Association of prostate cancer SLCO gene expression with Gleason grade and alterations following androgen deprivation therapy

Statin Concentration in Prostatic Tissue is Subtype- and Dose-dependent

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate for the first time, comparative serum and prostate tissue concentrations of lipophilic and hydrophilic statins.

METHODS

After reviewing all patients who underwent radical prostatectomy between 1993 and 2019, we selected 80 patients taking atorvastatin (lipophilic) or rosuvastatin (hydrophilic) for cholesterol control and with available banked fresh-frozen tissue from the prostatectomy. Primary endpoint was serum and prostate statin concentration measured by HPLC-mass spectrometry analysis. Serum/prostate statin concentrations were compared between patients on atorvastatin and rosuvastatin, and patients receiving high- and low-dose statin, using the Mann-Whitney U test.

RESULTS

In total, 39 patients were taking atorvastatin and 41 were taking rosuvastatin. Thirty-eight and 42 were taking high- and low-dose statin, respectively. Statin concentration was measurable in the prostatic tissue of 15 patients (38.4%) taking atorvastatin (33.3% high-dose vs 42.8% low-dose) compared to 22 (53.6%) taking rosuvastatin (55% high-dose vs 52.3% low-dose). Median tissue concentration of rosuvastatin was greater than atorvastatin (3.98 ng/g vs 0.96 ng/g, P <.001). Dose-dependency was observed: median prostate concentration was higher in those taking high-dose versus low-dose statin for both atorvastatin (1.22 ng/g vs 0.79 ng/g, P = .69) and rosuvastatin (5.21 ng/g vs 1.99 ng/g, P <.001).

CONCLUSION

We have shown, for the first time, that lipophilic and hydrophilic statins can be measured in the prostate of patients with prostate cancer and that the concentrations are dependent on dose. Moreover, rosuvastatin, a hydrophilic statin, achieves a 4-fold higher concentration in the prostate.

18β-Glycyrrhetinic acid synergizes with enzalutamide to counteract castration-resistant prostate cancer by inhibiting OATP2B1 uptake of dehydroepiandrosterone sulfate

Androgen dependence is a key feature of prostate cancer, and androgen deprivation is effective in treating prostate cancer. However, the disease often worsens and develops into castration-resistant prostate cancer after short-term control. The current study aimed to explore the mechanism of the synergistic action of 18β-glycyrrhetinic acid (18β-GA) and enzalutamide (ENZ) against prostate cancer. Our findings showed that 18β-GA significantly inhibited the expression of OATP2B1 and the transport of dehydroepiandrosterone sulfate (DHEAS) in LNCap and 22RV1 cells. It also downregulated the expression of androgen receptor (AR) to some extent. ENZ strongly inhibited AR expression, but it did not affect OATP2B1-mediated uptake of DHEAS. Compared to the effects of 18β-GA and ENZ alone, the combination of 18β-GA and ENZ significantly enhanced the inhibitory effects on AR, prostate-specific antigen (PSA) expression, tumor cell proliferation, and migration. The results obtained in castrated model mice matched the findings of in vitro experiments. 18β-GA significantly reduced the uptake of DHEAS mediated by OATP2B1 in mouse tumor tissues and cooperated with ENZ to further inhibit the expression of AR and PSA, combat the growth of tumor cells, and promote the apoptosis of tumor cells. In conclusion, 18β-GA considerably decreased the uptake of DHEAS and androgen production in cells by inhibiting the transport function of OATP2B1, while ENZ inhibited the nuclear translocation of AR and reduced the expression of AR. The combination of 18β-GA and ENZ can simultaneously inhibit androgen production and AR expression and exhibit a synergistic effect against castration and prostate cancer progression.

Silver Nanoparticles (AgNPs) Uptake by Caveolae-Dependent Endocytosis is Responsible for Their Selective Effect Towards Castration Resistant Prostate Cancer

Purpose

Castration Resistant Prostate Cancer (CRPC) is characterized by poor prognosis and limited therapeutic options. AgNPs functionalized with glucose (G-AgNPs) were observed cytotoxic to CRPC cell lines (PC-3 and Du-145) and not LNCaP. This study aims to evaluate AgNPs and G-AgNPs' uptake mechanisms in these cells and understand their role in the selective effect against CRPC cells.

