Diagnostic performance of 18F-PSMA-1007 PET/CT in biochemically relapsed patients with prostate cancer with PSA levels ≤ 2.0 ng/ml

The superior detection rate of total-body [68Ga]Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT compared to short axial field-of-view [68Ga]Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT for early recurrent prostate cancer patients with PSA < 0.2 ng/mL after radical prostatectomy

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

[68Ga]Ga-PSMA PET imaging has been extensively utilized for the detection of biochemical recurrence (BCR) in prostate cancer. However, the detection rate declines to merely 10-40% when PSA levels are < 0.2 ng/mL employing short axial field-of-view (SAFOV) PET. Prior studies exhibited superior detection rates with total-body [68Ga]Ga-PSMA-11 PET compared to SAFOV [68Ga]Ga-PSMA-11 PET in BCR patients with PSA > 0.2 ng/mL. Nevertheless, the diagnostic utility of total-body [68Ga]Ga-PSMA-11 PET for BCR patients when PSA is < 0.2 ng/mL remains unclear. This study aimed to assess whether total-body [68Ga]Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT could improve the detection rate compared to SAFOV [68Ga]Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT in BCR patients with PSA < 0.2 ng/mL.

METHODS

Eighty BCR patients with PSA < 0.2 ng/mL underwent total-body [68Ga]Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT. These patients were matched by baseline qualities to another 80 patients who received SAFOV [68Ga]Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT. The detection rates of total-body [68Ga]Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT and SAFOV [68Ga]Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT were compared utilizing a chi-square test and stratified analysis. Image quality of total-body [68Ga]Ga-PSMA PET/CT and SAFOV [68Ga]Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT was assessed based on subjective scoring and objective parameters. The objective parameters measured were SUVmax, SUVmean, standard deviation (SD) of SUV, and signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) of liver and gluteus maximus.

RESULTS

The image quality of total-body [68Ga]Ga-PSMA PET/CT was superior to that of SAFOV [68Ga]Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT in both early and delayed scans. The detection rate of total-body [68Ga]Ga-PSMA PET/CT for BCR patients with PSA < 0.2 ng/mL was significantly higher than that of SAFOV [68Ga]Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT (73.75% vs. 43.75%, P < 0.001). Total-body [68Ga]Ga-PSMA PET/CT resulted in noteworthy modifications to the treatment regimen when contrasted with SAFOV [68Ga]Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT.

CONCLUSIONS

In BCR patients with PSA < 0.2 ng/mL, total-body [68Ga]Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT not only demonstrated a significantly higher detection rate compared to SAFOV [68Ga]Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT but also led to significant alterations in treatment regimens.

Diagnostic Accuracy of 18F-Prostate Specific Membrane Antigen (PSMA) PET/CT Radiotracers in Staging and Restaging of Patients With High-Risk Prostate Cancer or Biochemical Recurrence: An Overview of Reviews

The aim of this overview was to consolidate existing evidence syntheses and provide a comprehensive overview of the evidence for 18F-prostate specific membrane antigen (PSMA) PET/CT in the staging of high-risk prostate cancer and restaging after biochemical recurrence. An overview of reviews was performed and reported in line with the preferred reporting items for overview of reviews (PRIOR) statement and synthesis without meta-analysis (SWiM) reporting guidelines. A comprehensive database and grey literature search were conducted up to July 18, 2023. Systematic reviews were assessed using the risk of bias in systematic reviews (ROBIS) tool. The certainty of the evidence was assessed using grading of recommendations, assessment, development and evaluations (GRADE). 11 systematic reviews were identified; 10 were at high or unclear risk of bias. Evidence reported on a per-patient, per-lymph node, and per-lesion basis for sensitivity, specificity and overall accuracy was identified. There was a lack of data on dose, adverse events and evidence directly comparing 18F-PSMA PET/CT to other imaging modalities. Evidence with moderate to very low certainty indicated high sensitivity, specificity and accuracy of 18F-PSMA PET/CT in patients with high-risk prostate cancer and biochemical recurrence. There was considerably lower certainty evidence and greater variability in effect estimates for outcomes for the combined intermediate/high-risk cohort. While evidence gaps remain for some outcomes, and most systematic reviews were at high or unclear risk of bias, the current evidence base is broadly supportive of 18F-PSMA PET/CT imaging in the staging and restaging of patients with high-risk prostate cancer and biochemical recurrence.

Detection Rate of PSMA PET Using Different Ligands in Men with Biochemical Recurrent Prostate Cancer Following Radical Treatment: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Prospective Studies

BACKGROUND

Despite the acknowledged diagnostic detection rate of prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) positron emission tomography (PET) imaging in prostate cancer, little is known about the quality of evidence, particularly focusing on prospective studies. Most systematic reviews are based on retrospective reports.

RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVES

To conduct systematic review and meta-analysis of prospective studies reporting the diagnostic detection rate of PSMA PET (computed tomography (CT) and MR) for the detection of biochemically recurrent metastatic prostate cancer.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We systematically searched PubMed, MEDLINE, Embase, and Scopus, from database until March 1, 2023 for randomized controlled trials and prospective studies using PSMA PET imaging in prostate cancer. The primary endpoint was to assess diagnostic detection rate of PSMA PET imaging in the detection of recurrent prostate cancer in men with biochemical relapse following radical treatment. We calculated the pooled overall diagnostic detection rate with 95% CI using a random-effects model and assessed the heterogeneity between the studies including risk of biases estimation.

