1
|
Virarkar MK, Gruschkus SK, Ravizzini GC, Vulasala SSR, Javadi S, Bhosale P. Assessing the effectiveness of MRI, 18F-fluciclovine PET, SUV max, and PSA in detecting local recurrence of prostate cancer after prostatectomy. Pol J Radiol 2024; 89:e196-e203. [PMID: 38783912 PMCID: PMC11112415 DOI: 10.5114/pjr.2024.139007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/18/2023] [Accepted: 02/12/2024] [Indexed: 05/25/2024] Open
Abstract
Purpose The primary objective of this study was to evaluate the discriminatory utility of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), 18F-fluciclovine positron emission tomography (PET), maximum standardized uptake value (SUVmax), prostate-specific antigen (PSA), and combinations of these diagnostic modalities for detecting local prostate cancer recurrence in the setting of rising PSA after radical prostatectomy. Material and methods Patients were characterised for clinical features such as Gleason score, PSA at surgery, PSA at follow-up, follow-up MRI result, follow-up PET result, follow-up SUVmax, and follow-up disease status. The utility of diagnostic parameters for detecting disease recurrence at the prostatectomy bed was assessed using receiver operating characteristics (ROC) analysis to determine the area under the curve (AUC) for each model. Sensitivity, specificity, and positive/negative predictive values were also calculated. Optimal cut-off points for continuous variables were determined based on maximum Youden's J statistics. Results The study found that MRI had the highest concordance (96%), sensitivity (100%), specificity (91%), positive predictive value (93%), and negative predictive value (100%) among the diagnostic modalities. The AUC for MRI was 0.9545, indicating a high discriminatory ability for detecting prostate cancer local recurrence. When combined, PET and SUVmax (cut-off value of 2.85) showed an improved performance compared to using them individually, with an AUC of 0.8925. Conclusions The analysis suggests that MRI is the most effective imaging modality for detecting local prostate cancer recurrence, with 18F-fluciclovine PET and SUVmax also showing promising combined results. PSA has moderate discriminatory utility at follow-up but can still provide valuable information in detecting prostate cancer recurrence. Further research and recent references are needed to support these findings.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mayur K. Virarkar
- Department of Diagnostic Radiology, University of Florida College of Medicine, Jacksonville, USA
| | - Stephen K. Gruschkus
- Department of Biostatistics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, USA
| | - Gregory C. Ravizzini
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Division of Diagnostic Imaging, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, USA
| | - Sai Swarupa R. Vulasala
- Department of Diagnostic Radiology, University of Florida College of Medicine, Jacksonville, USA
| | - Sanaz Javadi
- Department of Abdominal Imaging, Division of Diagnostic Imaging, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, USA
| | - Priya Bhosale
- Department of Abdominal Imaging, Division of Diagnostic Imaging, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, USA
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Ah-Thiane L, Sargos P, Chapet O, Jolicoeur M, Terlizzi M, Salembier C, Boustani J, Prevost C, Gaudioz S, Derashodian T, Palumbo S, De Hertogh O, Créhange G, Zilli T, Supiot S. Managing postoperative biochemical relapse in prostate cancer, from the perspective of the Francophone group of Urological radiotherapy (GFRU). Cancer Treat Rev 2023; 120:102626. [PMID: 37734178 DOI: 10.1016/j.ctrv.2023.102626] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/12/2023] [Revised: 09/14/2023] [Accepted: 09/15/2023] [Indexed: 09/23/2023]
Abstract
Up to 50% of patients treated with radical surgery for localized prostate cancer may experience biochemical recurrence that requires appropriate management. Definitions of biochemical relapse may vary, but, in all cases, consist of an increase in a PSA without clinical or radiological signs of disease. Molecular imaging through to positron emission tomography has taken a preponderant place in relapse diagnosis, progressively replacing bone scan and CT-scan. Prostate bed radiotherapy is currently a key treatment, the action of which should be potentiated by androgen deprivation therapy. Nowadays perspectives consist in determining the best combination therapies, particularly thanks to next-generation hormone therapies, but not exclusively. Several trials are ongoing and should address these issues. We present here a literature review aiming to discuss the current management of biochemical relapse in prostate cancer after radical surgery, in lights of recent findings, as well as future perspectives.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Loic Ah-Thiane
