Risk factors for dysphagia after a spinal cord injury: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Methods of diagnosis and rehabilitation of dysphagia in patients with spinal cord injury: a systematic review

INTRODUCTION

Latest epidemiological metrics put a global prevalence of 20.6 million people suffering from spinal cord injury (SCI), leading to a burden of functional disability, deterioration in quality of life and reduced life expectancy. A thorough statement of diagnostic methods and treatment protocols for swallowing disorders after SCI stands as a major priority to streamline patient care and cost-sharing. Here we have provided a systematic overview of the evidence on diagnostic and rehabilitation protocols of dysphagia in the SCI population.

EVIDENCE ACQUISITION

The literature was searched in six electronic databases up to April 30th, 2024. Screening the 521 retrieved articles for inclusion criteria resulted in the selection of 43 studies that reported assessment tools and rehabilitation protocols for dysphagia in patients with SCI. Two researchers extracted the data in parallel, and inter-rater reliability (IRR) was used to estimate inter-coder agreement and then κ statistic to measure accuracy and precision. Based on PRISMA concepts and quality assessment steps, a k coefficient of at least 0.9 was obtained in all data extraction steps. All reports were assessed for risk of bias using the NIH Quality Assessment Toolkit. The study protocol was registered on PROSPERO (CRD42023449137).

EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS

Dysphagia assessment methods were collected and grouped into four different macro categories (clinical assessment, rating scale, self-reported questionnaire, and instrumental assessment). It was found that the Bedside Swallow Evaluation (BSE) for the clinical assessment category (50%), the Bazaz score (32.5%) for the rating scale category, the Eating Assessment Tool-10 (EAT-10) (44.4%) for the self-reported questionnaire category, and the Videofluoroscopic Study of Swallowing (VFSS) (48.9%) for the instrumental assessment category were the most representative tools. The rehabilitation protocols described included either an early oral feeding exclusion or a consistency-modified oral intake, postural adaptations, oxygen therapy with a high-flow nasal cannula combined with indirect/direct therapy, specific exercises, and neuromuscular electrical stimulation.

CONCLUSIONS

Methods of diagnosis and rehabilitation protocols for dysphagia in SCI patients appear inconsistent. Further rigorous studies are needed to achieve better clinical handling in SCI settings while lowering the load of patient morbidity and related healthcare costs.

Risk Factors for Dysphagia After Traumatic Cervical Spinal Cord Injury: A Retrospective Study

OBJECTIVE

To identify risk factors for dysphagia in individuals who sustained traumatic cervical SCI. The pathophysiologic mechanisms of dysphagia in individuals with traumatic cervical spinal cord injury (SCI) are not well understood yet. Several risk factors for developing dysphagia after SCI were postulated including mechanical ventilation, tracheostomy, age, female sex, anterior surgical approach, SCI severity, and multilevel spinal fusion.

DESIGN

Retrospective analysis: Candidate explanatory variables, including injury severity, age, neurological level of injury, surgical approach, number of fused spinal segments, and tracheostomy including its type, were analyzed using univariate and multivariable statistical analyses.

SETTING

We included patients, who were treated at the BG Trauma Center Murnau between 2013 and 2022.

PARTICIPANTS

Datasets of a total of 407 patients with traumatic cervical SCI were included.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Dysphagia prevalence and identification of associated risk factors.

RESULTS

Our analysis included 407 individuals, of whom 22.6% had dysphagia. Tracheostomy and age were identified as the main risk factors for dysphagia after traumatic cervical SCI. Contrary to previous literature, injury severity, an anterior surgical approach, the type of tracheostomy, a higher neurological level of SCI, and multilevel spinal fusion did not show an increased risk after accounting for other factors.

CONCLUSIONS

Our study identifies age and tracheostomy as primary risk factors for dysphagia after SCI, allowing to identify patients at risk and inform early-stage clinical management.

Spinal cord injury and risk of overall and type specific cardiovascular diseases: A meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Cardiovascular disease (CVD) is a growing concern among people with spinal cord injury (SCI). This meta-analysis aims to explore the risk of overall CVD and specific types of cardiovascular events among SCI patients.

METHODS

This meta-analysis is registered on PROSPERO (CRD CRD42024537888). The data sources comprised PubMed, Embase, the Cochrane Library, and reference lists of the included studies. The literature collection span is from database establishment until April 17, 2024. This meta-analysis encompassed observational studies investigating the association between SCI and the risk of overall types of CVD or specific CVD types. Risk of bias was evaluated utilizing the Newcastle-Ottawa Quality Assessment Scale (NOS) and the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ) Scale. Odds ratios (ORs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were aggregated using a random-effects model.