Methods

Uptake of AgNPs and G-AgNPs was assessed through transmission electron microscopy (TEM). A microRNA (miRNAs) analysis approach was used to uncover the main molecular differences responsible for the endocytic mechanisms' regulation. Caveolin (Cav) 1 and 2 mRNA and protein levels were assessed in the three cell lines. Caveolae-dependent endocytosis was inhibited with genistein or siCav1- and siCav2- in PC-3 and Du-145 and resazurin assay was used to evaluate viability after AgNPs and G-AgNPs administration. Caveolae-dependent endocytosis was induced with Cav1+ and Cav2+ plasmids in LNCaP, resazurin assay was used to evaluate viability after AgNPs and G-AgNPs administration and TEM to assess their location.

Results

AgNPs and G-AgNPs were not uptaked by LNCaP. miRNA analysis revealed 37 upregulated and 90 downregulated miRNAs. Functional enrichment analysis of miRNAs' targets resulted in enrichment of terms related to endocytosis and caveolae. We observed that Cav1 and Cav2 are not expressed in LNCaP. Inhibiting caveolae-dependent endocytosis in Du-145 and PC-3 led to a significative reduction of cytotoxic capacity of AgNPs and G-AgNPs and induction of caveolae-dependent endocytosis in LNCaP lead to a significative increase as well as their uptake by cells.

Conclusion

This study shows the potential of these AgNPs as a new therapeutic approach directed to CRPC patients, uncovers caveolae-dependent endocytosis as the uptake mechanism of these AgNPs and highlights deregulation of Cav1 and Cav2 expression as a key difference in hormone sensitive and resistant PCa cells which may be responsible for drug resistance.

Darolutamide does not interfere with OATP-mediated uptake of docetaxel

The addition of darolutamide, an androgen receptor signalling inhibitor, to therapy with docetaxel has recently been approved as a strategy to treat metastatic prostate cancer. OATP1B3 is an SLC transporter that is highly expressed in prostate cancer and is responsible for the accumulation of substrates, including docetaxel, into tumours. Given that darolutamide inhibits OATP1B3 in vitro, we sought to characterise the impact of darolutamide on docetaxel pharmacokinetics. We investigated the influence of darolutamide on OATP1B3 transport using in vitro and in vivo models. We assessed the impact of darolutamide on the tumour accumulation of docetaxel in a patient-derived xenograft (PDX) model and on an OATP1B biomarker in patients. Darolutamide inhibited OATP1B3 in vitro at concentrations higher than the reported Cmax. Consistent with these findings, in vivo studies revealed that darolutamide does not influence the pharmacokinetics of Oatp1b substrates, including docetaxel. Docetaxel accumulation in PDX tumours was not decreased in the presence of darolutamide. Metastatic prostate cancer patients had similar levels of OATP1B biomarkers, regardless of treatment with darolutamide. Consistent with a low potential to inhibit OATP1B3-mediated transport in vitro, darolutamide does not significantly impede the transport of Oatp1b substrates in vivo or in patients. Our findings support combined treatment with docetaxel and darolutamide, as no OATP1B3 transporter based drug-drug interaction was identified.

SLCO1B3 and SLCO2B1 genotypes, androgen deprivation therapy, and prostate cancer outcomes: a prospective cohort study and meta-analysis

