|
1
|
Matsumoto K, Akita H, Hashiguchi A, Takeda T, Kosaka T, Fukumoto K, Yasumizu Y, Tanaka N, Morita S, Mizuno R, Asanuma H, Oya M, Jinzaki M. Detection of the Highest-Grade Lesion in Multifocal Discordant Prostate Cancer by Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging. Clin Genitourin Cancer 2024; 22:102084. [PMID: 38608334 DOI: 10.1016/j.clgc.2024.102084] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/12/2024] [Accepted: 03/18/2024] [Indexed: 04/14/2024]
Abstract
PURPOSE Prostate cancer generally occurs multifocally. The lesions of the largest size and highest-grade are often concordant, and defined as an index tumor. However, these factors sometimes do not coincide within one lesion. In such discordant cases, not the largest size lesion but the highest-grade lesion is known to determine the prognosis. We focused on the multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (mpMRI) detectability of the highest-grade tumors in discordant cases. MATERIALS AND METHODS We investigated the detectability of the highest-grade tumor using preoperative mpMRI in 50 discordant patients who underwent radical prostatectomy. The radiologist was informed of the tumor location on the pathological tumor map, and mpMRI interpretation for each tumor was performed. RESULTS Prostate Imaging-Reporting and Data System (PI-RADS) scores of 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5 on preoperative mpMRI were assigned to 13, 1, 9, 16, and 11 of the largest tumors, respectively. On the other hand, scores of 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5 were assigned to 23, 0, 7, 19, and 1 of the highest-grade tumors, respectively. The difference between them was statistically significant (p=0.007). We also found that the largest anterior tumor frequently hid the ipsilateral posterior highest-grade tumor; the detection rate of the highest-grade tumor in this pattern was 42.1% (8 of 19 cases) CONCLUSION: We found that mpMRI detectability of the highest-grade tumor in discordant cases was inferior to that of the largest tumor with low malignant potential. Our results suggest that the risk of high-grade tumors which determine patient prognosis being overlooked.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kazuhiro Matsumoto
- Department of Urology, Keio University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.
| | - Hirotaka Akita
- Department of Diagnostic Radiology, Keio University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Akinori Hashiguchi
- Department of Pathology, Keio University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Toshikazu Takeda
- Department of Urology, Keio University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Takeo Kosaka
- Department of Urology, Keio University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Keishiro Fukumoto
- Department of Urology, Keio University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Yota Yasumizu
- Department of Urology, Keio University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Nobuyuki Tanaka
- Department of Urology, Keio University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Shinya Morita
- Department of Urology, Keio University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Ryuichi Mizuno
- Department of Urology, Keio University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Hiroshi Asanuma
- Department of Urology, Keio University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Mototsugu Oya
- Department of Urology, Keio University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Masahiro Jinzaki
- Department of Diagnostic Radiology, Keio University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
|
2
|