RESULTS

A total of 6800 patients from 32 articles were included in this study. The overall detection rate of PSMA PET for prostate cancer was 0.67 (95% CI, 0.63, 0.71). For histologically confirmed lymph nodes, the PPV from 13 prospective studies containing 1496 patients was 0.96 (95% CI, 0.93, 0.99). We performed a subgroup analysis of PSMA PET detection rates according to categorically grouped Prostate Specific Antigen (PSA) values of 0-0.5, 0.5-1.0, 1.0-2.0, and >2.0 ng/ml and obtained detection rates of 0.44, 0.63, 0.82, and 0.94, respectively. The detection rate of 18F PSMA was better in men with a PSA between 1 ng/ml and 2 ng/ml in comparison to 68Ga PSMA (0.91 with 95% CI 0.81-0.99 vs. 0.79 with 95% CI 0.73, 0.85).

CONCLUSION

PSMA PET imaging provides a good detection rate for the metastatic recurrence of prostate cancer in men with biochemical relapse following radical treatment. The detection rate improves significantly above a serum PSA value of 1 ng/ml. The diagnostic detection rate of 18F-PSMA is best at PSA values between 1 and 2 ng/ml, in comparison to 68Ga PSMA. This conclusion is heavily biased, further research needs to focus on better methodology to minimize the risk of biases.

Diagnostic performance of 18F-labeled PSMA PET/CT in patients with biochemical recurrence of prostate cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

After initial treatment of prostate cancer, increases in prostate-specific antigen (PSA) levels commonly signify potential relapse or metastasis. 18F-labeled prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) is considered a promising treatment due to its favorable physical properties.

PURPOSE

To investigate the diagnostic value of 18F-PSMA PET/CT for the recurrence and/or metastasis of biochemical recurrence of prostate cancer (BRPca).

MATERIAL AND METHODS

A comprehensive literature search was conducted in PubMed, EMBASE, Web of Science, and the Cochrane Library databases. Combined sensitivity and specificity values for the use of 18F-PSMA PET/CT in patients with BRPca were obtained. The quality of the studies was tested using the Diagnostic Accuracy Research Quality Assessment tool. Meta-analysis was performed using STATA 15 software, and heterogeneity was subsequently tested.

RESULTS

A total of 16 studies (1162 patients) were enrolled and had significant heterogeneity. The pooled sensitivity, specificity, and AUC values for 18F-PSMA PET/CT in the diagnosis of prostate recurrence and/or metastasis were 0.93 (0.89-0.95), 0.94 (0.85-0.98), and 0.96 (0,94-0.98), respectively. Meta-regression analyses showed that the sources of heterogeneity did not relate to ligands, study designs, or participants. The pooled sensitivity and specificity values of 18F-DCFPyL PET/CT were 0.90 (0.85-0.94) and 0.89 (0.85-0.93), respectively. The pooled sensitivity and specificity values of 18F-PSMA-1007 PET/CT were 0.89 (0.85-0.93) and 0.93 (0.70-0.99), respectively. The per-patient pooled sensitivity and specificity values were 0.92 (0.86-0.96) and 0.83 (0.41-0.97), respectively. The per-lesion pooled sensitivity and specificity values were 0.91 (0.86-0.94) and 0.91 (0.86-0.94), respectively.

CONCLUSION

According to our meta-analysis, 18F-PSMA PET/CT has the potential to be critical for the diagnosis of recurrence and/or metastasis in patients with BRPca.

Comparison of 18 F-PSMA-1007 PET/CT With 68 Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT for Initial Staging in Intermediate- and High-Risk Prostate Cancer

PURPOSE

This study aimed to compare 18 F-PSMA-1007 PET/CT with 68 Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT for initial staging in intermediate- and high-risk prostate cancer (PCa) patients.

METHODS

Forty treatment-naive, biopsy-proven, intermediate- or high-risk PCa patients were prospectively recruited. Each patient underwent PET/CT with 68 Ga-PSMA-11 and 18 F-PSMA-1007 (within 2 weeks). Assessment of both set of images included delineating number and characteristics of lesions, measurement of tracer uptake (SUV max ), miPSMA scoring, and PET-based stage categorization.

RESULTS

Intraprostatic lesions were detected in all patients by both tracers with concordant PET-based T stage. Median SUV max of the dominant PSMA-positive prostatic lesions was not significantly different with 18 F-PSMA-1007 and 68 Ga-PSMA-11 (19.9 vs 19.4, P = 0.127, n = 40). Prostatic miPSMA scores were similar in 31/40 (77.5%) patients with both tracers (weighted κ = 0.71). In 23/40 (57.5%) patients, regional lymph nodes (n = 171) were detected by both tracers. Few additional PET-positive regional lymph nodes (n = 3) were exclusively detected by 18 F-PSMA in 2 patients without altering PET-based N stage. Extraregional lymph nodes (n = 123 in 17/40 patients) and visceral metastatic lesions (n = 18 in 3/40 patients) were detected concordantly by both tracers. PET-positive marrow based and skeletal metastases (n = 71) were detected in 14/40 (35%) patients by both tracers. Few additional marrow and skeletal lesions (n = 7) were exclusively detected on 18 F-PSMA-1007 in 5/14 patients, potentially upstaging PET-based M stage in 2/5 patients. Both radiotracers showed excellent interreader agreement for region-wise detection of lesions.