- Department of Radiation Oncology, ICO René Gauducheau, St-Herblain, France
| | - Paul Sargos
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Bergonie Institute, Bordeaux, France
| | - Olivier Chapet
- Department of Radiation Oncology, CHU Lyon Sud, Pierre-Bénite, France
| | - Marjory Jolicoeur
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Charles Le Moyne Hospital, Montreal, Canada
| | - Mario Terlizzi
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Gustave Roussy Cancer Center, Villejuif, France
| | - Carl Salembier
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Europe Hospitals Brussels, Belgium
| | - Jihane Boustani
- Department of Radiation Oncology, CHU Besançon, Besançon, France
| | - Célia Prevost
- Department of Radiation Oncology, CHU Lyon Sud, Pierre-Bénite, France
| | - Sonya Gaudioz
- Department of Radiation Oncology, CHU Lyon Sud, Pierre-Bénite, France
| | - Talar Derashodian
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Sindi Ahluwalia Hawkins Centre, Kelowna, Canada
| | - Samuel Palumbo
- Department of Radiation Oncology, CHU UCL Namur-Sainte Elisabeth, Namur, Belgium
| | - Olivier De Hertogh
- Department of Radiation Oncology, CHR Verviers East Belgium, Verviers, Belgium
| | - Gilles Créhange
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Curie Institute, Saint-Cloud, France
| | - Thomas Zilli
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Geneva University Hospital, Geneva, Switzerland
| | - Stéphane Supiot
- Department of Radiation Oncology, ICO René Gauducheau, St-Herblain, France.
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Zhu M, Liang Z, Feng T, Mai Z, Jin S, Wu L, Zhou H, Chen Y, Yan W. Up-to-Date Imaging and Diagnostic Techniques for Prostate Cancer: A Literature Review. Diagnostics (Basel) 2023; 13:2283. [PMID: 37443677 DOI: 10.3390/diagnostics13132283] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/18/2023] [Revised: 06/29/2023] [Accepted: 06/30/2023] [Indexed: 07/15/2023] Open
Abstract
Prostate cancer (PCa) faces great challenges in early diagnosis, which often leads not only to unnecessary, invasive procedures, but to over-diagnosis and treatment as well, thus highlighting the need for modern PCa diagnostic techniques. The review aims to provide an up-to-date summary of chronologically existing diagnostic approaches for PCa, as well as their potential to improve clinically significant PCa (csPCa) diagnosis and to reduce the proliferation and monitoring of PCa. Our review demonstrates the primary outcomes of the most significant studies and makes comparisons across the diagnostic efficacies of different PCa tests. Since prostate biopsy, the current mainstream PCa diagnosis, is an invasive procedure with a high risk of post-biopsy complications, it is vital we dig out specific, sensitive, and accurate diagnostic approaches in PCa and conduct more studies with milestone findings and comparable sample sizes to validate and corroborate the findings.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ming Zhu
- Department of Urology, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing 100730, China
| | - Zhen Liang
- Department of Urology, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing 100730, China
| | - Tianrui Feng
- Department of Urology, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing 100730, China
| | - Zhipeng Mai
- Department of Urology, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing 100730, China
| | - Shijie Jin
- Department of Urology, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing 100730, China
| | - Liyi Wu
- Department of Urology, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing 100730, China
| | - Huashan Zhou
- Department of Urology, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing 100730, China
| | - Yuliang Chen
- Department of Urology, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing 100730, China
| | - Weigang Yan
- Department of Urology, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing 100730, China