Brassetti A, Cacciatore L, Bove AM, Anceschi U, Proietti F, Misuraca L, Tuderti G, Flammia RS, Mastroianni R, Ferriero MC, Chiacchio G, D’Annunzio S, Pallares-Mendez R, Lombardo R, Leonardo C, De Nunzio C, Simone G. The Impact of Physical Activity on the Outcomes of Active Surveillance in Prostate Cancer Patients: A Scoping Review. Cancers (Basel) 2024; 16:630. [PMID: 38339381 PMCID: PMC10854832 DOI: 10.3390/cancers16030630] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/15/2024] [Revised: 01/29/2024] [Accepted: 01/30/2024] [Indexed: 02/12/2024] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Active surveillance has emerged as a valid therapeutic option in patients with low-risk prostate cancer, allowing for the deferral of definitive treatment until the time of possible disease progression. Although it is known that physical activity plays a protective role in the onset and progression of this tumor, its impact on patients with low-risk disease who are managed with active surveillance remains unclear. Our scoping review aims to summarize the existing evidence on this subject. EVIDENCE ACQUISITION On 9 April 2023, a systematic search was conducted using the PubMed and Scopus databases. The search employed the combination of the following terms: ("prostate cancer" OR "prostate tumor") AND ("active surveillance") AND ("physical activity" OR "physical exercise" OR "physical intensive activity" OR "intensive exercise") AND ("lifestyle"). Out of the 506 identified articles, 9 were used for the present scoping review, and their results were reported according to the PRISMA-ScR statement. EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS We discovered a lack of uniformity in the assessment of PA and its stratification by intensity. There was no consensus regarding what constitutes cancer progression in patients choosing expectant management. In terms of the impact of PA on AS outcomes, conflicting results were reported: some authors found no correlation, while others (six of total studies included) revealed that active men experience smaller increases in PSA levels compared to their sedentary counterparts. Additionally, higher levels of exercise were associated with a significantly reduced risk of PCa reclassification. CONCLUSION Due to the heterogeneity of the methodologies used in the available studies and the conflicting results reported, it is not possible to draw definitive conclusions concerning the role physical activity may play in the risk of prostate cancer progression in men managed with active surveillance.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Aldo Brassetti
- IRCCS “Regina Elena” National Cancer Institute, Department of Urology, Via Elio Chianesi 53, 00144 Rome, Italy; (A.B.); (A.M.B.); (U.A.); (F.P.); (L.M.); (G.T.); (R.S.F.); (R.M.); (M.C.F.); (G.C.); (S.D.); (R.P.-M.); (C.L.); (G.S.)
| | - Loris Cacciatore
- IRCCS “Regina Elena” National Cancer Institute, Department of Urology, Via Elio Chianesi 53, 00144 Rome, Italy; (A.B.); (A.M.B.); (U.A.); (F.P.); (L.M.); (G.T.); (R.S.F.); (R.M.); (M.C.F.); (G.C.); (S.D.); (R.P.-M.); (C.L.); (G.S.)
| | - Alfredo Maria Bove
- IRCCS “Regina Elena” National Cancer Institute, Department of Urology, Via Elio Chianesi 53, 00144 Rome, Italy; (A.B.); (A.M.B.); (U.A.); (F.P.); (L.M.); (G.T.); (R.S.F.); (R.M.); (M.C.F.); (G.C.); (S.D.); (R.P.-M.); (C.L.); (G.S.)
| | - Umberto Anceschi
- IRCCS “Regina Elena” National Cancer Institute, Department of Urology, Via Elio Chianesi 53, 00144 Rome, Italy; (A.B.); (A.M.B.); (U.A.); (F.P.); (L.M.); (G.T.); (R.S.F.); (R.M.); (M.C.F.); (G.C.); (S.D.); (R.P.-M.); (C.L.); (G.S.)
| | - Flavia Proietti
- IRCCS “Regina Elena” National Cancer Institute, Department of Urology, Via Elio Chianesi 53, 00144 Rome, Italy; (A.B.); (A.M.B.); (U.A.); (F.P.); (L.M.); (G.T.); (R.S.F.); (R.M.); (M.C.F.); (G.C.); (S.D.); (R.P.-M.); (C.L.); (G.S.)
| | - Leonardo Misuraca
- IRCCS “Regina Elena” National Cancer Institute, Department of Urology, Via Elio Chianesi 53, 00144 Rome, Italy; (A.B.); (A.M.B.); (U.A.); (F.P.); (L.M.); (G.T.); (R.S.F.); (R.M.); (M.C.F.); (G.C.); (S.D.); (R.P.-M.); (C.L.); (G.S.)
| | - Gabriele Tuderti
- IRCCS “Regina Elena” National Cancer Institute, Department of Urology, Via Elio Chianesi 53, 00144 Rome, Italy; (A.B.); (A.M.B.); (U.A.); (F.P.); (L.M.); (G.T.); (R.S.F.); (R.M.); (M.C.F.); (G.C.); (S.D.); (R.P.-M.); (C.L.); (G.S.)
| | - Rocco Simone Flammia
- IRCCS “Regina Elena” National Cancer Institute, Department of Urology, Via Elio Chianesi 53, 00144 Rome, Italy; (A.B.); (A.M.B.); (U.A.); (F.P.); (L.M.); (G.T.); (R.S.F.); (R.M.); (M.C.F.); (G.C.); (S.D.); (R.P.-M.); (C.L.); (G.S.)