CONCLUSIONS

Our results suggest that 18 F-PSMA-1007 PET/CT is comparable to 68 Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT in detecting primary and metastatic lesions of PCa.

The Detection Performance of 18 F-Prostate-Specific Membrane Antigen-1007 PET/CT in Primary Prostate Cancer : A Systemic Review and Meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Multiple tools are now available to determine the requirement for a biopsy to diagnose prostate cancer, and PET/CT with radiolabeled prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA)-targeting radiotracers has been recommended for detecting primary prostate cancer. Particularly, the radiotracer 18 F-PSMA-1007 was found to be more favorable for primary tumors compared with other PSMA-targeting radiotracers because of its low clearance via the urinary tract and better image resolution. Thus, we performed a systematic review and meta-analysis to more accurately evaluate the detection performance of 18 F-PSMA-1007 PET/CT in primary prostate cancer patients.

METHODS

An update on the databases of PubMed/MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Cochrane Library for comprehensive literature search was performed on September 30, 2021. The pooling detection rate was calculated on a per-patient basis. The pooling median of the SUV max was analyzed from the included studies. Furthermore, the positive predictive value of 18 F-PSMA-1007 PET/CT with pathologic lesions was analyzed using the criterion standard.

RESULTS

Twelve studies (540 patients total) were included in the meta-analysis. The overall pooling detection rate of 18 F-PSMA-1007 per patient was 94%, and the pooling median of SUV max located at the intraprostate tumor was 16 (range, 3.7-77.7). The positive predictive value of 18 F-PSMA-1007 per lesion with histopathological validation was 0.90, detecting regional lymph node metastasis was 0.94, and detecting localized prostatic tumors was 0.84.

CONCLUSIONS

In the current meta-analysis, we revealed the excellent performance of 18 F-PSMA-1007 to detect localized prostatic tumor lesions and regional lymph node metastasis. Moreover, the uptake of localized tumors in primary prostate cancer was nearly liver uptake and may be considered a suspicious malignancy if it was equal to or greater than the liver uptake.

A randomised, prospective and head-to-head comparison of [68Ga]Ga-PSMA-11 and [18F]PSMA-1007 for the detection of recurrent prostate cancer in PSMA-ligand PET/CT-Protocol design and rationale

Background

A number of radiopharmaceuticals are available for the detection of recurrent prostate cancer (rPC), but few comparative imaging trials have been performed comparing them. In particular, there are no prospective head-to-head comparisons of the recently introduced [¹⁸F]PSMA-1007 to the existing standard of care [⁶⁸Ga]Ga-PSMA-11. The purpose of this trial is to establish the non-inferiority of the new radiopharmaceutical in terms of the rate of PET-positive findings and to obtain an intra-individual comparison of accuracy and radiopharmaceutical kinetics.

Methods

In this cross-over trial we will randomise 100 individuals to receive either first a standard-of-care PET/CT using [⁶⁸Ga]Ga-PSMA-11 followed by an additional [¹⁸F]PSMA-1007 PET/CT within 2 weeks, or vice-versa. Inclusion criteria include patients 18 years and older with biochemical recurrence of prostate cancer following radical prostatectomy, defined as two consecutive prostate specific antigen (PSA) levels > 0.2 ng/ml. Detection rate at the patient-based level is the primary end-point. Each scan will be interpreted by a panel of six independent and masked readers (three for [⁶⁸Ga]Ga-PSMA-11 and three for [¹⁸F]PSMA-1007) which consensus majority in cases of discrepancy. To confirm the PET-positivity rate at a patient based level, follow up at 6 months following the first scan will be performed to a composite standard of truth. Secondary endpoints shall include an intra-individual comparison of radiopharmaceutical-kinetics, per-region detection rate and positive predictive value.

Discussion

This is the first randomised prospective comparative imaging trial to compare the established [⁶⁸Ga]Ga-PSMA-11 with [¹⁸F]PSMA-1007 and will determine whether the new radiopharmaceutical is non-inferior to the established standard-of-care in terms of patient-level detection rate.

Clinical trial registration

Registered with and approved by the regional ethics authority #2020–02903 (submitted 09.12.2020, approval 16.12.2021) and the regulatory authority SwissMedic 2020DR2103. Registered with ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier NCT05079828 and additionally in a national language in the Swiss National Clinical Trials Portal (SNCTP).

Diagnostic accuracy of [18F]PSMA-1007 PET/CT in biochemical recurrence of prostate cancer

AIM

Despite increasing use for the detection of biochemically recurrent prostate cancer (rPC), the diagnostic accuracy of positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) with [18F]PSMA-1007 remains only partially investigated. The aim of this study was to determine the sensitivity (SE), specificity (SP), positive predictive value (PPV), and negative predictive value (NPV) for PC-local recurrence and metastases on a per region basis.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

One hundred seventy-seven consecutive patients undergoing [18F]PSMA-1007 PET/CT for rPC were retrospectively analysed. Six body regions were defined: prostate fossa, pelvic lymph nodes (LN), retroperitoneal LN, supradiaphragmatic LN, bones, and soft tissue. A region was counted positive if at least one PSMA-positive lesion suspicious for PC was observed. Confirmation of a true-positive PSMA-avid lesion was defined as positive by histopathology, fall in serum prostate-specific antigen (PSA) (> 50%) after targeted therapy or confirmatory further CT, MRI, PET/CT, or bone scan imaging. Regions where additional imaging was able to confirm the absence of suspicious PC lesions or regions outside exclusively targeted RT with serum PSA decline (> 50%) were counted as true-negative regions. SE, SP, PPV, and NPV were calculated for all six regions.