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Calderone CE, Turner EM, Hayek OE, Summerlin D, West JT, Rais-Bahrami S, Galgano SJ. Contemporary Review of Multimodality Imaging of the Prostate Gland. Diagnostics (Basel) 2023; 13:diagnostics13111860. [PMID: 37296712 DOI: 10.3390/diagnostics13111860] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/10/2023] [Revised: 05/03/2023] [Accepted: 05/23/2023] [Indexed: 06/12/2023] Open
Abstract
Tissue changes and the enlargement of the prostate, whether benign or malignant, are among the most common groups of diseases that affect men and can have significant impacts on length and quality of life. The prevalence of benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) increases significantly with age and affects nearly all men as they grow older. Other than skin cancers, prostate cancer is the most common cancer among men in the United States. Imaging is an essential component in the diagnosis and management of these conditions. Multiple modalities are available for prostate imaging, including several novel imaging modalities that have changed the landscape of prostate imaging in recent years. This review will cover the data relating to commonly used standard-of-care prostate imaging modalities, advances in newer technologies, and newer standards that impact prostate gland imaging.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Carli E Calderone
- Department of Radiology, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL 35294, USA
| | - Eric M Turner
- Department of Radiology, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL 35294, USA
| | - Omar E Hayek
- Department of Urology, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL 35294, USA
| | - David Summerlin
- Department of Radiology, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL 35294, USA
| | - Janelle T West
- Department of Radiology, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL 35294, USA
| | - Soroush Rais-Bahrami
- Department of Radiology, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL 35294, USA
- Department of Urology, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL 35294, USA
- O'Neal Comprehensive Cancer Center at UAB, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL 35294, USA
| | - Samuel J Galgano
- Department of Radiology, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL 35294, USA
- O'Neal Comprehensive Cancer Center at UAB, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL 35294, USA
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Wu C, Marcus C, Baum Y, Kucuk O, Schuster DM. Treatment Response to Lycopene in Recurrent Prostate Cancer Confirmed on 18 F-Fluciclovine PET/CT. Clin Nucl Med 2023; 48:361-363. [PMID: 36728146 DOI: 10.1097/rlu.0000000000004547] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/03/2023]
Abstract
ABSTRACT 18 F-fluciclovine (Axumin; Blue Earth Diagnostics, Ltd, Oxford, United Kingdom) PET has shown value in detecting biochemical recurrent prostatic cancer. Lycopene, a plant-based carotenoid, is reported to have potential inhibitory effect on prostate cancer, as a complementary treatment. We report a case of biochemically recurrent prostate cancer showing treatment response to lycopene as seen on an 18 F-fluciclovine PET/CT correlating with serum prostate-specific antigen response.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Chenxi Wu
- From the Division of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, Department of Radiology and Imaging Sciences, Emory University School of Medicine
| | - Charles Marcus
- From the Division of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, Department of Radiology and Imaging Sciences, Emory University School of Medicine
| | - Yoram Baum
- From the Division of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, Department of Radiology and Imaging Sciences, Emory University School of Medicine
| | - Omer Kucuk
- Department of Hematology and Medical Oncology, Emory University School of Medicine, and the Winship Cancer Institute of Emory University, Atlanta, GA
| | - David M Schuster
- From the Division of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, Department of Radiology and Imaging Sciences, Emory University School of Medicine
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Voter AF, Werner RA, Pienta KJ, Gorin MA, Pomper MG, Solnes LB, Rowe SP. Piflufolastat F-18 ( 18F-DCFPyL) for PSMA PET imaging in prostate cancer. Expert Rev Anticancer Ther 2022; 22:681-694. [DOI: 10.1080/14737140.2022.2081155] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/04/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Andrew F. Voter