| | - Riccardo Mastroianni
- IRCCS “Regina Elena” National Cancer Institute, Department of Urology, Via Elio Chianesi 53, 00144 Rome, Italy; (A.B.); (A.M.B.); (U.A.); (F.P.); (L.M.); (G.T.); (R.S.F.); (R.M.); (M.C.F.); (G.C.); (S.D.); (R.P.-M.); (C.L.); (G.S.)
| | - Maria Consiglia Ferriero
- IRCCS “Regina Elena” National Cancer Institute, Department of Urology, Via Elio Chianesi 53, 00144 Rome, Italy; (A.B.); (A.M.B.); (U.A.); (F.P.); (L.M.); (G.T.); (R.S.F.); (R.M.); (M.C.F.); (G.C.); (S.D.); (R.P.-M.); (C.L.); (G.S.)
| | - Giuseppe Chiacchio
- IRCCS “Regina Elena” National Cancer Institute, Department of Urology, Via Elio Chianesi 53, 00144 Rome, Italy; (A.B.); (A.M.B.); (U.A.); (F.P.); (L.M.); (G.T.); (R.S.F.); (R.M.); (M.C.F.); (G.C.); (S.D.); (R.P.-M.); (C.L.); (G.S.)
| | - Simone D’Annunzio
- IRCCS “Regina Elena” National Cancer Institute, Department of Urology, Via Elio Chianesi 53, 00144 Rome, Italy; (A.B.); (A.M.B.); (U.A.); (F.P.); (L.M.); (G.T.); (R.S.F.); (R.M.); (M.C.F.); (G.C.); (S.D.); (R.P.-M.); (C.L.); (G.S.)
| | - Rigoberto Pallares-Mendez
- IRCCS “Regina Elena” National Cancer Institute, Department of Urology, Via Elio Chianesi 53, 00144 Rome, Italy; (A.B.); (A.M.B.); (U.A.); (F.P.); (L.M.); (G.T.); (R.S.F.); (R.M.); (M.C.F.); (G.C.); (S.D.); (R.P.-M.); (C.L.); (G.S.)
| | - Riccardo Lombardo
- “Sapienza” University of Rome, Department of Urology, Via di Grottarossa 1035, 00189 Rome, Italy; (R.L.); (C.D.N.)
| | - Costantino Leonardo
- IRCCS “Regina Elena” National Cancer Institute, Department of Urology, Via Elio Chianesi 53, 00144 Rome, Italy; (A.B.); (A.M.B.); (U.A.); (F.P.); (L.M.); (G.T.); (R.S.F.); (R.M.); (M.C.F.); (G.C.); (S.D.); (R.P.-M.); (C.L.); (G.S.)
| | - Cosimo De Nunzio
- “Sapienza” University of Rome, Department of Urology, Via di Grottarossa 1035, 00189 Rome, Italy; (R.L.); (C.D.N.)
| | - Giuseppe Simone
- IRCCS “Regina Elena” National Cancer Institute, Department of Urology, Via Elio Chianesi 53, 00144 Rome, Italy; (A.B.); (A.M.B.); (U.A.); (F.P.); (L.M.); (G.T.); (R.S.F.); (R.M.); (M.C.F.); (G.C.); (S.D.); (R.P.-M.); (C.L.); (G.S.)