RESULTS

The overall PET-positivity rate was 91%. Conclusive follow-up for affirmation or refutation of a PSMA-positive lesion was available for 81/152 patients on a per region basis. In this subgroup, overall sensitivity, specificity, PPV, and NPV were 95% (CI: 0.90-0.98), 89% (CI: 0.83-0.93), 86% (0.80-0.90), and 96% (CI: 0.92-0.98), respectively. On a per region basis, PPV was 97% (CI: 0.83-0.99) for local recurrence, 93% (CI: 0.78-0.98) for pelvic LN, 87% (CI: 0.62-0.96) for retroperitoneal LN, 82% (CI: 0.52-0.95) for supradiaphragmatic LN, and 79% (0.65-0.89) for bone lesions. The number of solid organ metastases (n = 6) was too small for an accurate statistical analysis.

CONCLUSION

The known high PET-positivity rate of [18F]PSMA-1007 PET/CT in rPC was confirmed, with corresponding high (> 90%) sensitivity and NPV on a per region basis. However, overall PPV was limited (86%), particularly for bone lesions (79%), which are a potential diagnostic weaknesses when using this tracer.

Assessment of malignancy and PSMA expression of uncertain bone foci in [18F]PSMA-1007 PET/CT for prostate cancer-a single-centre experience of PET-guided biopsies

Purpose

Uncertain focal bone uptake (UBU) with intensive radiopharmaceutical avidity are frequently observed in patients undergoing [¹⁸F]PSMA-1007 PET/CT for the detection of prostate cancer (PC). Such foci can pose diagnostic conundrums and risk incorrect staging. The aim of this short communication is to share the results of PET-guided biopsies of such foci.

Methods

A retrospective analysis revealed 10 patients who were referred to our department for PET-guided biopsy of UBU visible in a previous [¹⁸F]PSMA-1007 PET/CT. [¹⁸F]-PSMA-1007 PET-guided biopsy was conducted for 11 PSMA-avid bone foci in these 10 patients. The biopsy materials were analysed for tissue typing, and immunohistochemistry (IHC) was performed for prostate-specific-membrane-antigen (PSMA) expression. The scans were analysed by two experienced physicians in a consensus read for clinical characteristics and radiopharmaceutical uptake of foci.

Results

One out of 11 (9.1%) of the foci biopsied was confirmed as bone metastasis of PC with intense PSMA-expression, while 10/11 (90.9%) foci were revealed to be unremarkable bone tissue without evidence of PSMA expression at IHC. Amongst all bone foci assessed by biopsy, eight were visually classified as being at high risk of malignancy in the PET/CT (SUVmean 12.0 ± 8.1; SUVmax 18.8 ± 13.1), three as equivocal (SUVmean 4.6 ± 2.1; SUVmax 7.2 ± 3.0) and zero as low risk. No UBU had any CT correlate.

Conclusions

This cohort biopsy revealed that a small but relevant number of UBU are true metastases. For those confirmed as benign, no PSMA expression at IHC was observed, suggesting a non-PSMA mediated cause for intensive [¹⁸F]PSMA-1007 uptake of which the reason remains unclear. Readers must interpret such foci with caution in order to reduce the risk of erroneous staging and subsequent treatment. PET-guided biopsy, particularly in the absence of morphological changes in the CT, can be a useful method to clarify such foci.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s00259-022-05745-5.

The Diagnostic Performance of 18F-PSMA-1007 PET/CT in Prostate Cancer Patients with Early Recurrence after Definitive Therapy with a PSA <10 ng/ml

AIM

The prostate bed is one of the common sites of early recurrence of prostate cancer. The currently used PSMA ligands (⁶⁸Ga-PSMA-11 and ^99mTc-PSMA) undergo early urinary clearance resulting in interfering physiological activity within and surrounding the prostate. This can result in sites of cancer recurrence being obscured. ¹⁸F-PSMA-1007 has an advantage of delayed urinary clearance thus the prostate region is reviewed without any interfering physiological activity. The aim of this study was to determine the diagnostic performance of ¹⁸F-PSMA-1007 PET/CT in patients with early biochemical recurrence after definitive therapy.

METHODS

Forty-six Prostate cancer (mean age 66.7±7.5, range 48-87 years) presenting with biochemical recurrence (median PSA 1.6ng/ml, range 0.1-10.0) underwent non-contrast-enhanced ¹⁸F-PSMA-1007 PET/CT. PET/CT findings were evaluated qualitatively and semiquantitatively (SUVmax) and compared to the results of histology, Gleason grade, and conventional imaging.

