Evaluation of the graded redefined assessment of strength, sensibility and prehension (GRASSP) in children with tetraplegia

Use of the Physical Abilities and Mobility Scale (PAMS) in Children Receiving Inpatient Rehabilitation for Spinal Cord Related Paralysis

OBJECTIVES

To investigate the performance of the Physical Abilities and Mobility Scale (PAMS) in children receiving inpatient rehabilitation for paralysis related to spinal cord disease and injury (SCD/SCI).

METHODS

Participants were 146 children with paralysis related to SCD/SCI, aged 2-21, admitted between January 2010 and 2017 for inpatient rehabilitation at a single free-standing academically affiliated pediatric rehabilitation hospital. Retrospective chart review was performed to obtain admission and discharge scores on the PAMS and the functional independence measure for children (WeeFIM®), collected as part of clinical care. Internal consistency was evaluated using Cronbach's alpha. Inter-rater reliability was evaluated through overall agreement, Pearson correlations, and intraclass correlations. Construct validity was examined through exploratory factor analysis. Criterion validity was explored through correlations of PAMS overall and item scores with WeeFIM® total and subscale scores. Sensitivity to change was tested using paired t-tests examining differences between admission and discharge scores for each item and for the total score on the PAMS.

RESULTS

Internal consistency and inter-rater reliability were high (0.94 at admission and 0.95 at discharge). Total PAMS scores are highly correlated with total WeeFIM®, mobility, self-care, and cognitive subscores at admission and discharge. Correlations with the WeeFIM® ranged from low (cognitive) to strong (mobility). Total PAMS score and all individual items increased significantly between admission and discharge.

CONCLUSIONS

The PAMS is a useful measure capturing incremental and granular functional motor skills changes occurring during inpatient rehabilitation for children with spinal cord-related paralysis.

Evaluation of the Capabilities of Upper Extremity Test (CUE-T) in Children With Tetraplegia

Background: The Capabilities of Upper Extremity Test (CUE-T) is a spinal cord injury (SCI)-specific instrument based on the CUE Questionnaire (CUE-Q). Objective: To evaluate the psychometric properties of CUE-T in children with cervical SCI and determine the lowest age appropriate for test administration. Method: In this repeated measures multicenter study, 39 youths, mean age 12.3 years and mean time post injury 5.14 years, completed two administrations of the CUE-T. Test-retest reliability, internal consistency, and known groups validity were measured. Concurrent and discriminant validity were measured against previously validated measures: CUE-Q, Graded Redefined Assessment of Strength, Sensibility and Prehension (GRASSP), Spinal Cord Independence Measure (SCIM) III, SCIM III-Self Care (SCIM-SC), and SCIM-Mobility. Results: The CUE-T scores demonstrated strong test-retest reliability (ICC ≥ 0.95), strong internal consistency (α ≥ 0.90), and acceptable individual item agreement (κ ≥ 0.49). The hand subscale had better scores (p < .05) for the motor incomplete versus complete known groups, and the arm, hand, and side subscales had better scores (p < .05) for higher versus lower strength groups. The CUE-T had strong concurrent validity with the CUE-Q (r = 0.85-0.87), GRASSP (r = 0.78-0.90), and SCIM-SC (r = 0.70) and moderate-to-weak correlation with the total SCIM (r = 0.65) and SCIM-Mobility (r = 0.51). Children older than 6 years with mature grasp patterns were able to complete the CUE-T. Conclusion: The CUE-T scores are reliable and valid for use in children with cervical SCI older than 6 years of age.