Solute carrier organic anion (SLCO) transporters (OATP transporters) are involved in cellular uptake of drugs and hormones. Germline variants in SLCO1B3 and SLCO2B1 have been implicated in prostate cancer progression and therapy response, including to androgen deprivation and statin medications, but results have appeared heterogeneous. We conducted a cohort study of five single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) in SLCO1B3 and SLCO2B1 with prior evidence among 3208 men with prostate cancer who participated in the Health Professionals Follow-up Study or the Physicians' Health Study, following participants prospectively after diagnosis over 32 years (median, 14 years) for development of metastases and cancer-specific death (lethal disease, 382 events). Results were suggestive of, but not conclusive for, associations between some SNPs and lethal disease and differences by androgen deprivation and statin use. All candidate SNPs were associated with SLCO mRNA expression in tumor-adjacent prostate tissue. We also conducted a systematic review and harmonized estimates for a dose-response meta-analysis of all available data, including 9 further studies, for a total of 5598 patients and 1473 clinical events. The A allele of the exonic SNP rs12422149 (14% prevalence), which leads to lower cellular testosterone precursor uptake via SLCO2B1, was associated with lower rates of prostate cancer progression (hazard ratio per A allele, 0.80; 95% confidence interval, 0.69-0.93), with little heterogeneity between studies (I2, 0.27). Collectively, the totality of evidence suggests a strong association between inherited genetic variation in SLCO2B1 and prostate cancer prognosis, with potential clinical use in risk stratification related to androgen deprivation therapy.

Placenta-Specific Transcripts Containing Androgen Response Elements Are Altered In Silico by Male Growth Outcomes

A birthweight centile (BWC) below the 25th is associated with an elevated risk of adverse perinatal outcomes, particularly among males. This male vulnerability may stem from alterations in placenta-specific androgen signalling, a signalling axis that involves the androgen receptor (AR)-mediated regulation of target genes containing androgen response elements (AREs). In this study, we examined global and ARE-specific transcriptomic signatures in term male placentae (≥37 weeks of gestation) across BWC subcategories (<10th, 10th-30th, >30th) using RNA-seq and gene set enrichment analysis. ARE-containing transcripts in placentae with BWCs below the 10th percentile were upregulated compared to those in the 10th-30th and >30th percentiles, which coincided with the enrichment of gene sets related to hypoxia and the suppression of gene sets associated with mitochondrial function. In the absence of ARE-containing transcripts in silico, <10th and 10th-30th BWC subcategory placentae upregulated gene sets involved in vasculature development, immune function, and cell adhesion when compared to those in the >30th BWC subcategory. Collectively, our in silico findings suggest that changes in the expression of ARE-containing transcripts in male placentae may contribute to impaired placental vasculature and therefore result in reduced fetal growth outcomes.

Understanding and targeting resistance mechanisms in cancer

Resistance to cancer therapies has been a commonly observed phenomenon in clinical practice, which is one of the major causes of treatment failure and poor patient survival. The reduced responsiveness of cancer cells is a multifaceted phenomenon that can arise from genetic, epigenetic, and microenvironmental factors. Various mechanisms have been discovered and extensively studied, including drug inactivation, reduced intracellular drug accumulation by reduced uptake or increased efflux, drug target alteration, activation of compensatory pathways for cell survival, regulation of DNA repair and cell death, tumor plasticity, and the regulation from tumor microenvironments (TMEs). To overcome cancer resistance, a variety of strategies have been proposed, which are designed to enhance the effectiveness of cancer treatment or reduce drug resistance. These include identifying biomarkers that can predict drug response and resistance, identifying new targets, developing new targeted drugs, combination therapies targeting multiple signaling pathways, and modulating the TME. The present article focuses on the different mechanisms of drug resistance in cancer and the corresponding tackling approaches with recent updates. Perspectives on polytherapy targeting multiple resistance mechanisms, novel nanoparticle delivery systems, and advanced drug design tools for overcoming resistance are also reviewed.

Gene polymorphism-related differences in the outcomes of abiraterone for prostate cancer: a systematic overview

Numerous prostate cancer (PC) associated genes have been reported in previous genome-wide association studies. Elucidation of prostate cancer pharmacogenomics have enhanced studies into the impact of germline genetic changes on treatment, in addition to evaluating related genomic alterations and biomarkers in prostate tumor tissues. Currently, Abiraterone (Abi) is used as one of the therapeutic options for PC. In this article, germline variants that have been associated with responses to Abi in patients with advanced PC are summarized. These include biomarker genes such as CYP17A1, AR-V7, HSD3B1, SLCO2B1, SULT1E1, and SRD5A2 that are involved in homologous recombination, as well as in gene expression mutations in important signaling pathways, such as WNT and Abi metabolic pathways.