RESULTS

Twenty-four of the 46 (52.2%) patients demonstrated a site of recurrence on ¹⁸F-PSMA-1007 PET/CT. Oligometastatic disease was detected in 15 (32.6%) of these patients. Of these 10 (37.5%) demonstrated intra-prostatic recurrence, lymph node disease was noted in 11 (45.8%) whilst two patients demonstrated skeletal metastases. The detection rates for PSA levels 0-<0.5, 0.5-<1, 1-2, >2 were 31.3%, 33.3%, 55.6% and 72.2% respectively. 7 (29.2%) of the positive patients had been described as negative or equivocal on conventional imaging. An optimal PSA cut-off level of 1.3ng/ml was found.

CONCLUSION

¹⁸F-PSMA-1007 demonstrated good diagnostic performance detecting sites of recurrence. Its ability to detect sites of recurrence in the setting of early biochemical recurrence will have a significant impact on patient management.

Comparison of [18F]PSMA-1007 with [68Ga]Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT in Restaging of Prostate Cancer Patients with PSA Relapse

This study aimed to compare the diagnostic performance of [18F]PSMA-1007 positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) (18F-PSMA) and [68Ga]Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT (68Ga-PSMA) by identifying prostate-specific antigen (PSA) threshold levels for optimal detecting recurrent prostate cancer (PC) and to compare both methods. Retrospectively, the study included 264 patients. The performances of 18F-PSMA and 68Ga-PSMA in relation to the pre-scan PSA were assessed by receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve. 18F-PSMA showed PC-lesions in 87.5% (112/128 patients), while 68Ga-PSMA identified them in 88.9% (121/136). For 18F-PSMA biochemical recurrent (BCR) patients treated with radical prostatectomy (78/128, patient group: F-RP), a PSA of 1.08 ng/mL was found to be the optimal cut-off level for predicting positive and negative scans (AUC = 0.821; 95%, CI: 0.710−0.932), while for prostatectomized 68Ga-PSMA BCR-patients (89/136, patient group: Ga-RP), the cut-off was 1.84 ng/mL (AUC = 0.588; 95%, CI: 0.410−0.766). In patients with PSA < 1.08 ng/mL (F-RP) 76.3% and <1.84 ng/mL (Ga-RP) 78.6% scans were positive, whereas patients with PSA ≥ 1.08 ng/mL (F-RP) or 1.84 ng/mL (Ga-RP) had positive scan results in 100% and 91.5% (p < 0.001/p = 0.085). The identified PSA thresholds for PSMA-mappable PC lesions in BCR-patients (RP) showed a better separation for 18F-PSMA with regard to the distinguishing of positive and negative PC-lesions compared to 68Ga-PSMA. However, the two PSMA PET/CT tracers gave similar overall findings.

Development of 18F-Labeled Vinyl Sulfone-PSMAi Conjugates as New PET Agents for Prostate Cancer Imaging

Radiolabeled prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) ligands have been rapidly adopted as part of patient care for prostate cancer. In this study, a new series of ¹⁸F-labeled PSMA-targeting agents was developed based on the high-affinity Glu-ureido-Lys scaffold and ¹⁸F-vinyl sulfones (VSs), the tumor uptake and tumor/major organ contrast of which could be tuned by pharmacokinetic linkers within the molecules. In particular, ¹⁸F-PEG₃-VS-PSMAi showed the highest tumor uptake (12.1 ± 2.2%ID/g at 0.5 h p.i.) and ¹⁸F-PEG₂-VS-PSMAi showed the highest tumor-to-liver ratio (T/L = 3.7 ± 1.0, 4.8 ± 1.2, and 6.3 ± 1.1 at 0.5, 1.5, and 3 h p.i. respectively). Significantly, compared with the FDA-approved ⁶⁸Ga-PSMA-11, the newly developed ¹⁸F-PEG₃-VS-PSMAi has an almost double tumor uptake (P < 0.0001) when tested in the same animal model. In conclusion, ¹⁸F-VS-labeled PSMA ligands are promising PET agents with prominent tumor uptake and high contrast. The lead agents ¹⁸F-PEG₂-VS-PSMAi and ¹⁸F-PEG₃-VS-PSMAi warrant further evaluation in prostate cancer patients.

18F-PSMA-1007 PET in Biochemical Recurrent Prostate Cancer: An Updated Meta-Analysis

Background

Prostate-specific membrane antigen- (PSMA-) targeted agents labeled with fluorine-18 (¹⁸F) have recently become available to evaluate patients with biochemical recurrent prostate cancer (BRPCa) by using positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) or positron emission tomography/magnetic resonance imaging (PET/MRI). We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis about the detection rate (DR) of ¹⁸F-PSMA-1007 PET/CT or PET/MRI in BRPCa patients.

Methods

A comprehensive computer literature search of PubMed/MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Cochrane Library databases for studies published through 17 May 2021 was carried out using the following search algorithm: “PSMA” AND “1007”. Only studies providing data on the DR of ¹⁸F-PSMA-1007 PET/CT or PET/MRI in BRPCa were included. A random-effects model was used to calculate the pooled DR on a per scan basis.

