1
|
Liu Y, Hatano K, Nonomura N. Liquid Biomarkers in Prostate Cancer Diagnosis: Current Status and Emerging Prospects. World J Mens Health 2024; 42:42.e45. [PMID: 38772530 DOI: 10.5534/wjmh.230386] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/31/2023] [Revised: 01/12/2024] [Accepted: 01/22/2024] [Indexed: 05/23/2024] Open
Abstract
Prostate cancer (PCa) is a major health concern that necessitates appropriate diagnostic approaches for timely intervention. This review critically evaluates the role of liquid biopsy techniques, focusing on blood- and urine-based biomarkers, in overcoming the limitations of conventional diagnostic methods. The 4Kscore test and Prostate Health Index have demonstrated efficacy in distinguishing PCa from benign conditions. Urinary biomarker tests such as PCa antigen 3, MyProstateScore, SelectMDx, and ExoDx Prostate IntelliScore test have revolutionized risk stratification and minimized unnecessary biopsies. Emerging biomarkers, including non-coding RNAs, circulating tumor DNA, and prostate-specific antigen (PSA) glycosylation, offer valuable insights into PCa biology, enabling personalized treatment strategies. Advancements in non-invasive liquid biomarkers for PCa diagnosis may facilitate the stratification of patients and avoid unnecessary biopsies, particularly when PSA is in the gray area of 4 to 10 ng/mL.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yutong Liu
- Department of Urology, Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine, Suita, Japan
| | - Koji Hatano
- Department of Urology, Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine, Suita, Japan.
| | - Norio Nonomura
- Department of Urology, Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine, Suita, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Park H, Lee SW, Song G, Kang TW, Jung JH, Chung HC, Kim SJ, Park JY, Shin TY, Kim JH. Preoperative prostate health index and %p2PSA as the significant biomarkers of postoperative pathological outcomes of prostate cancer in Korean males: A prospective multi-institutional study. Investig Clin Urol 2019; 61:42-50. [PMID: 31942462 PMCID: PMC6946816 DOI: 10.4111/icu.2020.61.1.42] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/31/2019] [Accepted: 09/15/2019] [Indexed: 01/01/2023] Open
Abstract
Purpose To evaluate the clinical utility of percentage of serum prostate-specific antigen (proPSA) to free PSA (%p2PSA) and the prostate health index (PHI) for predicting aggressive pathological outcomes of radical prostatectomy (RP) in Korean males. Materials and Methods This prospective observational multicenter study included 160 Korean males who consecutively underwent RP. The predictive utility of preoperative %p2PSA and PHI for predicting the following pathological outcomes of RP including pT3 disease, pathologic Gleason sum ≥7, and Gleason sum upgrading was investigated using multivariate and decision-curve analyses. Results The PHI and %p2PSA levels were significantly higher in patients with pT3 disease, pathologic Gleason sum ≥7, and Gleason sum upgrading. On univariate analysis, PHI was an accurate predictor of pT3 disease, pathologic Gleason sum ≥7, and Gleason sum upgrading. Multivariate and decision curve analyses revealed that inclusion of PHI to a base multivariate model including total PSA, percentage free PSA, PSA density, percentage of positive biopsy core, biopsy Gleason sum, and clinical stage factors significantly increased its predictive accuracy; %p2PSA showed a similar result. However, PHI was a more valuable predictor of pathological outcomes of RP. Conclusions This study revealed PHI and %p2PSA as preoperative biomarkers of pathological outcomes in Korean males who underwent RP for prostate cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hongzoo Park
- Department of Urology, Kangwon National University School of Medicine, Chuncheon, Korea
| | - Sang Wook Lee
- Department of Urology, Kangwon National University School of Medicine, Chuncheon, Korea
| | - Geehyun Song
- Department of Urology, Kangwon National University School of Medicine, Chuncheon, Korea
| | - Tae Wook Kang
- Department of Urology, Wonju Severance Christian Hospital, Yonsei University Wonju College of Medicine, Wonju, Korea
| | - Jae Hung Jung
- Department of Urology, Wonju Severance Christian Hospital, Yonsei University Wonju College of Medicine, Wonju, Korea
| | - Hyun Chul Chung
- Department of Urology, Wonju Severance Christian Hospital, Yonsei University Wonju College of Medicine, Wonju, Korea
| | - Sung Jin Kim
- Department of Urology, Gangneung Asan Hospital, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Gangneung, Korea
| | - Jong Yeon Park
- Department of Urology, Gangneung Asan Hospital, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Gangneung, Korea
| | - Tae Young Shin
- Department of Urology, Hallym University Chuncheon Sacred Heart Hospital, Hallym University College of Medicine, Chuncheon, Korea
| | - Jeong Hyun Kim
- Department of Urology, Kangwon National University School of Medicine, Chuncheon, Korea
