Usual interstitial pneumonia: a clinically significant pattern, but not the final word

Microscopic Small Airway Abnormalities Identified in Early Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis In Vivo Using Endobronchial Optical Coherence Tomography

Rationale: Idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) affects the subpleural lung but is considered to spare small airways. Micro-computed tomography (micro-CT) studies demonstrated small airway reduction in end-stage IPF explanted lungs, raising questions about small airway involvement in early-stage disease. Endobronchial optical coherence tomography (EB-OCT) is a volumetric imaging modality that detects microscopic features from subpleural to proximal airways. Objectives: In this study, EB-OCT was used to evaluate small airways in early IPF and control subjects in vivo. Methods: EB-OCT was performed in 12 subjects with IPF and 5 control subjects (matched by age, sex, smoking history, height, and body mass index). Subjects with IPF had early disease with mild restriction (FVC: 83.5% predicted), which was diagnosed per current guidelines and confirmed by surgical biopsy. EB-OCT volumetric imaging was acquired bronchoscopically in multiple, distinct, bilateral lung locations (total: 97 sites). IPF imaging sites were classified by severity into affected (all criteria for usual interstitial pneumonia present) and less affected (some but not all criteria for usual interstitial pneumonia present). Bronchiole count and small airway stereology metrics were measured for each EB-OCT imaging site. Measurements and Main Results: Compared with the number of bronchioles in control subjects (mean = 11.2/cm3; SD = 6.2), there was significant bronchiole reduction in subjects with IPF (42% loss; mean = 6.5/cm3; SD = 3.4; P = 0.0039), including in IPF affected (48% loss; mean: 5.8/cm3; SD: 2.8; P < 0.00001) and IPF less affected (33% loss; mean: 7.5/cm3; SD: 4.1; P = 0.024) sites. Stereology metrics showed that IPF-affected small airways were significantly larger, more distorted, and more irregular than in IPF-less affected sites and control subjects. IPF less affected and control airways were statistically indistinguishable for all stereology parameters (P = 0.36-1.0). Conclusions: EB-OCT demonstrated marked bronchiolar loss in early IPF (between 30% and 50%), even in areas minimally affected by disease, compared with matched control subjects. These findings support small airway disease as a feature of early IPF, providing novel insight into pathogenesis and potential therapeutic targets.

Multidisciplinary Approach to the Diagnosis of Idiopathic Interstitial Pneumonias: Focus on the Pathologist's Key Role

Idiopathic Interstitial Pneumonias (IIPs) are a heterogeneous group of the broader category of Interstitial Lung Diseases (ILDs), pathologically characterized by the distortion of lung parenchyma by interstitial inflammation and/or fibrosis. The American Thoracic Society (ATS)/European Respiratory Society (ERS) international multidisciplinary consensus classification of the IIPs was published in 2002 and then updated in 2013, with the authors emphasizing the need for a multidisciplinary approach to the diagnosis of IIPs. The histological evaluation of IIPs is challenging, and different types of IIPs are classically associated with specific histopathological patterns. However, morphological overlaps can be observed, and the same histopathological features can be seen in totally different clinical settings. Therefore, the pathologist's aim is to recognize the pathologic-morphologic pattern of disease in this clinical setting, and only after multi-disciplinary evaluation, if there is concordance between clinical and radiological findings, a definitive diagnosis of specific IIP can be established, allowing the optimal clinical-therapeutic management of the patient.

Pulmonary Pathology Society Survey on Practice Approaches in the Histologic Diagnosis of Fibrotic Interstitial Lung Disease: Consensus and Opportunities

CONTEXT.—

The pathologic diagnosis of usual interstitial pneumonia (UIP) remains a challenging area, and application of histologic UIP guidelines has proved difficult.

OBJECTIVE.—

To understand current practice approaches by pulmonary pathologists for the histologic diagnosis of UIP and other fibrotic interstitial lung diseases (ILDs).

DESIGN.—

The Pulmonary Pathology Society (PPS) ILD Working Group developed and sent a 5-part survey on fibrotic ILD electronically to the PPS membership.

RESULTS.—

One hundred sixty-one completed surveys were analyzed. Of the respondents, 89% reported using published histologic features in clinical guidelines for idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) in their pathologic diagnosis; however, there was variability in reporting terminology, quantity and quality of histologic features, and the use of guideline categorization. Respondents were very likely to have access to pulmonary pathology colleagues (79%), pulmonologists (98%), and radiologists (94%) to discuss cases. Half of respondents reported they may alter their pathologic diagnosis based on additional clinical and radiologic history if it is pertinent. Airway-centered fibrosis, granulomas, and types of inflammatory infiltrates were considered important, but there was poor agreement on how these features are defined.

CONCLUSIONS.—

There is significant consensus among the PPS membership on the importance of histologic guidelines/features of UIP. There are unmet needs for (1) consensus and standardization of diagnostic terminology and incorporation of recommended histopathologic categories from the clinical IPF guidelines into pathology reports, (2) agreement on how to incorporate into the report relevant clinical and radiographic information, and (3) defining the quantity and quality of features needed to suggest alternative diagnoses.