Results

Fifteen articles (853 patients) were selected and included in the systematic review, and ten were included in the quantitative analysis. Most of the studies reported a good DR of ¹⁸F-PSMA-1007 PET/CT or PET/MRI in BRPCa including also patients with low prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSA) values. The DR of ¹⁸F-PSMA-1007 PET/CT or PET/MRI was dependent on PSA serum values. The pooled DR was 81.3% (95% confidence interval: 74.6–88%) with statistical heterogeneity. A significant reporting bias (publication bias) was not detected.

Conclusions

¹⁸F-PSMA-1007 PET/CT or PET/MRI showed a good DR in BRPCa patients in line with other PSMA-targeted agents. The DR of ¹⁸F-PSMA-1007 PET/CT or PET/MRI is influenced by serum PSA values. These findings should be confirmed by prospective multicentric trials.

Preparation of 177Lu-PSMA-617 in Hospital Radiopharmacy: Convenient Formulation of a Clinical Dose Using a Single-Vial Freeze-Dried PSMA-617 Kit Developed In-House

Objective

In the recent time, endoradionuclide therapy for metastatic castration-resistant prostate carcinoma employing ¹⁷⁷Lu-PSMA-617 has yielded encouraging results and several clinical trials with the agent are currently ongoing. Routine preparation of ¹⁷⁷Lu-PSMA-617 patient doses can be made simpler and convenient, if the ingredients essential for radiolabeling are made available in a ready-to-use lyophilized form.

Methods

PSMA-617 freeze-dried kit was formulated and used for the preparation of ¹⁷⁷Lu-PSMA-617 clinical dose with high radiochemical purity using low/medium specific activity ¹⁷⁷Lu. Detailed radiochemical studies were performed to determine the maximum activity and volume of ¹⁷⁷LuCl₃, which can be added in the kit for the formulation of ¹⁷⁷Lu-PSMA-617. Studies were also performed to determine the shelf life of the kit to ensure its long-term usage. Studies were performed in buffer as well as human serum medium to determine the stability of the ¹⁷⁷Lu-PSMA-617 complex after storing in respective media up to 7 days postpreparation. About ten patient doses of ¹⁷⁷Lu-PSMA-617 were administered, and posttherapy scans were acquired.

Results

The formulated freeze-dried kit of PSMA-617 could be radiolabeled with an average percentage radiochemical purity > 98.53 ± 0.38. The freeze-dried kit was found suitable for tolerating up to 0.5 mL of ¹⁷⁷LuCl₃ (in 0.01 N HCl) and specific activity of 555 MBq/μg (15 mCi/μg) for the preparation of the patient dose of ¹⁷⁷Lu-PSMA-617. The ¹⁷⁷Lu-PSMA-617 complex prepared using the freeze-dried kit of PSMA-617 was observed to maintain % radiochemical purity (RCP) of 96.74 ± 0.87 and 94.81 ± 2.66, respectively, even after storing up to 7 days in buffer and human serum, respectively. ¹⁷⁷Lu-PSMA-617 prepared using the in-house formulated freeze-dried kit of PSMA-617 exhibited accumulation in metastatic lesions picked up in a pretherapy PET scan. Reduction in number as well as size of lesions was observed in posttherapy scans acquired after two months of administering the first therapeutic dose of ¹⁷⁷Lu-PSMA-617.

Conclusions

The freeze-dried kit of PSMA-617 could be used for the preparation of ¹⁷⁷Lu-PSMA-617 with high radiochemical purity (>98%) in a reproducible manner. ¹⁷⁷Lu-PSMA-617 prepared using the developed kit was successfully evaluated in patients suffering from metastatic prostate cancer.

Evaluation of 18F-PSMA-1007 PET/CT in prostate cancer patients with biochemical recurrence after radical prostatectomy

PURPOSE

Prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) ligands targeting has shown promising results in staging of prostate cancer (PCa). The aim of present study was to evaluate the value of ¹⁸F-PSMA-1007 PET/CT in PCa patients with biochemical recurrence.

METHODS

71 patients with PCa after radical prostatectomy (RP) were included in the present study. Median prostate-specific antigen (PSA) level was 1.27 ng/mL (range 0.01-67.40 ng/mL, n = 69). All patients underwent whole-body PET/CT imaging after injection of 333±38 MBq ¹⁸F-PSMA-1007. The distribution of PSMA-positive lesions was assessed. The influence of PSA level, androgen deprivation therapy and primary Gleason score on PSMA-positive finding and uptake of ¹⁸F-PSMA-1007 were evaluated.

RESULTS

56 (79%) patients showed at least one pathological finding on ¹⁸F-PSMA-1007 PET/CT. The rates of positive scans were 50%, 80%, 100%, 100% among patients with PSA levels ≤0.5, 0.51-1.0, 1.1-2.0 and >2.0 ng/mL, respectively. The median Gleason score was 8 (range 7-10), and higher Gleason score (≤7 vs. ≥8) leads to higher detection rates (58.3% (14/24) vs. 88.9% (32/36), P = 0.006). The median SUVmax of positive findings in patients with PSA levels ≤0.5, 0.51-1.0, 1.1-2.0 and >2.0 ng/mL were 4.51, 4.27, 11.50 and 14.08, respectively. The median SUVmax in patients with PSA level >2.0 ng/mL was significantly higher than that in patients with PSA ≤2.0 ng/mL (14.08 vs. 6.13, P<0.001).