Androgen receptor signalling impairs docetaxel efficacy in castration-resistant prostate cancer

Androgen receptor (AR) signalling drives neoplastic growth and therapy resistance in prostate cancer. Recent clinical data show that docetaxel combined with androgen deprivation therapy improves outcome in hormone-sensitive disease. We studied whether testosterone and AR signalling interferes with docetaxel treatment efficacy in castration-resistant prostate cancer (CRPC). We found that testosterone supplementation significantly impaired docetaxel tumour accumulation in a CRPC model, resulting in decreased tubulin stabilisation and antitumour activity. Furthermore, testosterone competed with docetaxel for uptake by the drug transporter OATP1B3. Irrespective of docetaxel-induced tubulin stabilisation, AR signalling by testosterone counteracted docetaxel efficacy. AR-pathway activation could also reverse long-term tumour regression by docetaxel treatment in vivo. These results indicate that to optimise docetaxel efficacy, androgen levels and AR signalling need to be suppressed. This study lends evidence for continued maximum suppression of AR signalling by combining targeted therapeutics with docetaxel in CRPC.

Adenomatous polyposis coli-binding protein end-binding 1 promotes hepatocellular carcinoma growth and metastasis

This study was performed to determine the clinical significance of adenomatous polyposis coli (APC)-binding protein end-binding 1 (EB1) in hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) and to characterize its biochemical role in comparison with previous reports. We performed immunohistochemical staining to detect EB1 expression in tissues from 235 patients with HCC and investigated its correlations with clinicopathological features and prognosis. We also investigated the roles of EB1 in cell proliferation, migration, and tumorigenesis in vitro and in vivo by siRNA- and CRISPR/Cas9-mediated modulation of EB1 expression in human HCC cell lines. The results showed that EB1 expression was significantly correlated with several important factors associated with tumor malignancy, including histological differentiation, portal vein invasion status, and intrahepatic metastasis. Patients with high EB1 expression in HCC tissue had poorer overall survival and higher recurrence rates than patients with low EB1 expression. EB1 knockdown and knockout in HCC cells reduced cell proliferation, migration, and invasion in vitro and inhibited tumor growth in vivo. Further, genes encoding Dlk1, HAMP, and SLCO1B3 that were differentially expressed in association with EB1 were identified using RNA microarray analysis. In conclusion, elevated expression of EB1 promotes tumor growth and metastasis of HCC. EB1 may serve as a new biomarker for HCC, and genes coexpressed with EB1 may represent potential targets for therapy.

Molecular mechanisms of docetaxel resistance in prostate cancer

Docetaxel (DTX) chemotherapy offers excellent initial response and confers significant survival benefit in patients with castration-resistant prostate cancer (CRPC). However, the clinical utility of DTX is compromised when primary and acquired resistance are encountered. Therefore, a more thorough understanding of DTX resistance mechanisms may potentially improve survival in patients with CRPC. This review focuses on DTX and discusses its mechanisms of resistance. We outline the involvement of tubulin alterations, androgen receptor (AR) signaling/AR variants, ERG rearrangements, drug efflux/influx, cancer stem cells, centrosome clustering, and phosphoinositide 3-kinase/AKT signaling in mediating DTX resistance. Furthermore, potential biomarkers for DTX treatment and therapeutic strategies to circumvent DTX resistance are reviewed.

Early upregulation of AR and steroidogenesis enzyme expression after 3 months of androgen-deprivation therapy

Background

Androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) is a standard treatment for advanced prostate cancer (PCa). However, PCa recurrence and progression rates during ADT are high. Until now, there has been no evidence regarding when progression begins. This study evaluated the gene expression of intraprostatic androgen receptor (AR) and steroidogenic enzymes in the early stages of ADT.