RESULTS

Our initial search generated 5357 relevant records form these international databases. This meta-analysis encompassed 9 observational studies involving 2,282,691 individuals, comprising 193,045 patients with SCI and 2,209,646 controls. We observed a 1.56-fold [OR = 1.56, 95% CI (1.43, 1.70), I2 = 91.3%, P < 0.001] rise in the risk of overall types of CVD among SCI patients, with a 1.82-fold increase in males and a 1.76-fold increase in females. SCI patients without comorbidities exhibited a 2.10-fold elevated risk of overall CVD types, while those with comorbidities had a 1.48-fold increased risk. Concerning specific CVD types, SCI patients showed a 1.58-fold [OR = 1.57, 95% CI (1.22, 2.03), I2 = 92.4%] higher risk of myocardial infarction, a 1.52-fold [OR = 1.52, 95% CI (1.07, 2.16), I2 = 88.7%] increase in atrial fibrillation, a 1.64-fold [OR = 1.64, 95% CI (1.22, 2.20), I2 = 95.5%] elevation in heart failure risk, and 2.38-fold [OR = 2.38, 95% CI (1.29, 4.40), I2 = 92.5%] increments in stroke risk. But there was no statistically significant difference in the risk of hypertension [OR = 1.54, 95% CI (0.98, 2.42), I2 = 96.6%].

CONCLUSIONS

The risk of overall CVD in SCI patients surpassed that of the non-SCI control group, with elevated risks of specific cardiovascular events like myocardial infarction, atrial fibrillation, heart failure, and stroke. Clinicians should prioritize awareness of CVD risks in SCI patients.

A review of the pathogenesis of epilepsy based on the microbiota-gut-brain-axis theory

The pathogenesis of epilepsy is related to the microbiota-gut-brain axis, but the mechanism has not been clarified. The microbiota-gut-brain axis is divided into the microbiota-gut-brain axis (upward pathways) and the brain-gut-microbiota axis (downward pathways) according to the direction of conduction. Gut microorganisms are involved in pathological and physiological processes in the human body and participate in epileptogenesis through neurological, immunological, endocrine, and metabolic pathways, as well as through the gut barrier and blood brain barrier mediated upward pathways. After epilepsy, the downward pathway mediated by the HPA axis and autonomic nerves triggers "leaky brain "and "leaky gut," resulting in the formation of microbial structures and enterobacterial metabolites associated with epileptogenicity, re-initiating seizures via the upward pathway. Characteristic changes in microbial and metabolic pathways in the gut of epileptic patients provide new targets for clinical prevention and treatment of epilepsy through the upward pathway. Based on these changes, this review further redescribes the pathogenesis of epilepsy and provides a new direction for its prevention and treatment.

Low Nutrition before Injury Is a Risk Factor for Dysphagia in Older Patients with Cervical Spinal Cord Injury: Based on a Multicenter Data of 707 Patients

Introduction

For older adults, dysphagia is a serious problem that can occur after spinal cord injury (SCI), but its risk factors are unclear. This study aimed to identify risk factors for dysphagia in elderly patients (≥65 years) with cervical SCI.

Methods

This multicenter study included 707 patients with cervical SCI (mean age 75.3 years). Univariate and multivariate analyses were conducted for patient characteristics and geriatric nutritional risk index (GNRI).

Results

Dysphagia occurred in 69 patients (9.8%). The significant factors were as follows: male sex (odds ratio [OR] 3.43), GNRI <92 (1.83), dementia (2.94), fracture (3.40), complete paralysis (3.61), anterior surgery (3.74), and tracheostomy (17.06). Age was not identified as a risk factor.

Conclusions

Low GNRI before injury was one of the independent risk factors for dysphagia after geriatric cervical SCI. GNRI represents the comprehensive nutritional status of the elderly and reflects feeding function and its recovery capacity.

Effects of Cervical Bracing on Elderly Patients With Dysphagia

PURPOSE

This study aimed to determine if cervical bracing with a PMT collar increases risk of airway invasion and pharyngeal residue in elderly patients with dysphagia. Additionally, it aimed to identify patient preference for cervical bracing during deglutition.

METHOD

Twenty-one patients underwent a videofluoroscopic swallow study. Thin liquid, nectar thick liquid, pudding, and cracker were administered with cervical collar on and off with order of condition randomized. The Penetration-Aspiration Scale (PAS) was used to grade swallows, with McNemar's test of symmetry used to determine whether the categorical PAS score was similar between conditions. Pharyngeal residue was measured following swallows. Patients were asked which condition they preferred, and which was more comfortable with "no difference" being a selection.

RESULTS

No significant difference in PAS categorization score was measured for any consistency (p = .317-.919). Significantly more pyriform sinus residue was measured in the collar off condition (p = .003), albeit amounts were within normative range, with no difference measured in vallecula residue between conditions (p = .939). Forty-five percent of participants preferred to swallow with the collar off, while 55% indicated no preference. Forty-one percent of participants indicated increased comfort with collar off, while 59% indicated no difference in comfort. No participant preferred swallowing or indicated increased comfort with the collar on.

CONCLUSIONS

Presence of a cervical collar in elderly patients with dysphagia did not result in a significant difference in airway invasion or total pharyngeal residue. There was significantly more residue in the pyriform sinuses when cervical bracing was removed. The majority of patients did not indicate a difference in preference or comfort between collar on/off conditions.

