Classification challenges of the 2019 revised International Standards for Neurological Classification of Spinal Cord Injury (ISNCSCI)

Changing trends in traumatic spinal cord injury in an aging society: Epidemiology of 1152 cases over 15 years from a single center in Japan

Traumatic spinal cord injury (TSCI) causes an insult to the central nervous system, often resulting in devastating temporary or permanent neurological impairment and disability, which places a substantial financial burden on the health-care system. This study aimed to clarify the up-to-date epidemiology and demographics of patients with TSCI treated at the largest SCI center in Japan. Data on all patients admitted to the Spinal Injuries Center with TSCI between May 2005 and December 2021 were prospectively collected using a customized, locally designed SCI database named the Japan Single Center Study for Spinal Cord Injury Database (JSSCI-DB). A total of 1152 patients were identified from the database. The study period was divided into the four- or five-year periods of 2005-2009, 2010-2013, 2014-2017, and 2018-2021 to facilitate the observation of general trends over time. Our results revealed a statistically significant increasing trend in age at injury. Since 2014, the average age of injury has increased to exceed 60 years. The most frequent spinal level affected by the injury was high cervical (C1-C4: 45.8%), followed by low cervical (C5-C8: 26.4%). Incomplete tetraplegia was the most common cause or etiology category of TSCI, accounting for 48.4% of cases. As the number of injuries among the elderly has increased, the injury mechanisms have shifted from high-fall trauma and traffic accidents to falls on level surfaces and downstairs. Incomplete tetraplegia in the elderly due to upper cervical TSCI has also increased over time. The percentage of injured patients with an etiology linked to alcohol use ranged from 13.2% (2005-2008) to 19% (2014-2017). Given that Japan has one of the highest aging populations in the world, epidemiological studies in this country will be very helpful in determining health insurance and medical costs and deciding strategies for the prevention and treatment of TSCI in future aging populations worldwide.

A future blood test for acute traumatic spinal cord injury

Acute spinal cord injury (SCI) requires prompt diagnosis and intervention to minimize the risk of permanent neurologic deficit. Presently, SCI diagnosis and interventional planning rely on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), which is not always available or feasible for severely injured patients. Detection of disease-specific biomarkers in biofluids via liquid biopsy may provide a more accessible and objective means of evaluating patients with suspected SCI. Cell-free DNA, which has been used for diagnosing and monitoring oncologic disease, may detect damage to spinal cord neurons via tissue-specific methylation patterns. Other types of biomarkers, including proteins and RNA species, have also been found to reflect neuronal injury and may be included as part of a multi-analyte assay to improve liquid biopsy performance. The feasibility of implementing liquid biopsy into current practices of SCI management is supported by the relative ease of blood sample collection as well as recent advancements in droplet digital polymerase chain reaction technology. In this review, we detail the current landscape of biofluid biomarkers for acute SCI and propose a framework for the incorporation of a putative blood test into the clinical management of SCI.

Cell therapies for spinal cord injury: a review of the clinical trials and cell-type therapeutic potential

Spinal cord injury (SCI) is an as yet untreatable neuropathology that causes severe dysfunction and disability. Cell-based therapies hold neuroregenerative and neuroprotective potential, but, although being studied in SCI patients for more than two decades, long-term efficacy and safety remain unproven, and which cell types result in higher neurological and functional recovery remains under debate. In a comprehensive scoping review of 142 reports and registries of SCI cell-based clinical trials, we addressed the current therapeutical trends and critically analysed the strengths and limitations of the studies. Schwann cells, olfactory ensheathing cells (OECs), macrophages and various types of stem cells have been tested, as well as combinations of these and other cells. A comparative analysis between the reported outcomes of each cell type was performed, according to gold-standard efficacy outcome measures like the ASIA impairment scale, motor and sensory scores. Most of the trials were in the early phases of clinical development (phase I/II), involved patients with complete chronic injuries of traumatic aetiology and did not display a randomized comparative control arm. Bone marrow stem cells and OECs were the most commonly tested cells, while open surgery and injection were the main methods of delivering cells into the spinal cord or submeningeal spaces. Transplantation of support cells, such as OECs and Schwann cells, resulted in the highest ASIA Impairment Scale (AIS) grade conversion rates (improvements in ∼40% of transplanted patients), which surpassed the spontaneous improvement rate expected for complete chronic SCI patients within 1 year post-injury (5-20%). Some stem cells, such as peripheral blood-isolated and neural stem cells, offer potential for improving patient recovery. Complementary treatments, particularly post-transplantation rehabilitation regimes, may contribute highly to neurological and functional recovery. However, unbiased comparisons between the tested therapies are difficult to draw, given the great heterogeneity of the design and outcome measures used in the SCI cell-based clinical trials and how these are reported. It is therefore crucial to standardize these trials when aiming for higher value clinical evidence-based conclusions.

