically unclassifiable cases. Given the important differences in management between HCC and iCCA, routine use of genomic analysis in diagnostically challenging settings should be considered.

Ancillary tests for hepatobiliary neoplasms: what we know and what we need to know

Ancillary tests are commonly used in the surgical pathology setting for diagnosing challenging neoplastic diseases of the liver and biliary tract, while histology and clinical correlation remain to be critically important. With continuous discoveries, more and more useful ancillary tests have become available, which can help distinguish between malignant and benign hepatocellular neoplasms, malignant and benign biliary tract entities, and intrahepatic and metastatic carcinomas. This review will focus on existing and emerging biomarkers (such as glutamine synthetase, organic anion transporting polypeptide 1B3, insulin-like growth factor-II mRNA binding protein-3, S100P, SMAD4, enhancer of zeste homolog 2, albumin, hepatocyte nuclear factor-1β, etc.) that can be used for the diagnosis, classification and prognostication of hepatobiliary neoplasms.

Undifferentiated hepatic carcinoma with osteoclast-like giant cells: A case report and literature review

Osteoclast-like giant cell tumor (OGCT) is a common bone tumor, occasionally observed in some extraosseous organs, but rarely involving the digestive system, especially the liver. Previously reported osteoclast-like giant cell carcinoma of the liver often coexists with sarcomatoid or hepatocellular carcinoma. Undifferentiated liver tumors with osteoclast-like giant cells (OGCs) are extremely rare. Due to its rarity, there is no consensus for diagnosis and treatment of undifferentiated liver tumors with OGCs. Definitive diagnosis comes from surgery, so there is often a long delay in diagnosis following the occurrence of symptoms. This case describes an extremely rare case of an undifferentiated liver tumor with OGCs in detail. It also summarizes the previously published cases based on liver tumors with OGCs from August 1980 to June 2021, providing extensive evidence to improve preoperative diagnosis and management options.