1
|
Braddock M. Do Not Risk Homicide: Abortion After 10 Weeks Gestation. THE JOURNAL OF MEDICINE AND PHILOSOPHY 2024; 49:414-432. [PMID: 38728420 DOI: 10.1093/jmp/jhae018] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/12/2024] Open
Abstract
When an abortion is performed, someone dies. Are we killing a human person? Widespread disagreement exists. However, it is not necessary to establish personhood in order to establish the wrongness of abortion: a substantial chance of personhood is enough. We defend The Do Not Risk Homicide Argument: abortions are wrong after 10 weeks gestation because they substantially and unjustifiably risk homicide, the unjust killing of a human person. Why 10 weeks? Because the cumulative evidence establishes a substantial chance (a more than one in five chance) that preborn human beings are persons after 10 weeks (if not before then). We submit evidence from our bad track record, widespread disagreement about personhood (after 10 weeks gestation), problems with theories of personhood, the similarity between preborn human beings and premature newborns, miscalculations of gestational age, and the common intuitive responses of women to their pregnancies and miscarriages. Our argument is cogent because it bypasses the stalemate over preborn personhood and rests on common ground rather than contentious metaphysics. It also strongly suggests that society must do more to protect preborn human beings. We briefly discuss its practical implications for fetal pain relief, social policy, and abortion law.
Collapse
|
2
|
Mohamed SHM, Reissland N, Anand KJS. An Evidence-Based Discussion of Fetal Pain and Stress. Neonatology 2024:1-7. [PMID: 38781940 DOI: 10.1159/000538848] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/15/2024] [Accepted: 04/10/2024] [Indexed: 05/25/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The concept of fetal pain results from procedures conducted without anesthesia in preterm newborns and fetuses, which indicate that it is possible to examine fetal pain based on stress hormone, metabolic, and behavioral changes. Anatomical and physiological data suggest that fetuses become capable of processing nociceptive stimuli around midgestation, although the associated changes in fetal brain development remain unclear. What constitutes fetal pain remains controversial in the light of the definition of pain adopted by the International Association for the Study of Pain (IASP), which posits pain as an "unpleasant sensory and emotional experience." SUMMARY Here, we examine the notion that human fetuses cannot "experience" pain and potential implications of this claim. We highlight the key scientific evidence related to fetal pain, including clinical studies on pain in fetuses and preterm newborns. We argue that consistent patterns of stress hormones, metabolic changes, body movements, hemodynamic changes, and pain-related facial expressions in fetuses exposed to invasive procedures overcome the need for subjective proof of pain as articulated in the IASP definition. No study to date has conclusively proven the absence of fetal pain beyond the age of viability. KEY MESSAGES Based on the current evidence, we propose that all fetuses receive anesthesia regardless of the invasive procedures being performed to guarantee the least possible pain and physiological, behavioral, or hormonal responses without exposing the mother or her baby to unnecessary complications.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Samirah H M Mohamed
- Obstetric Clinic at the Clinics Hospital of the Medical School, The University of São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil
- Research Department of the Hospital e Maternidade Vitória, São Paulo, Brazil
- Medical Tutor at the University Center of the Faculty of the Americas, São Paulo, Brazil
| | | | - Kanwaljeet J S Anand
- Departments of Pediatrics, Perioperative, and Pain Medicine, Stanford Child Wellness Lab, Maternal & Child Health Research Institute, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California, USA
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Bernardes LS, Fernandes AM, Carvalho MA, Ottolia J, Hamani M, Oliveira I, Kubota GT, da Silva VA, Veloso A, de Carvalho MHB, de Amorim Filho AG, Arenholt LTS, Leutscher PC, de Andrade DC. Assessment of Human Fetuses Undergoing Acute Pain: Validation of the Fetal-7 Scale. THE JOURNAL OF PAIN 2024:104527. [PMID: 38599264 DOI: 10.1016/j.jpain.2024.104527] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/23/2024] [Revised: 03/24/2024] [Accepted: 04/02/2024] [Indexed: 04/12/2024]
Abstract
Improvements in fetal ultrasound have allowed for the diagnosis and treatment of fetal diseases in the uterus, often through surgery. However, little attention has been drawn to the assessment of fetal pain. To address this gap, a fetal pain scoring system, known as the Fetal-7 scale, was developed. The present study is a full validation of the Fetal-7 scale. The validation involved 2 steps: 1) 4 fetuses with the indication of surgery were evaluated in 3 conditions perioperatively: acute pain, rest, and under loud sound stimulation. Facial expressions were assessed by 30 raters using screenshots from 4D high-definition ultrasound films; 2) assessment of sensitivity and specificity of the Fetal-7 scale in 54 healthy fetuses and 2 fetuses undergoing acute pain after preoperative anesthetic intramuscular injection. There was high internal consistency with Cronbach's alpha (α) of .99. Intrarater reliability of the Fetal-7 scale (test-retest) calculated by intraclass correlation coefficient was .95, and inter-rater reliability was .99. The scale accurately differentiated between healthy fetuses at rest and those experiencing acute pain (sensitivity of 100% and specificity of 94.4%). The Fetal-7 scale is a valid tool for assessing acute pain-related behavior in third-trimester fetuses and may be of value in guiding analgesic procedures efficacy in these patients. Further research is warranted to explore the presence of postoperative pain in fetuses and its effects after birth. PERSPECTIVE: Recordings with 3-dimensional ultrasound of human fetuses undergoing preoperative anesthetic injections revealed complex facial expressions during acute pain, similar to those collected in newborns. This study presented the validation process and cut-off value of the Fetal-7 scale, paving the way for the study of pain before birth in humans.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lisandra S Bernardes
- Center for Clinical Research, North Denmark Regional Hospital, Hjoerring, Denmark; Gynecology and Obstetrics Department, University of Sao Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil; Gynecology and obstetrics, SEPACO Maternity Hospital, São Paulo, Brazil; Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, North Denmark Regional Hospital, Hjoerring, Denmark.