Radiological analysis of minimally invasive treatment of type A thoracolumbar fractures based on a series of 135 fractures

INTRODUCTION

Although the reduction of traumatic fractures of the thoracolumbar spine is of good quality during conventional so-called open procedures, the alternative minimally invasive approach also appears to confer good results. The aim of this study was to measure the radiological parameters before and after minimally invasive surgery, in order to assess the quality of the reduction of thoracolumbar compression fractures.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This retrospective, monocentric study included 112 patients with a mean age of 48.9years, presenting with 135 type A thoracolumbar compression fractures treated by a posterior minimally invasive surgical approach comprising vertebral augmentation or posterior osteosynthesis or a mixed procedure.

RESULTS

The parameters analyzed were significantly lower whatever the procedure in the immediate postoperative period. Mean regional and local kyphosis, posterior wall displacement, and mean vertebral height were significantly lower (p<0.01). Fracture reduction was better when osteosynthesis was associated with vertebral augmentation. In the osteosynthesis subgroup with osteosynthesis hardware removal but without vertebral augmentation, we found a significant worsening of the regional kyphosis (p<0.05).

CONCLUSION

The management of thoracolumbar compression fractures by a posterior minimally invasive approach allows excellent fracture reduction with a restoration of the spinal canal, vertebral height and kyphosis.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

IV.

The International Standards for Neurological Classification of Spinal Cord Injury: Classification Accuracy and Challenges

Background

Successful utilization of the International Standards for Neurological Classification of Spinal Cord Injury (ISNCSCI) requires a comprehensive understanding of its rules, terminology, and several complex concepts. There have been no studies investigating classification accuracy since the newest ISNCSCI revision (2019).

Objectives

To evaluate classification accuracy of SCI professionals using the 2019 ISNCSCI edition, identify common mistakes and areas of confusion, and assess associations between experience in ISNCSCI classification and performance.

Methods

Members of the International Spinal Cord Society (ISCoS) and attendees of the ISCoS Annual Scientific Meeting 2021 were invited to complete an online survey that included six ISNCSCI cases to classify.

Results

A total of 107 persons completed the survey, with overall classification accuracy of 74.6%. Accuracy was highest for injury completeness (95.3%) and sensory level (91.1%) and lowest for motor zone of partial preservation (ZPP; 54.7%) and ASIA Impairment Scale (AIS) grade (57.3%). Newer concepts, including the appropriate documentation of non-SCI conditions and classification of ZPP in incomplete injuries, contributed to several common errors. There was a significant association between overall classification accuracy and self-rated experience in the ISNCSCI classification (p = .017). Experience with the ISNCSCI examination, experience in SCI medicine, and occupation were not found to be significantly associated with overall classification accuracy.

Conclusion

Classification accuracy of an international cohort of SCI professionals was modest but greater than previous reports. Knowledge deficits about the 2019 ISNCSCI updates are prevalent and contribute to common classification errors. Further training in the utilization of the ISNCSCI is needed.

Segmental motor recovery after cervical spinal cord injury relates to density and integrity of corticospinal tract projections

Cervical spinal cord injury (SCI) causes extensive impairments for individuals which may include dextrous hand function. Although prior work has focused on the recovery at the person-level, the factors determining the recovery of individual muscles are poorly understood. Here, we investigate the muscle-specific recovery after cervical spinal cord injury in a retrospective analysis of 748 individuals from the European Multicenter Study about Spinal Cord Injury (NCT01571531). We show associations between corticospinal tract (CST) sparing and upper extremity recovery in SCI, which improves the prediction of hand muscle strength recovery. Our findings suggest that assessment strategies for muscle-specific motor recovery in acute spinal cord injury are improved by accounting for CST sparing, and complement person-level predictions.

Utility of transcranial magnetic stimulation in the assessment of spinal cord injury: Current status and future directions

Comprehensive assessment following traumatic spinal cord injury (SCI) is needed to improve prognostication, advance the understanding of the neurophysiology and better targeting of clinical interventions. The International Standards for Neurological Classification of Spinal Cord Injury is the most common clinical examination recommended for use after a SCI. In addition, there are over 30 clinical assessment tools spanning across different domains of the International Classification of Functioning, Disability, and Health that have been validated and recommended for use in SCI. Most of these tools are subjective in nature, have limited value in predicting neurologic recovery, and do not provide insights into neurophysiological mechanisms. Transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) is a non-invasive neurophysiology technique that can supplement the clinical assessment in the domain of body structure and function during acute and chronic stages of SCI. TMS offers a better insight into neurophysiology and help in better detection of residual corticomotor connectivity following SCI compared to clinical assessment alone. TMS-based motor evoked potential and silent period duration allow study of excitatory and inhibitory mechanisms following SCI. Changes in muscle representations in form of displacement of TMS-based motor map center of gravity or changes in the map area can capture neuroplastic changes resulting from SCI or following rehabilitation. Paired-pulse TMS measures help understand the compensatory reorganization of the cortical circuits following SCI. In combination with peripheral stimulation, TMS can be used to study central motor conduction time and modulation of spinal reflexes, which can be used for advanced diagnostic and treatment purposes. To strengthen the utility of TMS in SCI assessment, future studies will need to standardize the assessment protocols, address population-specific concerns, and establish the psychometric properties of TMS-based measurements in the SCI population.