Adaptation and Validation of the Standardized Swallowing Assessment Tool for Patients With Moderate-Severe Traumatic Brain Injury and Cervical Spinal Cord Injury

Oropharyngeal dysphagia is common in moderate-severe traumatic brain injury (TBI) and cervical spinal cord injury (SCI) patients and can have serious consequences. Delaying feeding in these patients can also be detrimental. Nonetheless, the psychometric properties of screening tools that can promptly identify dysphagia have never been tested in these neurotrauma populations. This study aimed to: (1) adapt, translate, and validate the content of the French-Canadian version of the the Standardized Swallowing Assessment (SSA) tool to meet the needs of moderate-severe TBI and cervical SCI patients, (2) examine its inter-rater reliability and criterion-concurrent validation, and (3) evaluate its clinical utility from the perspectives of critical care nurses. The SSA tool was adapted and translated using an integrated method for the cultural adaptation and translation of tools. Eleven experts participated in the adaptation of the SSA tool, which led to the clarification of one item, as well as a new step and instructions for the screening procedure. Content validation (i.e., item and scale relevance) was evaluated by multidisciplinary team members (n = 17). The mean content validity index (CVI) score was 0.97 for the entire scale, while the mean CVI scores for individual items ranged from 0.82 to 1.0. A total of 60 neurotrauma patients were enrolled for inter-rater reliability and criterion-concurrent validation. Interrater reliability was determined by comparing two scores: one score from nurses responsible for the care of enrolled patients and one score from the research nurse. The weighted kappa coefficients for inter-rater reliability were 0.86 for moderate-severe TBI patients (n = 30) and 0.73 for cervical SCI patients (n = 30). A speech language therapist (SLT) also assessed dysphagia and results were used as the standard clinical reference criterion to determine concurrent validity (sensibility and specificity) of the adapted SSA tool. The sensitivity and specificity were 92% and 50% for moderate-severe TBI, and 77% and 75% for cervical SCI, respectively. The positive predictive value (PPV) and the negative predictive value (NPV) were 65% and 87% in TBI patients, and 75% and 76% in SCI patients. Test accuracy was 71% and 77% for these same groups. The clinical utility of the tool was evaluated according to the following domains: appropriateness, accessibility of the required material, applicability, perceived effectiveness, and acceptability. Acceptability was the only domain with a level of agreement <80% (74%) among trauma critical care nurses (n = 49). Findings support the content validation and inter-rater reliability of the adapted French-Canadian version of the SSA tool in moderate-severe TBI and cervical SCI patients. Sensitivity was acceptable in both groups, but the specificity was lower, especially in moderate-severe TBI patients. Further validation of the adapted French-Canadian version of the SSA tool is needed in neurotrauma patients to confirm these results and to ensure safe dysphagia screening while avoiding oral feeding deferrals.

Pulmonary function and sarcopenia as predictors of dysphagia in cervical spinal cord injury

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective cohort study.

OBJECTIVE

To determine the risk factors associated with dysphagia in individuals with cervical spinal cord injury (CSCI) and analyze the differences between individuals with improved penetration-aspiration (PA) and persistent PA on follow-up.

SETTING

Tertiary inpatient rehabilitation facilities.

METHODS

Medical records of individuals with CSCI admitted between December 2009 and February 2023 who underwent a videofluoroscopic swallowing study (VFSS) were retrospectively reviewed. Multivariate logistic regression analysis was performed to assess risk factors for dysphagia. Differences between individuals with improved PA and persistent PA were analyzed using an independent t-test.

RESULTS

In total, 149 participants were enrolled. Age (odds ratio (OR) 1.08, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.04-1.12), percentage of forced vital capacity to predicted normal (FVC (% predicted)) (OR 0.90, 95% CI 0.85-0.94), and skeletal muscle index (OR 0.89, 95% CI, 0.79-0.99) were significant factors associated with the risk of PA. Based on the receiver operating characteristic curve analysis, the cut-off values for age, FVC (% predicted), and skeletal muscle index were determined as 56.0, 45.7, and 41.0, respectively. A secondary analysis of the follow-up VFSS was conducted on 38 participants. The follow-up FVC (% predicted) and degree of weight loss differed significantly between the improved PA and persistent PA groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Older age, low FVC (% predicted), and low skeletal muscle index can be predictors of dysphagia in patients with CSCI. On follow-up VFSS, individuals with improved PA demonstrated greater improvement in FVC (% predicted).