| |
Collapse
|
|
3
|
Arber T, Jaouen T, Campoy S, Rabilloud M, Souchon R, Abbas F, Moldovan PC, Colombel M, Crouzet S, Ruffion A, Neuville P, Rouvière O. Zone-specific computer-aided diagnosis system aimed at characterizing ISUP ≥ 2 prostate cancers on multiparametric magnetic resonance images: evaluation in a cohort of patients on active surveillance. World J Urol 2023; 41:3527-3533. [PMID: 37845554 DOI: 10.1007/s00345-023-04643-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/30/2023] [Accepted: 09/15/2023] [Indexed: 10/18/2023] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE To assess a region-of-interest-based computer-assisted diagnosis system (CAD) in characterizing aggressive prostate cancer on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) from patients under active surveillance (AS). METHODS A prospective biopsy database was retrospectively searched for patients under AS who underwent MRI and subsequent biopsy at our institution. MRI lesions targeted at baseline biopsy were retrospectively delineated to calculate the CAD score that was compared to the Prostate Imaging-Reporting and Data System (PI-RADS) version 2 score assigned at baseline biopsy. RESULTS 186 patients were selected. At baseline biopsy, 51 and 15 patients had International Society of Urological Pathology (ISUP) grade ≥ 2 and ≥ 3 cancer respectively. The CAD score had significantly higher specificity for ISUP ≥ 2 cancers (60% [95% confidence interval (CI): 51-68]) than the PI-RADS score (≥ 3 dichotomization: 24% [CI: 17-33], p = 0.0003; ≥ 4 dichotomization: 32% [CI: 24-40], p = 0.0003). It had significantly lower sensitivity than the PI-RADS ≥ 3 dichotomization (85% [CI: 74-92] versus 98% [CI: 91-100], p = 0.015) but not than the PI-RADS ≥ 4 dichotomization (94% [CI:85-98], p = 0.104). Combining CAD findings and PSA density could have avoided 47/184 (26%) baseline biopsies, while missing 3/51 (6%) ISUP 2 and no ISUP ≥ 3 cancers. Patients with baseline negative CAD findings and PSAd < 0.15 ng/mL2 who stayed on AS after baseline biopsy had a 9% (4/44) risk of being diagnosed with ISUP ≥ 2 cancer during a median follow-up of 41 months, as opposed to 24% (18/74) for the others. CONCLUSION The CAD could help define AS patients with low risk of aggressive cancer at baseline assessment and during subsequent follow-up.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Théo Arber
- Department of Urology, Hospices Civils de Lyon, Centre Hospitalier Lyon Sud, Pierre-Bénite, France
| | | | - Séphora Campoy
- Service de Biostatistique Et Bioinformatique, Hospices Civils de Lyon, Pôle Santé Publique, 69003, Lyon, France
- UMR 5558, Laboratoire de Biométrie Et Biologie Évolutive, CNRS, Équipe Biostatistique-Santé, 69100, Villeurbanne, France
| | - Muriel Rabilloud
- Service de Biostatistique Et Bioinformatique, Hospices Civils de Lyon, Pôle Santé Publique, 69003, Lyon, France
- UMR 5558, Laboratoire de Biométrie Et Biologie Évolutive, CNRS, Équipe Biostatistique-Santé, 69100, Villeurbanne, France
- Université de Lyon, Lyon, France
- Université Lyon 1, Lyon, France
| | | | - Fatima Abbas
- Service de Biostatistique Et Bioinformatique, Hospices Civils de Lyon, Pôle Santé Publique, 69003, Lyon, France
- UMR 5558, Laboratoire de Biométrie Et Biologie Évolutive, CNRS, Équipe Biostatistique-Santé, 69100, Villeurbanne, France
| | - Paul C Moldovan
- Department of Radiology, Hospices Civils de Lyon, Hôpital Edouard Herriot, 69437, Lyon, France
| | - Marc Colombel
- Université de Lyon, Lyon, France
- Université Lyon 1, Lyon, France
- Department of Urology, Hospices Civils de Lyon, Hôpital Edouard Herriot, 69437, Lyon, France
- Faculté de Médecine Lyon Est, Lyon, France
| | - Sébastien Crouzet
- LabTau, INSERM U1032, Lyon, France
- Université de Lyon, Lyon, France
- Université Lyon 1, Lyon, France
- Department of Urology, Hospices Civils de Lyon, Hôpital Edouard Herriot, 69437, Lyon, France
- Faculté de Médecine Lyon Est, Lyon, France
| | - Alain Ruffion
- Department of Urology, Hospices Civils de Lyon, Centre Hospitalier Lyon Sud, Pierre-Bénite, France
- Université de Lyon, Lyon, France
- Université Lyon 1, Lyon, France
- Faculté de Médecine Lyon Sud, Pierre Bénite, France
| | - Paul Neuville
- Department of Urology, Hospices Civils de Lyon, Centre Hospitalier Lyon Sud, Pierre-Bénite, France
| | - Olivier Rouvière
- LabTau, INSERM U1032, Lyon, France.
- Université de Lyon, Lyon, France.