CONCLUSION

¹⁸F-PSMA-1007 PET/CT demonstrated a high detection rate for patients with a raised PSA level after radical prostatectomy even in patients with extremely low PSA level (eg. PSA level ≤0.5 ng/mL), which was essential for further clinical management for PCa patients.

Novel Tracers and Radionuclides in PET Imaging

The use of PET imaging agents in oncology, cardiovascular disease, and neurodegenerative disease shows the power of this technique in evaluating the molecular and biological characteristics of numerous diseases. These agents provide crucial information for designing therapeutic strategies for individual patients. Novel PET tracers are in continual development and many have potential use in clinical and research settings. This article discusses the potential applications of tracers in diagnostics, the biological characteristics of diseases, the ability to provide prognostic indicators, and using this information to guide treatment strategies including monitoring treatment efficacy in real time to improve outcomes and survival.

The Diagnostic Role of 18F-Choline, 18F-Fluciclovine and 18F-PSMA PET/CT in the Detection of Prostate Cancer With Biochemical Recurrence: A Meta-Analysis

Background

Diagnosing the biochemical recurrence (BCR) of prostate cancer (PCa) is a clinical challenge, and early detection of BCR can help patients receive optimal treatment. We conducted a meta-analysis to define the diagnostic accuracy of PET/CT using ¹⁸F-labeled choline, fluciclovine, and prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) in patients with BCR.

Methods

Multiple databases were searched until March 30, 2021. We included studies investigating the diagnostic accuracy of ¹⁸F-choline, ¹⁸F-fluciclovine, and ¹⁸F-PSMA PET/CT in patients with BCR. The pooled sensitivity, specificity, and detection rate of ¹⁸F-labeled tracers were calculated with a random-effects model.

Results

A total of 46 studies met the included criteria; 17, 16, and 13 studies focused on ¹⁸F-choline, fluciclovine, and PSMA, respectively. The pooled sensitivities of ¹⁸F-choline and ¹⁸F-fluciclovine were 0.93 (95% CI, 0.85–0.98) and 0.80 (95% CI, 0.65–0.897), and the specificities were 0.91 (95% CI, 0.73–0.97) and 0.66 (95% CI, 0.50–0.79), respectively. The pooled detection rates of ¹⁸F-labeled choline, fluciclovine and PSMA were 66, 74, and 83%, respectively. Moreover, the detection rates of ¹⁸F-labeled choline, fluciclovine, and PSMA were 35, 23, and 58% for a PSA level less than 0.5 ng/ml; 41, 46, and 75% for a PSA level of 0.5–0.99 ng/ml; 62, 57, and 86% for a PSA level of 1.0–1.99 ng/ml; 80, 92, and 94% for a PSA level more than 2.0 ng/ml.

Conclusion

These three ¹⁸F-labeled tracers are promising for detecting BCR in prostate cancer patients, with ¹⁸F-choline showing superior diagnostic accuracy. In addition, the much higher detection rates of ¹⁸F-PSMA showed its superiority over other tracers, particularly in low PSA levels.

Systematic Review Registration

PROSPERO, identifier CRD42020212531.

Parameters predicting [18F]PSMA-1007 scan positivity and type and number of detected lesions in patients with biochemical recurrence of prostate cancer

BACKGROUND

Detection of the site of recurrence using PSMA-PET/CT is important to guide treatment in patients with biochemical recurrence of prostate cancer (PCa). The aim of this study was to evaluate the positivity rate of [¹⁸F]PSMA-1007-PET/CT in patients with biochemically recurrent PCa and identify parameters that predict scan positivity as well as the type and number of detected lesions. This monocentric retrospective study included 137 PCa patients with biochemical recurrence who underwent one or more [¹⁸F]PSMA-1007-PET/CT scans between August 2018 and June 2019. PET-positive malignant lesions were classified as local recurrence, lymph node (LN), bone or soft tissue lesions. The association between biochemical/paraclinical parameters, as PSA value, PSA doubling time, PSA velocity, Gleason score (GS) and androgen deprivation therapy (ADT), and scan positivity as well as type and number of detected lesions was evaluated using logistic regression analysis (binary outcomes) and Poisson models (count-type outcomes).

RESULTS

We included 175 [¹⁸F]PSMA-1007-PET/CT scans after radical prostatectomy (78%), external beam radiation therapy (8.8%), ADT (7.3%), brachytherapy (5.1%) and high intensity focused ultrasound (0.7%) as primary treatment (median PSA value 1.6 ng/ml). Positivity rate was 80%. PSA value and PSA velocity were significant predictors of scan positivity as well as of the presence of bone and soft tissue lesions and number of bone, LN and soft tissue lesions, both in uni- and/or multivariable analysis. Multivariable analysis also showed prior ADT as predictor of bone and soft tissue lesions, GS as predictor of the number of bone lesions and ongoing ADT as predictor of the number of LN lesions.

CONCLUSION

[¹⁸F]PSMA-1007-PET/CT showed a high positivity rate in patients with biochemically recurrent PCa. PSA value and PSA velocity were significant predictors of scan positivity as well as of the presence and number of bone and soft tissue lesions and the number of LN lesions. Our findings can guide clinicians in optimal patient selection for [¹⁸F]PSMA-1007-PET/CT and support further research leading to the development of a prediction nomogram.