Prevalence of Oropharyngeal Dysphagia in Adults in Different Healthcare Settings: A Systematic Review and Meta-analyses

Oropharyngeal dysphagia (OD) is prevalent in the elderly and persons with complex medical conditions, resulting in considerable medical and psychosocial consequences and reduced quality of life. Many prevalence studies regard OD in relation to age or diagnosis. Knowledge on the prevalence of OD in different healthcare settings is lacking. This systematic review aimed to estimate the prevalence of OD in adults admitted to hospitals, rehabilitation facilities, nursing homes, and palliative care facilities through meta-analyses. A systematic literature search was completed including all dates up to March 30, 2021. The methodology and reporting were based on the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA). Forty-four out of 1,956 screened articles were deemed eligible. Considerable heterogeneity in definitions of OD and type and quality of selected outcome measures were observed. Overall within-group pooled prevalence estimates for OD determined by meta-analysis were 36.5% (95% CI 29.9 - 43.6) in the hospital setting, 42.5% (95% CI 35.8 - 49.5) in the rehabilitation setting, and 50.2% (95% CI 33.3-67.2) in nursing homes. No OD prevalence data were identified for palliative care facilities. Results for between-group analyses of OD prevalence estimates in the hospital setting were non-significant for type of assessment method, diagnostic group, and type of hospital ward, but indicated significantly higher prevalence estimates in nursing homes when using screening compared to patient-report. Future research should provide OD prevalence data for palliative care, achieve consensus in OD-related terminology when performing prevalence studies, and use screening and assessments with optimal diagnostic performance and psychometric properties.

Development of a swallowing risk screening tool and best practice recommendations for the management of oropharyngeal dysphagia following acute cervical spinal cord injury: an international multi-professional Delphi consensus

PURPOSE

International multi-professional expert consensus was sought to develop best practice recommendations for clinical management of patients following cervical spinal cord injury with oropharyngeal dysphagia and associated complications. Additionally, risk factors for dysphagia were identified to support the development of a screening tool.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A two-round Delphi study was undertaken with a 27-member panel of expert professionals in cervical spinal cord injury and complex dysphagia. They rated 85 statements across seven topic areas in round one, using a five-point Likert scale with a consensus set at 70%. Statements not achieving consensus were revised for the second round. Comparative group and individual feedback were provided at the end of each round.

RESULTS

Consensus was achieved for 50 (59%) statements in round one and a further 12 (48%) statements in round two. Recommendations for best practice were agreed for management of swallowing, respiratory function, communication, nutrition and oral care. Twelve risk factors for dysphagia were identified for components of a screening tool.

CONCLUSIONS

Best practice recommendations support wider clinical management to prevent complications and direct specialist care. Screening for risk factors allows early dysphagia identification with the potential to improve clinical outcomes. Further evaluation of the impact of these recommendations is needed.Implications for RehabilitationDysphagia is an added complication following cervical spinal cord injury (cSCI) affecting morbidity, mortality and quality of life.Early identification of dysphagia risk allows focused interventions that reduce associated nutritional and respiratory impairments.Best practice recommendations based on expert consensus provide a baseline of appropriate interventions, in the absence of empirical evidence.A multi-professional approach to rehabilitation encourages a consistent and coordinated approach to care across acute and rehabilitation settings.

Oropharyngeal Dysphagia in Acute Cervical Spinal Cord Injury: A Literature Review

Dysphagia (swallowing impairment) is a frequent complication of cervical spinal cord injury (cSCI). Recently published national guidance in the UK on rehabilitation after traumatic injury confirmed that people with cSCI are at risk for dysphagia and require early evaluation while remaining nil by mouth [National Institute for Health and Care Excellence. Rehabilitation after traumatic injury (NG211), 2022, https://www.nice.org.uk/guidance/ng21]. While the pathogenesis and pathophysiology of dysphagia in cSCI remains unclear, numerous risk factors have been identified in the literature. This review aims to summarize the literature on the risk factors, presentation, assessment, and management of dysphagia in patients with cSCI. A bespoke approach to dysphagia management, that accounts for the multiple system impairment in cSCI, is presented; the overarching aim of which is to support effective management of dysphagia in patients with cSCI to prevent adverse clinical consequences.

The prevalence and associated factors of dysphagia in Parkinson's disease: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Background

The prevalence and associated factors of dysphagia in Parkinson's disease (PD) are different in studies conducted in different countries. The purpose of our systematic review and meta-analysis was to evaluate the prevalence of dysphagia in PD and to clarify its associated factors.

Methods

Two researchers systematically searched PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, CNKI, Wanfang Database, SinoMed and VIP databases and manually searched references in the retrieved articles to identify potential research subjects. The last search was conducted on June 28, 2022. Finally, a total of 58 studies including 60 observations with 20,530 PD patients were included in our meta-analysis.

Results

The meta-analysis estimated that the pooled prevalence rate of dysphagia in PD was 36.9% (95% CI: 30.7–43.6%) and instrumental examination showed a higher prevalence (57.3%, 95% CI: 44.3–69.1%). Oceania showed the highest prevalence of dysphagia in PD (56.3%) compared to Africa (39.5%), Asia (38.6%), Europe (36.1%) and America (28.9%). Dysphagia in PD was associated with older age, lower body mass index, longer disease duration, higher Hoehn and Yahr stage and levodopa equivalent daily dose, PIGD subtype, severe motor symptoms, drooling and higher levels of depression, and lower quality of life.