Surface EMG in Subacute and Chronic Care after Traumatic Spinal Cord Injuries

Background: Traumatic spinal cord injury (SCI) is a devastating condition commonly originating from motor vehicle accidents or falls. Trauma care after SCI is challenging; after decompression surgery and spine stabilization, the first step is to assess the location and severity of the traumatic lesion. For this, clinical outcome measures are used to quantify the residual sensation and volitional control of muscles below the level of injury. These clinical assessments are important for decision-making, including the prediction of the recovery potential of individuals after the SCI. In clinical care, this quantification is usually performed using sensation and motor scores, a semi-quantitative measurement, alongside the binary classification of the sacral sparing (yes/no). Objective: In this perspective article, I review the use of surface EMG (sEMG) as a quantitative outcome measurement in subacute and chronic trauma care after SCI. Methods: Here, I revisit the main findings of two comprehensive scoping reviews recently published by our team on this topic. I offer a perspective on the combined findings of these scoping reviews, which integrate the changes in sEMG with SCI and the use of sEMG in neurorehabilitation after SCI. Results: sEMG provides a complimentary assessment to quantify the residual control of muscles with great sensitivity and detail compared to the traditional clinical assessments. Our scoping reviews unveiled the ability of the sEMG assessment to detect discomplete lesions (muscles with absent motor scores but present sEMG). Moreover, sEMG is able to measure the spontaneous activity of motor units at rest, and during passive maneuvers, the evoked responses with sensory or motor stimulation, and the integrity of the spinal cord and descending tracts with motor evoked potentials. This greatly complements the diagnostics of the SCI in the subacute phase of trauma care and deepens our understanding of neurorehabilitation strategies during the chronic phase of the traumatic injury. Conclusions: sEMG offers important insights into the neurophysiological factors underlying sensorimotor impairment and recovery after SCIs. Although several qualitative or semi-quantitative outcome measures determine the level of injury and the natural recovery after SCIs, using quantitative measures such as sEMG is promising. Nonetheless, there are still several barriers limiting the use of sEMG in the clinical environment and a need to advance high-density sEMG technology.

Impact of Heterotopic Ossification on Functional Recovery in Acute Spinal Cord Injury

Objective: In spinal cord injury (SCI), heterotopic ossification is a frequent secondary complication, commonly associated with limited range of motion of affected joints, which could lead to secondary disability in activities of daily living. Additionally, heterotopic ossifications might challenge the effect of regeneration-promoting therapies on neurological and functional recovery. This study evaluated the impact of heterotopic ossification on clinical recovery within the first year after SCI.

Methods: The study was conducted as a monocentric longitudinal paired cohort study. Recruitment was based on consecutive sampling in the framework of the European Multicenter about Spinal Cord Injury (EMSCI). Recovery profiles were determined using standardized neurological and functional clinical assessments within the 1st year following SCI. All study participants underwent at least two comprehensive standardized neurological and functional clinical examinations according to the International Standards for Neurological Classification of SCI and the Spinal Cord Independence Measure, respectively. Data regarding the diagnosis and treatment of heterotopic ossification were obtained by reviewing the patient medical records. The most similar “digital twin” from the entire EMSCI database were matched in terms of age, acute neurological and functional status to each individual with SCI, and heterotopic ossification.

Results: Out of 25 participants diagnosed with heterotopic ossification, 13 individuals were enrolled and matched to control individuals. Most individuals presented with motor complete injury (75%). Ossifications were most frequently located at the hip joints (92%) and mainly occurred within the first 3 months after SCI. Individuals with heterotopic ossification achieved around 40% less functional improvement over time compared to their matched counterparts, whereas neurological recovery was not altered in individuals with SCI and heterotopic ossification.

Conclusion: Heterotopic ossification—a common complication of SCI—unfavorably affects functional recovery, which in the end is most relevant for the best possible degree of independence in activities of daily living. Upon presentation with heterotopic ossification, neurological improvement achieved through potential restorative therapies might not translate into clinically meaningful functional improvement. Diagnostic algorithms and effective early prevention/treatment options for heterotopic ossification need to be established to ensure the best possible functional outcome.

Clinical Trial Registration: NCT01571531 (https://clinicaltrials.gov).