Seek and Find: Current Prospective Evidence for Prostate-specific Membrane Antigen Imaging to Detect Recurrent Prostate Cancer

CONTEXT

Men with biochemically relapsed prostate cancer face a clinical conundrum. Depending on the detected distribution of disease, treatment goals may range from cure with focal therapy to palliative with systemic therapy to expectant observation. Retrospective studies of prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA)-based imaging demonstrate higher disease detection rates than conventional imaging.

OBJECTIVE

This review focuses on available prospective evidence for diagnostic use of PSMA-based imaging to accurately restage recurrent prostate cancer and explores the potential clinical impact, near future uses, and challenges for PSMA-based imaging in this setting.

EVIDENCE ACQUISITION

PubMed and EMBASE databases were searched for prospective studies with primary, secondary, or exploratory endpoints evaluating PSMA-based imaging for patients with recurrent prostate cancer published in English in the past 10 yrs.

EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS

We reviewed 48 prospective studies evaluating the role of PSMA positron emission tomography (PET) in recurrent prostate cancer. These studies establish the diagnostic accuracy and safety of PSMA PET using the 68Ga-PSMA-11 and 18F-DCFPyL radiotracers even at lower prostate-specific antigen (PSA) levels (0.5 ≤ PSA < 1.0 ng/m: disease detection rate 51-78%). The use of PSMA PET has been shown to result in changes in management in up to two-thirds of patients.

CONCLUSIONS

There is now higher-level regulatory-quality prospective evidence for PSMA-based imaging for the detection of recurrent prostate cancer. There is prospective evidence of superiority over cross-sectional imaging and bone scintigraphy, as well as for the alterations in disease management as a result of PSMA-based imaging.

PATIENT SUMMARY

When the prostate-specific antigen (PSA) level is rising after primary therapy, prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) positron emission tomography (PET) is excellent at detecting and localizing prostate cancer, even at low PSA levels. Those who benefit best from treatment modifications based on PSMA PET findings are yet to be defined.

Comparing the diagnostic performance of radiotracers in recurrent prostate cancer: a systematic review and network meta-analysis

Purpose

Many radiotracers are currently available for the detection of recurrent prostate cancer (rPC), yet many have not been compared head-to-head in comparative imaging studies. There is therefore an unmet need for evidence synthesis to guide evidence-based decisions in the selection of radiotracers. The objective of this study was therefore to assess the detection rate of various radiotracers for the rPC.

Methods

The PUBMED, EMBASE, and the EU and NIH trials databases were searched without date or language restriction for comparative imaging tracers for 13 radiotracers of principal interest. Key search terms included 18F-PSMA-1007, 18F-DCPFyl, 68Ga-PSMA-11, 18F-PSMA-11, 68Ga-PSMA-I&T, 68Ga-THP-PSMA, 64Cu-PSMA-617, 18F-JK-PSMA-7, 18F-Fluciclovine, 18F-FABC, 18F-Choline, 11C-Choline, and 68Ga-RM2. Studies reporting comparative imaging data in humans in rPC were selected. Single armed studies and matched pair analyses were excluded. Twelve studies with eight radiotracers were eligible for inclusion. Two independent reviewers screened all studies (using the PRISMA-NMA statement) for inclusion criteria, extracted data, and assessed risk of bias (using the QUADAS-2 tool). A network meta-analysis was performed using Markov-Chain Monte Carlo Bayesian analysis to obtain estimated detection rate odds ratios for each tracer combination.

Results

A majority of studies were judged to be at risk of publication bias. With the exception of 18F-PSMA-1007, little difference in terms of detection rate was revealed between the three most commonly used PSMA-radiotracers (⁶⁸Ga-PSMA-11, ¹⁸F-PSMA-1007, ¹⁸F-DCFPyl), which in turn showed clear superiority to choline and fluciclovine using the derived network.

Conclusion

Differences in patient-level detection rates were observed between PSMA- and choline-radiotracers. However, there is currently insufficient evidence to favour one of the four routinely used PSMA-radioligands (PSMA-11, PSMA-1007, PSMA-I&T, and DCFPyl) over another owing to the limited evidence base and risk of publication bias revealed by our systematic review. A further limitation was lack of reporting on diagnostic accuracy, which might favour radiotracers with low specificity in an analysis restricted only to detection rate. The NMA derived can be used to inform the design of future clinical trials and highlight areas where current evidence is weak.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s00259-021-05210-9.

Fluorine-18 labelled prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA)-1007 positron-emission tomography-computed tomography: normal patterns, pearls, and pitfalls

Prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA)-based positron-emission tomography (PET)-computed tomography (CT) has shown great promise in prostate cancer imaging. This technique has demonstrated particular utility in the staging of high-risk primary cancer and in the localisation of recurrent disease. The use of fluorine-18 PSMA-1007 is advantageous, as it is excreted via the hepatobiliary system rather than urinary and the longer half-life of fluorine-18 compared to gallium tracers, allows for PSMA imaging in centres without a gallium generator. However, imaging with this tracer is not without flaws and areas of ambiguity remain. In this article, the biodistribution, clinical indications, and pearls of ¹⁸F-PSMA-1007 PET-CT in patients with prostate cancer will be discussed, as well as the potential pitfalls in the reporting of these studies.