Methods

Prostate tissue samples were taken from PCa patients with urinary retention who received ADT (ADT-PCa; n = 10) and were further subgrouped into ADT ≤12 months (n = 4) and ADT > 12 months (n = 6). The ADT-PCa tissues were then compared with BPH (n = 12) and primary (no treatment) PCa tissues (n = 16). mRNA for gene expression analysis of AR and steroidogenic enzymes was extracted from formalin-fixed paraffin embedded (FFPE) tissues and analyzed by real-time PCR. Protein expression was evaluated by immunohistochemistry with specific antibodies.

Results

AR gene expression was higher in the ADT-PCa group than in the BPH or primary PCa group. Both the ADT ≤12 and > 12 months subgroups had significantly higher relative gene expression levels of AR (p < 0.01 and 0.03, respectively) than the primary PCa group. In the ADT-PCa group, AR protein expression showed an increasing trend in the ADT ≤12 months subgroup and was significantly elevated in the ADT > 12 months subgroup compared with the PCa group (100%; p < 0.01). Half (50%) of the patients in the ADT ≤12 months subgroup were found to have upregulation of AR, and one showed upregulation beginning at 3 months of ADT. A trend toward elevated relative gene expression of SRD5A3 was also apparent in the ADT groups.

Conclusion

AR and steroidogenic enzymes are upregulated in ADT-PCa patients as early as 3 months, without PSA elevation. Steroidogenic enzymes, particularly SRD5A3, were also upregulated before PSA rose.

The Emerging Role of the SLCO1B3 Protein in Cancer Resistance

Currently, chemotherapy is one of the mainstays of oncologic therapies. But the efficacy of chemotherapy is often limited by drug resistance and severe side effects. Consequently, it is becoming increasingly important to investigate the underlying mechanism and overcome the problem of anticancer chemotherapy resistance. The solute carrier organic anion transporter family member 1B3 (SLCO1B3), a functional transporter normally expressed in the liver, transports a variety of endogenous and exogenous compounds, including hormones and their conjugates as well as some anticancer drugs. The extrahepatic expression of SLCO1B3 has been detected in different cancer cell lines and cancer tissues. Recently, accumulating data indicates that the abnormal expression and function of SLCO1B3 are involved in resistance to anticancer drugs, such as taxanes, camptothecin and its analogs, SN-38, and Androgen Deprivation Therapy (ADT) in breast, prostate, lung, hepatic, and colorectal cancer, respectively. Thus, more investigations have been implemented to identify the potential SLCO1B3-related mechanisms of cancer drug resistance. In this review, we focus on the emerging roles of SLCO1B3 protein in the development of cancer chemotherapy resistance and briefly discuss the mechanisms of resistance. Elucidating the function of SLCO1B3 in chemoresistance may bring out novel therapeutic strategies for cancer treatment.

Lipogenic effects of androgen signaling in normal and malignant prostate

Prostate cancer is an androgen-dependent cancer with unique metabolic features compared to many other solid tumors, and typically does not exhibit the “Warburg effect”. During malignant transformation, an early metabolic switch diverts the dependence of normal prostate cells on aerobic glycolysis for the synthesis of and secretion of citrate towards a more energetically favorable metabolic phenotype, whereby citrate is actively oxidised for energy and biosynthetic processes (i.e. de novo lipogenesis). It is now clear that lipid metabolism is one of the key androgen-regulated processes in prostate cells and alterations in lipid metabolism are a hallmark of prostate cancer, whereby increased de novo lipogenesis accompanied by overexpression of lipid metabolic genes are characteristic of primary and advanced disease. Despite recent advances in our understanding of altered lipid metabolism in prostate tumorigenesis and cancer progression, the intermediary metabolism of the normal prostate and its relationship to androgen signaling remains poorly understood. In this review, we discuss the fundamental metabolic relationships that are distinctive in normal versus malignant prostate tissues, and the role of androgens in the regulation of lipid metabolism at different stages of prostate tumorigenesis.