Discrepancy between functional recovery and cutaneous silent period change in surgically treated degenerative cervical myelopathy: a prospective pilot study

Neurophysiologic evaluation of patients with cervical spondylotic myelopathy

Background

Cervical spondylotic myelopathy (CSM) is a neurodegenerative disease caused by repetitive spinal cord damage that has resulted in significant clinical morbidity. The clinical evaluation of signs and symptoms, as well as neuroimaging and several neurophysiological tests, are used to make the diagnosis.

Objectives

To investigate changes in the cutaneous silent period (CuSP), cortical silent period (CoSP), and H-reflex in CSM patients, and to correlate these tests with the Japanese Orthopedic Association (JOA) score and Nurick’s grading, as well as to determine the diagnostic value of each of them.

Methods

Twenty patients (14 males and 6 females) with CSM were clinically diagnosed and documented by magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), and they were paired with another 20 healthy volunteers (13 males and 7 females) as a control group. CuSP, CoSP, and H-reflex tests were performed on both groups.

Results

In CSM patients, CuSP latency and duration are substantially longer and shorter in CSM patients, respectively. The degree of changes in CuSP latency is well correlated with the severity of the disease. Further, CoSP duration is significantly shortened. The H-reflex parameters did not differ significantly between the patient and control groups.

Conclusion

The shortened CoSP’s duration and the prolonged CuSP's latency suggest malfunction of the inhibitory and excitatory circuits in the spinal cord. The CuSP is more sensitive and specific than the CoSP in the diagnosis of a patient with CSM.

Application of electrophysiological measures in degenerative cervical myelopathy

Degenerative cervical myelopathy (DCM) is one of the leading causes of progressive spinal cord dysfunction in the elderly. Early diagnosis and treatment of DCM are essential to avoid permanent disability. The pathophysiology of DCM includes chronic ischemia, destruction of the blood–spinal cord barrier, demyelination, and neuronal apoptosis. Electrophysiological studies including electromyography (EMG), nerve conduction study (NCS), motor evoked potentials (MEPs) and somatosensory evoked potentials (SEPs) are useful in detecting the presymptomatic pathological changes of the spinal cord, and thus supplementing the early clinical and radiographic examinations in the management of DCM. Preoperatively, they are helpful in detecting DCM and ruling out other diseases, assessing the spinal cord compression level and severity, predicting short- and long-term prognosis, and thus deciding the treatment methods. Intra- and postoperatively, they are also useful in monitoring neurological function change during surgeries and disease progression during follow-up rehabilitation. Here, we reviewed articles from 1979 to 2021, and tried to provide a comprehensive, evidence-based review of electrophysiological examinations in DCM. With this review, we aim to equip spinal surgeons with the basic knowledge to diagnosis and treat DCM using ancillary electrophysiological tests.

Duration and reliability of the silent period in individuals with spinal cord injury

DESIGN

Prospective cohort study.

OBJECTIVES

We aim to better understand the silent period (SP), an inhibitory counterpart to the well-known motor evoked potential (MEP) elicited by transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS), in individuals with spinal cord injury (SCI).

SETTING

Veterans Affairs Hospital in New York.

METHODS

EMG responses were measured in the target abductor pollicis brevis at rest (TMS at 120% of resting motor threshold (RMT)) and during maximal effort (TMS at 110% of RMT). Participants with chronic cervical SCI (n = 9) and AB participants (n = 12) underwent between 3 and 7 sessions of testing on separate days. The primary outcomes were the magnitude and reliability of SP duration, resting and active MEP amplitudes, and RMT.

RESULTS

SCI participants showed significantly lower MEP amplitudes compared to AB participants. SCI SP duration was not significantly different from AB SP duration. SP duration demonstrated reduced intra-participant variability within and across sessions compared with MEP amplitudes. SCI participants also demonstrated a higher prevalence of SP 'interruptions' compared to AB participants.

CONCLUSIONS

In a small group of individuals with chronic cervical SCI, we confirmed the well-known findings that SCI individuals have lower TMS evoked potential amplitudes and a tendency toward higher TMS motor thresholds relative to able-bodied controls. We did not observe a significant difference in SP duration between individuals with versus without SCI. However, SP duration is a more reliable outcome within and across multiple sessions than MEP amplitude.