The effect of zoledronic acid on attenuation of bone loss at the hip and knee following acute traumatic spinal cord injury: a randomized-controlled study

Preventing OsteoPorosis in Spinal Cord Injury (POPSCI) Study-Early Zoledronic Acid Infusion in Patients with Acute Spinal Cord Injury

Accelerated sub-lesional bone loss is common in the first 2-3 years after traumatic spinal cord injury (TSCI), particularly in the distal femur and proximal tibia. Few studies have explored efficacy of antiresorptives for acute bone loss prevention post-TSCI, with limited data for knee bone mineral density (BMD) or beyond two years follow-up. An open-label non-randomized study was performed at Royal North Shore Hospital and Royal Rehab Centre, Sydney between 2018 and 2023. An 'acute interventional cohort' (n = 11) with TSCI (duration ≤ 12-weeks) received a single infusion of 4 mg zoledronic acid (ZOL) at baseline. A 'chronic non-interventional cohort' (n = 9) with TSCI (duration 1-5-years) did not receive ZOL. All participants underwent baseline and 6-monthly blood tests (including CTx and P1NP) and 12-monthly DXA BMD scans (including distal femur and proximal tibia). Participants were predominantly Caucasian and male (mean age 38.4 years). At baseline, the 'acute' cohort had higher serum CTx, P1NP and sclerostin concentrations, while the 'chronic' cohort had lower left hip and knee BMD. Majority with acute TSCI experienced an acute phase reaction after ZOL (9/11; 82%). In the acute cohort, left hip BMD fell by mean ~ 15% by 48 months. Left distal femoral and proximal tibial BMD declined by mean ~ 6-13% at 12 months and ~ 20-23% at 48 months, with a tendency towards greater BMD loss in motor-complete TSCI. A single early ZOL infusion in acute TSCI could not attenuate rapidly declining hip and knee BMD. Prospective controlled studies are required to establish the optimal strategy for preventing early bone loss after acute TSCI.

Spinal Cord Injury Associated Disease of the Skeleton, an Unresolved Problem with Need for Multimodal Interventions

Spinal cord injury is associated with skeletal unloading, sedentary behavior, decreases in skeletal muscle mass, and exercise intolerance, which results in rapid and severe bone loss. To date, monotherapy with physical interventions such as weight-bearing in standing frames, computer-controlled electrically stimulated cycling and ambulation exercise, and low-intensity vibration are unsuccessful in maintaining bone density after SCI. Strategies to maintain bone density with commonly used osteoporosis medications also fail to provide a significant clinical benefit, potentially due to a unique pathology of bone deterioration in SCI. In this review, the available data is discussed on evaluating and monitoring bone loss, fracture, and physical and pharmacological therapeutic approaches to SCI-associated disease of the skeleton. The treatment of SCI-associated disease of the skeleton, the implications for clinical management, and areas of need are considered for future investigation.

Zoledronic acid after spinal cord injury mitigates losses in proximal femoral strength independent of ambulation ability

Rapid bone loss can occur after spinal cord injury (SCI) and a standard of care to prevent or treat this phenomenon is an active area of research. Using advanced analysis techniques, this study demonstrates that zoledronic acid, a possible treatment, prevented loss of bone strength at the hip following SCI.

INTRODUCTION

Bone loss below the level of neurological lesion is a well-known complication of spinal cord injury (SCI), and effective preventive treatment for this phenomenon is an active area of research. Zoledronic acid has demonstrated efficacy to attenuate bone loss at the hip after SCI, but previous studies relied on measurements from dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry. The purpose of this investigation was to more thoroughly characterize changes to bone mineral and strength at the proximal femur in individuals receiving zoledronic acid in the acute SCI stage; we also examined the influence of ambulatory ability on bone outcomes.

METHODS

Participants randomized to either zoledronic acid (n = 29) or placebo (n = 30) received computed tomography (CT) scans and ambulatory assessments at baseline and 6 and 12 months following drug infusion. CT-based finite element (FE) modeling was used to predict changes in proximal femoral strength associated with treatment.

RESULTS

After 12 months, FE-predicted bone strength was reduced by a mean (SD) of 9.6 (17.9)% in the zoledronic acid group versus 24.6 (24.5)% in the placebo group (p = 0.007). These differences in strength were explained by reductions in CT measurements of both trabecular (p < 0.001) and cortical (p ≤ 0.021) bone at the femoral neck and trochanteric region. Ambulation ability influenced select trabecular and cortical parameters, but we were unable to detect an impact on FE-predicted bone strength.

CONCLUSION

These findings demonstrate that treatment with zoledronic acid in acute SCI attenuates losses in proximal femoral strength, which may reduce the risk of hip fractures across patients with varying degrees of ambulatory abilities.