Histologic Analysis of Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis by Morphometric and Fractal Analysis

Idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) is a chronic, progressive fibrotic lung disorder, ultimately leading to respiratory failure and death. Despite great research advances in understanding the mechanisms underlying the disease, its diagnosis, and its treatment, IPF still remains idiopathic without known biological or histological markers able to predict disease progression or response to treatment. The histologic hallmark of IPF is usual interstitial pneumonia (UIP), with its intricate architectural distortion and temporal inhomogeneity. We hypothesize that normal lung alveolar architecture can be compared to fractals, such as the Pythagoras tree with its fractal dimension (D_f), and every pathological insult, distorting the normal lung structure, could result in D_f variations. In this study, we aimed to assess the UIP histologic fractal dimension in relationship to other morphometric parameters in newly diagnosed IPF patients and its possible role in the prognostic stratification of the disease. Clinical data and lung tissue specimens were obtained from twelve patients with IPF, twelve patients with non-specific interstitial pneumonia (NSIP), and age-matched "healthy" control lung tissue from patients undergoing lung surgery for other causes. Histology and histomorphometry were performed to evaluate D_f and lacunarity measures, using the box counting method on the FracLac ImageJ plugin. The results showed that D_f was significantly higher in IPF patients compared to controls and fibrotic NSIP patients, indicating greater architectural distortion in IPF. Additionally, high D_f values were associated with higher fibroblastic foci density and worse prognostic outcomes in IPF, suggesting that D_f may serve as a potential novel prognostic marker for IPF. The scalability of D_f measurements was demonstrated through repeated measurements on smaller portions from the same surgical biopsies, which were selected to mimic a cryobiopsy. Our study provides further evidence to support the use of fractal morphometry as a tool for quantifying and determining lung tissue remodeling in IPF, and we demonstrated a significant correlation between histological and radiological D_f in UIP pattern, as well as a significant association between D_f and FF density. Furthermore, our study demonstrates the scalability and self-similarity of D_f measurements across different biopsy types, including surgical and smaller specimens.

Diffuse idiopathic skeletal hyperostosis as a cause for dysphagia in a patient with ankylosing spondylitis

BACKGROUND

Diffuse idiopathic skeletal hyperostosis (DISH) is characterized by ankylosing spinal alterations which are often asymptomatic but may typically cause back pain and spinal stiffness. Presence of DISH may complicate spinal trauma and lead to unstable fractures requiring surgical intervention. Treatment options include physical activity, symptomatic treatment, local heat application, and optimization of metabolic comorbidities.

CASE

A multimorbid older patient was admitted to the gastroenterological ward for the investigation of progressive dysphagia and weight loss. Gastroscopy revealed a dorsal impression of the esophagus at 25 cm from the incisor. Clinical work-up including computed tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) ruled out malignancy but showed ankylosing spondylophytes and non-recent fractures of vertebrae C5-C7, compatible with DISH of the cervicothoracic spine as a cause for the esophageal impression. Notably, imaging diagnostics showed ankylosing spine alterations extending to the lumbar spine and both sacroiliac joints, suggestive of ankylosing spondylitis (AS). Typical imaging characteristics, a history of psoriasis, and positive HLA*B27 status supported the diagnosis of underlying AS in this patient with dysphagia as an unusual primary symptom of DISH. Additionally, pulmonary alterations compatible with a usual interstitial pneumonia (UIP)-like pattern were seen on lung CT.

CONCLUSION

Overlaps among AS, DISH and pulmonary abnormalities including UIP have been described previously; however, they represent unexpected findings in this older patient. This case underlines the importance of interdisciplinary collaboration and consideration of DISH as a differential diagnosis in patients with atypical symptoms.

Usual interstitial pneumonia (UIP): a clinically significant pathologic diagnosis

This editorial focuses on common issues that surround the diagnosis of usual interstitial pneumonia (UIP), a clinically significant pathologic diagnosis. Most of these issues stem from conflation of the pathologically defined entity UIP with the clinically defined entity IPF. A pathologic or radiologic diagnosis of UIP is required for the clinical/multidisciplinary diagnosis of idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) but it has also been described in several other clinical settings. I offer my viewpoint on 5 important questions. 1. Is UIP a diagnosis or a "pattern"?

ANSWER

UIP is a pathologic diagnosis and is better conceptualized as a "pattern" than as a specific clinical entity. Since all cases of UIP require pattern recognition, adding the word "pattern" to UIP is redundant. 2. Is pathology the gold standard for UIP?

ANSWER

Yes. 3. How do you "prove" etiology of a given case of UIP?

ANSWER

"Soft" histologic features can raise the possibility of certain etiologies but the final determination of etiology comes from the multidisciplinary team. With few exceptions, there are no findings pathognomonic for any etiology in UIP. 4. Does UIP imply IPF?

ANSWER

No. 5. What should we do when pathology and HRCT are discordant?

ANSWER

This depends on the specifics of the discrepancy. When HRCT suggests a non-UIP diagnosis such as NSIP and histology shows UIP, histology has been shown to predict prognosis in multiple studies. In other settings, the radiologic impression based on HRCT is often proven to be incorrect by the histologic findings.