- Université Lyon 1, Lyon, France.
- Department of Radiology, Hospices Civils de Lyon, Hôpital Edouard Herriot, 69437, Lyon, France.
- Faculté de Médecine Lyon Est, Lyon, France.
| |
Collapse
|
|
4
|
Iacob R, Stoicescu ER, Cerbu S, Manolescu DL, Bardan R, Cumpănaş A. Could Biparametric MRI Replace Multiparametric MRI in the Management of Prostate Cancer? Life (Basel) 2023; 13:465. [PMID: 36836822 PMCID: PMC9961917 DOI: 10.3390/life13020465] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/15/2023] [Revised: 02/02/2023] [Accepted: 02/04/2023] [Indexed: 02/11/2023] Open
Abstract
Prostate cancer (PCa) is a worldwide epidemiological problem, since it is one of the most prevalent types of neoplasia among men, and the third-leading cause of cancer-related deaths, after lung and colorectal tumors. Unfortunately, the early stages of PCa have a wide range of unspecific symptoms. For these reasons, early diagnosis and accurate evaluation of suspicious lesions are crucial. Multiparametric MRI (mpMRI) is currently the imaging modality of choice for diagnostic screening and local staging of PCa, but also has a leading role in guiding biopsies and in treatment biparametric MRI (bpMRI) could partially replace mpMRI due to its lack of adverse reactions caused by contrast agents, relatively lower costs, and shorter acquisition time. Further, 31 relevant articles regarding the advantages and disadvantages of the aforementioned imaging techniques were scanned. As a result, while bpMRI has comparable accuracy in detecting PCa, its roles in the other steps of PCa management are limited.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Roxana Iacob
- Doctoral School, “Victor Babes” University of Medicine and Pharmacy, 300041 Timisoara, Romania
- Discipline of Radiology and Medical Imaging, “Victor Babes” University of Medicine and Pharmacy Timisoara, Eftimie Murgu Square No. 2, 300041 Timisoara, Romania
| | - Emil-Robert Stoicescu
- Doctoral School, “Victor Babes” University of Medicine and Pharmacy, 300041 Timisoara, Romania
- Discipline of Radiology and Medical Imaging, “Victor Babes” University of Medicine and Pharmacy Timisoara, Eftimie Murgu Square No. 2, 300041 Timisoara, Romania
- Research Center for Pharmaco-Toxicological Evaluations, “Victor Babes” University of Medicine and Pharmacy Timisoara, Eftimie Murgu Square No. 2, 300041 Timisoara, Romania
| | - Simona Cerbu
- Discipline of Radiology and Medical Imaging, “Victor Babes” University of Medicine and Pharmacy Timisoara, Eftimie Murgu Square No. 2, 300041 Timisoara, Romania
| | - Diana-Luminiţa Manolescu
- Discipline of Radiology and Medical Imaging, “Victor Babes” University of Medicine and Pharmacy Timisoara, Eftimie Murgu Square No. 2, 300041 Timisoara, Romania
- Center for Research and Innovation in Precision Medicine of Respiratory Diseases (CRIPMRD), “Victor Babeș” University of Medicine and Pharmacy, 300041 Timișoara, Romania
| | - Răzvan Bardan
- Discipline of Urology, “Victor Babes” University of Medicine and Pharmacy Timisoara, Eftimie Murgu Square No. 2, 300041 Timisoara, Romania
| | - Alin Cumpănaş
- Discipline of Urology, “Victor Babes” University of Medicine and Pharmacy Timisoara, Eftimie Murgu Square No. 2, 300041 Timisoara, Romania
| |
Collapse
|
|
5
|
Treatment patterns and rates of upgrading and upstaging in prostate cancer patients with single GGG1 positive biopsy core. Urol Oncol 2022; 40:407.e9-407.e19. [DOI: 10.1016/j.urolonc.2022.06.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/05/2021] [Revised: 03/29/2022] [Accepted: 06/02/2022] [Indexed: 11/23/2022]
|
|
6
|