- The Russell H. Morgan Department of Radiology and Radiological Science, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
- Transitional Year Residency Program, Aurora St. Luke’s Medical Center, Advocate Aurora Health, Milwaukee, WI, USA
| | - Rudolf A. Werner
- The Russell H. Morgan Department of Radiology and Radiological Science, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany
| | - Kenneth J. Pienta
- The James Buchanan Brady Urological Institute and Department of Urology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
- Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Michael A. Gorin
- Urology Associates and UPMC Western Maryland, Cumberland, MD, USA
- Department of Urology, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - Martin G. Pomper
- The Russell H. Morgan Department of Radiology and Radiological Science, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
- The James Buchanan Brady Urological Institute and Department of Urology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
- Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Lilja B. Solnes
- The Russell H. Morgan Department of Radiology and Radiological Science, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
- Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Steven P. Rowe
- The Russell H. Morgan Department of Radiology and Radiological Science, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
- The James Buchanan Brady Urological Institute and Department of Urology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
- Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Beinecke JM, Anders P, Schurrat T, Heider D, Luster M, Librizzi D, Hauschild AC. Evaluation of machine learning strategies for imaging confirmed prostate cancer recurrence prediction on electronic health records. Comput Biol Med 2022; 143:105263. [PMID: 35131608 DOI: 10.1016/j.compbiomed.2022.105263] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/21/2021] [Revised: 01/21/2022] [Accepted: 01/21/2022] [Indexed: 11/03/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The main screening parameter to monitor prostate cancer recurrence (PCR) after primary treatment is the serum concentration of prostate-specific antigen (PSA). In recent years, Ga-68-PSMA PET/CT has become an important method for additional diagnostics in patients with biochemical recurrence. PURPOSE While Ga-68-PSMA PET/CT performs better, it is an expensive, invasive, and time-consuming examination. Therefore, in this study, we aim to employ modern multivariate Machine Learning (ML) methods on electronic health records (EHR) of prostate cancer patients to improve the prediction of imaging confirmed PCR (IPCR). METHODS We retrospectively analyzed the clinical information of 272 patients, who were examined using Ga-68-PSMA PET/CT. The PSA values ranged from 0 ng/mL to 2270.38 ng/mL with a median PSA level at 1.79 ng/mL. We performed a descriptive analysis using Logistic Regression. Additionally, we evaluated the predictive performance of Logistic Regression, Support Vector Machine, Gradient Boosting, and Random Forest. Finally, we assessed the importance of all features using Ensemble Feature Selection (EFS). RESULTS The descriptive analysis found significant associations between IPCR and logarithmic PSA values as well as between IPCR and performed hormonal therapy. Our models were able to predict IPCR with an AUC score of 0.78 ± 0.13 (mean ± standard deviation) and a sensitivity of 0.997 ± 0.01. Features such as PSA, PSA doubling time, PSA velocity, hormonal therapy, radiation treatment, and injected activity show high importance for IPCR prediction using EFS. CONCLUSION This study demonstrates the potential of employing a multitude of parameters into multivariate ML models to improve identification of non-recurring patients compared to the current focus on the main screening parameter (PSA). We showed that ML models are able to predict IPCR, detectable by Ga-68-PSMA PET/CT, and thereby pave the way for optimized early imaging and treatment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jacqueline Michelle Beinecke
- Department of Mathematics and Computer Science at the Philipps University Marburg, Germany; Institute for Medical Informatics at the University Medical Center Göttingen, Göttingen, Germany.