| | - Ana M Fernandes
- Pain Center, Department of Neurology, University of Sao Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil
| | - Mariana A Carvalho
- Gynecology and Obstetrics Department, University of Sao Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil; Gynecology and obstetrics, SEPACO Maternity Hospital, São Paulo, Brazil
| | - Juliana Ottolia
- Gynecology and Obstetrics Department, University of Sao Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil; Gynecology and obstetrics, SEPACO Maternity Hospital, São Paulo, Brazil
| | - Michele Hamani
- Pain Center, Department of Neurology, University of Sao Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil
| | - Inaeh Oliveira
- Pain Center, Department of Neurology, University of Sao Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil
| | - Gabriel T Kubota
- Pain Center, Department of Neurology, University of Sao Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil
| | - Valquíria A da Silva
- Pain Center, Department of Neurology, University of Sao Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil
| | - Adriano Veloso
- Computational Science Department, Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais, Belo Horizonte, Brazil
| | | | | | - Louise T S Arenholt
- Center for Clinical Research, North Denmark Regional Hospital, Hjoerring, Denmark; Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, North Denmark Regional Hospital, Hjoerring, Denmark; Department of Clinical Medicine, Aalborg University, Aalborg, Denmark
| | - Peter C Leutscher
- Center for Clinical Research, North Denmark Regional Hospital, Hjoerring, Denmark; Department of Clinical Medicine, Aalborg University, Aalborg, Denmark
| | - Daniel C de Andrade
- Center for Neuroplasticity and Pain, Health Science and Technology, Faculty of Medicine, Aalborg University, Aalborg, Denmark; Pain Center, Department of Neurology, University of Sao Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Handlogten K. Pediatric regional anesthesiology: a narrative review and update on outcome-based advances. Int Anesthesiol Clin 2024; 62:69-78. [PMID: 38063039 DOI: 10.1097/aia.0000000000000421] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/18/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Kathryn Handlogten
- Department of Anesthesiology and Perioperative Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Bellieni C. The RCOG statement on foetal pain: Still much to do. Eur J Pain 2023. [PMID: 36897247 DOI: 10.1002/ejp.2109] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/19/2023] [Revised: 03/06/2023] [Accepted: 03/08/2023] [Indexed: 03/11/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Carlo Bellieni
- Department of Pediatrics, University of Siena, Siena, Italy.,Bioethics Committee of the Tuscany Region, Florence, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Thill B. The fetal pain paradox. FRONTIERS IN PAIN RESEARCH 2023; 4:1128530. [PMID: 37025166 PMCID: PMC10072285 DOI: 10.3389/fpain.2023.1128530] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/20/2022] [Accepted: 02/21/2023] [Indexed: 04/08/2023] Open
Abstract
Controversy exists as to when conscious pain perception in the fetus may begin. According to the hypothesis of cortical necessity, thalamocortical connections, which do not form until after 24-28 weeks gestation, are necessary for conscious pain perception. However, anesthesiologists and neonatologists treat age-matched neonates as both conscious and pain-capable due to observable and measurable behavioral, hormonal, and physiologic indicators of pain. In preterm infants, these multimodal indicators of pain are uncontroversial, and their presence, despite occurring prior to functional thalamocortical connections, has guided the use of analgesics in neonatology and fetal surgery for decades. However, some medical groups state that below 24 weeks gestation, there is no pain capacity. Thus, a paradox exists in the disparate acknowledgment of pain capability in overlapping patient populations. Brain networks vary by age. During the first and second trimesters, the cortical subplate, a unique structure that is present only during fetal and early neonatal development, forms the first cortical network. In the third trimester, the cortical plate assumes this function. According to the subplate modulation hypothesis, a network of connections to the subplate and subcortical structures is sufficient to facilitate conscious pain perception in the fetus and the preterm neonate prior to 24 weeks gestation. Therefore, similar to other fetal and neonatal systems that have a transitional phase (i.e., circulatory system), there is now strong evidence for transitional developmental phases of fetal and neonatal pain circuitry.