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Huang YP, Lin TP, Cheng WM, Wei TC, Huang IS, Fan YH, Lin CC, Huang EYH, Chung HJ, Kuo JY, Wu HHH, Lu SH, Chang YH, Lin ATL, Huang WJS. Prostate health index density predicts aggressive pathological outcomes after radical prostatectomy in Taiwanese patients. J Chin Med Assoc 2019; 82:835-839. [PMID: 31425303 DOI: 10.1097/jcma.0000000000000169] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/26/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND There are models to predict pathological outcomes based on established clinical and prostate-specific antigen (PSA)-derived parameters; however, they are not satisfactory. p2PSA and its derived biomarkers have shown promise for the diagnosis and prognosis of prostate cancer (PCa). The aim of this study was to investigate whether p2PSA-derived biomarkers can assist in the prediction of aggressive pathological outcomes after radical prostatectomy (RP). METHODS We prospectively enrolled patients who were diagnosed with PCa and treated with RP between February 2017 and December 2018. Preoperative blood samples were analyzed for tPSA, free PSA (fPSA), percentage of fPSA (%fPSA), [-2]proPSA (p2PSA), and percentage of p2PSA (%p2PSA). Prostate health index (PHI) was calculated as (p2PSA/fPSA) × √tPSA. Prostate volume was determined by transrectal ultrasound using the ellipsoid formula, and PHI density was calculated as PHI/prostate volume. The areas under the receiver operating characteristic curve were estimated for various PSA/p2PSA derivatives. Aggressive pathological outcomes measured after RP were defined as pathological T3 or a Gleason score (GS) >6 as determined in RP specimens. RESULTS One hundred and forty-four patients were included for analysis. Postoperative GS was >6 in 86.1% of the patients, and pT stage was T3a or more in 54.2%. Among all PSA- and p2PSA-derived biomarkers, PHI density was the best biomarker to predict aggressive pathological outcomes after RP. The odds ratio of having an aggressive pathological outcome of RP was 8.796 (p = 0.001). In multivariate analysis, adding %fPSA to base model did not improve the accuracy (area under curve), but adding PHI and PHI density to base model improved the accuracy by 2% and 16%, respectively, in predicting pT3 stage or GS ≥ 7. The risk of pT3 stage or GS ≥ 7 was 20.8% for PHI density <1.125, and 64.6% for PHI density >1.125 (sensitivity: 74.6% and specificity: 88.9%). CONCLUSION PHI density may further aid in predicting aggressive pathological outcomes after RP. This biomarker may be useful in preoperative counseling and may have potential in decision making when choosing between definitive treatment and active surveillance of newly diagnosed PCa.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yu-Pin Huang
- Department of Urology, Taipei Veterans General Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan, ROC
| | - Tzu-Ping Lin
- Department of Urology, Taipei Veterans General Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan, ROC
- Department of Urology, School of Medicine, National Yang-Ming University, Taipei, Taiwan, ROC
- Shu-Tien Urological Institute, Taipei, Taiwan, ROC
| | - Wei-Ming Cheng
- Department of Urology, School of Medicine, National Yang-Ming University, Taipei, Taiwan, ROC
- Shu-Tien Urological Institute, Taipei, Taiwan, ROC
- Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, Taipei City Hospital Zhongxiao Branch, Taipei, Taiwan, ROC
| | - Tzu-Chun Wei
- Department of Urology, Taipei Veterans General Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan, ROC
- Department of Urology, School of Medicine, National Yang-Ming University, Taipei, Taiwan, ROC
- Shu-Tien Urological Institute, Taipei, Taiwan, ROC
| | - I-Shen Huang
- Department of Urology, Taipei Veterans General Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan, ROC
- Department of Urology, School of Medicine, National Yang-Ming University, Taipei, Taiwan, ROC
- Shu-Tien Urological Institute, Taipei, Taiwan, ROC
| | - Yu-Hua Fan
- Department of Urology, Taipei Veterans General Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan, ROC
- Department of Urology, School of Medicine, National Yang-Ming University, Taipei, Taiwan, ROC
- Shu-Tien Urological Institute, Taipei, Taiwan, ROC
| | - Chih-Chieh Lin
- Department of Urology, Taipei Veterans General Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan, ROC
- Department of Urology, School of Medicine, National Yang-Ming University, Taipei, Taiwan, ROC
- Shu-Tien Urological Institute, Taipei, Taiwan, ROC
| | - Eric Y H Huang
- Department of Urology, Taipei Veterans General Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan, ROC
- Department of Urology, School of Medicine, National Yang-Ming University, Taipei, Taiwan, ROC
- Shu-Tien Urological Institute, Taipei, Taiwan, ROC
| | - Hsiao-Jen Chung
- Department of Urology, Taipei Veterans General Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan, ROC
- Department of Urology, School of Medicine, National Yang-Ming University, Taipei, Taiwan, ROC
- Shu-Tien Urological Institute, Taipei, Taiwan, ROC
| | - Junne-Yih Kuo
- Department of Urology, Taipei Veterans General Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan, ROC
- Department of Urology, School of Medicine, National Yang-Ming University, Taipei, Taiwan, ROC
- Shu-Tien Urological Institute, Taipei, Taiwan, ROC
| | - Howard H H Wu
- Department of Urology, Taipei Veterans General Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan, ROC
- Department of Urology, School of Medicine, National Yang-Ming University, Taipei, Taiwan, ROC
- Shu-Tien Urological Institute, Taipei, Taiwan, ROC
| | - Shing-Hwa Lu
- Department of Urology, Taipei Veterans General Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan, ROC
- Department of Urology, School of Medicine, National Yang-Ming University, Taipei, Taiwan, ROC
- Shu-Tien Urological Institute, Taipei, Taiwan, ROC
| | - Yen-Hwa Chang
- Department of Urology, Taipei Veterans General Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan, ROC
- Department of Urology, School of Medicine, National Yang-Ming University, Taipei, Taiwan, ROC
- Shu-Tien Urological Institute, Taipei, Taiwan, ROC
| | - Alex T L Lin
- Department of Urology, Taipei Veterans General Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan, ROC
- Department of Urology, School of Medicine, National Yang-Ming University, Taipei, Taiwan, ROC
- Shu-Tien Urological Institute, Taipei, Taiwan, ROC
| | - William J S Huang
- Department of Urology, Taipei Veterans General Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan, ROC
- Department of Urology, School of Medicine, National Yang-Ming University, Taipei, Taiwan, ROC
- Shu-Tien Urological Institute, Taipei, Taiwan, ROC
| |
Collapse
|