Conclusions

In conclusion, our meta-analysis showed that dysphagia occurs in more than one-third of PD patients and was associated with several demographic characteristics and PD-related characteristics, motor symptoms, non-motor symptoms, as well as decreased quality of life. It deserves early screening, diagnosis, and treatment in clinical practice to prevent serious complications from dysphagia.

Voluntary Cough Testing as a Clinical Indicator of Airway Protection in Cervical Spinal Cord Injury

OBJECTIVE

Voluntary cough testing (VCT) may be useful for determining aspiration risk in neurogenic dysphagia; however, has yet to be investigated in traumatic cervical spinal cord injury (tCSCI). The study explored if VCT may elucidate swallowing safety and kinematics related to airway protection in tCSCI survivors.

METHODS

Ten inpatients, 13-73 days post-tCSCI (7 incomplete injuries), completed VCT and a modified barium swallowing study that was analyzed via the Penetration Aspiration Scale (PAS) and norm-referenced measures of swallowing events related to airway protection. Spearman rho correlations explored relations among cough airflow, median PAS, and airway protection. Mann-Whitney U tests explored group differences based on clinical airway invasion (PAS > 2) and receiver operating characteristic statistics probed the sensitivity/specificity of VCT measures.

RESULTS

Safe (PAS > 2) and unsafe swallowers differed by cough volume acceleration (CVA) for the total sample and by inspiratory duration for incomplete injuries (p = 0.03, r > 0.7). A cut-off value of 24.8 L/s for CVA predicted airway invasion (AUC = 0.917, p = 0.03) with sensitivity = 100%/specificity = 75%. CVA correlated with delayed laryngeal vestibule closure during swallowing for both the total sample and for incomplete injuries (r_s  > 0.6, p < 0.05). Blunted peak flow and prolonged cough phases were associated with disordered laryngeal kinematics and prolonged bolus transit during swallowing (p < 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

Reduced CVA, blunted peak flow, and prolonged cough phases reflected PAS and disrupted mechanisms of airway protection in tCSCI survivors, demonstrating promise for VCT as a clinical assessment for post-tCSCI dysphagia.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

3 Laryngoscope, 2022.

Utilizing Pulmonary Function Parameters to Predict Dysphagia in Individuals With Cervical Spinal Cord Injuries

Objective

To utilize pulmonary function parameters as predictive factors for dysphagia in individuals with cervical spinal cord injuries (CSCIs).

Methods

Medical records of 78 individuals with CSCIs were retrospectively reviewed. The pulmonary function was evaluated using spirometry and peak flow meter, whereas the swallowing function was assessed using a videofluoroscopic swallowing study. Participants were divided into the non-penetration-aspiration group (score 1 on the Penetration-Aspiration Scale [PAS]) and penetration-aspiration group (scores 2–8 on the PAS). Individuals with pharyngeal residue grade scores >1 were included in the pharyngeal residue group.

Results

The mean age was significantly higher in the penetration-aspiration and pharyngeal residue groups. In this study, individuals with clinical features, such as advanced age, history of tracheostomy, anterior surgical approach, and higher neurological level of injury, had significantly more penetration-aspiration or pharyngeal residue. Individuals in the penetration-aspiration group had significantly lower peak cough flow (PCF) levels. Individuals in the pharyngeal residue group had a significantly lower forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV1). According to the receiver operating characteristic curve analysis of PCF and FEV1 on the PAS, the cutoff value was 140 L/min and 37.5% of the predicted value, respectively.

Conclusion

Low PCF and FEV1 values may predict the risk of dysphagia in individuals with CSCIs. In these individuals, active evaluation of swallowing is recommended to confirm dysphagia.

Daily acute intermittent hypoxia enhances serotonergic innervation of hypoglossal motor nuclei in rats with and without cervical spinal injury

Intermittent hypoxia elicits protocol-dependent effects on hypoglossal (XII) motor plasticity. Whereas low-dose, acute intermittent hypoxia (AIH) elicits serotonin-dependent plasticity in XII motor neurons, high-dose, chronic intermittent hypoxia (CIH) elicits neuroinflammation that undermines AIH-induced plasticity. Preconditioning with repeated AIH and mild CIH enhance AIH-induced XII motor plasticity. Since intermittent hypoxia pre-conditioning could enhance serotonin-dependent XII motor plasticity by increasing serotonergic innervation density of the XII motor nuclei, we tested the hypothesis that 3 distinct intermittent hypoxia protocols commonly studied to elicit plasticity (AIH) or simulate aspects of sleep apnea (CIH) differentially affect XII serotonergic innervation. Sleep apnea and associated CIH are common in people with cervical spinal injuries and, since repetitive AIH is emerging as a promising therapeutic strategy to improve respiratory and non-respiratory motor function after spinal injury, we also tested the hypotheses that XII serotonergic innervation is increased by repetitive AIH and/or CIH in rats with cervical C2 hemisections (C2Hx). Serotonergic innervation was assessed via immunofluorescence in male Sprague Dawley rats, with and without C2Hx (beginning 8 weeks post-injury) exposed to 28 days of: 1) normoxia; 2) daily AIH (10, 5-min 10.5% O2 episodes per day; 5-min normoxic intervals); 3) mild CIH (5-min 10.5% O2 episodes; 5-min intervals; 8 h/day); and 4) moderate CIH (2-min 10.5% O2 episodes; 2-min intervals; 8 h/day). Daily AIH, but neither CIH protocol, increased the area of serotonergic immunolabeling in the XII motor nuclei in both intact and injured rats. C2Hx per se had no effect on XII serotonergic innervation density. Thus, daily AIH may increases XII serotonergic innervation and function, enhancing the capacity for serotonin-dependent, AIH-induced plasticity in upper airway motor neurons. Such effects may preserve upper airway patency and/or swallowing ability in people with cervical spinal cord injuries and other clinical disorders that compromise breathing and airway defense.

