The microbiological and physical properties of catheters for intermittent catheterization: a systematic review on the impact of reuse and cleaning

Switching from intermittent catheterization with single-use catheter to a reusable catheter has a negative impact on quality of life

PURPOSE

It has been proposed that reusable catheters are more cost effective and environmentally sustainable than single-use catheters intended for intermittent catheterization (IC). However, the aspect of individuals' well-being and preference for catheter type is not considered. In this study, we investigated the impact on individuals' health-related quality of life (HR-QoL) when testing a reusable catheter.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The study was an open-labeled, single-arm, multicenter investigation with a treatment period of 28 days. Forty subjects using single-use hydrophilic catheters were accustomed to a reusable catheter for managing IC. HR-QoL was evaluated by the Intermittent-Self Catheterization Questionnaire (ISC-Q). Additionally, satisfaction was evaluated by the Intermittent Catheterization Satisfaction Questionnaire (InCaSa-Q). The difference in total score was analyzed using a mixed linear model. Furthermore, preference for IC (single-use vs. reusable) was assessed and microbial evaluation of the catheters was performed.

RESULTS

The total ISC-Q score measuring HR-QoL decreased significantly by 28% (p < 0.001). Two of the four subdomains (ease-of-use and discreetness) also decreased significantly (p < 0.001). The total InCaSa-score and all four subdomains evaluating satisfaction decreased significantly (p < 0.005). The primary study results were supported by the fact that 90.9% of subjects preferred to use a single-use catheter for IC. Furthermore, 50% of reusable catheters were contaminated with bacteria.

CONCLUSION

Switching from single-use to reusable IC resulted in a significant decrease in HR-QoL and satisfaction. Moreover, the vast majority preferred the single-use catheter due to handling and convenience. The users' rights to their preferred bladder management method should be acknowledged.

[Intermittent catheterization: What are the environmental impacts and how can they be reduced?]

INTRODUCTION

If the use of intermittent catheterization has revolutionized the prognosis of neuro-urology patients, it seems necessary to question the ecological cost of single-use catheters, in a process of decarbonization of the health sector. The aim of this work is to identify the environmental impact of intermittent catheterization and potential solutions to reduce it.

METHODS

A review of the literature on the environmental impact of intermittent catheterizations was conducted. Potential solutions to reduce this impact and possible alternatives were then studied based on data from the literature.

RESULTS

Only two studies were identified. The first estimated the amount of waste generated by intermittent catheterization in the USA to be between 4400 and 38,964 tons per year. The second study showed a higher overall environmental impact of thermoplastic polyurethane (TPU) catheters than polyvinyl chloride (PVC) catheters and catheters made from polyolefin material. Reuse of catheters would reduce the amount of waste, but the paucity of data does not allow us to determine if the incidence of urinary tract infection would be affected. Alternative micturition methods, in addition to the complications they may cause, require the use of collection bags or pads, which also have an environmental impact. Other treatments for dysuria exist, but the evidence is limited and does not cover all patient populations.

CONCLUSION

With limited alternatives, it appears essential to develop more environmentally friendly catheters.

The Microbiological Burden of Short-Term Catheter Reuse in Individuals with Spinal Cord Injury: A Prospective Study

Despite the risk of developing catheter-associated urinary tract infections (CAUTI), catheter reuse is common among people with spinal cord injury (SCI). This study examined the microbiological burden and catheter surface changes associated with short-term reuse. Ten individuals with chronic SCI reused their catheters over 3 days. Urine and catheter swab cultures were collected daily for analysis. Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) and X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) analyses were used to assess catheter surface changes. Catheter swab cultures showed no growth after 48 h (47.8%), skin flora (28.9%), mixed flora (17.8%), or bacterial growth (5.5%). Asymptomatic bacteriuria was found for most participants at baseline (n = 9) and all at follow-up (n = 10). Urine samples contained Escherichia coli (58%), Klebsiella pneumoniae (30%), Enterococcus faecalis (26%), Acinetobacter calcoaceticus-baumannii (10%), Pseudomonas aeruginosa (6%) or Proteus vulgaris (2%). Most urine cultures showed resistance to one or more antibiotics (62%). SEM images demonstrated structural damage, biofilm and/or bacteria on all reused catheter surfaces. XPS analyses also confirmed the deposition of bacterial biofilm on reused catheters. Catheter surface changes and the presence of antibiotic-resistant bacteria were evident following short-term reuse, which may increase susceptibility to CAUTI in individuals with SCI despite asymptomatic bacteriuria.