Discontinuation of deep brain stimulation to the medial forebrain bundle leads to depression relapse: considerations when reinstating stimulation

Emerging Outlook on Personalized Neuromodulation for Depression: Insights From Tractography-Based Targeting

BACKGROUND

Deep brain stimulation has shown promise in treating individual patients with treatment-resistant depression, but larger-scale trials have been less successful. Here, we created what is, to our knowledge, the largest meta-analysis with individual patient data to date to explore whether the use of tractography enhances the efficacy of deep brain stimulation for treatment-resistant depression.

METHODS

We systematically reviewed 1823 articles, selecting 32 that contributed data from 366 patients. We stratified the individual patient data based on stimulation target and use of tractography. Using 2-way type III analysis of variance, Welch's 2-sample t tests, and mixed-effects linear regression models, we evaluated changes in depression severity 1 year (9-15 months) postoperatively and at last follow-up (4 weeks to 8 years) as assessed by depression scales.

RESULTS

Tractography was used for medial forebrain bundle (MFB) (n = 17 tractography/32 total), subcallosal cingulate (SCC) (n = 39 tractography/241 total), and ventral capsule/ventral striatum (n = 3 tractography/41 total) targets; it was not used for bed nucleus of stria terminalis (n = 11), lateral habenula (n = 10), and inferior thalamic peduncle (n = 1). Across all patients, tractography significantly improved mean depression scores at 1 year (p < .001) and last follow-up (p = .009). Within the target cohorts, tractography improved depression scores at 1 year for both MFB and SCC, though significance was met only at the α = 0.1 level (SCC: β = 15.8%, p = .09; MFB: β = 52.4%, p = .10). Within the tractography cohort, patients with MFB tractography showed greater improvement than patients with SCC tractography (72.42 ± 7.17% vs. 54.78 ± 4.08%) at 1 year (p = .044).

CONCLUSIONS

Our findings underscore the promise of tractography in deep brain stimulation for treatment-resistant depression as a method for personalization of therapy, supporting its inclusion in future trials.

Outcome differences between males and females undergoing deep brain stimulation for treatment-resistant depression: systematic review and individual patient data meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Treatment-resistant depression (TRD) occurs more commonly in women. Deep brain stimulation (DBS) is an emerging treatment for TRD, and its efficacy continues to be explored. However, differences in treatment outcomes between males and females have yet to be explored in formal analysis.

METHODS

A PRISMA-compliant systematic review of DBS for TRD studies was conducted. Patient-level data were independently extracted by two authors. Treatment response was defined as a 50 % or greater reduction in depression score. Percent change in depression scores by gender were evaluated using random-effects analyses.

RESULTS

Of 737 records, 19 studies (129 patients) met inclusion criteria. The mean reduction in depression score for females was 57.7 % (95 % CI, 64.33 %-51.13 %), whereas for males it was 35.2 % (95 % CI, 45.12 %-25.23 %) (p < 0.0001). Females were more likely to respond to DBS for TRD when compared to males (OR = 2.44, 95 % CI 1.06, 1.95). These differences varied in significance when stratified by DBS anatomical target, age, and timeframe for responder classification.

LIMITATIONS

Studies included were open-label trials with small sample sizes.

CONCLUSIONS

Our findings suggest that females with TRD respond at higher rates to DBS treatment than males. Further research is needed to elucidate the implications of these results, which may include connectomic sexual dimorphism, depression phenotype variations, or unrecognized symptom reporting differences. Methodological standardization of outcome scales, granular demographic data, and individual subject outcomes would allow for more robust comparisons between trials.