Collapse
|
7
|
Duci M, Pulvirenti R, Fascetti Leon F, Capolupo I, Veronese P, Gamba P, Tognon C. Anesthesia for fetal operative procedures: A systematic review. FRONTIERS IN PAIN RESEARCH 2022; 3:935427. [PMID: 36246050 PMCID: PMC9554945 DOI: 10.3389/fpain.2022.935427] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/03/2022] [Accepted: 08/24/2022] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
ObjectiveThe anesthetic management of fetal operative procedures (FOP) is a highly debated topic. Literature on fetal pain perception and response to external stimuli is rapidly expanding. Nonetheless, there is no consensus on the fetal consciousness nor on the instruments to measure pain levels. As a result, no guidelines or clinical recommendations on anesthesia modality during FOP are available. This systematic literature review aimed to collect the available knowledge on the most common fetal interventions, and summarize the reported outcomes for each anesthetic approach. Additional aim was to provide an overall evaluation of the most commonly used anesthetic agents.MethodsTwo systematic literature searches were performed in Embase, Medline, Web of Science Core Collection and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials up to December 2021. To best cover the available evidence, one literature search was mostly focused on fetal surgical procedures; while anesthesia during FOP was the main target for the second search. The following fetal procedures were included: fetal transfusion, laser ablation of placental anastomosis, twin-reversed arterial perfusion treatment, fetoscopic endoluminal tracheal occlusion, thoraco-amniotic shunt, vesico-amniotic shunt, myelomeningocele repair, resection of sacrococcygeal teratoma, ligation of amniotic bands, balloon valvuloplasty/septoplasty, ex-utero intrapartum treatment, and ovarian cyst resection/aspiration. Yielded articles were screened against the same inclusion criteria. Studies reporting anesthesia details and procedures’ outcomes were considered. Descriptive statistical analysis was performed and findings were reported in a narrative manner.ResultsThe literature searches yielded 1,679 articles, with 429 being selected for full-text evaluation. A total of 168 articles were included. Overall, no significant differences were found among procedures performed under maternal anesthesia or maternal-fetal anesthesia. Procedures requiring invasive fetal manipulation resulted to be more effective when performed under maternal anesthesia only. Based on the available data, a wide range of anesthetic agents are currently deployed and no consistency has been found neither between centers nor procedures.ConclusionsThis systematic review shows great variance in the anesthetic management during FOP. Further studies, systematically reporting intraoperative fetal monitoring and fetal hormonal responses to external stimuli, are necessary to identify the best anesthetic approach. Additional investigations on pain pathways and fetal pain perception are advisable.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Miriam Duci
- Pediatric Surgery Unit, Department of Women’s and Children’s Health, Padua University Hospital, Padua, Italy
| | - Rebecca Pulvirenti
- Pediatric Surgery Unit, Department of Women’s and Children’s Health, Padua University Hospital, Padua, Italy
| | - Francesco Fascetti Leon
- Pediatric Surgery Unit, Department of Women’s and Children’s Health, Padua University Hospital, Padua, Italy
- Correspondence: Francesco Fascetti Leon
| | - Irma Capolupo
- Department of Medical and Surgical Neonatology, Bambino Gesù Children’s Hospital, IRCCS, Rome, Italy
| | - Paola Veronese
- Maternal-fetal Medicine Unit, Department of Women’s and Children’s Health, Padua University Hospital, Padua, Italy
| | - Piergiorgio Gamba
- Pediatric Surgery Unit, Department of Women’s and Children’s Health, Padua University Hospital, Padua, Italy
| | - Costanza Tognon
- Anesthesiology Pediatric Unit, Department of Women’s and Children’s Health, Padua University Hospital, Padua, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Abstract
Fetal pain perception has important implications for fetal surgery, as well as for abortion. Current neuroscientific evidence indicates the possibility of fetal pain perception during the first trimester (<14 weeks gestation). Evidence for this conclusion is based on the following findings: (1) the neural pathways for pain perception via the cortical subplate are present as early as 12 weeks gestation, and via the thalamus as early as 7–8 weeks gestation; (2) the cortex is not necessary for pain to be experienced; (3) consciousness is mediated by subcortical structures, such as the thalamus and brainstem, which begin to develop during the first trimester; (4) the neurochemicals in utero do not cause fetal unconsciousness; and (5) the use of fetal analgesia suppresses the hormonal, physiologic, and behavioral responses to pain, avoiding the potential for both short- and long-term sequelae. As the medical evidence has shifted in acknowledging fetal pain perception prior to viability, there has been a gradual change in the fetal pain debate, from disputing the existence of fetal pain to debating the significance of fetal pain. The presence of fetal pain creates tension in the practice of medicine with respect to beneficence and nonmaleficence.