Loss of lower extremity bone mineral density 1 year after denosumab is discontinued in persons with subacute spinal cord injury

Twelve months following discontinuation of denosumab, the percent decrease in mean bone mineral density (BMD) values at the hip and knee regions were similar between both the denosumab and placebo groups. These findings emphasize the need for additional trials to understand the effect of continued administration of denosumab after subacute spinal cord injury (SCI) to avoid this demineralization.

OBJECTIVE

To determine changes in BMD 1 year after denosumab was discontinued in participants with subacute SCI who had drug treatment initiated within 90 days post SCI and continued for 1 year.

METHODS

Fourteen participants who completed a randomized, double-blinded, placebo-controlled drug trial (parent study: denosumab 60 mg (Prolia, Amgen Inc., n = 8) or placebo (n = 6); administered at baseline, 6, and 12 months) were followed 12 months after the 18 months from baseline primary end point was completed. The BMD of skeletal regions below the SCI at higher risk of fracture was measured [total hip, distal femur epiphysis (DFE), distal femur metaphysis (DFM), and proximal tibia epiphysis (PTE)] by dual energy X-ray absorptiometry.

RESULTS

The percent decreases in mean BMD values at all regions of the hip and knee from 18 to 30 months were similar in both the denosumab and placebo groups. However, at 30 months, the absolute values for mean BMD remained significantly higher in the drug treatment than that of the placebo group at the DFM (p = 0.03), DFE (p = 0.04), and PTE (p = 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

In persons with SCI who initiated denosumab treatment during the subacute injury phase and maintained treatment for 1 year, the discontinuation of drug resulted in percent loss of mean BMD similar to that of the placebo group, with absolute mean BMD values at the knee regions at the 12-month follow-up visit significantly higher in the drug treatment than those in the placebo group. These data underscore the need to study continued administration of denosumab after subacute SCI to avoid marked demineralization in the sublesional skeleton upon discontinuation of this agent.

Bisphosphonates Alleviate Bone Loss in People with Acute Spinal Cord Injury：A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

OBJECTIVE

Bone loss is not to be underestimated in people with acute spinal cord injury (SCI). Bisphosphonates can inhibit the bone resorption of osteoclast. To study whether the early application of bisphosphonates can alleviate bone loss after acute SCI, we included 7 randomized controlled trials for meta-analysis.

METHODS

Seven randomized controlled trials were found in literature databases. The percentage change in bone mineral density (BMD) at different sites were primary outcomes and serum bone turnover markers were secondary outcomes. A random-effects model was selected for meta-analysis.

RESULTS

There were significant differences in the percentage change in BMD of the lumbar spine, total hip, and femoral neck between the bisphosphonates and control groups, but not in the percentage change in distal femur BMD. Besides, there were no statistically significant differences between the groups in the bone formation marker Procollagen type 1 N propeptide; bisphosphonates were effective in reducing the C-terminal telopeptide at the 6-month follow-up, but not at the 12-month follow-up. Subgroup analysis of the effects of zoledronate showed positive effects on BMD of the lumbar spine, total hip, and femoral neck at the 6-month follow-up and showed positive effects on BMD of the total hip and femoral neck at the 12-month follow-up.

CONCLUSIONS

Bisphosphonates can effectively alleviate the bone loss of the lumbar spine, total hip, and femoral neck in patients with acute SCI, and early application is advocated.

Pharmacologic and nonpharmacologic treatment modalities for bone loss in SCI - Proposal for combined approach

Increased risk of bone fracture due to bone mineral density (BMD) loss is a serious consequence of spinal cord injury (SCI). Traditionally, pharmaceutical approaches, such as bisphosphonates, have been prescribed to prevent bone loss. However, there is controversy in the literature regarding efficacy of these medications to mitigate the drastic bone loss following SCI. Individuals with SCI are particularly at risk of osteoporosis because of the lack of ambulation and weight bearing activities. In the past two decades, functional electric stimulation (FES) has allowed for another approach to treat bone loss. FES approaches are expanding into various modalities such as cycling and rowing exercises and show promising outcomes with minimal consequences. In addition, these non-pharmacological treatments can elevate overall physical and mental health. This article provides an overview of efficacy of different treatment options for BMD loss for SCI and advocates for a combined approach be pursued in standard of care.