Speech and language therapy service provision in spinal injury units compared to major trauma centres in England: Are services matched?

BACKGROUND

National UK guidance makes recommendations for speech and language therapy staffing levels in critical care and rehabilitation settings. Traumatic spinal cord injury patients often require admission primarily to critical care services within a major trauma centre prior to transfer to a specialist spinal injury unit but may not receive similar levels of care. Dysphagia and communication difficulties are recognised features of cervical spinal cord injury; however, little is known about access to speech and language therapy services to provide rehabilitation and improve outcomes.

AIMS

The aim of this study was to compare the workforce and clinical practices of speech and language therapy services in eight spinal injury units and four major trauma centres in England through an online survey.

METHODS & PROCEDURES

An online survey was created with 26 multiple-choice questions across seven sub-sections, with options for free-text comments. These were sent to a named speech and language therapy contact at each of the specified units. Responses were uploaded into Excel for analyses, which included descriptive statistics and analysis of themes.

OUTCOMES & RESULTS

Responses were received from 92% (11/12) speech and language therapy services invited, which included seven out of eight spinal injury units and all four major trauma centres. No units met national staffing recommendations. Staff in spinal injury units provided an average of 27 h per week input to the unit compared to 80 h in a major trauma centre. Despite caseload variations, speech and language range of therapy involvement and prioritisation process were equivalent. Access to instrumental assessment varied, with less use of Fibreoptic Endoscopic Evaluation of Swallowing in spinal injury units despite its clinical value to the spinal cord injury caseload.

CONCLUSIONS & IMPLICATIONS

Speech and language therapy services delivering post-acute and long-term rehabilitation to spinal cord injury patients are limited by their resources and capacity, which restricts the level of therapy delivered to patients. This may have an impact on clinical outcomes for communication and swallowing impairments. Further evidence is needed of the interventions delivered by speech and language therapists and outcomes will be beneficial alongside benchmarking similar services.

WHAT THIS PAPER ADDS

What is already known on this subject In England, people who sustain a spinal cord injury are admitted to a major trauma centre prior to transfer to a specialist spinal injury unit. Dysphagia and communication impairments are recognised as a complication of cervical spinal cord injury and benefit from speech and language therapy intervention. National recommendations exist for staffing levels, expertise and competencies for speech and language therapists working in critical care and rehabilitation units. What this study adds This study identified variations in the levels of speech and language therapy staffing, seniority, service delivery and access to instrumental assessments for dysphagia between major trauma centres and spinal injury units. None of the services complied with national staffing recommendations. Clinical implications of this study Speech and language therapy services in spinal injury units are often available part-time or have limited access to diagnostic tools which limits the range and intensity of rehabilitation input available. This has clinical implications for outcomes for swallowing and communication as well as long-term consequences for integrating back into community.

Dysphagia in cervical spinal cord injury: How international literature trends can guide South African practice patterns - A scoping review

BACKGROUND

The limited data regarding dysphagia in high-level spinal cord injuries (SCIs) stem from economically developed countries. Dysphagia is prevalent in patients with cervical SCI; however, in a South African context, speech-language pathologists (SLPs) are not seen as key when managing this population. This may result in patients not being screened or identified early, leading to possible complications. The literature could provide useful insight on how best to address this clinical gap.

OBJECTIVES

The aim of my study was to conduct a scoping review on the description of dysphagia, the risk factors for developing dysphagia post-SCI and the practice patterns of team members working with dysphagia in cervical SCIs.

METHODS

A five-step scoping review was undertaken. Data were analysed by using descriptive statistics as well as a thematic analysis by using a top-down approach.

RESULTS

Through the process of screening according to the inclusion and exclusion criteria, 25 articles were included. Primarily, the pharyngeal phase was affected, which can lead to an aspiration pneumonia. The key risk factors were the presence of a tracheostomy tube, the use of ventilation and anterior spinal cord surgery. There was little mention regarding specific practice patterns, but an interdisciplinary approach was suggested as the most efficient model.