The role of preoperative prostatic shape in the recovery of urinary continence after robotic radical prostatectomy: a single cohort analysis. Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis 2022:10.1038/s41391-022-00563-0. [PMID: 35729328 DOI: 10.1038/s41391-022-00563-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/27/2022] [Revised: 05/13/2022] [Accepted: 06/10/2022] [Indexed: 11/09/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND To explore the role of preoperative MRI prostate shape in urinary incontinence after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP). METHODS Patients were stratified into four groups based on the mpMRI prostatic apex shape: Group A (prostatic apex overlapping the membranous urethra anteriorly and posteriorly), Group B and C (overlap of the prostatic apex of the anterior or posterior membranous urethra, respectively) and Group D (no overlap). Preoperative variables and intraoperative data were compared. Continence recovery was defined as no pad/day or 1 safety pad/day by an outpatient evaluation performed at 1, 3, 6, and 12 months after RARP. RESULTS One hundred patients underwent RARP were classified as belonging to Group A (n = 30), Group B (n = 16), Group C (n = 14), and Group D (n = 40). Group D showed a significantly more favorable urinary continence recovery after RARP respect to all the other shapes presenting any forms of overlapping (HR = 1.9, 95% CI 1.2-3.1, p = 0.007). The estimated HR remained substantially unchanged after adjusting by age, body mass index, CCI, prostate volume, and bladder neck sparing (HR = 1.9, 95% CI 1.1-3.2, p = 0.016). The continence recovery median time was 9 months for Group A + B + C (95% CI 5-11) and 4 months for Group D (95% CI 2-6) (p = 0.023). CONCLUSION Shape D showed a better continence recovery when compared to other shapes presenting any kind of overlapping of the prostatic apex over the membranous urethra.
Collapse
|
|
7
|
Courtney PT, Deka R, Kotha NV, Cherry DR, Salans MA, Nelson TJ, Kumar A, Luterstein E, Yip AT, Nalawade V, Parsons JK, Kader AK, Stewart TF, Rose BS. Metastasis and Mortality in Men With Low- and Intermediate-Risk Prostate Cancer on Active Surveillance. J Natl Compr Canc Netw 2022; 20:151-159. [PMID: 35130495 PMCID: PMC10399925 DOI: 10.6004/jnccn.2021.7065] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/08/2021] [Accepted: 05/27/2021] [Indexed: 11/17/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Active surveillance (AS) is a safe treatment option for men with low-risk, localized prostate cancer. However, the safety of AS for patients with intermediate-risk prostate cancer remains unclear. PATIENTS AND METHODS We identified men with NCCN-classified low-risk and favorable and unfavorable intermediate-risk prostate cancer diagnosed between 2001 and 2015 and initially managed with AS in the Veterans Health Administration. We analyzed progression to definitive treatment, metastasis, prostate cancer-specific mortality (PCSM), and all-cause mortality using cumulative incidences and multivariable competing-risks regression. RESULTS The cohort included 9,733 men, of whom 1,007 (10.3%) had intermediate-risk disease (773 [76.8%] favorable, 234 [23.2%] unfavorable), followed for a median of 7.6 years. The 10-year cumulative incidence of metastasis was significantly higher for patients with favorable (9.6%; 95% CI, 7.1%-12.5%; P<.001) and unfavorable intermediate-risk disease (19.2%; 95% CI, 13.4%-25.9%; P<.001) than for those with low-risk disease (1.5%; 95% CI, 1.2%-1.9%). The 10-year cumulative incidence of PCSM was also significantly higher for patients with favorable (3.7%; 95% CI, 2.3%-5.7%; P<.001) and unfavorable intermediate-risk disease (11.8%; 95% CI, 6.8%-18.4%; P<.001) than for those with low-risk disease (1.1%; 95% CI, 0.8%-1.4%). In multivariable competing-risks regression, favorable and unfavorable intermediate-risk patients had significantly increased risks of metastasis and PCSM compared with low-risk patients (all P<.001). CONCLUSIONS Compared with low-risk patients, those with favorable and unfavorable intermediate-risk prostate cancer managed with AS are at increased risk of metastasis and PCSM. AS may be an appropriate option for carefully selected patients with favorable intermediate-risk prostate cancer, though identification of appropriate candidates and AS protocols should be tested in future prospective studies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- P Travis Courtney