Collapse
|
9
|
|
10
|
Agakidou E, Tsoni K, Stathopoulou T, Thomaidou A, Farini M, Kontou A, Karagianni P, Sarafidis K. Changes in Physicians' Perceptions and Practices on Neonatal Pain Management Over the Past 20 Years. A Survey Conducted at Two Time-Points. Front Pediatr 2021; 9:667806. [PMID: 34150688 PMCID: PMC8211759 DOI: 10.3389/fped.2021.667806] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/14/2021] [Accepted: 05/12/2021] [Indexed: 01/02/2023] Open
Abstract
Intense research for more than three decades expelled the view that neonates do not experience pain. The aim of this survey was to investigate whether the Greek physicians involved in neonatal intensive care have changed their perceptions regarding neonatal pain, adapting their management practices to the knowledge that have emerged in the past 20-years. This study is a survey conducted at two time-points, 20 years apart. Anonymous questionnaires were distributed to 117 and 145 physicians working in neonatal intensive care units (NICUs) all over Greece in years 2000 and 2019, respectively. The response rate was 90.6 and 80.7% in 2000 and 2019, respectively. All respondents, at both time-points, believed that neonates experience pain, which has serious acute and long-term consequences, while the vast majority considered analgesia-sedation (A-S) during painful interventions as obligatory. Utilization of NICU protocols and pain assessment tools remained low although increased significantly between 2000 and 2019. The use of systemic A-S postoperatively was high at both time-points, while its implementation in infants subjected to prolonged pain, specifically mechanical ventilation, increased significantly by 2019. Systemic or local analgesia for acute procedural pain was used by lower proportions of physicians in 2019, except for the tracheal intubation. In contrast, the use of sweet solutions and non-pharmacological measures prior to or during bedside procedures significantly increased over time. Opioid administration significantly increased, while a shift from morphine to fentanyl was observed. International literature and perinatal-neonatal congresses were stated as the main sources of updating physicians' knowledge and improving management practice on neonatal pain prevention and treatment. In conclusion, Greek NICU-physicians' perceptions that neonates can experience pain with potentially serious acute and long-term consequences remained strong over the past 20 years. Although physicians' practices on neonatal pain management improved, they are still suboptimal, while significant differences exist among centers. Continuing education, globally accepted management protocols, and readily applied pain assessment tools would further improve the management of procedural pain and stress in neonates.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Eleni Agakidou
- 1st Department of Neonatology and Neonatal Intensive Care, School of Medicine, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Ippokrateion General Hospital, Thessaloniki, Greece
| | - Konstantia Tsoni
- 1st Department of Neonatology and Neonatal Intensive Care, School of Medicine, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Ippokrateion General Hospital, Thessaloniki, Greece
| | - Theodora Stathopoulou
- 1st Department of Neonatology and Neonatal Intensive Care, School of Medicine, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Ippokrateion General Hospital, Thessaloniki, Greece
| | - Agathi Thomaidou
- 1st Department of Neonatology and Neonatal Intensive Care, School of Medicine, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Ippokrateion General Hospital, Thessaloniki, Greece
| | - Maria Farini
- 1st Department of Neonatology and Neonatal Intensive Care, School of Medicine, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Ippokrateion General Hospital, Thessaloniki, Greece
| | - Angeliki Kontou
- 1st Department of Neonatology and Neonatal Intensive Care, School of Medicine, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Ippokrateion General Hospital, Thessaloniki, Greece
| | - Paraskevi Karagianni
- 1st Department of Neonatology and Neonatal Intensive Care, School of Medicine, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Ippokrateion General Hospital, Thessaloniki, Greece
| | - Kosmas Sarafidis
- 1st Department of Neonatology and Neonatal Intensive Care, School of Medicine, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Ippokrateion General Hospital, Thessaloniki, Greece
| |
Collapse
|