CONCLUSIONS

Specific guidelines and management options need to be considered for a South African context, given the high incidence of trauma-related injuries. There needs to be locally produced research, providing suggestions on how different team members can screen and identify dysphagia within this population. Solutions need to be unique, and contextually responsive and appropriate.

CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS

The team members and the roles of these different team members need to be re-examined in order to ensure the early identification and management of cervical SCI patients who are at risk of developing a dysphagia.

Protein Considerations for Athletes With a Spinal Cord Injury

Athlete participation in the Paralympic games is steadily increasing; prompting research focused on the unique needs of this population. While the Paralympic Games includes a diversity of athletes, athletes with a spinal cord injury (PARA-SCI) represent a subgroup that requires specialized recommendations. Nutritional guidelines designed to optimize performance, in the context of the neurological impairments, are required. This narrative review summarizes the current literature regarding the importance of dietary protein for optimal health and performance. Factors with the potential to affect protein needs in PARA-SCI including loss of active muscle mass, reduced energy expenditure, and secondary complications are examined in detail. Furthermore, we analyze protein intakes in PARA-SCI from the available research to provide context around current practices and trends. In conclusion, we make the case that protein recommendations for able-bodied athletes may not be directly transferable to PARA-SCI. Consequently, PARA-SCI need their own guidelines to maximize performance and ensure long-term health.

Prevalence, Pathophysiology, Diagnostic Modalities, and Treatment Options for Dysphagia in Critically Ill Patients

Postextubation dysphagia may impose a substantial burden on intensive care unit patients and healthcare systems. Approximately 517,000 patients survive mechanical ventilation during critical care annually. Reports of postextubation dysphagia prevalence are highly variable ranging between 3% and 93%. Of great concern is aspiration leading to the development of aspiration pneumonia when patients resume oral feeding. Screening for aspiration with a water swallow test has been reported to be positive for 12% of patients in the intensive care unit after extubation. This review aims to increase awareness of postextubation dysphagia and provide an updated overview of the current knowledge regarding prevalence, pathophysiology, diagnostic modalities, and treatment options.

Mechanism of Dysphagia after Acute Traumatic Cervical Spinal Cord Injury

Swallowing dysfunction, which may cause aspiration pneumonia, is one of the most important complications of treatment of traumatic cervical spinal cord injury (CSCI); however, the mechanism of dysphagia is not well understood. No previous studies have reported the association between morphological changes of the soft tissue and dysphagia. We aimed to determine the factors associated with severity of dysphagia after CSCI and elucidate its mechanism. We conducted a prospective analysis of patients with acute traumatic CSCI who were admitted within 2 weeks of the injury. Dysphagia was evaluated using the Dysphagia Severity Scale (DSS) 2 weeks after the injury. The widths of the retropharyngeal and retrotracheal spaces were measured to assess soft tissue damage owing to the injury using sagittal images of computed tomography. We also assessed age, surgery of the injured cervical spine, presence of tracheostomy, osteophyte behind the pharynx, level of injury, and motor score 2 weeks after the injury. A total of 136 persons met our criteria. Given that 44 persons were categorized under grades <5 of the DSS, which were defined as different types of aspirations, the incidence of aspiration was 32%. The multiple regression analysis revealed that age, motor score, tracheostomy, and retropharyngeal space were significantly associated with DSS. Severe paresis, tracheostomy, old age, and swelling of the retropharyngeal space were significantly affected by dysphagia after CSCI. Morphological changes in the pharynx, situated right behind the larynx, after the injury affects the mechanism of dysphagia.

Association between Prevertebral Soft Tissue Thickening and Dysphagia in Cases of Traumatic Cervical Spinal Cord Injury

Objective

The objectives of this study were to clarify whether prevertebral soft tissue (PVST) thickening increases the risk of dysphagia, to identify at which vertebral level determining PVST thickness is useful, and to determine cutoff values.

Methods

A total of 80 patients with traumatic cervical spinal cord injury (TCSCI) treated over a 43-month period at a single regional institution specializing in cervical spinal cord injuries participated in the study. The exclusion criteria were having undergone anterior cervical spine surgery; a history of complicated traumatic brain injury, complicated vertebral artery injury, or brain injury; endotracheal intubation at day 30 after onset; the disappearance of neurological symptoms within 24 hours after onset; and the use of a halo vest. The associations between PVST thicknesses at C1, C2, C3, C6, and C7 measured by CT on the day of onset and the presence of dysphagia (Food Intake LEVEL Scale score <8) at 30 and 60 days after onset of TCSCI were analyzed using ROC curves to calculate the maximum area under the curve and the PVST cutoff values for these vertebrae. Associations between various risk factors, including PVST thickness, and dysphagia at days 30 and 60 after onset were examined using univariate and multivariate analyses.

Results

Independent associations with dysphagia were found with the C3 PVST thickness (day 30: ≥8.3 mm, day 60: ≥9.4 mm) and tracheostomy.

Conclusion

PVST thickness or injury seems to be an independent risk factor for dysphagia. By measuring PVST, it is possible to estimate the severity of dysphagia even in acute conditions.