| | - Patrick Anders
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital Marburg, Germany
| | - Tino Schurrat
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital Marburg, Germany
| | - Dominik Heider
- Department of Mathematics and Computer Science at the Philipps University Marburg, Germany
| | - Markus Luster
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital Marburg, Germany
| | - Damiano Librizzi
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital Marburg, Germany
| | - Anne-Christin Hauschild
- Department of Mathematics and Computer Science at the Philipps University Marburg, Germany; Institute for Medical Informatics at the University Medical Center Göttingen, Göttingen, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Payne H, Bomanji J, Bottomley D, Scarsbrook AF, Teoh EJ. Impact of 18F-fluciclovine PET/CT on salvage radiotherapy plans for men with recurrence of prostate cancer postradical prostatectomy. Nucl Med Commun 2022; 43:201-211. [PMID: 34669678 PMCID: PMC8754096 DOI: 10.1097/mnm.0000000000001501] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/03/2021] [Accepted: 10/04/2021] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Imaging options to localize biochemical recurrence (BCR) of prostate cancer after radical prostatectomy (RP) are limited, especially at low prostate-specific antigen (PSA) levels. The FALCON study evaluated the impact of 18F-fluciclovine PET/CT on management plans for patients with BCR. Here, we evaluate salvage radiotherapy decisions in patients post-RP. METHODS We conducted a subgroup analysis of post-RP patients enrolled in FALCON who had a prescan plan for salvage radiotherapy (± androgen-deprivation therapy). Patients' treatment plans post-18F-fluciclovine PET/CT were compared with their prescan plans. Fisher exact test was used to determine the impact of PSA and Gleason sum on positivity and anatomical patterns of uptake. RESULTS Sixty-five (63%) FALCON patients had undergone RP. Of these, 62 (median PSA, 0.32 ng/mL) had a prescan plan for salvage radiotherapy. Twenty-one (34%) had 18F-fluciclovine-avid lesions. Disease was confined to the prostate bed in 11 patients (52%) and to the pelvis in a further 5 (24%), while 5 (24%) had extrapelvic findings. Trends towards more disseminated disease with increasing PSA or Gleason sum were observed but did not reach statistical significance. Postscan, 25 (40%) patients had a management change; 17 (68%) were changed to the treatment modality (8 to systemic therapy, 8 to active surveillance, 1 other) and 8 (32%) were radiotherapy field modifications. CONCLUSIONS Incorporating 18F-fluciclovine PET/CT into treatment planning may help identify patients suitable for salvage radiotherapy, help augment planned radiotherapy to better target lesions and support the clinician to optimise patient management.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Heather Payne
- Department of Oncology, University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London
| | - Jamshed Bomanji
- Institute of Nuclear Medicine, University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London
| | | | | | - Eugene J. Teoh
- Departments of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Oxford University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Oxford, UK (at the time of study conduct)
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Galgano SJ, West JT, Rais-Bahrami S. Role of molecular imaging in the detection of localized prostate cancer. Ther Adv Urol 2022; 14:17562872221105018. [PMID: 35755177 PMCID: PMC9218890 DOI: 10.1177/17562872221105018] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/03/2022] [Accepted: 05/17/2022] [Indexed: 11/17/2022] Open
Abstract
Molecular imaging of prostate cancer continues to grow, with recent inclusion of several positron emission tomography (PET) radiotracers into the recent National Comprehensive Cancer Network guidelines and the US Food and Drug Administration approval of prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA)-targeted radiotracers. While much of the work for many of these radiotracers is focused on systemic staging and restaging in both newly diagnosed high-risk prostate cancer and biochemically recurrent disease patients, the potential role of molecular imaging for the detection of localized prostate cancer has not yet been fully established. The primary aim of this article will be to present the potential role for molecular imaging in the detection of localized prostate cancer and discuss potential advantages and disadvantages to utilization of both PET/computed tomography (CT) and PET/magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) for this clinical indication of use.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Samuel J Galgano
- Department of Radiology, The University of Alabama at Birmingham, 619 19th Street South, JT J779, Birmingham, AL 35294, USA
