Why monitor the neonatal brain-that is the important question

Seizures after initiation of rewarming in cooled infants with hypoxic ischaemic encephalopathy

BACKGROUND

Seizures after initiation of rewarming from therapeutic hypothermia for neonatal encephalopathy are well recognised but not easy to predict.

METHODS

A secondary analysis was performed of NEOLEV2 trial data, a multicentre randomised trial of levetiracetam versus phenobarbital for neonatal seizures. Enrolled infants underwent continuous video EEG (cEEG) monitoring. The trial data were reviewed for 42 infants with seizures during therapeutic hypothermia and 118 infants who received therapeutic hypothermia but had no seizures on cEEG.

RESULTS

Overall, 112 of 160 (70%) had cEEG monitoring continued until rewarming was completed. Of the 42 infants with prior seizures, there were 30 infants with valid cEEG available and seizures occurred following the initiation of rewarming in 8 (26.6%). For the 118 seizure-naive infants, 82 (69.5%) continued cEEG until either rewarming was completed or 90 h of age and none had documented seizures.

CONCLUSION

Overall, just over a quarter of infants with prior seizures had cEEG evidence of at least one seizure in the 24 h after initiation of rewarming but no seizure-naive infant had cEEG evidence of seizure(s) on rewarming. Critically, by reporting the two groups separately, the data can provide guidance on the duration of EEG monitoring.

IMPACT

Infants with hypoxic ischaemic encephalopathy who have cEEG evidence of seizures during therapeutic hypothermia have a significant risk of further seizures on rewarming. For infants with hypoxic ischaemic encephalopathy but no cEEG evidence of seizures during therapeutic hypothermia, there is very little risk of de novo seizures. Ongoing work utilising large cohorts may generate EEG criteria that refine estimates of risk for rewarming seizures. Based on current experience, if seizures have occurred during therapeutic hypothermia for hypoxic ischaemic encephalopathy, the EEG monitoring should be continued during rewarming and for 12 h thereafter to minimise the risk of missing an event.

Continuous electroencephalography in the intensive care unit: A critical review and position statement from an Australian and New Zealand perspective

Objectives

This article aims to critically review the literature on continuous electroencephalography (cEEG) monitoring in the intensive care unit (ICU) from an Australian and New Zealand perspective and provide recommendations for clinicians.

Design and review methods

A taskforce of adult and paediatric neurologists, selected by the Epilepsy Society of Australia, reviewed the literature on cEEG for seizure detection in critically ill neonates, children, and adults in the ICU. The literature on routine EEG and cEEG for other indications was not reviewed. Following an evaluation of the evidence and discussion of controversial issues, consensus was reached, and a document that highlighted important clinical, practical, and economic considerations regarding cEEG in Australia and New Zealand was drafted.

Results

This review represents a summary of the literature and consensus opinion regarding the use of cEEG in the ICU for detection of seizures, highlighting gaps in evidence, practical problems with implementation, funding shortfalls, and areas for future research.

Conclusion

While cEEG detects electrographic seizures in a significant proportion of at-risk neonates, children, and adults in the ICU, conferring poorer neurological outcomes and guiding treatment in many settings, the health economic benefits of treating such seizures remain to be proven. Presently, cEEG in Australian and New Zealand ICUs is a largely unfunded clinical resource that is subsequently reserved for the highest-impact patient groups. Wider adoption of cEEG requires further research into impact on functional and health economic outcomes, education and training of the neurology and ICU teams involved, and securement of the necessary resources and funding to support the service.

Neuromonitoring in neonatal critical care part I: neonatal encephalopathy and neonates with possible seizures

The blooming of neonatal neurocritical care over the last decade reflects substantial advances in neuromonitoring and neuroprotection. The most commonly used brain monitoring tools in the neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) are amplitude integrated EEG (aEEG), full multichannel continuous EEG (cEEG), and near-infrared spectroscopy (NIRS). While some published guidelines address individual tools, there is no consensus on consistent, efficient, and beneficial use of these modalities in common NICU scenarios. This work reviews current evidence to assist decision making for best utilization of neuromonitoring modalities in neonates with encephalopathy or with possible seizures. Neuromonitoring approaches in extremely premature and critically ill neonates are discussed separately in the companion paper. IMPACT: Neuromonitoring techniques hold promise for improving neonatal care. For neonatal encephalopathy, aEEG can assist in screening for eligibility for therapeutic hypothermia, though should not be used to exclude otherwise eligible neonates. Continuous cEEG, aEEG and NIRS through rewarming can assist in prognostication. For neonates with possible seizures, cEEG is the gold standard for detection and diagnosis. If not available, aEEG as a screening tool is superior to clinical assessment alone. The use of seizure detection algorithms can help with timely seizures detection at the bedside.