- 1Veterans Health Administration San Diego Health Care System, and.,2Department of Radiation Medicine and Applied Sciences
| | - Rishi Deka
- 1Veterans Health Administration San Diego Health Care System, and.,2Department of Radiation Medicine and Applied Sciences
| | - Nikhil V Kotha
- 1Veterans Health Administration San Diego Health Care System, and.,2Department of Radiation Medicine and Applied Sciences
| | - Daniel R Cherry
- 1Veterans Health Administration San Diego Health Care System, and.,2Department of Radiation Medicine and Applied Sciences
| | - Mia A Salans
- 1Veterans Health Administration San Diego Health Care System, and.,2Department of Radiation Medicine and Applied Sciences
| | - Tyler J Nelson
- 1Veterans Health Administration San Diego Health Care System, and.,2Department of Radiation Medicine and Applied Sciences
| | - Abhishek Kumar
- 1Veterans Health Administration San Diego Health Care System, and.,2Department of Radiation Medicine and Applied Sciences
| | - Elaine Luterstein
- 1Veterans Health Administration San Diego Health Care System, and.,2Department of Radiation Medicine and Applied Sciences
| | - Anthony T Yip
- 2Department of Radiation Medicine and Applied Sciences
| | | | - J Kellogg Parsons
- 1Veterans Health Administration San Diego Health Care System, and.,3Department of Urology, School of Medicine, University of California, San Diego.,4Janssen Pharmaceuticals Research and Development, LCC; and
| | - A Karim Kader
- 1Veterans Health Administration San Diego Health Care System, and.,3Department of Urology, School of Medicine, University of California, San Diego
| | - Tyler F Stewart
- 1Veterans Health Administration San Diego Health Care System, and.,4Janssen Pharmaceuticals Research and Development, LCC; and
| | - Brent S Rose
- 1Veterans Health Administration San Diego Health Care System, and.,2Department of Radiation Medicine and Applied Sciences
| |
Collapse
|
|
8
|
Hoeh B, Flammia R, Hohenhorst L, Sorce G, Chierigo F, Tian Z, Saad F, Gallucci M, Briganti A, Terrone C, Shariat SF, Graefen M, Tilki D, Kluth LA, Mandel P, Chun FK, Karakiewicz PI. Up- and downgrading in single intermediate-risk positive biopsy core prostate cancer. Prostate Int 2022; 10:21-27. [PMID: 35261911 PMCID: PMC8866049 DOI: 10.1016/j.prnil.2022.01.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/14/2021] [Revised: 01/10/2022] [Accepted: 01/17/2022] [Indexed: 11/04/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Up- and/or downgrading rates in single intermediate-risk positive biopsy core are unknown. Methods We identified single intermediate-risk (Gleason grade group (GGG) 2/GGG3) positive biopsy core prostate cancer patients (≤ cT2c and PSA ≤ 20 ng/mL) within the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database (2010–2015). Subsequently, separate uni- and multivariable logistic regression models tested for independent predictors of up- and downgrading. Results Of 1,328 assessable patients with single core positive intermediate-risk prostate cancer at biopsy, 972 (73%) harbored GGG2 versus 356 (27%) harbored GGG3. Median PSA (5.5 vs 5.7; p = 0.3), median age (62 vs 63 years; p = 0.07) and cT1-stage (77 vs 75%; p = 0.3) did not differ between GGG2 and GGG3 patients. Of individuals with single GGG2 positive biopsy core, 191 (20%) showed downgrading to GGG1 versus 35 (4%) upgrading to GGG4 or GGG5 at RP. Of individuals with single GGG3 positive biopsy core, 36 (10%) showed downgrading to GGG1 versus 42 (12%) significant upgrading to GGG4 or GGG5 at RP. In multivariable logistic regression models, elevated PSA (10–20 ng/mL) was an independent predictor of upgrading to GGG4/GGG5 in single GGG3 positive biopsy core patients (OR:2.89; 95%-CI: 1.31–6.11; p = 0.007). Conclusion In single GGG2 positive biopsy core patients, downgrading was four times more often recorded compared to upgrading. Conversely, in single GGG3 positive biopsy core patients, up- and downgrading rates were comparable and should be expected in one out of ten patients.
Collapse
|