| | - Janelle T West
- Department of Radiology, The University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, USA
| | - Soroush Rais-Bahrami
- Department of Radiology, The University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, USA
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Bratt O. Has the time come for routine use of PET/CT for guiding treatment of biochemical recurrence after radical prostatectomy? RE: JaniAB, et al. 18F-fluciclovine-PET/CT imaging versus conventional imaging alone to guide postprostatectomy salvage radiotherapy for prostate cancer (EMPIRE-1): a single centre, open-label, phase 2/3 randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2021 May 22;55:1895-1904. Scand J Urol 2021; 55:420-421. [PMID: 34633894 DOI: 10.1080/21681805.2021.1942192] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/20/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Ola Bratt
- Department of Urology, Institute of Clinical Science, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Bulbul JE, Grybowski D, Lovrec P, Solanki AA, Gabriel MS, Wagner RH, Savir-Baruch B. Positivity Rate of [ 18F]Fluciclovine PET/CT in Patients with Suspected Prostate Cancer Recurrence at PSA Levels Below 1 ng/mL. Mol Imaging Biol 2021; 24:42-49. [PMID: 34480289 DOI: 10.1007/s11307-021-01644-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/21/2021] [Revised: 08/16/2021] [Accepted: 08/17/2021] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE Early and precise localization of recurrent prostate cancer lesions after local therapy facilitates optimal disease management. Here, we present results from a single-center study to evaluate the utility of [18F]fluciclovine PET/CT to localize prostate cancer recurrence in patients with PSA <1 ng/mL. PROCEDURES Data from men who underwent [18F]fluciclovine PET/CT (August 2016-March 2020) for suspected recurrent prostate cancer and who had a PSA value <1ng/mL were retrospectively reviewed. The number of positive scans (positivity rates, PR) was calculated for the whole body, prostate/bed, and extraprostatic regions (pelvic or extrapelvic lymph nodes, bones, and soft tissue). PR were stratified by pre-scan PSA. RESULTS Data from 113 patients were included. In total, 98 (87%) were post-prostatectomy and 15 (13%) had received non-surgical primary therapy. Twenty patients (18%) were receiving ADT at the time of the scan, 91 (81%) were not, and ADT status was not known for 2 (1.8%) patients. The overall PR at PSA <1ng/mL was 59% (67/113). For the prostate/bed, it was 35% (40/113), and for extraprostatic locations, it was 37% (42/113). At PSA >0-<0.2, 0.2-<0.5, and 0.5-<1 ng/mL, the overall PR was 43% (10/23), 70% (35/50), and 55% (22/40), respectively. In the prostate/bed, these were 13% (3/23), 50% (25/50), and 30% (12/40), respectively, and in extraprostatic lesions were 30% (7/23), 44% (22/50), and 33% (13/40), respectively. Pelvic lymph nodes were the most common site for extraprostatic lesions (29/113, 26%). PR in extrapelvic lymph nodes, bone, and soft tissue were 8.0%, 12%, and 3.5%, respectively. Soft tissue lesions comprised lung nodules (n=3) and a perirectal mass implant (n=1). CONCLUSIONS Despite low PSA values, more than half of patients had positive [18F]fluciclovine PET/CT findings. Patients with low PSA levels may demonstrate suspicious findings outside of the pelvis, including abdominal lymph nodes and metastatic disease to bones and lungs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jad El Bulbul
- Department of Radiology, Loyola University Medical Center, 2160 S 1st Ave, Maywood, IL, 60153, USA
| | - Damian Grybowski
- Department of Radiology, Loyola University Medical Center, 2160 S 1st Ave, Maywood, IL, 60153, USA
| | - Petra Lovrec
- Department of Radiology, Loyola University Medical Center, 2160 S 1st Ave, Maywood, IL, 60153, USA
| | - Abhishek A Solanki
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Loyola University Medical Center, 2160 S 1st Ave, Maywood, IL, 60153, USA
| | - Medhat S Gabriel
- Department of Radiology, Loyola University Medical Center, 2160 S 1st Ave, Maywood, IL, 60153, USA
| | - Robert H Wagner
- Department of Radiology, Loyola University Medical Center, 2160 S 1st Ave, Maywood, IL, 60153, USA
| | - Bital Savir-Baruch
- Department of Radiology, Loyola University Medical Center, 2160 S 1st Ave, Maywood, IL, 60153, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Letter regarding " 18F-Fluciclovine PET/CT performance in biochemical recurrence of prostate cancer: a systematic review". Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis 2021; 24:944-945. [PMID: 34239047 DOI: 10.1038/s41391-021-00420-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/19/2021] [Revised: 05/27/2021] [Accepted: 06/22/2021] [Indexed: 11/08/2022]
|