Durability and delayed treatment effects of zoledronic acid on bone loss after spinal cord injury: a randomized, controlled trial

A single infusion of zoledronic acid (ZOL) after acute spinal cord injury (SCI) attenuates bone loss at the hip (proximal femur) and knee (distal femur and proximal tibia) for at least 6 months. The objective of this study was to examine the effects of timing and frequency of ZOL over 2 years. In this double-blind, placebo-controlled trial, we randomized 60 individuals with acute SCI (<120 days of injury) to receive either ZOL 5-mg infusion (n = 30) or placebo (n = 30). After 12 months, groups were again randomized to receive ZOL or placebo, resulting in four treatment groups for year 2: (i) ZOL both years; (ii) ZOL year 1, placebo year 2; (iii) placebo year 1, ZOL year 2; and (iv) placebo both years. Our primary outcome was bone loss at 12 months; compared to placebo, a single infusion of ZOL attenuated bone loss at the proximal femur, where median changes relative to baseline were -1.7% to -2.2% for ZOL versus -11.3% to -12.8% for placebo (p < 0.001). Similarly, the distal femur and proximal tibia showed changes of -4.7% to -9.6% for ZOL versus -8.9% to -23.0% for placebo (p ≤ 0.042). After 24 months, differences were significant at the proximal femur only (-3.2% to -6.0% for ZOL vs. -16.8% to -21.8% for placebo; p ≤ 0.018). Although not statistically significant, median bone density losses suggested some benefit from two annual infusions compared to a single baseline infusion, as well as from a single infusion 12 months after baseline compared to 2 years of placebo; therefore, further investigation in the 12-month to 24-month treatment window is warranted. No unanticipated adverse events associated with drug treatment were observed. In summary, ZOL 5-mg infusion after acute SCI was well-tolerated and may provide an effective therapeutic approach to prevent bone loss in the first few years following SCI. © 2021 American Society for Bone and Mineral Research (ASBMR).

The efficacy and safety of bisphosphonate analogs for treatment of osteoporosis after spinal cord injury: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

Bisphosphonates can inhibit osteoclast-mediated bone resorption, prevent bone loss, and reduce the risk of osteoporotic fractures. Our meta-analysis of studies shows that early bisphosphonate administration after SCI was safe and beneficial to the BMD of the total hip and lumbar spine at 12 months.

INTRODUCTION

Rapid bone loss in the early stages of spinal cord injury (SCI) leads to an increased risk of osteoporotic fracture. A meta-analysis was conducted to assess the efficacy and safety of bisphosphonates for the treatment of osteoporosis after SCI.

METHODS

A literature search of the PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science databases identified nine randomized controlled trials with 206 individuals. This meta-analysis was performed using a random-effects model. The primary outcome was the percent change in bone mineral density (BMD) of the total hip, distal femur, and lumbar spine from baseline to 12 months. Bone turnover markers were secondary outcomes. The incidences of adverse events were assessed in order to evaluate safety.

RESULTS

There were significant differences in BMD of the total hip and lumbar spine or serum C-terminal telopeptide between the bisphosphonate and control groups but no difference in adverse events. The percent change in BMD of the distal femur and serum type 1 procollagen N-terminal peptide from baseline to 12 months was not superior in the treatment groups. Osteoclast-mediated bone resorption was inhibited by bisphosphonate administration. Subgroup analyses of participants treated with zoledronate at different sites revealed a beneficial effect on BMD of the total hip and lumbar spine but not the distal femur.

CONCLUSION

Early bisphosphonate administration after SCI was safe and beneficial to the BMD of the total hip and lumbar spine at 12 months.

Factors influencing providers' decisions on management of bone health in people with spinal cord injury

STUDY DESIGN

Survey.

OBJECTIVES

Managing osteoporosis in persons with chronic spinal cord injury (SCI) is difficult as little evidence exists regarding effective strategies. We examined the effect of key factors on providers' bone health management decisions in persons with SCI.

SETTING

USA.

METHODS

Providers reviewed blocks of 9 hypothetical cases that varied on four factors: osteoporosis, osteopenia, or normal bone mineral density using dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA); DXA region of interest (lumbar spine, hip, knee), prior lower extremity fracture; and no or limited ambulation. They indicated how likely they would recommend pharmacological management, what treatment(s) they would recommend, and whether they would request another DXA before treatment.

RESULTS

Eighty-two healthcare providers completed the survey. Treatment recommendations for bisphosphonates and Vitamin D/calcium supplements, respectively, were more likely if there was a prior fracture (OR: 2.65, 95%CI: 1.76-3.99, p < 0.0001; OR: 2.96, 95%CI: 1.40-6.26, p = 0.004) and if a DXA scan found osteopenia (OR: 2.23, 95%CI: 1.41-3.54, p = 0.001; OR: 6.56, 95%CI: 2.71-15.85, p < 0.0001) or osteoporosis (OR: 12.08, 95%CI: 7.09-20.57, p < 0.0001; OR: 4.54, 95%CI: 2.08-9.90, p < 0.0001). Another DXA scan was more likely to be requested if there was a prior fracture (OR: 1.75, 95%CI: 1.10-2.78, p = 0.02) but less likely if the person was nonambulatory (OR: 0.41, 95%: 0.19-0.90, p = 0.03).

CONCLUSIONS

Prior fracture and DXA findings influenced treatment recommendations for bone health management in SCI. Reliance on lumbar spine scans to determine bone loss and treatment identifies a knowledge gap for which future education is required.