A Primary Care Provider's Guide to Managing Respiratory Health in Subacute and Chronic Spinal Cord Injury

Respiratory complications following spinal cord injury (SCI) have remained the leading cause of death across the lifespan and are one of the most common reasons for hospitalization. Complications from altered respiratory physiology after SCI include atelectasis, pneumonia, venous thromboembolic disease, and sleep-disordered breathing. The risk for complications is greater with higher SCI levels and severity, and mortality from pneumonia is heightened compared to the general population. Optimal primary care for individuals with SCI includes appropriate surveillance for SCI-specific respiratory disease, key preventive care including promotion of influenza immunization and respiratory muscle training, and early identification and treatment of pneumonia with institution of aggressive secretion management strategies. The respiratory physiology and specific management of respiratory complications after SCI is reviewed.

Bidirectional Brain-gut-microbiota Axis in increased intestinal permeability induced by central nervous system injury

Central nervous system injuries may lead to the disorders of the hypothalamic‐pituitary‐adrenal axis, autonomic nervous system, and enteric nervous system. These effects then cause the changes in the intestinal microenvironment, such as a disordered intestinal immune system as well as alterations of intestinal bacteria. Ultimately, this leads to an increase in intestinal permeability. Inflammatory factors produced by the interactions between intestinal neurons and immune cells as well as the secretions and metabolites of intestinal flora can then migrate through the intestinal barrier, which will aggravate any peripheral inflammation and the central nervous system injury. The brain‐gut‐microbiota axis is a complex system that plays a crucial role in the occurrence and development of central nervous system diseases. It may also increase the consequences of preventative treatment. In this context, here we have summarized the factors that can lead to the increased intestinal permeability and some of the possible outcomes.

Pharyngeal Dysphagia in Individuals With Cervical Spinal Cord Injury: A Prospective Observational Cohort Study

Objectives: To identify and describe the types and time course of dysphagia following cervical spinal cord injury (SCI). Methods: This was a prospective cohort study conducted in an SCI inpatient rehabilitation unit. Seventy-six individuals with SCI were enrolled. Inclusion criteria were age 18 years or older, admitted into SCI inpatient rehabilitation unit, and medically stable for participation in bedside swallow evaluation (BSE) and videofluoroscopic swallow study (VFSS). All participants first underwent a BSE, of whom 33 completed a VFSS. A follow-up BSE was conducted on individuals who tested positive on the initial BSE and continued to show signs of dysphagia. Diagnosis and type of dysphagia as well risk factors were collected. Results: Twenty-three out of 76 individuals with cervical SCI were diagnosed with dysphagia using the BSE. All participants with positive BSE and VFSS had pharyngeal dysfunction. For participants with a positive initial BSE and persisting dysphagia (n = 14), a follow-up BSE demonstrated resolution within 34 days. Risk factors associated with dysphagia were older age, nasogastric tube, invasive mechanical ventilation, tracheostomy, and pneumonia. Posterior spinal surgery was associated with a decreased risk of dysphagia. Conclusion: Dysphagia was present in 30% of individuals based on the initial BSE. All individuals with dysphagia demonstrated pharyngeal phase dysfunction on the VFSS. No participants experiencing dysphagia were missed on the BSE as confirmed by VFSS. In the subset of individuals who received a follow-up BSE, the time course of resolution of dysphagia was at most 34 days from initial BSE.

The time course of dysphagia following traumatic cervical spinal cord injury: a prospective cohort study

STUDY DESIGN

Prospective cohort study.

OBJECTIVES

To elucidate serial changes in dysphagia and elucidate the critical period for dysphagia following acute traumatic cervical spinal cord injury (CSCI).

SETTING

Spinal Injuries Center, Fukuoka, Japan.

METHODS

We prospectively examined individuals with acute traumatic CSCI admitted within 2 weeks after injury. Severity of dysphagia was evaluated using both the dysphagia severity scale (DSS) and functional oral intake scale (FOIS) at 2 weeks, 1 month, 2 months, and 3 months after injury. Condition of oral intake before injury was assessed by history taking. American Spinal Injury Association (ASIA) impairment scale grade and motor scores were also assessed at the same timepoints, and the correlation between dysphagia and paresis was analyzed.

RESULTS

Sixty-five individuals with CSCI were assessed consecutively for 3 months after injury. Swallowing function, evaluated using both the DSS and FOIS, was significantly decreased at 2 weeks after injury, but significantly improved thereafter. Significant correlations between severity of dysphagia (DSS and FOIS scores) and motor scores were found at 2 weeks after injury (r_s = 0.66 and 0.61; p < 0.001 and p < 0.001, respectively), indicating that individuals with lower motor scores had more severe swallowing dysfunction.

CONCLUSIONS

Dysphagia occurred immediately after injury, but gradually improved over time. Individuals with more severe paralysis had significantly more severe dysphagia. Special attention for dysphagia should be paid to individuals with severe paralysis in acute phase.